Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T19:19:50.867Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 17 - Sex ratios in dioecious plants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 August 2009

Tom J. de Jong
Affiliation:
Institute of Evolutionary and Ecological Sciences, University of Leiden, The Netherlands
Peter G.L. Klinkhamer
Affiliation:
Institute of Evolutionary and Ecological, Sciences, University of Leiden, The Netherlands
Ian C. W. Hardy
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham
Get access

Summary

Summary

Some seeds of dioecious plants develop into male plants and others become females. Brothers and sisters can grow close together in the seed shadow of the maternal plant, which promotes sib-mating, and classical sex-allocation theory predicts a slight female bias among the seeds produced. We describe different ways of examining seed sex ratios and some of the pitfalls involved. The available direct (seed sex ratio) and indirect (proportions of male and female plants in the field) evidence suggests that the seed sex ratio is often close to 0.5, despite the fact that there is genetic variation in the seed sex ratio in some cases. The combination of significant sib-mating and an unbiased seed sex ratio is at odds with classical sex-allocation theory. Genetic conflict theory might provide new insights and should be a central theme in future research. The adult sex ratio can also become male or female biased due to sexually differential mortality, but this does not influence the seed sex ratio.

Das Zahlenverhältnis [0.5] kann aber nur dann rein herauskommen, wenn eine ganze Reihe von Bedingungen erfüllt sind.

The ratio [0.5] can, however, only emerge, when a whole range of conditions is satisfied.

(Correns 1928)

Introduction

Like most animals, but unlike the great majority of plant species, dioecious plants have separate male and female individuals. Both male and female organs develop in each of their flowers, in separate floral whorls, but the development of one type is halted before maturity (Grant et al. 1994), with the timing of the arrest differing between species.

