Abbas, Hassan. ‘From Fata to the NWFP: The Taliban Spread Their Grip in Pakistan’. CTC Sentinel 1, no. 10 (2008).Google Scholar

Abeyratne, Rehan, and Porat, Iddo, eds. Towering Judges: A Comparative Study of Constitutional Judges. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021.Google Scholar

Andhyarujina, Tehmtan. ‘A Committed Judiciary’. In Appointment of Judges to the Supreme Court of India, edited by Sengupta, Arghya and Sharma, Ritwika, 18–30. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Arafat, Alaa Al-Din. The Rise of Islamism in Egypt. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017.Google Scholar

Arold, Nina-Louisa. The Legal Culture of the European Court of Human Rights. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2007.Google Scholar

Asian Development Bank. ‘Private Sector Assessment Pakistan’. 2008. www.adb.org/sites/default/files/institutional-document/32216/private-sector-assessment.pdf.Google Scholar

Azeem, Muhammad. Law, State and Inequality in Pakistan: Explaining the Rise of the Judiciary. Singapore: Springer International Publishing, 2017.Google Scholar

Aziz, Sadaf. ‘Liberal Protagonists: The Lawyers’ Movement in Pakistan’. In Fates of Political Liberalism in the British Post-colony: The Politics of the Legal Complex, edited by Halliday, Terrence, Karpik, Lucien, and Feeley, Malcolm, 305–39. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Aziz, Sadaf. ‘The Politics of Anti-corruption’. In The Politics and Jurisprudence of the Chaudhry Court, edited by Cheema, Moeen and Gilani, Ijaz Shafi, 253–80. Karachi: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Aziz, Sadaf, and Cheema, Moeen. ‘From Nation to State: Constitutional Founding in Pakistan’. In Constitutional Foundings in South Asia, edited by Tan, Kevin and Hoque, Ridwan, 63–90. London: Hart Publishing, 2021.Google Scholar

Aziz, Sahar. Egypt’s Judiciary, Coopted. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2014.Google Scholar

Aziz, Sahar. ‘Independence without Accountability: The Judicial Paradox of Egypt’s Failed Transition to Democracy’. Penn State Law Review 120 (2016): 101–70.Google Scholar

Bali, Asli. ‘The Perils of Judicial Independence: Constitutional Transition and the Turkish Example’. Virginia Journal of International Law 52 (2012): 235–320.Google Scholar

Barros, Robert. ‘Courts out of Context: Authoritarian Sources of Judicial Failure in Chile (1973–1990) and Argentina (1976–1983)’. In Rule by Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes, edited by Ginsburg, Tom and Moustafa, Tamir, 156–79. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Barroso, Roberto Luis, and Osorio, Aline. ‘Democracy, Political Crisis and Constitutional Jurisdiction’. In Judicial Power: Constitutional Courts Affect Political Transformations, edited by Landfried, Christine, 163–82. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.Google Scholar

Baum, Lawrence. Judges and Their Audiences. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Baum, Lawrence. The Puzzle of Judicial Behavior. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Belge, Ceren. ‘Friends of the Court: The Republican Alliance and Selective Activism’. Law and Social Inquiry 40, no. 3 (2006): 653–92.Google Scholar

Bentlage, Bjorn. ‘Strife for Independence in Autocratic Regime: The Egyptian Judges’ Club 2000–2007’. Die Welt Des Islams 50, no. 2 (2010): 243–77.Google Scholar

Benvenuti, Simone. ‘Judicial Training in Turkey in Light of Constitutional Traditions and Europeanization’. Journal of Civil Law Studies 4 (2011): 309–30.Google Scholar

Bernard-Maugiron, Nathalie. ‘A Clash of Institutions: Judiciary vs. Executive in Egypt’. In Building Rule of Law in the Arab World, edited by Bellin, Eva and Lane, Heidi. Boulder: Lynne Reinner, 2016.Google Scholar

Bhuwania, Anuj. Courting the People: Public Interest Litigation in Post-emergency India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bogg, Alan, and Freedland, Mark. ‘Law in the Age of Populism: Towards Sustainable Democratic Engagement’. Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public and International Law, 2018.Google Scholar

Boix, Carles, and Svolik, Milan. ‘The Foundation of Limited Authoritarian Government: Institutions, Commitment and Power-Sharing in Dictatorships’. Journal of Politics 75, no. 2 (2013): 300–16.Google Scholar

Braibanti, Ralph. Chief Justice Cornelius of Pakistan: An Analysis with Letters and Speeches. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Braibanti, Ralph, and LaPalombara, Joseph. ‘Public Bureaucracy and Judiciary in Pakistan’. In Bureaucracy and Political Development, 360–440. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1967.Google Scholar

Brinks, Daniel, and Abby, Blass. 2018. The DNA of Constitutional Justice in Latin America: Politics, Governance and Judicial Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Brown, Nathan. The Rule of Law in the Arab World: Courts in Egypt and the Gulf. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Brown, Nathan, and Nasr, Hesham. ‘Egypt’s Judges Step Forward: The Judicial Election Boycott and Egyptian Reform’. Policy Outlook – Democracy and Law. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 2005.Google Scholar

Bussiere, Elizabeth. (Dis)entitling the Poor: The Warren Court, Welfare Rights, and the American Political Tradition. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Butt, Simon. The Constitutional Court and Democracy in Indonesia. Leiden: Brill, 2015.Google Scholar

Caldeira, Gregory. ‘Neither the Purse nor the Sword: Dynamics of Public Support in the Supreme Court’. American Political Science Review 80, no. 4 (1986): 1209–26.Google Scholar

Caldeira, Gregory, and Gibson, James. ‘The Legitimacy of Justice in the European Union: Models of Institutional Support’. American Political Science Review 89 (1995): 356–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carruba, Clifford, and Gabel, Matthew. International Courts and the Performance of International Agreements: A General Theory with Evidence from the European Union. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Cass, Roland. ‘Judging: Norms and Incentives of Retrospective Decision-Making’. Boston University Law Review 75 (1995): 941–96.Google Scholar

Chandrachud, Abhinav. ‘An Empirical Study of the Supreme Court’s Composition’. Economic and Political Weekly 46, no. 1 (2011): 71–7.Google Scholar

Chandrachud, Abhinav. The Informal Constitution: Unwritten Criteria in Selecting Judges for the Supreme Court of India. Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2014.Google Scholar

Chanock, Martin. The Making of South African Legal Culture 1902–1936: Fear, Favour and Prejudice. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Chaudhry, Nazir Husain. Chief Justice Muhammad Munir: His Life, Writings and Judgments. Lahore: Research Society of Pakistan, 1973.Google Scholar

Chavez, Rebecca Bill. The Rule of Law in Nascent Democracies. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Cheema, Moeen. Courting Constitutionalism: Politics of Public Law and Judicial Review in Pakistan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021.Google Scholar

Cheema, Moeen. ‘Pakistan: The State of Liberal Democracy’. International Journal of Constitutional Law 16, no. 2 (2018a): 635–42.Google Scholar

Cheema, Moeen. ‘Two Steps Forward One Step Back: The Non-linear Expansion of Judicial Power in Pakistan’. International Journal of Constitutional Law 16, no. 2 (2018b): 503–26.Google Scholar

Clayton, Cornell, and Gillman, Howard, eds. Supreme Court Decision-Making: New Institutionalist Approaches. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Cornelius, A. R., and Haider, S. M.. Law and Judiciary in Pakistan. Lahore: Lahore Law Times Publishing Company, 1981.Google Scholar

Couso, Javier, Huneeus, Alexander, and Sieder, Rachel, eds. Cultures of Legality: Judicialization and Political Activity in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Couso, Javier, and Hilbink, Lisa. ‘From Quietism to Incipient Activism: The Institutional and Ideological Roots of RIghts Adjudication in Chile’. In Courts in Latin America, edited by Helmke, Gretchen and Rios-Figueroa, Julio, 99–127. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Croissant, Aurel, Keuhn, David, and Wolf, Seigfried. ‘Beyond the Fallacy of Coupism: Conceptualizing Civilian Control of the Military in Emerging Democracies’. Democratization 17, no. 5 (2010): 950–75.Google Scholar

Crouch, Melissa. ‘Pre-emptive Constitution Making: Authoritarian Constitutionalism and the Military in Myanmar’. Law and Society Review 54, no. 2 (2020): 487–515.Google Scholar

Davis, Sue. ‘The Chief Justice and Judicial Decision-Making: The Institutional Basis for Leadership on the Supreme Court’. In Supreme Court Decision-Making: New Institutionalist Approaches, edited by Clayton, Cornell and Gillman, Howard, 135–54. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Dhavan, Rajeev. ‘Law as Struggle: Public Interest Litigation in India’. Journal of the Indian Law Institute 36, no. 3 (1994): 302–38.Google Scholar

Drahozal, Christopher. ‘Judicial Incentives and the Appeals Process’. SMU Law Review 51 (1998): 469.Google Scholar

Dressel, Bjorn, Sanchez-Urribarri, Raul, and Stroh, Alexander. ‘The Informal Dimensions of Judicial Politics: A Relational Perspective’. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 13 (2017): 413–30.Google Scholar

Dyevre, Arthur. ‘Unifying the Field of Comparative Judicial Politics: Towards a General Theory of Judicial Behaviour’. European Political Science Review 2, no. 2 (2010): 297–327.Google Scholar

Edelman, Martin. ‘The Judicial Elite of Israel’. International Political Science Review 13, no. 3 (1992): 235–48.Google Scholar

El-Ghobashy, Mona. ‘Dissidence and Deference among Egyptian Judges’. Middle East Report 46 (2016). www.merip.org/mer/mer279/dissidence-deference-among-egyptian-judges.Google Scholar

Eldem, Tuba. ‘Guardians Entrapped: The Demise of the Turkish Armed Forces as a Veto-Player’. Doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto, 2013.Google Scholar

Epp, Charles. The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Epstein, Lee, and Knight, Jack. The Choices Justices Make. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly, 1998.Google Scholar

Epstein, Lee, and Knight, Jack. ‘Reconsidering Judicial Preferences’. Annual Review of Political Science 16 (2012): 11–31.Google Scholar

Epstein, Lee, Knight, Jack, and Shvetsova, Olga. ‘The Role of Constitutional Courts in Establishment and Maintenance of Democratic Systems of Government’. Law and Society Review 35, no. 1 (2001): 117–64.Google Scholar

Ferejohn, John, Rosenbluth, Frances, and Shipan, Charles. ‘Comparative Judicial Politics’. In Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics, edited by Boix, Carles and Stokes, Susan, 727–51. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Freedom House. ‘Freedom in the World 2020: Pakistan Country Report’. 2020. https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/2020-02/FIW_2020_REPORT_BOOKLET_Final.pdf.Google Scholar

Gadbois, George. Judges of the Supreme Court of India: 1950–1989. Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Gandhi, Jennifer, and Lust-Okar, Ellen. ‘Elections under Authoritarianism’. Annual Review of Political Science 12 (2009): 403–22.Google Scholar

Gandhi, Jennifer, and Prezworski, Adam. ‘Authoritarian Institutions and the Survival of Autocrats’. Comparative Political Studies 40, no. 11 (2007): 1279–301.Google Scholar

Gardbaum, Stephen. ‘Are Strong Constitutional Courts Always a Good Thing for New Democracies?’ Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 53 (2015): 285–316.Google Scholar

Geddes, Barbara. ‘What Do We Know about Democratization after Twenty Years?’ Annual Review of Political Science 2 (1999): 115–44.Google Scholar

Geddes, Barbara, Frantz, Erica, and Wright, Joseph. ‘Military Rule’. Annual Review of Political Science 17 (2014): 147–62.Google Scholar

Ghias, Shoaib. ‘Miscarriage of Chief Justice: Judicial Power and the Legal Complex in Pakistan under Musharraf’. Law and Social Inquiry 25, no. 4 (2010): 985–1022.Google Scholar

Gibson, James, Caldeira, Gregory, and Baird, Vanessa. ‘On the Legitimacy of National High Courts’. American Political Science Review 92 (1998): 343–58.Google Scholar

Gilani, Ijaz, and Cheema, Moeen, eds. The Politics and Jurisprudence of the Chaudhry Court. Karachi: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Ginsburg, Tom. Judicial Review in New Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Ginsburg, Tom, and Garoupa, Nuno. ‘Judicial Audiences and Reputation: Perspectives from Comparative Law’. Columbia Journal of Transactional Law 47 (2009): 451.Google Scholar

Ginsburg, Tom, and Garoupa, Nuno. Judicial Reputation: A Comparative Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Ginsburg, Tom, and Moustafa, Tamir. ‘Introduction: The Functions of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes’. In Rule by Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes, edited by Ginsburg, Tom and Moustafa, Tamir. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Gloppen, Siri. ‘The Accountability Function of the Courts in Tanzania and Zambia’. In Democratization and the Judiciary: The Accountability Function of Courts in New Democracies, edited by Gloppen, Siri, Gargarella, Roberto, and Skaar, Elin. Portland: Frank Cass, 2004.Google Scholar

Goldthau, Andreas. The Handbook of Global Energy Policy. Oxford: John Wiley and Sons, 2013.Google Scholar

Grewal, Sharan, and Kureshi, Yasser. ‘How to Sell a Coup: Elections as Coup Legitimation’. Journal of Conflict Resolution 63, no. 4 (2019): 1001–31.Google Scholar

Grossman, Joel. ‘Review: Judicial Legitimacy and the Role of Courts: Shapiro’s Courts’. American Bar Foundation Research Journal 9, no. 1 (1984): 214–22.Google Scholar

Halliday, Terrence, Karpik, Lucien, and Feeley, Malcolm, eds. Fighting for Political Freedom: Comparative Studies of the Legal Complex and Political Liberalism. Portland: Hart, 2007.Google Scholar

Halliday, Terrence, Karpik, Lucien, and Feeley, Malcolm, eds. Fates of Political Liberalism in the British Post-colony. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Hamad, Mahmoud. Judges and Generals in the Making of Modern Egypt. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.Google Scholar

Haq, Anwarul. Revolutionary Legality in Pakistan. Lahore: Pakistan Writers’ Co-operative Society, 1993.Google Scholar

Hay, Colin. ‘Constructivist Institutionalism’. In Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions, edited by Binder, Sarah, Rhodes, R. A. W., and Rockman, Bert, 56–74. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Helmke, Gretchen. Courts under Constraints: Judges, Generals and Presidents in Argentina. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Helmke, Gretchen. ‘Regimes and the Rule of Law: Judicial Independence in Comparative Perspective’. Annual Review of Political Science 12 (2009): 345–66.Google Scholar

Hendrianto, Stefanus. ‘The Rise and Fall of Historic Chief Justices: Constitutional Politics and Judicial Independence in Indonesia’. Washington International Law Journal 25, no. 3 (2016): 489–573.Google Scholar

Hilbink, Lisa. ‘The Constituted Nature of Constituents’ Interests: Historical and Ideational Factors in Judicial Empowerment’. Political Research Quarterly 62, no. 4 (2009): 781–97.Google Scholar

Hilbink, Lisa. Judges beyond Politics in Democracy and Dictatorship. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Hilbink, Lisa. ‘The Origins of Positive Judicial Independence’. World Politics 64, no. 4 (2012): 587–621.Google Scholar

Hilbink, Lisa, and Ingram., Matthew C. ‘Courts and Rule of Law in Developing Countries’. In Oxford Research Encyclopedias. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.110.Google Scholar

Hirschl, Ran. ‘The Judicialization of Megapolitics and the Rise of Political Courts’. Annual Review of Political Science 11 (2008): 93–118.Google Scholar

Hirschl, Ran. Towards Juristocracy. Cambridge: Presidents and Fellows of Harvard College, 2004.Google Scholar

Hunter, Wendy. Eroding Military Influence in Brazil: Politicians against Soldiers. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Huntington, Samuel. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Huq, Aziz. ‘Mechanisms of Political Capture in Pakistan’s Superior Courts’. Yearbook of Islamic and Middle Eastern Law 10, no. 1 (2004): 21–37.Google Scholar

International Bar Association’s Human Rights Institute (IBAHRI). ‘Separating Law and Politics – Challenges to the Independence of Judges and Prosecutors in Egypt’. 2014. https://issat.dcaf.ch/download/46595/731261/Egypt%20(Feb%202014).pdf.Google Scholar

Iqbal, Javed. Encounters with Destiny: Autobiographical Reflections. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Jaffrelot, Christophe. The Pakistan Paradox: Instability and Resilience. London: Hurst and Co., 2015.Google Scholar

