Convention on Biological Diversity, opened for signature 5 June 1992, 1760 UNTS 79 (entered into force 29 December 1993)Google Scholar

Doha Amendment to the Kyoto Protocol, adopted on 8 December 2012, UNTS XXVII.7.c (entered into force 31 December 2020)Google Scholar

International Labour Organization (ILO), Convention (No 169) Concerning Indigenous and Tribal Peoples in Independent Countries, opened for signature 27 June 1989, 1650 UNTS 383 (entered into force 5 September 1991)Google Scholar

International Tropical Timber Agreement, 1983, opened for signature 18 November 1983, 1393 UNTS 119 (entered into force 1 April 1985)Google Scholar

International Tropical Timber Agreement, 1994, opened for signature 1 April 1994, 1955 UNTS 81 (entered into force 1 January 1997)Google Scholar

International Tropical Timber Agreement, 2006, opened for signature 3 April 2006, 2797 UNTS 75 (entered into force 7 December 2011)Google Scholar

Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, opened for signature 16 March 1998, 2303 UNTS 148 (entered into force on 16 February 2005)Google Scholar

Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from Their Utilization to the Convention on Biological Diversity, opened for signature 2 February 2011, UN Doc UNEP/CBD/COP/DEC/X/1, annex I (entered into force 12 October 2014)Google Scholar

Paris Agreement, opened for signature on 22 April 2016, UNTS XXVII.7.d (entered into force 4 November 2016)Google Scholar

Southern African Development Community, Protocol on Forestry, 3 October 2002 (entered into force 17 July 2009)Google Scholar

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, opened for signature 4 June 1992, 771 UNTS 107 (entered into force 21 March 1994)Google Scholar

Decision 1/CP.1, ‘The Berlin Mandate: Review of the adequacy of Article 4, paragraph 2(a) and (b), of the Convention, including proposals related to a protocol and decisions on follow up’ FCCC/CP/1995/7/Add.1 (6 June 1995)Google Scholar

Decision 5/CP.6, ‘The Bonn Agreement on the implementation of the Buenos Aires Plan of Action’ FCCC/CP/2001/5 (29 October 2001)Google Scholar

Decision 15/CP.7, ‘Principles, nature and scope of the mechanisms pursuant to Articles 6, 12 and 17 of the Kyoto Protocol’, FCCC/CP/2001/13/Add.2 (21 January 2002)Google Scholar

Decision 16/CP.7, ‘Guidelines for the implementation of Article 6 of the Kyoto Protocol’, FCCC/CP/2001/13/Add.2 (21 January 2002)Google Scholar

Decision 17/CP.7, ‘Modalities and procedures for a clean development mechanism, as defined in Article 12 of the Kyoto Protocol’, FCCC/CP/2001/13/Add.2 (21 January 2002)Google Scholar

Decision 18/CP.7, ‘Modalities, rules and guidelines for emissions trading under Article 17 of the Kyoto Protocol’, FCCC/CP/2001/13/Add.2 (21 January 2002)Google Scholar

Decision 19/CP.9, ‘Modalities and procedures for afforestation and reforestation project activities under the clean development mechanism in the first commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol’ FCCC/CP/2003/6/Add.2 (30 March 2004)Google Scholar

Decision 1/CP.13 ‘Bali Action Plan’ FCCC/CP/2007/6/Add.1 (14 March 2008)Google Scholar

Decision 2/CP.13, ‘Reducing emissions from deforestation in developing countries: Approaches to stimulate action’, FCCC/CP/2007/6/Add.1 (14 March 2008)Google Scholar

Decision 2/CP.15 ‘Copenhagen Accord’ FCCC/CP/2009/11/Add.1 (30 March 2010)Google Scholar

Decision 4/CP.15 ‘Methodological guidance for activities relating to reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation and the role of conservation, sustainable management of forests and enhancement of forest carbon stocks in developing countries’ FCCC/CP/2009/11/Add.1 (30 March 2010)Google Scholar

Decision 1/CP.16 ‘The Cancun Agreements: Outcome of the work of the Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-term Cooperative Action under the Convention’ FCCC/CP/2010/7/Add.1 (15 March 2011)Google Scholar

Decision 2/CP.17 ‘Outcome of the work of the Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-Term Cooperative Action under the Convention’ FCCC/CP/2011/9/Add.1 (15 March 2012)Google Scholar

Decision 12/CP.17 ‘Guidance on systems for providing information on how safeguards are addressed and respected and modalities relating to forest reference emission levels and forest reference levels as referred to in Decision 1/CP.16’ FCCC/CP/2011/9/Add.2 (15 March 2012)Google Scholar

Decision 1/CP.18, ‘Agreed outcome pursuant to the Bali Action Plan’, FCCC/CP/2012/8/Add.1 (28 February 2013)Google Scholar

Decision 9/CP.19, ‘Work programme on result-based finance to progress the full implementation of the activities referred to in Decision 1/CP.16, paragraph 70’, FCCC/CP/2013/10/Add.1 (31 January 2014)Google Scholar

Decision 10/CP.19, ‘Coordination of support for the implementation of activities in relation to mitigation actions in the forest sector by developing countries, including institutional arrangements’, FCCC/CP/2013/10/Add.1 (31 January 2014)Google Scholar

Decision 11/CP.19, ‘Modalities for national forest monitoring systems’, FCCC/CP/2013/10/Add.1 (31 January 2014)Google Scholar

Decision 12/CP.19, ‘The timing and frequency of presentation of the summary of information on how all the safeguards referred to in Decision 1/CP.16, appendix I, are being addressed and respected’, FCCC/CP/2013/10/Add.1 (31 January 2014)Google Scholar

Decision 13/CP.19, ‘Guidelines and procedures for the technical assessment of submissions from Parties on proposed forest reference emissions levels and/or forest reference levels’, FCCC/CP/2013/10/Add.1 (31 January 2014)Google Scholar

Decision 14/CP.19, ‘Modalities for measuring, reporting and verifying’, FCCC/CP/2013/10/Add.1 (31 January 2014)Google Scholar

Decision 15/CP.19, ‘Addressing the drivers of deforestation and forest degradation’, FCCC/CP/2013/10/Add.1 (31 January 2014)Google Scholar

Decision 16/CP.21, ‘Alternative policy approaches, such as joint mitigation and adaptation approaches for the integral and sustainable management of forests’, FCCC/CP/2015/10/Add.3 (29 January 2016)Google Scholar

Decision 17/CP.21, ‘Further guidance on ensuring transparency, consistency, comprehensiveness and effectiveness when informing on how all the safeguards referred to in Decision 1/CP.16, appendix I, are being address and respected’, FCCC/SBSTA/2015/L.5/Add.3 (29 January 2016)Google Scholar

Decision 18/CP.21, ‘Methodological issues related to non-carbon benefits resulting from the implementation of the activities referred to in Decision 1/CP.16, paragraph 70’, FCCC/2015/10/Add.3 (29 January 2016)Google Scholar

Draft Decision -/CP.15 Policy ‘Approaches and positive incentives on issues relating to reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in developing countries; and the role of conservation, sustainable management of forests and enhancement of forest carbon sinks in developing countries’ FCCC/AWGLCA/2009/L.7/Add.6 (15 December 2009)Google Scholar

Decision 1/CMP.1 ‘Consideration of commitments for subsequent periods for Parties included in Annex I to the Convention under Article 3, paragraph 9, of the Kyoto Protocol’ FCCC/KP/CMP/2005/8/Add.1 (30 March 2006)Google Scholar

Decision 2/CMP.1 ‘Principles, nature and scope of the mechanisms pursuant to Article 6, 12 and 17 of the Kyoto Protocol’ FCCC/KP/CMP/2005/8/Add.1 (30 March 2006)Google Scholar

Decision 16/CMP.1 ‘Land use, land-use change and forestry’ FCCC/KP/CMP/2005/8/Add.3 (30 March 2006)Google Scholar

Decision 1/CMP.8, ‘Amendment to the Kyoto Protocol pursuant to its Article 3, paragraph 9 (the Doha Amendment)’, FCCC/KP/CMP/2012/13/Add.1 (28 February 2013)Google Scholar

Decision 8/CMA.1 ‘Matters relating to Article 6 of the Paris Agreement and paragraphs 36–40 of Decision 1/CP.21’, FCCC/PA/CMA/2018/3/Add.1 (19 March 2019)Google Scholar

Green Climate Fund, ‘Decision B.08/08’, Decisions of the Board – Eighth Meeting of the Board 14–17 October 2014, GCF/B.08/45 (3 December 2014)Google Scholar

Green Climate Fund, ‘Decision B.14/03’, Decisions of the Board – Fourteenth Meeting of the Board 12–14 October 2016, GCF/B.14/17 (2 November 2016)Google Scholar

Alston, P., Climate Change and Poverty – Report of the Special Rapporteur on Extreme Poverty and Human Rights, A/HRC/41/39 (25 June 2019)Google Scholar

Anaya, J., Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, James Anaya, Human Rights Council, 21st session, A/HRC/21/47 (6 July 2012)Google Scholar

Anaya, J., Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, James Anaya: Extractive industries and Indigenous peoples, Human Rights Council, 24th session, A/HRC/24/41 (1 July 2013)Google Scholar

Anaya, J., Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Situation of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of Indigenous Peoples, James Anaya, General Assembly, A/HRC/12/34 (15 July 2009)Google Scholar

Beyani, C., Protection of and Assistance to Internally Displaced Persons, A/66/285 (9 August 2011)Google Scholar

Case of the Saramaka People v. Suriname, Inter-American Court of Human Rights, Series C No. 172, Judgment of 28 November 2007Google Scholar

Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, Statement on Climate Change and the Covenant (2018)Google Scholar

The Concept of Indigenous Peoples: Background Paper Prepared for the Secretariat of the Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues (2004) PFII/2004/WS.1/3Google Scholar

Convention on Biological Diversity, Who Are Local Communities? UNEP/CBD/WS-CB/LAC/1/INF/5 (16 November 2006)Google Scholar

Crépeau, F., Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Human Rights of Migrants, A/67/299 (13 August 2012)Google Scholar

Daes, E.-I. A., Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Indigenous Peoples: Indigenous Peoples’ Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources: Final Report of the Special Rapporteur, E/CN.4/2004/30 (2004)Google Scholar

Daes, E.-I. A., Report of the Working Group on Indigenous Populations on Its Fifteenth Session, Sub-Commission on the Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities, E/CN.4/Sub.2/1997/14 (13 August 1997)Google Scholar

Daes, E.-I. A. and Eide, A., Working Paper on the Relationship and Distinction between the Rights of Persons Belonging to Minorities and Those of Indigenous Peoples, Economic and Social Council, Commission on Human Rights, Sub-commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights, E/CN.4/Sub.2/2000/10 (19 July 2000)Google Scholar

Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment (Report of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, Stockholm, 5–16 June 1972) A/CONF.48/14/Rev.1Google Scholar

Draft Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (1994) UN Doc. E/CN.4/Sub.2/1994/2/Add.1Google Scholar

Economic and Social Council Resolution 2000/35, Report on the Fourth Session of the Intergovernmental Forum on Forests, 46th plen mtg, E/RES/2000/35 (18 October 2000)Google Scholar

Elver, H., Interim Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food, A/70/287 (5 August 2015)Google Scholar

The Extent to Which Climate Change Policies and Projects Adhere to the Standards Set Forth in the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples: Concept Note Submitted by the Permanent Forum Special Rapporteurs, United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues, Eighth Session, E/C.19/2009/5 (25 March 2009)Google Scholar

Final Study on Indigenous Peoples and the Right to Participate in Decision-Making: Report of the Expert Mechanism on the Right of Indigenous Peoples, Human Rights Council, Expert Mechanism on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, 4th session, A/HRC/EMRIP/2011/2 (26 May 2011)Google Scholar

Forest Carbon Partnership Facility, Carbon Fund: Methodological Framework (Revised final, 22 June 2016)Google Scholar

Forest Carbon Partnership Facility, R-PP Template Version 6, for Country Use (April 20, 2012)Google Scholar

Forest Carbon Partnership Fund Participants Committee, Resolution PC/18/2014/2 ‘Adoption of FCPF General Conditions Applicable to Emissions Reductions Payment Agreement’, 18th Meeting (PC18), Arusha, Tanzania 31 October–4 November 2014Google Scholar

Free, Prior and Informed Consent: A Human Rights-Based Approach – Study on the Expert Mechanism on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, General Assembly, A/HRC/39/62 (10 August 2018)Google Scholar

General Assembly, Provisional Record of the Thirty-Fifth Meeting, 43rd session, A/43/PV.35 (25 October 1988)Google Scholar

General Assembly Resolution 41/128, Declaration on the Right to Development, 97th plen mtg, A/RES/41/128 (4 December 1986)Google Scholar

General Assembly Resolution 43/53, Protection of Global Climate for Present and Future Generations of Mankind, 70th plen mtg, A/RES/43/53 (6 December 1988)Google Scholar

General Assembly Resolution 44/228, United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, 85th plen mtg, A/RES/44/228 (22 December 1989)Google Scholar

General Assembly Resolution 61/295, United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, UN GAOR 61st sess, 107th plen mtg, Supp No 49, UN Doc A/61/67 (13 September 2007)Google Scholar

General Assembly Resolution 62/98, Non-Legally Binding Instrument on All Types of Forests, UN GAOR 62nd sess, 74th plen mtg, Agenda Item 54, A/RES/62/98 (31 January 2008)Google Scholar

General Assembly Resolution 66/288, The Future We Want, UN GAOR 66th sess, 123rd plen mtg, Agenda Item 19, Supp No 49, A/RES/66/288 (11 September 2012)Google Scholar

General Assembly Resolution 70/1, Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, UNGAOR 70th sess, 4th plen mtg, UN Doc A/RES/70/1 (21 October 2015)Google Scholar

General Assembly Resolution 1803, Permanent Sovereignty over Natural Resources, UNGAOR 17th sess, 1194th plen mtg, Agenda Item 39, UN Doc. A/5217 (14 December 1962)Google Scholar

General Assembly Resolution 3202(S-VI), Programme of Action on the Establishment of a New International Economic Order, A/RES/S-6/3203 (1 May 1974)Google Scholar

General Assembly Resolution 3281(XXIX), Charter of Economic Rights and Duties of States, Twenty-Ninth Session, Agenda Item 48, A/RES/29/3281 (12 December 1974)Google Scholar

General Assembly Resolution S-18/3, Declaration on International Economic Co-operation, in particular the Revitalization of Economic Growth and Development of the Developing Countries, 11th plenary meeting, A/RES/S-18/3 (1 May 1990)Google Scholar

Green Climate Fund, Green Climate Fund support for the early phases of REDD+, GCF/B.17/16 (2 July 2017)Google Scholar

Green Climate Fund, Initial Social Model and Performance Measurement Framework for REDD+ Result-based Payments, GCF/B.08/08/Rev.01 (17 October 2014)Google Scholar

Green Climate Fund, Support for REDD-plus, GCF/B.14/03 (10 October 2016)Google Scholar

Human Rights Committee, General Comment No. 36 - Article 6: Right to Life, CCPR/C/GC/36 (3 September 2019)Google Scholar

Id Balkassm, H. and Hasteh, P., Study on the Extent to Which Climate Change Policies and Project Adhere to the Standards Set Forth in the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples: Note by the Secretariat, United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues, Ninth Session, E/C.19/2010/7 (2 February 2010)Google Scholar

International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, Charter Establishing the Forest Carbon Partnership Facility (23 November 2015)Google Scholar

International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, General Conditions Applicable to Emission Reductions Payment Agreements for the Forest Carbon Partnership Facility Emission Reductions Programs (1 November 2014)Google Scholar

International Law Association, Sofia Conference: Rights of Indigenous Peoples, Final Report (2012)Google Scholar

International Union for the Conservation of Nature, The Durban Action Plan Revised Version, March 2004, cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/durbanactionen.pdfGoogle Scholar

Kälin, W., Report of the Representative of the Secretary-General on the Human Rights of Internally Displaced Persons, A/65/282 (11 August 2010)Google Scholar

Knox, J., Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Issue of Human Rights Obligations Relating to the Enjoyment of a Safe, Clean, Healthy and Sustainable Environment, A/HRC/31/52 (1 February 2016)Google Scholar

Martínez Cobo, J. R., Study on the Problem of Discrimination against Indigenous Populations, UN Doc E/CN.4/Sub.2/1986/7 and Add. 1–4 (1986)Google Scholar

Ministerial Declaration and Message from the United Nations Forum on Forests to the World Summit on Sustainable Development, A/CONF.199/PC/8 (19 March 2002)Google Scholar

Murase, S., Second Report on the Protection of the Atmosphere by Special Rapporteur, International Law Commission, 67th session, A/CN.4/681 (2 March 2015)Google Scholar

Non-Legally Binding Authoritative Statement of Principles for a Global Consensus on the Management, Conservation and Sustainable Development of All Types of Forests, Report of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro, A/CONF.151/26 (Vol. III) (14 August 1992)Google Scholar

Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues: Report on the Seventh Session (21 April–2 May 2008), Economic and Social Council, E/2008/43, E/C.19/2008/13 (14 May 2008)Google Scholar

Report of the Expert Group Meeting on Identification of Principles of International Law for Sustainable Development, United Nations Commission on Sustainable Development, Geneva, 26–28 September 1995Google Scholar

Report of the International Workshop on Methodologies Regarding Free, Prior and Informed Consent and Indigenous Peoples (New York, 17–19 January 2005), UN Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues, Fourth Session, E/C.19/2005/3 (17 February 2006)Google Scholar

Report of the Tenth Session, United Nations Forum on Forests (4 February 2011 and 8 and 9 April 2013) E/2013/42, E/CN.18/2013/18Google Scholar

Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, UN Doc. A/CONF.151/26 (vol. I); 31 ILM 874 (1992)Google Scholar

Rolnik, R., Report of the Special Rapporteur on Adequate Housing As a Component of the Right to an Adequate Standard of Living, and on the Right to Non-Discrimination in This Context, A/64/255 (6 August 2009)Google Scholar

Sena, P. K., Cunningham, M., and Xavier, B., Indigenous People’s Rights and Safeguards in Projects Related to Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation: Note by the Secretariat, UN ESCOR, Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues, 12th sess, Agenda Item 5, UN Doc E/C.19/2013/7 (5 February 2013)Google Scholar

Tauli-Corpuz, V., Report of the Special Rapporteur of the Human Rights Council on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, Victoria Tauli-Corpuz, General Assembly, A/71/229 (29 July 2016)Google Scholar

Tauli-Corpuz, V., Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, A/HRC/36/46 (1 November 2017)Google Scholar

Tauli-Corpuz, V. and Baer, L.-A., Results of the Copenhagen Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change; Implications for Indigenous Peoples’ Local Adaptation and Mitigation Measures, Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues, 9th session, E/C.19/2010/18 (2 March 2010)Google Scholar

Tauli-Corpuz, V. and Lynge, A., Impact of Climate Change Mitigation Measures on Indigenous Peoples and Their Territories and Lands, United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues, Seventh Session, E/C.19/2008/10 (20 March 2008)Google Scholar

Trail Smelter Arbitration (USA v Canada, 1938/1941), UN.RIAA, Vol. IIIGoogle Scholar

UNFCCC, Financing Options for the Full Implementation of Results-Based Actions Relating to the Activities Referred to in Decision 1/CP.16, paragraph 70, Including Related Modalities and Procedures: Technical Paper, FCCC/TP/2012/3 (26 July 2012)Google Scholar

UNFCCC, Issues Relating to Reducing Emissions from Deforestation in Developing Countries and Recommendations on Any Further Process. Submissions from Parties, FCCC/SBSTA/2006/MISC.5 (11 April 2006) and Add.2 (10 May 2006)Google Scholar

UNFCCC, Joint Submission by Costa Rica and Papua New Guinea: Reducing Emissions from Deforestation in Developing Countries: Approaches to Stimulate Action: Submission from Parties, FCCC/CP/2005/MISC.1 (11 November 2005)Google Scholar

UNFCCC, Reducing Emissions from Deforestation in Developing Countries: Approaches to Stimulate Action: Draft Conclusions Proposed by the President, FCCC/CP/2005/L.2 (6 December 2005)Google Scholar

UNFCCC, Reducing Emissions from Deforestation in Developing Countries: Approaches to Stimulate Action: Submissions from Parties, FCCC/CP/2005/MISC.1 (11 November 2005)Google Scholar

UNFCCC, Report of the Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice on Its Twenty-Ninth Session, Held in Poznań from 1 to 10 December 2008, FCCC/SBSTA/2008/13 (17 February 2009)Google Scholar

UNFCCC, Report on the Second Workshop on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation in Developing Countries: Note by the Secretariat, FCCC/SBSTA/2007/3 (17 April 2007)Google Scholar

UNFCCC, Report on the Workshop on Methodological Issues Relating to Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Developing Countries: A Note from the Secretariat, FCCC/SBSTA/2008/11 (8 September 2008)Google Scholar

UNFCCC, Report on a Workshop on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation in Developing Countries: Note by the Secretariat, FCCC/SBSTA/2006/10 (11 October 2006)Google Scholar

UNFCCC, Views on the Range of Topics and Other Relevant Information Relating to Reducing Emissions from Deforestation in Developing Countries. Submissions from Parties, FCCC/SBSTA/2007/MISC.2 (2 March 2007) and Add.1 (3 April 2007)Google Scholar

UNFCCC, Issues Relating to Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities for the Development and Application of Methodologies: Submissions from Parties, FCCC/SBSTA/2009/MISC.1 (10 March 2009), Add.1 (17 April 2009) and Add.2 (27 June 2009)Google Scholar

UNFCCC, Joint Submission under the Cancun Agreements: Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Developing Countries, Submission by Australia and Indonesia to SBSTA, FCCC/SBSTA/2011/MISC.7/Add.3 (9 December 2011)Google Scholar

UNFCCC, Report on the Expert Meeting on Methodological Issues Relating to Reference Emission Levels and Reference Levels: Note by the Secretariat, FCCC/SBSTA/2009/2 (14 May 2009)Google Scholar

UNFCCC, Submission by the Plurinational State of Bolivia to the Ad Hoc Working Group on Long Term Co-operative Action, FCCC/AWGLCA/2010/MISC.2 (30 April 2010)Google Scholar

UNFCCC, Submission by the Plurinational State of Bolivia, Joint Mitigation and Adaptation Mechanism: ‘Sustainable Forest Life’ (December 2011)Google Scholar

UNFCCC, Submission of Views by the Democratic Republic of Congo on Behalf of the Coalition for Rainforest Nations on Article 6, paragraph 2 of the Paris Agreement. Views on Guidance on Cooperative Approaches (2017)Google Scholar

UNFCCC, Submission of Views by the Republic of Rwanda on Behalf of the Member States of the Central African Forestry Commission (COMIFAC) on APA Agenda Item 3 (2017)Google Scholar

UNFCCC, Synthesis Report on Information on Various Approaches in Enhancing the Cost-Effectiveness of, and Promoting, Mitigation Actions: Note by the Secretariat, FCCC/AWGLCA/2011/4 (30 March 2011)Google Scholar

UNFCCC, Synthesis Report on the Aggregate Effects of the Intended Nationally Determined Contributions: Note by the Secretariat, FCCC/CP/2015/7 (30 October 2015)Google Scholar

UNFCCC, Views on a Workplan for the Ad Hoc Working Group on the Durban Platform for Enhanced Action: Submissions from Parties, FCCC/ADP/2012/MISC.3 (30 April 2012)Google Scholar

UN-REDD Programme, Background Paper for the Expert Meeting: Options for Addressing Tenure under REDD+ (25–27 February 2013)Google Scholar

UN-REDD Programme, Framework Document (2008)Google Scholar

UN-REDD Programme, Harmonization of Readiness Components: Note by the Secretariat (October 2009), UN-REDD/PB3/7Google Scholar

UN-REDD Programme, Legal Companion to the UN-REDD Programme Guidelines on Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC): International Law and Jurisprudence Affirming the Requirement of FPIC (2013)Google Scholar

UN-REDD Programme, UN-REDD Programme Guidelines on Free, Prior and Informed Consent (2013)Google Scholar

UN-REDD Programme, UN-REDD Programme Operational Guidance: Engagement of Indigenous Peoples & Other Forest Dependent Communities (2009)Google Scholar

UN-REDD Programme and Forest Carbon Partnership Facility, Guidelines on Stakeholder Engagement in REDD+ Readiness with a Focus on the Participation of Indigenous peoples and Other Forest-Dependent Communities (20 April 2012)Google Scholar

UN-REDD Programme, Forest Tenure and Rights of Indigenous Peoples: Promoting Forest & Land Tenure Governance and the Rights of Indigenous Peoples & Forest Communities along REDD+ Implementation (1 June 2017, modified 4 July 2018)Google Scholar

UN-REDD Programme, UN-REDD Programme Strategic Framework 2016–2020Google Scholar

UN-REDD Programme, The UN-REDD Programme Strategy 2011–2015 (2011)Google Scholar

Voluntary Guidelines on the Responsible Governance of Tenure of Land, Fisheries, and Forests in the Context of National Food Security (Committee on World Food Security and the Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, 2012)Google Scholar

Working Paper on the Relationship and Distinction between the Rights of Persons Belonging to Minorities and Those of Indigenous Peoples, E/CN.4/Sub.2/2000/10 (19 July 2000)Google Scholar

The World Bank, Environmental and Social Framework (2017) pubdocs.worldbank.org/en/837721522762050108/Environmental-and-Social-Framework.pdfGoogle Scholar

The World Bank, Environmental and Social Standard 7: Indigenous Peoples/Sub-Sahara African Historically Underserved Traditional Local Communities (2017)Google Scholar

The World Bank, Operational Directive 4.20: Indigenous Peoples (September 1991)Google Scholar

The World Bank, Operational Policy 4.10: Indigenous Peoples (July 2005)Google Scholar

A REDD+ Jurisdictional Approach to Achieve Green Development in Indonesia (Bandan Pengelola REDD+, 2014)Google Scholar

Abrahamsen, R., ‘The power of partnerships in global governance’ (2004) 25(8) Third World Quarterly 1453–67Google Scholar

Ackerman, F., Biewald, B., White, D., Woolf, T., and Moomaw, W., ‘Grandfathering and coal plant emissions: The cost of cleaning up the Clean Air Act’ (1999) 27(15) Energy Policy 929–40Google Scholar

Adams, B. and Luchsinger, G., Climate Justice for a Changing Planet: A Primer for Policy Makers and NGOs (UN Non-Governmental Liaison Service, 2009)Google Scholar

Adelman, S., ‘Tropical forests and climate change: A critique of green governmentality’ (2015) 11(2) International Journal of Law in Context 195–212Google Scholar

Affolder, N., ‘A market for treaties’ (2010) 11(1) Chicago Journal of International Law 159–96Google Scholar

Affolder, N., ‘Transnational carbon contracting: Why law’s invisibility matters’ in Cutler, C. and Dietz, T. (eds.), The Politics of Private Transnational Governance by Contract (Routledge, 2017), pp. 215–236Google Scholar

Affolder, N., ‘Transnational conservation contracts’ (2012) 25(2) Leiden Journal of International Law 443–60Google Scholar

Affolder, N. A., ‘The private life of environmental treaties’ (2009) 103(3) American Journal of International Law 510–25Google Scholar

‘After Paris, UN’s new “light touch” role on markets to help spawn carbon clubs’, CarbonPulse, 15 December 2015 carbon-pulse.com/13415/Google Scholar

Agarwal, A. and Narain, S., Global Warming in an Unequal World: A Case for Environmental Colonialism (Global Network for Human Rights and the Environment, 1990)Google Scholar

Agrawal, A., ‘Environmentality: Community, intimate government, and the making of environmental subjects in Kumaon, India’ (2005) 46(2) Current Anthropology 161–90Google Scholar

Agrawal, A., Environmentality: Technologies of Government and the Making of Subjects (Duke University Press, 2005)Google Scholar

Agrawal, A. and Gibson, C. C., ‘Enchantment and disenchantment: The role of community in natural resource conservation’ (1999) 27(4) World Development 629–49Google Scholar

Agrawal, A. and Ostrom, E., ‘Collective action, property rights, and decentralisation in resource use in India and Nepal’ (2001) 29(4) Politics and Society 485–514Google Scholar

Alam, S., Atapattu, S., Gonzalez, C. G., and Razzaque, J. (eds.), International Environmental Law and the Global South (Cambridge University Press, 2015)Google Scholar

Alforte, A., Angan, J., Dentith, J., Domondon, K., Munden, L., Murday, S., and Pradela, L., Communities As Counterparties: Preliminary Review of Concessions and Conflict in Emerging and Frontier Market Concessions (Rights and Resources Initiative, 2014)Google Scholar

Aligica, P. D., Institutional Diversity and Political Economy: The Ostroms and Beyond (Oxford University Press, 2014)Google Scholar

Aligica, P. D. and Boettke, P. J., Challenging Institutional Analysis and Development: The Bloomington School (Routledge, 2009)Google Scholar

Aligica, P. D. and Boettke, P., ‘The social philosophy of Ostrom’s institutionalism’ (2010) 10–19 Working Paper, Mercatus Centre, George Mason UniversityGoogle Scholar

Aligica, P. D. and Tarko, V., ‘Polycentricity: From Polanyi to Ostrom, and beyond’ (2012) 25 Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 237–62Google Scholar

Allen, C. and Clouth, S., A Guidebook to the Green Economy – Issue 1: Green Economy, Green Growth and Low-Carbon Development – History, Definitions and a Guide to Recent Publications (UN–DESA, 2012)Google Scholar

Alley, P., ‘As the dust settles, some cause for optimism’ Global Witness blog, 2009, www.globalwitness.org/archive/dust-settles-some-cause-optimismGoogle Scholar

Althor, G., Watson, J. E., and Fuller, R. A., ‘Global mismatch between greenhouse gas emissions and the burden of climate change’ (2016) 6 Scientific Reports 20281Google Scholar

Anaya, S. J., ‘The capacity of international law to advance ethnic of nationality rights claims’ (1991) 13(3) Human Rights Quarterly 403–11Google Scholar

Anaya, S. J., ‘Divergent discourses about international law, indigenous peoples, and rights over land and natural resources: Towards a realist trend’ (2005) 16(2) Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law and Policy 237–58Google Scholar

Anaya, S. J., ‘Indigenous rights norms in contemporary international law’ (1991) 8 Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law 1–39Google Scholar

Anaya, S. J. and Puig, S., ‘Mitigating state sovereignty: The duty to consult with indigenous peoples’ (2017) 67(4) University of Toronto Law Journal 435–64Google Scholar

Anderson, K., ‘Global governance: The problematic legitimacy relationship between global civil society and the United Nations’ (2008) Working Paper No 2008-71, Washington College of LawGoogle Scholar

Anderson, P., Free, Prior, and Informed Consent in REDD+: Principles and Approaches for Policy and Project Development (RECOFTC (The Centre for People and Forests) and GIZ, 2011)Google Scholar

Anderson, T. and Stone, K., Caught in the Net: How ‘Net-Zero Emissions’ Will Delay Real Climate Action and Drive Land Grabs (ActionAid International, 2015)Google Scholar

Andersson, J. and Westholm, E., ‘Closing the future: Environmental research and the management of conflicting future value orders’ (2019) 44(2) Science, Technology and Human Values 237–62Google Scholar

Andonova, L. B., Betsill, M. M., and Bulkeley, H., ‘Transnational climate governance’ (2009) 9(2) Global Environmental Politics 52–73Google Scholar

Angelis, M. D., The Beginning of History: Value Struggles and Global Capital (Pluto Press, 2007)Google Scholar

Angelsen, A., ‘The 3 REDD’1’s’ (2010) 16 Journal of Forest Economics 253–56Google Scholar

Angelsen, A., ‘How do we set the reference levels for REDD payments?’ in Angelsen, A. (ed.), Moving Ahead with REDD: Issues, Options and Implications (Center for International Forestry Research, 2008), pp. 53–63Google Scholar

Angelsen, A., ‘REDD+ as result‐based aid: General lessons and bilateral of Norway’ (2017) 21(2) Review of Development Economics 237–64Google Scholar

Angelsen, A., ‘REDD+: What Should Come Next?’ in Barrett, S., Carraro, C. and de Melo, J. (eds.), Towards a Workable and Effective Climate Regime (CEPR Press, 2016), pp. 405–21Google Scholar

Angelsen, A. (ed.), Moving Ahead with REDD: Issues, Options and Implications (Center for International Forestry Research, 2008)Google Scholar

Angelsen, A. (ed.), Realising REDD+: National Strategy and Policy Options (Center for International Forestry Research, 2009)Google Scholar

Angelsen, A. (ed.), Transforming REDD+: Lessons and New Directions (Center for International Forestry Research, 2018)Google Scholar

Angelsen, A. and Atmadja, S., ‘What is this book about?’ in Angelsen, A. (ed.), Moving Ahead with REDD: Issues, Options and Implications (Center for International Forestry Research, 2008), pp. 1–9Google Scholar

Angelsen, A., Boucher, D., Brown, S., Merckx, V., Streck, C., and Zarin, D., Guidelines for REDD+ Reference Levels: Principles and Recommendations. Prepared for the Government of Norway (Meridian Institute, 2011)Google Scholar

Angelsen, A., Brockhaus, M., Duchelle, A. E., Larson, A. M., Martius, C., Sunderlin, W. D., Verchot, L. V., Wong, G., and Wunder, S., ‘Learning from REDD+: A response to Fletcher et al.’ (2017) 31(3) Conservation Biology 718–20Google Scholar

Angelsen, A., Brockhaus, M., Sunderlin, W. D., and Verchot, L. V. (eds.), Analysing REDD+: Challenges and Choices (Center for International Forestry Research, 2012)Google Scholar

Anghie, A., ‘Civilisation and commerce: The concept of governance in historical perspective’ (2000) 45 Villanova Law Review 887–912Google Scholar

Anghie, A., ‘“The heart of my home”: Colonialism, environmental damage, and the Nauru case’ (1993) 34(1) Harvard International Law Journal 445–506Google Scholar

Anghie, A., Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2007)Google Scholar

Anghie, A. and Chimni, B. S., ‘Third World approaches to international law and individual responsibility in internal conflicts’ (2003) 2(1) Chinese Journal of International Law 77–103Google Scholar

Argyrou, V., The Logic of Environmentalism: Anthropology, Ecology and Postcoloniality (Berghahn Books, 2005)Google Scholar

Armitage, D., ‘Governance and the commons in a multi-level world’ (2008) 2(1) International Journal of the Commons 7–32Google Scholar

Arnold, L., ‘Deforestation in decentralised Indonesia: What’s law got to do with it?’ (2008) 4(2) Law, Environment and Development Journal 75–101Google Scholar

At a Crossroads: Consequential Trends in Recognition of Community-Based Forest Tenure from 2002–2017 (Rights and Resources Initiative, 2018)Google Scholar

Atapattu, S., Human Rights Approaches to Climate Change: Challenges and Opportunities (Routledge, 2015)Google Scholar

Atapattu, S. and Gonzalez, C. G., ‘The North–South divide in international environmental law: Framing the issues’ in Alam, S., Atapattu, S., Gonzalez, C. G., and Razzaque, J. (eds.), International Environmental Law and the Global South (Cambridge University Press, 2015), pp. 1–20Google Scholar

Austin, J. L., How to Do Things with Words (Oxford University Press, 1975)Google Scholar

Australian Aid: Promoting Growth and Stability – A White Paper on the Australian Government’s Overseas Aid Program (Australian Government AusAID, 2006)Google Scholar

Awono, A., Somorin, O. A., Atyi, R. E., and Levang, P., ‘Tenure and participation in local REDD+ projects: Insights from southern Cameroon’ (2014) 35 Environmental Science & Policy 76–86Google Scholar

Background Analysis of REDD Regulatory Frameworks (Baker & McKenzie, 2009)Google Scholar

Backram, H., ‘Climate fraud and carbon colonialism: The new trade in greenhouse gases’ (2004) 15(4) Capitalism, Nature, Socialism 5–20Google Scholar

Bäckstand, K. and Lövbrand, E., ‘Planting trees to mitigate climate change: Contested discourses of ecological modernisation, Green governmentality and civic environmentalism’ (2006) 6(1) Global Environmental Politics 50–75Google Scholar

Baer, P., Fieldman, G., Athanasiou, T., and Kartha, S., ‘Greenhouse development rights: Towards an equitable framework for global climate policy’ (2008) 21(4) Cambridge Review of International Affairs 649–69Google Scholar

Bailey, I., Gouldson, A., and Newell, P., ‘Ecological modernisation and the governance of carbon: A critical analysis’ (2011) 43(3) Antipode 682–703Google Scholar

Banerjee, S. B., ‘Who sustains whose development? Sustainable development and the reinvention of nature’ (2003) 24(1) Organisation Studies 143–80Google Scholar

Barletti, J. P. S. and Larson, A. M., Rights Abuse Allegations in the Context of REDD+ Readiness and Implementation: A Preliminary Review and Proposal for Moving Forward (Center for International Forestry Research, 2017)Google Scholar

Baroudy, E., ‘Why we should be more optimistic about forests and climate change’ The World Bank (blog), https://blogs.worldbank.org/climatechange/why-we-should-be-more-optimistic-about-forests-and-climate-change, 18 December 2017Google Scholar

Barr, C., Resosudarmo, I. A. P., Dermawan, A., McCarthy, J., Moeliono, M., and Setiono, B. (eds.), Decentralization of Forest Administration in Indonesia: Implications for Forest Sustainability, Economic Development and Community Livelihoods (Center for International Forestry Research, 2006)Google Scholar

Barry, D., Larson, A. M., and Colfer, C. J. P., ‘Forest tenure reform: An orphan with only uncles’ in Larson, A. M., Barry, D., Dahal, G. R., and Colfer, C. J. P. (eds.), Forests for People: Community Rights and Forest Tenure Reform (Earthscan, 2010), pp. 19–40Google Scholar

Baskin, J., ‘The impossible necessity of climate justice?’ (2009) 10(2) Melbourne Journal of International Law 424–38Google Scholar

Bates, G., Environmental Law in Australia, Ninth edition (LexisNexis, 2016)Google Scholar

Baxi, U., Law and Poverty: Critical Essays (NM Tripathi, 1988)Google Scholar

Bayon, R., Hawn, A., and Hamilton, K., Voluntary Carbon Markets: An International Business Guide to What They Are and How They Work (Earthscan, 2007)Google Scholar

Bedjaoui, M., Towards a New International Economic Order (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, 1979)Google Scholar

Benda‐Beckmann, F. von, ‘Legal pluralism and social justice in economic and political development’ (2001) 32(1) IDS Bulletin 46–56Google Scholar

Bernstein, S., The Compromise of Liberal Environmentalism (Columbia University Press, 2001)Google Scholar

Bernstein, S., Betsill, M., Hoffmann, M., and Paterson, M., ‘A tale of two Copenhagens: Carbon markets and climate governance’ (2010) 39(1) Millennium: Journal of International Studies 161–73Google Scholar

Bessa, A., ‘Traditional local communities: What lessons can be learnt at the international level from the experiences of Brazil and Scotland?’ (2015) 24(3) Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law 330–40Google Scholar

Betzold, C. and Flesken, A., ‘Indigenous peoples in international environmental negotiations: evidence from biodiversity and climate change’ in Kaime, T. (ed.), International Climate Change Law and Policy: Cultural Legitimacy in Adaptation and Mitigation (Routledge, 2014), pp. 63–83Google Scholar

Beyerlin, U. and Marauhn, T., International Environmental Law (Hart/Beck, Nomos, 2011)Google Scholar

Beymer-Farris, B. A. and Bassett, T. J., ‘The REDD menace: Resurgent protectionism in Tanzania’s mangrove forests’ (2012) 22(2) Global Environmental Change 332–41Google Scholar

Bhandary, R. R., ‘Trying to eat an elephant (again): Opportunities and challenges in international cooperative approaches of the Paris Agreement’ (2018) 12(3) Carbon & Climate Law Review 240–7Google Scholar

Bhatnagar, B. and Williams, A. C., ‘Introduction’ in Bhatnagar, B. and Williams, A. C. (eds.), Participatory Development and the World Bank: Potential Directions for Change (World Bank, 1992)Google Scholar

Biehl, J. and Eskerod, T., Vita: Life in a Zone of Social Abandonment (University of California Press, 2013)Google Scholar

Biermann, F., ‘“Common concern of humankind”: The emergence of a new concept of international environmental law’ (1996) 34(4) Archiv des Völkerrechts 426–81Google Scholar

Biniaz, S., ‘Comma but differentiated responsibilities: Punctuation and 30 other ways negotiators have resolved issues in the international climate change regime’ (2016) 6 Michigan Journal of Environmental & Administrative Law 37–63Google Scholar

Biniaz, S., ‘Common but differentiated responsibility: Remarks by Susan Biniaz’ (2002) 96 Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law) 359–63Google Scholar

The BioCarbon Fund Experience: Insights from Afforestation/Reforestation Clean Development Mechanism Projects (The World Bank, 2012)Google Scholar

Birrell, K., ‘“An essential ghost”: Indigeneity within the legal archive’ (2010) 33(1) Australian Feminist Law Journal 81–99Google Scholar

Birrell, K., Indigeneity: Before and Beyond the Law (Routledge, 2016)Google Scholar

Birrell, K. and Godden, L., ‘Benefits and sharing: realizing rights in REDD+’ (2018) 9(1) Journal of Human Rights and the Environment 6–31Google Scholar

Birrell, K., Godden, L., and Tehan, M., ‘Climate change and REDD+: Property as a prism for conceiving indigenous peoples’ engagement’ (2012) 3(2) Journal of Human Rights and the Environment 196–216Google Scholar

Bodansky, D., Durban Platform: Issues and Options for a 2015 Agreement (Centre for Climate and Energy Solutions, 2012)Google Scholar

Bodansky, D., The Durban Platform Negotiations: Goals and Options (Harvard Project on Climate Agreements, 2012)Google Scholar

Bodansky, D., ‘A tale of two architectures: The once and future UN climate change regime’ (2011) 43 Arizona State Law Journal 697–712Google Scholar

Bodansky, D., ‘The Paris climate change agreement: A new hope?’ (2016) 110(2) American Journal of International Law 288–319Google Scholar

Bodansky, D., Brunnée, J., and Rajamani, L., International Climate Change Law (Oxford University Press, 2017)Google Scholar

Bodin, B., Vaananen, E., and van Asselt, H., ‘Putting REDD+ environmental safeguards into practice: Recommendations for effective and country-specific implementation’ (2015) 2 Carbon & Climate Law Review 168–82Google Scholar

Boehnert, J., ‘The green economy: Reconceptualising the natural commons as natural capital’ (2015) 10(4) Environmental Communication 395–417Google Scholar

Böhm, S., ‘How emissions trading at Paris climate talks has set us up for failure’, The Conversation, 15 December 2015 theconversation.com/how-emissions-trading-at-paris-climate-talks-has-set-us-up-for-failure-52319Google Scholar

Böhm, S. and Dabhi, S. (eds.), Upsetting the Offset: The Political Economy of Carbon Markets (MayFly Books, 2009)Google Scholar

Bond, P., Politics of Climate Justice: Paralysis Above, Movement Below (University of KwaZulu-Natal Press, 2012)Google Scholar

Borras, S. M., Competing Views and Strategies on Agrarian Reform: International Perspective (Ateneo de Manila University Press, 2008)Google Scholar

Borras, S. and Franco, J., ‘From threat to opportunity? Problems with the idea of a “code of conduct” for land-grabbing’ (2010) 13 Yale Human Rights and Development Law Journal 507–23Google Scholar

Borras, S. M. Jr., McMichael, P., and Scoones, I., ‘The politics of biofuels, land and agrarian change: Editors’ introduction’ (2010) 37(4) The Journal of Peasant Studies 575–92Google Scholar

Bortscheller, M. J., ‘Equitable but ineffective: How the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities hobbles the global fight against climate change’ (2009) 10 Sustainable Development Law & Policy 49–69Google Scholar

Bosselmann, K., ‘The right to self-determination and international environmental law: An integrative approach’ (1997) 1 New Zealand Journal of Environmental Law 1–40Google Scholar

Bowman, M. and Minas, S., ‘Resilience through interlinkage: The green climate fund and climate finance governance’ (2019) 19(3) Climate Policy 342–53Google Scholar

Boyd, E., Boykoff, M., and Newell, P., ‘The “new” carbon economy: What’s new?’ (2011) 43(3) Antipode 601–11Google Scholar

Boyd, E., Hultman, N., Roberts, J. T., Corbera, E., Cole, J., Bozmoski, A., Ebeling, J., Tippman, R., Mann, P., Brown, K., and Liverman, D. M., ‘Reforming the CDM for sustainable development: Lessons learned and policy futures’ (2009) 12 Environmental Science and Policy 820–31Google Scholar

Boyd, W., ‘Climate change, fragmentation, and the challenges of global environmental law: Elements of a post-Copenhagen assemblage’ (2010) 32 University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law 457–550Google Scholar

Boyd, W., ‘Ways of seeing in environmental law: How deforestation became an object of climate governance’ (2010) 37 Ecology Law Quarterly 843–916Google Scholar

Boyd, W., Stickler, C., Duchelle, A. E., Seymour, F., Nepstad, D., Bahar, N. H. A., and Rodriguez-Ward, D., Ending Tropical Deforestation: A Stocktake of Progress and Challenges. Jurisdictional Approaches to REDD+ and Low Emissions Development: Progress and Prospects (World Resources Institute and Laboratory for Energy and Environmental Policy Innovation, 2018)Google Scholar

Braithwaite, J. P., ‘Standard form contracts as transnational law: Evidence from the derivatives markets’ (2012) 75(5) The Modern Law Review 779–805Google Scholar

Brand, U., Bullard, N., Lander, E., and Mueller, T. (eds.), Contours of Climate Justice: Ideas for Shaping New Climate and Energy Policies (Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation, 2009)Google Scholar

Brand, U. and Sekler, N. (eds.), Postneoliberalism – A Beginning Debate (The Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation, 2009)Google Scholar

Brand, U. and Sekler, N. (eds.), ‘Postneoliberalism: Catch-all word or valuable analytical and political concept? – Aims of a beginning debate’ in Brand, U. and Sekler, N. (eds.), Postneoliberalism – A Beginning Debate (The Dag Hammarskjöld Foundation, 2009), pp. 5–15Google Scholar

Breidenich, C., Magrow, D., Rowley, A., and Rubin, J. W., ‘The Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change’ (1998) 92(2) American Journal of International Law 315–31Google Scholar

Briefing note: Unpacking the Warsaw Framework for REDD+: The requirements for implementing REDD+ under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (Climate Law and Policy, 2014)Google Scholar

Brockhaus, M., Korhonen-Kurki, K., Sehring, J., Di Gregorio, M., Assembe-Mvondo, S., Babon, A., Bekele, M., Gebara, M. F., Khatri, D. B., and Kambire, H., ‘REDD+, transformational change and the promise of performance-based payments: A qualitative comparative analysis’ (2017) 17(6) Climate Policy 708–30Google Scholar

Brockington, D., ‘A radically conservative vision? The challenge of UNEP’s towards a green economy’ (2012) 43(1) Development and Change 409–22Google Scholar

Broder, J. M., ‘U.S. climate envoy’s good cop, bad cop roles’ New York Times, 10 December 2009, www.nytimes.com/2009/12/11/science/earth/11stern.htmlGoogle Scholar

Bromley, D. W. and Cernea, M. M., The Management of Common Property Natural Resources (The World Bank, 1989)Google Scholar

Brown, D., Schreckenberg, K., Shepherd, G., and Wells, A., Forestry As an Entry Point for Governance Reform (Overseas Development Instituted Forestry Briefing, 2002)Google Scholar

