Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T01:09:43.476Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 3 - Normative Changes and Individual Differences in Retaliation Judgments

A Constructivist Developmental Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 July 2021

By
Courtney L. Ball ,
Judith G. Smetana ,
Jessica S. Caporaso ,
Janet J. Boseovski  and
Stuart Marcovitch
Edited by
Holly Recchia  and
Cecilia Wainryb
Holly Recchia
Affiliation:
Concordia University, Montréal
Cecilia Wainryb
Affiliation:
University of Utah
Get access

Summary

This chapter addresses several central issues in the study of revenge during childhood and adolescence, focusing specifically on moral evaluations of retaliation and retributive justice. We begin by distinguishing among relevant concepts and consider their respective moral status by discussing their moral-philosophical foundations. Next, we summarize and critique classic developmental psychology research on children’s reasoning about retaliation, focusing on Piaget’s (1932) early work but also addressing Kohlberg’s (1981) account when appropriate. This is followed by a discussion of social-cognitive domain theory (SCDT), a constructivist developmental perspective that we assert is better able than earlier psychological approaches to address the ambiguities of provocation, retaliation, and revenge. Consistent with recent trends in SCDT research, we also consider individual differences in children’s evaluations and responses to provocation, focusing on research investigating the social and psychological correlates of retaliatory aggression. Finally, the chapter concludes with a review of key findings and suggestions for future research.

Keywords

Moral developmentmoral reasoning and judgmentsreciprocityretaliationrevengeretributive justiceprovocationaggressionempathyexecutive function
Type
Chapter
Information
Revenge across Childhood and Adolescence , pp. 37 - 75
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ardila-Rey, A., Killen, M., & Brenick, A. (2009). Moral reasoning in violent contexts: Displaced and non-displaced Colombian children’s evaluations of moral transgressions, retaliation, and reconciliation. Social Development, 18, 181–209. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00483.xGoogle Scholar
Aristotle (2000). Aristotle: Nicomachean ethics. In Crisp, R. (Ed.), Cambridge texts in the history of philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511802058Google Scholar
Armsby, R. E. (1971). A reexamination of the development of moral judgments in children. Child Development, 42, 1241–1248. doi: 10.2307/1127807Google Scholar
Arsenio, W. F., Cooperman, S., & Lover, A. (2000). Affective predictors of preschoolers’ aggression and peer acceptance: Direct and indirect effects. Developmental Psychology, 36, 438–448. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.36.4.438CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arsenio, W. F., & Gold, J. (2006). The effects of social injustice and inequality on children’s moral judgments and behavior: Towards a theoretical model. Cognitive Development, 21, 388–400. doi: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2006.06.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arsenio, W. F., & Gold, J., & Adams, E. (2006). Children’s conceptions and displays of moral emotions. In Killen, M. & Smetana, J. G. (Eds.), Handbook of moral development (pp. 581–609). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
Astor, R. A. (1994). Children’s moral reasoning about family and peer violence: The role of provocation and retribution. Child Development, 65, 1054–1067. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1994.tb00802.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bacon, F. (1632). Of revenge. In The Essays or Counsels, Civil and Moral. London, England: John Haviland.Google Scholar
Ball, C. L., & Smetana, J. G. (2017). Children’s evaluations of retaliation in the context of different peer relationships. Paper presented at the 2017 Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Austin, TX.Google Scholar
Ball, C. L., Smetana, J. G., & Sturge-Apple, M. L. (2017). Following my head and my heart: Integrating preschoolers’ empathy, theory of mind, and moral judgments. Child Development, 88, 597–611. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12605CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barchard, K., & Atkins, C. (1991). Children’s decisions about naughtiness and punishment: Dominance of expiatory punishments. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 5, 109–115. doi: 10.1080/02568549109594808Google Scholar
Batson, C. D., Kennedy, C. L., Nord, L., Stocks, E. L., Fleming, D. A., Marzettel, C. M., & Zerger, T. (2007) Anger at unfairness: Is it moral outrage? European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 1272–1285. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.434Google Scholar
Bentham, J. (1962). The works of Jeremy Bentham. Bowring, J. (Ed.), New York: Russell & Russell, Inc.Google Scholar
Berg-Cross, L. G. (1975). Intentionality, degree of damage, and moral judgments. Child Development, 46, 970–974. doi: 10.2307/1128406Google Scholar
Berndt, T. J. (1977). The effect of reciprocity norms on moral judgments and causal attribution. Child Development, 48, 1322–1330. doi: 10.2307/1128490Google Scholar
Berndt, T. J. (1979). Lack of acceptance of reciprocity norms in preschool children. Developmental Psychology, 15, 662–663. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.15.6.662Google Scholar
Berndt, T. J., & Berndt, E. G. (1975). Children’s use of motives and intentionality in person perception and moral judgment. Child Development, 46, 904–912. doi: 10.2307/1128396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caporaso, J. S., Boseovski, J. J., & Marcovitch, S. (2019). The individual contributions of three executive functions to preschool social competence. Infant and Child Development, 1–17. doi: 10.1002/icd.2132Google Scholar
Carbonneau, R., Boivin, M., Brendgen, M., Nagin, D., & Tremblay, R. (2015). Comorbid development of disruptive behaviors from age 1½ to 5 years in a population birth-cohort and association with school adjustment in first grade. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 44, 677–690. doi: 10.1007/s10802-015-0072-1Google Scholar
Card, N. A., Stucky, B. D., Sawalani, G. M., & Little, T. D. (2008). Direct and indirect aggression during childhood and adolescence: A meta-analytic review of gender differences, intercorrelations, and relations to maladjustment. Child Development, 79, 1185–1229. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01184.x.Google Scholar
Carlsmith, K. M., & Darley, J. M. (2008). Psychological aspects of retributive justice. In Zanna, M. P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 193–236). San Diego, CA: Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(07)00004-4Google Scholar
Carlsmith, K. M., Darley, J. M., & Robinson, P. H. (2002). Why do we punish? Deterrence and just deserts as motives for punishment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 284–299. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.83.2.284Google Scholar
Carlsmith, K. M., Wilson, T. D., & Gilbert, D. T. (2008). The paradoxical consequences of revenge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1316–1324. doi: 10.1037/a0012165Google Scholar
Cohen, D., Nisbett, R. E., Bowdle, B. F., & Schwarz, N. (1996). Insult, aggression, and the southern culture of honor: An “experimental ethnography.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 945–960. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.70.5.945CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coie, J. D., & Dodge, K. A. (1998). Aggression and antisocial behavior. In Damon, W. (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (5th ed., Vol. 3). Eisenberg, N. (Ed.), Social, emotional, and personality development (pp. 779–862). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Crick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A. (1994). A review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in children’s social adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 74–101.Google Scholar
Dahl, A., Campos, J. J., & Witherington, D. C. (2011). Emotional action and communication in early moral development. Emotion Review, 3, 147–157. doi: 10.1177/1754073910387948Google Scholar
Dahl, A., Sherlock, B. R., Campos, J. J., & Theunissen, F. E. (2014). Mothers’ tone of voice depends on the nature of infants’ transgressions. Emotion, 14, 651–665. doi: 10.1037/a0036608Google Scholar
Darley, J. M., & Pittman, T. S. (2003). The psychology of compensatory and retributive justice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7, 324–336. doi: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0704_05CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Darley, J. M., & Zanna, M. P. (1982). Making moral judgments: Certain culturally transmitted excuses are generally believed to absolve people of blame for harming others. American Scientist, 70, 515–521. www.jstor.org/stable/27851660Google Scholar
de Waal, F. (1996). Good natured: The origins of right and wrong in humans and other animals. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dodge, K. A, & Coie, J. D. (1987). Social-information-processing factors in reactive and proactive aggression in children’s peer groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1146–1158. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.53.6.1146Google Scholar
Dodge, K. A, Lansford, J. E., Burks, V. S., Bates, J. E., Pettit, G. S., Fontaine, R., & Price, J. M. (2003). Peer rejection and social information-processing factors in the development of aggressive behavior problems in children. Child Development, 74, 374–393. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.7402004Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. (1977). Taking rights seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Eisner, M., & Malti, T. (2015). Aggressive and violent behavior. In Lerner, R. M. & Lamb, M. E. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and development: Socioemotional processes. Somerset, NJ: Wiley. doi: 10.1002/9781118963418.childpsy319Google Scholar
Elenbaas, L. (2019). Interwealth contact and young children’s concern for equity. Child Development, 90, 108–116. doi: 10.1111/cdev.13157Google Scholar
Elenbaas, L., & Killen, M. (2016). How do young children expect others to address resource inequalities between groups?. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 150, 72–86. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2016.05.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elgat, G. (2017). Nietzsche’s psychology of ressentiment: Revenge and justice in on the geneaology of morals. Routledge: Taylor & Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erdley, C. A., & Asher, S. R. (1998). Linkages between children’s beliefs about the legitimacy of aggression and their behavior. Social Development, 7, 321–339. doi: 10.1111/1467-9507.00070Google Scholar
Ferguson, T. J., & Rule, B. G. (1980). The effects of inferential set, outcome severity, and basis for responsibility on children’s evaluations of aggressive acts. Developmental Psychology, 16, 141–146. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.16.2.141Google Scholar
Ferguson, T. J., & Rule, B. G. (1982). Influence of inferential set, outcome intent, and outcome severity on children’s moral judgments. Developmental Psychology, 18, 843–851. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.18.6.843Google Scholar
Ferguson, T. J., & Rule, B. G. (1988). Children’s evaluations of retaliatory aggression. Child Development, 59, 961–968. doi: 10.2307/1130262Google Scholar
Fiske, A. P., & Tetlock, P. E. (1997). Taboo trade-offs: Reactions to transactions that transgress the spheres of justice. Political Psychology, 18, 255–297. doi: 10.1111/0162-895X.00058Google Scholar
Fite, P. J., Hendrickson, M., Rubens, S. L., Gabrielli, J., & Evans, S. (2013). The role of peer rejection in the link between reactive aggression and academic performance. Child and Youth Care Forum, 42, 193–205. doi: 10.1007/s10566-013-9199-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, K. S., Newman, J. B., & Onyewuenyi, A. (2014). Aggressive forms and functions on school playgrounds: Profile variations in interactive styles, bystander actions, and victimization. Journal of Early Adolescence, 34, 285–310. doi: 10.1177/0272431613496638Google Scholar
Frey, K. S., Pearson, C. R., & Cohen, D. (2015). Revenge is seductive, if not sweet: Why friends matter for prevention efforts. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 37, 25–35. doi: 10.1016/j.appdev.2014.08.002Google Scholar
Frick, P. J., Ray, J. V., Thornton, L. C., & Kahn, R. E. (2014). Annual research review: A developmental psychopathology approach to understanding callous–unemotional traits in children and adolescents with serious conduct problems. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 55, 532–548. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12152Google Scholar
Frijda, N. H. (1994). The lex talionis: On vengeance. In van Goozen, S. H. M., Van De Poll, N. E., & Sergeant, J. A. (Ed.), Emotions: Essays on emotion theory (pp. 263–289). Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gasser, L., Malti, T., & Gutzwiller-Helfenfinger, E. (2012). Aggressive and nonaggressive children’s moral judgments and moral emotion attributions in situations involving retaliation and unprovoked aggression. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 173, 417–439. doi: 10.1080/00221325.2011.614650Google Scholar
Gewirth, A. (1978). Reason and morality. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gollwitzer, M., Meder, M., & Schmitt, M. (2011). What gives victims satisfaction when they seek revenge? European Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 364–374. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.782Google Scholar
Grueneich, R. (1982). Issues in the developmental study of how children use intention and consequence information to make moral judgments. Child Development, 53, 29–43. doi: 10.2307/1129636Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1990). Moral consciousness and communicative action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Haff, D. W., Floyd, H. H., & Shinn, L. K. (2006). Acceptance patterns of retaliatory aggression among adjudicated youth by sex and race. Psychological Reports, 99, 335–342. doi: 10.2466/PRO.99.2.335-342Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1821/1942). The philosophy of right. (T. Knox, Trans.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/oseo/instance.00079560Google Scholar
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: John Wiley & Sons. doi: 10.1037/10628-000Google Scholar
Helwig, C. C. (2008). The moral judgments of the child reevaluated: Heteronomy, early morality, and reasoning about social justice and inequalities. In Wainryb, C., Smetana, J. G., & Turiel, E. (Eds.), Social development, social inequalities, and social justice (pp. 44–49). New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Helwig, C. C. (2017). Identifying universal developmental processes amid contextual variations in moral judgment and reasoning. Human Development, 60, 342–349. doi: 10.1159/000485453Google Scholar
Helwig, C. C., Zelazo, P. D., & Wilson, M. (2001). Children’s judgments of psychological harm in normal and noncanonical situations. Child Development, 72, 66–81. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00266Google Scholar
Hewitt, L. S. (1975). The effects of provocation, intentions, and consequences on children’s moral judgments. Child Development, 46, 540–544. doi: 10.2307/1128155Google Scholar
Hill, A. L., Degnan, K. A Calkins, S. D., & Keane, S. P. (2006). Profiles of externalizing behavior problems for boys and girls across preschool: The roles of emotion regulation and inattention. Developmental Psychology, 42, 913–28. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.42.5.913Google Scholar
Hoffman, M. (2000). Empathy and moral development. Implications for justice and caring. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511805851.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jambon, M., & Smetana, J. G. (2014). Moral complexity in middle childhood: Children’s evaluations of necessary harm. Developmental Psychology, 50, 22–33. doi: 10.1037/a0032992Google Scholar
Jambon, M., & Smetana, J. G. (2018a). Individual differences in prototypical moral and conventional judgements and children’s proactive and reactive aggression. Child Development, 1–17. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12757Google Scholar
Jambon, M., & Smetana, J. G. (2018b). Callous-unemotional traits moderate the association between children’s early moral understanding and aggression: A short-term longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 54, 903–915. doi: 10.1037/dev0000473Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1785/1959). Foundations of the metaphysics of morals. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1788/1956). Critique of practical reason (L. W. Beck, Trans.). New York: Macmillan Publishing.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1790/1952). The science of right (W. Hastie, Trans.). In Hutchins, R. (Ed.), Great books of the Western world (pp. 397–446). Edinburgh, Scotland: T. & T. Clark.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1797/2017). The metaphysics of morals. (M. Gregor, Trans.). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Karniol, R. (1978). Children’s use of intention cues in evaluating behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 76–85.doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.85.1.76Google Scholar
Karniol, R., & Miller, D. T. (1981). Morality and the development of conceptions of justice. In Lerner, M. J. & Lerner, S. C. (Eds.), The justice motive in social behavior: Adapting to times of scarcity and change (pp. 73–89). New York, NY: Plenum. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4899-0429-4_5Google Scholar
Karniol, R., & Heiman, T. (1987). Situational antecedents of children’s anger experiences and subsequent responses to adult versus peer provokers. Aggressive Behavior, 13, 109–118. doi: 10.1002/1098-2337(1987)13:3<109::AID-AB2480130302>3.0.CO;2-TGoogle Scholar
Keasey, C. B. (1978). Children’s developing awareness and usage of intentionality and motives. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 25, 220–260.Google Scholar
Keller, M., Lourenço, O., Malti, T., & Saalbach, H. (2003). The multifaceted phenomenon of “happy victimizers”: A cross‐cultural comparison of moral emotions. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 21, 1–18. doi: 10.1348/026151003321164582Google Scholar
Killen, M., Elenbaas, L., & Rutland, A. (2015). Balancing the fair treatment of others while preserving group identity and autonomy. Human Development, 58(4–5), 253–272. doi: 10.1159/000444151Google Scholar
Killen, M., Henning, A., Kelly, M. C., Crystal, D., & Ruck, M. (2007). Evaluations of interracial peer encounters by majority and minority U.S. children and adolescents. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31, 491 – 500.Google Scholar
Killen, M., Mulvey, K. L., Richardson, C., Jampol, N., & Woodward, A. (2011). The accidental transgressor: Morally-relevant theory of mind. Cognition, 119, 197–215. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.01.006Google Scholar
Killen, M., & Smetana, J. G. (2015). Origins and development of morality. In Lerner, R. M. (Series Ed.) & Lamb, M. (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol. 3, Social and emotional development (7th ed., pp. 701–749). New York: Wiley/Blackwell.Google Scholar
Knafo, A., Zahn-Waxler, C., Van Hulle, C., Robinson, J. L., & Rhee, S. H. (2008). The developmental origins of a disposition toward empathy: Genetic and environmental contributions. Emotion, 8, 737–752. doi: 10.1037/a0014179Google Scholar
Kohlberg, L. (1981). Essays on moral development. Vol. 1. The philosophy of moral development. San Francisco, CA: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Lagerzpetz, K. M., & Westman, M. (1980). Moral approval of aggressive acts: A preliminary investigation. Aggressive Behavior, 6, 119–130. doi: 10.1002/1098-2337(1980)6:2<119::AID-AB2480060203>3.0.CO;2-Y3.0.CO;2-Y>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemerise, E. A., Thorn, A., & Maulden Costello, J. (2017). Affective ties and social information processing. Social Development, 26, 475–488. doi: 10.1111/sode.12207Google Scholar
Lickona, T. (1976). Research on Piaget’s theory of moral development. In Lickona, T. (Ed.), Moral development and behavior: Theory, research, and social issues (pp. 219–240). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Masten, A. S., Roismen, G. I., Long, J. D., Burt, K. B., Obradovic, J., Riley, J. R., Boelcke-Stennes, K., & Tellegen, A. (2005). Developmental cascades: Linking academic achievement and externalizing and internalizing symptoms over 20 years. Developmental Psychology, 41, 733–746. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.41.5.733Google Scholar
McDonald, K. L., & Asher, S. A. (2018). Pacifists and revenge-seekers in response to unambiguous peer provocation. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47, 1907–1925. doi: 10.1007/s10964-017-0767-4Google Scholar
Miller, D. T., & McCann, C. D. (1979). Children’s reactions to the perpetrators and victims of injustices. Child Development, 50, 861–868. doi: 10.2307/1128955Google Scholar
Moore, M. S. (1997). Placing blame: A theory of criminal law. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Murray-Close, D., Crick, N. R., & Galotti, K. M. (2006). Children’s moral reasoning regarding physical and relational aggression. Social Development, 15, 345–372. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9507.2006.00346.xGoogle Scholar
Moffitt, T. E., Caspi, A., Rutter, M., & Silva, P. (2001). Sex differences in antisocial behavior: Conduct disorder, delinquency and violence in the Dunedin longitudinal study. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511490057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nærde, A., Ogden, T., Janson, H., & Zachrisson, H. D. (2014). Normative development of physical aggression from 8 to 26 months. Developmental Psychology, 50(6), 1710–1720.doi: 10.1037/a0036324Google Scholar
Nelson-le Gall, S. A. (1985). Motive–outcome matching and outcome foreseeability: Effects on attribution of intentionality and moral judgments. Developmental Psychology, 21, 332–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NICHD Early Child Care Research Network, & Arsenio, W. F. (2004). Trajectories of physical aggression from toddlerhood to middle childhood: Predictors, correlates, and outcomes. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 69, vii-143.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, F. (1887/2006). On the genealogy of morals. (C. Diethe, Trans.). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nozick, R. (1981). Philosophical explanations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Nunner-Winkler, G. (2013). Moral motivation and the happy victimizer phenomenon. In Heinrichs, K., Oser, F., & Lovat, T. (Eds.), Handbook of moral motivation: Theories, models, applications (pp. 267–288). Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Sense. doi: 10.1007/978-94-6209-275-4_16Google Scholar
Olson, K. R., & Dweck, C. S. (2008). A blueprint for social cognitive development. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 193–202. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00074.xGoogle Scholar
Orobio de Castro, B., Verhulp, E. E., & Runions, K. (2012). Rage and revenge: Highly aggressive boys’ explanations for their responses to ambiguous provocation. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 331–350. doi: 10.1080/17405629.2012.680304Google Scholar
Ostrov, J. M., Murray-Close, D., Godleski, S. A., & Hart, E. J. (2013). Prospective associations between forms and functions of aggression and social and affective processes during early childhood. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 116, 19–26. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2012.12.009Google Scholar
Parker, J. G., & Asher, S. R. (1987). Peer relations and later personal adjustment: Are low-accepted children at risk? Psychological Bulletin, 86, 357–389. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.102.3.357Google Scholar
Peets, K., Hodges, E. V., & Salmivalli, C. (2011). Actualization of social cognitions into aggressive behavior toward disliked targets. Social Development, 20, 233–250. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9507.2010.00581.xGoogle Scholar
Peets, K., Hodges, E. V., & Salmivalli, C. (2013). Forgiveness and its determinants depending on the interpersonal context of hurt. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 114, 131–145. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2012.05.009Google Scholar
Peets, K., Hodges, E. V., Kikas, E., & Salmivalli, C. (2007). Hostile attributions and behavioral strategies in children: Does relationship type matter?. Developmental Psychology, 43, 889–900. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.43.4.889Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1932). The moral judgment of the child. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. New York: International Universities Press. doi: 10.1037/11494-000Google Scholar
Posada, R., & Wainryb, C. (2008). Moral development in a violent society: Colombian children’s judgments in the context of survival and revenge. Child Development, 79, 882–898. doi:10.1111/j.1467- 8624.2008.01165.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J. (1955/1999). Two concepts of rules. In Freeman, S. (Ed.), John Rawls, collected papers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Recchia, H., Wainryb, C., & Pasupathi, M. (2013). “Two for flinching”: Children’s and adolescents’ narrative accounts of harming their friends and siblings. Child Development, 84, 1459–1474. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12059Google Scholar
Repacholi, B., & Slaughter, V. (Eds.). (2004). Individual differences in theory of mind: Implications for typical and atypical development. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Richardson, C. B., Mulvey, K. L., & Killen, M. (2012). Extending social domain theory with a process-based account of moral judgments. Human Development, 55, 4–25. doi: 10.1159/000335362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, H. S., & Conant, C. L. (1992). The social structure of early conflict: Interaction, relationships, and alliances. In Shantz, C. U. & Hartup, W. W. (Eds.), Conflict in child and adolescent development (pp. 153–185). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rubin, K. H., Bream, L. Α., & Rose-Krasnor, L. (1991). Social problem solving and aggression in children. In Pepler, D. J. & Rubin, Κ. H. (Eds.), The development and treatment of childhood aggression (pp. 219–248). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Runions, K. C. (2013). Toward a conceptual model of motive and self-control in cyber-aggression: Rage, revenge, reward, and recreation. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42, 751–771. doi: 10.1007/s10964-013-9936-2Google Scholar
Shantz, D. W., & Pentz, T. (1972). Situational effects on justifiableness of aggression at three age levels. Child Development, 43, 274–281. doi: 10.2307/1127893Google Scholar
Shantz, D. W., & Voydanoff, D. A. (1973). Situational effects on retaliatory aggression at three age levels. Child Development, 44, 149–153. doi: 10.2307/1127692Google Scholar
Shultz, T. R., Wright, K., & Schleifer, M. (1986). Assignment of moral responsibility and punishment. Child Development, 57, 177–184. doi: 10.2307/1130649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slomkowski, C. L., & Killen, M. (1992). Young children’s conceptions of transgressions with friends and nonfriends. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 15, 247–258. doi: 10.1177/016502549201500205Google Scholar