Jalal, Ayesha. The State of Martial Rule: The Origins of Pakistan’s Political Economy of Defence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Javid, Hassan, and Mufti, Mariam. ‘Electoral Manipulation or Astute Strategy: Explaining the Results of Pakistan’s 2018. Election’. Asian Affairs: An American Review (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/00927678.2020.1855033.Google Scholar

Jillani, Tassaduq. ‘The Challenge of Judicial Independence and the Experience of Pakistan’. In The Culture of Judicial Independence: Conceptual Foundations and Practical Challenges, edited by Forsyth, Christopher and Shetreet, Shimon, 425–42. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, 2012.Google Scholar

Kalhan, Anil. ‘“Gray Zone” Constitutionalism and the Dilemma of Judicial Independence in Pakistan’. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 46, no. 1 (2013): 1–96.Google Scholar

Kapiszewski, Diana. ‘Challenging Decisions: High Courts and Economic Governance in Argentina and Brazil’. Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, 2007.Google Scholar

Kapiszewski, Diana. High Courts and Economic Governance in Brazil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Kapiszewski, Diana. ‘How Courts Work: Institutions, Culture and the Brazilian Supremo Tribunal Federal’. In Cultures of Legality: Judicialization and Political Activism in Latin America, edited by Couso, Javier, Huneeus, Alexander, and Sieder, Rachel. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Karpik, Lucien, and Terrence, Halliday. ‘The Legal Complex’. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 7 (2011): 217–36.Google Scholar

Khan, Hamid. The History of the Judiciary in Pakistan. Karachi: Oxford University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Khan, Maryam. ‘Empowerment without Accountability? The Lawyers’ Movement in Pakistan and Its Aftershocks’. IDS Bulletin 50, no. 3 (2019).Google Scholar

Khan, Maryam. ‘Genesis and Evolution of Public Interest Litigation in the Supreme Court of Pakistan: Toward a Dynamic Theory of Judicialization’. Temple Journal of International and Comparative Law 28, no. 2 (2015): 285.Google Scholar

Khosa, Sameer. ‘Judicial Appointments in Pakistan: The Seminal Case of the 18th Amendment’. In Appointment of Judges to the Supreme Court of India: Transparency, Accountability and Independence, edited by Sengupta, Arghya and Sharma, Ritwika, 242–54. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2018Google Scholar

King, Jeff. Judging Social Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Kumm, Mattias. ‘On the Representativeness of Constitutional Courts’. In Judicial Power: How Constitutional Courts Affect Political Transformations, edited by Landfried, Christine, 281–91. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.Google Scholar

Kureshi, Yasser. ‘Selective Assertiveness and Strategic Deference’. Democratization 28, no. 3 (2021): 604–24.Google Scholar

Lacey, Nicola. ‘Populism and the Rule of Law’. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 15 (2019): 79–96.Google Scholar

Landau, David. ‘A Dynamic Theory of Judicial Role’. Boston College Law Review 55, no. 5 (2014): 1501–61.Google Scholar

Lev, Daniel. ‘Judicial Institutions and Legal Culture in Indonesia’. In Culture and Politics in Indonesia, edited by Holt, Claire. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1972.Google Scholar

Ladinski, Jack. ‘The Impact of Social Backgrounds of Lawyers on Law Practice and the Law’. Journal of Legal Education 16 (1965): 127–44.Google Scholar

Landfried, Christine. Judicial Power: How Constitutional Courts Affect Political Transformations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.Google Scholar

Levasseur, Alain. ‘Legitimacy of Judges’. American Journal of Comparative Law 50 (2002): 43–85.Google Scholar

Levitsky, Steve, and Way, Lucian. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Malik, Muneer. The Pakistan Lawyers’ Movement: An Unfinished Agenda. Karachi: Pakistan Law House, 2008.Google Scholar

March, James, and Olsen, Johan. ‘The Logic of Appropriateness’. In Oxford Handbook of Political Science, edited by Goodin, Robert, 478–97. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Marri, Mir Khuda Baksh. A Judge May Speak. Karachi: Ferozsons, 1990.Google Scholar

Mate, Manoj. ‘Elite Institutionalism and Judicial Assertiveness in the Supreme Court of India’. Temple Journal of International and Comparative Law 28, no. 2 (2014): 361–428.Google Scholar

Mate, Manoj. ‘Public Interest Litigation and the Transformation of the Supreme Court of India’. In Consequential Courts: Judicial Roles in a Global Perspective, edited by Kapiszewski, Diana, Silverstein, Gordan, and Kagan, Robert, 262–88. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Mate, Manoj. ‘The Rise of Judicial Governance in the Supreme Court of India’. Boston University International Law Journal 33, no. 1 (2015): 170–223.Google Scholar

Mehmood, Sultan. 2021. “The Impact of Presidential Appointment of Judges: Montesquieu or the Federalists?” Working Paper for the Program on Governance and Local Development 40. University of Gothenburg.Google Scholar

Mian, Ajmal. A Judge Speaks Out. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Milner, Neil. The Court and Local Law Enforcement: The Impact of Miranda. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1971.Google Scholar

Mohmand, Shandana. ‘Losing the Connection: Party–Voter Linkages in Pakistan’. Commonwealth and Comparative Politics 52, no. 1 (2014): 7–31.Google Scholar

Mondak, Jeffrey. ‘Institutional Legitimacy and Procedural Justice: Reexamining the Question of Causality’. Law and Society Review 27 (1993): 599–608.Google Scholar

Moog, Robert. ‘Judicial Activism in the Cause of Judicial Independence’. Judicature 85, no. 6 (2002): 268–9.Google Scholar

Moustafa, Tamir. ‘Law and Courts in Authoritarian Regimes’. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 10 (2014): 281–99.Google Scholar

Moustafa, Tamir. The Struggle for Constitutional Power: Law, Politics and Economic Development in Egypt. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Munir, Muhammad. Highways and Bye-Ways of Life. Lahore: Law Publishing Company, 1978.Google Scholar

Narayan, Suchindran Baskar. ‘From Kania to Sarkaria: Judicial Appointments from 1950 to 1973’. In Appointment of Judges to the Supreme Court of India: Transparency, Accountability and Independence, edited by Sengupta, Arghya and Sharma, Ritwika, 3–17. Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2018.Google Scholar

Nathan, Barrie. ‘Who Judges the Judges? Judicial Appointments and Disappointments: A Comparative Study of Judicial Appointments with Partiocular Reference to England and Wales’. Journal of Comparative Law 8 (2013): 405–43.Google Scholar

Nazar, Raza. ‘Legislation Is “Required”’. Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal 21, no. 2 (2021): 306–16.Google Scholar

Nelken, David. ‘Comparative Legal Research and Legal Culture: Facts, Approaches and Values’. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 12 (2016): 45–62.Google Scholar

Newberg, Paula. Judging the State: Courts and Constitutional Politics in Pakistan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Newberg, Paula. ‘Pakistan’s Constitutionalism in an Age of Terror’. Asian Affairs: An American Review 43, no. 1 (2016): 1–15.Google Scholar

Ocantos, Ezequiel Gonzales. ‘Persuade Them or Oust Them: Crafting Judicial Change and Transitional Justice in Argentina’. Comparative Politics 46, no. 4 (2014): 479–98.Google Scholar

Ocantos, Ezequiel Gonzales. Shifting Legal Visions: Judicial Change and Human Rights Trials in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Oko, Okechukwu. ‘Seeking Justice in Transitional Societies: An Analysis of the Problems and Failures of the Judiciary in Nigeria’. Brooklyn Journal of International Law 31, no. 1 (2005): 9–82.Google Scholar

Patel, Dorab. Testament of a Liberal. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Pereira, Anthony. Political (In)justice: Authoritarianism in Brazil, Chile and Argentina. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Pion-Berlin, David. ‘Military Autonomy and Emerging Democracies in South America’. Comparative Politics 25, no. 1 (1992): 83–102.Google Scholar

Pion-Berlin, David. ed. Civil–Military Relations in Latin America: New Analytical Perspectives. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Pion-Berlin, David, and Martinez, Rafael, eds. Soldiers, Politicians and Civilians: Reforming Civil–Military Relations in Democratic Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Pompe, Sebastiaan. The Indonesian Supreme Court: A Study of Institutional Collapse. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Southeast Asia Program Publications, 2005.Google Scholar

Popova, Maria. Politicized Justice in Emerging Democracies: A Study of Courts in Russia and Ukraine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.Google Scholar

