Book contents
- Rewilding
- Ecological Reviews
- Rewilding
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Chapter One Rewilding: a captivating, controversial, twenty-first-century concept to address ecological degradation in a changing world
- Chapter Two History of rewilding: ideas and practice*
- Chapter Three For wilderness or wildness? Decolonising rewilding
- Chapter Four Pleistocene rewilding: an enlightening thought experiment
- Chapter Five Trophic rewilding: ecological restoration of top-down trophic interactions to promote self-regulating biodiverse ecosystems
- Chapter Six Rewilding through land abandonment
- Chapter Seven Rewilding and restoration
- Chapter Eight Understanding the factors shaping the attitudes towards wilderness and rewilding
- Chapter Nine Health and social benefits of living with ‘wild’ nature
- Chapter Ten The psychology of rewilding
- Chapter Eleven The high art of rewilding: lessons from curating Earth art
- Chapter Twelve Rewilding a country: Britain as a study case
- Chapter Thirteen Bringing back large carnivores to rewild landscapes
- Chapter Fourteen Rewilding cities
- Chapter Fifteen The role of translocation in rewilding
- Chapter Sixteen Top-down control of ecosystems and the case for rewilding: does it all add up?
- Chapter Seventeen Rewilding and the risk of creating new, unwanted ecological interactions
- Chapter Eighteen Auditing the wild: how do we assess if rewilding objectives are achieved?
- Chapter Nineteen Adaptive co-management and conflict resolution for rewilding across development contexts
- Chapter Twenty The future of rewilding: fostering nature and people in a changing world
- Index
- Plate Section (PDF Only)
- References
Chapter Ten - The psychology of rewilding
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 February 2019
Book contents
- Rewilding
- Ecological Reviews
- Rewilding
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- Chapter One Rewilding: a captivating, controversial, twenty-first-century concept to address ecological degradation in a changing world
- Chapter Two History of rewilding: ideas and practice*
- Chapter Three For wilderness or wildness? Decolonising rewilding
- Chapter Four Pleistocene rewilding: an enlightening thought experiment
- Chapter Five Trophic rewilding: ecological restoration of top-down trophic interactions to promote self-regulating biodiverse ecosystems
- Chapter Six Rewilding through land abandonment
- Chapter Seven Rewilding and restoration
- Chapter Eight Understanding the factors shaping the attitudes towards wilderness and rewilding
- Chapter Nine Health and social benefits of living with ‘wild’ nature
- Chapter Ten The psychology of rewilding
- Chapter Eleven The high art of rewilding: lessons from curating Earth art
- Chapter Twelve Rewilding a country: Britain as a study case
- Chapter Thirteen Bringing back large carnivores to rewild landscapes
- Chapter Fourteen Rewilding cities
- Chapter Fifteen The role of translocation in rewilding
- Chapter Sixteen Top-down control of ecosystems and the case for rewilding: does it all add up?
- Chapter Seventeen Rewilding and the risk of creating new, unwanted ecological interactions
- Chapter Eighteen Auditing the wild: how do we assess if rewilding objectives are achieved?
- Chapter Nineteen Adaptive co-management and conflict resolution for rewilding across development contexts
- Chapter Twenty The future of rewilding: fostering nature and people in a changing world
- Index
- Plate Section (PDF Only)
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Rewilding , pp. 182 - 200Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Bauer, N. (2016). Social values of wilderness in Europe. In Bastmeijer, K. (Ed.), Wilderness protection in Europe (pp. 94–113). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bauer, N., Wallner, A., and Hunziker, M. (2009). The change of European landscapes: human–nature relationships, public attitudes towards rewilding, and the implications for landscape management in Switzerland. Journal of Environmental Management, 90, 2910–2920.Google Scholar
Bixler, R., and Floyd, M. (1997). Nature is scary, disgusting, and uncomfortable. Environment and Behavior, 5, 202–247.Google Scholar
Buijs, A.E., Elands, B.H., and Langers, F. (2009). No wilderness for immigrants: cultural differences in images of nature and landscape preferences. Landscape and Urban Planning, 91, 113–123.Google Scholar
Chapron, G., and Treves, A. (2016). Blood does not buy goodwill: allowing culling increases poaching of a large carnivore. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 283, doi:10.1098/rspb.2015.2939Google Scholar
Clayton, S. (2003). Environmental identity: a conceptual and an operational definition. In Clayton, S. and Opotow, S. (Eds.), Identity and the natural environment (pp. 45–65). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clayton, S. (Ed.) (2012). Environment and identity. In Oxford Handbook of Environmental and Conservation Psychology (pp. 164–180). New York, NY: Oxford.Google Scholar
Clayton, S., Colléony, A., Conversy, P., et al. (2017). Transformation of experience: toward a new relationship with nature. Conservation Letters, 10, 645–651.Google Scholar
Cronon, W. (1996). The trouble with wilderness: or, getting back to the wrong nature. Environmental History, 1, 7–28.Google Scholar
Deary, H., and Warren, C.R. (2017). Divergent visions of wildness and naturalness in a storied landscape: practices and discourses of rewilding in Scotland’s wild places. Journal of Rural Studies, 54, 211–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Decker, D., Siemer, W., Leong, K., Riley, S., Rudolph, B., and Carpenter, L. (2009). Conclusion: what is wildlife management? In Manfredo, M., Vaske, J., Brown, P., Decker, D., and Duke, E. (Eds.), Wildlife and society: the science of human dimensions (pp. 315–328). Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Dowie, M. (2009). Conservation refugees: the hundred-year conflict between global conservation and native peoples. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dressel, S., Sandström, C., and Ericsson, G. (2015). A meta‐analysis of studies on attitudes toward bears and wolves across Europe 1976–2012. Conservation Biology, 29, 565–574.Google Scholar
Ford, R.M., Williams, K.J., Smith, E.L., and Bishop, I.D. (2014). Beauty, belief, and trust: toward a model of psychological processes in public acceptance of forest management. Environment and Behavior, 46, 476–506.Google Scholar
Hagerman, S.M., and Satterfield, T. (2014). Agreed but not preferred: expert views on taboo options for biodiversity conservation, given climate change. Ecological Applications, 24, 548–559. doi:10.1890/13–0400.1Google Scholar
Hasbach, P. (2014). Rewilding for human flourishing. The Counselor (Newsletter of the Oregon Counseling Association), 2–4.Google Scholar
Hausdoerffer, J. (2017). Epilogue: a conversation with Roderick Nash. In Van Horn, G. and Hausdoerffer, J. (Eds.), Wildness: relations of people and place (pp. 243–254). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Holmes, G., Sandbrook, C., and Fisher, J. (2017). Understanding conservationists’ perspective on the new-conservation debate. Conservation Biology, 31, 353–363.Google Scholar
Kareiva, P., and Marvier, M. (2012). What is conservation science? BioScience, 62, 962–969.Google Scholar
Khew, J.Y.T., Yokohari, M., and Tanaka, T. (2014). Public perceptions of nature and landscape preference in Singapore. Human Ecology, 42, 979–988.Google Scholar
Koole, S L., and Van den Berg, A.E. (2005). Lost in the wilderness: terror management, action orientation, and nature evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 1014.Google Scholar
McMahan, E.A., Cloud, J.M., Josh, P., and Scott, M. (2016). Nature with a human touch: human-induced alteration negatively impacts perceived naturalness and preferences for natural environments. Ecopsychology, 8, 54–63.Google Scholar
Monbiot, G. (2013). Feral: searching for enchantment on the frontiers of rewilding. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Prévot, A.-C., Clayton, S., and Mathevet, R. (2018). The relationship of childhood upbringing and university degree program to environmental identity: experience in nature matters. Environmental Education Research, 24, 263–279.Google Scholar
Ribe, R.G. (2002). Is scenic beauty a proxy for acceptable management? The influence of environmental attitudes on landscape perceptions. Environment and Behavior, 34, 757–780. doi:10.1177/001391602237245Google Scholar
Robbins, P., and Moore, S. (2013). Ecological anxiety disorder: diagnosing the politics of the Anthropocene. Cultural Geographies, 20, 3–19.Google Scholar
Rozin, P., Fischler, C., and Shields-Argelès, C. (2012). European and American perspectives on the meaning of natural. Appetite, 59, 448–455.Google Scholar
Rudd, M. (2011). Scientists’ opinions on the global status and management of biological diversity. Conservation Biology, 25, 1165–1175.Google Scholar
Sabloff, A. (2001). Reordering the natural world. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Salmon, E. (2017). No word. In Van Horn, G. and Hausdoerffer, J. (Eds.), Wildness: relations of people and place (pp. 24–32). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sandbrook, C., Scales, I., Vira, B., and Adams, W. (2010). Value plurality among conservation professionals. Conservation Biology, 25, 285–294.Google Scholar
Scheer, D., and Renn, O. (2014). Public perceptions of geoengineering and its consequences for public debate. Climatic Change, 125, 305–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014–1177-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soga, M., and Gaston, K.J. (2016). Extinction of experience: the loss of human–nature interactions. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 14, 94–101.Google Scholar
Soga, M., Gaston, K.J., Koyanagi, T.F., Kurisu, K., and Hanaki, K. (2016). Urban residents’ perceptions of neighbourhood nature: does the extinction of experience matter? Biological Conservation, 203, 143–150.Google Scholar
Straka, T.M., Kendal, D., and van der Ree, R. (2016). When ecological information meets high wildlife value orientations: influencing preferences of nearby residents for urban wetlands. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 21, 538–554.Google Scholar
Tang, I., Sullivan, W.C., and Chang, C. (2015). Perceptual evaluation of natural landscapes: the role of the individual connection to nature. Environment and Behavior, 47, 595–617. doi:10.1177/0013916513520604Google Scholar
Vining, J., Tyler, E., and Kweon, B.S. (2000). Public values, opinions, and emotions in restoration controversies. In Gobster, P. and Hull, R.B. (Eds.), Restoring nature: perspectives from the social sciences and humanities (pp. 143–162). Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Watson, A., Martin, S., Christensen, N., Fauth, G., and Williams, D. (2015). The relationship between perceptions of wilderness character and attitudes toward management intervention to adapt biophysical resources to a changing climate and nature restoration at Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks. Environmental Management, 56, 653–663.Google Scholar
Williams, K.J.H., and Cary, J. (2002). Landscape preferences, ecological quality, and biodiversity protection. Environment and Behavior, 34, 257–274.Google Scholar
Zaradic, P.A., Pergams, O.R., and Kareiva, P. (2009). The impact of nature experience on willingness to support conservation. PLoS ONE, 4(10), e7367.Google Scholar
- 2
- Cited by