Book contents
- Roman Political Thought
- Key Themes in Ancient History
- Roman Political Thought
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- Timeline
- Texts, Translations, and Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 The Roman Constitution in Theory and Practice
- Chapter 2 Liberty and Related Concepts
- Chapter 3 Citizenship and Civic Virtue
- Chapter 4 Political Passions and Civic Corruption
- Chapter 5 Rhetoric, Deliberation, and Judgment
- Chapter 6 Civil Religion
- Chapter 7 Imperialism, Just War Theory, and Cosmopolitanism
- Conclusion
- Bibliographical Essay
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 March 2018
Book contents
- Roman Political Thought
- Key Themes in Ancient History
- Roman Political Thought
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Preface
- Timeline
- Texts, Translations, and Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 The Roman Constitution in Theory and Practice
- Chapter 2 Liberty and Related Concepts
- Chapter 3 Citizenship and Civic Virtue
- Chapter 4 Political Passions and Civic Corruption
- Chapter 5 Rhetoric, Deliberation, and Judgment
- Chapter 6 Civil Religion
- Chapter 7 Imperialism, Just War Theory, and Cosmopolitanism
- Conclusion
- Bibliographical Essay
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Roman Political Thought , pp. 205 - 225Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Alexander, M. (2006) “Law in the Roman Republic,” in Rosenstein and Morstein- Marx (2006), 236–55.Google Scholar
Algra, K. A., Barnes, J., Mansfeld, J., and Schofield, M. (eds.) (1999) The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Allen, D. (2014) Our Declaration: A Reading of the Declaration of Independence in Defense of Equality. New York and London.Google Scholar
Ando, C. (2010) “‘A dwelling beyond violence’: on the uses and disadvantages of history for contemporary republicans,” HPT 31 (2): 183–220.Google Scholar
Ando, C. (2011) Law, Language, and Empire in the Roman Tradition: Empire and After. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Annas, J. (2013) “Plato’s Laws and Cicero’s De legibus,” in Schofield, M. (ed.), Aristotle, Plato and Pythagoreanism in the First Century BC: New Directions for Philosophy, 206–24. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Arena, V. (2011) “Roman sumptuary legislation: three concepts of liberty,” European Journal of Political Theory 10 (4): 463–89.Google Scholar
Arena, V. (2012) Libertas and the Practice of Politics in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Arena, V. (2015) “Informal norms, values, and social control in the Roman participatory context,” in Hammer (2015), 217–38.Google Scholar
Arena, V. (2016) “Popular sovereignty in the late Roman Republic: Cicero and the will of the people,” in Bourke, R. and Skinner, Q. (eds.), Popular Sovereignty in Historical Perspective, 73–95. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Arena, V., and Prag, J. (eds.) (forthcoming) A Companion to Roman Political Culture. Malden, MA.Google Scholar
Arendt, H. (1968) Between Past and Future: Eight Exercises in Political Thought, revised edn. New York.Google Scholar
Art, R. J., and Waltz, K. N. (1983) “Technology, strategy, and the uses of force,” in Art, R. J. and Waltz, K. N. (eds.), The Use of Force, 1–32. Lanham, MD.Google Scholar
Asmis, E. (2004) “The state as a partnership: Cicero’s definition of res publica in his work On the State,” HPT 25 (4): 569–99.Google Scholar
Asmis, E. (2005) “A new kind of model: Cicero’s Roman constitution in De Republica,” AJPh 126 (3): 377–416.Google Scholar
Asmis, E. (2008a) “Cicero on natural law and the laws of the state,” ClAnt 27 (1): 1–33.Google Scholar
Asmis, E. (2008b) “Lucretius’ new world order: making a pact with nature,” CQ 58 (1): 141–57.Google Scholar
Atkins, E. M. (1990) “‘Domina et regina virtutum’: justice and societas in De officiis,” Phronesis 35 (1): 258–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkins, J. W. (2011) “The Officia of St. Ambrose’s De officiis,” Journal of Early Christian Studies 19 (1): 49–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkins, J. W. (2012) “Greek and Roman political philosophy,” in Clayman, D. (ed.), Oxford Bibliographies in “Classics.” Oxford [online; updated 2015].Google Scholar
Atkins, J. W. (2013) Cicero on Politics and the Limits of Reason: The Republic and Laws. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Atkins, J. W. (2014) “A revolutionary doctrine? Cicero’s natural right teaching in Mably and Burke,” Classical Receptions Journal 6 (2): 177–97.Google Scholar
Atkins, J. W. (2015) “Zeno’s Republic, Plato’s Laws, and the early development of Stoic natural law theory,” Polis 32 (1): 166–90.Google Scholar
Atkins, J. W. (2016) “Classic Communication,” Duke Magazine, Special Issue 2016, 14–15, http://dukemagazine.duke.edu/article/classic-communication.Google Scholar
Atkins, J. W. (2017) “Natural law and civil religion: De legibus book II,” in Höffe, O. (ed.), Ciceros Staatsphilosophie: Ein Kooperativer Kommentar zu De re publica und De legibus, 167–86. Klassiker Auslegen 64. Berlin.Google Scholar
Atkins, J. W. (forthcoming a) “Constitution and empire in Roman republican thought,” in Museum and Ancient Roman Civilization. Beijing. [English title of Chinese text.]Google Scholar
Atkins, J. W. (forthcoming b) “Cosmopolitanism, just wars, and empire,” in Atkins, J. W and Bénatouïl, T. (eds.), Cambridge Companion to Cicero’s Philosophy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Atkins, J. W. (forthcoming c) “Leo Strauss’s Lucretius and the art of writing,” in Burian, P., Davis, G., and Strauss Clay, J. (eds.), Beiträge zur Altertumswissenschaft, Special issue edition. Berlin.Google Scholar
Atkins, J. W. (forthcoming d) “Non-domination and the libera res publica in Cicero’s republicanism,” in Arena, V. (ed.), Liberty: An Ancient Concept for the Contemporary World, History of European Ideas, Special issue edition.Google Scholar
Atkins, J. W. (forthcoming e) “Politics, politeia, and rational control,” in Cambiano, G. and Lianeri, A. (eds.), The Edinburgh Critical History of Greek and Roman Philosophy. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Ball, T., Farr, J., and Hanson, R. (eds.) (1989) Political Innovation and Conceptual Change. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Balot, R. (2010) “Polybius’ advice to the Imperial Republic,” Political Theory 38 (4): 483–509.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (2015) “Cicero and the just war,” in J. Barnes, Mantissa: Essays in Ancient Philosophy IV, M. Bonelli (ed.), 56–79. Oxford.Google Scholar
Barnes, T. D. (1985) Tertullian: A Historical and Literary Study, reissued with corrections and a postscript. Oxford.Google Scholar
Bartsch, S. (1994) Actors in the Audience: Theatricality and Doublespeak from Nero to Hadrian. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Batstone, W. W. (2010) (ed. and trans.) Sallust: Catiline’s Conspiracy; The Jugurthine War; Histories. Oxford.Google Scholar
Beard, M. (1986) “Cicero and divinization: the formation of a Latin discourse,” JRS 76: 33–46.Google Scholar
Beck, H. (2011) “Consular power and the Roman constitution: the case of imperium reconsidered,” in Beck, H. et al. (eds.), Consuls and the Res Publica: Holding High Office in the Roman Republic, 77–96. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bederman, D. (2008) The Classical Foundations of the American Constitution: Prevailing Wisdom. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beiner, R. (2011) Civil Religion: A Dialogue in the History of Political Philosophy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Bélanger, R. (1985) “Le plaidoyer de Tertullien pour la liberté religieuse,” Studies in Religion 14 (3): 281–91.Google Scholar
Bell, P. (ed. and trans.) (2009) Three Political Voices from the Age of Justinian: Agapetus, “Advice to the Emperor”; Dialogue on Political Science; Paul the Silentiary, “Description of Hagia Sophia.” Liverpool.Google Scholar
Bellah, R. (1968) “Response,” in Cutler, D. R (ed.), The Religious Situation: 1968, 388–93. Boston.Google Scholar
Bellah, R. (1970 [1967]) “Civil religion in America,” in Beyond Belief: Essays on Religion in a Post-Traditional World, 168–89. New York.Google Scholar
Boesche, R. (1987) “The politics of pretence: Tacitus and the political theory of despotism,” HPT 8 (2): 189–210.Google Scholar
Bohman, J., and Rehg, W. (eds.) (1997) Deliberative Democracy: Essays on Reason and Politics. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Bosworth, A. B. (2004) “‘Mountain and molehill?’ Cornelius Tacitus and Quintus Curtius,” CQ 54 (2): 551–67.Google Scholar
Bowen, A., and Garnsey, P. (eds. and trans.) (2003) Lactantius: Divine Institutes. Liverpool.Google Scholar
Bradley, K. (2011) “Slavery in the Roman Republic,” in Bradley, K. and Cartledge, P. (eds.), The Cambridge World History of Slavery, Volume 1: The Ancient Mediterranean World, 241–64. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Braund, S. (ed. and trans.) (2009) Seneca, De Clementia: Edited with Text, Translation and Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar
Brennan, T. C. (2004) “Power and process under the Republican ‘constitution’,” in Flower, H. I. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Roman Republic, 31–65. Cambridge. [Second edn. published in 2014.]Google Scholar
Brink, C. O., and Walbank, F. W. (1954) “The construction of the sixth book of Polybius,” CQ 4 (3–4): 97–122.Google Scholar
Brooks, D. (2015) “The structure of gratitude,” New York Times, July 28, 2015, www.nytimes.com/2015/07/28/opinion/david-brooks-the-structure-of-gratitude.html.Google Scholar
Bruno, M. J. S. (2014) Political Augustinianism: Modern Interpretations of Augustine’s Political Thought. Minneapolis, MN.Google Scholar
Buckland, W. W. (1908) The Roman Law of Slavery: The Condition of the Slave in Private Law from Augustus to Justinian. Cambridge. [Reprinted 1970.]Google Scholar
Buckland, W. W. (1963) A Textbook of Roman Law from Augustus to Justinian, third edn., revised by Stein, P. G. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Burton, P. J. (2011) Friendship and Empire: Roman Diplomacy and Imperialism in the Middle Republic (353–146 B.C.). Cambridge.Google Scholar
Carter, S. L. (2004) ‘Can religion tolerate democracy? (and vice versa?),” in Purdy, J., Kronman, A., and Farrar, C. (eds.), Democratic Vistas: Reflections on the Life of American Democracy, ch. 4. New Haven. Published online: DOI: 10.12987/yale/9780300102567.003.0005.Google Scholar
Carter, S. L. (2011) The Violence of Peace: America’s Wars in the Age of Obama. New York.Google Scholar
Cartledge, P., and Edge, M. (2009) “‘Rights’, individuals, and communities in ancient Greece,” in Balot (2009), 149–63.Google Scholar
Castner, C. (1988) Prosopography of Roman Epicureans from the Second Century B. C. to the Second Century A. D. Studien zur klassischen Philologie 34. New York.Google Scholar
Ceaser, J. (2011) “No thanks to gratitude,” Policy Review 170: 59–73, www.hoover .org/research/no-thanks-gratitude.Google Scholar
Champion, C. B. (2013) “Polybius on political constitutions, interstate relations, and imperial expansion,” in Beck, H. (ed.), Blackwell’s Companion to Ancient Greek Government, 119–30. Malden, MA.Google Scholar
Clarke, G. (2005) “Third-century Christianity,” in Bowman, A., Cameron, A., and Garnsey, P. D. A (eds.), The Cambridge Ancient History, Volume 12: The Crisis of Empire, A. D. 193–337, second edn., 589–671. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Clarke, M. T. (2014) “Doing violence to the Roman idea of liberty? Freedom as bodily integrity in Roman political thought,” HPT 35 (2): 211–33.Google Scholar
Connolly, J. (2007) The State of Speech: Rhetoric and Political Thought in Ancient Rome. Princeton.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. M., and Procopé, J. F (eds. and trans.) (1995) Seneca: Moral and Political Essays. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Cress, D. A. (ed. and trans.) (1987) Jean-Jacques Rousseau: The Basic Political Writings. Indianapolis, IN.Google Scholar
Crook, J. A. (1955) Consilium Principis: Imperial Councils and Counsellors from Augustus to Diocletian. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Dafoe, A., Renshon, J., and Huth, P. (2014) “Reputation and status as motives for war,” Annual Review of Political Science 17: 371–93.Google Scholar
Dagger, R. (1997) Civic Virtues: Rights, Citizenship, and Republican Liberalism. Oxford.Google Scholar
De Blois, L., Bons, J., Kessels, T., and Schenkeveld, D. M (eds.) (2005) The Statesman in Plutarch’s Works, Volume 2: The Statesman in Plutarch’s Greek and Roman Lives. Leiden.Google Scholar
De Ste. Croix, G. E. M. (1954) “Suffragium: from vote to patronage,” The British Journal of Sociology 5 (1): 33–48.Google Scholar
De Ste. Croix, G. E. M. (1963) “Why were the early Christians persecuted?,” Past and Present 26: 6–38. [Reprinted in de Ste. Croix (2006) Christian Persecution, Martyrdom, and Orthodoxy, M. Whitby and J. Streeter (eds.), ch. 3. Oxford.]Google Scholar
Dodaro, R. (2004a) Christ and the Just Society in the Thought of Augustine. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Dodaro, R. (2004b) “Political and theological virtues in Augustine, Letter 155 to Macedonius,” Augustiniana 54: 431–74.Google Scholar
Dyson, R. W. (ed. and trans.) (1998) Augustine: The City of God against the Pagans. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Eckstein, A. M. (2006) Mediterranean Anarchy, Interstate War, and the Rise of Rome. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Eckstein, A. M. (2008) Rome Enters the Greek East: From Anarchy to Hierarchy in the Hellenistic Mediterranean, 230–170 BC. Malden, MA.Google Scholar
Elshtain, J. B. (2003) Just War against Terror: The Burden of American Power in a Violent World. New York.Google Scholar
Erskine, A. (2011) The Hellenistic Stoa: Political Thought and Action, second edn. London.Google Scholar
Erskine, A. (2013) “How to rule the world: Polybius book 6 reconsidered,” in Gibson, B. and Harrison, T. (eds.), Polybius and His World: Essays in Memory of F. W. Walbank, 231–45. Oxford.Google Scholar
Euben, J. P. (1986) “Political corruption in Euripides’ Orestes,” in Euben, J. P (ed.), Greek Tragedy and Political Theory, 222–51. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Fantham, E. (1995) “Rewriting and rereading the Fasti: Augustus, Ovid and recent classical scholarship,” Antichthon 29: 57–84.Google Scholar
Feig Vishnia, R. (2012) Roman Elections in the Age of Cicero: Society, Government, and Voting. New York and London.Google Scholar
Ferrary, J.-L. (1974) “Le discours de Laelius dans le troisième livre du De Re Publica de Cicéron,” MEFRA 86 (2): 745–71.Google Scholar
Ferrary, J.-L. (1977) “Le discours de Philus (Cicéron, De Re Publica III, 8–31) et la philosophie de Carnéade,” REL 55: 128–56.Google Scholar
Ferrary, J.-L. (1984) “L’archéologie du De Re Publica (2, 2, 4–37, 63): Cicéron entre Polybe et Platon,” JRS 74: 87–98.Google Scholar
Ferry, L., and Kingston, R. (2008) “Introduction: the emotions and the history of political thought,” in Ferry, L. and Kingston, R. (eds.), Bringing the Passions Back In: The Emotions in Political Philosophy, 3–18. Vancouver and Toronto.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fish, J. (2011) “Not all politicians are Sisyphus: what Roman Epicureans were taught about politics,” in Fish, J. and Sanders, K. R (eds.), Epicurus and the Epicurean Tradition, 72–104. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fontana, B. [Biancamaria] (ed. and trans.) (1988) Constant: Political Writings. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Forman-Barzilai, F. (2010) Adam Smith and the Circles of Sympathy: Cosmopolitanism and Moral Theory. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Forst, R. (2013) Toleration in Conflict: Past and Present, trans. Ciaran Cronin. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. (1989) “Lucretius and politics,” in Griffin, M. and Barnes, J. (eds.), Philosophia Togata I: Essays on Philosophy and Roman Society, 120–50. Oxford.Google Scholar
Garnsey, P. (1984) “Religious toleration in classical antiquity,” in Sheils, W. J. (ed.), Persecution and Toleration, 1–27. Studies in Church History 21. Oxford.Google Scholar
Garnsey, P. (2007) Thinking about Property: From Antiquity to the Age of Revolution. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Garnsey, P. (2017) “Property and its limits: historical analysis,” in Winiger, B., Mahlmann, M., Clément, S., and Kühler, A. (eds.), La propriété et ses limites/Das Eigentum und seine Grenzen, 13–38. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Garsten, B. (2006) Saving Persuasion: A Defense of Rhetoric and Judgment. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Garver, E. (2004) For the Sake of Argument: Practical Reasoning, Character, and the Ethics of Belief. Chicago.Google Scholar
Gill, C. (2000) “Stoic writers of the Imperial era,” in C. J. Rowe and Schofield (2000), 597–615.Google Scholar
Girardet, K. (1983) Die Ordnung der Welt: Ein Beitrag zur philosophischen und politischen Interpretation von Ciceros Schrift De Legibus. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Glucker, J. (2001) “Carneades in Rome: some unsolved problems,” in Powell, J. G. F and North, J. A (eds.), Cicero’s Republic. BICS Supplement 76, 57–82. London.Google Scholar
Goldie, M. (2010) “Introduction,” in M. Goldie (ed.), John Locke: A Letter Concerning Toleration and Other Writings, ix–xxiii. Indianapolis, IN.Google Scholar
Goodin, R. E. (2000) “Democratic deliberation within,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 29: 81–109.Google Scholar
Goodman, M. (2008 [2007]) Rome and Jerusalem: The Clash of Ancient Civilizations, paperback edn. New York.Google Scholar
Gowing, A. (2005) Empire and Memory: The Representation of the Roman Republic in Imperial Culture. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gregory, E. (2008) Politics and the Order of Love: An Augustinian Ethic of Democratic Citizenship. Chicago.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. T. (2017) “Dignity in Roman and Stoic thought,” in Debes, R. (ed.), Dignity: A History, ch. 2. Oxford. Published online: DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199385997.003.0003.Google Scholar
Griffin, M. T., and Atkins, E. M (eds. and trans.) (1991) Cicero: On Duties. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Griswold, C. L. (1986) “The Vietnam veterans memorial and the Washington Mall: philosophical thoughts on political iconography,” Critical Inquiry 12 (4): 688–719.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1995) “Citizenship and national identity: some reflections on the future of Europe,” in Beiner (1995), 255–81.Google Scholar
Hahm, D. (1995) “Polybius’ applied political theory,” in Laks and Schofield (1995), 7–47.Google Scholar
Hammer, D. (2008) Roman Political Thought and the Modern Theoretical Imagination. Norman, OK.Google Scholar
Hammer, D. (ed.) (2015) A Companion to Greek Democracy and the Roman Republic. Malden, MA.Google Scholar
Hansen, M. (1999) The Athenian Democracy in the Age of Demosthenes: Structure, Principles, and Ideology, trans. J. A. Crook, second edn. London.Google Scholar
Harris, W. V. (1971) “On war and greed in the second-century BC,” American Historical Review 76: 1,371–85.Google Scholar
Harris, W. V. (1979) War and Imperialism in Republican Rome, 327–70 BC. Oxford. [Paperback edn. with new preface published in 1984.]Google Scholar
Harris, W. V. (2001) Restraining Rage: The Ideology of Anger Control in Classical Antiquity. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Hauerwas, S. (1987) “On the ‘right’ to be tribal,” Christian Scholar’s Review 16 (3): 238–41.Google Scholar
Held, D. (2003) “Cosmopolitanism: globalism tamed?,” Review of International Studies 29 (4): 465–80.Google Scholar
Hellegouarc’h, J. (1972) Le vocabulaire Latin des relations et des partis politiques sous la République. Paris.Google Scholar
Hodgson, L. (2017) Res Publica and the Roman Republic: “Without Body or Form.” Oxford.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (1993) “Conquest, competition, and consensus: Roman expansion in Italy and the rise of the nobilitas,” Historia 42: 12–39.Google Scholar
Hölkeskamp, K.-J. (2010) Reconstructing the Roman Republic: An Ancient Political Culture and Modern Research. Princeton.Google Scholar
Holmes, R. L. (1999) “St. Augustine and the just war theory,” in Matthews (1999), 323–44.Google Scholar
Honoré, T. (2010) “Ulpian, natural law and Stoic influence,” The Legal History Review 78: 199–208.Google Scholar
Ignatieff, M. (1998) The Warrior’s Honor: Ethnic War and the Modern Conscience. New York.Google Scholar
Inazu, J. (2016) Confident Pluralism: Surviving and Thriving through Deep Difference. Chicago.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. (1995) “Politics and paradox in Seneca’s De beneficiis,” in Laks and Schofield (1995), 241–65. [Reprinted in Inwood (2005), 65–94.]Google Scholar
Inwood, B., and Donini, P. L. (1999), “Stoic ethics,” in Algra, Barnes, Mansfeld, and Schofield (1999), 675–758.Google Scholar
Inwood, B., and Gerson, L. P (eds. and trans.) (1994) The Epicurus Reader: Selected Writings and Testimonia. Indianapolis, IN.Google Scholar
Inwood, B., and Miller, F. D., Jr. (2007) “Law in Roman philosophy,” in Miller, F. D, Jr. and Biondi, C. A. (eds.), A Treatise of Legal Philosophy and General Jurisprudence, Volume 6: A History of the Philosophy of Law from the Ancient Greeks to the Scholastics, 133–65. Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Johnson, J. T. (1981) Just War Tradition and the Restraint of War: A Moral and Historical Inquiry. Princeton.Google Scholar
Kahlos, M. (2007) Debate and Dialogue: Christian and Pagan Cultures c. 360–430. Aldershot.Google Scholar
Kapust, D. J. (2004) “Skinner, Pettit and Livy: the conflict of the orders and the ambiguity of republican liberty,” HPT 25 (3): 377–401.Google Scholar
Kapust, D. J. (2011a) “Cicero on decorum and the morality of rhetoric,” European Journal of Political Theory 10 (1): 92–113.Google Scholar
Kapust, D. J. (2011b) Republicanism, Rhetoric, and Roman Political Thought: Sallust, Livy, and Tacitus. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kapust, D. J., and Turner, B. P. (2013) “Democratic gentlemen and the lust for mastery: status, ambition, and the language of liberty in Hobbes’ political thought,” Political Theory 41 (4): 648–75.Google Scholar
Kass, A. A., Kass, L. R, and Schaub, D. (eds.) (2011) What So Proudly We Hail: The American Soul in Story, Speech, and Song. Wilmington, DE.Google Scholar
Kass, L. R. (2002) Life, Liberty, and the Defense of Dignity: The Challenge for Bioethics. San Francisco.Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. (1972) History of Rhetoric, Volume 2: The Art of Rhetoric in the Roman World, 300 B.C.–A.D. 300. Princeton.Google Scholar
Kenney, E. J. (ed.) (2014) Lucretius: De rerum natura Book III, second edn. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Köstermann, E. (1930) “Der Taciteische Dialogus und Ciceros Schrift de Re Publica,” Hermes 65: 396–421.Google Scholar
Laks, A., and Schofield, M. (eds.) (1995) Justice and Generosity: Studies in Hellenistic Social and Political Philosophy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lavan, M. (2016) “The spread of Roman citizenship, 14–212 CE: quantification in the face of high uncertainty,” Past and Present 230 (1): 3–46.Google Scholar
Lawrence, G. (trans.) and Mayer, J. P (ed.) (1969) Alexis de Tocqueville: Democracy in America. New York.Google Scholar
Lebow, R. N. (2001) “Thucydides the constructivist,” American Political Science Review 95 (3): 547–60.Google Scholar
Lendon, J. E. (1997) Empire of Honour: The Art of Government in the Roman World. Oxford.Google Scholar
Lenihan, D. (1988) “The just war theory in the work of Saint Augustine,” Augustinian Studies 19: 37–70.Google Scholar
Leydet, D. (2014) “Citizenship,” in E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2014 Edition), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/citizenship/.Google Scholar
Liebert, H. (2016) Plutarch’s Politics: Between City and Empire. New York and Cambridge.Google Scholar
Liebeschuetz, W. (1966) “The theme of liberty in the Agricola of Tacitus,” CQ 16: 126–39.Google Scholar
Linderski, J. (1985) “Buying the vote: electoral corruption in the late Republic,” Ancient World 11: 87–94.Google Scholar
Linderski, J. (1995) “Cicero and Roman divination,” in Roman Questions: Selected Papers, 458–84. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Lintott, A. W. (1972) “Provocatio: from the struggle of the orders to the Principate,” ANRW I.2: 226–67.Google Scholar
Lintott, A. W. (1997) “The theory of the mixed constitution at Rome,” in Barnes, J. and Griffin, M. T (eds.), Philosophia Togata II: Plato and Aristotle at Rome, 70–85. Oxford.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1995) “Cicero’s politics in De officiis,” in Laks and Schofield (1995), 213–40.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (2008) “The concept of the cosmopolitan in Greek and Roman thought,” Daedalus 137 (3): 50–58.Google Scholar
Long, A. A., and Sedley, D. N (eds.) (1987) The Hellenistic Philosophers, 2 vols. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Loraux, N. (2000) Born of the Earth: Myth and Politics in Athens, trans. S. Stewart. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
MacCoull, L. S. B. (2006) “Menas and Thomas: notes on the ‘Dialogus de Scientia Politica’,” GRBS 46: 301–13.Google Scholar
Macedo, S. (1990) Liberal Virtues: Citizenship, Virtue and Community in Liberal Constitutionalism. Oxford.Google Scholar
Maier, P. (2010) Ratification: The People Debate the Constitution, 1787–1788. New York.Google Scholar
Manent, P. A. (2006) A World Beyond Politics? A Defense of the Nation-State, trans. Marc LePain. Princeton.Google Scholar
Markus, R. A. (1970) Saeculum: History and Society in the Theology of St. Augustine. Cambridge. [Second edn. published in 1988.]Google Scholar
Markus, R. A. (1983) “St. Augustine’s views on the ‘just war’,” in Sheils, W. J (ed.), The Church and War, 1–13. Studies in Church History 20. London.Google Scholar
Markell, P. (2008) “The insufficiency of non-domination,” Political Theory 36 (1): 9–36.Google Scholar
Mattingly, H. B., and Rives, J. B (eds. and trans.) (2009) Tacitus: Agricola, Germania. London.Google Scholar
May, J. (1988) Trials of Character: The Eloquence of Ciceronian Ethos. Chapel Hill, NC.Google Scholar
Melzer, A. M., Weinberger, J., and Zinman, M. R (eds.) (1993) Technology in the Western Political Tradition. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Mendus, S. (ed.) (1988) Justifying Toleration: Conceptual and Historical Perspectives. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Milbank, J., and Pabst, A. (2016) The Politics of Virtue: Post-Liberalism and the Human Future. London and New York.Google Scholar
Millar, F. G. B. (1984) “The political character of the Classical Roman Republic, 200–151 B.C.,” JRS 74: 1–19.Google Scholar
Millar, F. G. B. (1986) “Politics, persuasion, and the people before the Social War, 150–90 B.C.,” JRS 76: 1–11.Google Scholar
Millar, F. G. B. (1995) “Popular politics at Rome in the late Republic,” in Malkin, I. and Rubinsohn, Z. (eds.), Leaders and Masses in the Roman World: Studies in Honor of Zvi Yavetz, 91–113. New York. [Reprinted in Millar (2002b), 162–82.]Google Scholar
Millar, F. G. B. (2002b) Rome, The Greek World, and the East, Volume 1: The Roman Republic and the Augustan Revolution, Cotton, H. M and Rogers, G. M (eds.). Chapel Hill, NC.Google Scholar
Miller, F. D., Jr. (1995) Nature, Justice, and Rights in Aristotle’s Politics. Oxford.Google Scholar
Minyard, J. D. (1985) Lucretius and the Late Republic: An Essay in Roman Intellectual History. Leiden.Google Scholar
Moatti, C. (2015) The Birth of Critical Thinking in Republican Rome, trans. J. Lloyd, foreward by M. Schofield. Cambridge. [English translation of Moatti (1997) La raison de Rome: Naissance de l’esprit critique à la fin de la République. Paris.]Google Scholar
Moles, J. L. (1996) “Cynic cosmopolitanism,” in Branham, R. B and Goulet-Cazé, M.-O. (eds.), The Cynics: The Cynic Movement in Antiquity and its Legacy, 105–20. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Morgan, T. (1998) “A good man skilled in politics: Quintilian’s political theory,” in Too, Y. L and Livingstone, N. (eds.), Pedagogy and Power: Rhetorics of Classical Learning, 245–62. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Morgenthau, H. (1985 [1948]) Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, sixth edn., rev. Thompson, K. W.. New York.Google Scholar
Morstein-Marx, R. (2004) Mass Oratory and Political Power in the Late Roman Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Mouritsen, H. (2015) “The incongruence of power: the Roman constitution in theory and practice,” in Hammer (2015), 146–63.Google Scholar
Nederman, C. (2000) “War, peace, and republican virtue: patriotism and the neglected legacy of Cicero,” in Thompson, N. (ed.), Instilling Ethics, 17–29. Lanham, MD.Google Scholar
Nicgorski, W. (2016) Cicero’s Skepticism and His Recovery of Political Philosophy. New York.Google Scholar
Nichols, J. H., Jr. (1976) Epicurean Political Philosophy: The De rerum natura of Lucretius. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Nicolet, C. (1980) The World of the Citizen in Republican Rome, trans. P. S. Falla. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Nippel, W. (1980) Mischverfassungstheorie und Verfassungsrealität in Antike und früher Neuzeit. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Noreña, C. F. (2011) Imperial Ideals in the Roman West: Representation, Circulation, Power. Cambridge.Google Scholar
North, J. A. (1990) “Democratic politics in Republican Rome,” Past and Present 126: 3–21.Google Scholar
North, J. A. (2003) “Religious toleration in Republican Rome,” in Ando, C. (ed.), Roman Religion, 199–219. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
North, J. A. (2006) “The constitution of the Roman Republic,” in Rosenstein and Morstein-Marx (2006), 256–77.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (1994) The Therapy of Desire: Theory and Practice in Hellenistic Ethics. Princeton.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (1996) “Patriotism and cosmopolitanism,” in Cohen, J. (ed.), For Love of Country: Debating the Limits of Patriotism, 2–17. Boston.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (1997) “Kant and Stoic cosmopolitanism,” The Journal of Political Philosophy 5 (1): 1–25.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (2000) “Duties of justice, duties of material aid: Cicero’s problematic legacy,” The Journal of Political Philosophy 8 (2): 176–206.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. (2002) “The worth of human dignity: two tensions in Stoic cosmopolitanism,” in Clark, G. and Rajak, T. (eds.), Philosophy and Power in the Greco-Roman World, 31–49. Oxford.Google Scholar
Ober, J. (2000) “Quasi-rights: political boundaries and social diversity in democratic Athens,” Social Philosophy and Policy 17 (1): 27–61.Google Scholar
Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. __. 135 S.Ct. 2584 (2015).Google Scholar
O’Donovan, O. (2004) “The political thought of City of God 19,” in O’Donovan, O. and O’Donovan, J. L (eds.), Bonds of Imperfection: Christian Politics, Past and Present, 48–72. Grand Rapids, MI.Google Scholar
Oliver, J. H. (1953) “The ruling power: a study of the Roman Empire in the second century after Christ through the ‘Roman Oration’ of Aelius Aristides,” TAPhS 43: 871–1,003.Google Scholar
O’Meara, D. (2002) “The Justinianic Dialogue On Political Science and its Neoplatonic Sources,” in Ierodiakonou, K. (ed.), Byzantine Philosophy and Its Ancient Sources, 49–62. Oxford.Google Scholar
Orend, B. (2008) “War,” in Zalta, E. N (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2008 edition), http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/war/.Google Scholar
Ostwald, M. (1996) “Shares and rights: ‘citizenship’ Greek style and American style,” in Ober, J. and Hedrick, C. (eds.), Dêmokratia: a Conversation on Democracies, Ancient and Modern, 49–61. Princeton.Google Scholar
Pagels, E. (2012) Revelations: Visions, Prophecy, and Politics in the Book of Revelation. New York.Google Scholar
Pangle, T. (1973) Montesquieu’s Philosophy of Liberalism: A Commentary on The Spirit of the Laws. Chicago.Google Scholar
Pangle, T., and Ahrensdorf, P. (1999) Justice among Nations: On the Moral Basis of Power and Peace. Lawrence, KS.Google Scholar
Pembroke, S. G. (1971) “Oikeiôsis,” in Long, A. A (ed.), Problems in Stoicism, 114–49. London.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. (2012) On the People’s Terms: A Republican Theory and Model of Democracy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Philpott, D. (2011) “Sovereignty,” in Klosko, G. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the History of Political Philosophy, 561–72. Oxford and New York.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, F. (1996) Contra arma verbis: Der Redner vor dem Volk in der späten römischen Republik. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, F. (2011a) The Consul at Rome: The Civil Functions of the Consuls in the Roman Republic. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Pina Polo, F. (2011b) “Public speaking in Rome: a question of auctoritas,” in Peachin, M. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Social Relations in the Roman World, 286–303. Oxford.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. (1975) The Machiavellian Moment: Florentine Political Thought and the Atlantic Republican Tradition. Princeton.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. (1995) “The ideal of citizenship since classical times,” in Beiner (1995), 29–52.Google Scholar
Powell, J. G. F. (2013) “The embassy of the three philosophers to Rome in 155 B.C.,” in Kremmydas, C. and Tempest, K. (eds.), Hellenistic Oratory: Continuity and Change, 219–47. Oxford.Google Scholar
Raaflaub, K. A. (1984) “Freiheit in Athen und Rom: Ein Beispiel divergierender politischer Begriffsentwicklung in der Antike,” Historische Zeitschrift 238 (3): 529–67.Google Scholar
Raaflaub, K. A. (2004) The Discovery of Freedom in Ancient Greece, trans. Renate Franciscono. Chicago.Google Scholar
Raaflaub, K. A. (2005) “From protection and defense to offense and participation: stages in the conflict of the orders,” in Raaflaub, K. A (ed.), Social Struggles in Archaic Rome: New Perspectives on the Conflict of the Orders, second edn., 185–222. Malden, MA and London.Google Scholar
Ramelli, I., and Konstan, D. (eds. and trans.) (2009) Hierocles the Stoic: Elements of Ethics, Fragments, and Excerpts. Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar
Ramsey, J. T. (2007) “Roman senatorial oratory,” in Dominik, W. and Hall, J. (eds.), A Companion to Roman Rhetoric, 122–35. Malden, MA.Google Scholar
Ramsey, P. (1992) “The just war according to St. Augustine,” in Elshtain, J. B (ed.), Just War Theory, 8–22. New York.Google Scholar
Randall, M. H. (2013) “The history of international human rights law,” in Kolb, R. and Gaggioli, G. (eds.), Research Handbook on Human Rights and Humanitarian Law, 3–34. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA.Google Scholar
Remer, G. (1999) “Political oratory and conversation: Cicero versus deliberative democracy,” Political Theory 27 (1): 39–64.Google Scholar
Remer, G. (2005) “Cicero and the ethics of deliberative rhetoric,” in Fontana, B., Nederman, C., and Remer, G. (eds.), Talking Democracy: Historical Perspectives on Rhetoric and Democracy, 135–61. University Park, PA.Google Scholar
Remer, G. (2017) Ethics and the Orator: The Ciceronian Tradition of Political Morality. Chicago.Google Scholar
Reydams-Schils, G. (2005) The Roman Stoics: Self, Responsibility, and Affection. Chicago.Google Scholar
Richard, C. (1994) The Founders and the Classics: Greece, Rome, and the American Enlightenment. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Richard, C. (2008) Greeks and Romans Bearing Gifts: How the Ancients Inspired the Founding Fathers. Lanham, MD.Google Scholar
Richard, C. (2010) Why We’re All Romans: The Roman Contribution to the Western World. Lanham, MD.Google Scholar
Richardson, J. (2008) The Language of Empire: Rome and the Idea of Empire from the Third Century B.C. to the Second Century A.D. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Riedl, M. (2010) “Truth versus utility: the debate on civil religion in the Roman Empire of the third and fourth centuries,” in Weed, R. and von Heyking, J. (eds.), Civil Religion in Political Thought: Its Perennial Questions and Enduring Relevance in North America, 47–65. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Rives, J. B. (1999) “The decree of Decius and the religion of empire,” JRS 89: 135–54.Google Scholar
Roller, M. (2001) Constructing Autocracy: Aristocrats and Emperors in Julio- Claudian Rome. Princeton.Google Scholar
Rosenstein, N., and Morstein-Marx, R. (eds.) (2006) A Companion to the Roman Republic. Malden, MA.Google Scholar
Roskam, G. (2007) Live Unnoticed (Λάθε Βιώσας): On the Vicissitudes of an Epicurean Doctrine. Leiden.Google Scholar
Rowe, C. J., and Schofield, M. (eds.) (2000) The Cambridge History of Greek and Roman Political Thought. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rutherford, R. B. (2010) “Voices of resistance,” in Kraus, C. S, Marincola, J., and Pelling, C. (eds.), Ancient Historiography and Its Contexts: Studies in Honour of A. J. Woodman, 312–30. Oxford.Google Scholar
Sandel, M. (1996) Democracy’s Discontent: America in Search of a Public Philosophy. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Sauer, J. (2015) “Dichotomy in the conception of natural law in Cicero’s De legibus?,” trans. A. Lewis., in Vesting, T. (ed.), Gesetz-Rhetorik-Gewalt, 125–53. Special issue of Ancilla Iuris.Google Scholar
Saxonhouse, A. (1975) “Tacitus’ Dialogue on Oratory: political activity under a tyrant,” Political Theory 3 (1): 53–68.Google Scholar
Schäfer, P. (1997) Judeophobia: Attitudes towards the Jews in the Ancient World. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Scheid, J. (2005) “Augustus and Roman religion: continuity, conservatism, and innovation,” in Galinsky, K. (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Augustus, 175–93. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Scheidel, W. (2011) “The Roman slave supply,” in Bradley, K. and Cartledge, P. (eds.), The Cambridge World History of Slavery, Volume 1: The Ancient Mediterranean World, 287–310. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Schiesaro, A. (2007) “Lucretius and Roman politics and history,” in Gillespie, S. and Hardie, P. R (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Lucretius, 41–58. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Schlosser, J. A. (2013) “‘Hope, danger’s comforter’: Thucydides’ History and the politics of hope,” The Journal of Politics 75 (1): 169–82.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (1995) “Cicero’s definition of res publica,” in Powell, J. G. F (ed.), Cicero the Philosopher: Twelve Papers, 63–83. Oxford.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (1999b) “Social and political thought,” in Algra, Barnes, Mansfeld, and Schofield (1999), 739–70.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (2000) “Epicurean and Stoic political thought,” in C. J. Rowe and Schofield (2000), 435–56.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (2013) “Cosmopolitanism, imperialism, and justice in Cicero’s Republic and Laws,” Intellectual History and Political Thought 2 (1): 5–34.Google Scholar
Schofield, M. (2015) “Liberty, equality, and authority: a political discourse in the later Roman Republic,” in Hammer (2015), 113–27.Google Scholar
Schrijvers, P. H. (1996) “Lucretius on the origin and development of political life (De rerum natura 5.1105–1160),” in Algra, K. A, van der Horst, P. W, and Runia, D. T. (eds.), Polyhistor: Studies in the History and Historiography of Ancient Philosophy, 220–30. Leiden.Google Scholar
Scruton, R. (2010a) “Gratitude and grace,” The American Spectator, April 2010, http://spectator.org/39831_gratitude-and-grace.Google Scholar
Segal, C. (1990) Lucretius on Death and Anxiety: Poetry and Philosophy in De rerum natura. Princeton.Google Scholar
Shah, T. S. (2016a) “Introduction: Christianity and freedom: ancient roots and historical innovations,” in Shah and Hertzke (2016), 1–32.Google Scholar
Shah, T. S. (2016b) “The roots of religious freedom in early Christian thought,” in Shah and Hertzke (2016), 33–61.Google Scholar
Shah, T. S., and Hertzke, A. D (eds.) (2016) Christianity and Freedom, Volume 1: Historical Perspectives. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Sherwin-White, A. N. (1966) The Letters of Pliny: A Historical and Social Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar
Skinner, Q. (2002) “A third concept of liberty,” Proceedings of the British Academy 117: 237–68.Google Scholar
Smith, M. F. (ed. and trans.) (2001) Lucretius: On the Nature of Things. Indianapolis, IN.Google Scholar
Snyder, J., and Khalid, A. (2016) “The rise of ‘bias response teams’ on campus,” New Republic, published online March 30, 2016; accessed March 24, 2017, https://newrepublic.com/article/132195/rise-bias-response-teams-campus.Google Scholar
Sourvinou-Inwood, C. (1990) “What is polis religion?,” in Murray, O. and Price, S. R. F (eds.), The Greek City: from Homer to Alexander, 295–322. Oxford.Google Scholar
Spragens, T. (1999) Civic Liberalism: Reflections on Our Democratic Ideals. Lanham, MD.Google Scholar
Stadter, P. (2014) “Plutarch and Rome,” in Beck, M. (ed.), A Companion to Plutarch, 13–31. Malden, MA.Google Scholar
Steel, C. E. W., and Van Der Blom, H. (2013) Community and Communication: Oratory and Politics in Republican Rome. Oxford.Google Scholar
Stockdale, J. B. (1993) Courage under Fire: Testing Epictetus’ Doctrines in a Laboratory of Human Behavior. Stanford.Google Scholar
Straumann, B. (2015) Roman Law in the State of Nature: The Classical Foundations of Hugo Grotius’ Natural Law Theory. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Straumann, B. (2016) Crisis and Constitutionalism: Roman Political Thought from the Fall of the Republic to the Age of Revolution. Oxford.Google Scholar
Streeter, J. (2006) “Appendix to chapter 5: religious toleration in classical antiquity and early Christianity,” in De Ste. Croix, G. E. M., Christian Persecution, Martyrdom, and Orthodoxy, Whitby, M. and Streeter, J. (eds.), 229–51. Oxford.Google Scholar
Stroumsa, G. G. (1998) “Tertullian on idolatry and the limits of tolerance,” in Stanton, G. N and Stroumsa, G. G. (eds.), Tolerance and Intolerance in Early Judaism and Christianity, 173–84. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Strunk, T. E. (2017) History after Liberty: Tacitus on Tyrants, Sycophants, and Republicans. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Swaminathan, S. (2009) Debating the Slave Trade: Rhetoric of British National Identity, 1759–1815. Burlington, VT.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. (1994) “The politics of recognition,” in Gutmann, A. (ed.), Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition, 25–73. Princeton.Google Scholar
Tierney, B. (1996) “Religious rights: an historical perspective,” in Witte, J., Jr. and van der Vyver, J. D. (eds.), Religious Human Rights in Global Perspective: Religious Perspectives, 17–45. The Hague, Boston, and London.Google Scholar
Tkacz, M. W., and Kries, D. (trans. and eds.) (1994) Augustine: Political Writings, introduction by Fortin, E. L.. Indianapolis, IN.Google Scholar
Trompf, G. W. (1979) The Idea of Historical Recurrence in Western Thought: From Antiquity to the Reformation. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Tully, J. H. (ed.) (1983) John Locke: A Letter Concerning Toleration. Indianapolis, IN.Google Scholar
Van Den Berg, C. (2014) The World of Tacitus’ ‘Dialogus de Oratoribus’: Aesthetics and Empire in Ancient Rome. Cambridge and New York.Google Scholar
Van Oort, J. (1991) Jerusalem and Babylon: A Study into Augustine’s City of God and the Sources of His Doctrine of the Two Cities. Leiden and New York.Google Scholar
Vasaly, A. (2015) Livy’s Political Philosophy: Power and Personality in Early Rome. Cambridge and New York.Google Scholar
Veyne, P. (1990) Bread and Circuses: Historical Sociology and Political Pluralism, trans. B. Pearce. London.Google Scholar
Villey, M. (1946) “L’ idée du droit subjectif et les systèmes juridiques romains,” Revue historique de droit français et étranger, fourth series, 24–25: 201–28. [Reprinted as “Les instituts de Gaius et l’idée du droit subjectif,” in M. Villey (1962), Leçons d’histoire de la philosophie du droit, second edn., 169–88. Paris.]Google Scholar
Villey, M. (1964) “Le genèse du droit subjectif chez Guillaume d’Occam,” Archives de philosophie du droit 9: 97–127.Google Scholar
Viroli, M. (1995) For Love of Country: An Essay on Patriotism and Nationalism. Oxford.Google Scholar
Vogt, K. (2008) Law, Reason, and the Cosmic City: Political Philosophy in the Early Stoa. Oxford.Google Scholar
Von Fritz, K. (1954) The Theory of the Mixed Constitution in Antiquity: A Critical Analysis of Polybius’ Political Ideas. New York.Google Scholar
Von Heyking, J. (2007) “Taming warriors in classical and early medieval political theory,” in Syse, H. and Reichberg, G. M (eds.), Ethics, Nationalism, and Just War: Medieval and Contemporary Perspectives, 11–35. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Walbank, F. W. (1998) “A Greek looks at Rome: Polybius VI revisited,” Scripta Classica Israelica 17: 45–59. [Reprinted in Walbank (2002), 277–92.]Google Scholar
Walbank, F. W. (2002) Polybius, Rome and the Hellenistic World: Essays and Reflections. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Walker, W. (2006) “Sallust and Skinner on civil liberty,” European Journal of Political Theory 5 (3): 237–59.Google Scholar
Wallace, R. W. (2009) “Personal freedom in Greek democracies, Republican Rome, and modern liberal states,” in Balot (2009), 164–77.Google Scholar
Walzer, M. (1977) Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations. New York.Google Scholar
Warrior, V. M. (ed. and trans.) (2006a) Livy: The History of Rome Books 1–5. Indianapolis, IN.Google Scholar
Watkins, P. (2007) Gratitude and the Good Life: Toward a Psychology of Appreciation. Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Watson, A. (trans.) (1985) The Digest of Justinian, Latin text ed. Mommsen, T. and Krueger, P.. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Watts, E. (2014) “Freedom of speech and self-censorship in the Roman Empire,” Revue Belge de philologie et d’histoire 92 (1): 157–66.Google Scholar
Weithman, P. J. (1999), “Toward an Augustinian liberalism,” in Matthews (1999), 304–22.Google Scholar
West, C. (1999) “The moral obligations of living in a democratic society,” in Batstone, D. and Mendieta, E. (eds.), The Good Citizen, 5–12. New York.Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, T. (2006) “‘This in-between book’: language, politics and genre in the Agricola,” in McGing, B. and Mossman, J. (eds.), The Limits of Ancient Biography, 305–33. Swansea.Google Scholar
Wiedemann, T. (1993) “Sallust’s Jugurtha: concord, discord and the digression,” G&R second series 40 (1): 48–57.Google Scholar
Wilken, R. L. (2016) “The Christian roots of religious freedom,” in Shah and Hertzke (2016), 62–89.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, S. (2012) Republicanism during the Early Roman Empire. London and New York.Google Scholar
Williams, R. (1987) “Politics and the soul: a reading of the City of God,” Milltown Studies 19/20: 55–72.Google Scholar
Williamson, C. (2016) “Crimes against the state,” in du Plessis, P. J, Ando, C., and Tuori, K. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Roman Law and Society, 333–44. Oxford.Google Scholar
Wirszubski, C. (1950) Libertas as a Political Idea at Rome during the Late Republic and Early Principate. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wirzba, N. (2002) (ed.) The Art of the Commonplace: The Agrarian Essays of Wendell Berry. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Wiseman, P. (2009) Remembering the Roman People: Essays on Late-Republican Politics and Literature. Oxford.Google Scholar
Wood, N. (1995) “Sallust’s theorem: a comment on ‘fear’ in western political thought,” HPT 16 (2): 174–89.Google Scholar
Woolf, G. (1998) Becoming Roman: The Origins of Provincial Civilization in Gaul. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Yakobson, A. (1999) Elections and Electioneering in Rome: A Study in the Political System of the Late Republic. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Yardley, J. C. (trans.) (2008) Tacitus, The Annals: The Reigns of Tiberius, Claudius, and Nero. Oxford.Google Scholar
Zanker, P. (1988) The Power of Images in the Age of Augustus, trans. A. Shapiro. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Zarecki, J. (2014) Cicero’s Ideal Statesman in Theory and Practice. New York and London.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. (1996) “Natural law and poetic justice: a Carneadean debate in Cicero and Vergil,” CPh 91 (4): 297–319.Google Scholar
Zetzel, J. E. G. (ed. and trans.) (1999) Cicero: On the Commonwealth and On the Laws. Cambridge. [Second edn. published in 2017.]Google Scholar
Zuckert, M. (1996) The Natural Rights Republic: Studies in the Foundation of the American Political Tradition. Notre Dame, IN.Google Scholar