Posner, Richard. How Judges Think. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Rios-Figueroa, Julio. Constitutional Courts as Mediators: Armed Conflict, Civil–Military Relations and the Rule of Law in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Rios-Figueroa, Julio. ‘Fragmentation of Power and the Emergence of an effective Judiciary in Mexico’. Latin American Politics and Society 49, no. 1 (2007).Google Scholar

Rizvi, Hasan-Askari. Military, State and Society in Pakistan. London: Macmillan Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Rosenfeld, Michel. ‘Judicial Politics and Ordinary Politics’. In Judicial Power, edited by Landfried, Christine, 36–65. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.Google Scholar

Rutherford, Bruce. Egypt after Mubarak: Liberalism, Islam and Democracy in the Arab World. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Said, Atef Shahat. ‘The Role of the Judges’ Club in Enhancing the Independence of the Judiciary and Spurring Political Reform’. In Judges and Political Reform in Egypt, edited by Bernard-Maugiron, Nathalie, 111–32. Cairo: American University in Cairo Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Scheb, John, and Lyons, William. ‘The Myth of Legality and Public Evaluation of the Supreme Court’. Social Science Quarterly 81, no. 4 (2000): 928–40.Google Scholar

Schepelle, Kim Lane. ‘Constitutional Negotiations: Political Context of Judicial Activism in Post-Soviet Europe’. International Sociology 18, no. 1 (2003): 219–38.Google Scholar

Schofield, Victoria. Bhutto: Trial and Execution. London: Cassell, 1979.Google Scholar

Segal, Jeffrey. ‘Judicial Behavior’. In Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics, edited by Gregory Caldeira, R. Daniel Kellerman, , and Whittington, Keith. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Segal, Jeffrey, and Spaeth, Harold. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Shafqat, Sahar. ‘Civil Society and the Lawyers’ Movement of Pakistan’. Law and Social Inquiry 43, no. 3 (2017): 889–914.Google Scholar

Shah, Aqil. The Army and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2014a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shah, Aqil. ‘Constraining Consolidation: Military, Politics and Democracy in Pakistan (2007–2013)’. Democratization 21, no. 6 (2014b): 1007–33.Google Scholar

Shah, Aqil. ‘Pakistan: Voting under Military Tutelage’. Journal of Democracy 30, no. 1 (2019): 128–42.Google Scholar

Shah, Nasim Hasan. Memoirs and Reflections. Lahore: Alhamra, 2002.Google Scholar

Shambayati, Hootan. ‘Courts in Semi-democratic/Authoritarian Regimes: The Judicialization of Turkish (and Iranian) Politics’. In Rule by Law: The Politics of Courts in Authoritarian Regimes, edited by Ginsburg, Tom and Moustafa, Tamir, 283–303. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Shambayati, Hootan, and Kirdis, Esen. ‘In “Pursuit of Contemporary Civilization”: Judicial Empowerment in Turkey’. Political Research Quarterly 62 , no. 4 (2009): 767–80.Google Scholar

Siddiqa, Ayesha. Military Inc.: Inside Pakistan’s Military Economy. Ann Arbor: Pluto Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Siddiqi, Faisal. ‘Public Interest Litigation: Predictable Continuity and Radical Departures’. In The Politics and the Jurisprudence of the Chaudhry Court, edited by Cheema, Moeen and Gilani, Ijaz Shafi, 77–130. Karachi: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Siddique, Osama. ‘Judicialization of Politics: Pakistan Supreme Court’s Jurisprudence after the Lawyer’s Movement’. In Unstable Constitutionalism: Law and Politics in South Asia, edited by Tushnet, Mark and , Madhav, 159–91. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Siddique, Osama. ‘The Jurisprudence of Dissolutions: Presidential Power to Dissolve Assemblies under the Pakistani Constitution and Its Discontents’. Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law 23, no. 3 (2006): 622–715.Google Scholar

Siddique, Osama. ‘Legal Education in Pakistan: The Domination of Practitioners and the “Critically Endangered” Academic’. Journal of Legal Education 63 (2014): 499.Google Scholar

Siddique, Osama. Pakistan’s Experience with Formal Law: An Alien Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Sidhwa, Rustam. The Lahore High Court and Its Principal Bar: 1866–1988. Lahore: Maktaba Jadeed, 1989.Google Scholar

Staton, Jeffrey. Judicial Power and Strategic Communication in Mexico. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Stepan, Alfred. Rethinking Military Politics: Brazil and the Southern Cone. New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Stokke, Olav. The Interplay of International Regimes: Putting Effectiveness Theory to Work. Lysaker: The Fridtjob Nansen Institute, 2001.Google Scholar

Stone, Alec. The Birth of Judicial Politics in France. New York: Oxford University Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Taharia, Jose. ‘Judicial Independence in an Authoritarian Regime: The Case of Contemporary Spain’. Law and Society Review 9, no. 3 (1975): 475–96.Google Scholar

Talbot, Ian. Pakistan: A Modern History. London: Hurst and Co., 1998.Google Scholar

Teitel, Ruti. ‘Humanity’s Law: Rule of Law for the New Global Politics’. Cornell International Law Journal 35, no. 2 (2001): 355–87.Google Scholar

Tezkur, Gunes Murat. ‘Judicial Activism in Perilous Times: The Turkish Case’. Law and Social Inquiry 43, no. 2 (2009): 305–36.Google Scholar

Trochev, Alexei. Judging Russia: Constitutional Court in Russian Politics 1990–2006. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Trochev, Alexei, and Ellett, Rachel. ‘Judges and Their Allies: Rethinking Judicial Autonomy through the Prism of Off-bench Resistance’. Journal of Law and Courts 2, no. 1 (2014): 67–91.Google Scholar

Tsebelis, George. Veto Player: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Tudor, Maya. ‘Explaining Democracy’s Origins: Lessons from South Asia’. Comparative Politics 45, no. 3 (2013): 253–72.Google Scholar

Tyler, Tom. ‘Law and Pyschology’. In Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics, edited by Keith Whittington, R. Daniel Kellerman, , and Caldeira, Gregory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Urribarri, Raul Sanchez. ‘Politicization of the Judiciary via Informal Connections’. In Legitimacy, Legal Development and Change: Law and Modernization Reconsidered, edited by Linnan, David, 307–22. New York: Routledge, 2012.Google Scholar

Vanberg, Georg. ‘Constitutional Courts in Comparative Perspective: A Theoretical Assessment’. Annual Review of Political Science 18 (2015): 167–85.Google Scholar

Vanberg, Georg. ‘Establishing Judicial Independence in Germany: The Impact of Opinion Leadership and the Separation of Powers’. Comparative Politics 32, no. 3 (2000): 333–53.Google Scholar

Vanberg, Georg. Politics of Constitutional Review in Germany. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Vondoepp, Peter. ‘Political and Judicial Assertiveness in Emerging Democracies: High Court Behavior in Malawi and Zambia’. Political Research Quarterly 59 , no. 3 (2006).Google Scholar

Waseem, Mohammad. ‘Constitutionalism and Extra-constitutionalism in Pakistan’. In Unstable Constitutionalism: Law and Politics in South Asia, edited by Tushnet, Mark and Khosla, Madhav, 124–58. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Waseem, Mohammad. ‘Judging Democracy in Pakistan: Conflict between the Executive and Judiciary’. Contemporary South Asia 20, no. 1 (2012): 19–31.Google Scholar

Waseem, Zoha. ‘“Brothers in Arms”? A Police–Paramilitary Partnership in Pakistan’. Policing and Society 31, no. 2 (2021): 131–47.Google Scholar

Webber, Jeremy. ‘Culture, Legal Culture and Legal Reasoning: A Comment on Nelken’. Austin Journal of Legal Philosophy 29 (2004): 27–36.Google Scholar

Whittington, Keith. Political Foundations of Judicial Supremacy: The Presidency, the Supreme Court and Constitutional Leadership in US History. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Woods, Patricia. Judicial Power and National Politics. Albany: SUNY Press, 2009.Google Scholar

Woods, Patricia, and Hilbink, Lisa. ‘Comparative Sources of Judicial Empowerment: Ideas and Interests’. Political Research Quarterly 62, no. 4 (2009): 745–52.Google Scholar

Zedner, Lucia. ‘In Pursuit of the Vernacular: Comparing Law and Order Discourse in Britain and Germany’. Socio-Legal Studies 4 (1995): 517–34.Google Scholar