Brown, D., Seymour, F., and Peskett, L., ‘How do we achieve REDD co-benefits and avoid doing harm?’ in Angelsen, A. (ed.), Moving Ahead with REDD: Issues, Options and Implications (Center for International Forestry Research, 2008), pp. 107–18Google Scholar

Brown, M. L., Redeeming REDD+: Policies, Incentives, and Social Feasibility for Avoided Deforestation (Routledge and Earthscan, 2013)Google Scholar

Brown, W., ‘“The most we can hope for…”: Human rights and the politics of fatalism’ (2004) 103(2/3) The South Atlantic Quarterly 451–63Google Scholar

Brown, W., Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution (Zone Books, 2015)Google Scholar

Brundtland Commission Report, Our Common Future World Commission on Environment and Development (Cambridge University Press, 1987)Google Scholar

Brunnée, J., ‘Common areas, common heritage, and common concern’ in Bodansky, D., Brunnée, J., and Hey, E. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of International Environmental Law (Oxford University Press, 2008)Google Scholar

Brunnée, J., ‘“Common interest” echoes from an empty shell?: Some thoughts on common interest and international environmental law’ (1989) 49 Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 791–808Google Scholar

Brunnée, J., ‘A conceptual framework for an international forests convention: Customary law and emerging principles’ in Canadian Council of International Law (ed.), Global Forests and International Environmental Law (Kluwer Law, 1996), pp. 41–77Google Scholar

Brunnée, J., ‘International environmental law: Rising to the challenge of common concern?’ (2006) 100 Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law) 307–10Google Scholar

Brunnée, J. and Streck, C., ‘The UNFCCC as a negotiation forum: Towards common but more differentiated responsibilities’ (2013) 13(5) Climate Policy 589–607Google Scholar

Bruno, L., ‘Why has critique run out of steam? From matters of fact to matters of concern’ (2004) 30 Critical Inquiry 225–48Google Scholar

Bryant, G., ‘Climate change: Back to the market or…?’ Progress in Political Economy, 24 November 2014 ppesydney.net/climate-change-back-to-the-market-orGoogle Scholar

Buchanan, R. and Pahuja, S., ‘Legal imperialism: Empire’s invisible hand?’ in Passavant, P. A. and Dean, J. (eds.), Empire’s New Clothes: Reading Hardt and Negri (Routledge, 2004), pp. 73–93Google Scholar

Bulkeley, H., Andonova, L. B., Betsill, M. M., Compagnon, D., Hale, T., Hoffman, M. J., Newell, P., Peterson, M., Roger, C., and Vandveer, S. D., Transnational Climate Change Governance (Cambridge University Press, 2014)Google Scholar

Bullard, N. and Müller, T., ‘Beyond the “green economy”: System change, not climate change?’ (2012) 55(1) Development 54–62Google Scholar

Bullock, S., Childs, M., and Picken, T., A Dangerous Distraction: Why Offsetting Is Failing the Climate and People: The Evidence (Friends of the Earth England, Wales and Northern Ireland, 2009)Google Scholar

Bumpus, A. G. and Liverman, D. M., ‘Accumulation by decarbonization and the governance of carbon offsets’ (2008) 84(2) Economic Geography 127–55Google Scholar

Bumpus, A. G. and Liverman, D. M., ‘Carbon colonialism? Offsets, greenhouse gas reductions, and sustainable development’ in Peet, R., Robbins, P., and Watts, M. J. (eds.) Global Political Ecology (Routledge, 2011), pp. 203–24Google Scholar

Burke, A., Fishel, S., Mitchell, A., Dalby, S., and Levine, D. J., ‘Planet politics: A manifesto from the end of IR’ (2016) 44(3) Millennium: Journal of International Studies 499–523Google Scholar

Burkett, M., ‘Small island states and the Paris Agreement’ Wilson Center, 21 December 2015, www.wilsoncenter.org/article/small-island-states-and-the-paris-agreementGoogle Scholar

Burki, S. J. and Perry, G. E., Beyond the Washington Consensus: Institutions Matter (The World Bank, 1998)Google Scholar

Büscher, B., ‘Nature on the move I: The value and circulation of liquid nature and the emergence of fictitious conservation’ (2013) 6(1–2) New Proposals: Journal of Marxism and Interdisciplinary Inquiry 20–36Google Scholar

Butler, J., Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity (Routledge, 1990)Google Scholar

Butler, J. and Athanasiou, A., Dispossession: The Performative in the Political (Polity, 2013)Google Scholar

Butt, S., Lyster, R., and Stephens, T., Climate Change and Forest Governance: Lessons from Indonesia (Routledge, 2015)Google Scholar

Caffentzis, G., ‘The future of “the commons”: Neoliberalism’s “Plan B” or the original disaccumulation of capital?’ (2010) 69 New Formations 23–41Google Scholar

Caffentzis, G., ‘A tale of two conferences: Globalization, the crisis of neoliberalism and question of the commons’ (2004), www.globaljusticecenter.org/papers/caffentzis.htmGoogle Scholar

Caffentzis, G. and Federici, S., ‘Commons against and beyond capitalism’ (2014) 49 Community Development Journal 92–105Google Scholar

Callon, M., ‘Civilizing markets: Carbon trading between in vitro and in vivo experiments’ (2009) 34(3–4) Accounting, Organizations and Society 535–48Google Scholar

Cameron, J., ‘Forests’ (1991) 1 Yearbook of International Environmental Law 201Google Scholar

Cames, M., Harthan, R. O., Füssler, J., Lazarus, M., Lee, C. M., Erickson, P., and Spalding-Fecher, R., How Additional Is the Clean Development Mechanism? Analysis of the Application of Current Tools and Proposed Alternatives (DG CLIMA, 2016)Google Scholar

Campbell, D., Klaes, M., and Bignell, C., ‘After Copenhagen: The impossibility of carbon trading’ (2010) 22 London School of Economics Law, Society and Economy Working PapersGoogle Scholar

Caney, S., ‘Cosmopolitan justice, responsibility, and global climate change’ (2005) 18 Leiden Journal of International Law 747–75Google Scholar

Carbon Credit Fraud: The White Collar Crime of the Future (Deloitte, 2009)Google Scholar

‘Carbon finance: The role of the World Bank in carbon trading markets’, Bretton Woods Project, 26 September 2018, www.brettonwoodsproject.org/2018/09/carbon-finance-role-world-bank-carbon-trading-markets/Google Scholar

Carbon Markets 101: The Ultimate Guide to Carbon Offsetting Mechanisms (Carbon Market Watch, 2019)Google Scholar

Carbon Pricing Watch 2016: An Advanced Brief from the State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2016 Report, to be released in 2016 (The World Bank Group and ECOFYS, 2015)Google Scholar

Carlson, D. G., ‘How to do things with Hegel’ (1999) 78 Texas Law Review 1377–97Google Scholar

Carr, C. and Rosembuj, F., ‘World Bank experiences in contracting for emission reductions’ (2007) 2 Environmental Liability 114–19Google Scholar

Carroll, T., ‘Introduction: Neo-liberal development policy in Asia and beyond the post-Washington consensus’ (2012) 42(3) Journal of Contemporary Asia 350–8Google Scholar

Carry-Over of AAUs from the CP1 to CP2 – Future Implications for the Climate Regime (Point Carbon, 2012)Google Scholar

Castree, N. and Henderson, G., ‘The capitalist mode of conservation, neoliberalism and the ecology of value’ (2014) 7(1) New Proposals: Journal of Marxism and Interdisciplinary Inquiry 16–37Google Scholar

Caught REDD Handed: How Indonesia’s Logging Moratorium Was Criminally Compromised on Day One and Norway Will Profit (Environmental Investigation Agency (EIA) and Telapak, 2011)Google Scholar

Chakrabarty, D., ‘Planetary crises and the difficulty of being modern’ (2018) 46(3) Millennium: Journal of International Studies 259–82Google Scholar

Chandler, D., Empire in Denial: The Politics of State-Building (Pluto Press, 2006)Google Scholar

Chapman, S., Wilder, M., and Millar, I., ‘Defining the legal elements of benefit sharing in the context of REDD’ (2014) 4 Carbon & Climate Law Review 270–81Google Scholar

Charters, C. and Stavenhagen, R. (eds.), Making the Declaration Work: The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs, 2009)Google Scholar

Chatterjee, P., The Politics of the Governed; Reflections on Popular Politics in Most of the World (Columbia University Press, 2004)Google Scholar

Chatterton, P., Featherstone, D., and Routledge, P., ‘Articulating climate justice in Copenhagen: Antagonism, the commons, and solidarity’ (2013) 45(3) Antipode 602–20Google Scholar

Childs, M., ‘Privatising the atmosphere: A solution or dangerous con?’ (2012) 12(1/2) Ephemera: Theory and Politics in Organisation 12–18Google Scholar

Chimni, B., ‘Third world approaches to international law: A manifesto’ (2006) 8 International Community Law Review 3–27Google Scholar

Chomba, S., Kariuki, J., Lund, J. F., and Sinclair, F., ‘Roots of inequity: How the implementation of REDD+ reinforces past injustices’ (2016) 50 Land Use Policy 202–13Google Scholar

Ciplet, D. and Roberts, J. T., ‘Climate change and the transition to neoliberal environmental governance’ (2017) 46 Global Environmental Change 148–56Google Scholar

Ciplet, D., Roberts, J. T., and Khan, M. R., Power in a Warming World: The New Global Politics of Climate Change and the Remaking of Environmental Inequality (MIT Press, 2015)Google Scholar

Clark, C. and Page, J., ‘Of protest, the commons, and customary public rights: An ancient tale of the lawful forest’ (2019) 42(1) University of New South Wales Law Journal 26–59Google Scholar

Clifton, S.-J., A Dangerous Obsession: The Evidence against Carbon Trading and for Real Solutions to Avoid a Climate Crunch (Friends of the Earth England, Wales and Northern Ireland, 2009)Google Scholar

Climate Change, Carbon Markets and the CDM: A Call to Action. Report of the High-Level Panel on the CDM Policy Dialogue (2012)Google Scholar

Climate Debt: A Primer (Third World Network, 2009)Google Scholar

Coase, R. H., ‘The nature of the firm’ (1937) 4(16) Economica 386–405Google Scholar

Coase, R. H., ‘The problem of social cost’ (1960) 3 The Journal of Law and Economics 1–44Google Scholar

Coen, D. R., Climate in Motion: Science, Empire, and the Problem of Scale (University of Chicago Press, 2018)Google Scholar

Cohen, M. R., ‘The basis of contract’ (1933) 46(4) Harvard Law Review 553–92Google Scholar

Cohen, M. R., ‘Property and sovereignty’ (1927) 13 Cornell Law Quarterly 8–30Google Scholar

Colchester, M., Beyond Tenure: Rights-Based Approaches to Peoples and Forests. Some Lessons from the Forest Peoples Programme (Forest Peoples Programme, 2007)Google Scholar

Colchester, M., Apte, T., Laforge, M., Mandondo, A., and Pathak, N., Learning Lessons from International Community Forestry Networks: Synthesis Report (Center for International Forestry Research, 2003)Google Scholar

Coleman, L. M., ‘The making of docile dissent: Neoliberalism and resistance in Columbia and beyond’ (2013) 7(2) International Political Sociology 170–87Google Scholar

Conant, J., ‘Do trees grow on money?’ (2011) Earth Island Journal, www.earthisland.org/journal/index.php/magazine/entry/do_trees_grow_on_moneyGoogle Scholar

Consolidation Report: Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Indonesia (Ministry of Forestry of the Republic of Indonesia, 2008)Google Scholar

Cooke, B. and Kothari, U. (eds.), Participation: The New Tyranny? (Zed Books, 2001)Google Scholar

Cooper, M., Family Values: Between Neoliberalism and the New Social Conservatism (MIT Press, 2017)Google Scholar

Cooper, M. E., Life As Surplus: Biotechnology and Capitalism in the Neoliberal Era (University of Washington Press, 2008)Google Scholar

Corbera, E., ‘Problematizing REDD+ as an experiment in payments for ecosystem services’ (2012) 4(6) Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 612–19Google Scholar

Corbera, E., Estrada, M., and Brown, K., ‘Reducing greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in developing countries: Revisiting the assumptions’ (2010) 100 Climatic Change 355–88Google Scholar

Corbera, E., Estrada, M., May, P., Navarro, G., and Pacheco, P., ‘Rights to land, forests and carbon in REDD+: Insights from Mexico, Brazil and Costa Rica’ (2011) 2(1) Forests 301–42Google Scholar

Cordonier Segger, M.-C., Gehring, M., and Wardell, A., ‘REDD+ instruments, international investment rules and sustainable landscapes’ in Voigt, C. (ed.), Research Handbook on REDD-Plus and International Law (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2016)Google Scholar

Cornwall, A., ‘Unpacking “participation”: Models, meanings and practices’ (2008) 43(3) Community Development Journal 269–83Google Scholar

Corriveau-Bourque, A., Almeida, F., and Frechette, A., Uncertainty and Opportunity: The Status of Forest Carbon Rights and Governance Frameworks in Over Half of the World’s Tropical Forests (Rights and Resources Initiative, 2018)Google Scholar

Cosbey, A., Parry, J.-E., Browne, J., Babu, Y. D., Bhandari, P., Drexhage, J., and Murphy, D., Realizing the Development Dividend: Making the CDM Work for Developing Countries (International Institute for Sustainable Development, 2005)Google Scholar

Costenbader, J., Legal Frameworks for REDD – Design and Implementation at the National Level (International Union for Conservation of Nature, 2009)Google Scholar

Costenbader, J., REDD+ benefit sharing: A comparative assessment of three national policy approaches (Forest Carbon Partnership Facility and UN-REDD Programme, 2011)Google Scholar

Cotula, L. and Mayers, J., Tenure in REDD – Start-Point or Afterthought? (International Institute for Environment and Development, 2009)Google Scholar

Coulthard, G. S., Red Skin, White Masks: Rejecting the Colonial Politics of Recognition (University of Minnesota Press, 2014)Google Scholar

Cover, R. M., ‘Foreword: Nomos and narrative’ (1983) 97 Harvard Law Review 4–68Google Scholar

Cowling, P., REDD+ Market: Sending Out an SOS (Conservation International, 2013)Google Scholar

Craven, M., ‘Colonisation and domination’ in Fassbender, B. and Peters, A. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the History of International Law (Oxford University Press, 2012), p. 888Google Scholar

Cronon, W., ‘The trouble with wilderness; or, getting back to the wrong nature’ in Cronon, W. (ed.), Uncommon Ground: Rethinking the Human Place in Nature (W. W. Norton & Company, 1995), pp. 69–90Google Scholar

Crutzen, P. J., ‘Geology of mankind’ (2002) 415 Nature 23Google Scholar

Cullet, P., Differential Treatment in International Environmental Law (Ashgate, 2003)Google Scholar

Cullet, P., ‘Differential treatment in environmental law: Addressing critiques and conceptualizing the next steps’ (2016) 5(2) Transnational Environmental Law 305–28Google Scholar

Cullet, P., ‘Differential treatment in international law: Towards a new paradigm of inter-state relations’ (1999) 10(3) European Journal of International Law 549–82Google Scholar

Cullet, P., ‘Principle 7–common but differentiated responsibilities’ in Viñuales, J. (ed.), The Rio Declaration on Environment and Development: A Commentary (Oxford University Press, 2015), pp. 229–44Google Scholar

Cutler, C. and Dietz, T., ‘The politics of private transnational governance by contract: Introduction and analytical framework’ in Cutler, C. and Dietz, T. (eds.), The Politics of Private Transnational Governance by Contract (Routledge, 2017), pp. 1–36Google Scholar

D’Alisa, G., Demaria, F., and Kallis, G., Degrowth: A Vocabulary for a New Era (Routledge, 2014)Google Scholar

Daes, E.-I. A., ‘Some considerations on the right of indigenous peoples to self-determination’ (1993) 3 Transnational Law & Contemporary Problems 1–11Google Scholar

Daes, E.-I. A., Indigenous Peoples: Keepers of Our Past, Custodians of our Future (International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs, 2008)Google Scholar

Dales, J. H., Pollution, Property and Prices: An Essay in Policy-Making and Economics (University of Toronto Press, 1968)Google Scholar

Davenport, D. S., ‘An alternative explanation for the failure of the UNCED forest negotiations’ (2005) 5(1) Global Environmental Politics 105–30Google Scholar

Davies, M., Property: Meanings, Histories, Theories (Routledge, 2007)Google Scholar

Davies, M., Asking the Law Question, Fourth edition (Thomson Reuters, 2017)Google Scholar

Davies, M., ‘The consciousness of trees’ (2015) 27(2) Law & Literature 217–35Google Scholar

Daviet, F. and Larsen, G., Safeguarding Forests and People: A Framework for Designing a National System to Implement REDD+ Safeguards (World Resources Initiative, 2012)Google Scholar

Davis, C., Williams, L., Lupberger, S., and Daviet, F., Assessing Forest Governance: The Governance of Forests Initiative Indicator Framework (World Resources Institute, 2013)Google Scholar

Davis, K. E., Kingsbury, B., and Merry, S. E., ‘Indicators as a technology of global governance’ (2010) 46(1) Law & Society Review 71–104Google Scholar

Davis, M., ‘Indigenous struggles in standard-setting: The United Nations declaration on the rights of indigenous peoples’ (2008) 9(2) Melbourne Journal of International Law 439–71Google Scholar

Dawson, A., ‘Climate justice: The emerging movement against green capitalism’ (2010) 109(2) South Atlantic Quarterly 313–38Google Scholar

de Águeda Corneloup, I. and Mol, A. P., ‘Small island developing states and international climate change negotiations: The power of moral “leadership”’ (2014) 14(1) International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 281–97Google Scholar

de la Cadena, M. and Blaser, M., A World of Many Worlds (Duke University Press, 2018)Google Scholar

de Campos Mello, V., North–South Conflicts and Power Distribution in UNCED Negotiations: The Case of Forestry (International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, 1993)Google Scholar

De Lucia, V. ‘Competing narratives and complex genealogies: The ecosystem approach in international environmental law’ (2015) 27(1) Journal of Environmental Law 91–117Google Scholar

de Soto, H. The Mystery of Capital: Why Capitalism Triumphs in the West and Fails Everywhere Else (Black Swan, 2000)Google Scholar

Dehm, J., ‘Carbon colonialism or climate justice?: Interrogating the international climate regime from a TWAIL perspective’ (2016) 33 Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice 129–161Google Scholar

Dehm, J., ‘“REDD faces all around”: Implementing reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in Indonesia’ (2012) 10 Local–Global 98–125Google Scholar

Dehm, J., ‘International law, temporalities and narratives of the climate crisis’ (2016) 4(1) London Review of International Law 167–93Google Scholar

Dehm, J., ‘The misery of international law: Confrontations with injustice in the global economy’ (2018) 19 Melbourne Journal of International Law 763–72Google Scholar

Dehm, J., ‘One tonne of carbon dioxide equivalent (1tCO₂e)’ in Hohmann, J. and Joyce, D. (eds.), International Law’s Objects (Oxford University Press, 2018), pp. 305–18Google Scholar

Dehm, J., ‘Post Paris reflections: Fossil fuels, human rights and the need to excavate new ideas for climate justice’ (2017) 8(2) Journal of Human Rights and the Environment 280–300Google Scholar

Dehm, J., ‘Reflections on Paris: Thoughts towards a critical approach to climate law’ (2018) Revue québécoise de droit international 61–91Google Scholar

Dehm, J., ‘Tricks of perception and perspective: The disappearance of law and politics in carbon markets; Reading Alexandre Kossoy and Phillippe Ambrosi, “State and trends of the carbon market 2010”’ (2011) 7(2) Macquarie Journal of International and Comparative Environmental Law 1–18Google Scholar

Dehm, J., ‘Rupture and continuity: North/south struggles over debt and economic cooperation at the end of the cold war’ in Craven, M., Pahuja, S., and Simpson, G. (eds.), International Law and the Cold War (Cambridge University Press, 2020), pp. 287–314Google Scholar

Dehm, J. and Hasan Khan, A., ‘North–South transboundary movement of hazardous wastes: The Basel ban and environmental justice’ in Cullet, P. and Koonan, S. (eds.), Research Handbook on Law, Environment and the Global South (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2019), pp. 109–37Google Scholar

Dehm, S., ‘Framing international migration’ (2015) 3(1) London Review of International Law 133–68Google Scholar

Deininger, K., Land Policies for Growth and Poverty Reduction (The World Bank, 2003)Google Scholar

Deininger, K. and Bisswanger, H., ‘The evolution of the World Bank’s land policy: Principles, experience and future challenges’ (1999) 14(2) The World Bank Research Observer 247–76Google Scholar

Deleuil, T., ‘The common but differentiated responsibilities principle: Changes in continuity after the Durban Conference of the Parties’ (2012) 21(3) Review of European Community & International Environmental Law 271–81Google Scholar

Demaria, F. and Kothari, A., ‘The post-development dictionary agenda: Paths to the pluriverse’ (2017) 38(12) Third World Quarterly 2588–99Google Scholar

Denier, L., Korwin, S., Leggett, M., and MacFarquhar, C., The Little Book of Legal Frameworks for REDD+ (Global Canopy Programme, 2014)Google Scholar

Dickson, B., Bertzky, M., Christophersen, T., Epple, C., Kapos, V., Miles, L., Narloch, U., and Trumper, K., REDD+ Beyond Carbon: Supporting Decisions on Safeguards and Multiple Benefits (UN-REDD Programme, Policy Brief: Issue No 2, 2012)Google Scholar

Dietrich, C. R., Oil Revolution (Cambridge University Press, 2017)Google Scholar

Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., and Stern, P. C., ‘The struggle to govern the commons’ (2003) 302(5652) Science 1907–12Google Scholar

DiLeva, C., ‘Common but differentiated responsbility: Remarks by Charles E. DiLeva’ (2002) 96 Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law) 363–6Google Scholar

Doherty, E. and Schroeder, H., ‘Forest tenure and multi-level governance in avoiding deforestation under REDD’ (2011) 11(4) Global Environmental Politics 66–87Google Scholar

Dooley, K., An Overview of Selected REDD Proposals (FERN and Forest Peoples Programme, 2008)Google Scholar

Dooley, K., Griffiths, T., Leake, H., and Ozinga, S., Cutting Corners: World Bank’s Forest and Carbon Fund Fails Forests and People (FERN and Forest Peoples’ Programme, 2008)Google Scholar

Dooley, K., Griffiths, T., Martone, F., and Ozinga, S., Smoke and Mirrors: A Critical Assessment of the Forest Carbon Partnership Facility (FERN and Forest Peoples’ Programme, 2011)Google Scholar

Dooley, K. and Gupta, A., ‘Governing by expertise: The contested politics of (accounting for) land-based mitigation in a new climate agreement’ (2017) 17(4) International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 483–500Google Scholar

Dooley, K. and Reisch, N., ‘Bonn II: REDD discussions at the June 2009 UNFCCC Climate Meeting’, EU Forest Watch July 2009, www.redd-monitor.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/document_4448_4450.pdfGoogle Scholar

Dorsett, S. and McVeigh, S., Jurisdiction (Routledge, 2012)Google Scholar

Dowie, M., Conservation Refugees: The Hundred-Year Conflict between Global Conservation and Native Peoples (MIT Press, 2009)Google Scholar

Doyle, A., ‘Space agencies, Google seek ways to save forests’, Reuters AlertNet, 20 October 2009, www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/LK385966.htmGoogle Scholar

Dressler, W., Büscher, B., Schoon, M., Brockington, D. A. N., Hayes, T., Kull, C. A., McCarthy, J., and Shrestha, K., ‘From hope to crisis and back again? A critical history of the global CBNRM narrative’ (2010) 37(1) Environmental Conservation 5–15Google Scholar

Driesen, D. M., ‘Free lunch or cheap fix: The emissions trading idea and the climate change convention’ (1998) 26 Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review 1–87Google Scholar

Dubash, N. K. and Rajamani, L., Beyond Copenhagen: Next steps (2010) 10(6) Climate Policy 593–9Google Scholar

Duchelle, A. E., Cromberg, M., Gebara, M. F., Guerra, R., Melo, T., Larson, A, Cronkleton, P., Börner, J., Sills, E., and Wunder, S., ‘Linking forest tenure reform, environmental compliance, and incentives: Lessons from REDD+ initiatives in the Brazilian Amazon’ (2014) 55 World Development 53–67Google Scholar

Duffield, M., Development, Security and Unending War: Governing the World of Peoples (Polity, 2007)Google Scholar

Durrant, N., ‘Legal issues in biosequestration: Carbon sinks, carbon rights and carbon trading’ (2008) 31(3) UNSW Law Journal 906–18Google Scholar

Dutschke, M. and Angelsen, A., ‘How do we ensure permanence and assign liability?’ in Angelsen, A. (ed.), Moving Ahead with REDD: Issues, Options and Implications (Center for International Forestry Research, 2008), pp. 77–85Google Scholar

Dutschke, M. and Michaelowa, A., ‘Development assistance and the CDM – How to interpret “financial additionality”’ (2006) 11(2) Environment and Development Economics 235–46Google Scholar

Duyck, S., ‘Delivering on the Paris promises? Review of the Paris Agreement’s implementing guidelines from a human rights perspective’ (2019) 9(3) Climate Law 202–23Google Scholar

The Ecologist, Whose Common Future? Reclaiming the Commons (Earthscan, 1993)Google Scholar

The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A Synthesis of the Approach, Conclusions and Recommendations of the TEEB (TEEB, 2010)Google Scholar

Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Current State and Trends, Vol 1 (The Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Board, 2005)Google Scholar

El-Ghoney, M.R., ‘Land reform development challenges of 1963–2003 continue into twenty-first Century’ FAO, www.fao.org/docrep/006/j0415t/j0415t05.htmGoogle Scholar

Eliasch, J., Climate Change: Financing Global Forests: The Eliasch Review (Earthscan, 2008)Google Scholar

Emerging Compliance Markets for REDD+: An Assessment of Supply and Demand (United States Agency for International Development, 2013)Google Scholar

Emissions Gap Report 2019 (United Nations Environment Programme, 2019)Google Scholar

Engaging the Private Sector in Results-Based Landscape Programs: Early Lessons from the World Bank’s Forests and Landscapes Climate Finance Funds (Forest Carbon Partnership Facility and BioCarbon Fund Initiative for Sustainable Forest Landscapes, 2017)Google Scholar

Engle, K., The Elusive Promise of Indigenous Development: Rights, Culture, Strategy (Duke University Press, 2010)Google Scholar

Engle, K., ‘Indigenous rights claims in international law: Self-determination, culture, and development’ in Armstrong, D. (ed.), Routledge Handbook of International Law (Routledge, 2009), pp. 331–43Google Scholar

Engle, K., ‘On fragile architecture: The UN declaration on the rights of indigenous peoples in the context of human rights’ (2011) 22(2) European Journal of International Law 141–63Google Scholar

Eni-Ibukun, T. A., International Environmental Law and Distributive Justice (Routledge, 2014)Google Scholar

Escobar, A., ‘Beyond the third world: Imperial globality, global coloniality and antiglobalisation social movements’ (2004) 25(1) Third World Quarterly 207–30Google Scholar

Eslava, L., ‘Decentralization of development and nation-building today: Reconstructing Colombia from the margins of Bogotá’ (2009) 2(1) The Law and Development Review 282–366Google Scholar

Eslava, L., ‘Istanbul vignettes: Observing the everyday operation of international law’ (2014) 2(1) London Review of International Law 3–47Google Scholar

Eslava, L., Local Space, Global Life: The Everyday Operation of International Law and Development (Cambridge University Press, 2015)Google Scholar

Eslava, L., ‘TWAIL coordinates’ Critical Legal Thinking, 2 April 2019 criticallegalthinking.com/2019/04/02/twail-coordinatesGoogle Scholar

Esrin, D. and Kennedy, H., Achieving Justice and Human Rights in an Era of Climate Disruption (International Bar Association, 2014)Google Scholar

‘EU carbon price volatility in January a sign of things to come’, S&P Global Platts Insight, 10 January 2019 blogs.platts.com/2019/01/10/eu-carbon-price-volatility-sign-of-things-to-come/Google Scholar

Evans, S. and Gabbatiss, J., ‘COP25: Key outcomes agreed at the UN climate talks in Madrid’ Carbon Brief, 15 December 2019, www.carbonbrief.org/cop25-key-outcomes-agreed-at-the-un-climate-talks-in-madridGoogle Scholar

Evans, S. and Timperley, J., ‘COP24: Key outcomes agreed at the UN climate talks in Katowice’ Carbon Brief, 16 December 2018, www.carbonbrief.org/cop24-key-outcomes-agreed-at-the-un-climate-talks-in-katowiceGoogle Scholar

Extreme carbon inequality (Oxfam Media Briefing, 2015)Google Scholar

Fair Shares: A Civil Society Equity Review of INDCS. Report (CSO Equity Review Coalition, 2015)Google Scholar

Fairhead, J., Leach, M., and Scoones, I., ‘Green grabbing: A new appropriation of nature?’ (2012) 39(2) The Journal of Peasant Studies 237–61Google Scholar

The FCPF Carbon Fund: Piloting REDD+ Programs at Scale (Forest Carbon Partnership Fund, June 2013), www.forestcarbonpartnership.org/sites/fcp/files/2013/june2013/CF%20Origination-web_0.pdfGoogle Scholar

Fearnside, P., ‘Environmentalists split over Kyoto and Amazon deforestation’ (2001) 28(4) Environmental Conservation 295–9Google Scholar

Federici, S., ‘From commoning to debt: Financialization, microcredit, and the changing architecture of capital accumulation’ (2014) 113(2) The South Atlantic Quarterly 231–44Google Scholar

Felli, R., ‘On climate rent’ (2014) 22(2–3) Historical Materialism 251–80Google Scholar

Ferguson, J., The Anti-Politics Machine: ‘Development,’ Depolitization, and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho (Cambridge University Press, 1990)Google Scholar

Ferguson, P., Post-Growth Politics: A Critical Theoretical and Policy Framework for Decarbonisation (Springer International Publishing, 2018)Google Scholar

Fisher, R. and Lyster, R., ‘Land and resource tenure: The rights of indigenous people and forest dwellers’ in Lyster, R., MacKenzie, C., and McDermott, C. (eds.), Law, Tropical Forests and Carbon: The Case of REDD+ (Cambridge University Press, 2013), pp. 187–206Google Scholar

Fishman, A., Oliveira, E., and Gamble, L., Tackling Deforestation through a Jurisdictional Approach: Lessons from the Field (World Wide Fund for Nature, 2017)Google Scholar

Fitzpatrick, D., ‘“Best practice” options for the legal recognition of customary tenure’ (2005) 36(3) Development and Change 449–75Google Scholar

Flaman, R., Decentralisation: A Sampling of Definitions (United Nations Development Programme Working Paper, 1999)Google Scholar

Fletcher, R., ‘Against wilderness’ (2009) 5(1) Green Theory & Praxis: The Journal of Ecopedagogy 169–79Google Scholar

Fletcher, R., ‘Environmentality unbound: Multiple governmentalities in environmental politics’ (2017) 85 Geoforum 311–15Google Scholar

Fletcher, R., ‘How I learned to stop worrying and love the market: Virtualism, disavowal, and public secrecy in neoliberal environmental conservation’ (2013) 31(5) Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 796–812Google Scholar

Fletcher, R., Dressler, W., Büscher, B., and Anderson, Z. R., ‘Debating REDD+ and its implications: Reply to Angelsen et al.’ (2017) 31(3) Conservation Biology 721–3Google Scholar

Fletcher, R., Dressler, W., Büscher, B., and Anderson, Z. R., ‘Questioning REDD+ and the future of market-based conservation’ (2016) 30(3) Conservation Biology 673–75Google Scholar

Fogel, C., ‘The local, the global, and the Kyoto protocol’ in Martello, M. L. and Jasanoff, S. (eds.), Earthly Politics: Local and Global in Environmental Governance (MIT Press, 2004)Google Scholar

The Forest Carbon Partnership Facility (Independent Evaluation Group, 2012)Google Scholar

The Forest Carbon Partnership Facility: 2018 Annual Report (Forest Carbon Partnership Facility, 2018)Google Scholar

Forest Carbon Partnership Facility: 2019 Annual Report (Forest Carbon Partnership Facility, 2019)Google Scholar

The Forest Sector (The World Bank, 1991)Google Scholar

Forests Sourcebook: Practical Guidance for Sustaining Forests in Development Cooperation (The World Bank, 2008)Google Scholar

Forsyth, T., ‘Multilevel, multiactor governance in REDD’ in Angelsen, A. (ed.), Realising REDD+: National Strategy and Policy Options (Center for International Forestry Research, 2009), pp. 113–22Google Scholar

Forsyth, T. and Johnson, C., ‘Elinor Ostrom’s legacy: Governing the commons, and the rational choice controversy’ (2014) 45(5) Development and Change 1093–1110Google Scholar

Foucault, M., The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France 1978–1979 (Palgrave Macmillan, 2008)Google Scholar

Foucault, M., Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group, 1977)Google Scholar

Foucault, M., Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977 (Pantheon, 1980)Google Scholar

Foucault, M., Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the Collège de France 1977–1978 (Palgrave Macmillan, 2007)Google Scholar

Foucault, M., ‘The subject and power’ (1982) 8(4) Critical Inquiry 777–95Google Scholar

Foucault, M., The Will to Knowledge: The History of Sexuality: Volume I (Penguin, 1998)Google Scholar

‘Founding statement’, Third World Approaches to International Law Review (TWAILR) August 2019 twailr.com/about/founding-statementGoogle Scholar

Framework for Assessing and Monitoring Forest Governance (Program on Forests (PROFOR) and FAO, 2011)Google Scholar

Frechette, A., de Bresser, M., and Hofstede, R., External Evaluation of the United Nations Collaborative Programme on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Developing Countries (the UN-REDD Programme): Volume 1 – Final Report (2014)Google Scholar

Freestone, D., ‘The establishment, role and evolution of the global environment facility: Operationalising common but differentiated responsibility?’ in Malick Ndiaye, T. and Wolfrum, R. (eds.), Law of the Sea, Environmental Law and Settlement of Disputes: Liber Amicorum Judge Thomas A. Mensah (Brill Nijhoff, 2007), pp. 1077–107Google Scholar

Freestone, D., ‘Interview with David Freestone’ (2017) 3 Carbon & Climate Law Review 196–7Google Scholar

Freestone, D., The World Bank and Sustainable Development: Legal Essays (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2013)Google Scholar

Freestone, D. and Streck, C. (eds.), Legal Aspects of Carbon Trading: Kyoto, Copenhagen, and Beyond (Oxford University Press, 2009)Google Scholar

Freestone, D. and Streck, C. (eds.), Legal Aspects of Implementing the Kyoto Protocol Mechanisms: Making Kyoto Work (Oxford University Press, 2005)Google Scholar

Fry, I., ‘Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation: Opportunities and pitfalls in developing a new legal regime’ (2008) 17(2) Review of European Community and International Environmental Law 166–82Google Scholar

Gallagher, J. and Robinson, R., ‘The imperialism of free trade’ (1953) 6(1) The Economic History Review: New Series 1–15Google Scholar

Gathii, J. T., ‘Good governance as a counter-insurgency agenda to oppositional and transformative social projects in international law’ (1995) 5 Buffalo Human Rights Law Review 107–74Google Scholar

Gathii, J. T., ‘The limits of the new international rule of law on good governance’ in Obiora, E. K. and Quashigah, O. C. (eds.), Legitimate Governance in Sub-Saharan Africa (Kluwer Publishers, 1999), pp. 207–31Google Scholar

Gathii, J. T., ‘Neoliberalism, colonialism and international governance: Decentering the international law of governmental legitimacy’ (2000) 98 Michigan Law Review 1996–2055Google Scholar

Gathii, J. T., ‘TWAIL: A brief history of its origins, its decentralised network, and a tentative bibliography’ (2011) 3(1) Trade, Law and Development 26–64Google Scholar

Gautam, M., Lele, U., Erwinsyah, Ir., Hyde, W., Kartodiharjo, H., Khan, A., and Rana, S., Indonesia: The Challenges of World Bank Involvement in Forests (World Bank Operations Evaluation Department, 2000)Google Scholar

Getting to the Root: Underlying Causes of Deforestation and Forest Degradation, and Drivers of Forest Restoration (Global Forest Coalition, 2010)Google Scholar

Gibbon, P., ‘The World Bank and the new politics of aid’ (1993) 5(1) The European Journal of Development Research 35–62Google Scholar

Gideon, J., ‘“Consultation” or co-option? A case study from the Chilean health sector’ (2005) 5(3) Progress in Development Studies 169–81Google Scholar

Gilman, N., ‘The new international economic order: A reintroduction’ (2015) 6(1) Humanity: An International Journal of Human Rights, Humanitarianism, and Development 1–16Google Scholar

Ginsburg, C. and Keene, S., At a Crossroads: Consequential Trends in Recognition of Community-Based Forest Tenure From 2002–2017 (Rights and Resources Initiative, 2018)Google Scholar

Global Forest Resources Assessment 2015: How Are the World’s Forests Changing?, Second edition (Food and Agricultural Organisation of the United Nations, 2016)Google Scholar

Global Warming of 1.5° C (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2018)Google Scholar

Godden, L., ‘Benefit sharing in REDD+: Linking rights and equitable outcomes’ in Tehan, M.F, Godden, L., Young, M. A., and Gover, K., The Impact of Climate Change Mitigation on Indigenous and Forest Communities: International, National and Local Law Perspectives on REDD+ (Cambridge University Press, 2017), pp. 172–200Google Scholar

Godden, L., ‘Malaysia and the UN-REDD programme: Exploring possibilities for tenure pluralism in forest governance’ in Tehan, M.F, Godden, L., Young, M. A., and Gover, K., The Impact of Climate Change Mitigation on Indigenous and Forest Communities: International, National and Local Law Perspectives on REDD+ (Cambridge University Press, 2017), pp. 203–38Google Scholar

Godden, L., ‘Preserving natural heritage: Nature as other’ (1998) 22(3) Melbourne University Law Review 719–42Google Scholar

Godden, L. and Tehan, M., ‘REDD+: Climate justice and indigenous and local community rights in an era of climate disruption’ (2016) 34(1) Journal of Energy & Natural Resources Law 95–108Google Scholar

Goldman, M., ‘“Customs in common”: The epistemic world of the commons scholars’ (1997) 26(1) Theory and Society 1–37Google Scholar

Goldman, M., Imperial Nature: The World Bank and Struggles for Social Justice in an Age of Globalization (Yale University Press, 2006)Google Scholar

Gonzalez, C. G., ‘Environmental justice, human rights, and the global south’ (2015) 13 Santa Clara Journal of International Law 151–95Google Scholar

Goodrich, P., The Laws of Love: A Brief Historical and Practical Manual (Springer, 2006)Google Scholar

Goodrich, P., ‘Visive powers: Colours, trees and genres of jurisdiction’ (2008) 2(2) Law and Humanities 213–31Google Scholar

‘Google tool to help watch over world’s forests’, AFP 10 December 2009Google Scholar

Gordon, R., ‘Climate change and the poorest nations: Further reflections on global inequality’ (2007) 78 University of Colorado Review 1559–624Google Scholar

Gordon, R. W., ‘Macneil, Macaulay, and the discovery of power and solidarity in contract law’ (1985) Wisconsin Law Review 565–79Google Scholar

Gore, T., Extreme Carbon Inequality: Why the Paris Climate Deal Must Put the Poorest, Lowest Emitting and Most Vulnerable People First (Oxfam International, 2015)Google Scholar

Gover, K., ‘The elusive promise of indigenous developments: Rights, culture, strategy by Karen Engle’ (2011) 12 Melbourne Journal of International Law 419–31Google Scholar

Gover, K., ‘REDD+, tenure and indigenous property claims’ in Tehan, M. F., Godden, L., Young, M. A., and Gover, K. (eds.), The Impact of Climate Change Mitigation on Indigenous and Forest Communities: International, National and Local Law Perspectives on REDD+ (Cambridge University Press, 2017), pp. 130–71Google Scholar

Graham, P., Cooperative Approaches for Supporting REDD+: Linking Articles 5 and 6 of the Paris Agreement (Climate Advisors, 2017)Google Scholar

Gray, I. P., Climate finance, tropical forests and the state: Governing international climate risk in the Democratic Republic of Congo (Master’s thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2012)Google Scholar

Gray, K., ‘Property in thin air’ (1991) 50(2) The Cambridge Law Journal 252–307Google Scholar

Grear, A., ‘Deconstructing anthropos: A critical legal reflection on ‘anthropocentric’law and anthropocene “humanity”’ (2015) 26(3) Law and Critique 225–49Google Scholar

Grear, A., ‘Towards “climate justice”? A critical reflection on legal subjectivity and climate injustice: Warning signals, patterned hierarchies, directions for future law and policy’ (2014) 5 Journal of Human Rights and the Environment 103–33Google Scholar

Green, F. and Denniss, R., ‘Cutting with both arms of the scissors: The economic and political case for restrictive supply-side climate policies’ (2018) 150(1) Climatic Change 73–87Google Scholar

Greiber, T., Janki, M., Orellana, M., Savaresi, A., and Shelton, D., Conservation with Justice: A Rights-Based Approach (Center for International Forestry Research and International Union for Conservation of Nature, 2009)Google Scholar

Grewal, D. S., Kapczynski, A., and Purdy, J., ‘Law and political economy: Toward a manifesto’ Law and Political Economy Blog November 2017 lpeblog.org/2017/11/06/law-and-political-economy-toward-a-manifestoGoogle Scholar

Griffiths, J., ‘What is legal pluralism?’ (1986) 18(24) The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 1–55Google Scholar

Griffiths, T., Seeing ‘RED’?: ‘Avoided Deforestation’ and the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities (Forest Peoples Programme, 2007)Google Scholar

Griffiths, T., Seeing ‘REDD’?: Forests, Climate Change Mitigation and the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities, Update for Poznań (UNFCCC COP14) (Forest Peoples Programme, 2008)Google Scholar

Griffiths, T., Seeing ‘REDD’?: Forest, Climate Change Mitigation and the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities, Updated Version (Forest Peoples Programme, 2009)Google Scholar

Griscom, B. W., Adams, J., Ellis, P. W., Houghton, R. A., Lomax, G., Miteva, D. A., Schlesinger, W. H., Shoch, D., Siikamäki, J. V., and Smith, P., ‘Natural climate solutions’ (2017) 114(44) Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 11645–50Google Scholar

Grotius, H., Mare Liberum: Free Sea or a Dissertation on the Right Which the Dutch Have to Carry on Indian Trade (Brill, 1609)Google Scholar

Grove, R., Green Imperialism: Colonial Expansion, Tropical Island Edens and the Origins of Environmentalism, 1600–1860 (Cambridge University Press, 1996)Google Scholar

Guattari, F., The Three Ecologies (Continuum International Publishing Group, 2008)Google Scholar

Guha, R., Environmentalism: A Global History (Oxford University Press, 1999)Google Scholar

Gupta, J., The Climate Change Convention and Developing Countries: From Conflict to Consensus? (Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1997)Google Scholar

Gupta, J., The History of Global Climate Governance (Cambridge University Press, 2014)Google Scholar

Gupta, J., ‘International law and climate change: The challenges facing developing countries’ (2006) 16(1) Yearbook of International Environmental Law 119–53Google Scholar

Hale, C. R., ‘Neoliberal multiculturalism: The remaking of cultural rights and racial dominance in Central America’ (2005) 28(1) Political and Legal Anthropology Review 10–28Google Scholar

Hale, R. L., ‘Coercion and distribution in a supposedly non-coercive state’ (1923) 38(3) Political Science Quarterly 470–94Google Scholar

Hale, R. L., ‘Rate making and the revision of the property concept’ (1922) 22(3) Columbia Law Review 209–16Google Scholar

Hall, R., REDD Myths: A Critical Review of Proposed Mechanisms to Reduce Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation in Developing Countries (Friends of the Earth International, 2008)Google Scholar

Hall, R., The Great REDD Gamble. Time to Ditch Risky REDD for Community-Based Approaches That Are Effective, Ethical and Equitable (Friends of the Earth International, 2014)Google Scholar

Hall, R., REDD: The Realities in Black and White (Friends of the Earth International, 2010)Google Scholar

Hamilton, C., ‘The Anthropocene as rupture’ (2016) 3(2) The Anthropocene Review 93–106Google Scholar

Hamlin, T. B., ‘Debt-for-nature swaps: A new strategy for protecting environmental interests in developing nations’ (1989) 16 Ecology Law Quarterly 1065–88Google Scholar

Hamrick, K. and Gallant, M., Fertile Ground: State of Forest Carbon Finance 2017 (Forest Trends Ecosystem Marketplace, 2017)Google Scholar

Hamrick, K. and Gallant, M., Voluntary Carbon Market Insights: 2018 Outlook and First-Quarter Trends (Ecosystem Marketplace, 2018)Google Scholar

Haraway, D. J., Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene (Duke University Press, 2016)Google Scholar

Hardin, G., ‘The tragedy of the commons’ (1968) 162(3859) Science 1243–8Google Scholar

Harris, P. G., ‘Common but differentiated responsibility: The Kyoto Protocol and United States policy’ (1999) 7 NYU Environmental Law Journal 27–48Google Scholar

Harrison, R. P., Forests: The Shadow of Civilisation (The University of Chicago Press, 1992)Google Scholar

Hartmann, E. and Kjaer, P. F., ‘The status of authority in the globalizing economy: Beyond the public/private distinction’ (2018) 25(1) Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 3–11Google Scholar

Harvey, D., The New Imperialism (Oxford University Press, 2005)Google Scholar

Hasan Khan, A., ‘How is the subject of international Indigenous Peoples’ rights made? Or, when the openness of law becomes its Other’, Paper presented at Sculpting the Human: Law, Culture and Biopolitics, Conference Programme (Association for the Study of Law, Culture and the Humanities, 2013)Google Scholar

Hawkins, S., Contracting for Forest Carbon: Elements of a Model Forest Carbon Purchase Agreement (Duke Law, Forest Trends and the Katoomba Group, 2010)Google Scholar

Haywood, C., ‘The European Union’s emissions trading scheme: International emissions trading lessons for the Copenhagen Protocol and implications for Australia?’ (2009) 26 Environmental and Planning Law Journal 310–29Google Scholar

Head, J. W., ‘Environmental conditionality in the operations of international development finance institutions’ (1991) 1 The Kansas Journal of Law & Public Policy 15–26Google Scholar

Heede, R., ‘Tracing anthropogenic carbon dioxide and methane emissions to fossil fuel and cement producers, 1854–2010’ (2014) 122(1–2) Climatic Change 229–41Google Scholar

Hepburn, C., ‘Carbon trading: A review of the Kyoto mechanisms’ (2007) 32(1) Annual Review of Environment and Resources 375–93Google Scholar

Hepburn, S., ‘Carbon rights as new property: The benefits of statutory verification’ (2009) 31 Sydney Law Review 239–71Google Scholar

Herold, M., Angelsen, A., Verchot, L. V., Wijaya, A., and Ainembabazi, J. H., ‘A stepwise framework for developing REDD+ reference levels’ in Angelsen, A., Brockhaus, M., Sunderlin, W. D., and Verchot, L. V. (eds.), Analysing REDD+: Challenges and Choices (Center for International Forestry Research, 2012), pp. 279–300Google Scholar

Herz, S., Vina, A. L., and Sohn, J., Development without Conflict: The Business Case for Community Consent (World Resources Initiative, 2007)Google Scholar

Hickel, J., The Divide: A Brief Guide to Global Inequality and Its Solutions (Random House, 2017)Google Scholar

Hickel, J. and Kallis, G., ‘Is green growth possible?’ (2020) 25(4) New Political Economy 469–86Google Scholar