Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T13:08:58.520Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter Eighteen - Auditing the wild: how do we assess if rewilding objectives are achieved?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 February 2019

By
Richard T. Corlett
Edited by
Nathalie Pettorelli ,
Sarah M. Durant  and
Johan T. du Toit
Nathalie Pettorelli
Affiliation:
Institute of Zoology, London
Sarah M. Durant
Affiliation:
Institute of Zoology, London
Johan T. du Toit
Affiliation:
Utah State University
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Rewilding , pp. 375 - 385
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arts, K., Fischer, A., and van der Wal, R. (2016). Boundaries of the wolf and the wild: a conceptual examination of the relationship between rewilding and animal reintroduction. Restoration Ecology, 24, 27–34.Google Scholar
Brudvig, L.A. (2017). Toward prediction in the restoration of biodiversity. Journal of Applied Ecology, 54, 1013–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cerqueira, Y., Navarro, L.M., Maes, J., Marta-Pedroso, C., Pradinho Honrado, J., and Pereira, H.M. (2015). Ecosystem services: the opportunities of rewilding in Europe. In Pereira, H.M. and Navarro, L.M. (Eds.), Rewilding European landscapes (pp. 47–64). Cham: Springer International.Google Scholar
Colebourn, P., and Kite, B. (2017). Anthropogenic rewilding: an oxymoron? In Practice – Bulletin of the Chartered Institute of Ecology and Environmental Management, 95, 16–20.Google Scholar
Conservation Measures Partnership. (2013). Open standards for the practice of conservation. Version 3.0. Conservation Measures Partnership.Google Scholar
Cook, W., van Bommel, S., and Turnhout, E. (2016). Inside environmental auditing: effectiveness, objectivity, and transparency. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 18, 33–39.Google Scholar
Cooper, N., Brady, E., Steen, H., and Bryce, R. (2016). Aesthetic and spiritual values of ecosystems: recognising the ontological and axiological plurality of cultural ecosystem ‘services’. Ecosystem Services, 21, 218–229.Google Scholar
Corlett, R.T. (2016). The role of rewilding in landscape design for conservation. Current Landscape Ecology Reports, 1, 127–133.Google Scholar
Deary, H., and Warren, C.R. (2017). Divergent visions of wildness and naturalness in a storied landscape: practices and discourses of rewilding in Scotland’s wild places. Journal of Rural Studies, 54, 211–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durant, S.M., Becker, M.S., Creel, S., et al. (2015). Developing fencing policies for dryland ecosystems. Journal of Applied Ecology, 52, 544–551.Google Scholar
Fernandez, F.A.S., Rheingantz, M.L., Genes, L., et al. (2017). Rewilding the Atlantic Forest: restoring the fauna and ecological interactions of a protected area. Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation, 15, 308–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernández, N., Navarro, L.M., and Pereira, H.M. (2017). Rewilding: a call for boosting ecological complexity in conservation. Conservation Letters, 10, 276–278.Google Scholar
Fuller, R.J., Williamson, T., Barnes, G., and Dolman, P.M. (2017). Human activities and biodiversity opportunities in pre-industrial cultural landscapes: relevance to conservation. Journal of Applied Ecology, 54, 459–469.Google Scholar
IUCN. (2012). IUCN Red List categories and criteria version 3.1, 2nd edition. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.Google Scholar
Jain, R.K., Cui, Z.C., and Domen, J.K. (2016). Environmental auditing. In Jain, R.K., Cui, Z.C., and Domen, J.K. (Eds.), Environmental impact of mining and mineral processing (pp. 201–227). Boston, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
Jørgensen, D. (2015). Rethinking rewilding. Geoforum, 65, 482–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karanth, K.K., and Kudalkar, S. (2017). History, location, and species matter: insights for human–wildlife conflict mitigation from India. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 22, 331–346.Google Scholar
Kirby, K. (2017). Viewpoint: Are there too many or too few large herbivores in our woods? In Practice – Bulletin of the Chartered Institute of Ecology and Environmental Management, 95, 11–14.Google Scholar
Law, A., Gaywood, M.J., Jones, K.C., Ramsay, P., and Willby, N.J. (2017). Using ecosystem engineers as tools in habitat restoration and rewilding: beaver and wetlands. Science of the Total Environment, 605, 1021–1030.Google Scholar
Lorimer, J., and Driessen, C. (2013). Bovine biopolitics and the promise of monsters in the rewilding of Heck cattle. Geoforum, 48, 249–259.Google Scholar
McDonald, T., Gann, G.D., Jonson, J., and Dixon, K.W. (2016). International standards for the practice of ecological restoration– including principles and key concepts. Washington, DC: Society for Ecological Restoration.Google Scholar
Mills, C.H., Gordon, C.E., and Letnic, M. (2018). Rewilded mammal assemblages reveal the missing ecological functions of granivores. Functional Ecology, 32, 475–485.Google Scholar
Monbiot, G. (2013). Feral: searching for enchantment in the frontiers of rewilding. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Müller, A., Bøcher, P.K., and Svenning, J.-C. (2015). Where are the wilder parts of anthropogenic landscapes? A mapping case study for Denmark. Landscape and Urban Planning, 144, 90–102.Google Scholar
Müller, A., Bøcher, P.K., Fischer, C., and Svenning, J.-C. (2018). ‘Wild’ in the city context: do relative wild areas offer opportunities for urban biodiversity? Landscape and Urban Planning, 170, 256–265.Google Scholar
Murray, M. (2017). Wild pathways of inclusive conservation. Biological Conservation, 214, 206–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navarro, L.M., and Pereira, H.M. (2015). Rewilding abandoned landscapes in Europe. In Pereira, H.M. and Navarro, L.M. (Eds.), Rewilding European landscapes (pp. 3–23). Cham: Springer International.Google Scholar
Navarro, L.M., Proença, V., Kaplan, J.O., and Pereira, H.M. (2015). Maintaining disturbance-dependent habitats. In Pereira, H.M. and Navarro, L.M. (Eds.), Rewilding European landscapes (pp. 143–167). Cham: Springer International.Google Scholar
Nogués-Bravo, D., Simberloff, D., Rahbek, C., and Sanders, N.J. (2016). Rewilding is the new Pandora’s box in conservation. Current Biology, 26, R87–R91.Google Scholar
Pheasant, R.J., and Watts, G.R. (2015). Towards predicting wildness in the United Kingdom. Landscape and Urban Planning, 133, 87–97.Google Scholar
Pires, M.M. (2017). Rewilding ecological communities and rewiring ecological networks. Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation, 15, 257–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prior, J., and Ward, K.J. (2016). Rethinking rewilding: a response to Jørgensen. Geoforum, 69, 132–135.Google Scholar
Sandom, C.J., and Macdonald, D.W. (2015). What next? Rewilding as a radical future for the British countryside. In Macdonald, D.W. and Feber, R.E. (Eds.), Wildlife conservation on farmland (pp. 291–316) Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seddon, P.J., Moehrenschlager, A., and Ewen, J. (2014). Reintroducing resurrected species: selecting DeExtinction candidates. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 29, 140–147.Google Scholar
Seoray-Pillai, N., and Pillay, N. (2017). A meta-analysis of human–wildlife conflict: South African and global perspectives. Sustainability, 9, 34.Google Scholar
Svenning, J.C., Pedersen, P.B.M., Donlan, C.J., et al. (2016). Science for a wilder Anthropocene: synthesis and future directions for trophic rewilding research. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113, 898–906.Google Scholar
Vera, F.W.M. (2009). Large-scale nature development – the Oostvaardersplassen. Bristish Wildlife, 2009(June), 28–36.Google Scholar
Zamboni, T., Di Martino, S., and Jiménez-Pérez, I. (2017). A review of a multispecies reintroduction to restore a large ecosystem: the Iberá Rewilding Program (Argentina). Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation, 15, 248–256.Google Scholar
Zefferman, E.P., McKinney, M.L., Cianciolo, T., and Fritz, B.I. (2018). Knoxville’s urban wilderness: moving toward sustainable multifunctional management. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 29, 357–366.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×