Book contents
Part II - Recollection
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 March 2023
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Representations and Rights of the Environment , pp. 145 - 230Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
References
Akwesasne Notes (ed.) (1978). Basic Call to Consciousness. Summertown, TN: Book Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Declaration of the 10th World Assembly of Religions for Peace, 23 August 2019, Lindau, Germany.Google Scholar
Rankin, D. and Tardif, M.-J. (2020). We Were Called Savages. Vrignon, B. (trans.). Winnipeg: Vidacom [orig. Fr. pub.: D. Rankin and M.-J. Tardif, On nous appelait les sauvages: Souvenirs et espoirs d’un chef héréditaire Algonquin. Montreal: Éditions Le jour, 2011].Google Scholar
Souzenelle, A. de. (2000). Le féminin de l’être: Pour en finir avec la côte d’Adam. Paris: Albin Michel.Google Scholar
Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada (2015). Honouring the Truth, Reconciling for the Future. Toronto: James Lorimer.Google Scholar
Vasantha, Thumbadoo. (2005). Learning from a Kindergarten Dropout: William Commanda – Ojikwanong, Cultural Sharings and Reflections. Kanata: Circle of All Nations.Google Scholar
References
Benedict, XVI (2009). Encyclical Letter Caritas in Veritate (29 June), 67. In Acta Apostolicae Sedis, 101.Google Scholar
Bolivian Bishops’ Conference (2012). Pastoral Letter on the Environment and Human Development in Bolivia. El universo, don de Dios para la vida (23 March), 17.Google Scholar
Congregation for the Doctrine of the faith and Dicastery for Promoting Integral Human Development (2018). Oeconomicae et pecuniariae quaestiones. Considerations for an Ethical Discernment Regarding Some Aspects of the Present Economic–Financial System, 6 January, Rome.Google Scholar
Delville, J.-P. (2015). Introduction. In Pape François, Loué sois-tu! Laudato si’. Namur. Fidélité, 11–14.Google Scholar
Delville, J.-P. (2018). Godefroid de Fontaines (1250–1309), théoricien des idées démocratiques à l’Université de Paris et inspirateur de la Paix de Fexhe. In Masson, Christophe and Demoulin, Bruno (eds.), La Paix de Fexhe (1316) et les révoltes dans la Principauté de Liège et dans les Pays-Bas méridionaux. Brussels: Archives générales du Royaume, Studies in Belgian History, 5, 27–34.Google Scholar
Delville, J.-P. (2020a). Antoine Pottier and the neo-Thomist roots of social justice. In Decock, Wim and Heyrman, Peter (eds.), Neo-Thomism in Action: Law and Society reshaped by Neo-Scholastic Philosophy, 1880–1960. Louvain: Louvain University Press, 279–89.Google Scholar
Delville, J.-P. (2020b). Introduction. In Pape François, Chère Amazonie. Querida Amazonia. Namur. Fidélité, 3–7.Google Scholar
Episcopal Commission for Pastoral Concerns in Argentina (2005). Una tierra para todos.Google Scholar
Francis of Assisi (1999). Canticle of the Creatures. In Armstrong, Regis J. et al. (eds.), Francis of Assisi: Early Documents – The Saint. New York: New City State, vol. I, 113–14.Google Scholar
Francis of Assisi (2003). Canticle of the Sun. In Esser, K. (ed.), François d’Assise, Écrits. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 342–45.Google Scholar
Francis (Pope) (2015). Encyclical letter Laudato si’. French edition: Pape François, Loué sois-tu ! Laudato si’. Introduction: Mgr Jean-Pierre Delville. Namur. Fidélité.Google Scholar
Francis (Pope) (2020). Post-synodal Exhortation Querida Amazonia. French edition: Pape François, Chère Amazonie, Querida Amazonia. Introduction: Mgr Jean-Pierre Delville. Namur. Fidélité.Google Scholar
Guardini, R. (1965). Das Ende der Neuzeit. 9th ed. Würzburg [Eng. ed.: The End of the Modern World, Wilmington, NC: ISI Books].Google Scholar
John Paul, II (1979). Address to Indigenous and rural people, Cuilapán, Mexico (29 January). Acta Apostolicae Sedis 71: 209.Google Scholar
John Paul, II (1981). Encyclical Letter Laborem exercens (14 September). Acta Apostolicae Sedis 73: 626.Google Scholar
John Paul, II (1991). Encyclical Letter Centesimus Annus (1 May 1991). Acta Apostolicae Sedis 83: 831.Google Scholar
John Paul, II (2000). Catechesis (2 August 2000). 4. In Insegnamenti 23/2 (2000), 112.Google Scholar
Paraguayan Bishops’ Conference (1983). Pastoral Letter El campesino paraguayo y la tierra (12 June 1983), 2, 4.Google Scholar
Paul, VI (1976). Message for the 1977 World Day of Peace. Acta Apostolicae Sedis 68: 709.Google Scholar
Second Vatican Ecumenical Council (1965). Pastoral Constitution on the Church in the Modern World Gaudium et spes. Rome, 7 December 1965.Google Scholar
Synod of Bishops (2019). Special assembly of the Synod for the Pan-Amazon Region. Rome. 26 October. Final document. The Amazon: New Paths for the Church and for an Integral Ecology. www.vatican.va/roman_curia/synod/documents/rc_synod_doc_20191026_sinodo-amazzonia_en.html.Google Scholar
References
Cayla, O. and Halpérin, J. L. (eds.) (2008). Dictionnaire des grandes œuvres juridiques. Paris: Dalloz.Google Scholar
Cornu, G. (1987). Vocabulaire juridique. Paris: Presses universitaires de France [10th ed., 2014].Google Scholar
Ernout, A. and Meillet, A. (1951). Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue latine. Paris: Klincksiek [4th ed., 2001, reissued, with additions and corrections by Jacques André].Google Scholar
Gaius (1965). Institutes. Julien Reinach (trans.). Paris: collection des universités de France.Google Scholar
Giangrieco Pessi, M. V. (1997). L’interpretazione prudentium nell’evoluzione dell’actio de pauperie: res mancipi e res nec mancipi, Ricerche dedicate al professor Filippo Gallo. Naples: Jovene, 1: 285–300.Google Scholar
Girard, P. F. and Senn, F. (1967, 1977). Textes de droit romain. 7th ed. by a team de Romanistes, 1967, I: Commentaires; Paris, 1977, II: Les lois des Romains, Naples: Jovene.Google Scholar
Goujard, R. (1975). Caton l’Ancien. De l’agriculture. Raoul Goujard (trans.). Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Guillaumin, J. Y. (2010). Les arpenteurs romains. II Hygin – Siculus Flaccus. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Halpérin, J. L. (2010). Propriété et droit subjectif: Deux destins liés? Conférence faite au Japon aux Université Nanzan et KeioHAL, halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00460386/documentGoogle Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. (1940). Principes de la philosophie du droit. André Kaan (trans.), preface by Jean Hippolyte. Paris: Gallimard [orig. pub. Berlin, 1821].Google Scholar
Hermitte, M.-A. (1988). Le corps hors du commerce hors du marché. Archives de philosophie du droit 33: 323–46.Google Scholar
Hermitte, M.-A. (2011). La nature, sujet de droit? Annales: Histoire, Sciences Sociales 66(1): 173–212.Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. (1921). Leviathan ou la matière, la forme et la puissance d’un état ecclésiastique et civil. Traduction française en partie double d’après les textes anglais et latins originaux par Raoul Anthony, I: De l’homme. Paris: Marcel Giard.Google Scholar
Kant, E. (1979). Métaphysique des mœurs: Première partie. Doctrine du droit. Preface by M. Villey. A. Philonenko (trans.). Paris: Librairie philosophique J. Vrin.Google Scholar
Krüger, P. (1970). Code de Justinien, Corpus Iuris Civilis II. 15th ed. Berlin: Weidmann.Google Scholar
Lindsay, W. M. (1965). Sexti Pompei Festi, De verborum significatu cum Pauli epitome. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Littré, E. (1968). Dictionnaire de la langue française, I. Monte Carlo: Editions du Cap.Google Scholar
Mannino, V. (2014). Le ‘bien commun’: La fausse impasse du droit romain. In Parange, B. and De Saint Victor, J. (eds.), Repenser les biens communs. Paris: CNRS éditions, 35–50.Google Scholar
Meyer, C. (2006). Le système doctrinal des aliments: Contribution à la théorie générale de l’obligation alimentaire légale. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Mommsen, Theodor and Paul, Krüger (1973). Corpus Iuris Civilis I. 22nd ed. Berlin: Weidmann.Google Scholar
Occam, G. d’. (1970). Opera philosophica et theologica. Boehner, P, Gal, G. and Brown, S. (eds.). New York: St Bonaventure.Google Scholar
Occam, G. (d’) (1940, 1956, 1963). Opera politica. Sikes, J. G. and Offler, H. S. (eds.). Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Paturet, A. (2010). L’individu entre l’homme et la chose: Note sur l’esclave en droit romain. Droits 1(51): 3–26.Google Scholar
Paturet, A. (2017). The intriguing fate of the Roman res: From case and trial to modern times in proceedings of the eleventh conference on legal translation. Comparative Legilinguistics 30: 67–83.Google Scholar
Piron, S. (2008). Congé à Villey. L’atelier du Centre de recherches historiques 1, http://acrh.revues.org/314Google Scholar
Rampelberg, R. M. (2005). Repères romains pour le droit européen des contrats. Paris: LGDJ.Google Scholar
Regad, C., Riot, C. and Schmit, S. (2018). La personnalité juridique de l’animal. Paris: LexisNexis.Google Scholar
