Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Preface and acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction: Sociolinguistic theory and the practice of sociolinguistics
- Part I Theorising social meaning
- 2 The “push” of Lautgesetze, the “pull” of enregisterment
- 3 Variation, meaning and social change
- 4 Indexicality, stance and fields in sociolinguistics
- 5 Sociolinguistic differentiation
- Part II Language, markets and materiality
- Part III Sociolinguistics, place and mobility
- Part IV Power, mediation and critical sociolinguistics
- Part V Sociolinguistics, contexts and impact
- Part VI The evolution of sociolinguistic theory
- Index
- References
2 - The “push” of Lautgesetze, the “pull” of enregisterment
from Part I - Theorising social meaning
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2016
Edited by
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of contributors
- Preface and acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction: Sociolinguistic theory and the practice of sociolinguistics
- Part I Theorising social meaning
- 2 The “push” of Lautgesetze, the “pull” of enregisterment
- 3 Variation, meaning and social change
- 4 Indexicality, stance and fields in sociolinguistics
- 5 Sociolinguistic differentiation
- Part II Language, markets and materiality
- Part III Sociolinguistics, place and mobility
- Part IV Power, mediation and critical sociolinguistics
- Part V Sociolinguistics, contexts and impact
- Part VI The evolution of sociolinguistic theory
- Index
- References
Summary
Without question the enterprise of linguistics was decisively transformed, in Leipzig, Halle, and elsewhere, by what flowed from the comparative-historical study of Indo-European and other recognized language families. By the last quarter of the nineteenth century, serious scholars in the discipline sought to base generalizing theories about the nature of language on these results, intending to make the speculative philosophizing of Enlightenment savants disappear in the brighter and better light of empirical generalizations about language change that evidence, in turn, how language must function. By the post–Great War twentieth century, language change itself, once the central focus of linguistics – “diachrony” of linguistic systems, in Ferdinand de Saussure's terminology – came to be viewed counterdirectionally through the lens of “synchronic” structural states immanent in the actualized forms and functions of language. And indeed, for the rest of the century until the current day, the presumption of such immanent structural systematicity in relation to the actualized and experienced forms and functions of language has played the central role in investigating language change. Understood as change of the way forms code denotational meanings of language, it is seen as an inevitable outcome of the universal fact of variation in discursive performance within a language community. The synchronically based reimagination of Neogrammarian Lautgesetze has been in this respect variationist sociolinguistics’ key affordance, both in phonology and, more problematically, beyond.
In light of a Foucauldian genealogy of ideas, I will counterpose a more semiotically and social anthropologically informed view of what is termed “variation” in terms of indexicality – the quality of signs such as phonetic parameters to point to aspects of their context of production and reception – and of variation's enregisterment – the frequently only intuitively felt property of textual (“stylistic”) coherence of indexical and other compatible signs one with another in the flow of discourse that defines an abstractable schema, a subgrammar, for context-appropriate and context-effective modes of communicating. Observe that enregisterment partially structures the norms immanent in any measurable indexical effects in the real-time use of language by filtering such indexicality through the lens of form in denotational code.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- SociolinguisticsTheoretical Debates, pp. 37 - 67Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
1975. How to Do Things with Words, and , eds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1972. An attempt at a theory of phonetic alternations. In (trans. and ed.), A Baudouin de Courtenay Anthology: The Beginnings of Structural Linguistics. Bloomington and London: Indiana University Press, 144–212. (Originally published in 1895.)Google Scholar
. 1962. Pour l'analyse des fonctions casuelles: le génitif Latin. Lingua 11, 1: 10–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1926. A set of postulates for the science of language. Language 2, 3: 153–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1939. Menomini morphophonemics. Travaux du Cercle linguistique de Prague (Special issue: Etudes Phonologiques Dédiées à la Mémoire de M. le Prince N. S. Trubetzkoy) 8: 105–115.Google Scholar
. 1991. Language and Symbolic Power. (ed.), and (trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
. 1966. Histoire de la Langue Française des Origins à Nos Jours. Tome 1. De l'Epoque Latine à la Renaissance (nouvelle edition). Paris: Armand Colin. (Originally published in 1906.)Google Scholar
. 2014. Language change, social change, sociolinguistic change: A meta-commentary. Journal of Sociolinguistics 18, 2: 277–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2010. Investigating Variation: The Effects of Social Organization and Social Setting. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 2000. Linguistic Variation as Social Practice: The Linguistic Construction of Identity in Belten High. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2012. Three waves of variation study: The emergence of meaning in the study of sociolinguistic variation. Annual Review of Anthropology 41: 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and . 1992. Think practically and look locally: Language and gender as community-based practice. Annual Review of Anthropology 21: 461–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(trans. and ed.) 1964. A Prague School Reader on Esthetics, Literary Structure, and Style: Selected and Translated from the Original Czech. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
. 1987. Leonard Bloomfield's descriptive and comparative studies of Algonquian. Historiographia Linguistica 14, 1/2:179–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
. 1957. Essays in Linguistics. Viking Fund Publications in Anthropology, no. 24. New York: Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research.Google Scholar
. 1966. Some universals of language with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In (ed.), Universals of Language, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 73–113.Google Scholar
. 1969. Some methods of dynamic comparison in linguistics. In (ed.), Substance and Structure of Language. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 147–203.Google Scholar
. 1968. Linguistics, III: The speech community. In (ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. New York: Macmillan and Free Press, vol. 9: 381–386.Google Scholar
, and (eds.). 1964. The Ethnography of Communication. American Anthropologist 66, 6, part 2.
, and (eds.). 1972. Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
, and . 2004. Introduction: Acts of alterity. Language and Communication 24, 3: 291–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1953. The Norwegian Language in America: A Study in Bilingual Behavior, 2 vols. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1956. Bilingualism in the Americas: A Bibliography and Research Guide. Publications of the American Dialect Society, no. 26. University: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
. 1952. The main features of Cambodian pronunciation. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London 14, 1: 149–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1977. Logical considerations in the study of animal communication. The View from Language: Selected Essays, 1948–1974. Athens: University of Georgia Press, 124–162. (Originally published in 1960.)Google Scholar
. 1931. Prinzipien der historischen Phonologie. Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague 4: 247–267. (Reprinted in French translation, “Principes de phonologie historique,” in Selected Writings of Roman Jakobson, vol. 1. Phonological studies, 202–220. The Hague: Mouton & Co., 1962.)Google Scholar
. 1957 [1971]. Shifters, verbal categories, and the Russian verb. Mimeograph. Cambridge, MA: Department of Slavic Languages and Literatures, Harvard University. (Published in Selected Writings of Roman Jakobson, vol. 2, Word and Language, 130–147. The Hague: Mouton & Co., 1971.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1960. Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In (ed.), Style in Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 350–377.Google Scholar
. 1964. Thèses présentées au Premier Congrès des philologues slaves. In (ed.), A Prague School Reader in Linguistics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 33–58. (Originally published in 1929.)Google Scholar
. 1909. Progress in Language, with special Reference to English, London: Swan Sonnenschein & Co.; New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
. 1946. Mankind, Nation and Individual from a Linguistic Point of View. London: Allen & Unwin. (Originally published in 1925.)Google Scholar
. 2013. Speaking Pittsburghese: The Story of a Dialect. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and . 2006. Mobility, indexicality, and the enregisterment of “Pittsburghese.” Journal of English Linguistics 34, 2: 77–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1969. Historical Linguistics and Generative Grammar. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
. 1971. Historical linguistics. In (ed.), A Survey of Linguistic Science. College Park: University of Maryland Linguistics Program, 576–642.Google Scholar
. 1973. Abstractness, opacity, and global rules. In (ed.), Three Dimensions of Linguistic Theory. Tokyo: TEC, 57–86.Google Scholar
. 2003. The phonological basis of sound change. In and (eds.), Handbook of Historical Linguistics. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 313–342. (Originally published in 1995.)Google Scholar
. 1927. ə indoeuropéen et ḫ hittite. In et al., Symbolae grammaticae in honorem Ioannis Rozwadowski. Cracow: Drukarnia Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego, vol. 1, 95–104.Google Scholar
. 1945/1949. La nature des procès dits “analogiques.”Acta Linguistica [Hafniensia] 5, 1: 15–37.Google Scholar
. 1966. The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
. 2006. The Social Stratification of English in New York City, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1978. Where does the sociolinguistic variable stop?Language in Society 7, 2: 171–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1949. La double articulation linguistique. Recherches structurales: interventions dans le débat glossématique. Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Copenhague 5: 30–37.Google Scholar
. 1955. Economie des changements phonétiques: Traîté de phonologie diachronique. Bern: A Francke.Google Scholar
. 1964. On the potentiality of the phenomena of language. In (ed.), A Prague School Reader in Linguistics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1–32. (Originally published in 1911.)Google Scholar
. 1893. Les lois du langage: I, Les lois phonétiques. Revue Internationale de Sociologie 1, 4 : 311–321.Google Scholar
. 1995. Pour un manuel de linguistique générale. A cura de Fiorenza Granucci. Atti della Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, Memorie, ser. 9, vol. 6, no. 1. Rome: Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei.Google Scholar
. 1998. Nineteenth-Century Linguistics. (ed.), History of Linguistics, vol. 4. London: Longman.Google Scholar
. 1890. Étude sur les changements phonétiques et leurs caractères généraux. Paris: Firmin-Didot.Google Scholar
. 1967. Constraints on variables in syntax. PhD dissertation, MIT.
. 1932. Group. In (ed.), Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences. New York: Macmillan, vol. 7, 178–182.Google Scholar
. 1949a. The concept of phonetic law as tested in primitive languages by Leonard Bloomfield. In (ed.), Selected Writings of Edward Sapir in Language, Culture, and Personality. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 73–82. (Originally published in 1931.)Google Scholar
. 1949b. Language: An Introduction to the Study of Speech. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World. (Originally published in 1921.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1879. Mémoire sur le système primitif des voyelles dans les langues Indo-Européennes. Leipzi[g]: B. G. Teubner.Google Scholar
. 1922. Recueil des publications scientifiques de Ferdinand de Saussure. and (eds.). Lausanne: Payot.Google Scholar
. 1992. The uses and utility of ideology: Some reflections. Pragmatics 2, 3: 311–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1994. “Relative motivation” in denotational and indexical sound symbolism of Wasco-Wishram Chinookan. In , , and (eds.), Sound Symbolism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 40–60.Google Scholar
. 2013. From inductivism to structuralism: The “method of residues” goes to the field. History and Philosophy of the Language Sciences. http://hiphilangsci.net/2013/09/11/from-inductivism-to-structuralism-the-method-of-residues-goes-to-the-field.
. 2014a. In praise of “exceptionlessness”: Linguistics among the human sciences at Bloomfield and Sapir's Chicago. History and Philosophy of the Language Sciences. http://hiphilangsci.net/2014/11/26/in-praise-of-exceptionless-linguistics-among-the-human-sciences-at-bloomfield-and-sapirs-chicago.
. 2014b. The race from place: Dialect eradication vs. the linguistic “authenticity” of terroir. In , , and (eds.), Indexing Authenticity: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 159–187.Google Scholar
. 1972. Sex, covert prestige and linguistic change in the urban British English of Norwich. Language in Society 1, 2: 179–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
. 1935. On Defining the Phoneme. Language Monographs no. 16. Baltimore, MD: Linguistic Society of America/Waverly Press.Google Scholar
(ed.). 1964. A Prague School Reader in Linguistics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
, , and . 1968. Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In and (eds.), Directions for Historical Linguistics: A Symposium. Austin: University of Texas Press, 95–195.Google Scholar
- 46
- Cited by