Type
Chapter
Information
Sex Ratios
Concepts and Research Methods
, pp. 349 - 364
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ågren J, Danell J, Elmquist T, Ericson L & Hjältén J (1999) Sexual dimorphism and biotic interactions. In: M A Geber, T E Dawson & L F Delph (eds) Gender and Sexual Dimorphism in Flowering Plants, pp 217–246. Berlin: Springer-Verlag
Ainsworth, C, Parker, J & Buchanan-Wollaston, V (1998) Sex determination in plants. Current Topics in Developmental Biology, 38, 167–223CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alström-Rapaport C (1997) On the sex determination and evolution of mating systems in plants. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae Suecia Agraria, 66
Alström-Rapaport, C, Lascoux, M & Gullberg, U (1997) Sex determination and sex ratio in the dioecious shrub Salix viminalis. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 94, 493–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alström-Rapaport, C, Lascoux, M, Wang, Y C, Roberts, G & Tuskan, G A (1998) Identification of a RAPD marker linked to sex determination in the basket willow (Salix viminalis L.). Journal of Heredity, 89, 44–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atlan, A, Merçot, H, Landre, C & Montchamp-Moreau, C (1997) The sex-ratio trait in Drosophila simulans: geographical distribution of distorters and restorers. Evoluion, 51, 1886–1895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bull, J J & Charnov, E L (1988) How fundamental are Fisherian sex ratios?Oxford Surveys in Evolutionary Biology, 5, 96–135Google Scholar
Carroll, S B & Mulcahy, D L (1993) Progeny sex ratios in dioecious Silene latifolia (Caryophyllaceae). American Journal of Botany, 80, 551–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chailakhyan M K & Khrianin V N (1987) Sexuality in Plants and its Hormonal Regulation. Berlin: SpringerVerlag
Charlesworth, B & Charlesworth, D (1978) A model for the evolution of dioecy and gynodioecy. American Naturalist, 112, 975–997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charlesworth, D & Charlesworth, B (1981) Allocation of resources to male and female functions in hermaphrodites. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 19, 57–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charnov E L (1982) The Theory of Sex Allocation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
Chattopadhyay, D & Sharma, A K (1991) Sex determination in dioecious species of plants. Feddes Repertorium, 102, 29–55Google Scholar
Conn, J S & Blum, U (1981) Sex ratio of Rumex hastatulus: the effect of environmental factors and certation. Evolution, 35, 1108–1116CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Correns C (1928) Bestimmung, Vererbung und Verteilung des Geschlechtes bei den höheren Pflanzen. Berlin: Borntraeger
Cox, P A (1981) Niche partitioning between sexes of dioecious plants. American Naturalist, 117, 295–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Jong T J, Klinkhamer, P G L & Rademaker, M C J (1999) How geitonogamous selfing affects sex allocation in hermaphrodite plants. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 12, 166–176Google Scholar
Dellaporta, S L & Calderon-Urrea, A (1993) Sex determination in plants. Plant Cell, 5, 1241–1251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delph LF (1999) Sexual dimorphism in live history. In: M A Geber, T E Dawson & L F Delph (eds) Gender and Sexual Dimorphism in Flowering Plants, pp 149–174. Berlin: Springer-Verlag
Durand, B & Durand, R (1991) Sex determination and reproductive organ differentiation in Mercurialis. Plant Science, 80, 49–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escarré, J & Houssard, C (1991) Changes in sex ratio in experimental populations of Rumex acetosella. Journal of Ecology, 79, 379–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiala, K L (1979) On estimating the primary sex ratio from incomplete data. American Naturalist, 113, 442–445Google Scholar
Freeman, D C, Wachocki, B A, Stender, M J, Goldschlag, D E & Michaels, H J (1994) Seed size and sex ratio in spinach: application of the Trivers-Willard hypothesis to plants. Ecoscience, 1, 54–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, D C, Lovett, Doust J, El-Keblawy, A, Miglia, K J & McArthur, E D (1997) Sexual specialization and inbreeding avoidance in the evolution of dioecy. Botanical Review, 63, 65–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant S (1999) Genetics of gender dimorphism in higher plants. In: M A Geber, T E Dawson & L F Delph (eds) Gender and Sexual Dimorphism in Flowering Plants, pp 247–274. Berlin: Springer-Verlag
Grant, S, Houben, A, Vyskot, B, Siroky, J, Pan, W-H, Macas, J & Saedler, H (1994) Genetics of sex determination in flowering plants. Developmental Genetics, 15, 214–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, W D (1967) Extraordinary sex ratios. Science, 156, 477–488CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hardy, I C W (1994) Sex ratio and mating structure in the parasitoid Hymenoptera. Oikos, 69, 3–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houssard, C, Thompson, J D & Escarré, J (1994) Do sex-related differences in response to environmental variation influence the sex-ratio in the dioecious Rumex acetosella?Oikos, 70, 80–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingvarsson, P K & Giles, B E (1999) Kin-structured colonization and small-scale genetic differentiation in Silene dioica. Evolution, 53, 605–611CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Irish, E E & Nelson, T (1989) Sex determination in monoecious and dioecious plants. Plant Cell, 1, 737–744CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kay, Q O N & Stevens, D P (1986) The frequency, distribution and reproductive biology of dioecious species in the native flora of Britain and Ireland. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 92, 39–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korpelainen, H (1991) Sex ratio variation and spatial segregation of the sexes in populations of Rumex acetosa and R. acetosella (Polygonaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution, 174, 183–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D (1942) On the evolution of sex in flowering plants. Biological Review, 17, 46–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, D G & Webb, C J (1977) Secondary sex characters in plants. Botanical Review, 43, 177–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynard Smith J (1978) The Evolution of Sex. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Meagher, T R (1981) Population biology of Chamaelirium luteum, a dioecious lily. II. Mechanism governing sex ratios. Evolution, 35, 557–567Google Scholar
Merçot, H, Atlan, A, Jacques, M & Montchamp-Moreau, C (1995) Sex-ratio distortion in Drosophila simulans: co-occurrence of drive and suppressors of drive. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 8, 283–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mutikainen, P, Walls, M & Ojala, A (1994) Sexual differences in responses to simulated herbivory in Urtica dioica. Oikos, 69, 397–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagelkerke, C J & Hardy, I C W (1994) The influence of developmental mortality on optimal sex allocation under local mate competition. Behavorial Ecology, 5, 401–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parasnis, A S, Ramakrishna, W, Chowdari, K V, Gupta, V S & Ranjekar, P K (1999) Microsatellite (GATA)(n) reveals sex-specific differences in Papaya. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 99, 1047–1052CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker GA (1984) Evolutionarily stable strategies. In: J R Krebs & N D Davies (eds) Behavioural Ecology, pp 30–61. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Prentice, H C (1984) The sex ratio in a dioecious endemic plantSilene diclinis. Genetica, 64, 129–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proctor M, Yeo P & Lack A (1996) The Natural History of Pollination. London: HarperCollins
Purrington, C B (1993) Parental effects on progeny sex ratio, emergence, and flowering in Silene latifolia (Caryophyllaceae). Journal of Ecology, 81, 807–811CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putwain, P D & Harper, J L (1972) Studies in the dynamics of plant populations. V. Mechanisms governing the sex ratio in Rumex acetosa and R. acetosella. Journal of Ecology, 60, 113–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raemon, Buttner S M, Schondelmaier, J & Jung, C (1998) AFLP markers tightly linked to the sex locus in Asparagus officinalis L. Molecular Breeding, 4, 91–98Google Scholar
Renner, S S & Ricklefs, R E (1996) Dioecy and its correlates in the flowering plants. American Journal of Botany, 82, 596–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards A J (1997) Plant Breeding Systems. London: Chapman & Hall
Rottenberg, A (1998) Sex ratio and gender stability in the dioecious plants of Israel. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 128, 137–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rychlewski, J & Zarzycki, K (1975) Sex ratio in seeds of Rumex acetosa L. as a result of sparse and abundant pollination. Acta Biologica Cracoviensia, Series Botanica, 18, 101–114Google Scholar
Samitou-Laprade, P, Cuguen, J & Vernet, P (1994) Cytoplasmic male sterility in plants: molecular evidence and the nucleocytoplasnic conflict. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 9, 431–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, B W (1963) The mechanism of sex determination in Rumex hastatulus. Genetics, 48, 1265–1288Google ScholarPubMed
Sokal R R & Rohlf F J (1995) Biometry, 3rd edn. New York: Freeman
Soldaat, L L, Vetter, B & Klotz, S (1997) Sex ratio in populations of Silene otites in relation to vegetation cover, population size and fungal infection. Journal of Vegetation Science, 8, 697–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, D R (1990) Evolutionary consequences of cytoplasmatic sex ratio distorters. Evolutionary Ecology, 4, 235–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, D R (1994) The genetic basis of sex ratio in Silene alba (= S. latifolia). Genetics, 136, 641–651Google Scholar
Taylor, D R (1996) Parental expenditure and offspring sex ratios in the dioecious plant Silene alba (= S. latifolia). American Naturalist, 147, 870–879CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, D R (1999) Genetics of sex ratio variation among natural populations of a dioecious plant. Evolution, 53, 55–62CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, D R, Saur, M J & Adams, E (1999) Pollen performance and sex-ratio evolution in a dioecious plant. Evolution, 53, 1028–1036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, P D (1994) Sex ratio in a stepping stone population with sex-specific dispersal. Theoretical Population Biology, 45, 203–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Testolin, R, Cipriani, G & Costa, G (1995) Sex segregation ratio and gender expression in the genus Actinidia. Sexual Plant Reproduction, 8, 129–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trivers, R L & Hare, H (1976) Haplodiploidy and the evolution of the social insects. Science, 191, 249–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uyenoyama, M K & Bengtsson, B O (1982) Towards a genetic theory for the evolution of the sex ratio. III. Parental and sibling contol of brood investment ratio under partial sib-mating. Theoretical Population Biology, 22, 43–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verdu, M & Garcia-Fayos, P (1998) Female biased sex ratios in Pistacia lentiscus L. (Anacardiaceae). Plant Ecology, 135, 95–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, C J & Lloyd, D G (1980) Sex ratios in New Zealand apioid Umbelliferae. New Zealand Journal of Botany, 18, 121–126Google Scholar
Werren, J H & Beukeboom, L W (1998) Sex determination, sex ratios, and genetic conflict. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 29, 233–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werren, J H & Hatcher, M J (2000) Maternal-zygotic gene conflict over sex determination: effects of inbreeding. Genetics, 155, 1469–1486Google ScholarPubMed
Westergaard, M (1958) The mechanism of sex determination in flowering plants. Advances in Genetics, 9, 217–281Google ScholarPubMed
Williams G C (1971) Group Selection. Chicago: Aldine
Zhang, Y H, Di, Stillo V S, Rehman, F, Avery, A, Mulcahy, D & Kesseli, R (1998) Y chromosome specific markers and the evolution of dioecy in the genus Silene. Genome, 41, 141–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Sex ratios in dioecious plants
    • By Tom J. de Jong, Institute of Evolutionary and Ecological Sciences, University of Leiden, The Netherlands, Peter G.L. Klinkhamer, Institute of Evolutionary and Ecological, Sciences, University of Leiden, The Netherlands
  • Edited by Ian C. W. Hardy, University of Nottingham
  • Book: Sex Ratios
  • Online publication: 06 August 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511542053.018
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Sex ratios in dioecious plants
    • By Tom J. de Jong, Institute of Evolutionary and Ecological Sciences, University of Leiden, The Netherlands, Peter G.L. Klinkhamer, Institute of Evolutionary and Ecological, Sciences, University of Leiden, The Netherlands
  • Edited by Ian C. W. Hardy, University of Nottingham
  • Book: Sex Ratios
  • Online publication: 06 August 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511542053.018
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Sex ratios in dioecious plants
    • By Tom J. de Jong, Institute of Evolutionary and Ecological Sciences, University of Leiden, The Netherlands, Peter G.L. Klinkhamer, Institute of Evolutionary and Ecological, Sciences, University of Leiden, The Netherlands
  • Edited by Ian C. W. Hardy, University of Nottingham
  • Book: Sex Ratios
  • Online publication: 06 August 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511542053.018
Available formats
×