Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory: a critique from cognitive science

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511819384.018

17 - Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory: a critique from cognitive science

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 31 January 2011

Gerald Matthews

Edited by

Philip J. Corr

Show author details

Gerald Matthews: Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Psychology University of Cincinnati, USA
Philip J. Corr: Affiliation:
University of Wales, Swansea

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory (RST) draws on forty years of research conducted by Jeffrey Gray, and now incorporates significant modifications introduced by Philip Corr, Alan Pickering, Neil McNaughton and others (see Corr 2004; McNaughton and Corr 2004). RST is now a highly visible feature of the panorama of models of human personality. The purpose of this chapter is to provide a critique of the theory, from a cognitive science standpoint. RST is an ambitious, multifaceted account of the biological bases of personality, comprising several ‘theories within a theory’. Table 17.1 discriminates the logically distinct facets of RST, whose validity may be separately evaluated, as follows.

First, there is an epistemological facet. RST is based on animal models of emotion and motivation (McNaughton and Gray 2000); one may question whether such models are valid for understanding human personality. Secondly, there is a neurophysiological facet. RST sets out a ‘conceptual nervous system’ or a specification of discrete brain systems that influence personality. Figure 17.1 illustrates the three fundamental systems specified by the latest, modified version of RST (Corr 2004). The Fight-Flight-Freeze System (FFFS) mediates reactions to all aversive stimuli, including both conditioned and unconditioned stimuli. It relates to fear, but not anxiety. The behavioral activation system (BAS) mediates reactions to conditioned and unconditioned appetitive stimuli. In the current theory, the behavioral inhibition system (BIS) is activated by goal conflict, typically when the organism faces an approach-avoidance conflict associated with concurrent activation of the FFFS and BAS. Its activation corresponds to anxiety and worry, but not fear.

Type: Chapter
Information: The Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory of Personality , pp. 482 - 507

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511819384.018 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Averill, J. R. (1980), A constructivist view of emotion in , R. Plutchik and , H. Kellerman (eds), Emotion: Theory, Research and Experience, vol. 1, Theories of Emotion (San Diego: Academic Press), pp. 305–339Google Scholar

Barr, R. F. and McConaghy, N. (1974), Anxiety in relation to conditioning, Behaviour Therapy and Research, 5, 193–202CrossRef Google Scholar

Calvo, M. G. and Castillo, M. D. (2001), Bias in predictive inferences during reading, Discourse Processes, 32, 43–71CrossRef Google Scholar

Clark, D. M. (1996), Panic disorder: from theory to therapy in , P. M. Salkovskis (ed.), Frontiers of Cognitive Therapy (New York: Guilford Press), pp. 318–344Google Scholar

Clore, G. L. and Ortony, A. (2000), Cognition in emotion: sometimes, always, or never? in , R. D. Lane and , L. Nadel (eds), Cognitive Neuroscience of Emotion (New York: Oxford University Press), pp. 24–61Google Scholar

Corr, P. J. (2002), J. A. Gray's reinforcement sensitivity theory: tests of the joint subsystem hypothesis of anxiety and impulsivity, Personality and Individual Differences, 33, 511–532CrossRef Google Scholar

Corr, P. J.(2004), Reinforcement sensitivity theory and personality, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 28, 317–332CrossRef Google Scholar

Corr, P. J., Pickering, A. D. and Gray, J. A. (1995), Personality and reinforcement in associative and instrumental learning, Personality and Individual Differences, 19, 47–72CrossRef Google Scholar

Corr, P. J., Pickering, A. D. and Gray, J. A.(1997), Personality, punishment, and procedural learning: a test of J. A. Gray's anxiety theory, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 337–344CrossRef Google Scholar

Deci, E. L. and Ryan, R. M. (2000), The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior, Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268CrossRef Google Scholar

Derryberry, D. and Reed, M. A. (1997), Motivational and attentional components of personality in , G. Matthews (ed.), Cognitive Science Perspectives on Personality and Emotion (Amsterdam: Elsevier), pp. 443–473Google Scholar

Ekman, P. (1999), Basic emotions in , T. Dalgleish and , M. J. Power (eds), Handbook of Cognition and Emotion (New York: Wiley), pp. 45–60Google Scholar

Eysenck, H. J. (1981), General features of the model in , H. J. Eysenck (ed.), A Model for Personality (New York: Springer-Verlag), pp. 1–37Google Scholar

Eysenck, H. J. and Eysenck, M. W. (1985), Personality and Individual Differences (New York: Plenum)CrossRef Google Scholar

Fox, E., Russo, R., Bowles, R. and Dutton, K. (2001), Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in subclinical anxiety?, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 681–700CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Gray, J. A. (1991), Neural systems, emotion and personality in Madden, J. IV (ed.), Neurobiology of Learning, Emotion and Affect (New York: Raven Press), pp. 273–306Google Scholar

Gray, J. A. and McNaughton, N. (2000), The Neuropsychology of Anxiety: an Enquiry into the Functions of the Septo-hippocampal System (2nd edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Gupta, S. (1990), Impulsivity/sociability and reinforcement in verbal operant conditioning: a replication, Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 585–590CrossRef Google Scholar

Hagekull, B. and Bohlin, G. (2003), Early temperament and attachment as predictors of the five factor model of personality, Attachment and Human Development, 5, 2–18CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Heponiemi, T., Keltikangas-Järvinen, L., Kettunen, J., Puttonen, S. and Ravaja, N. (2004), Behavioural Inhibition System-Behavioural Approach System sensitivity and cardiac autonomic stress profiles, Psychophysiology, 41, 37–45CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Heubeck, B. G., Wilkinson, R. B. and Cologon, J. (1998), A second look at Carver and White's (1994) Behavioural Inhibition System/Behavioural Approach System scales, Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 785–800CrossRef Google Scholar

Hockey, G. R. J. (1984), Varieties of attentional state: the effects of the environment in , R. Parasuraman and , D. R. Davies (eds), Varieties of Attention (New York: Academic), pp. 156–189Google Scholar

Johnson, E. J. and Tversky, A. (1984), Representations of perceptions of risks, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, pp. 20–31Google Scholar

Knyazev, G. G., Slobodskaya, H. R. and Wilson, G. D. (2004), Comparison of the construct validity of the Gray-Wilson Personality Questionnaire and the Behavioural Inhibition System/Behavioural Approach System scales, Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 1565–1582CrossRef Google Scholar

Larsen, R. J. and Ketelaar, T. (1991), Personality and susceptibility to positive and negative emotional states, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 132–140CrossRef Google Scholar

Lazarus, R. S. (1991), Emotion and Adaptation (Oxford: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Lazarus, R. S.(1999), Stress and Emotion: a New Synthesis (New York: Springer)Google Scholar

LeDoux, J. E. (1998), The Emotional Brain: the Mysterious Underpinnings of Emotional Life (London: Phoenix)Google Scholar

Levey, A. B. and Martin, I. (1981), Personality and conditioning in , H. J. Eysenck (ed.), A Model for Personality (Berlin: Springer), pp. 123–168Google Scholar

Matthews, G. (1997), Extraversion, emotion and performance: a cognitive-adaptive model in , G. Matthews (ed.), Cognitive Science Perspectives on Personality and Emotion (Amsterdam: Elsevier), pp. 339–442Google Scholar

Matthews, G.(2000), A cognitive science critique of biological theories of personality traits, History and Philosophy of Psychology, 2, 1–17Google Scholar

Matthews, G. (2004), Neuroticism from the top down: psychophysiology and negative emotionality in Stelmack, R. (ed.), On the Psychobiology of Personality: Essays in Honor of Marvin Zuckerman (Amsterdam: Elsevier Science), pp. 249–266Google Scholar

Matthews, G., Campbell, S. E., Falconer, S., Joyner, L., Huggins, J., Gilliland, K., Grier, R. and Warm, J. S. (2002), Fundamental dimensions of subjective state in performance settings: task engagement, distress and worry, Emotion, 2, 315–340CrossRef Google Scholar

Matthews, G., Deary, I. J. and Whiteman, M. C. (2003), Personality Traits (2nd edn, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)CrossRef Google Scholar

Matthews, G., Derryberry, D. and Siegle, G. J. (2000), Personality and emotion: cognitive science perspectives in , S. E. Hampson (ed.), Advances in Personality Psychology (London: Routledge), vol. 1, pp. 199–237Google Scholar

Matthews, G., Emo, A. K., Funke, G., Zeidner, M., Roberts, R. D., Costa, P. T. Jr and Schulze, R. (2006), Emotional intelligence, personality, and task-induced stress, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 12, 96–107Google Scholar PubMed

Matthews, G. and Gilliland, K. (1999), The personality theories of H. J. Eysenck and J. A. Gray: a comparative review, Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 583–626CrossRef Google Scholar

Matthews, G. and Harley, T. A. (1993), Effects of extraversion and self-report arousal on semantic priming: a connectionist approach, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 735–756CrossRef Google Scholar

Matthews, G., Hillyard, E. J. and Campbell, S. E. (1999), Metacognition and maladaptive coping as components of test anxiety, Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 6, 111–1253.0.CO;2-4>CrossRef Google Scholar

Matthews, G., Jones, D. M. and Chamberlain, A. G. (1990), Refining the measurement of mood: the UWIST mood adjective checklist, British Journal of Psychology, 81, 17–42CrossRef Google Scholar

Matthews, G., Schwean, V. L., Campbell, S. E., Saklofske, D. H. and Mohamed A. A. R. (2000), Personality, self-regulation and adaptation: a cognitive-social framework in Boekarts, M., , P. R. Pintrich and , M. Zeidner (eds), Handbook of Self-regulation (New York: Academic), pp. 171–207Google Scholar

Matthews, G. and Zeidner, M. (2004), Traits, states and the trilogy of mind: an adaptive perspective on intellectual functioning in Dai, D. and Sternberg, R. J. (eds), Motivation, Emotion, and Cognition: Integrative Perspectives on Intellectual Functioning and Development (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum), pp. 143–174Google Scholar

McNaughton, N. and Corr, P. J. (2004), A two-dimensional neuropsychology of defense: fear/anxiety and defensive distance, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 28, 285–305CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

McNaughton, N. and Gray, A. (2000), Anxiolytic action on the behavioural inhibition system implies multiple types of arousal contribute to anxiety, Journal of Affective Disorders, 61, 161–176CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Morrone-Strupinsky, J. V. and Depue, R. A. (2004), Differential relation of two distinct, film-induced positive emotional states to affiliative and agentic extraversion, Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 1109–1126CrossRef Google Scholar

Newell, A. (1982), The knowledge level, Artificial Intelligence, 18, 87–127CrossRef Google Scholar

Panksepp, J. (1998), Affective Neuroscience: the Foundations of Human and Animal Emotions (New York: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1999), What's in your mind? in Lepore, E. and Pylyshyn, Z. W. (eds), What is Cognitive Science? (Malden, MA: Blackwell), pp. 1–25Google Scholar

Rolls, E. T. (1999), The Brain and Emotion (New York: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Rusting, C. L. and Larsen, R. J. (1997), Extraversion, neuroticism, and susceptibility to positive and negative affect: a test of two theoretical models, Personality and Individual Differences, 22, 607–612CrossRef Google Scholar

Schmidt, N. B., Lerew, D. R. and Jackson, R. J. (1999), Prospective evaluation of anxiety sensitivity in the pathogenesis of panic: replication and extension, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 108, 532–537CrossRef Google Scholar

Smith, B. D., Davidson, R. A., Smith, D. L., Goldstein, H. and Perlstein, W. (1989), Sensation seeking and arousal: effects of strong stimulation on electrodermal activation and memory task performance, Personality and Individual Differences, 10, 671–679CrossRef Google Scholar

Spence, K. W. (1964), Anxiety (drive) level and performance in eyelid conditioning, Psychological Bulletin, 61, 129–139CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Thayer, R. E. (1989), The Biopsychology of Mood and Arousal (Oxford: Oxford University Press)Google Scholar

Watson, D. (2000), Mood and Temperament (New York: Guilford Press)Google Scholar

Wells, A. (2000), Emotional Disorders and Metacognition: Innovative Cognitive Therapy (Chichester: Wiley)Google Scholar

Wells, A. and Matthews, G. (1994), Attention and Emotion: a Clinical Perspective (Hove: Erlbaum)Google Scholar

Wells, A. and Matthews, G. (2005), Cognitive vulnerability to anxiety disorders: an integration in Alloy, L. B. and Riskind, J. H. (eds), Cognitive Vulnerability to Emotional Disorders (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum), pp. 303–325Google Scholar

Whiteside, S. P. and Lynam, D. (2001), The Five Factor Model and Impulsivity: using a Structural Model of Personality to Understand Impulsivity, Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 669–689CrossRef Google Scholar

Wilson, G. D., Barrett, P. T. and Gray, J. A. (1989), Human reactions to reward and punishment: a questionnaire examination of Gray's personality theory, British Journal of Psychology, 80, 509–515CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Zeidner, M. and Matthews, G. (2005), Evaluation anxiety in Elliot, A. J. and Dweck, C. S. (eds), Handbook of Competence and Motivation (New York: Guilford Press), pp. 141–163Google Scholar

Zinbarg, R. and Revelle, W. (1989), Personality and conditioning: a test of four models, Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 301–314CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Zuckerman, M. (1991), Psychobiology of Personality (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar