Accidental Limit States

Jeom Kee Paik

doi:10.1017/9781009024471.010

8 - Accidental Limit States

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 January 2022

Jeom Kee Paik

Show author details

Jeom Kee Paik: Affiliation:
University College London

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Accidental limit states (ALS) are one of four types of limit states (described in Section 5.1), and they represent a condition in which a particular structural member or an entire structure fails to perform its designated function as a result of excessive structural damage, resulting from accidents such as unintended flooding, collisions, fires or explosions (Paik 2018, 2020). A range of adverse events may ensue if ALS are reached on a ship-shaped offshore installation, including severe injuries or loss of life among the crew and severe damage to and/or loss of property, with consequent substantial financial losses and environmental pollution.

Type: Chapter
Information: Ship-Shaped Offshore Installations
Design, Construction, Operation, Healthcare and Decommissioning
, pp. 262 - 287

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009024471.010 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bae, M. H. and Paik, J. K. (2018). ‘Effects of structural congestion and surrounding obstacles on the overpressure loads in explosions: experiment and CFD simulations’. Ships and Offshore Structures, 13(2): 165–180.Google Scholar

HSE (2001). Stability. Offshore Technology Report, OTO 2001/049, Health and Safety Executive, London.Google Scholar

INA (2002). Guidelines for the Design of Fender Systems. Report of Working Group 33 of the Maritime Navigation Commission, International Navigation Association, Brussels.Google Scholar

Ince, S. T., Kumar, A. and Paik, J. K. (2017a). ‘A new constitutive equation on ice materials’. Ships and Offshore Structures, 12(5): 610–623.Google Scholar

Ince, S. T., Kumar, A., Park, D. K. and Paik, J. K. (2017b). ‘An advanced technology for structural crashworthiness analysis of a ship colliding with an ice-ridge: Numerical modelling and experiments’. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 110: 112–122.Google Scholar

Johnson, G. R. and Cook, W. H. (1983). A constitutive model and data for metals subjected to large strains, high strain rates and high temperatures. Proceedings of 7th International Symposium on Ballistics, The Hague, 541–547, 19–21 April.Google Scholar

Jones, S. J. (2007). ‘A review of the strength of iceberg and other freshwater ice and the effect of temperature’. Cold Regions Science and Technology, 47(3): 256–262.Google Scholar

Mujeeb-Ahmed, M. P., Ince, S. T. and Paik, J. K. (2020). ‘Computational models for the structural crashworthiness analysis of a fixed-type offshore platform in collisions with an offshore supply vessel’. Thin-Walled Structures, 154, doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2020.106868.Google Scholar

Mujeeb-Ahmed, M. P. and Paik, J. K. (2019). ‘A probabilistic approach to determine design loads for collision between an offshore supply vessel and offshore installations’. Ocean Engineering, 173: 358–374.Google Scholar

Mujeeb-Ahmed, M. P. and Paik, J. K. (2021). ‘Quantitative collision risk assessment of a fixed-type offshore platform with an offshore supply vessel’. Structures, 29: 2139–2161.Google Scholar

Ozguc, O. (2017). ‘Structural damage of ship–FPSO collisions’. Journal of Marine Engineering & Technology, 18(1): 1–35.Google Scholar

Paik, J. K. (2018). Ultimate Limit State Analysis and Design of Plated Structures. 2nd Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.Google Scholar

Paik, J. K. (2020). Advanced Structural Safety Studies with Extreme Conditions and Accidents. Springer, Singapore.Google Scholar

Paik, J. K., Kim, S. J., Lee, J. C., Seo, J. K., Kim, B. J. and Ha, Y. C. (2014). ‘A new procedure for the nonlinear structural response analysis of offshore installations in explosions’. Proceedings of Annual Meeting of the Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, Houston, TX, 22–24 October.Google Scholar

Paik, J. K., Kim, J. H., Park, S. I., Islam, S. and Lee, D. H. (2013). ‘A new procedure for the nonlinear structural response analysis of offshore installations in fires’. Proceedings of Annual Meeting of the Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, Bellevue, WA, 6–8 November.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ritchie, G. (2008). Offshore Support Vessels: A Practical Guide. The Nautical Institute, London.Google Scholar

Ryu, M. G., He, K., Lee, D. H., Park, S. I., Thomas, G. and Paik, J. K. (2021). ‘Finite element modelling for the progressive collapse analysis of steel stiffened-plate structures in fires’. Thin-Walled Structures, 159, doi: 10.1016/j.tws.2020.107262.Google Scholar

Schulson, E. M. (2001). ‘Brittle failure of ice’. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 68: 1839–1887.Google Scholar

Skallerud, B. and Amdahl, J. (2002). Nonlinear Analysis of Offshore Structures. Research Studies Press, Baldock, Hertfordshire.Google Scholar

Timco, G. W. and O’Brien, S. (1994). ‘Flexural strength equation for sea ice’. Cold Regions Science Technology, 22: 285–298.Google Scholar

Wierzbicki, T. and Abramowicz, W. (1983). ‘On the crushing mechanics of thin-walled structures’. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 50: 727–734.Google Scholar

Book contents

8 - Accidental Limit States

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive