Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T15:25:19.804Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 12 - Homosocial Desire in the War of Troy

Between (Wo)men

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 December 2018

Adam J. Goldwyn
Affiliation:
North Dakota State University
Ingela Nilsson
Affiliation:
Uppsala Universitet, Sweden
Get access

Summary

In this chapter, the concept of homosociality, as developed by Eve Kosofsky Sedgwick in her pioneering work Between Men: English Literature and Male Homosocial Desire (1985), is employed in order to provide a reading of the anonymous War of Troy (fourteenth century), which celebrates male ethics and ideologies. The War of Troy is the masculine romance par excellence of the Palaiologan period; thus, it can fully understood only if its male worlds are taken into consideration. Sedgwick’s concept proves particularly useful here, since it refers to “social bonds between persons of the same sex”, and is applied to such activities as “male bonding”, which may be characterized, by “intense homophobia, fear and hatred of homosexuality”. In addition, male bonding in the War of Troy reveals an ideology about men’s superiority to women, though it remains an open question whether these ideologies are imported from the Old French source or are somehow authentically Byzantine in their origin. In examining the homosocial communities of the War of Troy and their characteristics, this paper will show the key character of homosocial politics and desire both in shaping the text’s plot and comprehending its poetics.
Type
Chapter
Information
Reading the Late Byzantine Romance
A Handbook
, pp. 254 - 271
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Papathomopoulos, M. and Jeffreys, E. M. (eds.), Ο Πόλεμος της Τρωάδος (Athens 1996).Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Papathomopoulos, M. and Jeffreys, E. M. (eds.), Ο Πόλεμος της Τρωάδος (Athens 1996).Google Scholar
Agapitos, P. A. 2004. ‘SO DEBATE: Genre, Structure and Poetics in the Byzantine Vernacular Romances of Love’, Symbolae Osloensis 79: 7101.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. 2003. Gender and the Chivalric Community in Malory’s Morte d’Arthur. Gainesville.Google Scholar
Beaton, R. 1996. The Medieval Greek Romance, 2nd edn. London and New York.Google Scholar
Brooks, P. 1984. Reading for the Plot: Design and Intention in Narrative. Cambridge, MA and London.Google Scholar
Burton, J. 2000. ‘Abduction and Elopement in the Byzantine Novel’, GRBS 4: 377409.Google Scholar
Burns, J. E. 1993. Bodytalk: When Women Speak in Old French Literature. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Cairns, D. 1993. Aidos: The Psychology and Ethics of Honour and Shame in Ancient Greek Literature. Oxford.Google Scholar
Constantinou, S. 2013. ‘Retelling the Tale: The Byzantine Rewriting of Floire and Blancheflor’, in Hybridität und Spiel. Der europäische Liebes- und Abenteuerroman von der Antike zur Frühen Neuzeit, ed. Eming, J. and Baisch, M.. Berlin, 227–42.Google Scholar
Constantinou, S. (forthcoming). ‘Angry Men in the Byzantine War of Troy’, in Emotions Through Time, ed. D. Cairns et al.Google Scholar
Dinshaw, C. 1989. Chaucer’s Sexual Poetics. Madison.Google Scholar
Eagleton, T. 2012. The Event of Literature. New Haven and London.Google Scholar
Friedrich, P. 1977. ‘Sanity and Myth of Honor: The Problem of Achilles’, Ethos 5(3): 281305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garland, L. 1990. ‘Be Amorous, But Be Chaste: Sexual Morality in Byzantine Learned and Vernacular Romance’, BMGS 14: 62120.Google Scholar
Goldwyn, A. J. 2015. ‘Towards a Byzantine Ecocriticism: Witches and Nature Control in the Medieval Greek Romance’, BMGS 39(1): 6684.Google Scholar
Gunderson, E. 2000. Staging Masculinity: The Rhetoric of Performance in the Roman World. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Hansen, E. T. 1983. ‘Irony and the Antifeminist Narrator in Chaucer’s Legend of Good Women’, Journal of English and Germanic Philology 82: 1131.Google Scholar
Ingham, P. C. 2015. Sovereign Fantasies: Arthurian Romance and the Making of Britain. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Jeffreys, E. 2013. ‘Byzantine Romances: Eastern or Western?’, in Renaissance Encounters: Greek East and Latin West, ed. Brownlee, M. S. and Gondicas, D. H.. Leiden, 221–37.Google Scholar
Jameson, F. 1981. The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Kelly, K. C. 2000. Performing Virginity and Testing Chastity in the Middle Ages. London and New York.Google Scholar
Kimmel, M. S. and Aronson, A. B., 2003. Men and Masculinities: A Social, Cultural, and Historical Encyclopedia, Vol. i. Santa Barbara, CA.Google Scholar
Kosofksy Sedgwick, E. 1985. Between Men: English Literature and Male Homosocial Desire. New York.Google Scholar
Laiou, A. (ed.) 1993. Consent and Coercion to Sex and Marriage in Ancient and Medieval Societies. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Lyons, D. 2003. ‘Dangerous Gifts: Ideologies of Marriage and Exchange in Ancient Greece’, Classical Antiquity 22(1): 93134.Google Scholar
Lendari, T. 2014. ‘Gazes in Love Scenes and Glances at Their Depiction: Notes on The War of Troy’, in ‘His Words Were Nourishment and His Counsel Food’: A Festschrift for David W. Holton, ed. Camatsos, E. et al. Cambridge, 722.Google Scholar
Mackridge, P. 1992. ‘Bride-snatching in Digenes Akrites and Cypriot Heroic Poetry’, Επετηρίς Κέντρου Επιστημονικών Ερευνών 19: 617–22.Google Scholar
Mackridge, P. 1993. ‘“None But the Brave Deserve the Fair”: Abduction, Elopement, Seduction and Marriage in the Escorial Digenes Akrites and Modern Greek Heroic Songs’, in Digenes Akrites: New Approaches to Byzantine Heroic Poetry, ed. Beaton, R. and Ricks, D.. Aldershot, 150–60.Google Scholar
Moore, M. 2014. Exchanges in Exoticism: Cross-Cultural Marriage and the Making of the Mediterranean in Old French Romance. Toronto.Google Scholar
Nilsson, I. 2004. ‘From Homer to Hermoniakos: Some Considerations of Troy Matter in Byzantine Literature’, Troianalexandrina 4: 834.Google Scholar
Rabinowitz, N. S. and Auanger, L. (eds.) 2002. Among Women: From the Homosocial to the Homoerotic in the Ancient World. Austin.Google Scholar
Shawcross, T. 2003. ‘Re-inventing the Homeland in the Historiography of Frankish Greece: The Fourth Crusade and the Legend of the Trojan War’, BMGS 27: 120–52.Google Scholar
Smith, S. 2016. ‘The Iliad, an Affair of Honor’, Yale Review 104(4): 1031.Google Scholar
Soltic, J. 2014. ‘ΓΝΩΡΙΖΕ in the Greek War of Troy: A Peremptory Command or Just a Filled Pause?’, Byzantion 84: 329–55.Google Scholar
Williams, C. A. 2010. Roman Homosexuality, 2nd edn. Oxford.Google Scholar
Papathomopoulos, M. and Jeffreys, E. M. (eds.), Ο Πόλεμος της Τρωάδος (Athens 1996).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×