Habits and the Structure of Motivation in Everyday Life

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511735066.006

4 - Habits and the Structure of Motivation in Everyday Life

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 August 2010

Wendy Wood and

Jeffrey M. Quinn

Edited by

Joseph P. Forgas ,

Kipling D. Williams and

Simon M. Laham

Show author details

Wendy Wood: Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Duke University
Jeffrey M. Quinn: Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Duke University
Joseph P. Forgas: Affiliation:
University of New South Wales, Sydney
Kipling D. Williams: Affiliation:
University of New South Wales, Sydney
Simon M. Laham: Affiliation:
University of New South Wales, Sydney

Book contents

Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Many of the motivational challenges in daily life recur at routine intervals. For example, most appetitive drives (e.g., hunger, sleep) are cyclic, and people act to address them at certain times of the day in certain circumstances. Many other goals, such as getting to work or achieving physical fitness, also involve periodic activities that occur in specific, recurring times and places. This regularity in motivated behavior organizes everyday experience into repeated patterns of goal-directed activities in particular circumstances. With repetition of behavior in stable contexts, actions become automatic in the sense that deliberation about behavior becomes unnecessary. These well-practiced behaviors represent habits, and in this chapter we consider the role of habitual behavior in motivational processes.

A role for habits in motivated behavior was outlined early in classic learning theories, which specified how habits emerge from previous motivated responding and how they structure subsequent motivated responding. For example, Hull (1943, 1950) believed that habits are stimulus— response (S—R) linkages that develop when a given response is reinforcing because it successfully reduces a drive state such as hunger or thirst. This reinforcement increases the association between the stimulus and the response and thereby increases habit strength. Thus, habits orient people to repeat activities that have in the past successfully met motivational needs.

Type: Chapter
Information: Social Motivation
Conscious and Unconscious Processes
, pp. 55 - 70

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511735066.006 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aarts, H., & Dijksterhuis, A. (2000a). Habits as knowledge structures: Automaticity in goal-directed behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 53–63CrossRef Google Scholar

Aarts, H., & Dijksterhuis, A. (2000b). The automatic activation of goal-directed behaviour: The case of travel habit. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 20, 75–82CrossRef Google Scholar

Abelson, R. P. (1981). Psychological status of the script concept. American Psychologist, 36, 715–729CrossRef Google Scholar

Ajzen, I. (2002). Residual effects of past on later behavior: Habituation and reasoned action perspectives. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 107–122CrossRef Google Scholar

Albarracin, D., Kumkale, G. T., & Johnson, B. T. (unpublished). Influences of population and methodological factors on reasoning in condom use: A meta-analysis

Bargh, J. A., & Barndollar, K. (1996). Automaticity in action: The unconscious as repository of chronic goals and motives. In P. M. Gollwitzer & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The psychology of action: Linking cognition and motivation to behavior (pp. 457–481). New York: Guilford Press

Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54, 462–479CrossRef Google Scholar

Bargh, J. A., Chen, M., & Burrows, L. (1996). Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 230–244CrossRef Google Scholar

Bargh, J. A., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (1994). Environmental control of goal-directed action: Automatic and strategic contingencies between situations and behavior. In W. D. Spaulding (Ed.), Integrative views of motivation, cognition, and emotion: Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol. 41, pp. 71–124). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press

Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Muraven, M., & Tice, D. M. (1998). Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1252–1265CrossRef Google Scholar

Baumeister, R. F., Muraven, M., & Tice, D. M. (2000). Ego depletion: A resource model of volition, self-regulation, and controlled processing. Social Cognition, 18, 130–150CrossRef Google Scholar

Brandstätter, V., Lengfelder, A., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2001). Implementations intentions and efficient action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 946–960CrossRef Google Scholar

Brewer, M. B. (2003). Implicit and explicit process in social judgment: Deep and high. In J. P. Forgas, K. D. Williams, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), Social judgments: Implicit and explicit processes (pp. 387–396). New York: Psychology Press

Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. New York: Cambridge University Press

Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2001). Optimism, pessimism, and self-regulation. In E. C. Chang (Ed.), Optimism and pessimism: Implications for theory, research, and practice (pp. 31–51). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association

Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception–behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 893–910CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Dijksterhuis, A., Bargh, J. A., & Miedema, J. (2000). Of men and mackerels: Attention and automatic behavior. In H. Bless & J. P. Forgas (Eds.), Subjective experience in social cognition and behavior (pp. 36–51). Philadelphia: Psychology Press

Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Fazio, R. H., & Olson, R. H. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and use. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297–327CrossRef Google Scholar

