Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:54:54.415Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

8 - Conclusion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2015

John E. Archer
Affiliation:
Edge Hill College of Higher Education, Ormskirk
Get access

Summary

Edward Thompson's influence on this field and period of history has been immense, and his intellectual presence is likely to remain even after his death in 1994. His Customs in Common (1991) undoubtedly belongs to that energetic and burgeoning field of eighteenth- century studies investigating enclosure, customs and crime. The ‘moral economy’ continues to fascinate academic interest so much that the concept has taken on a life and a direction unimagined by its originator (E. P. Thompson 1971). The research of Randall and Charlesworth (2000), for example, is taking the moral economy concept far beyond the food market, as indeed has Scott who has, in Weapons of the Weak (1985), brought to the study of South East Asian peasants a new sophistication that might usefully be imported to eighteenth-century England.

The study of rural protest has shown itself to be remarkably vigorous and innovative in other directions, not least the unresolved Wells–Charlesworth argument which debated the relationship between proletarianisation and forms of protest. Further work is perhaps required on protest during the Napoleonic war years and the influence or otherwise of paternalism on social relations and resistance. This debate has until now been located in the narrow confines of East Anglia, Sussex and Kent, yet it is apparent that there still remain counties awaiting some kind of preliminary investigation. Even the heavily researched regions and themes would repay further reinterpretation and review. Captain Swing falls into this category, since the extent and complexity of these riots have been underestimated by Hobsbawm and Rudé (1973). The rediscovery of the English peasant and the impact of enclosure, which Neeson's (1993) and Reed's (1984) work has brought to light, will probably lead to further studies. Slow to bear fruit have been the ‘and now to Lower Hardres’ (the first village to break threshing machines in 1830) micro-study village community investigations as suggested by Cobb in his review of Hobsbawm and Rudé's Captain Swing (Cobb 1969).

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Conclusion
  • John E. Archer, Edge Hill College of Higher Education, Ormskirk
  • Book: Social Unrest and Popular Protest in England, 1780–1840
  • Online publication: 05 July 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612299.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Conclusion
  • John E. Archer, Edge Hill College of Higher Education, Ormskirk
  • Book: Social Unrest and Popular Protest in England, 1780–1840
  • Online publication: 05 July 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612299.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Conclusion
  • John E. Archer, Edge Hill College of Higher Education, Ormskirk
  • Book: Social Unrest and Popular Protest in England, 1780–1840
  • Online publication: 05 July 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612299.009
Available formats
×