Achieve. (2004). Do graduation tests measure up? A closer look at state high school exit exams. Retrieved from Washington, DC: www.achieve.org/files/TestGraduation-FinalReport.pdfGoogle Scholar

Adams, R. J., Wu, M. L., & Macaskill, G. (1997). Scaling methodology and procedures for the mathematics and science scales. In Martin, M. O. & Kelly, D. L. (Eds.), Third International Mathematics and Science Study: Technical report (Vol. II: Implementation and Analysis, pp. 111–146). Boston, MA: Center for the Study of Testing, Evaluation, and Educational Policy, Boston College.Google Scholar

Airasian, P. W., & Madaus, G. F. (1983). Linking testing and instruction: Policy issues. Journal of Educational Measurement, 20(2), 103–118.Google Scholar

Anderson, C. A. (1967). Construction of occupational classification scheme. In Husén, T. (Ed.), International Study of Achievement in Mathematics: A Comparison of Twelve Countries (Vol. I, pp. 139–146). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Averch, H. A., Carroll, S. J., Donaldson, T. S., Kiesling, H. J., & Pincus, J. (1974). How Effective Is Schooling? A Critical Review of Research. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.Google Scholar

Baker, E. L., Chung, G. K. W. K., & Cai, L. (2016). Assessment gaze, refraction, and blur: The course of achievement testing in the past 100 years. Review of Research in Education, 40(1), 94–142. doi: 10.3102/0091732X16679806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baker, D. P., Goesling, B., & LeTendre, G. K. (2002). Socioeconomic status, school quality, and national economic development: A cross‐national analysis of the “Heyneman‐Loxley Effect” on mathematics and science achievement. Comparative Education Review, 46, 291–312. doi:10.1086/341159.Google Scholar

Beaton, A. E., Martin, M. O., Mullis, I., Gonzalez, E. J., Smith, T. A., & Kelly, D. L. (1996a). Science Achievement in the Middle School Years: IEA’s Third International Mathematics and Science Study. Chestnut Hill, MA: Center for the Study of Testing, Evaluation, and Educational Policy, Boston College.Google Scholar

Beaton, A. E., Mullis, I., Martin, M. O., Gonzalez, E. J., Kelly, D. L., & Smith, T. A. (1996b). Mathematics Achievement in the Middle School Years: IEA’s Third International Mathematics and Science Study. Chestnut Hill, MA: Center for the Study of Testing, Evaluation, and Educational Policy, Boston College.Google Scholar

Berliner, D. C. (1990). What’s all the fuss about instructional time? In Ben-Perez, M. & Bromme, R. (Eds.), The Nature of Time in School (pp. 3–35). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar

Bidwell, C. E., & Kasarda, J. D. (1980, August). Conceptualising and measuring the effects of school and schooling. American Journal of Education, 88(4), 401–430.Google Scholar

Bloom, B. S. (1968). Learning for mastery. Instruction and curriculum. Regional Education Laboratory for the Carolinas and Virginia, Topical Papers and Reprints, Number 1. Evaluation Comment, 1(2). Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED053419Google Scholar

Bloom, B. S. (1974). Time and learning. American Psychologist, 29(9), 682–688.Google Scholar

Bloom, B. S. (1976). Human Characteristics and School Learning. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Bloom, B. S., Bjorkquist, L. M., Foshay, A. W., Groen, M., Harada, T., Husén, T., … Wiegersma, S. (1967). Social factors in education. In Husén, T. (Ed.), International Study of Achievement in Mathematics: A Comparison of Twelve Countries (Vol. II, pp. 199–259). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Borg, W. R. (1980). Time and school learning. In Denham, C. & Lieberman, A. (Eds.), Time to Learn: A Review of the Beginning Teacher Evaluation Study (pp. 33–72). Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.Google Scholar

Bowles, S., & Levin, H. M. (1968). The determinants of scholastic achievement – An appraisal of some recent evidence. The Journal of Human Resources, 3(1), 324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bradburn, N., Haertel, E., Schwille, J., & Torney-Purta, J. (1991). A rejoinder to “I Never Promised You First Place” on JSTOR. Phi Delta Kappan, 774–777. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/20404533?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contentsGoogle Scholar

Bradley, R. H., & Corwyn, R. F. (2002). Socioeconomic status and child development. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 371–399.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Broadfoot, P. (2010). Comparative education for the 21st century: Retrospect and prospect. Comparative Education, 36(3), 357–371. doi: 10.1080/03050060050129036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, J., Schiller, K., Roey, S., Perkins, R., Schmidt, W. H., & Houang, R. (2013). Algebra I and Geometry Curricula (NCES 2013–451). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar

Buchmann, C. (2002). Measuring family background in international studies of education: Conceptual issues and methodological challenges. In Porter, A. C. & Gamoran, A. (Eds.), Methodological Advances in Cross-National Surveys of Educational Achievement (pp. 150–197). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar

Burstein, L. (1991). [Project internal working document presented at TIMSS-95 country planning meeting]. Unpublished internal working document.Google Scholar

Burstein, L. (Ed.). (1993). The IEA Study of Mathematics III: Student Growth and Classroom Processes (Vol. 3). Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Carnoy, M., Khavenson, T., & Ivanova, A. (2015). Using TIMSS and PISA results to inform educational policy: A study of Russia and its neighbours. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 45(2), 248–271. doi:10.1080/03057925.2013.855002.Google Scholar

Carnoy, M., Khavenson, T., Loyalka, P., Schmidt, W. H., & Zakharov, A. (2016). Revisiting the relationship between international assessment outcomes and educational production: Evidence from a longitudinal PISA-TIMSS sample. American Educational Research Journal, 53(4), 1054–1085. doi: 10.3102/0002831216653180.Google Scholar

Carnoy, M., & Rothstein, R. (2013). What do international tests really show about US student performance. Economic Policy Institute, 28.Google Scholar

Carroll, J. B. (1963). A model of school learning. Teachers College Record, 64(8), 723–733.Google Scholar

Carroll, J. B. (1975). The Teaching of French as a Foreign Language in Eight Countries. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar

Carroll, J. (1984). The model of school learning: Progress of an idea. In Anderson, L. W. (Ed.), Time and School Learning: Theory, Research and Practice (pp. 15–45). London: Cambridge University Press Archive.Google Scholar

Carroll, J. B. (1989). The Carroll Model: A 25-year retrospective and prospective view. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 26–31. doi:10.3102/0013189X018001026.Google Scholar

Causa, O., & Chapuis, C. (2009). Equity in Student Achievement across OECD Countries: An Investigation of the Role of Policies. (OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 708). doi: 10.1787/223056645650.Google Scholar

Chapin, F. S. (1928). A quantitative scale for rating the home and social environment of middle class families in an urban community: A first approximation to the measurement of socio-economic status. Journal of Educational Psychology, 19(2), 99–111. doi:10.1037/h0074500.Google Scholar

Chudgar, A., & Luschei, T. F. (2009). National income, income inequality, and the importance of schools: A hierarchical cross-national comparison. American Educational Research Journal, 46(3), 626–658.Google Scholar

Clements, M. A. K., Bishop, A. J., Keitel, C., Kilpatrick, J., & Leung, F. K. S. (2013). From the few to the many: Historical perspectives on who should learn mathematics. In Clements, M. A. K., Bishop, A. J., Keitel, C., Kilpatrick, J., & Leung, F. K. S. (Eds.), Third International Handbook of Mathematics Education (pp. 7–40). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cogan, L. S., & Schmidt, W. H. (2015). The concept of opportunity to learn (OTL) in international comparisons of education. In Stacey, K. & Turner, R. (Eds.), Assessing Mathematical Literacy: The PISA Experience (pp. 207–216). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978–3–319–10121–7.Google Scholar

Cogan, L. S., Schmidt, W. H., & Houang, R. (2014). Primary teacher preparation in the United States: What we have learned. In Blömeke, S., Hsieh, F.-J., Kaiser, G., & Schmidt, W. H. (Eds.), International Perspectives on Teacher Knowledge, Beliefs, and Opportunities to Learn (pp. 355–369). Dordrecht/Heidelberg/New York/London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cogan, L. S., Schmidt, W. H., & Wiley, D. E. (2001). Who takes what math and in which track? Using TIMSS to characterize U.S. students’ eighth-grade mathematics learning opportunities. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23(4), 323–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coleman, J. S. (1975). Methods and results in the IEA studies of effects of school on learning. Review of Educational Research, 45(3), 335–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. J., McPartland, J., Mood, A. M., Weinfeld, F. D., & York, R. L. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity, (NCES No. OE-38001). Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED012275.pdf.Google Scholar

Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Common Core State Standards for Mathematics (p. 93): National Governors Association Center for Best Practices (NGA Center) and the Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO).Google Scholar

Cowen, R. (1996). Last past the post: Comparative education, modernity and perhaps post-modernity. Comparative Education, 32(2), 151–170. doi: 10.1080/03050069628812.Google Scholar

Darling-Hammond, L., & Snyder, J. (1992). Curriculum studies and the traditions of inquiry: the scientific tradition. In Jackson, P. W. (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Curriculum: A Project of the American Educational Research Association. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.Google Scholar

de Lange, J. (1996). Using and applying mathematics in education. In Bishop, A. J., Clements, K., Keitel, C., Kilpatrick, J., & Laborde, C. (Eds.), International Handbook of Mathematics Education (Part 1, pp. 49–97). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar

de Lange, J. (2003). Mathematics for literacy. In Madison, B. L. & Steen, L. A. (Eds.), Quantitative Literacy: Why Numeracy Matters for Schools and Colleges (pp. 75–89). Princeton, NJ: The National Council on Education and the Disciplines.Google Scholar

Dumay, X., & Dupriez, V. (2007). Accounting for class effect using the TIMSS 2003 eighth-grade database: Net effect of group composition, net effect of class process, and joint effect. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 18(4), 383–408. doi:10.1080/09243450601146371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elliott, J., & Kushner, S. (2007). The need for a manifesto for educational programme evaluation. Cambridge Journal of Education, 37(3), 321–336. doi: 10.1080/03057640701546649.Google Scholar

Entwisle, D. R., & Astone, N. M. (1994). Some practical guidelines for measuring youth’s race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status. Child Development, 65(6), 1521–1540. doi: 10.2307/1131278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Foshay, A. W. (1962). The background and the procedures of the twelve-country study: Educational achievements of thirteen-year-olds in twelve countries (pp. 7–19). Hamburg: UNESCO Institute for Education.Google Scholar

Foshay, A. W., Thorndike, R. L., Hotyat, F., Pidgeon, D. A., & Walker, D. A. (1962). Educational Achievements of Thirteen-Year-Olds in Twelve Countries. Hamburg. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001314/131437eo.pdf.Google Scholar

Floden, R. E. (2002). The Measurement of Opportunity to Learn. In Porter, A. C. & Gamoran, A. (Eds.), Methodological Advances in Cross-National Surveys of Educational Achievement (pp. 231–266). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar

Fuller, B., & Clarke, P. (1994). Raising school effects while ignoring culture? Local conditions and the influence of classroom tools, rules, and pedagogy. Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 119–157.Google Scholar

Gamoran, A. (1996). Effects of schooling on children and families. In Booth, A. and Dunn, J. F. (Eds.), Family-School Links: How Do They Affect Education Outcomes? (pp. 107–114) Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Gamoran, A., & Berends, M. (1987). The effects of stratification in secondary schools: Synthesis of survey and ethnographic research. Review of Educational Research, 57(4), 415–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gamoran, A., & Long, D. A. (2007). Equality of educational opportunity: A 40 year retrospective. In International Studies in Educational Inequality, Theory and Policy (pp. 23–47). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. doi: 10.1007/978–1–4020–5916–2_2.Google Scholar

Ganzeboom, H. B. G., De Graaf, P. M., & Treiman, D. J. (1992). A standard international socio-economic index of occupational status. Social Science Research, 21(1), 1–56. doi: 10.1016/0049-089X(92)90017-B.Google Scholar

Garden, R. A., & Livingstone, I. (1989). The contexts of mathematics education: Nations, communities and schools. In Robitaille, D. F. & Garden, R. A. (Eds.), The IEA Study of Mathematics II: Contexts and Outcomes of School Mathematics (pp. 17–38). Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Garden, R. A., & Orpwood, G. (1996). Development of the TIMSS achievement tests. In Martin, M. O. & Kelly, D. L. (Eds.), Third International Mathematics and Science Study Technical Report (Vol. Volume I: Design and Development, pp. 2–1–2–19). Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.Google Scholar

Goldin, G. (2008). Perspectives on representation in mathematical learning and problem solving. In English, L. D., Bartolini Bussi, M., Jones, G. A., Lesh, R. A., Sriraman, B., & Tirosh, D. (Eds.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 176–201). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Gonzales, P., Calsyn, C., Jocelyn, L., Mak, K., Kastberg, D., Arafeh, S., … Tsen, W. (2000). Pursuing Excellence: Comparisons of International Eighth-Grade Mathematics and Science Achievement from a U.S. Perspective, 1995 and 1999: Initial Findings from the Third International Mathematics and Science Study-Repeat. Washington, DC: DIANE Publishing.Google Scholar

Greenwald, R., Hedges, L. V, & Laine, R. D. (1996). The effect of school resources on student achievement. Review of Educational Research, 66(3), 361–396.Google Scholar

Grek, S. (2009). Governing by numbers: the PISA “effect” in Europe. Journal of Education Policy, 24(1), 23–37. doi: 10.1080/02680930802412669.Google Scholar

Gustafsson, J.-E. (2008). Effects of international comparative studies on educational quality on the quality of educational research. European Educational Research Journal, 7(1), 1. doi: 10.2304/eerj.2008.7.1.1.Google Scholar

Gustafsson, J.-E., & Rosen, M. (2014). Quality and credibility of international studies. In Strietholt, R., Bos, W., Gustafsson, J.-E., & Rosen, M. (Eds.), Educational Policy Evaluation through International Comparative Assessments (pp. 19–31). Münster: Waxmann Verlag.Google Scholar

Hans, N. (1949). Comparative Education: A Study of Educational Factors and Traditions. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Limited.Google Scholar

Hanushek, E. A., & Kain, J. F. (1972). On the value of equality of educational opportunity as a guide to public policy. In Mosteller, F. & Moynihan, D. P. (Eds.), On Equality of Educational Opportunity (pp. 116–145). New York, NY: Vintage Books.Google Scholar

Hanushek, E. A., & Woessmann, L. (2007). The role of education quality for economic growth (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4122). Retrieved from http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/260461468324885735/pdf/wps4122.pdf.Google Scholar

Harlen, W. (2001). The assessment of scientific literacy in the OECD/PISA project. Studies in Science Education, 36(1), 79–103. doi: 10.1080/03057260108560168.Google Scholar

Harmon, M., Smith, T. A., Martin, M. O., Kelly, D. L., Beaton, A. E., Mullis, I., … Orpwood, G. (1997). Performance Assessment in IEA’s Third International Mathematics and Science Study. Chestnut Hill, MA: Center for the Study of Testing, Evaluation, and Educational Policy, Boston College.Google Scholar

Hauser, R. M. (1994). Measuring socioeconomic status in studies of child development. Child Development, 65(6), 1541–1545.Google Scholar

Hauser, R. M., & Featherman, D. L. (1976). Equality of schooling: Trends and prospects. Sociology of Education, 29(2), 99–120.Google Scholar

Heyneman, S. P., & Loxley, W. A. (1983). The effect of primary-school quality on academic achievement across twenty-nine high- and low-income countries. American Journal of Sociology, 88(6), 1162–1194.Google Scholar

Hiebert, J., & Stigler, J. W. (2000). A proposal for improving classroom teaching: Lessons from the TIMSS Video Study. The Elementary School Journal, 101(1), 3–20.Google Scholar

Holliday, W. G., & Holliday, B. W. (2003). Why using international comparative math and science achievement data from TIMSS is not helpful. The Educational Forum, 67(3), 250–257. doi: 10.1080/00131720309335038.Google Scholar

Houang, R. T., & Schmidt, W. H. (2008). TIMSS international curriculum analysis and measuring educational opportunities. In 3rd IEA International Research Conference, Taipei, Chinese Taipei (p. 18). Taipei, Chinese Taipei.Google Scholar

Howie, S. J., & Plomp, T. (2006). Lessons from cross-national research on context and achievement: Hunting and fishing in the TIMSS landscape. In Howie, S. J. & Plomp, T. (Eds.), Contexts of Learning Mathematics and Science: Lessons Learned from TIMSS (pp. 3–16). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Husén, T. (Ed.). (1967a). International Study of Achievement in Mathematics: A Comparison of Twelve Countries (Vol. I). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar

Husén, T. (Ed.). (1967b). International Study of Achievement in Mathematics: A Comparison of Twelve Countries (Vol. II). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar

Husén, T. (1974). Multi‐national evaluation of school systems: Purposes, methodology, and some preliminary findings. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 18(1), 13–39.Google Scholar

Husén, T. (1979). An international research venture in retrospect: The IEA surveys. Comparative Education Review, 23(3), 371–385. doi: 10.1086/446067.Google Scholar

Husén, T. (1983). Are standards in U.S. schools really lagging behind those in other countries? The Phi Delta Kappan, 64(7), 455–461.Google Scholar

Husén, T., & Postlethwaite, N. (1996). A brief history of the International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA). Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 3(2), 129–141. doi: 10.1080/0969594960030202.Google Scholar

IEA. Home. (n.d.). Retrieved from www.iea.nl/.Google Scholar

International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA). (1988). Science Achievement in Seventeen Countries: A Preliminary Report. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar

Institute of Education Sciences. (n.d.). The middle grades longitudinal study of 2017–18 (MGLS: 2017). Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/surveys/mgls/.Google Scholar

Jakwerth, P. M. (1996). Evaluating content validity in cross-national achievement tests. (Ph.D. Dissertation), Michigan State University, East Lansing.Google Scholar

James, W. (1899). Talks to Teachers on Psychology: And to Students on Some of Life’s Ideals. New York, NY: H. Holt and company.Google Scholar

Jencks, C., Smith, M., Acland, H., Bane, M. S., Cohen, D., Gintis, H., Heyns, B., & Michelson, S. (1972). Inequality: A Reassessment of the Effect of Family and Schooling in America. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Keeves, J. P. (1974). The IEA science project: Science achievement in three countries – Australia, the Federal Republic of Germany and the United States. In Bruderlin, M. (Ed.), Implementation of Curricula in Science Education (pp. 158–178). Cologne: German Commission for UNESCO.Google Scholar

Keeves, J. P. (1992). Learning Science in a Changing World. Cross-National Studies of Science Achievement: 1970 to 1984. Hague, The Netherlands: IEA International Headquarters.Google Scholar

Keeves, J. P. (2011). IEA - from the beginning in 1958 to 1990. In Papanastasiou, C., Plomp, T., & Papanastasiou, E. C. (Eds.), IEA 1958–2008: 50 Years of Experiences and Memories (Vol. 1). Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.Google Scholar

Keeves, J. P., & Lietz, P. (2011). The relationship of IEA to some developments in educational research methodology and measurement during the years from 1962 to 1992. Papanastasiou, C., Plomp, T., & Papanastasiou, E. C. (Eds.), IEA 1958–2008: 50 Years of Experiences and Memories (Vol. 1, pp. 217–251). Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.Google Scholar

Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Masia, B. B. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. New York, NY: David McKay.Google Scholar

Lucas, S. R. (1999). Tracking Inequality: Stratification and Mobility in American High Schools (Sociology of Education Series). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar

Lundgren, U. P. (2011). PISA as a political instrument. In Pereyra, M. A., Kotthoff, H.-G., & Cowen, R. (Eds.), PISA under Examination: Changing Knowledge, Changing Tests, and Changing Schools (pp. 17–30). Rotterdam, NY: SensePublishers.Google Scholar

Martin, M. O., & Kelly, D. L. (Eds.). (1996). Third International Mathematics and Science Study: Technical report (volume 1): Design and development. Chestnut Hills, MA: Center for the Study of Testing, Evaluation, and Educational Policy, Boston College.Google Scholar

Martin, M. O., & Mullis, I. V. S. (2006). TIMSS: Purpose and design. In Howie, S. J. & Plomp, T. (Eds.), Contexts of Learning Mathematics and Science: Lessons Learned from TIMSS (pp. 17–30). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Martin, M. O., Mullis, I., Beaton, A. E., Gonzalez, E. J., Kelly, D. L., & Smith, T. A. (1997). Science Achievement in the Primary School Years: IEA’s Third International Mathematics and Science Study. Chestnut Hill, MA: Center for the Study of Testing, Evaluation, and Educational Policy, Boston College.Google Scholar

McDonnell, L. M. (1995). Opportunity to learn as a research concept and a policy instrument. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 17(3), 305–322. doi: 10.3102/01623737017003305.Google Scholar

Medrich, E. A., & Griffith, J. E. (1992). International Mathematics and Science Assessment: What Have We Learned? (NCES 92–011). Washington, DC: US Department of Education. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs92/92011.pdf.Google Scholar

Michalowicz, K. D., & Howard, A. C. (2003). Pedagogy in text: An analysis of mathematics texts from the nineteenth century. In Stanic, G. M. A. & Kilpatrick, J. (Eds.), A History of School Mathematics (Vol. 1, pp. 77–109). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar

Mislevy, R. J. (1991). Randomization-based inference about latent variables from complex samples. Psychometrika, 56(2), 177–196.Google Scholar

Mitter, W. (1997). Challenges to comparative education: Between retrospect and expectation. International Review of Education, 43(5–6), 401–412. doi: 10.1023/A:1003084402042.Google Scholar

Montt, G. (2011). Cross-national differences in educational achievement inequality. Sociology of Education, 84(1), 49–68.Google Scholar

Morgan, C., & Shahjahan, R. A. (2014). The legitimation of OECD’s global educational governance: Examining PISA and AHELO test production. Comparative Education, 50(2), 192–205.Google Scholar

Mullis, I., Martin, M. O., Beaton, A. E., Gonzalez, E. J., Kelly, D. L., & Smith, T. A. (1997). Mathematics Achievement in the Primary School Years: IEA’s Third International Mathematics and Science Study. Chestnut Hill, MA: Center for the Study of Testing, Evaluation, and Educational Policy, Boston College.Google Scholar

Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., & Foy, P. (2008). TIMSS 2007 International Mathematics Report: Findings from IEA’s Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study at the Fourth and Eighth Grades. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College.Google Scholar

Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Hooper, M. (2016). TIMSS 2015 International Results in Mathematics. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College.Google Scholar

Mundy, K., & Ghali, M. (2009). International and transnational policy actors in education: A review of the research. In Sykes, G., Schneider, B., & Plank, D. (Eds.), Handbook of Education Policy Research (pp. 717–734). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

National Center for Education Statistics. (2012). Improving the Measurement of Socioeconomic Status for the National Assessment of Educational Progress: A Theoretical Foundation. Retrieved from Washington, DC: http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pdf/researchcenter/Socioeconomic_Factors.pdf.Google Scholar

National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers (2010). Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. Retrieved from www.corestandards.org/Math/.Google Scholar

National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for Success: The Final Report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.Google Scholar

National Research Council. (2012). Education for Life and Work: Developing Transferable Knowledge and Skills in the 21st Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/13398.Google Scholar

Noah, H. J., & Eckstein, M. A. (1969). Toward a Science of Comparative Education. New York, NY: The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar

Nonoyama-Tarumi, Y., & Willms, J. D. (2010). The relative and absolute risks of disadvantaged family background and low levels of school resources on student literacy. Economics of Education Review, 29(2), 214–224. doi: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2009.07.007.Google Scholar

Oakes, J. (1985). Keeping Track: How Schools Structure Inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

OECD. (2000). Measuring Student Knowledge and Skills: The PISA 2000 Assessment of Reading, Mathematical and Scientific Literacy. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar

OECD. (2004). The PISA 2003 Assessment Framework: Mathematics, Reading, Science and Problem Solving Knowledge and Skills. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar

OECD. (2013a). PISA 2012 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Mathematics, Reading, Science, Problem Solving and Financial Literacy. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/9789264190511-en.Google Scholar

OECD. (2013b). PISA 2012 Results: Excellence through Equity: Giving Every Student the Chance to Succeed (Volume II). Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar

OECD. (2014a). PISA 2012 Results: What Students Know and Can Do (Volume I, Revised Edition, February 2014): Student Performance in Mathematics, Reading and Science. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar

OECD. (2014b). PISA 2012 technical report. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/PISA-2012-technical-report-final.pdf.Google Scholar

OECD. (2015). PISA 2015 Draft Science Framework. OECD Publishing. Retrieved from www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/Draft%20PISA%202015%20Science%20Framework%20.pdf.Google Scholar

OECD. (n.d.). About PISA, retrieved September 30, 2015, from www.oecd.org/pisa/aboutpisa/Google Scholar

Pant, H. A., Tiffin-Richards, S. P., & Stanat, P. (2017). Standards setting: Bridging the worlds of policy making and research. In Blӧmeke, S. & Gustafsson, J. –E. (Eds.), Standard Setting in Education. Methodology of Educational Measurement and Assessment (pp. 49–68). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar

Pereyra, M. A., Kotthoff, H. -G., & Cowen, R. (2011). PISA under examination. In Pereyra, M. A., Kotthoff, H.-G., & Cowen, R. (Eds.), PISA under Examination: Changing Knowledge, Changing Tests, and Changing Schools (pp. 1–14). Rotterdam: SensePublishers. doi: 10.1007/978–94–6091–740–0.Google Scholar

PISA 2021 Mathematics Advisory Committee. (2017). Mathematical Literacy: A Broadened Perspective. (Working Paper Submitted to PISA Governing Board). Paris: OECD.Google Scholar

Plowden, B. (Ed.). (1967a). Children and their Primary Schools: A Report of the Control Advisory Council for Education (England) (Volume I: The Report). London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.Google Scholar

Plowden, B. (Ed.). (1967b). Children and their Primary Schools: A Report of the Control Advisory Council for Education (England) (Volume II: Research and Surveys). London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. Retrieved from www.educationengland.org.uk/documents/plowden/plowden1967-2.html.Google Scholar

Postlethwaite, T. N. (1967). School Organization and Student Achievement: A Study Based on Achievement in Mathematics in Twelve Countries. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar

Postlethwaite, T. N., & Wiley, D. E. (Eds.). (1992). The IEA Study of Science I: Science Achievement in Twenty-Three Countries. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Purves, A. C. (1987). The Evolution of the IEA: A Memoir. Comparative Education Review, 31(1), 10–28.Google Scholar

Reimers, F. M., & Chung, C. K. (2016). Teaching and Learning for the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar

Riddell, A. R. (1989). An alternative approach to the study of school effectiveness in third world countries. Comparative Education Review, 33(4), 481–497.Google Scholar

Robitaille, D. F. (1989). Students’ achievements: Population A. In Robitaille, D. F. & Garden, R. A. (Eds.), The IEA Study of Mathematics II: Contexts and Outcomes of School Mathematics (pp. 102–125). Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Robitaille, D. F., & Garden, R. A. (Eds.). (1989). The IEA Study of Mathematics II: Contexts and Outcomes of School Mathematics (Vol. 2). Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Robitaille, D. F., Schmidt, W. H., Raizen, S. A., McKnight, C. C., Britton, E., & Nicol, C. (1993). Curriculum Frameworks for Mathematics and Science. TIMSS Monograph No. 1. Vancouver: Pacific Educational Press, Faculty of Education, University of British Columbia.Google Scholar

Romberg, T. A., & Zarinnia, A. (1987). Consequences of the new world view to assessment of students’ knowledge of mathematics. In Romberg, T. A. & Stewart, D. M (Eds.), The Monitoring of School Mathematics: Background Papers (Vol. 2, pp. 153–201). Madison, WI: Wisconsin Center for Education Research, School of Education, University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar

Rosier, M. J., & Keeves, J. P. (Eds.). (1991). The IEA Study of Science I: Science Education and Curricula in Twenty-Three Countries. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Samoff, J. (2012). Institutionalizing international influence. In Arnove, R. F. & Torres, C. A. (Eds.), Comparative Education: The Dialectic of the Global and the Local (pp. 55–85). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar

Schiller, K. S., Schmidt, W. H., Muller, C., & Houang, R. T. (2010). Hidden disparities: How courses and curricula shape opportunities in mathematics during high school. Equity & Excellence in Education, 43(4), 414–433. doi: 10.1080/10665684.2010.517062.Google Scholar

Schmidt, W. H. (2009). Exploring the Relationship between Content Coverage and Achievement: Unpacking the Meaning of Tracking in Eighth-Grade Mathematics. Education Policy Center, East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.Google Scholar

Schmidt, W. H. (2017, Winter). Excellence and equality in mathematics education. American Affairs, 1(4): 32–33.Google Scholar

Schmidt, W. H., & Burroughs, N. A. (2016). The trade-off between excellence and equality: What international assessments tell us. Georgetown Journal of International Affairs, 17(1), 103–109. doi: 10.1353/gia.2016.0011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schmidt, W. H., Burroughs, N. A., Cogan, L. S., & Houang, R. T. (2017). The role of subject-matter content in teacher preparation: an international perspective for mathematics. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 49(2), 111–131. doi: 10.1080/00220272.2016.1153153.Google Scholar

Schmidt, W. H., Burroughs, N. A., Zoido, P., & Houang, R. T. (2015). The role of schooling in perpetuating educational inequality: An international perspective. Educational Researcher, 44(7), 371–386. doi:10.3102/0013189X15603982.Google Scholar

Schmidt, W. H., & Cogan, L. S. (1996). Development of the TIMSS context questionnaires. In Martin, M. O. & Kelly, D. L. (Eds.), Third International Mathematics and Science Study: Technical Report (Vol. Volume I: Design and Development, pp. 5–1–5–22). Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.Google Scholar

Schmidt, W. H., & Cogan, L. S. (2009). The myth of equal content. Educational Leadership, 67(3), 44–47.Google Scholar

Schmidt, W. H., & Cogan, L. S. (2014). Greater expectations in lower secondary mathematics teacher preparation: An examination of future teachers’ opportunity to learn profiles. In Blömeke, S., Hsieh, F.-J., Kaiser, G., & Schmidt, W. H. (Eds.), International Perspectives on Teacher Knowledge, Beliefs, and Opportunities to Learn (pp. 393–414). Dordrecht/ Heidelberg/New York/London: Springer.Google Scholar

Schmidt, W. H., Cogan, L. S., & Guo, S. (in press). The role that mathematics plays in college- and career-readiness: Evidence from PISA. Journal of Curriculum Studies.Google Scholar

Schmidt, W. H., Cogan, L., & Houang, R. (2011). The role of opportunity to learn in teacher preparation: An international context. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(2), 138–153.Google Scholar

Schmidt, W. H., Cogan, L. S., & Houang, R. (2014). Emphasis and balance among the components of teacher preparation: The case of lower-secondary mathematics teacher education. In Blömeke, S., Hsieh, F.-J., Kaiser, G., & Schmidt, W. H. (Eds.), International Perspectives on Teacher Knowledge, Beliefs, and Opportunities to Learn (pp. 371–392). Dordrecht/Heidelberg/New York/London: Springer.Google Scholar

Schmidt, W. H., Cogan, L. S., Houang, R. T., & McKnight, C. C. (2011). Content coverage differences across districts/states: A persisting challenge for U.S. education policy. American Journal of Education, 117(3), 399–427.Google Scholar

Schmidt, W. H., Cogan, L. S., & McKnight, C. C. (2010). Equality of educational opportunity: myth or reality in U.S. schooling? American Educator, 34(4), 12–19.Google Scholar

Schneider, B., Carnoy, M., Kilpatrick, J., Schmidt, W. H., & Shavelson, R. J. (2007). Estimating Causal Effects Using Experimental and Observational Designs (report from the Governing Board of the American Educational Research Association Grants Program). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar

Schmidt, W. H., & Houang, R. T. (2007). Lack of focus in the mathematics curriculum: Symptom or cause? In Loveless, T. (Ed.), Lessons Learned: What International Assessments Tell Us about Math Achievement (pp. 65 –84). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar

Schmidt, W. H., & Houang, R. T. (2012). Curricular coherence and the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. Education Researcher, 41(8), 294–308.Google Scholar

Schmidt, W., Houang, R., & Cogan, L. (2002). A coherent curriculum: The case of mathematics. American Educator, 26(2), 1–17.Google Scholar

Schmidt, W. H., Houang, R., & Cogan, L. S. (2011). Preparing future math teachers. Science, 332(603), 1266–1267.Google Scholar

Schmidt, W. H., Houang, R., & Shakrani, S. (2009). International Lessons about National Standards. Washington, DC: The Thomas B. Fordham Institute.Google Scholar

Schmidt, W. H., Jakwerth, P. M., & McKnight, C. C. (1998). Curriculum-sensitive assessment: Content does make a difference. International Journal of Educational Research, 29(6), 503–527.Google Scholar

Schmidt, W. H., Jorde, D., Cogan, L. S., Barrier, E., Gonzalo, I., Moser, U., … Wolfe, R. G. (1996). Characterizing Pedagogical Flow: An Investigation of Mathematics and Science Teaching in Six Countries. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Schmidt, W. H., & McKnight, C. C. (1995). Surveying educational opportunity in Mathematics and Science: An International Perspective. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 17(3), 337–353. Retrieved from http://epa.sagepub.com/content/17/3/337.full.pdf.Google Scholar

Schmidt, W. H., & McKnight, C. C. (2012). Inequality For All: The Challenge of Unequal Opportunity in American Schools. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar

Schmidt, W. H., McKnight, C., Cogan, L. S., Jakwerth, P. M., & Houang, R. T. (1999). Facing the Consequences: Using TIMSS for a Closer Look at U.S. Mathematics and Science Education. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Schmidt, W. H., McKnight, C. C., Houang, R. T., Wang, H. A., Wiley, D. E., Cogan, L. S., & Wolfe, R. G. (2001). Why Schools Matter: A Cross-National Comparison of Curriculum and Learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Schmidt, W. H., McKnight, C. C., & Raizen, S. A. (1997). A splintered Vision: An Investigation of U.S. Science and Mathematics Education. Dordrecht; Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

Schmidt, W. H., McKnight, C. C., Valverde, G. A., Houang, R. T., & Wiley, D. E. (1997). Many Visions, Many Aims (Volume I): A Cross-National Investigation of Curricular Intentions in School Mathematics. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

Schmidt, W. H., Raizen, S. A., Britton, E. D., Bianchi, L. J., & Wolfe, R. G. (1997). Many Visions, Many Aims, (Volume II): A Cross-National Investigation of Curricular Intentions in School Science. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Schmidt, W. H., Wang, H. A., & McKnight, C. C. (2005). Curriculum coherence: An examination of US mathematics and science content standards from an international perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(5), 525–529.Google Scholar

Schmidt, W. H., Zoido, P., & Cogan, L. S. (2014). Schooling Matters: Opportunity to Learn in PISA 2012 (OECD Education Working Papers, No. 95). Retrieved from doi: 10.1787/5k3v0hldmchl-en.Google Scholar

Schwille, J. (2011). Experiencing innovation and capacity building in IEA research, 1963–2008. In Papanastasiou, C., Plomp, T., & Papanastasiou, E. C. (Eds.), IEA 1958–2008: 50 Years of Experiences and Memories (Vol. II, pp. 627–707). Nicosia: Cultural Center of the Kykkos Monastery.Google Scholar

SciMath^MN. (2008). Minnesota TIMSS Report: December 2008 a Preliminary Summary of Results. St. Paul, MN: SciMath^MN.Google Scholar

Sellar, S., & Lingard, B. (2014). The OECD and the expansion of PISA: new global modes of governance in education. British Educational Research Journal, 40(6), 917–936. doi: 10.1002/berj.3120.Google Scholar

Sirin, S. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 417–453. doi:10.3102/00346543075003417.Google Scholar

Stevenson, H. W. (1998). A study of three cultures: Germany, Japan, and the United States – An overview of the TIMSS case study project. Phi Delta Kappan, 79(7), 524–529.Google Scholar

Stevenson, H. W., & Nerison-Low, R. (1997). To Sum It Up: Case Studies of Education in Germany, Japan, and the United States. Washington, DC: National Institute on Student Achievement, Curriculum, and Assessment, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar

Stigler, J., & Hiebert, J. (1997). Understanding and improving classroom mathematics instruction: An overview of the TIMSS video study. In Raising Australian Standards in Mathematics and Science: Insights from TIMSS Conference Proceedings (pp. 52–65). Camberwell, Victoria: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar

Stigler, J. W., Gonzales, P., Kawanaka, T., Knoll, S., & Serrano, A. (1999). The TIMSS Videotape Classroom Study: Methods and Findings from an Exploratory Research Project on Eighth-Grade Mathematics Instruction in Germany, Japan, and the United States. Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Survey of Mathematics and Science Opportunities. (1993). A description of the TIMSS’ achievement test content design: Test blueprints. In Survey of Mathematics and Science Opportunities Research Report Series. East Lansing: Michigan State University.Google Scholar

Tatto, M. T., Peck, R., Schwille, J., Bankov, K., Senk, S. L., Rodriguez, M., … Rowley, G. (2012). Policy, Practice, and Readiness to Teach Primary and Secondary Mathematics in 17 Countries: Findings from the IEA Teacher Education and Development Study in Mathematics (TEDS-M). Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA).Google Scholar

Thorndike, R. L. (1962). International comparison of the achievement of 13-year-olds. In Foshay, A. W., Thorndike, R. L., Hotyat, F., Pidgeon, D. A., & Walker, D. A. (Eds.), Educational Achievements of Thirteen-Year Olds in Twelve Countries: Results of an International Research Project, 1959–61 (pp. 21–42). Hamburg: UNESCO Institute for Education.Google Scholar

Thorndike, R. L. (1967a). Mathematics test and attitude inventory scores. In Husén, T. (Ed.), International Study of Achievement in Mathematics: A Comparison of Twelve Countries (Vol. II, pp. 21–48). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Thorndike, R. L. (1967b). The schools, the teachers, and the pupils. In Husén, T. (Ed.), International Study of Achievement in Mathematics: A Comparison of Twelve Countries (Vol. I, pp. 257–283). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Torney-Purta, J., & Schwille, J. (1986). Civic values learned in school: Policy and practice in industrialized nations. Comparative Education Review, 30(1), 30–49.Google Scholar

Travers, K. J. (2011). The Second International Mathematics Study (SIMS): Intention, implementation, attainment. In Papanastasiou, C., Plomp, T., & Papanastasiou, E. C. (Eds.), IEA 1958–2008: 50 Years of Experiences and Memories (Vol. 1, pp. 73–96). Amsterdam: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.Google Scholar

Travers, K. J., Oldham, E. E., & Livingstone, I. D. (1989). Origins of the Second International Mathematics Study. In Travers, K. J. & Westbury, I. (Eds.), The IEA Study of Mathematics I: Analysis of Mathematics Curricula (pp. 1–14). Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Travers, K. J., & Westbury, I. (Eds.). (1989). The IEA Study of Mathematics I: Analysis of Mathematics Curricula (Vol. 1). Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

UNESCO. (1997). International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED-1997). Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar

UNESCO. (2012). International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED-2011). Montreal, Quebec: UNESCO Institute for Statistics.Google Scholar

US Department of Education. (1996). National Center for Education Statistics, Pursuing Excellence: A Study of U.S. Twelfth-Grade Mathematics and Science Achievement in International Context (NCES 97–198). Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar

Valverde, G. A., Bianchi, L. J., Wolfe, R. G., Schmidt, W. H., & Houang, R. T. (2002). According to the Book: Using TIMSS to Investigate the Transition from Policy to Pedagogy in the World of Textbooks. Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

Valverde, G. A., & Schmidt, W. H. (2000). Greater expectations: learning from other nations in the quest for 'world-class standards' in US school mathematics and science. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32(5), 651-687.Google Scholar

Wagemaker, H., & Knight, G. (1986). The students of mathematics. In Robitaille, D. F. & Garden, R. A. (Eds.), The IEA Study of Mathematics II: Contexts and Outcomes of School Mathematics (pp. 63–83). Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Walker, D. A. (1976). The IEA Six Subject Survey: An Empirical Study of Education in Twenty-One Countries. New York, NY: Halsted Press.Google Scholar

Walker, D. A. (1962). An analysis of the reactions of Scottish teachers and pupils to items in the geography, mathematics and science tests. In Foshay, A. W., Thorndike, R. L., Hotyat, F., Pidgeon, D. A., & Walker, D. A. (Eds.), Educational Achievements of Thirteen-Year-Olds in twelve Countries (pp. 63–68). Hamburg: UNESCO Institute for Education.Google Scholar

White, K. R. (1982). The relation between socioeconomic status and academic achievement. American Psychological Association, 91(3), 461–481.Google Scholar

Wiley, D. E., & Wolfe, R. G. (1992). Major survey design issues for the IEA Third International Mathematics and Science Study. Prospects, 22(3), 297–304. doi: 10.1007/BF02195952.Google Scholar

Woessmann, L. (2004). How equal are educational opportunities? Family background and student achievement in Europe and the US (CESifo Working Paper Series No. 1162).Google Scholar