Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T06:10:37.600Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comments on Einar Kringlen's chapter

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2010

Steven Matthysse
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Francine M. Benes
Affiliation:
McClean Hospital
Deborah L. Levy
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Jerome Kagan
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Massachusetts
Get access

Summary

The ratio of monozygotic to dizygotic twin concordances (MZ/DZ) has been used, as Professor Kringlen indicates, as a way of defining the phenotype of schizophrenia (see also Introduction to the Genetics section). Essentially, the idea is that whatever definition has the highest MZ/DZ ratio is the “most genetic.” One can also look at the MZ/DZ ratio in a different light. Polygenic or oligogenic factors tend to elevate the MZ/DZ ratio, whereas it is expected to be close to 2 for a dominant trait caused by a single gene [2, 3]. It may be that, if a certain phenotypic definition of schizophrenia yields an MZ/DZ ratio close to 2, that phenotype is most plausibly attributed to a single gene. Other phenotypic definitions with higher MZ/DZ ratios would perhaps be associated with multigenic or polygenic factors. An analysis of this kind requires that the probands be diagnosed with the same criteria, broad or narrow, that are used for the co-twins.

The study of Farmer et al. [1] provides data that may be interpreted in this way. Rediagnosing the 62 probands from the Maudsley series according to DSM-III criteria, Farmer et al. found an MZ/DZ ratio of 5.01 for schizophrenia, consistent with the action of multiple genes, but the ratio decreased progressively as the criteria were broadened, reaching a value of 3.23 when schizophreniform disorder, paranoia and schizoaffective disorder were included.

Type
Chapter
Information
Psychopathology
The Evolving Science of Mental Disorder
, pp. 509 - 510
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×