Abramowitz, Alan I. and Segal, Jeffrey A.. 1992. Senate Elections. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan PressGoogle Scholar

Albert, A. and Anderson, J. A.. 1984. “On the Existence of Maximum Likelihood Estimates in Logistic Regression Models.” Biometrika, 71:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Albert, James H. and Chib, Siddhartha. 1993. “Bayesian Analysis of Binary and Polychotomous Response Data.” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88:669–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aldrich, John H. and McGinnis, Michael D.. 1989. “A Model of Party Constraints on Optimal Candidate Positions.” Mathematical and Computer Modeling, 12:437–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amacher, Ryan C. and Boyes, William J.. 1978. “Cycles in Senatorial Voting Behavior: Implications for the Optimal Frequency of Elections.” Public Choice, 33(3): 5–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andrich, David. 1988. Rasch Models for Measurement. Newbury Park, CA: SageCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andrich, David. 1995. “Hyperbolic Cosine Latent Trait Models for Unfolding Direct Responses and Pairwise Preferences.” Applied Psychological Measurement, 19:269–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ansolabehere, Stephen, Snyder, James M. Jr., and Stewart, Charles III., 2001. “Candidate Positioning in U.S. House Elections.” American Journal of Political Science, 45:136–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Austen-Smith, David. 1987. “Interest Groups, Campaign Contributions, and Probabilistic Voting.” Public Choice, 54:123–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Austen-Smith, David and Banks, Jeffrey S.. 2000. Positive Political Theory I: Collective Preference. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan PressGoogle Scholar

Austen-Smith, David and Banks, Jeffrey S.. 2004. Positive Political Theory II: Strategy and Structure. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan PressGoogle Scholar

Bailey, Michael. 2002. “Comparing Presidents, Senators, and Justices, 1946–2002.” Working Paper, Georgetown University

Bailey, Michael and Chang, Kelly. 2001. “Comparing Presidents, Senators, and Justices: Inter-institutional Preference Estimation.” Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 17:477–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bennett, Joseph F. and Hays, William L.. 1960. “Multidimensional Unfolding: Determining the Dimensionality of Ranked Preference Data.” Psychometrika, 25:27–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Berndt, E. K., Hall, Bronwyn H., Hall, Robert E., and Hausman, Jerry. 1974. “Estimation and Inference in Nonlinear Structural Models.” Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, 3/4:653–666Google Scholar

Bernhard, William and Brian R. Sala. 2004. “The Dynamics of Senate Voting: “Ideological Shirking” and the 17th Amendment.” Paper Presented at the Annual Meetings of the Southern Political Science Association, New Orleans, LA

Bernhardt, M. Daniel and Ingberman, Daniel E.. 1985. “Candidate Reputations and the ‘Incumbency Effect’.” Journal of Public Economics, 27:47–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Best, Alvin M., Young, Forrest W., and Hall, Robert G.. 1979 “On the Precision of a Euclidean Structure.” Psychometrika, 44:395–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Black, Duncan. 1948 “On the Rationale of Group Decision Making.” Journal of Political Economy, 56:23–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Black, Duncan. 1958. The Theory of Committees and Elections. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Blokland-Vogelesang, Rian. 1991. Unfolding and Group Consensus Ranking for Individual Preferences. Leiden: DWSO PressGoogle Scholar

Borg, Ingwer and Groenen, Patrick. 1997. Modern Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Applications. New York: SpringerCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brady, Henry. 1990 “Traits Versus Issues: Factor Versus Ideal-Point Analysis of Candidate Thermometer Ratings.” Political Analysis, 2:97–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brady, David W. and Volden, Craig. 1998. Revolving Gridlock Politics and Policy from Carter to Clinton. Boulder, CO: Westview PressGoogle Scholar

Cahoon, Lawrence S. 1975. Locating a Set of Points Using Range Information Only. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Statistics, Carnegie-Mellon University

Cahoon, Lawrence S., Melvin J. Hinich, and Peter C. Ordeshook. 1976. “A Multidimensional Statistical Procedure for Spatial Analysis.” Manuscript, Carnegie-Mellon University

Cahoon, Lawrence S., Hinich, Melvin J., and Ordeshook, Peter C.. 1978. “A Statistical Multidimensional Scaling Method Based on the Spatial Theory of Voting.” In Graphical Representation of Multivariate Data, edited by Wang, P. C.. New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar

Calvert, Randall. 1985 “Robustness of the Multidimensional Voting Model: Candidates' Motivations, Uncertainty, and Convergence.” American Journal of Political Science, 29:69–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E.. 1960. The American Voter. New York: WileyGoogle Scholar

Carmines, Edward G. and Stimson, James A.. 1989. Issue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar

Carroll, J. Douglas. 1972. “Individual Differences and Multidimensional Scaling.” In Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Applications in the Behavioral Sciences, edited by Romney, A. Kimball, Shepard, Roger N., and Nerlove, Sara Beth. New York: Seminar PressGoogle Scholar

Carroll, J. Douglas. 1980. “Models and Methods for Multidimensional Analysis of Preferential Choice (or Other Dominance) Data.” In Similarity and Choice, edited by Lantermann, E. D. and Feger, H.. Bern, Switzerland: HuberGoogle Scholar

Carroll, J. Douglas and Chang, Jih-Jie. 1970. “Analysis of Individual Differences in Multidimensional Scaling via an N-Way Generalization of ‘Eckart–Young’ decomposition.” Psychometrika, 35:283–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chang, Jih-Jie and J. Douglas Carroll. 1969. “How to Use MDPREF, a Computer Program for Multidimensional Analysis of Preference Data.” Multidimensional Scaling Program Package of Bell Laboratories, Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ

Chater, Nick. 1999. “The Search for Simplicity: A Fundamental Cognitive Principle?” Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52A:273–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cheng, Ken. 2000 “Shepard's Universal Law Supported by Honeybees in Spatial Generalization.” Psychological Science, 5:403–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clinton, Joshua D. 2003. “Same Principals, Same Agents, Different Institutions: Roll Call Voting in the Continental Congress, Congresses of Confederation and the U.S. Senate, 1774–1786.” Working Paper, Princeton University

Clinton, Joshua D. and Meirowitz, Adam H.. 2003 “Integrating Voting Theory and Roll-Call Analysis: A Framework.” Political Analysis, 11:381–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clinton, Joshua D. and Meirowitz, Adam H.. 2004 “Testing Accounts of Legislative Strategic Voting: The Compromise of 1790.” American Journal of Political Science, 48:675–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clinton, Joshua D., Jackman, Simon D., and Rivers, Douglas. 2004 “The Statistical Analysis of Roll Call Data: A Unified Approach.” American Political Science Review, 98:355–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Converse, Philip E. 1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In Ideology and Discontent, edited by Apter, David E.. New York: Free PressGoogle Scholar

Coombs, Clyde. 1950 “Psychological Scaling Without a Unit of Measurement.” Psychological Review, 57:148–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coombs, Clyde. 1964. A Theory of Data. New York: WileyGoogle Scholar

Courant, Richard and Hilbert, David. 1937. Methods of Mathematical Physics: Volume I. Berlin: Julius SpringerGoogle Scholar

Cox, Gary W. 1999 “The Empirical Content of Rational Choice Theory: A Reply to Green and Shapiro.” Journal of Theoretical Politics, 11:147–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cox, Gary W. 2004. “Lies, Damned Lies and Rational Choice Analysis.” In Problems and Methods in the Study of Politics, edited by Shapiro, Ian, Smith, Rogers M., and Masoud, Tarek E.. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Cox, Gary W. and Katz, Jonathan N.. 2002. Elbridge Gerry's Salamander: The Electoral Consequences of the Reapportionment Revolution. New York: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cox, Gary W. and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1993. Legislative Leviathan. Berkeley, CA: University of California PressGoogle Scholar

Cox, Gary W. and Mathew D. McCubbins. 2004. “Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the US House of Representatives.” Manuscript, University of California, San Diego

Cox, Gary W. and Poole, Keith T.. 2002a. “On Measuring Partisanship in Roll Call Voting: The U.S. House of Representatives, 1877–1999.” American Journal of Political Science, 46:477–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cox, Gary W. and Keith T. Poole. 2002b. “Measuring Group Differences in Roll Call Voting.” Manuscript, University of Houston

Cox, Trevor F. and Michael, A. A. Cox. 2001. Multidimensional Scaling. New York: Chapman and Hall/CRCGoogle Scholar

Cragg, John G. and Donald, Stephen G.. 1997 “Inferring the Rank of a Matrix.” Journal of Econometrics, 76:223–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar

D'Andrade, Roy G., Quinn, Naomi R., Nerlove, Sara Beth, and Romney, A. Kimball. 1972. “Categories of Disease in American-English and Mexican-Spanish.” In Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Applications in the Behavioral Sciences, edited by Romney, A. Kimball, Shepard, Roger N., and Nerlove, Sara Beth. New York: Seminar PressGoogle Scholar

Davis, Otto A. and Hinich, Melvin J.. 1966. “A Mathematical Model of Policy Formation in a Democratic Society.” In Mathematical Applications in Political Science, II, edited by Bernd, J. L.. Dallas: SMU Press, pp. 175–208Google Scholar

Davis, Otto A. and Hinich, Melvin J.. 1967. “Some Results Related to a Mathematical Model of Policy Formation in a Democratic Society.” In Mathematical Applications in Political Science III, edited by Bernd, J.. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia Press, pp. 14–38Google Scholar

Davis, Otto A., Hinich, Melvin J., and Ordeshook, Peter C.. 1970 “An Expository Development of a Mathematical Model of the Electoral Process.” American Political Science Review, 64:426–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeSarbo, Wayne S. and Cho, Jaewun 1989 “A Stochastic Multidimensional Scaling Vector Threshold Model for the Spatial Representation of ‘Pick Any/N’ Data.” Psychometrika, 54:105–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeSarbo, Wayne S. and Hoffman, Donna L.. 1987 “Constructing MDS Joint Spaces from Binary Choice Data: A Multidimensional Unfolding Threshold Model for Marketing Research.” Journal of Marketing Research, 24:40–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dhrymes, Phoebus J. 1978. Introductory Econometrics. New York: Springer-VerlagCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diermeier, Daniel. 1996. “Rational Choice and the Role of Theory in Political Science.” In The Rational Choice Controversy, edited by Friedman, Jeffrey. New Haven: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar

Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & RowGoogle Scholar

Eckart, Carl and Young, Gale. 1936 “The Approximation of One Matrix by Another of Lower Rank.” Psychometrika, 1: 211–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Efron, Bradley. 1979 “Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife.” Annals of Statistics, 7:1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Efron, Bradley and Tibshirani, Robert J.. 1993. An Introduction to the Bootstrap. New York: Chapman & HallCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ekman, Gosta. 1954 “Dimensions of Color Vision.” Journal of Psychology, 38:467–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellenberg, Jordan. 2001. “Growing Apart: The Mathematical Evidence for Congress' Growing Polarization.” Slate, 26 December 2001

Elling, Richard C. 1982. “Ideological Change in the U.S. Senate: Time and Electoral Responsiveness.” Legislative Studies Quarterly, 7(1):75–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Embretson, Susan and Reise, Steven P.. 2000. Item Response Theory for Psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence ErlbaumGoogle Scholar

Enelow, James M. and Hinich, Melvin. 1984. The Spatial Theory of Voting. New York: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Ennis, Daniel M. 1988a. “Confusable and Discriminable Stimuli: Comment on Nosofsky (1986) and Shepard (1986).” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117:408–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ennis, Daniel M. 1988b. “Technical Comments: Toward a Universal Law of Generalization.” Science, 242:944CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ennis, Daniel M., Palen, Joseph J., and Mullen, Kenneth. 1988 “A Multidimensional Stochastic Theory of Similarity.” Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 32:449–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feldman, Stanley and Zaller, John. 1992 “Political Culture of Ambivalence: Ideological Responses to the Welfare State.” American Journal of Political Science, 36:268–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ferejohn, John and Satz, Debra. 1996. “Unification, Universalism, and Rational Choice Theory.” In The Rational Choice Controversy, edited by Friedman, Jeffrey. New Haven: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar

Ferejohn, John and Debra Satz. 2000. “Rational Choice Theory and Mental Models.” Working Paper, Stanford University

Feyerabend, Paul K. 1975. Against Method. London: New Left PressGoogle Scholar

Fiorina, Morris P. 1996. “Rational Choice, Empirical Contributions, and the Scientific Enterprise.” In The Rational Choice Controversy, edited by Friedman, Jeffrey. New Haven: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar

Firth, David and Arthur Spirling. 2003. “Divisions of the United Kingdom House of Commons, from 1992 to 2003 and Beyond.” Working Paper, Nuffield College, Oxford

Fischer, Gerhard H. and Molenaar, Ivo W.. 1995. Rasch Models: Foundations, Recent Developments, and Applications. New York: Springer-VerlagCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Garner, Wendell R. 1974. The Processing of Information and Structure. New York: WileyGoogle Scholar

Gelfand, Alan E. and Smith, Adrian F. M.. 1990 “Sampling-Based Approaches to Calculating Marginal Densities.” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85:398–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gelman, Andrew. 1992 “Iterative and Non-iterative Simulation Algorithms.” Computing Science and Statistics, 24:433–438Google Scholar

Gelman, Andrew, Carlin, John B., Stern, Hal S., and Rubin, Donald B.. 2000. Bayesian Data Analysis. New York: Chapman and Hall/CRCGoogle Scholar

Geman, Donald and Geman, Stuart. 1984 “Stochastic Relaxation, Gibbs Distributions, and the Bayesian Restoration of Images.” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 6:721–741CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gerber, Elizabeth R. and Jeffrey B. Lewis. 2002. “Beyond the Median: Voter Preferences, District Heterogeneity, and Representation.” Working Paper, UCLA

Gifi, Albert. 1990. Nonlinear Multivariate Analysis. Chicester, England: WileyGoogle Scholar

Gill, Jeff. 2002. Bayesian Methods: A Social and Behavioral Sciences Approach. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRCGoogle Scholar

Gleason, Terry C. and Staelin, Richard. 1975 “A Proposal for Handling Missing Data.” Psychometrika, 40:229–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gluck, Mark A. 1991 “Stimulus Generalization and Representation in Adaptive Network Models of Category Learning.” Psychological Science, 2:50–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gombrich, Ernst Hans. 1978. The Story of Art (13th edition). New York: Phaidon PressGoogle Scholar

Goodman, Craig. 2004. “Ideological Constraint in Congress: Experiments in Roll Call Voting.” Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Houston

Green, Donald P. and Shapiro, Ian. 1994. Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory: A Critique of Applications in Political Science. New Haven: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar

Greene, William H. 1993. Econometric Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice HallGoogle Scholar

Guttman, Louis L. 1944 “A Basis for Scaling Qualitative Data.” American Sociological Review, 9:139–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Guttman, Louis L. 1954. “A New Approach to Factor Analysis.” In Mathematical Thinking in the Social Sciences, edited by Lazarsfeld, P. F.. Glencoe, IL: Free PressGoogle Scholar