Ferguson, E., & Bibby, P. A. (2002). Predicting future blood donor returns: Past behavior, intentions, and observer effects. Health Psychology, 21, 513–518CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley

Frijda, N. H. (1988). The laws of emotion. American Psychologist, 43, 349–358CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Guerrero-Witt, M., & Wood, W. (in progress). Thinking limits on goal success. Research

Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54, 493–503CrossRef Google Scholar

Hay, J. F., & Jacoby, L. L. (1996). Separating habit and recollection: Memory slips, process dissociations, and probability matching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1323–1335Google Scholar PubMed

Heckhausen, H., & Beckmann, J. (1990). Intentional action and action slips. Psychological Review, 97, 36–48CrossRef Google Scholar

Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280–1300CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Hull, C. L. (1943). Principles of behavior: An introduction to behavior theory. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts

Hull, C. L. (1950). Behavior postulates and corrolaries – 1949. Psychological Review, 57, 173–180CrossRef Google Scholar

Kelley, C. M., & Jacoby, L. L. (2000). Recollection and familiarity: Process-dissociation. In E. Tulving & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 215–228). New York: Oxford University Press

Lieberman, M. D., Gaunt, R., Gilbert, D. T., & Trope, Y. (2002). Reflexion and reflection: A social cognitive neuroscience approach to attributional inference. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 199–249). New York: Academic PressCrossRef

Mandler, G. (1975). Mind and emotion. New York: Wiley

McClelland, J. L. (2000). Connectionist models of memory. In E. Tulving & C. I. M. Fergus (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 583–596). London: Oxford University Press

McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (2000). Strategic and automatic processes in prospective memory retrieval: A multiprocess framework. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, S127–S144CrossRef Google Scholar

Ouellette, J. A., & Wood, W. (1998). Habit and intention in everyday life: The multiple processes by which past behavior predicts future behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 54–74CrossRef Google Scholar

Posner, M. I., & Snyder, C. R. R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Information processing and cognition: The Loyola symposium (pp. 55–85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

Quinn, J. M., & Wood, W. (under review). Habits across the lifespan. Manuscript

Reason, J. (1979). Actions not as planned: The price of automatisation. In G. Underwood & R. Stevens (Eds.), Aspects of consciousness, Vol. 1: Psychological Issues (pp. 67–89). London: Academic Press

Reason, J. (1984). Absent-mindedness and cognitive control. In J. E. Harris & P. E. Morris (Eds.), Everyday memory: Actions and absent-mindedness (pp. 113–132). London: Academic Press

Reason, J., & Lucas, D. (1984). Using cognitive diaries to investigate naturally occurring memory blocks. In J. E. Harris & P. E. Morris (Eds.), Everyday memory: Actions and absent-mindedness (pp. 53–70). London: Academic Press

Schooler, J. W. (2002). Re-representing consciousness: Dissociations between experience and meta-consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 339–344CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Shah, J. Y., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2002). Priming against your will: How accessible alternatives affect goal pursuit. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 368–383CrossRef Google Scholar

Sloman, S. A. (1996). The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 3–22CrossRef Google Scholar

Smith, E. R., & DeCoster, J. (2000). Dual-process models in social and cognitive psychology: Integration and links to underlying memory systems. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 108–131CrossRef Google Scholar

Smolensky, P. (1988). On the proper treatment of connectionism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 1–74CrossRef Google Scholar

Thorndike, E. L. (1898). Animal intelligence: An experimental study of the association processes in animals. Psychological Review Monograph, 2 (Whole No. 8)Google Scholar

Thurber, J. (1942). My world – and welcome to it. New York: Harcourt, Brace

Vallacher, R. R., & Wegner, D. M. (1987). What do people think they're doing? Action identification and human behavior. Psychological Review, 94, 3–15CrossRef Google Scholar

Verplanken, B., & Aarts, H. (1999). Habit, attitude, and planned behavior: Is habit an empty construct or an interesting case of goal-directed automaticity? In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 101–134). Chichester, England: WileyCrossRef

Verplanken, B., Aarts, H., Knippenberg, A., & Moonen, A. (1998). Habit versus planned behaviour: A field experiment. British Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 111–128CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Verplanken, B., & Herabadi, A. (2001). Individual differences in impulse buying tendency: Feeling and no thinking. European Journal of Personality, 15, S71–S83CrossRef Google Scholar

Wood, W., Quinn, J. M., & Kashy, D. (2002). Habits in everyday life: Thought, emotion, and action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1281–1297CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Wood, W., Tam, L., & Guerrero-Witt, M. (under review). Changing contexts, disrupting habits. Manuscript