Thomas, Y. (1978). Le droit entre les mots et les choses: Rhétorique et jurisprudence à Rome. Archives de philosophie du droit 23: 93–114.Google Scholar
Thomas, Y. (1980). Res, chose et patrimoine (note sur le rapport sujet–objet en droit romain). Archives de philosophie du droit 25: 413–26.Google Scholar
Thomas, Y. (1991). Imago naturae. Note sur l’institutionnalité de la nature à Rome, Théologie et droit dans la science politique de l’Etat moderne. Rome: éd. EFR no. 147: 201–27.Google Scholar
Thomas, Y. (1998). Le sujet de droit, la personne et la nature, sur la critique contemporaine du sujet de droit. Le débat 3(100): 85–107.Google Scholar
Thompson, D. (1993). The Oxford Dictionary of Current English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Vanuxem, S. (2010). Les choses saisies par la propriété. De la chose-objet aux choses-milieux. Revue interdisciplinaire d’études juridiques 64(1): 123–82.Google Scholar
Villey, M. (1964). La genèse du droit subjectif chez Guillaume d’Occam. Archives de philosophie du droit 9: 99–127.Google Scholar
References
Biber, D. (1993). Representativeness in corpus design. Literary and Linguistic Computing 8(4): 243–57.Google Scholar
Brunner, O., Conze, W. and Koselleck, R. (eds.) (2004). Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe. Historisches Lexikon zur Politisch-sozialen Sprache in Deutschland. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 9 vols.Google Scholar
Butt, D., Fahey, R., Feez, S., Spinks, S. and Yallop, C. (eds.) (2000). Using Functional Grammar. An Explorer’s Guide. Sydney: Macquarie University.Google Scholar
Dan Tarlock, A. (2003–04). Is there a there there in environmental law? Journal of Land Use and Environmental Law 19(2): 213–54.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. (1999). Linguistic and intertextual analysis within discourse analysis. In Jaworski, A. and Coupland, N. (eds.), The Discourse Reader. London: Routledge, 183–211.Google Scholar
Felber, H. (2001). Allgemeine Terminologielehre, Wissenslehre und Wissenstechnik. Theoretische Grundlagen und philosophische Betrachtungen. Wien: Termnet.Google Scholar
Fowler, R., Hodge, B., Kress, G and Trew, T. (1979). Language and Control. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. (1985/1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Higgins, P., Short, D. and South, N (2013). Protecting the planet: A proposal for a law of ecocide. Crime Law Social Change 59: 257.Google Scholar
van Hoecke, M. and Warrington, M. (2010). Legal Cultures, Legal Paradigms and Legal Doctrine: Towards a New Model for Comparative Law. First published 1998, reprinted in Del Mar, M., Twinning, W. and Giudice, M. (eds.), Legal Theory and the Legal Academy, Library of Essays in Contemporary Legal Theory, vol. III. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, 291–332.Google Scholar
Hohfeld, W. N. (1913–14). Some fundamental legal conceptions as applied in judicial reasoning. Yale Law Journal 23: 16–59.Google Scholar
Koselleck, K. (1979). Begriffsgeschichte und Sozialgeschichte, in: Vergangene Zukunft. Zur Semantik geschichtlicher Zeiten. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Laske, C. (2013). Translators and legal comparatists as objective mediators. In Husa, J. and van Hoecke, M (eds.), Objectivity in Law and Legal Reasoning. Oxford: Hart, 213–28.Google Scholar
Laske, C (2020). Law, Language and Change. A Diachronic Semantic Analysis of Consideration in the Common Law. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Mattila, H. (2012). Legal vocabulary. In Tiersma, P. and Solan, L. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Language and Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 27–51.Google Scholar
Mattila, H. (2013). Comparative Legal Linguistics, Language of Law, Latin and Modern Lingua Francas. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
O’Halloran, K. (2011). Critical discourse analysis. In Simpson, J. (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Applied Linguistics. London: Routledge, 109–25.Google Scholar
Reichardt, R., Schmitt, E., Lüsebrink, H. J. and Leonard, J. (1985–). Handbuch politisch-sozialer Grundbegriffe in Frankreich 1680–1820. Munich: Oldenbourg Wissenschaftverlag.Google Scholar
Ritter, J., Gründer, K. and Gabriel, G. (eds.) (1971–2007). Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie. Basel: Schwabe.Google Scholar
Stoett, P. (2000). Human and Global Security: An Exploration of Terms. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar