Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T13:10:31.537Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The PDS: “CSU des Ostens”? — Heimat and the Left

from Political Formations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2013

Peter Thompson
Affiliation:
University of Sheffield
Stuart Taberner
Affiliation:
University of Leeds
Frank Finlay
Affiliation:
University of Leeds
Get access

Summary

In characteristically polemical manner, Christian von Ditfurth thus presents the recent stance adopted by the Partei des demokratischen Sozialismus on the national question and the social coherence of the five new states as the worst of all worlds. By using the term Marxism-Leninism he reinforces the impression that the PDS is an unreconstructed Stalinist party, and by describing Heimat as a “letzte Bindemittel” he also gives the impression that the party is using this term as a desperate and cynical ploy. The PDS's use of Heimat, therefore, is presented by von Ditfurth as a bad thing — because the concept is limited only to the ex-GDR and because it might appear to flirt with sinister, hard-right nationalist policies. In one sentence the PDS is thus described as both neo-Stalinist and proto-fascist. It is the modern equivalent of the Cold War description of the SED and other left wingers as “rot-lackierte Faschisten.”

The aim of this essay is to go beyond the polemical and to investigate to what extent the PDS's attitudes toward regional and, indeed, modern German identity are rooted in the different social structures of east and west Germany. I will also ask whether the PDS can make any worthwhile contribution to the debate on the national question and challenge Ditfurth's assumption that Heimat — in its east German form at least — is inherently reactionary. These questions derive from the three-fold political reality of post-1990 Germany.

Type
Chapter
Information
Recasting German Identity
Culture, Politics, and Literature in the Berlin Republic
, pp. 123 - 140
Publisher: Boydell & Brewer
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×