Haberman, Shelby J. 1977 “Maximum Likelihood Estimation in Exponential Response Models.” Annals of Statistics, 5:815–841CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hammond, Thomas H. and Fraser, Jane M.. 1983 “Baselines for Evaluating Explanations of Coalition Behavior in Congress.” Journal of Politics, 45:635–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Harrington, Joseph. 1992 “The Role of Party Reputation in the Formation of Policy.” Journal of Public Economics, 49:107–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hastings, W. Keith. 1970 “Monte Carlo Sampling Methods Using Markov Chains and Their Applications.” Biometrika, 54:97–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heckman, James J. and Snyder, James M.. 1997 “Linear Probability Models of the Demand for Attributes with an Empirical Application to Estimating the Preferences of Legislators.” Rand Journal of Economics, 28:142–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Heiser, Willem J. 1981. Unfolding Analysis of Proximity Data. Leiden: University of LeidenGoogle Scholar

Hinich, Melvin J. and Munger, Michael. 1994. Ideology and the Theory of Political Choice. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hinich, Melvin J. and Munger, Michael. 1997. Analytical Politics. New York: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hinich, Melvin J. and Pollard, Walker. 1981 “A New Approach to the Spatial Theory of Electoral Competition.” American Journal of Political Science, 25:323–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hinich, Melvin J. and Roll, Richard. 1981 “Measuring Nonstationarity in the Parameters of the Market Model.” Research in Finance, 3:1–51Google Scholar

Hitchcock, David B. 2003 “A History of the Metropolis–Hastings Algorithm.” The American Statistician, 57:254–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoadley, John F. 1980 “The Emergence of Political Parties in Congress, 1789–1803.” American Political Science Review, 74:757–779CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hoffer, Eric. 1951. The True Believer: Thoughts on the Nature of Mass Movements. New York: Harper & Row (Perennial Library Edition, 1966, 1989)Google Scholar

Hojo, Hiroshi. 1994 “A New Method for Multidimensional Unfolding.” Behaviormetrika, 21:131–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Horst, Paul. 1963. Matrix Algebra for Social Scientists. New York: Holt, Rinehart and WinstonGoogle Scholar

Hotelling, Harold. 1929 “Stability in Competition.” The Economic Journal, 39:41–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackman, Simon D. 2000a. “Estimation and Inference via Bayesian Simulation: An Introduction to Markov Chain Monte Carlo.” American Journal of Political Science, 44:375–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackman, Simon D. 2000b. “Estimation and Inference are ‘Missing Data’ Problems: Unifying Social Science Statistics via Bayesian Simulation.” Political Analysis, 8:307–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jackman, Simon D. 2001 “Multidimensional Analysis of Roll Call Data via Bayesian Simulation: Identification, Estimation, Inference and Model Checking.” Political Analysis, 9:227–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jenkins, Jeffery A. and Munger, Michael C.. 2003. “Investigating the Incidence of Killer Amendments in Congress.” Journal of Politics, 65:498–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jenkins, Jeffery A. and Sala, Brian R.. 1998. “The Spatial Theory of Voting and the Presidential Election of 1824.” American Journal of Political Science, 42:1157–1179CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Johnson, Richard M. 1963 “On a Theorem Stated by Eckart and Young.” Psychometrika, 28:259–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Keller, Joseph B. 1962 “Factorization of Matrices by Least-Squares.” Biometrika, 49:239–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kiewiet, D. Roderick and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1991. The Logic of Delegation: Congressional Parties and the Appropriation Process. Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar

King, Gary, Honaker, James, Joseph, Anne, and Scheve, Kenneth. 2001 “Analyzing Incomplete Political Science Data: An Alternative Algorithm for Multiple Imputation.” American Political Science Review, 95:49–69Google Scholar

King, David. 1998. “Party Competition and Polarization in American Politics.” Paper Prepared for the 1998 Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association

Krehbiel, Keith. 1993. “Where's the Party?” British Journal of Political Science, 23(1):235–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krehbiel, Keith. 1998. Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking. Chicago: University of Chicago PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kruskal, Joseph B. 1964a. “Multidimensional Scaling by Optimizing a Goodness of Fit to a Nonmetric Hypothesis.” Psychometrika, 29:1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kruskal, Joseph B. 1964b. “Nonmetric Multidimensional Scaling: A Numerical Method.” Psychometrika, 29:115–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kruskal, Joseph B. and Wish, Myron. 1978. Multidimensional Scaling. Beverly Hills, CA: SageCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kruskal, Joseph B., Forrest W. Young, and Judith B. Seery. 1973. “How to Use KYST: A Very Flexible Program to Do Multidimensional Scaling and Unfolding.” Multidimensional Scaling Program Package of Bell Laboratories, Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ

Kuhn, Thomas S. 1962/1996. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (3rd edition). Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar

Ladha, Krishna K. 1991 “A Spatial Model of Legislative Voting with Perceptual Error.” Public Choice, 68:151–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laudan, Larry. 1984. Science and Values: The Aims of Science and Their Role in Scientific Debate. Berkeley, CA: University of California PressGoogle Scholar

Laudan, Larry. 1996. Beyond Positivism and Relativism: Theory, Method and Evidence. Boulder, CO: Westview PressGoogle Scholar

Lawson, Charles L. and Hanson, Richard J.. 1974. Solving Least Squares Problems. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-HallGoogle Scholar

Lewis, Jeffrey B. and King, Gary. 1999 “No Evidence on Directional vs. Proximity Voting.” Political Analysis, 8:21–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lewis, Jeffrey B. and Poole, Keith T.. 2004. “Measuring Bias and Uncertainty in Ideal Point Estimates via the Parametric Bootstrap.” Political Analysis, 12:105–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Livingstone, Margaret S. 2002. Vision and Art: The Biology of Seeing. New York: Harry N. AbramsGoogle Scholar

Londregan, John B. 2000a. “Estimating Legislators' Preferred Points.” Political Analysis, 8(1):35–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Londregan, John B. 2000b. Legislative Institutions and Ideology in Chile. New York: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Londregan, John B. and Snyder, James M. Jr. 1994 “Comparing Committee and Floor Preferences.” Legislative Studies Quarterly, 19:233–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Loomis, Michael. 1995. “Constituent Influences Outside the Spatial Structure of Legislative Voting.” Doctoral Dissertation, Carnegie-Mellon University

Lord, Frederic M. 1983 “Unbiased Estimates of Ability Parameters, of Their Variance, and of Their Parallel Forms Reliability.” Psychometrika, 48:477–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lott, John R. Jr. and Bronars, Stephen G.. 1993 “Time Series Evidence on Shirking in the U.S. House of Representatives.” Public Choice, 76:125–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lublin, David (1997). The Paradox of Representation: Racial Gerrymandering and Minority Representation in Congress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar

Macdonald, Stuart, Rabinowitz, George, and Listhaug, Ola. 2001 “Sophistry versus Science: On Further Efforts to Rehabilitate the Proximity Model.” The Journal of Politics, 63:482–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar

MacRae, Duncan Jr. 1958. Dimensions of Congressional Voting. Berkeley: University of California PressGoogle Scholar

MacRae, Duncan Jr. 1970. Issues and Parties in Legislative Voting. New York: Harper and RowGoogle Scholar

McCarty, Nolan M. 1997. “Presidential Reputation and the Veto.” Economics and Politics, 9(1):1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCarty, Nolan M. 2000. “Proposal Rights, Veto Rights, and Political Bargaining.” American Journal of Political Science, 44(3):506–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCarty, Nolan M. and Poole, Keith T.. 1995. “Veto Power and Legislation: An Empirical Analysis of Executive and Legislative Bargaining from 1961–1986.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 11:Google Scholar

McCarty, Nolan M., Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 1997. Income Redistribution and the Realignment of American Politics. Washington, DC: AEI PressGoogle Scholar

McCarty, Nolan M., Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 2001 “The Hunt for Party Discipline in Congress.” American Political Science Review, 95:673–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCarty, Nolan M., Keith T. Poole, and Howard Rosenthal. 2003. “Political Polarization and Income Inequality.” Manuscript, University of Houston

McCarty, Nolan M. and Rothenberg, Lawrence S. (1996). “Commitment and the Campaign Contribution Contract.” American Journal of Political Science, 40:872–904CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McCarty, Nolan M. and Razaghian, Rose. 1999. “Advice and Consent: Senate Response to Executive Branch Nominations 1885–1996.” American Journal of Political Science, 43(3):1122–1143CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McFadden, Daniel. 1976 “Quantal Choice Analysis: A Survey.” Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, 5:363–390Google Scholar

Manski, Charles F. 1975 “Maximum Score Estimation of the Stochastic Utility Model of Choice.” Journal of Econometrics, 3:205–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Manski, Charles F. 1985 “Semiparametric Analysis of Discrete Response: Asymptotic Properties of the Maximum Score Estimator.” Journal of Econometrics, 27:313–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Manski, Charles F. and Thompson, T. Scott. 1986 “Operational Characteristics of Maximum Score Estimation.” Journal of Econometrics, 32:85–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, Andrew D. 2003 “Bayesian Inference for Heterogeneous Event Counts.” Sociological Methods and Research, 32:30–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Martin, Andrew D. and Kevin M. Quinn. 2001. “Bayesian Learning about Ideal Points of U. S. Supreme Court Justices, 1953–1999.” Working Paper, Washington University, St. Louis

Martin, Andrew D. and Quinn, Kevin M.. 2002 “Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953–1999.” Political Analysis, 10:134–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Merrill, Samuel III and Grofman, Bernard. 1999. A Unified Theory of Voting: Directional and Proximity Models. New York: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Metropolis, Nicholas C. and Ulam, Stanislaw. 1949 “The Monte Carlo Method.” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 44:335–341CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Miller, George A. 1956 “The Magical Number Seven, Plus Minus One: Some Limits on our Capacity for Processing Information.” Psychological Review, 63:81–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morgenstern, Scott. 2004. Patterns of Legislative Politics: Roll-Call Voting in Latin America and the United States. New York: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Morrison, Richard J. 1972 “A Statistical Model for Legislative Roll Call Analysis.” Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 2:235–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morton, Rebecca B. 1987 “A Group Majority Voting Model of Public Good Provision.” Social Choice and Welfare, 4:117–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Neyman, Jerzy and Scott, Elizabeth L.. 1948 “Consistent Estimates Based on Partially Consistent Observations.” Econometrica, 16:1–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nie, Norman H., Verba, Sidney, and Petrocik, John R.. 1979. The Changing American Voter. New York: Replica BooksCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nokken, Timothy P. 2000 “Dynamics of Congressional Loyalty: Party Defection and Roll Call Behavior, 1947–1997.” Legislative Studies Quarterly, 25:417–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nokken, Timothy P. and Keith T. Poole. 2004. “Congressional Party Defection in American History.” Legislative Studies Quarterly, forthcoming

