Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T06:57:22.870Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Fetal karyotyping: what should we be offering and how?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2014

John Crolla
Affiliation:
Salisbury District Hospital
Sean Kehoe
Affiliation:
John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford
Lyn Chitty
Affiliation:
University College Hospital, London
Tessa Homfray
Affiliation:
St George’s University of London
Get access

Summary

Background

Prenatal diagnosis (PND) for fetal chromosome abnormalities (karyotyping) began in the UK in the late 1970s with the introduction of amniocentesis followed by chorionic villus sampling (CVS). Amniotic fluid (AF) and CVS cell culture technologies were adopted by the 23 regional cytogenetic laboratories and the patient ascertainment group was initially restricted exclusively to women with age-related risk of Down syndrome pregnancies. Since then, a PND service has become available in all developed countries. Within the UK, approximately 30000 chromosomal PNDs are performed each year, the vast majority of which are following risk screening protocols and tests defined by the UK National Screening Committee (NSC) policy on Down syndrome screening in pregnancy or, more rarely, because of maternal age alone or maternal anxiety. Following screening, women defined as ‘at risk’ for Down syndrome pregnancies or other trisomies are offered invasive PND and, for the vast majority of women, their AF or CVS samples are sent for karyotyping at the local regional cytogenetic centre.

Although prenatal karyotyping has historically been considered the ‘gold standard’ test following invasive PND, the karyotyping technology has developed very little from that first introduced in the 1970s and, despite some improvements in the recent past, turnaround times in the UK for a prenatal karyotype still remains around 2 weeks for most women and clinicians (Figure 10.1), and these turnaround times show significant interlaboratory variation (Figure 10.2).

Type
Chapter
Information
Reproductive Genetics , pp. 147 - 158
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×