Abbas, Tahir. 2007. British South Asians and pathways into selective schooling: Social class, culture and ethnicity. British Educational Research Journal 33(1). 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920601104474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Acton, Eric K. 2019. Pragmatics and the social life of the English definite article. Language 95(1). 37–65.Google Scholar

Acton, Eric K. 2021. Pragmatics and the third wave: The social meaning of definites. In Hall-Lew, Lauren, Moore, Emma & Podesva, Robert J. (eds.), Social Meaning and Linguistic Variation: Theorizing the Third Wave, 105–126. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Acton, Eric K. & Potts, Christopher. 2014. That straight talk: Sarah Palin and the sociolinguistics of demonstratives. Journal of Sociolinguistics 18(1). 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12062.Google Scholar

Agha, Asif. 2003. The social life of cultural value. Language & Communication 23(3–4). 231–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00012-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Agha, Asif. 2005. Voice, footing, enregisterment. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 15(1). 38–59. https://doi.org/10.1525/jlin.2005.15.1.38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aijmer, Karin. 1989. Themes and tails: The discourse functions of dislocated elements. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 12. 137–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alam, Farhana. 2015. “Glaswasian”? A Sociophonetic Analysis of Glasgow-Asian Accent and Identity. Glasgow, UK: University of Glasgow.Google Scholar

Algeo, John. 1988. The Tag Question in British English: It’s Different, I’N’It? English World-Wide 9(2). 171–191. https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.9.2.03alg.Google Scholar

Anderwald, Lieselotte. 2001. Was/were variation in non-standard British English today. English Today 22(1). 1–22.Google Scholar

Anderwald, Lieselotte. 2002. Negation in Non-standard British English: Gaps, Regularizations and Asymmetrics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Anderwald, Lieselotte. 2005. Negative concord in British English dialects. In Iyeiri, Yoko (ed.), Aspects of English Negation, 113–137. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Andrews, Jon, Robinson, David & Hutchinson, Jo. 2017. Closing the gap? Trends in educational attainment and disadvantage. London: Education Policy Institute. Available from: https://epi.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Closing-the-Gap_EPI.pdf [last accessed 13 June 2023].Google Scholar

Andrews, Richard, Beverton, Sue, Locke, Terry, Low, Graham, Robinson, Alison, Togerson, Carole & Zhu, Die. 2004. The effect of grammar teaching (syntax) in English on 5 to 16 year olds’ accuracy and quality in written composition. Review. University of London: EPPI-Centre, Institute of Education.Google Scholar

Ash, Sharon. 2013. Social class. In Chambers, J. K. & Schilling, Natalie (eds.), Handbook of Language Variation and Change, second edition, 350–367. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/9781118335598.ch16 [last accessed 2 June 2023].Google Scholar

Avineri, N., Johnson, E., Brice-Heath, S., McCarty, T., Ochs, E., Kremer-Sadlik, T. & Alim, H. S.. 2015. Invited forum: Bridging the “language gap.” Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 25(1). 66–86.Google Scholar

Bajona, Giulio. 2022. Mandative subjunctives in present-day British English. Leeds: University of Leeds PhD dissertation.Google Scholar

Baker-Bell, April. 2020. Dismantling anti-black linguistic racism in English language arts classrooms: Toward an anti-racist black language pedagogy. Theory Into Practice 59(1). 8–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2019.1665415.Google Scholar

Ball, Stephen J. 1981. Beachside Comprehensive: A Case-Study of Secondary Schooling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Baranowski, Maciej & Turton, Danielle. 2020. TD-deletion in British English: New evidence for the long-lost morphological effect. Language Variation and Change 32. 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barbu, Stéphanie, Nardy, Aurélie, Chevrot, Jean-Pierre & Juhel, Jacques. 2013. Language evaluation and use during early childhood: Adhesion to social norms or integration of environmental regularities? Linguistics 51(2). 381–411. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2013-0015.Google Scholar

Barron, Anne, Pandarova, Irina & Muderack, Karoline. 2015. Tag questions across Irish English and British English: A corpus analysis of form and function. Multilingua 34(4). 495–525. https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2014-0099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bates, Douglas, Maechler, Martin, Bolker, Ben, Walker, Stephen, Bojesen Christensen, Rune Haubo, Singmann, Henrik, Dai, Bin, Scheipl, Fabian & Grothendieck, Gabor. 2019. Linear Mixed-Effects Models using “Eigen” and S4, R Package, Version 1.1–19. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/lme4.pdf [last accessed 2 June 2023].Google Scholar

Beal, Joan C. 1993. The grammar of Tyneside and Northumbrian English. In Milroy, James & Milroy, Lesley (eds.), Real English: The Grammar of English Dialects in the British Isles, 187–213. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Beal, Joan C. 2004. The phonology of English dialects in the north of England. In Kortmann, Bernd (ed.), A Handbook of Varieties of English, 113–133. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Beal, Joan C. 2010. An Introduction to Regional Englishes. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Beaman, Karen V. 2021. Coherence in real- and apparent-time: A sociolinguistic variationist investigation of language change in Swabia. London: Queen Mary, University of London PhD dissertation.Google Scholar

Bell, Allan. 2001. Back in style: Reworking audience design. In Eckert, Penelope & Rickford, John (eds.), Style and Sociolinguistic Variation, 139–169. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bellinger, Charles K. 2020. Othering: The Original Sin of Humanity. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock Publishers.Google Scholar

Beltrama, Andrea & Casasanto, Laura Staum. 2017. Totally tall sounds totally younger: Intensification at the socio-semantics interface. Journal of Sociolinguistics 21(2). 154–182. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12230.Google Scholar

Beltrama, Andrea & Casasanto, Laura Staum. 2021. The social meaning of semantic properties. In Hall-Lew, Lauren, Moore, Emma & Podesva, Robert J. (eds.), Social Meaning and Linguistic Variation: Theorizing the Third Wave, 80–104. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bender, Emily M. 2001. Syntactic Variation and Linguistic Competence: The Case of AAVE Copula Absence. California, CA: Stanford University.Google Scholar

Bennett, Joe. 2012. ‘And what comes out may be a kind of screeching’: The stylisation of chavspeak in contemporary Britain. Journal of Sociolinguistics 16(1). 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2011.00521.x.Google Scholar

Biber, Douglas, Johansson, S., Leech, G. & Finegan, E.. 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar

Birner, Betty. 1994. Information status and word order: An analysis of English inversion. Language 70. 233–259.Google Scholar

Blanchette, Frances. 2015. English negative concord, negative polarity, and double negation. New York, NY: City University of New York PhD dissertation.Google Scholar

Blanchette, Frances, Nadeu, Marianna, Yeaton, Jeremy & Déprez, Viviane. 2018. English negative concord and double negation: The division of labor between syntax and pragmatics. Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America 3(53). 1–15.Google Scholar

Block, David. 2014. Social Class in Applied Linguistics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Block, David. 2018. Political Economy and Sociolinguistics. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1973. Cultural reproduction and social reproduction. In Brown, R. (ed.), Knowledge, Education and Cultural Change: Papers in the Sociology of Education, 71–112. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. The economics of linguistic exchanges. Social Science Information 16(6). 645–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1990. In Other Words: Essays towards a Reflexive Sociology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre & Passeron, Jean-Claude. 1990. Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture, second edition. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar

Bowles, Samuel & Gintis, Herbert. 2011. Schooling in Capitalist America: Educational Reform and the Contradictions of Economic Life. Revised edition. Chicago, IL: Haymarket.Google Scholar

Brechwald, Whitney A. & Prinstein, Mitchell J.. 2011. Beyond homophily: A decade of advances in understanding peer influence processes. Journal of Research on Adolescence 21(1). 116–179.Google Scholar

Bresnan, Joan, Asudeh, Ash, Toivonen, Ada & Wechsler, Stephen. 2016. Lexical-Functional Syntax. Second edition. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar

Bright, William. Nd. What’s the difference between speech and writing? Resource Hub. Linguistic Society of America.Google Scholar

Brinton, Laurel. 1990. The development of discourse markers in English. In Fisiak, Jacek (ed.), Historical Linguistics and Philology, 45–76. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Britain, David. 2002. Diffusion, levelling, simplification and reallocation in past tense BE in the English Fens. Journal of Sociolinguistics 6(1). 16–43.Google Scholar

Britain, David & Sudbury, Andrea. 2002. There’s sheep and there’s penguins: “Drift,” “slant” and singular verb forms following existentials in New Zealand and Falkland Island English. In Jones, M. & Esch, E. (eds.), Language Change: The Interplay of Internal, External and Extralinguistic Factors, 209–242. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Brook, Marisa, Jankowski, Bridget L., Konnelly, Lex & Tagliamonte, Sali A.. 2018. ‘I don’t come off as timid anymore’: Real-time change in early adulthood against the backdrop of the community. Journal of Sociolinguistics 22(4). 351–374. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12310.Google Scholar

Brownstein, Michael & Saul, Jennifer. 2016. Implicit Bias and Philosophy, Volume 1: Metaphysics and Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bucholtz, Mary. 1996. Geek the girl: Language, femininity, and female nerds. In Ahlers, Jocelyn, Bilmes, Leela, Chen, Melinda, Oliver, Monica, Warner, Natasha & Wertheim, Suzanne (eds.), Gender and Belief Systems: Proceedings of the Third Berkeley Women and Language Conference, 119–132. Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Women and Language Group.Google Scholar

Bucholtz, Mary. 2002. Youth and cultural practice. Annual Review of Anthropology 31. 525–552.Google Scholar

Bucholtz, Mary. 2011. White Kids: Language, Race, and Styles of Youth Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bucholtz, Mary & Hall, Kira. 2008. All of the above: New coalitions in sociocultural linguistics. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(4). 401–431.Google Scholar

Buchstaller, Isabelle. 2004. The sociolinguistic constraints on the quotative system – British English and U.S. English compared. PhD dissertation, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar

Buchstaller, Isabelle. 2013. Quotatives: New Trends and Sociolinguistic Implications. Chichester, West Sussex and Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Buchstaller, Isabelle. 2016. Investigating the effect of socio-cognitive salience and speaker-based factors in morpho-syntactic life-span change. Journal of English Linguistics 44(3). 199–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424216639645.Google Scholar

Burnett, Heather, Koopman, Hilda & Tagliamonte, Sali A.. 2018. Structural explanations in syntactic variation: The evolution of English negative and polarity indefinites. Language Variation and Change 30(1). 83–107.Google Scholar

Buson, Laurence & Billiez, Jacqueline. 2013. Representations of stylistic variation in 9- to 11-year-olds: Cognitive processes and salience. Linguistics 51(2). 325–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cameron, Deborah, McAlinden, Fiona & O’Leary, Kathy. 1989. Lakoff in context: The social and linguistic functions of tag questions. In Coates, Jennifer & Cameron, Deborah (eds.), Women in Their Speech Communities: New Perspectives on Language and Sex, 74–93. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Cameron, Richard & Schwenter, Scott. 2013. Pragmatics and variationist sociolinguistics. In Bayley, Robert, Cameron, Richard, & Lucas, Ceil (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Sociolinguistics, 464–483. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn. 2011. The sociolinguistic variant as a carrier of social meaning. Language Variation and Change 22. 423–441.Google Scholar

Carter, Ronald (ed.). 1991. Knowledge About Language and the Curriculum: The Linc Reader. Reprint edition. London: Hodder & Arnold.Google Scholar

Carter, Ronald. 1994. Knowledge about language in the curriculum. In Brindley, Susan (ed.), Teaching English, 246–259. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Carter, Ronald & McCarthy, Michael. 1995. Grammar and the spoken language. Applied Linguistics 16(2). 141–158.Google Scholar

Carter, Ronald & McCarthy, Michael. 2017. Spoken grammar: Where are we and where are we going? Applied Linguistics 38(1). 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chambers, J. K. 1995. Sociolinguistic Theory: Linguistic Variation and Its Social Significance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Charity, Hudley, Anne, H. & Mallinson, Christine. 2011. Understanding English Language Variation in U.S. Schools. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar

Cheshire, Jenny. 1982. Variation in an English Dialect: A Sociolinguistic Study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cheshire, Jenny. 1987. Syntactic variation, the linguistic variable, and sociolinguistic theory. Linguistics 25(2). 257–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cheshire, Jenny. 1999. Taming the vernacular: Some repercussions for the study of syntactic variation and spoken grammar. Cuadernos de Filologia Inglesa 8. 59–80.Google Scholar

Cheshire, Jenny. 2005a. Syntactic variation and beyond: Gender and social class variation in the use of discourse-new markers. Journal of Sociolinguistics 9(4). 479–508.Google Scholar

Cheshire, Jenny. 2005b. Syntactic variation and spoken language. In Cornips, L. & Corrigan, Karen P. (eds.), Syntax and Variation: Reconciling the Biological and the Social, 81–106. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Cheshire, Jenny, Edwards, Viv & Whittle, Pamela. 1993. Non-standard English and dialect levelling. In Milroy, James & Milroy, Lesley (eds.), Real English: The Grammar of English Dialects in the British Isles, 53–96. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Cheshire, Jenny & Fox, Sue. 2009. New perspectives on was/were variation in London. Language Variation and Change 21(1). 1–38.Google Scholar

Cheshire, Jenny & Trudgill, Peter. 1989. Dialect and education in the United Kingdom. In Cheshire, Jenny, Edwards, Viv, Munstermann, Henk & Weltens, Bert (eds.), Dialect and Education: Some European Perspectives, 94–110. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Chevrot, Jean-Pierre & Foulkes, Paul. 2013. Introduction: Language acquisition and sociolinguistic variation. Linguistics 51(2). 251–254. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2013-0010.Google Scholar

Childs, Claire. 2017. Variation and change in negation: A cross-dialectal perspective. Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of Newcastle, ms.Google Scholar

Chomsky, Noam. 2017. The Galilean challenge: Architecture and evolution of language. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. IOP Publishing 880. 012015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/880/1/012015.Google Scholar

Chun, Christian W. 2019. Language, discourse, and class: What’s next for sociolinguistics? Journal of Sociolinguistics 23. 332–345.Google Scholar

Cipriani, Enrico. 2019. Semantics in generative grammar: A critical survey. Lingvisticae Investigationes 42(2). 134–185. https://doi.org/10.1075/li.00033.cip.Google Scholar

Constantinou, Filio & Lucy, Chambers. 2020. Non-standard English in UK students’ writing over time. Language and Education 34(1). 22–35.Google Scholar

Coupland, Nikolas. 2007. Style: Language Variation and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Coupland, Nikolas. 2010. The authentic speaker and the speech community. In Llamas, Carmen & Watt, Dominic (eds.), Language and Identities, 99–112. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Crosnoe, Robert & Johnson, Monica Kirkpatrick. 2011. Research on adolescence in the twenty-first century. Annual Review of Sociology 27. 439–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cuddy, Salina. 2019. Can women “sound gay”? A sociophonetic study of /s/ and pitch of gay and straight British-English speaking women. York, UK: University of York PhD dissertation.Google Scholar

Curtis, J. 2016. Shut up! Geezer who runs Essex school is like ‘pupils must stop speaking as if they were in TOWIE.’ The Mail Online. Available from: www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3565133/Shut-Geezer-runs-Essex-school-like-pupils-stop-speaking-Towie.html [last accessed 13 June 2023].Google Scholar

Cushing, Ian. 2019a. Resources not rulebooks. Metaphor and the Social World 9(2). 155–176.Google Scholar

Cushing, Ian. 2019b. Grammar policy and pedagogy from primary to secondary school. Literacy 53(3). 170–179.Google Scholar

Cushing, Ian. 2020. The policy and policing of language in schools. Language in Society 49(3). 425–450.Google Scholar

Cushing, Ian & Julia, Snell. 2022. The (white) ears of Ofsted: A raciolinguistic perspective on the listening practices of the schools inspectorate. Language in Society 52(3). 1–24.Google Scholar

Dann, Holly Rebeka. 2019. Productions and perceptions of BATH and TRAP vowels in cornish English. Sheffield: University of Sheffield PhD dissertation.Google Scholar

D’Onofrio, Annette. 2015. Persona-based information shapes linguistic perception: Valley Girls and California vowels. Journal of Sociolinguistics 19(2). 241–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12115.Google Scholar

D’Onofrio, Annette & Eckert, Penelope. 2021. Affect and iconicity in phonological variation. Language in Society 50(1). 29–51. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404520000871.Google Scholar

Department of Education. 2014. English programmes of study: Key Stages 1 and 2: National curriculum in England. London, ms.Google Scholar

Department of Education. 2017. Unlocking talent, fulfilling potential: A plan for improving social mobility through education. London: Department of Education. Available from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/667690/Social_Mobility_Action_Plan_-_for_printing.pdf [last accessed 13 June 2023].Google Scholar

Dines, Elizabeth R. 1980. Variation in discourse - “and stuff like that.” Language in Society 9(1). 13–31.Google Scholar

Drager, Katie, Guthrie, Kate Hardeman, Schutz, Rachel & Chik, Ivan. 2021. Perceptions of style: A focus on fundamental frequency and perceived social characteristics. In Hall-Lew, Lauren, Moore, Emma & Podesva, Robert J. (eds.), Social Variation and Linguistic Meaning: Theorizing the Third Wave, 176–202. Cambridge, UK and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Drummond, Rob. 2011. Glottal variation in /t/ in non-native English speech: Patterns of acquisition. English World-Wide 32(3). 280–308. https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.32.3.02dru.Google Scholar

Drummond, Rob. 2018a. Maybe it’s a grime [t]ing: th-stopping among urban British youth. Language in Society 47(02). 171–196. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404517000999.Google Scholar

Drummond, Rob. 2018b. Researching Urban Youth Language and Identity. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Du Bois, John W. 2002. Stance and consequence. Conference paper presented at the American Anthropological Association, New Orleans, USA.Google Scholar

Du Bois, John. 2007. The stance triangle. In Englebretson, R. (ed.), Stancetaking in Discourse: Subjectivity, Evaluation, Interaction, 139–177. Amsterdam, NL & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Durham, Mercedes. 2011. Right dislocation in Northern England: Frequency and use – perception meets reality. English World-Wide 32(3). 257–279. https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.32.3.01dur.Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope. 1988. Adolescent social structure and the spread of linguistic change. Language in Society 17(2). 183–207. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500012756.Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope. 1989. Jocks and Burnouts: Social Categories and Identity in the High School. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope. 1998. Gender and sociolinguistic variation. In Coates, Jennifer (ed.), Language and Gender: A Reader, 64–75. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope. 2000. Linguistic Variation as Social Practice: The Linguistic Construction of Identity at Belten High. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope. 2003. Language and adolescent peer groups. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 22(1). 112–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X02250063.Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope. 2006. Communities of practice. In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, second edition, 683–685. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope. 2008. Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(4). 453–476.Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope. 2011. Language and power in the preadolescent heterosexual market. American Speech 86(1). 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-1277528.Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope. 2014. Language and gender in adolescence. In Susan Ehrlich, Miriam Meyerhoff & Janet Holmes (eds.), The Handbook of Language, Gender, and Sexuality, 529–545. Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118584248.ch27.Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope. 2017. Comment: The most perfect of signs: Iconicity in variation. Linguistics 55(5). 1197–1207. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2017-0025.Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope. 2018. Meaning and Linguistic Variation: The Third Wave in Sociolinguistics. Cambridge and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope. 2019a. The limits of meaning: Social indexicality, variation, and the cline of interiority. Language 95(4). 751–776. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2019.0072.Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope. 2019b. The individual in the semiotic landscape. Glossa 4(1). 14. https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.640.Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope & McConnell-Ginet, Sally. 1992. Think practically and look locally: Language and gender as community-based practice. Annual Review of Anthropology 21. 461–490.Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope & Wenger, Etienne. 1993. Seven Principles of Learning. Palo Alto, CA: Institute for Research on Learning.Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope & Rickford, John. 2001. Style and Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope & Labov, William. 2017. Phonetic, phonology and social meaning. Journal of Sociolinguistics 21(4). 467–496.Google Scholar

Edwards, Viv, Trudgill, Peter & Weltens, Bert. 1984. The Grammar of English Dialect. London: Economic and Social Research Council.Google Scholar

Edwards, Viv & Weltens, Bert. 1985. Research on non-standard dialects of British English: Progress and prospects. In Viereck, W. (ed.), Focus on: England and Wales, 97–139. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Eisikovits, Edina. 1991. Variation in subject-verb agreement in Inner Sydney English. In Cheshire, Jenny (ed.), English Around the World: Sociolinguistic Perspectives, 235–255. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Elley, W. 1994. Grammar teaching and language skill. In Asher, R. E. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 1468–1471. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar

Ellis, Alexander J. 1869. On Early English Pronunciation. 5 volumes. London: Trubner & Co.Google Scholar

Fabricius, Anne H. 2000. T-glottalling between stigma and prestige: a sociolinguistic study of modern RP. Copenhagen: Copenhagen University PhD dissertation.Google Scholar

Fergusson, D. M., John Horwood, L. & Boden, Joseph M. 2008. The transmission of social inequality: Examination of the linkages between family socioeconomic status in childhood and educational achievement in young adulthood. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 26(3). 277–295.Google Scholar

Flores, Nelson & Rosa, Jonathan. 2015. Undoing appropriateness: Raciolinguistic ideologies and language diversity in education. Harvard Educational Review 85(2). 149–171.Google Scholar

Foulkes, Paul, Docherty, Gerald. J. & Watt, Dominic. 1999. Tracking the emergence of sociophonetic variation in 2- to 4-year-olds. ICPhS-14, 1625–1628.Google Scholar

Fox, S. 2015. The New Cockney: New Ethnicities and Adolescent Speech in the Traditional East End of London. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137318251.Google Scholar

Fuchs, Susanne & Toda, Martine. 2010. Do differences in male versus female /s/ reflect biological or sociophonetic factors? In Fuchs, Susanne, Toda, Martine & Zygis, Marzena (eds.), Turbulent Sounds, 281–302. Berlin and New York, NY: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Fyne, John. 2005. The dialect of New Mills: Linguistic change in a north-west Derbyshire community. Sheffield, UK: University of Sheffield PhD dissertation.Google Scholar

Gal, Susan. 2013. Tastes of talk: Qualia and the moral flavor of signs. Anthropological Theory 13(1–2). 31–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499613483396.Google Scholar

Gal, Susan & Irvine, Judith T.. 1995. The boundaries of languages and disciplines: How ideologies construct difference. Social Research 62(4). 967–1001.Google Scholar

Gal, Susan & Irvine, Judith T.. 2019. Signs of Difference: Language and Ideology in Social Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108649209.Google Scholar

Gates, Shivonne. 2019. Language variation and ethnicity in a multicultural East London secondary school. PhD dissertation. Queen Mary, University of London, ms.Google Scholar

Geluykens, Ronald. 1987. Tails (right dislocations) as a repair mechanism in English conversations. In Nuyts, Jan & de Schutter, George (eds.), Getting One’s Words into Line: On word Order and Functional Grammar, 119–130. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar

Ghimenton, Anna, Chevrot, Jean-Pierre & Billiez, Jacqueline. 2013. Language choice adjustments in child production during dyadic and multiparty interactions: A quantitative approach to multilingual interactions. Linguistics 51(2). 413–438. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2013-0016.Google Scholar

Giovanelli, Marcello & Clayton, Dan (eds.). 2016. Knowing About Language: Linguistics and the Secondary English Classroom. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315719818.Google Scholar

Givon, Talmy. 1976. Topic, pronoun, and grammatical agreement. In Charles N. Li (ed.), Subject and Topic, 149–158. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Glass, Lelia. 2015. Strong necessity modals: Four socio-pragmatic corpus studies. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 21(2). 77–88.Google Scholar

Godley, Amanda J., Carpenter, Brian D. & Werner, Cynthia A.. 2007. “I’ll speak in proper slang”: Language ideologies in a daily editing activity. Reading Research Quarterly 42(1). 100–131.Google Scholar

Gray, Bethany & Biber, Douglas. 2012. Current conceptions of stance. In Hyland, Ken & Guinda, Carmen Sancho (eds.), Stance and Voice in Written Academic Genres, 15–33. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137030825_2.Google Scholar

Gross, Miriam. 2010. So Why Can’t They Read? London: Centre for Policy Studies.Google Scholar

Guasti, Maria Teresa. 2002. Language Acquisition: The Growth of Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Guy, Gregory R. 1988. Advanced Varbrul analysis. In Linguistic Change and Contact: Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Conference on New Ways of Analyzing Variation, 124–136. Austin, TX: Department of Linguistics, University of Texas.Google Scholar

Guy, Gregory R. 2013. The cognitive coherence of sociolects: How do speakers handle multiple sociolinguistic variables? Journal of Pragmatics 52. 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.12.019.Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael A. K. 1985. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar

Hall-Lew, Lauren, Moore, Emma & Podesva, Robert J. (eds.). 2021. Social Meaning and Linguistic Variation: Theorizing the Third Wave. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hargreaves, David H. 1967. Social Relations in a Secondary School. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Hay, Jennifer & Daniel, Schreier. 2004. Reversing the trajectory of language change: Subject–verb agreement with be in New Zealand English. Language Variation and Change 16(3). 209–235. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394504163047Google Scholar

Hebdige, Dick. 1979. Subculture: The Meaning of Style. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Henley, Nancy M., Miller, Michelle & Beazley, Jo Anne. 1995. Syntax, semantics, and sexual violence: Agency and the passive voice. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 14(1–2). 60–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X95141004.Google Scholar

Henry, Alison. 2016. Acquiring language from variable input: Subject-verb agreement and negative concord in Belfast English. Linguistic Variation 16(1). 131–150.Google Scholar

Hodkinson, Paul. 2002. Goth: Identity, Style and Subculture. Bloomsbury. Available from: www.bloomsbury.com/uk/goth-9781859736050/ [last accessed 2 June 2023].Google Scholar

Hoff, E. 2013. Interpreting the early language trajectories of children from low-SES and language minority homes: Implications for closing achievement gaps. Developmental Psychology 49(1). 4–14.Google Scholar

Holmes, Janet. 1984. Hedging your bets and sitting on the fence: Some evidence for hedges as support structures. Te Reo 27. 47–62.Google Scholar

Holmes-Elliott, Sophie & Levon, Erez. 2017. The substance of style: Gender, social class and interactional stance in /s/-fronting in southeast England. Linguistics 55(5). 1045–1072. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2017-0020.Google Scholar

Horn, Laurence R. 1986. Presupposition, theme and variations. In Papers from the Parasession on Pragmatics and Grammatical Theory, Chicago Linguistic Society, 168–192. University of Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar

Horn, Laurence R. 2004. Implicature. In Horn, Laurence R. & Ward, Gregory (eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics, 3–28. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Huddleston, R. & Pullum, Geoffrey. K.. 2002. The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hudson, Richard A. 1975. The meaning of questions. Language 51. 1–31.Google Scholar

Hudson, Richard A. 2001. Grammar teaching and writing skills: The research evidence. Syntax in the Schools 17. 1–6.Google Scholar

Hudson, Richard A. 2016. The impact of policy on language teaching in UK schools. In Giovanelli, Marco & Clayton, Dan (eds.), Knowing About Language: Linguistics and the Secondary English Classroom, 25–35. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hudson, Richard. 2020. Comment on ‘The policy and policing of language in schools’ by Ian Cushing. Language in Society 49(3). 451–460. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404520000366.Google Scholar

Hughes, Arthur, Trudgill, Peter & Watt, Dominic. 2005. English Accents and Dialects: An Introduction to Social and Regional Varieties of English in the British Isles, fourth edition. London: Hodder Education.Google Scholar

Hunston, Susan & Thompson, Geoffrey. 2000. Evaluation in Text: Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ilbury, Christian. 2019. “Beyond the offline”: Social media and the social meaning of variation in East London. London: Queen Mary, University of London PhD dissertation.Google Scholar

Irvine, Judith T. 2001. “Style” as distinctiveness: The culture and ideology of linguistic differentiation. In Eckert, Penelope & Rickford, John R. (eds.), Style and Sociolinguistic Variation, 21–43. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Irvine, Judith T. & Gal, Susan. 2000. Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In Kroskrity, Paul (ed.), Regimes of Language, 35–83. Santa Fe, New Mexico: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar

Jaffe, Alexandra (ed.). 2009. Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Jeffries, Ella. 2019. Preschool children’s categorization of speakers by regional accent. Language Variation and Change 31(3). 329–352. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394519000176.Google Scholar

Johnson, Daniel Ezra. 2009. Getting off the GoldVarb Standard: Introducing Rbrul for mixed-effects variable rule analysis. Language and Linguistics Compass 3(1). 359–383. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00108.x.Google Scholar

Johnstone, Barbara. 2004. Place, globalization and linguistic variation. In Fought, Carmen (ed.), Sociolinguistic Variation: Critical Reflections, 65–83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Johnstone, Barbara. 2016. Enregisterment: How linguistic items become linked with ways of speaking. Language and Linguistics Compass 10(11). 632–643. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12210.Google Scholar

Johnstone, Barbara. 2017. Characterological figures and expressive style in the enregisterment of linguistic variety. In Montgomery, Chris & Moore, Emma (eds.), Language and a Sense of Place: Studies in Language and Region, 283–300. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316162477.015.Google Scholar

Kearsley, Greg P. 1976. Questions and question asking in verbal discourse: A cross-disciplinary review. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 5. 355–375.Google Scholar

Kefalas, Maria. 2003. Working-Class Heroes: Protecting Home, Community, and Nation in a Chicago Neighborhood. California, CA: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kerswill, Paul. 1996. Children, adolescents and language change. Language Variation and Change 8. 177–202.Google Scholar

Kerswill, Paul & Williams, Ann. 2000. Creating a New Town koine: Children and language change in Milton Keynes. Language in Society 29. 65–115.Google Scholar

Khan, Arfaan. 2006. A sociolinguistic study of Birmingham English: Language variation and change in a multi-ethnic British community. Lancaster, UK: Lancaster University Unpublished PhD dissertation.Google Scholar

Khattab, Ghada. 2013. Phonetic convergence and divergence strategies in English-Arabic bilingual children. Linguistics 51(2). 439–472.Google Scholar

Kiesling, Scott F. 2004. Dude. American Speech 79(3). 281–305. https://doi.org/10.1215/00031283-79-3-281.Google Scholar

Kiesling, Scott F. 2009. Style as stance. In Jaffe, Alexandra (ed.), Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives, 171–195. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kimps, Ditte. 2007. Declarative constant polarity tag questions: A data-driven analysis of their form, meaning, and attitudinal uses. Journal of Pragmatics 39. 270–291.Google Scholar

Kimps, Ditte, Davidse, Kristin & Cornillie, Bert. 2014. A speech function analysis of tag questions in British English spontaneous dialogue. Journal of Pragmatics 66. 64–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.02.013.Google Scholar

Kirkham, Sam. 2013. Ethnicity, social practice and phonetic variation in a Sheffield secondary school. Sheffield: University of Sheffield PhD dissertation.Google Scholar

Kirkham, Sam & Moore, Emma. 2016. Constructing social meaning in political discourse: Phonetic variation and verb processes in Ed Miliband’s speeches. Language in Society 45(1). 87–111. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404515000755.Google Scholar

Klima, Edward S. 1964. Negation in English. In Fodor, J. A. & Katz, J. J. (eds.), The Structure of Language, 246–323. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Kloe, Donald R. 1977. A Dictionary of Onomatopoeic Sounds, Tones, and Noises in English and Spanish, Including Those of Animals, Man, Nature, Machinery and Musical Instruments, Together with Some That Are Not Imitative or Echoic. S Leonard, OK: B. Ethridge.Google Scholar

Labov, William. 1964. Stages in the acquisition of Standard English. In Shuy, Roger, Davis, Alva & Hogan, Robert (eds.), Social Dialects and Language Learning, 77–103. Champaign, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar

Labov, William. 1966. The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar

Labov, William. 1972a. Negative attraction and negative concord in English grammar. Language 48(4). 773–818. https://doi.org/10.2307/411989.Google Scholar

Labov, William. 1972b. The logic of nonstandard English. In William Labov (ed.), Language in the Inner City: Studies in the Black English Vernacular, 201–240. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Labov, William. 1978. Where does the sociolinguistic variable stop: A response to Beatriz R. Lavandera. Working Papers in Sociolinguistics 44. 1–16.Google Scholar

Labov, William. 1982. Objectivity and commitment in Linguistic Science: The case of the Black English trial in Ann Arbor. Language in Society 11. 165–201.Google Scholar

Labov, William. 1984. Intensity. In Schriffrin, Deborah (ed.), Meaning, Form, and Use in Context: Linguistic Applications. Georgetown Roundtable in Linguistics, 43–70. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

Labov, William. 1993. The unobservability of structure and its linguistic consequences. Paper presented at the 22nd New Ways in Analyzing Variation conference, University of Ottawa.Google Scholar

Labov, William. 2001. Principles of Linguistic Change. Vol. II: Social Factors. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Labov, William. 2013. The Language of Life and Death: The Transformation of Experience in Oral Narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Labov, William, Ash, Sharon, Ravindranath, Maya, Weldon, Tracey, Baranowski, Maciej & Nagy, Naomi. 2011. Properties of the sociolinguistic monitor. Journal of Sociolinguistics 15(4). 431–463.Google Scholar

Lacey, Colin. 1970. Hightown Grammar: The School as a Social System. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar

Ladusaw, William A. 1992. Expressing negation. Ohio State Working Papers in Linguistics 40. 237–260.Google Scholar

Lakoff, Robin. 1974. Remarks on ‘this’ and ‘that.’ Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistics Society 10. 345–356.Google Scholar

Lakoff, Robin. 1975. Language and Woman’s Place. New York, NY: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620607.Google Scholar

Lavandera, Beatriz R. 1978. Where does the sociolinguistic variable stop? Language in Society 7(2). 171–182.Google Scholar

Lave, Jean & Wenger, Etienne. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Law, James, McBean, Kirsty & Rush, Robert. 2011. Communication skills in a population of primary school-aged children raised in an area of pronounced social disadvantage. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders 46(6). 657–664. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-6984.2011.00036.x.Google Scholar

Lawson, Robert. 2009. Sociolinguistic constructions of identity in a Glasgow high school. Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of Glasgow, ms.Google Scholar

Lefstein, Adam & Snell, Julia. 2013. Better than Best Practice: Developing Teaching and Learning through Dialogue. London and New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Leith, Dick. 1995. Tense variation as a performance feature in a Scottish folktale. Language in Society 24(1). 53–77. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404500018406.Google Scholar

Levey, Stephen. 2007. The next generation: Aspects of grammatical variation in the speech of some London preadolescents. Queen Mary, University of London.Google Scholar

Levin, Beth. 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Levinson, Stephen C. 1988. Conceptual problems in the study of regional and cultural style. In Dittmar, Norbert & Schlobinski, Peter (eds.), The Sociolinguistics of Urban Vernaculars, 161–190. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Levon, Erez & Fox, Sue. 2014. Social salience and the sociolinguistic monitor: A case study of ING and TH-fronting in Britain. Journal of English Linguistics 42(3). 185–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424214531487.Google Scholar

Levon, Erez & Buchstaller, Isabelle. 2015. Perception, cognition, and linguistic structure: The effect of linguistic modularity and cognitive style on sociolinguistic processing. Language Variation and Change 27(3). 319–348.Google Scholar

Levey, Stephen. 2012. Understanding children’s non-standard spoken English: A perspective from variationist sociolinguistics. Language and Education 26(5). 405–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2011.651144.Google Scholar

Lewis, Mark C. 2018. A critique of the principle of error correction as a theory of social change. Language in Society 47. 325–346.Google Scholar

Lucas, Samuel. 1999. Tracking Inequality: Stratification and Mobility in American High Schools. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar

Macaulay, Ronald K. S. 2005. Talk That Counts: Age, Gender, and Social Class Differences in Discourse. Illustrated edition. Oxford and New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mansfield, Katie. 2022. Is Style Control a Potential Factor in Working-Class Educational Underachievement? Paper presented at NWAV 50, Stanford University, October 2022.Google Scholar

Maybin, J. 2006. Children’s Voices: Talk, Knowledge and Identity. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511958.Google Scholar

McRobbie, Angela. 2000. Feminism and Youth Culture, second edition. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, London: Palgrave.Google Scholar

Medhurst, A. 2000. If anywhere: Class identifications and cultural studies academics. In Munt, S. (ed.), Cultural Studies and the Working Class: Subject to Change, 19–35. London: Cassell.Google Scholar

Meecham, Marjory & Foley, Michele. 1994. On resolving disagreement: Linguistic theory and variation – There’s bridges. Language Variation and Change 6. 63–85.Google Scholar

Mendoza-Denton, Norma. 2008. Homegirls: Language and Cultural Practice Among Latina Youth Gangs. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Mendoza-Denton, Norma. 2011. The semiotic Hitchhiker’s Guide to creaky voice: Circulation and gendered hardcore in a chicana/o gang persona. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 21. 261–280.Google Scholar

Meyerhoff, Miriam & Walker, James A.. 2007. The persistence of variation in individual grammars: Copula absence in ‘urban sojourners’ and their stay-at-home peers, Bequia (St Vincent and the Grenadines)1. Journal of Sociolinguistics 11(3). 346–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2007.00327.x.Google Scholar

Meyerhoff, Miriam & Walker, James. 2013. An existential problem: The sociolinguistic monitor and variation in existential constructions on Bequia (St. Vincent and the Grenadines). Language in Society 42(4). 407–428. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404513000456.Google Scholar

Milroy, James, Milroy, Lesley, Hartley, Sue & Walshaw, David. 1994. Glottal stops and Tyneside glottalization: Competing patterns of variation and change in British English. Language Variation and Change 6. 327–357.Google Scholar

Montgomery, Chris & Moore, Emma (eds.). 2017. Language and a Sense of Place: Studies in Language and Region. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316162477.Google Scholar

Moore, Emma. 2010. The interaction between social category and social practice: Explaining was/were variation. Language Variation and Change 22. 347–371.Google Scholar

Moore, Emma & Podesva, Robert P.. 2009. Style, indexicality, and the social meaning of tag questions. Language in Society 38. 447–485.Google Scholar

Moore, Emma & Snell, Julia. 2011. “Oh, they’re top, them”: Right dislocated tags and interactional stance. In Gregersen, Frans, Parrott, Jeffrey K. & Quist, Pia (eds.), Language Variation – European Perspectives III, 97–110. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Moore, Emma & Spencer, Sarah. 2021. “It just sounds proper common”: Exploring the social meanings expressed by nonstandard grammar. Linguistics and Education 63. 2–14.Google Scholar

Munson, Benjamin, Ryherd, Kayleigh & Kemper, Sara. 2017. Implicit and explicit gender priming in English lingual sibilant fricative perception. Linguistics 55(5). 1073–1107. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2017-0021.Google Scholar

Mycock, Louise. 2019. Right-dislocated pronouns in British English: The form and functions of ProTag constructions. English Language & Linguistics. 23(2). 253–275. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674317000399.Google Scholar

Myhill, Debra A. 2018. Grammar as a meaning-making resource for improving writing. L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature 18. 1–21.Google Scholar

Myhill, Debra. 2021. Grammar re-imagined: Foregrounding understanding of language choice in writing. English in Education 55(3). 265–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/04250494.2021.1885975.Google Scholar

Myhill, Debra A., Jones, Susan M., Lines, Helen & Watson, Annabel. 2012. Re-thinking grammar: The impact of embedded grammar teaching on students’ writing and students’ metalinguistic understanding. Research Papers in Education 27(2). 139–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2011.637640.Google Scholar

Nardy, Aurélie, Chevrot, Jean-Pierre & Barbu, Stéphanie. 2014. Sociolinguistic convergence and social interactions within a group of preschoolers: A longitudinal study. Language Variation and Change 26(3). 273–301. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394514000131.Google Scholar

Nevalainen, Terttu. 2006. Negative concord as an English “vernacular universal”: Social history and linguistic typology. Journal of English Linguistics 34(3). 257–278.Google Scholar

Ochs, Elinor. 1992. Indexing gender. In Duranti, Alessandro & Goodwin, Charles (eds.), Language as Interactive Phenomenon, 335–358. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Office of Population Censuses and Surveys. 1980. Classification of Occupations and Coding Index. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar

Ohala, John. 1994. The frequency code underlies the sound-symbolic use of voice pitch. In Hinton, Leanne, Nichols, Johanna & Ohala, John (eds.), Sound Symbolism, 325–347. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Pabst, Katharina. 2022. Putting ‘the other Maine’ on the map: Language variation, local affiliation, and co-occurrence in Aroostook County English. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto PhD dissertation.Google Scholar

Palacios, Ignacio M. 2017. Negative concord in the language of British adults and teenagers. English World-Wide 38(2). 153–180. https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.38.2.02pal.Google Scholar

Pea, Roy D. 1980. The development of negation in early child language. In Olson, David R. (ed.), The Social Foundations of Language and Thought, 597–626. New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. 1895. Of reasoning in general. In Houser, N., A. De Tienne, J. R. Eller, A. C. Lewis, C. L. Clark, & Davis, D. Bront (eds.), The Essential Peirce: Selected Philosophical Writings (1893–1913), 11–26. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S. & Welby-Gregory, Victoria. 1977. In C. S. Hardwick & J. Cook (eds.), Semiotic and Significs: The Correspondence between Charles S. Peirce and Victoria Lady Welby. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Peirce Edition Project, Peirce Edition. 1998. The Essential Peirce, Volume 2: Selected Philosophical Writings (1893–1913). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Pharao, Nicolai & Maegaard, Marie. 2017. On the influence of coronal sibilants and stops on the perception of social meanings in Copenhagen Danish. Linguistics 55(5). 1141–1167. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2017-0023.Google Scholar

Pharao, Nicolai, Maegaard, Marie, Møller, Janus Spindler & Kristiansen, Tore. 2014. Indexical meanings of [s+] among Copenhagen youth: Social perception of a phonetic variant in different prosodic contexts. Language in Society 43(1). 1–31.Google Scholar

Podesva, Robert P. 2008. Three sources of stylistic meaning. Texas Linguistic Forum 51. 134–143.Google Scholar

Podesva, Robert J. 2021. The role of the body in language change. In Hall-Lew, Lauren, Moore, Emma & Podesva, Robert J. (eds.), Social Meaning and Linguistic Variation: Theorizing the Third Wave, 363–381. Cambridge, UK and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Pollard, Carl & Sag, Ivan A.. 1994. Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Pratt, Teresa. 2018. Affective Sociolinguistic Style: An Ethnography of Embodied Linguistic Variation in an Arts High School. California, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G. & Svartvik, J.. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Quist, Pia. 2021. Multiethnolect and dialect in and across communities. In Hall-Lew, Lauren, Moore, Emma & Podesva, Robert J. (eds.), Social Meaning and Linguistic Variation: Theorizing the Third Wave, 292–314. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Rampton, Ben. 2010. Social class and sociolinguistics. Applied Linguistics Review 1. 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110222654.1.Google Scholar

Rathje, Marianne. 2009. Quotation and quotatives in the speech of three Danish generations. Paper presented at ICLAVE 5, University of Copenhagen. 25–27 June, 2009.Google Scholar

Rauniomaa, Mirka. 2003. Stance accretion. Conference paper presented at the Language, Interaction, and Social Organization Research Focus Group, University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar

Reay, Diane. 2004. ‘Mostly roughs and toughs’: Social class, race and representation in inner city schooling. Sociology 38(5). 1005–1023. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038504047183.Google Scholar

Reay, Diane. 2007. ‘Unruly places’ : Inner-city comprehensives, middle-class imaginaries and working-class children. Urban Studies 44(7). 1191–1201. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980701302965.Google Scholar

Reay, Diane. 2017. Miseducation: Inequality, Education and the Working Classes. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar

Reitemeier, Bob. 2018. The key to social mobility lies in language. Times Education Supplement. 11 July 2018.Google Scholar

Resnick, Lauren, Asterhan, Christa, & Clarke, Sherice (eds.). 2015. Socializing Intelligence Through Academic Talk and Dialogue. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar

Rickford, , John, Thomas Wasow, Arnold Zwicky, , & Buchstaller, Isabelle. 2007. Intensive and quotative all: Something old, something new. American Speech 82. 3–31.Google Scholar

Roberts, Julie. 1997. The acquisition of sociolinguistic variation: A study of (-t, d) deletion in preschool children. Journal of Child Language 24. 351–372.Google Scholar

Robinson, Mary. 2021. Negative concord as a window into the social perception of (morpho-) syntactic variables. Research talk presented at the Linguistics Seminar Series, University of Newcastle. Available from: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FjEPd2535VZtAakn7PRsqKy_K1SxheiA/view [last accessed 2 June 2023].Google Scholar

Romaine, Suzanne. 1984. On the problem of syntactic variation and pragmatic meaning in sociolinguistic theory. Folia Linguistica 18(3–4). 409–438.Google Scholar

Rosa, Jonathan & Flores, Nelson. 2017. Unsettling race and language: Toward a raciolinguistic perspective. Language in Society 46(5). 621–647. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404517000562.Google Scholar

Rosen, Michael. 2021. Dear Gavin Williamson, could you tell parents what a fronted adverbial is? The Guardian, sec. Education. Available from: www.theguardian.com/education/2021/jan/23/dear-gavin-williamson-could-you-tell-parents-what-a-fronted-adverbial-is [last accessed 13 June 2023].Google Scholar

Sacks, Harvey, Schegloff, Emanuel & Jefferson, Gail. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50. 696–735.Google Scholar

Schilling, Natalie. 2013. Investigating stylistic variation. In Chambers, J. K. & Schilling, Natalie (eds.), The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, second edition, 325–349. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Schilling-Estes, Natalie & Wolfram, Walt. 1994. Convergent explanation and alternative regularization patterns: _Were/weren’t_ levelling in a vernacular English variety. Language Variation and Change 6. 273–302.Google Scholar

Schleef, Erik. 2013. Glottal replacement of /t/ in two British capitals: Effects of word frequency and morphological compositionality. Language Variation and Change 25. 201–223.Google Scholar

Sharma, Devyani. 2018. Style dominance: Attention, audience, and the ‘real me.’ Language in Society 47(1). 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404517000835.Google Scholar

Sharma, Devyani. 2021. Biographical indexicality. In Hall-Lew, Lauren, Moore, Emma & Podesva, Robert J. (eds.), Social Meaning and Linguistic Variation: Theorizing the Third Wave, 243–264. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sharma, Devyani. 2022. False oppositions in the study of coherence. In Beaman, Karen V. & Guy, Gregory R. (eds.), The Coherence of Linguistic Communities: Orderly Heterogeneity and Social Meaning. London and New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Sheppard, J. 2012. Hiya pupils, please avoid slang, ta. The Guardian. Available from: www.theguardian.com/education/2012/feb/14/hiya-pupils-avoid-slang-sheffield [last accessed 13 June 2023].Google Scholar

Shin, Naomi & Miller, Karen. 2021. Children’s acquisition of morphosyntactic variation. Language Learning and Development 18(2). 1–26.Google Scholar

Shorrocks, Graham. 1980. A grammar of the dialect of Farnworth and district (Greater Manchester County, formerly Lancashire). Sheffield: Thesis, University of Sheffield.Google Scholar

Shorrocks, Graham. 1982. Relative pronouns and relative clauses in the dialect of Farnworth and district (Greater Manchester County, formerly Lancashire). Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 49(3). 334–343.Google Scholar

Shorrocks, Graham. 1998. A Grammar of the Dialect of the Bolton Area: Introduction, phonology. Amsterdam: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Shorrocks, Graham. 1999. A Grammar of the Dialect of the Bolton Area: Morphology and syntax. Amsterdam: Peter Lang.Google Scholar

Silverstein, Michael. 1976. Shifters, linguistic categories, and cultural description. In Basso, Keith & Selby, H. A. (eds.), Meaning in Anthropology, 11–56. Albuquerque, NM: University of Mexico Press.Google Scholar

Silverstein, Michael. 1985. Language and the culture of gender: At the intersection of structure, usage and ideology. In Mertz, Elizabeth & Parmentier, Richard J. (eds.), Semiotic Mediation, 219–259. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Silverstein, Michael. 2003. Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language and Communication 23. 193–229.Google Scholar

Skeggs, Beverley. 1997. Formations of Class & Gender: Becoming Respectable. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar

Smith, Jennifer. 2001. Negative concord in the Old and New World: Evidence from Scotland. Language Variation and Change 13(2). 109–134. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394501132011.Google Scholar

Smith, Jennifer, Durham, Mercedes & Fortune, Liane. 2007. “Mam, my trousers is fa’in doon!”: Community, caregiver, and child in the acquisition of variation in a Scottish dialect. Language Variation and Change 19(1). 63–99. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394507070044.Google Scholar

Smith, Jennifer, Durham, Mercedes & Fortune, Liane. 2009. Universal and dialect-specific pathways of acquisition: Caregivers, children, and t/d deletion. Language Variation and Change 21. 69–95.Google Scholar

Smith, Jennifer, Durham, Mercedes & Richards, Hazel. 2013. The social and linguistic in the acquisition of sociolinguistic norms: Caregivers, children, and variation. Linguistics 51(2). 285–324.Google Scholar

Smith, Jennifer & Durham, Mercedes. 2019. Sociolinguistic Variation in Children’s Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316779248.Google Scholar

Smith, Jennifer & Holmes-Elliott, Sophie. 2022. Mapping syntax and the sociolinguistic monitor. In Christensen, Tanya Karoli & Jensen, Torben Juel (eds.), Explanations in Sociosyntactic Variation, 58–89. Cambridge and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Snell, Julia. 2008. Pronouns, dialect and discourse: A socio-pragmatic account of children’s language in Teeside. Unpublished PhD dissertation. University of Leeds, ms.Google Scholar

Snell, Julia. 2010. From sociolinguistic variation to socially strategic stylisation. Journal of Sociolinguistics 14(5). 630–656.Google Scholar

Snell, Julia. 2013. Dialect, interaction and class positioning at school: From deficit to difference to repertoire. Language and Education 27(2). 110–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2012.760584.Google Scholar

Snell, Julia. 2014. Social class and language. In Östman, Jan-Ola & Verschueren, Jef (eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics: 2014 Installment. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Available from: https://benjamins.com/catalog/hop.18.soc6/details [last accessed 2 June 2023].Google Scholar

Snell, Julia. 2018. Solidarity, stance, and class identities. Language in Society 47(5). 665–691. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404518000970.Google Scholar

Snell, Julia. 2019. Evidence submitted to the Oracy APPG “Speak for Change” Inquiry. Available from: www.snell.me.uk/wp-content/uploads/JSnell_Speaking_for_Change.pdf [last accessed 13 June 2023].Google Scholar

Snell, Julia. Forthcoming. Social class and educational inequalities. In Montgomery, Chris & Moore, Emma (eds.), The Handbook of British Englishes. Oxford and New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Snell, Julia & Andrews, Richard. 2017. To what extent does a regional dialect and accent impact on the development of reading and writing skills? Cambridge Journal of Education 47(3). 297–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2016.1159660.Google Scholar

Snell, Julia & Cushing, Ian. 2022. “A lot of them write how they speak”: Policy, pedagogy and the policing of ‘nonstandard’ English. Literacy 56(3). 199–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12298.Google Scholar

Spencer, Sarah. 2017. Research as working-class resistance: Lessons learned from getting by. Pedagogy, Culture & Society 25(3). 481–486. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2016.1173962.Google Scholar

Spencer, Sarah, Judy, Clegg, Joy, Stackhouse & Robert, Rush. 2017. Contribution of spoken language and socio-economic background to adolescents’ educational achievement at age 16 years. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders 52(2). 184–196. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12264.Google Scholar

Squires, Lauren. 2013. It don’t go both ways: Limited bidirectionality in sociolinguistic perception. Journal of Sociolinguistics 17(2). 200–237. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12025.Google Scholar

Squires, Lauren. 2014. Processing, evaluation, knowledge: Testing the perception of English subject–verb agreement variation. Journal of English Linguistics 42(2). 144–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424214526057.Google Scholar

Squires, Lauren. 2016. Processing grammatical differences: Perceiving v. noticing. In Babel, Anna M. (ed.), Awareness and Control in Sociolinguistic Research, 80–103. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Starr, Rebecca L. 2021. Changing language, changing character types. In Hall-Lew, Lauren, Moore, Emma & Podesva, Robert J. (eds.), Social Meaning and Linguistic Variation: Theorizing the Third Wave, 315–337. Cambridge and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Stein, Ellen. 1990. I’m sitting there: Another new quotative? American Speech 65. 303.Google Scholar

Straw, Michelle & Patrick, Peter L.. 2007. Dialect acquisition of glottal variation in /t/: Barbadians in Ipswich. Language Sciences 29. 385–407.Google Scholar

Stuart-Smith, Jane, Timmins, Claire & Tweedie, Fiona. 2007. ‘Talkin’ Jockney’? Variation and change in Glaswegian accent. Journal of Sociolinguistics 11(2). 221–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2007.00319.x.Google Scholar

Stubbs, Michael. 1984. Applied discourse analysis and educational linguistics. In Trudgill, Peter (ed.), Applied Sociolinguistics, 203–244. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Tagliamonte, Sali. 1998. Was/were variation across the generations: View from the city of York. Language Variation and Change 10. 153–191.Google Scholar

Tagliamonte, Sali. 2006. Analysing Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Tagliamonte, Sali. 2011. Variationist Sociolinguistics: Change, Observation, Interpretation. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar

Tagliamonte, Sali. 2012. Variationist Sociolinguistics: Change, Observation, Interpretation. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Tagliamonte, Sali A. & Temple, Rosalind. 2005. New perspectives on an ol’ variable: (t,d) in British English. Language Variation and Change 17. 281–302.Google Scholar

Tagliamonte, Sali A. & Roeder, Rebecca V.. 2009. Variation in the English definite article: Socio-historical linguistics in t’speech community. Journal of Sociolinguistics 13(4). 435–471. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2009.00418.x.Google Scholar

Thorne, Barrie. 1993. Gender Play. Buckingham, UK: McGraw-Hill Education.Google Scholar

Timmis, Ivor. 2009. “Tails” of linguistic survival. Applied Linguistics 31(3). 325–345.Google Scholar

Toma, Bethany E. 2018. The semantics and pragmatics of right dislocation: Odd thing, that. Undergraduate Research Thesis. Ohio State University, ms.Google Scholar

Tomlin, Russell. 1986. Basic Word Order: Functional Principles. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar

Tottie, Gunnel & Hoffmann, Sebastian. 2006. Tag questions in British and American English. Journal of English Linguistics 34(4). 283–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424206294369.Google Scholar

Trudgill, Peter. 1975. Accent, Dialect and the School. London: Edward Arnold & Co.Google Scholar

Vincent, Carol, Ball, Stephen, Rollock, Nicola & Gillborn, David. 2013. Three generations of racism: Black middle-class children and schooling. British Journal of Sociology of Education 34(5/6). 929–946.Google Scholar

Wales, Katie. 1996. Personal Pronouns in Present-day English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ward, Gregory & Birner, Betty. 1996. On the discourse function of rightward movement in English. In Goldberg, Adele (ed.), Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language, 463–479. Stanford University, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar

Watt, Paul. 2006. Respectability, roughness and ‘race’: Neighbourhood place images and the making of working-class social distinctions in London. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 30(4). 776–797. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2427.2006.00688.x.Google Scholar

Weiner, E. Judith & Labov, William. 1983. Constraints on the agentless passive. Journal of Linguistics 19(1). 29–53.Google Scholar

Wells, John Christopher. 1982. Accents of English: The British Isles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Wenger, Etienne. 1998. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Williamson, J. & Hardman, F.. 1997. Those terrible marks of the beast: Nonstandard dialect in children’s writing. Language and Education 23. 157–168.Google Scholar

Willis, Paul. 1977. Learning to Labour: How Working Class Kids Get Working Class Jobs. New York, NY: Colombia University Press.Google Scholar

Wilson, Brianna. 2022. The social meaning of unbound reflexives. Paper presented at NWAV 50, University of Stanford, October 2022.Google Scholar

Winford, Donald. 1984. The linguistic variable and syntactic variation in creole continua. Lingua 62. 267–288.Google Scholar

Winter, Bodo. 2013. Linear models and linear mixed effects models in R with linguistic applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:1308.5499 [cs].Google Scholar

Wolfram, Walt. 1969. A Sociolinguistic Description of Detroit Negro Speech. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar

Wolfram, Walt & Sellers, Jason. 1999. Ethnolinguistic marking of past be in Lumbee vernacular English. Journal of English Linguistics 27. 94–114.Google Scholar

Wolfram, Walt & Schilling-Estes, Natalie. 2003. Parallel development and alternative restructuring: The case of weren’t regularization. In Britain, David & Cheshire, Jenny (eds.), Social Dialectology: In Honour of Peter Trudgill, 131–154. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Wolfson, Nessa. 1979. The conversational historic present alternation. Language 55. 168–182.Google Scholar

Wright, Joseph. 1905. The English Dialect Grammar. Oxford: Frowde.Google Scholar

Wyse, Dominic. 2001. Grammar for writing? A critical review of empirical evidence. British Journal of Educational Studies 49. 411–427.Google Scholar

Yakin, Halina Sendera Mohd, & Totu, Andreas. 2014. The semiotic perspectives of Peirce and Saussure: A brief comparative study. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 155. 4–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.10.247.Google Scholar

Young, Vershawn Ashanti. 2009. “Nah, we straight”: An argument against code switching. Journal of Advanced Composition 29(1/2). 49–76.Google Scholar

Zeijlstra, H. 2004. Sentential negation and negative concord. PhD dissertation. University of Amsterdam, ms.Google Scholar

Zhang, Qing. 2008. Rhotacization and the “Beijing Smooth Operator”: The social meaning of a linguistic variable. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(2). 201–222.Google Scholar

Zhang, Qing. 2021. Emergence of social meaning in sociolinguistic change. In Hall-Lew, Lauren, Moore, Emma & Podesva, Robert J. (eds.), Social Meaning and Linguistic Variation: Theorizing the Third Wave, 265–291. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Zimman, Lal. 2017. Variability in /s/ among transgender speakers: Evidence for a socially grounded account of gender and sibilants. Linguistics 55(5). 993–1019. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2017-0018.Google Scholar

Ziv, Yael. 1994. Left and right dislocations: Discourse functions and anaphora. Journal of Pragmatics 22(6). 629–645. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)90033-7.Google Scholar

Ziv, Yael & Grosz, Barbara. 1994. Right dislocation and attentional state. In Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Conference and of the Workshop on Discourse, 184–199. The Israeli Association for Theoretical Linguistics.Google Scholar