Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T08:10:18.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Federal regulation of Laetrile

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2010

Get access

Summary

Medical science and health care do not exist independently, apart from society. As new applications of knowledge are proposed, some of which will not be totally benign and will be pervasive in their impact, controversies will arise over the distribution of the risks, benefits, and costs involved for different groups that can only be resolved politically. To survive the increasing demands placed on diminishing resources, we must learn to efficiently make the “best” possible political decisions on scientific and technological issues. This seems especially important in health matters, where not only money but life and limb may literally be at stake.

In this paper, I will discuss three issues related to the federal regulation of Laetrile: (1) the federal regulation of drugs; (2) the nature of the scientific and political controversies surrounding Laetrile; (3) the political success of Laetrile. My discussion is not based on formal research and analysis on the Laetrile controversy. I am untrained and unqualified as a medical historian or as a social or political scientist. My presentation is a subjective synthesis of many hours of listening to arguments for and against the unrestricted distribution of Laetrile in two-dozen state legislative hearings, in federal and state courts, and in media “encounters.” I have argued against the distribution of Laetrile.

The underlying assumption of the current regulatory scheme is that defective drug products, or improperly – that is, carelessly or ignorantly – administered drug products may needlessly harm patients. Premarket tests can detect defective products, and instructions for safe use can be given.

Type
Chapter
Information
Scientific Controversies
Case Studies in the Resolution and Closure of Disputes in Science and Technology
, pp. 333 - 342
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×