Nosofsky, Robert M. 1984 “Choice, Similarity, and the Context Theory of Classification.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 10:104–114Google ScholarPubMed

Nosofsky, Robert M. 1986 “Attention, Similarity, and the Identification–Categorization Relationship.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115:39–57CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Nosofsky, Robert M. 1988 “On Exemplar-Based Exemplar Representations: Reply to Ennis (1988).” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117:412–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nosofsky, Robert M. 1991 “Stimulus Bias, Asymmetric Similarity, and Classification.” Cognitive Psychology, 23:94–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nosofsky, Robert M. 1992 “Similarity Scaling and Cognitive Process Models.” Annual Review of Psychology, 43:25–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Oppenheimer, Bruce I. 2000. “The Roll Call Behavior of Members Who Switch Parties, 1900–99: The Effect of Variations in Party Strength.” Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago

Ordeshook, Peter C. 1976. “The Spatial Theory of Elections: A Review and a Critique.” In Party Identification and Beyond, edited by Budge, Ian, Crewe, Ivor, and Farlie, Dennis. New York: WileyGoogle Scholar

Ordeshook, Peter C. 1996. “Engineering or Science: What is the Study of Politics?” In The Rational Choice Controversy, edited by Friedman, Jeffrey. New Haven: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar

Palfrey, Thomas R. 1984 “Spatial Equilibrium with Entry.” Review of Economic Studies, 51:139–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Perlstein, Rick. 2001. Before the Storm: Barry Goldwater and the Unmaking of the American Consensus. New York: Hill and WangGoogle Scholar

Platt, Glenn, Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 1992 “Directional and Euclidean Theories of Voting Behavior: A Legislative Comparison.” Legislative Studies Quarterly, 17:561–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poole, Keith T. 1981. “Dimensions of Interest Group Evaluations of the U.S. Senate, 1969–1978.” American Journal of Political Science, 25(1):49–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poole, Keith T. 1984 “Least Squares Metric, Unidimensional Unfolding.” Psychometrika, 49:311–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poole, Keith T. 1988 “Recent Developments in Analytical Models of Voting in the U.S. Congress.” Legislative Studies Quarterly, 13:117–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poole, Keith T. 1990 “Least Squares Metric, Unidimensional Scaling of Multivariate Linear Models.” Psychometrika, 55:123–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poole, Keith T. 1997. “Non-parametric Analysis of Binary Choice Data.” Manuscript, University of Houston

Poole, Keith T. 1998 “Recovering a Basic Space From a Set of Issue Scales.” American Journal of Political Science, 42:954–993CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poole, Keith T. 1999 “NOMINATE: A Short Intellectual History.” The Political Methodologist, 9:1–6Google Scholar

Poole, Keith T. 2000a. “Non-parametric Unfolding of Binary Choice Data.” Political Analysis, 8(3):211–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poole, Keith T. 2000b. “Appendix to Non-parametric Unfolding of Binary Choice Data.” Manuscript, University of Houston

Poole, Keith T. 2001. “The Geometry of Multidimensional Quadratic Utility in Models of Parliamentary Roll Call Voting.” Political Analysis, 9(3):211–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poole, Keith T. 2003. “Changing Minds? Not in Congress!” Manuscript, University of Houston

Poole, Keith T. and Romer, Thomas. 1993 “Ideology, Shirking and Representation.” Public Choice, 77:185–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poole, Keith T. and Rosenthal, Howard. 1984a. “U.S. Presidential Elections 1968–1980: A Spatial Analysis.” American Journal of Political Science, 28:282–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poole, Keith T. and Rosenthal, Howard. 1984b. “The Polarization of American Politics.” Journal of Politics, 46:1061–1079CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poole, Keith T. and Rosenthal, Howard. 1985 “A Spatial Model for Legislative Roll Call Analysis.” American Journal of Political Science, 29:357–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poole, Keith T. and Rosenthal, Howard. 1987 “Analysis of Congressional Coalition Patterns: A Unidimensional Spatial Model.” Legislative Studies Quarterly, 12:55–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poole, Keith T. and Rosenthal, Howard. 1991. “Patterns of Congressional Voting.” American Journal of Political Science, 35:228–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poole, Keith T. and Rosenthal, Howard. 1997. Congress: A Political–Economic History of Roll Call Voting. New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar

Poole, Keith T. and Rosenthal, Howard. 2001. “D-NOMINATE After 10 Years: A Comparative Update to Congress: A Political–Economic History of Roll Call Voting.” Legislative Studies Quarterly, 26:5–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poole, Keith T., Sowell, Fallaw B., and Spear, Stephen E.. 1992 “Evaluating Dimensionality in Spatial Voting Models.” Mathematical and Computer Modeling, 16: 85–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Quinn, Kevin M. 2004 “Bayesian Factor Analysis for Mixed Ordinal and Continuous Responses.” Political Analysis, 12:338–353CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Quinn, Kevin M. and Martin, Andrew D.. 2002 “An Integrated Computational Model of Multiparty Electoral Competition.” Statistical Science, 17:405–419Google Scholar

Quinn, Kevin M., Martin, Andrew D., and Whitford, Andrew B.. 1999 “Voter Choice in Multi-party Democracies: A Test of Competing Theories and Models.” American Journal of Political Science, 43:1231–1247CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rabinowitz, George. 1976 “A Procedure for Ordering Object Pairs Consistent with the Multidimensional Unfolding Model.” Psychometrika, 45:349–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rabinowitz, George and Macdonald, Stuart. 1989 “A Directional Theory of Issue Voting.” American Political Science Review, 83:93–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rasch, Georg. 1961. “On General Laws and the Meaning of Measurement in Psychology.” In Proceedings of the IV Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, vol. 4, pp. 321–333

Riker, William H. 1982/1988. Liberalism Against Populism: A Confrontation Between the Theory of Democracy and the Theory of Social Choice. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland PressGoogle Scholar

Rivers, Douglas. 2004. “Identification of Multidimensional Spatial Voting Models.” Manuscript, Stanford University

Romano, Roberta. 1997 “The Political Dynamics of Derivative Securities Regulation.” Yale Journal on Regulation, 14:279–406Google Scholar

Rosenberg, Seymour, Nelson, Carnot, and Vivekananthan, P. S.. 1968 “A Multidimensional Approach to the Structure of Personality Impressions.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9:283–294CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rosenthal, Howard and Voeten, Erik. 2004. “Analyzing Roll Calls with Perfect Spatial Voting: France 1946–1958.” American Journal of Political Science, 48:620–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ross, John and Cliff, Norman. 1964 “A Generalization of the Interpoint Distance Model.” Psychometrika, 29:167–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rothenberg, Lawrence S. and Sanders, Mitchell S.. 2000 “Severing the Electoral Connection: Shirking in the Contemporary Congress.” American Journal of Political Science, 44:316–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rothkopf, Ernst Z. 1957 “A Measure of Stimulus Similarity and Errors in Some Paired-Associate Learning Tasks.” Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53:94–101CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Ruger, Theodore W., Kim, Pauline T., Martin, Andrew D., and Quinn, Kevin M.. 2004. “The Supreme Court Forecasting Project: Legal and Political Science Approaches to Predicting Supreme Court Decision-Making.” Columbia Law Review, 104:1150–1209CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schofield, Norman. 1996. “Rational Choice Theory and Political Economy.” In The Rational Choice Controversy, edited by Friedman, Jeffrey. New Haven: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar

Schofield, Norman, Martin, Andrew D., Quinn, Kevin M., and Whitford, Andrew B.. 1998 “Multiparty Electoral Competition in the Netherlands and Germany: A Model Based on Multinomial Probit.” Public Choice, 97:257–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schonemann, Peter H. 1966 “A Generalized Solution of the Orthogonal Procrustes Problem.” Psychometrika, 31:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schonemann, Peter H. 1970 “Fitting a Simplex Symmetrically.” Psychometrika, 35: 1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schonemann, Peter H. and Carroll, Robert M.. 1970 “Fitting One Matrix to Another Under Choice of a Central Dilation and Rigid Motion.” Psychometrika, 35:245–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schonhardt-Bailey, Cheryl. 2003. “Ideology, Party and Interests in the British Parliament of 1841–1847,” British Journal of Political Science, 33:581–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schonhardt-Bailey, Cheryl. 2004. Interests, Ideas and Institutions: Repeal of the Corn Laws Re-told. Manuscript, London School of Economics and Political Science

Sen, Amartya K. 1970. Collective Choice and Social Welfare. San Francisco, CA: Holden-DayGoogle Scholar

Shepard, Roger N. 1962a. “The Analysis of Proximities: Multidimensional Scaling with an Unknown Distance Function. I.” Psychometrika, 27:125–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shepard, Roger N. 1962b. “The Analysis of Proximities: Multidimensional Scaling with an Unknown Distance Function. II.” Psychometrika, 27: 219–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shepard, Roger N. 1963 “Analysis of Proximities as a Technique for the Study of Information Processing in Man.” Human Factors, 5:33–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shepard, Roger N. 1986 “Discrimination and Generalization in Identification and Classification: Comment on Nosofsky.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115:58–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shepard, Roger N. 1987 “Toward a Universal Law of Generalization for Psychological Science.” Science, 237:1317–1323CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shepard, Roger N. 1988a. “Technical Comments: Toward a Universal Law of Generalization.” Science, 242:944CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shepard, Roger N. 1988b. “Time and Distance in Generalization and Discrimination: Reply to Ennis (1988).” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117:415–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shepard, Roger N. 1991. “Integrality Versus Separability of Stimulus Dimensions: Evolution of the Distinction and a Proposed Theoretical Basis.” In Perception of Structure, edited by Pomerantz, James R. and Lockhead, Gregory. Washington, DC: APAGoogle Scholar

Shepsle, Kenneth A. 1996. “Statistical Political Philosophy and Positive Political Theory.” In The Rational Choice Controversy, edited by Friedman, Jeffrey. New Haven: Yale University PressGoogle Scholar

Shipan, Charles R. and Moraski, Bryon. 1999 “The Politics of Supreme Court Nominations: A Theory of Institutional Constraints and Choices.” American Journal of Political Science, 43:1069–1095Google Scholar

Silvapulle, Mervyn J. 1981. “On the Existence of Maximum Likelihood Estimators for the Binomial Response Models.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, 43(3):310–313Google Scholar

Simmons, George F. 1972. Differential Equations with Applications and Historical Notes. New York: McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar

Smithies, Arthur. 1941 “Optimum Location in Spatial Competition.” The Journal of Political Economy, 49:423–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Snyder, James M. Jr. 1992 “Artificial Extremism in Interest Group Ratings.” Legislative Studies Quarterly, 17:319–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Snyder, James M. Jr., and Groseclose, Timothy. 2000. “Estimating Party Influence in Congressional Roll-Call Voting.” American Journal of Political Science, 44(2):193–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sowell, Thomas. 1987. A Conflict of Visions: Ideological Origins of Political Struggles. New York: QuillGoogle Scholar

Spector, David. 2000 “Rational Debate and One-Dimensional Conflict.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115:181–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stratmann, Thomas. 2000 “Congressional Voting Over Legislative Careers: Shifting Positions and Changing Constraints.” The American Political Science Review, 94:665–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tajfel, Henri. 1981. Human Groups and Social Categories. London: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar

Thomas, Martin. 1985. “Election Proximity and Senatorial Roll Call Voting.” American Journal of Political Science, 29(1):96–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Torgerson, Warren S. 1952 “Multidimensional Scaling: I. Theory and Method.” Psychometrika, 17:401–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Treier, Shawn and Simon Jackman. 2003. “Democracy as a Latent Variable.” Manuscript, Stanford University

Tucker, Ledyard R. 1960. “Intra-individual and Inter-individual Multidimensionality.” In Psychological Scaling: Theory and Applications, edited by Gulliksen, Harold and Messick, Samuel. New York: WileyGoogle Scholar

Tversky, Amos. 1977 “Features of Similarity.” Psychological Review, 84:327–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Voeten, Erik. 2000 “Clashes in the Assembly.” International Organization, 54:185–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Voeten, Erik. 2001 “Outside Options and the Logic of Security Council Action.” The American Political Science Review, 95:845–858CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Voeten, Erik. 2004. “Resisting the Lonely Superpower: Responses of States in the U.N. to U.S. Dominance.” Journal of Politics, 66:729–754CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wang, Ming-Mei, Schonemann, Peter H., and Rusk, Jerrold G.. 1975 “A Conjugate Gradient Algorithm for the Multidimensional Analysis of Preference Data.” Multivariate Behavioral Research, 10:45–80CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Weisberg, Herbert F. 1968. Dimensional Analysis of Legislative Roll Calls. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Michigan

Weisberg, Herbert F. 1978 “Evaluating Theories of Congressional Roll-Call Voting.” American Journal of Political Science, 22:551–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weisberg, Herbert F. 1983 “Alternative Baseline Models and Their Implications for Understanding Coalition Behavior in Congress.” Journal of Politics, 45:657–671CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Weisberg, Herbert F. and Rusk, Jerrold G.. 1970 “Dimensions of Candidate Evaluation.” American Political Science Review, 64:1167–1185CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wills, Garry. 1982. The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay. New York: Bantam Books

Wish, Myron. 1971. “Individual Differences in Perceptions and Preferences Among Nations.” In Attitude Research Reaches New Heights, edited by King, Charles W. and Tigert, Douglas J.. Chicago: American Marketing AssociationGoogle Scholar

Wish, Myron and Carroll, J. Douglas. 1974. “Applications of Individual Differences Scaling to Studies of Human Perception and Judgment.” In Handbook of Perception, vol. 2, edited by Carterette, Edward C. and Friedman, Morton P.. New York: Academic PressGoogle Scholar

Wittman, Donald A. 1977 “Candidates with Policy Preferences: A Dynamic Model.” Journal of Economic Theory, 14:180–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wittman, Donald A. 1983. “Candidate Motivations: A Synthesis of Alternatives.” American Political Science Review, 77:142–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wright, Gerald C. and Berkman, Michael B.. 1986. “Candidates and Policy in United States Senate Elections.” American Political Science Review, 80(2):567–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Wright, Gerald C. and Schaffner, Brian F.. 2002 “The Influence of Party: Evidence from the State Legislatures.” American Political Science Review, 96:367–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Young, Gale and Householder, A. S.. 1938 “Discussion of a Set of Points in Terms of their Mutual Distances.” Psychometrika, 3:19–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar