Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- List of contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I Economy
- Part II Environment
- 5 Air pollution
- 6 Climate change
- 7 Deforestation
- 8 Land degradation
- 9 The economics of biodiversity loss
- 10 Vulnerability to natural disasters
- Part III Governance
- Part IV Health and population
- Conclusion: Making your own prioritization
6 - Climate change
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 July 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- List of contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- Part I Economy
- Part II Environment
- 5 Air pollution
- 6 Climate change
- 7 Deforestation
- 8 Land degradation
- 9 The economics of biodiversity loss
- 10 Vulnerability to natural disasters
- Part III Governance
- Part IV Health and population
- Conclusion: Making your own prioritization
Summary
Scoping the problem
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC, 2001) offered perhaps the most efficient presentation of the climate change problem with its “burning ember” diagram; it is replicated here as Figure 6.1.
The diagram identifies five “Lines of Evidence” with color-coded indicators of economic, social, and natural vulnerabilities. Two are essentially economic indicators of aggregate impacts at the global and regional levels. They are dominated by estimates of the economic damage of climate impacts in market-based sectors such as real estate, agricultural, and energy, and they increase with the global mean temperature. They include, to some degree, evaluations of how various nations and even communities within nations might adapt to climate-related stress driven by higher temperatures as well as the cost of undertaking those adaptations.
In its recently released Fourth Assessment Report (IPCC, 2007), the IPCC concluded that new knowledge supports moving the thresholds of color change indicating increasing risk in the embers to the left – toward lower temperature ranges. It follows that potentially significant impacts are looming in the nearer term. Table 6.1 replicates table 6.1 in Stern, et al. (2006). Based on background work reported in Warren, et al. (2006), it adds texture and content to the moving embers, and it provides evidence that the new IPCC conclusion is an appropriate interpretation of how the science is evolving. Notice, in particular, how Table 6.1 shows clearly that climate impacts are likely to be felt unevenly across the globe.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Solutions for the World's Biggest ProblemsCosts and Benefits, pp. 103 - 124Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2007