Smetana, J. G., & Ball, C. L. (2018). Young children’s moral judgments, justifications, and emotion attributions in peer relationship contexts. Child Development, 89, 2245–2263. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12846Google Scholar
Smetana, J. G., Campione-Barr, N., & Yell, N. (2003). Children’s moral and affective judgments regarding provocation and retaliation. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49, 209–236. doi: 10.1353/mpq.2003.0010Google Scholar
Smetana, J. G., Daddis, C., Toth, S. L., Cicchetti, D., Bruce, J. & Kane, P. (1999). Effects of provocation on maltreated and nonmaltreated preschoolers’ understanding of moral transgressions. Social Development, 3, 335–348. doi: 10.1111/1467-9507.00099Google Scholar
Smetana, J. G., Jambon, M., & Ball, C. L. (2014). The social domain approach to children’s moral and social judgments. In Killen, M. & Smetana, J. G. (Eds.), Handbook of moral development (pp. 23–45). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Smetana, J. G., Jambon, M., & Ball, C. L. (2018). Normative changes and individual differences in early moral judgments: A constructivist developmental perspective. Human Development, 61, 264–280. doi: 10.1159/000492803Google Scholar
Smetana, J. G., Toth, S. L., Cicchetti, D., Bruce, J., Kane, P., & Daddis, C. (1999). Maltreated and nonmaltreated preschoolers’ conceptions of hypothetical and actual moral transgressions. Developmental Psychology, 35, 259–281. doi: 10.1037/0012-649.35.1.269Google Scholar
Smith, C. E., & Warneken, F. (2016). Children’s reasoning about distributive and retributive justice across development. Developmental Psychology, 52, 613–628. doi: 10.1037/a0040069Google Scholar
Tetlock, P. E., Peterson, R. S., & Lerner, J. S. (1996). Revising the value pluralism model: Incorporating social content and context postulates. In Seligman, C., Olson, J. M., & Zanna, M. P. (Eds.), The Ontario symposium on personality and social psychology (pp. 25–51). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Thibaut, J. W., & Riecken, H. W. (1955). Authoritarianism, status and the communication of aggression. Human Relations, 8, 95–120. doi: 10.1177/001872675500800201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tisak, M. S., & Turiel, E. (1988). Variation in seriousness of transgressions and children’s moral and conventional concepts. Developmental Psychology, 24, 352–357. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.24.3.352Google Scholar
Tremblay, R. E. (2010). Developmental origins of disruptive behaviour problems: The “original sin” hypothesis, epigenetics and their consequences for prevention. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 51, 341–367. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02211.xGoogle Scholar
Turiel, E. (1983). The development of social knowledge: Morality and convention. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Turiel, E. (1998). The development of morality. In Damon, W. (Series Ed.) & Eisenberg, N. (Vol. Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3. Social, emotional, and personality development (pp. 863–932). New York: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Turiel, E. (2002). The culture of morality: Social development, context, and conflict. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Turiel, E. (2006). The development of morality. In Damon, W. (Series Ed.) & Eisenberg, N. (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 3: Social, emotional, and personality development (6th ed., pp. 789–857). New York: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Walen, A. (2016). Retributive justice. In Zalta, E. N. (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University.Google Scholar
Whitesell, N. R., & Harter, S. (1996). The interpersonal context of emotion: Anger with close friends and classmates. Child Development, 6, 264–283. doi: 10.2307/1131704Google Scholar
Wong, D. B. (2006). Natural moralities: A defense of pluralistic relativism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yuill, N., & Perner, J. (1988). Intentionality and knowledge in children’s judgments of actor’s responsibility and recipient’s emotional reaction. Developmental Psychology, 24, 358–365. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.24.3.358Google Scholar
Zelazo, P. D., & Carlson, S. M. (2012). Hot and cool executive function in childhood and adolescence: Development and plasticity. Child Development Perspectives, 6, 354–360. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-8606.2012.00246.xGoogle Scholar
Zelazo, P. D., Helwig, C. C., & Lau, A. (1996). Intention, act, and outcome in behavioral prediction and moral judgment. Child Development, 67, 2478–2492. doi: 10.2307/1131635Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×