Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T14:36:55.694Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part I - Overviews

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 January 2024

Edited by
Eva Witesman  and
Curtis Child
Eva Witesman
Affiliation:
Brigham Young University, Utah
Curtis Child
Affiliation:
Brigham Young University, Utah
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Reimagining Nonprofits
Sector Theory in the Twenty-First Century
 , pp. 15 - 88
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2024

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Anheier, H. K. (2005). Nonprofit organizations: Theory, management, policy. Routledge.Google Scholar
Arrow, K. J. (1963). Uncertainty and the welfare economics of medical care. The American Economic Review, 53(5), 941–973.Google Scholar
Barman, E. (2013). Classificatory struggles in the nonprofit sector: The formation of the national taxonomy of exempt entities, 1969–1987. Social Science History, 37(1), 103–141.Google Scholar
Bator, F. M. (1958). The anatomy of market failure. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 72(3), 351–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, P. L., & Neuhaus, R. J. (1977). To empower people: The role of mediating structures in public policy. American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.Google Scholar
Clemens, E. S. (2006). The constitution of citizens: Political theories of nonprofit organizations. In Powell, W. W. & Steinberg, R. (Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (2nd ed., pp. 207–220). Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Coase, R. H. (1990). The firm, the market, and the law. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Commission on Private Philanthropy and Public Needs. (1975). Giving in America: Toward a stronger voluntary sector.Google Scholar
Douglas, J. (1987). Political theories of nonprofit organization. In Powell, W. W. (Ed.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (1st ed., pp. 43–54). Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, B., & Foley, M. W. (2001). Civil society and social capital. In Edwards, B., Foley, M. W., & Diani, M. (Eds.), Beyond Tocqueville: Civil society and the social capital debate in comparative perspective (pp. 1–14). Tufts University.Google Scholar
Fram, E. H., & Withers, J. (1999). Conflict of interest in the board room? New research points the way to solutions. Nonprofit World, 17(2), 19–21.Google Scholar
Frumkin, P. (2005). On being nonprofit: A conceptual and policy primer. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Fung, A. (2003). Associations and democracy: Between theories, hopes, and realities. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 515–539.Google Scholar
Hall, P. D. (1992). Inventing the nonprofit sector and other essays on philanthropy, voluntarism, and nonprofit organizations. Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Handy, F., Seto, S., Wakaruk, A., Mersey, B., Mejia, A., & Copeland, L. (2010). The discerning consumer: Is nonprofit status a factor? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39(5), 866–883.Google Scholar
Hansmann, H. B. (1980). The role of nonprofit enterprise. The Yale Law Journal, 89(5), 835–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansmann, H. B. (1981a). Consumer perceptions of nonprofit enterprise: Reply. The Yale Law Journal, 90(7), 1633–1638.Google Scholar
Hansmann, H. B. (1981b). The rationale for exempting nonprofit organizations from corporate income taxation. Yale Law Journal, 91(1), 54–100.Google Scholar
Hansmann, H. B. (1987). Economic theories of nonprofit organization. In Powell, W. W. (Ed.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 27–42). Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hodgkinson, V., & Painter, A. (2003). Third sector research in international perspective: The role of ISTR. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 14(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
James, E. (1987). The nonprofit sector in comparative perspective. In Powell, W. W. (Ed.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (pp. 397–415). Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lechterman, T., & Reich, R. (2020). Political theory and the nonprofit sector. In Powell, W. W. & Bromley, P. (Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (3rd ed., pp. 171–191). Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lohmann, R. A. (1989). And lettuce is nonanimal: Toward a positive economics of voluntary action. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 18(4), 367–383.Google Scholar
Lohmann, R. A. (1992a). The commons: A multidisciplinary approach to nonprofit organization, voluntary action, and philanthropy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 21(3), 309–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lohmann, R. A. (1992b). The commons: New perspectives on nonprofit organization, voluntary action and philanthropy. Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Lohmann, R. A. (2016). The Ostroms’ commons revisited. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45(4), 27S–42S.Google Scholar
Mirabella, R. M. (2007). University-based educational programs in nonprofit management and philanthropic studies: A 10-year review and projections of future trends [10.1177/0899764007305051]. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36, 11S–27S. http://nvs.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1177/0899764007305051Google Scholar
Mirabella, R. M., Hoffman, T., Teo, T. K., & McDonald, M. (2019). The evolution of nonprofit management and philanthropic studies in the United States: Are we now a disciplinary field? Journal of Nonprofit Education and Leadership, 9(1), 63–84.Google Scholar
Ott, J. S., & Dicke, L. A. (Eds.). (2015). The nature of the nonprofit sector (3rd ed.). Westview Press.Google Scholar
Powell, W. W., & Bromley, P. (2020). The nonprofit sector: A research handbook. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Powell, W. W., & Steinberg, R. (2006). The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (2nd ed.). Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. D., Leonardi, R., & Nanetti, R. Y. (1992). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Salamon, L. M. (1987). Of market failure, voluntary failure, and third-party government: Toward a theory of government-nonprofit relationship in the modern welfare state. Journal of Voluntary Action Research, 16, 30–48.Google Scholar
Salamon, L. M. (1995). Partners in public service: Government-nonprofit relations in the modern welfare state. Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Salamon, L. M. (Ed.). (2002). The tools of government: A guide to the new governance. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Salamon, L. M., & Anheier, H. K. (1998). Social origins of civil society: Exploring the nonprofit sector cross-nationally. Voluntas, 9, 213–248.Google Scholar
Salamon, L. M., Sokolowski, S. W., & Haddock, M. A. (2017). Explaining civil society development: A social origins approach. Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, D. H. (1999). Researching volunteer associations and other nonprofits: An emergent interdisciplinary field and possible new discipline. The American Sociologist, 30(4), 5–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, D. H. (2003). A history of ARNOVA [10.1177/0899764003254841]. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 32(3), 458–472. http://nvs.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/32/3/458Google Scholar
Smith, D. H. (2013). Growth of research associations and journals in the emerging discipline of altruistics. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 42(4), 638–656.Google Scholar
Smith, D. H. (2016). A survey of voluntaristics: Research on the growth of the global, interdisciplinary, socio-behavioral science field and emergent inter-discipline. Voluntaristics Review, 1(2), 1–81.Google Scholar
Steinberg, R. (2006). Economic theories of nonprofit organizations. In Powell, W. W. & Steinberg, R. (Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (2nd ed., pp. 117–139). Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, A. de (2004). Democracy in America (A. Goldhammer, Trans.). Library of America.Google Scholar
Villa, D. (2006). Tocqueville and civil society. In Welch, C. B. (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to Tocqueville (pp. 216–244). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weisbrod, B. A. (1972). Toward a theory of the voluntary non-profit sector in a three-sector economy. Conference on Altruism and Economic Theory, New York.Google Scholar
Weisbrod, B. A. (1977). The voluntary nonprofit sector: An economic analysis. Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E. (1981). The economics of organization: The transaction cost approach. The American Journal of Sociology, 87(3), 548–577.Google Scholar
Young, D. R. (1981). Entrepreneurship and the behavior of nonprofit organizations: Elements of a theory. In White, M. J. & Peterson, G. E. (Eds.), Nonprofit firms in a three sector economy (Vol. 6, pp. 135–162). Urban Institute.Google Scholar
Young, D. R. (1983). If not for profit, for what? A behavioral theory of the nonprofit sector based on entrepreneurship. Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Young, D. R. (2000). Alternative models of government–nonprofit sector relations: Theoretical and international perspectives. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(1), 149–172.Google Scholar
Young, D. R. (2013). If not for profit, for what? Originally published by Lexington Books (now open access). http://scholarworks.gsu.edu/facbooks2013/1Google Scholar

References

Allison, L., Chen, X., Flanigan, S. T., Keyes-Williams, J., Vasavada, T. S., & Saidel, J. R. (2007). Toward doctoral education in nonprofit and philanthropic studies. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(4_suppl), 51S–63S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764007305054CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anheier, H. K. (2006). Nonprofit sector in comparative perspective. In Powell, W. W. & Anheier, H. K. (Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (2nd ed.) (pp. 89–114). Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Anheier, H. K., & Ben-Ner, A. (2003). The study of nonprofit enterprise: Theories and approaches. Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
Auerbach, C., & Silverstein, L. B. (2003). Qualitative data: An introduction to coding and analysis. New York University Press.Google Scholar
Badelt, C. (1990). Institutional choice and organizational behavior in the third sector. In Anheier, H. K. & Seibel, W. (Eds.), The third sector: Comparative studies of nonprofit organizations. De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110868401Google Scholar
Badelt, C. (1997). Entrepreneurship theories of the non-profit sector. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 8(2), 162–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02354193Google Scholar
Bator, F. M. (1958). The anatomy of market failure. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 72(3), 351–379. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882231Google Scholar
Ben-Ner, A. (1986). Nonprofit organizations: Why do they exist in market economies? The Economics of Nonprofit Institutions: Studies in Structure and Policy, 1, 94–113.Google Scholar
Ben-Ner, A. (2002). The shifting boundaries of the mixed economy and the future of the nonprofit sector. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 73(1), 5–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8292.00184Google Scholar
Ben-Ner, A., & Gui, B. (2003). The theory of nonprofit organizations revisited. In Anheier, H. K. & Ben-Ner, A. (Eds.), The study of the nonprofit enterprise: Theories and approaches (pp. 3–26). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0131-2_1Google Scholar
Ben-Ner, A., & Van Hoomissen, T. (1991). Nonprofit organizations in the mixed economy. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 62(4), 519–550. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8292.1991.tb01366.xGoogle Scholar
Berger, P., & Neuhaus, R. (2021). To empower people: The role of mediating structures in public policy. In Ott, J. S. & Dicke, L. A. (Eds.), The nature of the nonprofit sector (4th ed.) (pp. 350–361). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367696559-32Google Scholar
Berry, J. M. (2003). A voice for nonprofits. Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Blumer, H. (1954). What is wrong with social theory? American Sociological Review, 19(1), 3–10. JSTOR. https://doi.org/10.2307/2088165Google Scholar
Bode, I. (2006). Disorganized welfare mixes: Voluntary agencies and new governance regimes in Western Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 16(4), 346–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928706068273Google Scholar
Boschee, J. (2001). Eight basic principles for nonprofit entrepreneurs. Nonprofit World, 19(4), 15–18.Google Scholar
Brinkerhoff, J. M. (2002). Government–nonprofit partnership: A defining framework. Public Administration and Development, 22(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.203Google Scholar
Brudney, J. L., & Durden, T. K. (1993). Twenty years of the Journal of Voluntary Action Research/Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly: An assessment of past trends and future directions. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 22(3), 207–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764093223004Google Scholar
Bushouse, B. K., & Sowa, J. E. (2012). Producing knowledge for practice: Assessing NVSQ 2000–2010. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 41(3), 497–513. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764011422116Google Scholar
Chaves, M. (1998). The religious ethic and the spirit of nonprofit entrepreneurship. In Powell, W. W. & Clemens, E. S. (Eds.), Private action and the public good. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Clemens, E. S. (2006). Constitution of citizens: Political theories of nonprofit organizations. In Powell, W. W. & Steinberg, R. (Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (2nd ed.) (pp. 207–220). Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Clemens, E. S. (2016). The constitution of citizens: Political theories of nonprofit organizations. In Ott, J. S. & Dicke, L. A. (Eds.), The nature of the nonprofit sector (pp. 261–275). Routledge.Google Scholar
Cordes, J. J., Steuerle, C. E., & Twombly, E. (2004). Dimensions of nonprofit entrepreneurship: An exploratory essay. In D. Holtz-Eakin & H.S. Rosen (Eds.). Public Policy and the Economics of Entrepreneurship (pp. 115–148). MIT Press.Google Scholar
Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2011). Building theory about theory building: What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 12–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0486Google Scholar
Coston, J. M. (1998). A model and typology of government–NGO relationships. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 27(3), 358–382. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764098273006Google Scholar
Darden, L., & Maull, N. (1977). Interfield theories. Philosophy of Science, 44(1), 43–64. https://doi.org/10.1086/288723Google Scholar
de Tocqueville, A. (1988). Democracy in America: And two essays on America. Penguin UK.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, P. J. (1995). Comments on “What theory is not.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(3), 391–397. JSTOR. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393790Google Scholar
DiMaggio, P. J., & Anheier, H. K. (1990). The sociology of nonprofit organizations and sectors. Annual Review of Sociology, 16, 137–159. www.jstor.org/stable/2393790Google Scholar
Douglas, J. (1987). Political theories of nonprofit organization. In Powell, W. W. & Steinberg, R. (Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (1st ed.) (Vol. 43, p. 45). Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, B., & Foley, M. W. (1998). Civil society and social capital beyond Putnam. American Behavioral Scientist, 42(1), 124–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642980420010Google Scholar
Edwards, B., & Foley, M. W. (2001). Civil society and social capital: A primer. In Beyond Tocqueville: Civil society and the social capital debate in comparative perspective (pp. 1–14). University Press of New England Hanover.Google Scholar
Eikenberry, A. M. (2009). Refusing the market: A democratic discourse for voluntary and nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38(4), 582–596. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764009333686Google Scholar
Eikenberry, A. M., & Kluver, J. D. (2004). The marketization of the nonprofit sector: Civil society at risk? Public Administration Review, 64(2), 132–140. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00355.xGoogle Scholar
Elsevier. (2021). About Scopus – Abstract and citation database. Scopus. www.elsevier.com/solutions/scopusGoogle Scholar
Froelich, K. A., & Knoepfle, T. W. (1996). Internal Revenue Service 990 data: Fact or fiction? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 25(1), 40–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764096251004Google Scholar
Froelich, K. A., Knoepfle, T. W., & Pollak, T. H. (2000). Financial measures in nonprofit organization research: Comparing IRS 990 return and audited financial statement data. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(2), 232–254. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764000292002Google Scholar
Glaeser, E. L., & Shleifer, A. (2001). Not-for-profit entrepreneurs. Journal of Public Economics, 81(1), 99–115. doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(00)00130-4Google Scholar
Gordon, T., Khumawala, S. B., Kraut, M. A., & Meade, J. A. (2007). The quality and reliability of Form 990 data: Are users being misled? Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal; Arden, 11, 27.Google Scholar
Grønbjerg, K. A. (2016). Changing shape of government-nonprofit relations. In Ott, J. S. & Dicke, L. A. (Eds.), Nature of the nonprofit sector (pp. 235–237). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367696559-22Google Scholar
Handy, F. (1997). Coexistence of nonprofit, for-profit and public sector institutions. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 68(2), 201–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8292.00043Google Scholar
Hansmann, H. (1979). The role of nonprofit enterprise. Yale Law Journal, 89(5), 835–902.Google Scholar
Hansmann, H. (1981). The rationale for exempting nonprofit organizations from corporate income taxation. Yale Law Journal, 91(1), 54–101.Google Scholar
Hansmann, H. (2003). The role of trust in nonprofit enterprise. In Anheier, H. K. & Ben-Ner, A. (Eds.), The study of the nonprofit enterprise: Theories and approaches (pp. 115–122). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0131-2_6Google Scholar
Hügel, S. (2020). PyZotero (1.4.10). http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2917290Google Scholar
Jackson, S. K., Guerrero, S., & Appe, S. (2014). The state of nonprofit and philanthropic studies doctoral education. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(5), 795–811. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764014549056Google Scholar
James, E. (1987). Nonprofit sector in comparative perspective. In Powell, W. & Steinberg, R. (Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (1st ed.) (Vol. 43, p. 45). Yale University Press.Google Scholar
James, E. (1989). The nonprofit sector in international perspective: Studies in comparative culture and policy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
James, E. (1990). Economic theories of the nonprofit sector: A comparative perspective. In Anheier, H. K. & Seibel, W. (Eds.), The third sector: Comparative studies of nonprofit organizations. De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110868401.21Google Scholar
James, E., & Rose-Ackerman, S. (2013). The non-profit enterprise in market economics. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315015163Google Scholar
Kamerāde, D., Crotty, J., & Ljubownikow, S. (2016). Civil liberties and volunteering in six former Soviet Union countries. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45(6), 1150–1168. https://doi.org/10.1177/089976401664968Google Scholar
Kang, C. H., Baek, Y. M., & Kim, E. H.-J. (2021). Half a century of NVSQ: Thematic stability across years and editors. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 08997640211017676. https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640211017676Google Scholar
Kingma, B. R. (2003). Public good theories of the nonprofit sector. In Anheier, H. K. & Ben-Ner, A. (Eds.), The study of the nonprofit enterprise: Theories and approaches (pp. 53–65). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0131-2_3Google Scholar
Kramer, R. M. (2000). A third sector in the third millennium? Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 11(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008914531485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, R. M., Kramer, R. M., & Wilensky, H. L. (1981). Voluntary agencies in the welfare state. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Krashinsky, M. (1984). Transactions costs and a theory of the non-profit organization. (Working Paper #84). Program on Non-Profit Organizations, Institution for Social and Policy Studies, Yale University.Google Scholar
Lecy, J. (2020). Nonprofit open data collective. Nonprofit Open Data Collective. https://nonprofit-open-data-collective.github.io//Google Scholar
LePere-Schloop, M., & Nesbit, R. (2022a). Disciplinary contributions to nonprofit studies: A 20-year empirical mapping of journals publishing nonprofit research and journal citations by nonprofit scholars. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 52(1_suppl), 68S–101S. https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640221119728Google Scholar
LePere-Schloop, M., & Nesbit, R. (2022b) The nexus of public administration, public policy, and nonprofit studies: An empirical mapping of research topics and knowledge integration. Public Administration Review, 83(3), 486–502. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13587Google Scholar
Lipsky, M., & Smith, S. R. (1989). Nonprofit organizations, government, and the welfare state. Political Science Quarterly, 104(4), 625–648. https://doi.org/10.2307/2151102Google Scholar
Lohmann, R. A. (1989). And lettuce is nonanimal: Toward a positive economics of voluntary action. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 18(4), 367–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lohmann, R. A. (1992a). The commons: A multidisciplinary approach to nonprofit organization, voluntary action, and philanthropy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 21(3), 309–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640920210030Google Scholar
Lohmann, R. A. (1992b). The commons: New perspectives on nonprofit organization, voluntary action and philanthropy. Faculty Scholarship, 754. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/faculty_publications/754Google Scholar
Lohmann, R. A. (1995). Commons: Can this be the name of “thirdness”? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 24(1), 25–29.Google Scholar
Lohmann, R. A. (2011). 14. Deliberation and dialogue and commons theory. In Resolving community conflicts and problems (pp. 264–276). Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lohmann, R. A. (2015). Voluntary action in new commons. Faculty Scholarship, 760. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/faculty_publications/760Google Scholar
Loper, E., & Bird, S. (2002). NLTK: The Natural Language Toolkit. ArXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0205028Google Scholar
Ma, J., & Konrath, S. (2018). A century of nonprofit studies: Scaling the knowledge of the field. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 29(6), 1139–1158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-018-00057-5Google Scholar
Miles, M., Huberman, A., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). Sage.Google Scholar
Mirabella, R. M. (2007). University-based educational programs in nonprofit management and philanthropic studies: A 10-year review and projections of future trends. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(4_suppl), 11S–27S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764007305051Google Scholar
Mirabella, R. M., & Wish, N. B. (2000). The “best place” debate: A comparison of graduate education programs for nonprofit managers. Public Administration Review, 60(3), 219–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00082Google Scholar
National Academies. (2005). Facilitating interdisciplinary research. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/11153Google Scholar
Ortmann, A., & Schlesinger, M. (1997). Trust, repute and the role of non-profit enterprise. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 8(2), 97–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02354189Google Scholar
Ortmann, A., & Schlesinger, M. (2003). Trust, repute, and the role of nonprofit enterprise. In Anheier, H. K. & Ben-Ner, A. (Eds.), The study of the nonprofit enterprise: Theories and approaches (pp. 77–114). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0131-2_5Google Scholar
Paarlberg, L. E., LePere-Schloop, M., Walk, M., Ai, J., & Ming, Y. (2020). Activating community resilience: The emergence of COVID-19 funds across the United States. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 49(6), 1119–1128. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764020968155Google Scholar
Paarlberg, L. E., Nesbit, R., Clerkin, R. M., & Christensen, R. K. (2019). The politics of donations: Are red counties more donative than blue counties? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 48(2), 283–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764018804088Google Scholar
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (2003). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Porter, A. L., Roessner, J. D., Cohen, A. S., & Perreault, M. (2006). Interdisciplinary research: Meaning, metrics and nurture. Research Evaluation, 15(3), 187–196. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154406781775841Google Scholar
Preston, A. E. (1988). The nonprofit firm: A potential solution to inherent market failures. Economic Inquiry, 26(3), 493–506. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1988.tb01511.xGoogle Scholar
Putnam, R. D. (1995). Tuning in, tuning out: The strange disappearance of social capital in America. PS: Political Science & Politics, 28(4), 664–683. https://doi.org/10.2307/420517Google Scholar
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. D., Leonardi, R., & Nanetti, R. Y. (1992). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rafols, I., & Meyer, M. (2010). Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: Case studies in bionanoscience. Scientometrics, 82(2), 263–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0041-yGoogle Scholar
Rose-Ackerman, S. (1996). Altruism, nonprofits, and economic theory. Journal of Economic Literature, 34(2), 701–728. www.jstor.org/stable/2729219Google Scholar
Salamon, L. M. (1987a). Partners in public service. In Powell, W. W. & Steinberg, R. (Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (1st ed., Vol. 43, p. 45). Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Salamon, L. M. (1987b). Of market failure, voluntary failure, and third-party government: Toward a theory of government-nonprofit relations in the modern welfare state. Journal of Voluntary Action Research, 16(1–2), 29–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/089976408701600104Google Scholar
Salamon, L. M. (1995). Partners in public service: Government-nonprofit relations in the modern welfare state. Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Salamon, L. M. (2003). Voluntary failure theory correctly viewed. In Anheier, H. K. & Ben-Ner, A. (Eds.), The study of the nonprofit enterprise: Theories and approaches (pp. 183–186). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0131-2_11Google Scholar
Salamon, L. M. (2016). Market failure. In Ott, J. S. & Dicke, L. A. (Eds.), Nature of the nonprofit sector (pp. 230–234). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367696559-21Google Scholar
Salamon, L. M., & Anheier, H. K. (1997). Defining the nonprofit sector: A cross-national analysis. Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Salamon, L. M., & Anheier, H. K. (1998). Social origins of civil society: Explaining the nonprofit sector cross-nationally. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 9(3), 213–248. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022058200985Google Scholar
Salamon, L. M., & Elliott, O. V. (2002). The tools of government: A guide to the new governance. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Salamon, L. M., & Toepler, S. (2015). Government–nonprofit cooperation: Anomaly or necessity? Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 26(6), 2155–2177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-015-9651-6Google Scholar
Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Shier, M. L., & Handy, F. (2014). Research trends in nonprofit graduate studies: A growing interdisciplinary field. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(5), 812–831. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764014548279Google Scholar
Skocpol, T. (1996). Unravelling from above. The American Prospect, 25, 20–24.Google Scholar
Skocpol, T. (1997). The Tocqueville problem: Civic engagement in American democracy. Social Science History, 21(4), 455–479. https://doi.org/10.2307/1171662Google Scholar
Skocpol, T. (2003). Diminished democracy: From membership to management in American civic life (Vol. 8). University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Skocpol, T., & Fiorina, M. P. (2004). Civic engagement in American democracy. Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Skocpol, T., Cobb, R. V., & Klofstad, C. A. (2005). Disconnection and reorganization: The transformation of civic life in late-twentieth-century America. Studies in American Political Development, 19(2), 137–156. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0898588X0500009XGoogle Scholar
Skocpol, T., Ganz, M., & Munson, Z. (2000). A nation of organizers: The institutional origins of civic voluntarism in the United States. American Political Science Review, 94(3), 527–546. https://doi.org/10.2307/2585829Google Scholar
Smith, D. H. (1994). Determinants of voluntary association participation and volunteering: A literature review. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 23(3), 243–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/089976409402300305Google Scholar
Smith, D. H. (1997). Grassroots associations are important: Some theory and a review of the impact literature. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 26(3), 269–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640972630Google Scholar
Smith, D. H. (2000). Grassroots associations. SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
Smith, D. H. (2003). A history of ARNOVA. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 32(3), 458–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640972630Google Scholar
Smith, S. R., & Grønbjerg, K. A. (2006). Scope and theory of government-nonprofit relations. In Powell, W. W. & Steinberg, R. (Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (2nd ed.) (pp. 221–242). Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, S. R., & Lipsky, M. (2009). Nonprofits for hire: The welfare state in the age of contracting. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674043817Google Scholar
Soskis, B. (2006). A history of associational life and the nonprofit sector in the United States. In Powell, W. W. & Bromley, P. (Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (3rd ed.) (pp. 221–242). Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Steinberg, R. (1997). Overall evaluation of economic theories. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 8(2), 179–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02354194Google Scholar
Steinberg, R. (2003). Economic theories of nonprofit organizations. In Anheier, H. K. & Ben-Ner, A. (Eds.), The study of the nonprofit enterprise: Theories and approaches (pp. 277–309). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-0131-2_16Google Scholar
Steinberg, R. (2006). Economic theories of nonprofit organizations. In Powell, W. W. & Steinberg, R. (Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (2nd ed.) (pp. 117–139). Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, J. E. (1989). Markets, market failures, and development. The American Economic Review, 79(2), 197–203. www.jstor.org/stable/1827756Google Scholar
Sutton, R. I., & Staw, B. M. (1995). What theory is not. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(3), 371–384. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393788Google Scholar
Theiss-Morse, E., & Hibbing, J. R. (2005). Citizenship and civic engagement. Annual Review of Political Science-Palo Alto, 8, 227–249. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.8.082103.104829Google Scholar
Tschirhart, M., & Gazley, B. (2014). Advancing scholarship on membership associations: New research and next steps. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 43(2_suppl), 35–175. https://doi.org/10.1177/089976401351705Google Scholar
Van Til, J. (2008). Growing civil society: From nonprofit sector to third space. Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wan Utap, A. K., Zainab, A. N., & Anuar, N. B. (2009). Bibliometric studies on single journals: A review. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 14(1), Article 1.Google Scholar
Warren, M. E. (2022). Democracy and association. In Democracy and association. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Weick, K. E. (1995). What theory is not, theorizing is. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(3), 385–390. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393789Google Scholar
Weisbrod, B. (1977). The voluntary nonprofit sector: An economic analysis. Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Weisbrod, B. (1986). Toward a theory of the voluntary nonprofit sector in a three-sector economy. In Rose-Ackerman, S. (Ed.), The economics of nonprofit institutions (pp. 21–44). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weisbrod, B. (2009). The nonprofit economy. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Winston, C. (2007). Government failure versus market failure: Microeconomics policy research and government performance. Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Wolch, J. R. (1990). The shadow state: Government and voluntary sector in transition. Foundation Center.Google Scholar
Wolfram, D. (2003). Applied informetrics for information retrieval research. Greenwood.Google Scholar
Woolcock, M. (1998). Social capital and economic development: Toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory and Society, 27(2), 151–208. www.jstor.org/stable/657866Google Scholar
Wry, T., Cobb, J. A., & Aldrich, H. (2013). More than a metaphor: Assessing the historical legacy of resource dependence and its contemporary promise as a theory of environmental complexity. Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 441–488. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2013.781862Google Scholar
Wuthnow, R. (1998). Loose connections: Joining together in America’s fragmented communities. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Young, D. (1980). Entrepreneurship and the behavior of nonprofit organizations: Elements of a theory. Institution for Social and Policy Studies, Yale University.Google Scholar
Young, D. (1983). If not for profit, for what? Lexington Books. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/facbooks2013/1Google Scholar
Young, D. (1989a). Contract failure theory. In Shafriz, J. (Ed.), International encyclopedia of public policy and administration (Vol. 3, pp. 230–234). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429045097Google Scholar
Young, D. (1989b). Government failure theory. In Shafriz, J. (Ed.), International encyclopedia of public policy and administration (Vol. 1, pp. 235–237). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429045097Google Scholar
Young, D. (1989c). Third party government. In Shafriz, J. (Ed.), International encyclopedia of public policy and administration (Vol. 4). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429045097Google Scholar
Young, D. (2000). Alternative models of government–nonprofit sector relations: Theoretical and international perspectives. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(1), 149–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764000291009Google Scholar
Young, D. (2006). Complementary, supplementary or adversarial? Nonprofit-Government Relations. In E. T. Boris & C.E. Steuerle (Eds.), Nonprofit and government: Collaboration and conflict (pp. 37–80). Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar
Young, D. (2016a). Contract failure theory. In Ott, J. S. & Dicke, L. A. (Eds.), The nature of the nonprofit sector (3rd ed.) (pp. 230–234). Routledge.Google Scholar
Young, D. (2016b). Government failure theory. In Ott, J. S. & Dicke, L. A. (Eds.), The nature of the nonprofit sector (3rd ed.) (pp. 126–128). Westview Press.Google Scholar
Young, D. (2016c). Third party government. In Ott, J. S. & Dicke, L. A. (Eds.), The nature of the nonprofit sector (3rd ed.) (pp. 323–326). Westview Press.Google Scholar

References

Abend, G. (2008). The meaning of “theory.” Sociological Theory, 26(2), 173–199.Google Scholar
Abramson, A. J. (2022). Assessing the state of the US nonprofit sector: What indicators should we use? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 08997640221091534.Google Scholar
Alchian, A. A., & Demsetz, H. (1972). Production, information costs, and economic organization. The American Economic Review, 62(5), 777–795.Google Scholar
Arrow, K. J. (2012). Social choice and individual values (Vol. 12). Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Blakeley, G. (2002). Civil society. In Blakeley, G. & Bryson, V. (Eds.), Contemporary political concepts: A critical introduction (pp. 90–107). London; Sterling, Virginia: Pluto Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctt18fs3n8.9Google Scholar
Calder, B. J., & Tybout, A. M. (2016). What makes a good theory practical? AMS Review, 6, 116–124.Google Scholar
Considine, M. (2003). Governance and competition: The role of non-profit organisations in the delivery of public services. Australian Journal of Political Science, 38(1), 63. https://doi-org.erl.lib.byu.edu/10.1080/1036114032000056251Google Scholar
Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2011). Building theory about theory building: What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 12–32.Google Scholar
Cunliffe, A. L. (2022). Must I grow a pair of balls to theorize about theory in organization and management studies? Organization Theory, 3(3), 26317877221109277.Google Scholar
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32.Google Scholar
Faulks, K., Phillips, K., & Thomson, A. (2003). Political theory. In Faulks, Keith, Phillips, Ken, & Thomson, Alex (Eds.), Get set for politics (pp. 61–80). Edinburgh University Press. doi:10.3366/j.ctvxcrd7k.7Google Scholar
Flynn, P., & Hodgkinson, V. A. (Eds.). (2001). Measuring the impact of the nonprofit sector. Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
Gioia, D. A., & Pitre, E. (1990). Multiparadigm perspectives on theory building. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 584–602.Google Scholar
Langton, S. (1987). Envoi: Developing nonprofit sector theory. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 16(1–2), 134–148.Google Scholar
Lohmann, R. A. (2007). Charity, philanthropy, public service, or enterprise: What are the big questions of nonprofit management today? Public Administration Review, 67(3), 437–444.Google Scholar
Lynham, S. A. (2002). The general method of theory-building research in applied disciplines. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 4(3), 221–241.Google Scholar
Mirvis, P. H., & Hackett, E. J. (1983). Work and work force characteristics in the nonprofit sector. Monthly Labor Review, 106(4), 3–12.Google Scholar
Mouzelis, N. (1993). The poverty of sociological theory. Sociology, 27(4), 675–695. Retrieved June 6, 2020, from www.jstor.org/stable/42855272Google Scholar
O’Shaughnessy, J. (1973). Inquiry and decision: A methodology for management and the social sciences. Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Reuter, M., Wijkström, F., & Meyer, M. (2014). Who calls the shots? The real normative power of civil society. In M. Freise & T. Hallmann (Eds.), Modernizing democracy (pp. 71–82). Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Rock, P. (2016). Making of symbolic interactionism. Springer.Google Scholar
Sager, R. (2010) Theories of nonprofit sector, sociological. In Anheier, H. K. & Toepler, S. (Eds.), International encyclopedia of civil society. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Smith, D. H. (1997). The rest of the nonprofit sector: Grassroots associations as the dark matter ignored in prevailing “flat earth” maps of the sector. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 26(2), 114–131.Google Scholar
Tilly, C. (1992). Coercion, capital, and European states, AD 990–1992. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Turner, C. (2010). Investigating sociological theory. Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Overviews
  • Edited by Eva Witesman, Brigham Young University, Utah, Curtis Child, Brigham Young University, Utah
  • Book: Reimagining Nonprofits
  • Online publication: 11 January 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009262057.002
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Overviews
  • Edited by Eva Witesman, Brigham Young University, Utah, Curtis Child, Brigham Young University, Utah
  • Book: Reimagining Nonprofits
  • Online publication: 11 January 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009262057.002
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Overviews
  • Edited by Eva Witesman, Brigham Young University, Utah, Curtis Child, Brigham Young University, Utah
  • Book: Reimagining Nonprofits
  • Online publication: 11 January 2024
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009262057.002
Available formats
×