Book contents
- Second Language Speech Learning
- Second Language Speech Learning
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Part I Theoretical Progress
- Chapter 1 The Revised Speech Learning Model (SLM-r)
- Chapter 2 The Revised Speech Learning Model (SLM-r) Applied
- Chapter 3 New Methods for Second Language (L2) Speech Research
- Chapter 4 Phonetic and Phonological Influences on the Discrimination of Non-native Phones
- Chapter 5 The Past, Present, and Future of Lexical Stress in Second Language Speech Production and Perception
- Part II Segmental Acquisition
- Part III Acquiring Suprasegmental Features
- Part IV Accentedness and Acoustic Features
- Part V Cognitive and Psychological Variables
- Index
- References
Chapter 5 - The Past, Present, and Future of Lexical Stress in Second Language Speech Production and Perception
from Part I - Theoretical Progress
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 January 2021
Edited by
Book contents
- Second Language Speech Learning
- Second Language Speech Learning
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgments
- Part I Theoretical Progress
- Chapter 1 The Revised Speech Learning Model (SLM-r)
- Chapter 2 The Revised Speech Learning Model (SLM-r) Applied
- Chapter 3 New Methods for Second Language (L2) Speech Research
- Chapter 4 Phonetic and Phonological Influences on the Discrimination of Non-native Phones
- Chapter 5 The Past, Present, and Future of Lexical Stress in Second Language Speech Production and Perception
- Part II Segmental Acquisition
- Part III Acquiring Suprasegmental Features
- Part IV Accentedness and Acoustic Features
- Part V Cognitive and Psychological Variables
- Index
- References
Summary
This chapter provides a critical review of the research on L2 learners’ lexical stress production and perception conducted over the past three decades, which has sought to explain cross-linguistic variability in L2 learners’ ability to reach target-like generalizations in their stress placement and to encode stress lexically. The chapter begins with a discussion of generative approaches to the study of lexical stress in L2 learners, which focused on the influence of the native-language (L1) phonological grammar on L2 learners’ stress placement. These approaches were subsequently challenged by the seminal work of Susan Guion and colleagues, which examined the influence of statistical regularities on L2 learners’ (and native speakers’) stress placement in novel words. The chapter then discusses phonological approaches to L2 learners’ perception and processing of lexical stress, focusing on Peperkamp and Dupoux (2002)’s Stress Parameter Model and the predictions it made for the encoding of stress in lexical representations by listeners from different L1 backgrounds. These approaches were later refined in studies investigating the importance of phonetic cues to lexical contrasts in the L1 for determining whether L2 learners can perceive lexical stress. The chapter concludes with directions for future research on L2 lexical stress.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Second Language Speech LearningTheoretical and Empirical Progress, pp. 175 - 192Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Archibald, J. (1992). Transfer of L1 parameter settings: Some empirical evidence from Polish metrics. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 37, 301–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archibald, J. (1993). Learnability of English metrical parameters by adult Spanish speakers. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 31/32, 129–142.Google Scholar
Archibald, J. (1994). A formal model of learning L2 prosodic phonology. Second Language Research, 10, 215–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Archibald, J. (1997). The acquisition of English stress by speakers of nonaccentual languages: Lexical storage versus computation of stress. Linguistics, 35, 167–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chao, Y.-R. (1968). A grammar of spoken Chinese. Oakland: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Chrabaszcz, A., Winn, M., Lin, C. Y., & Idsardi, W. J. (2014). Acoustic cues to perception of word stress by English, Mandarin, and Russian speakers. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57, 1468–1479. doi:10.1044/2014_JSLHR-L-13-0279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clopper, C. G. (2002). Frequency of stress patterns in English: A computational analysis. Indiana University Linguistics Club Working Papers Online, 2. Retrieved from www.indiana.edu/iulcwpGoogle Scholar
Comrie, B. (1967). Irregular stress in Polish and Macedonian. International Review of Slavic Linguistics, 1, 227–240.Google Scholar
Connell, K., Hüls, S., Martínez-García, M. T., Qin, Z., Shin, S., Yan, H., & Tremblay, A. (2018). English learners’ use of segmental and suprasegmental cues to stress in lexical access: An eye-tracking study. Language Learning, 68, 635–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, N., Cutler, A., & Wales, R. (2002). Constraints of lexical stress on lexical access in English: Evidence from native and non-native listeners. Language and Speech, 45, 207–228. doi:10.1177/00238309020450030101CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cutler, A., & Carter, D. M. (1987). The predominance of strong initial syllables in the English vocabulary. Computer Speech and Language, 2, 133–142. doi:10.1016/0885-2308(87)90004-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, S. M., & Kelly, M. H. (1997). Knowledge of the English noun-verb stress difference by native and nonnative speakers. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 445–460. doi:10.1006/jmla.1996.2503Google Scholar
Delattre, P. (1966). A comparison of syllable length conditioning among languages. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 4, 183–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Domahs, U., Knaus, J., Orzechowska, P., & Wiese, R. (2012). Stress “deafness” in a Language with Fixed Word Stress: An ERP Study on Polish. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 439. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00439Google Scholar
Dresher, B. E., & Kaye, J. D. (1990). A computational learning model for metrical phonology. Cognition, 34, 137–195. doi:0.1016/0010-0277(90)90042-iCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duanmu, S. (2007). The phonology of standard Chinese. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupoux, E., Pallier, C., Sebastián, N., & Mehler, J. (1997). A destressing “deafness” in French? Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 406–421. doi:10.1006/jmla.1996.2500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupoux, E., Peperkamp, S., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2001). A robust method to study stress “deafness.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110, 1606–1618. doi:10.1121/1.1380437CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dupoux, E., Peperkamp, S., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2010). Limits on bilingualism revisited: Stress “deafness” in simultaneous French-Spanish bilinguals. Cognition, 114, 266–275. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.10.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dupoux, E., Sebastián-Gallés, N., Navarrete, E., & Peperkamp, S. (2008). Persistent stress “deafness”: The case of French learners of Spanish. Cognition, 106, 682–706. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.001Google Scholar
Gandour, J. T. (1983). Tone perception in far eastern languages. Journal of Phonetics, 11, 149–175.Google Scholar
Guion, S. G. (2005). Knowledge of English word stress patterns in early and late Korean-English bilinguals. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 503–533. doi:10.1017/s0272263105050230Google Scholar
Guion, S. G., Clark, J. J., Harada, T., & Wayland, R. P. (2003). Factors affecting stress placement for English non-words include syllabic structure, lexical class, and stress patterns of phonologically similar words. Language and Speech, 46, 403–427. doi:10.1177/00238309030460040301Google Scholar
Guion, S. G., Harada, T., & Clark, J. J. (2004). Early and late Spanish–English bilinguals’ acquisition of English word stress patterns. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7, 207–226. doi:10.1017/s1366728904001592Google Scholar
Harris, J. W. (1983). Syllable structure and stress in Spanish: A nonlinear analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Howie, J. M. (1976). Acoustical studies of Mandarin vowels and tones. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jongman, A., & Tremblay, A. (in press). Word prosody in L2. In Chen, A & Gussenhoven, C (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language prosody. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jun, S.-A. (2005). Korean intonational phonology and prosodic transcription. In Jun, S.-A. (Ed.), Prosodic typology: The phonology of intonation and phrasing (pp. 201–229). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jun, S.-A., & Fougeron, C. (2000). A phonological model of French intonation. In Botinis, A (Ed.), Intonation: Analysis, modeling and technology (pp. 209–242). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Jun, S.-A., & Fougeron, C. (2002). Realizations of accentual phrase in French intonation. Probus, 14, 147–172. doi:10.1515/prbs.2002.002Google Scholar
Kang, Y. (2014). Voice Onset Time merger and development of tonal contrast in Seoul Korean stops: A corpus study. Journal of Phonetics, 45, 76–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawagoe, I. (2003). Acquisition of English word stress by Japanese learners. In Liceras, J. M., Zobl, H, & Goodluck, H (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference (GASLA 2002): L2 Links (pp. 161–167). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Kelly, M. H., & Bock, J. K. (1988). Stress in time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 389–403.Google Scholar
Kubler, C. (1985). The influence of Southern Min on the Mandarin of Taiwan. Anthropological Linguistics, 27, 156–176.Google Scholar
Lee, H., & Jongman, A. (2019). Effects of sound change on the weighting of acoustic cues to the three-way laryngeal stop contrast in Korean: Diachronic and dialectal comparisons. Language and Speech. doi:10.1177/0023830918786305Google Scholar
Lin, C. Y., Wang, M. I. N., Idsardi, W. J., & Xu, Y. I. (2014). Stress processing in Mandarin and Korean second language learners of English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17, 316–346. doi:10.1017/s1366728913000333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, T. (1985). Tantao Beijinghua qingyin xingzhi de chubu shiyan [On neutral tone in Beijing Mandarin]. In Hu, S (Ed.), Beijing yuyin shiyanlu [Working papers in experimental phonetics] (pp. 1–26). Beijing: Peking University Press.Google Scholar
Mairs, J. L. (1989). Stress assignment in interlanguage phonology: An analysis of the stress system of Spanish speakers learning English. In Gass, S. M. & Schachter, J (Eds.), Linguistic perspectives on second language acquisition (pp. 260–283). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ortega-Llebaria, M., Gu, H., & Fan, J. (2013). English speakers’ perception of Spanish lexical stress: Context-driven L2 stress perception. Journal of Phonetics, 41, 186–197. doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2013.01.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ou, S.-C., & Ota, M. (2015). Is second-language stress acquisition guided by metrical principles? Evidence from Mandarin-speaking learners of English. In Hsiao, Y. E. & Wee, L.-H. (Eds.), Capturing phonological shades within and across languages (pp. 389–413). Newcastle upon Tyne, England: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Pater, J. V. (1997). Metrical parameter missetting in second language acquisition. In Hannahs, S. J. & Young-Scholten, M (Eds.), Focus on phonological acquisition (pp. 235–261). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Peperkamp, S. (2004). Lexical exceptions in stress systems: Arguments from early language acquisition and adult speech perception. Language, 80, 98–126.Google Scholar
Peperkamp, S., & Dupoux, E. (2002). A typological study of stress deafness. In Gussenhoven, C (Ed.), Proceedings of laboratory phonology 7 (pp. 203–240). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Peperkamp, S., Vendelin, I., & Dupoux, E. (2010). Perception of predictable stress: A cross-linguistic investigation. Journal of Phonetics, 38, 422–430. doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2010.04.001Google Scholar
Prieto, P., van Santen, J., & Hirschberg, J. (1995). Tonal alignment patterns in Spanish. Journal of Phonetics, 23, 429–451. doi:10.1006/jpho.1995.0032Google Scholar
Qin, Z., Chien, Y.-F., & Tremblay, A. (2017). Processing of word-level stress by Mandarin-speaking second language learners of English. Applied Psycholinguistics, 38, 541–570. doi:10.1017/s0142716416000321Google Scholar
Rahmani, H., Rietveld, T., & Gussenhoven, C. (2015). Stress “deafness” reveals absence of lexical marking of stress or tone in the adult grammar. PLoS One, 10 (12), e0143968. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0143968Google Scholar
Sereno, J. A. (1986). Stress pattern differentiation of form class in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 79, S36. doi:10.1121/1.2023191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sereno, J. A., & Jongman, A. (1995). Acoustic correlates of grammatical class. Language and Speech, 38, 57–76.Google Scholar
Sluijter, A. M. C., & van Heuven, V. J. (1996). Spectral balance as an acoustic correlate of linguistic stress. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 100, 2471–2485.Google Scholar
Swihart, D. A. W. (2003). The two Mandarins: Putonghua and Guoyu. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association, 38, 103–118.Google Scholar
Tremblay, A. (2008). Is second language lexical access prosodically constrained? Processing of word stress by French Canadian second language learners of English. Applied Psycholinguistics, 29, 553–584. doi:10.1017/s0142716408080247Google Scholar
Tremblay, A. (2009). Phonetic variability and the variable perception of L2 word stress by French Canadian listeners. International Journal of Bilingualism, 13, 35–62. doi:10.1177/1367006909103528Google Scholar
Tremblay, A., Broersma, M., & Coughlin, C. E. (2018). The functional weight of a prosodic cue in the native language predicts the learning of speech segmentation in a second language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 21(3), 640–652. doi:10.1017/s136672891700030xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tremblay, A., & Owens, N. (2010). The role of acoustic cues in the development of (non-)target-like second-language prosodic representations. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 55, 84–114. doi:10.1353/cjl.0.0067Google Scholar
Vago, R. M. (1980). The sound pattern of Hungarian. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Van der Pas, B., & Zonneveld, W. (2004). L2 parameter resetting for metrical systems. Linguistic Review, 21, 125–170.Google Scholar
van Heuven, V. J., & de Jonge, M. (2011). Spectral and temporal reduction as stress cues in Dutch. Phonetica, 68(3), 120–132. doi:10.1159/000329900Google Scholar
Wayland, R., Landfair, D., Li, B., & Guion, S. G. (2006). Native Thai speakers’ acquisition of English word stress patterns. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 35(3), 285–304. doi:10.1007/s10936-006-9016-9CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Youssef, A., & Mazurkewich, I. (1998). The acquisition of English metrical parameters and syllable structure by adult speakers of Egyptian Arabic (Cairene dialect). In Flynn, S, Martohardjono, G, & O’Neil, W. A. (Eds.), The generative study of second language acquisition (pp. 303–332). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Zhang, Y., & Francis, A. (2010). The weighting of vowel quality in native and non-native listeners’ perception of English lexical stress. Journal of Phonetics, 38, 260–271. doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2009.11.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar