The Psychology of Organizational Change New Insights on the Antecedents and Consequences of Individuals' Responses to Change
Book contents
- The Psychology of Organizational Change
- The Psychology of Organizational Change
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Part I Introduction
- Part II The Evolution of Change and Its Responses
- Part III Change in Context
- Part IV The Development of Change Leadership
- Part V The Process of Change Leadership
- Part VI Conclusions and Commentary
- Chapter 13 Commentary
- Index
- References
Chapter 13 - Commentary
Developments in the Recognition of Crucial Roles of Change Dynamics
from Part VI - Conclusions and Commentary
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 September 2023
Book contents
- The Psychology of Organizational Change
- The Psychology of Organizational Change
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Part I Introduction
- Part II The Evolution of Change and Its Responses
- Part III Change in Context
- Part IV The Development of Change Leadership
- Part V The Process of Change Leadership
- Part VI Conclusions and Commentary
- Chapter 13 Commentary
- Index
- References
Summary
Here I comment on the chapters that have formed the contribution of this volume. I note that this second edition makes contributions considerably beyond those of the first edition, in particular by devoting attention to the dynamics of planned organizational change, not simply its instigators and outcomes. In particular, the chapters contribute to several important themes associated with dynamics of planned change. These include ways of classifying types of organizational change, the importance of change leaders and the development of change leadership, the importance of both affective and cognitive processes (especially sensemaking) in change, the roles of several types of identity processes in change, and the recognition of temporal processes in change. The chapters show the salience of these dynamics, whether they are recognized or not, to sensitize scholars to look for them. I conclude by suggesting some possible new directions for future investigations of change. These include the use of process as well as variance theorizing, attention to change emergence, and attention to changes that extend beyond individual organizations.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Psychology of Organizational ChangeNew Insights on the Antecedents and Consequences of Individuals' Responses to Change, pp. 291 - 307Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Balogun, J., Bartunek, J. M., & Do, B. (2015). Senior managers’ sensemaking and responses to strategic change. Organization Science, 26(4), 960–979.Google Scholar
Bartunek, J. M., Putnam, L. L., & Seo, M. (2021). Dualisms and dualities in the ongoing development of organization development. In Poole, M. S. & Van de Ven, A. H. (eds.), Oxford handbook of organizational change and innovation (2nd ed., pp. 50–76). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartunek, J. M., & Woodman, R. W. (2015). Beyond Lewin: Toward a temporal approximation of organization development and change. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2, 157–182.Google Scholar
Cloutier, C., & Ravasi, D. (2020). Identity trajectories: Explaining long-term patterns of continuity and change in organizational identities. Academy of Management Journal, 63(4), 1196–1235.Google Scholar
Conroy, S. A., & O’Leary-Kelly, A. M. (2014). Letting go and moving on: Work-related identity loss and recovery. Academy of Management Review, 39, 67–87.Google Scholar
Farmer, N. (2017). The invisible organization: How informal networks can lead organizational change. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Feldman, M. S. (2000). Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organization Science, 11, 611–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gioia, D. A., Patvardhan, S. D., Hamilton, A. L., & Corley, K. G. (2013). Organizational identity formation and change. Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 123–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, J. (1998). Antecedent- and response-focused emotion regulation: Divergent consequences for experience, expression, and physiology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(1), 224–237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gross, J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 348–362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howard-Grenville, J., Nelson, A. J., Earle, A. G., Haack, J. A., & Young, D. M. (2017). “If chemists don’t do it, who is going to?” Peer-driven occupational change and the emergence of green chemistry. Administrative Science Quarterly, 62(3), 524–560.Google Scholar
Jansen, K. J., Shipp, A. J., & Michael, J. H. (2016). Champions, converts, doubters, and defectors: The impact of shifting perceptions on momentum for change. Personnel Psychology, 69, 673–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., Dowell, G. W., & Berchicci, L. (2021). Strategy and organization scholarship through a radical sustainability lens: A call for 5.0. Strategic Organization, 19(3), 449–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., Lê, J., & Balogun, J. (2019). The social practice of coevolving strategy and structure to realize mandated radical change. Academy of Management Journal, 62(3), 850–882.Google Scholar
Kelly, J. R. (2001). Mood and emotion in groups. The Blackwell handbook of social psychology, 3, 164–181.Google Scholar
van Knippenberg, D., & Hogg, M. A. (eds.) (2003). Leadership and power: Identity processes in groups and organizations. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
Kunisch, S., Bartunek, J. M., Mueller, J., & Huy, Q. N. (2017). Time in strategic change research. Academy of Management Annals, 11(2), 1005–1064.Google Scholar
Lüscher, L. S., & Lewis, M. W. (2008). Organizational change and managerial sensemaking: Working through paradox. Academy of Management Journal, 51(2), 221–240.Google Scholar
Mohrman, S. A., & Bartunek, J. M. (2023). How can ODC help accomplish a sustainable future? A joint reflection. Research in Organizational Change and Development, 30, 1–26.Google Scholar
Mühlemann, N., Steffens, N. K., Ullrich, J., Haslam, S. A., & Jonas, K. (2022). Understanding responses to an organizational takeover: Introducing the social identity model of organizational change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 123(5), 1004–1023.Google Scholar
Oreg, S., Bartunek, J., Lee, G., & Do, B. (2018). An affect-based model of recipients’ responses to organizational change events. Academy of Management Review, 43, 65–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oreg, S., Michel, A., & By, R. T. (eds.) (2013). The psychology of organizational change: Viewing change from the employee’s perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Plowman, D. A., Baker, L. T., Beck, T. E., Kulkarni, M., Solansky, S. T., & Travis, D. V. (2007). Radical change accidentally: The emergence and amplification of small change. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 515–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36, 381–403.Google Scholar
Stouten, J., Rousseau, D. M., & De Cremer, D. (2018). Successful organizational change: Integrating the management practice and scholarly literature. Academy of Management Annals, 12(2), 752–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. In Worchel, S. & Austin, W. G. (eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
Williams, A., & Whiteman, G. (2021). A call for deep engagement for impact: Addressing the planetary emergency. Strategic Organization, 19(3), 526–537.Google Scholar
Woodman, R. W., & Bartunek, J. M. (2013). Commentary: Change processes and action implications. In Oreg, S., Michel, A., & By, R. (eds.), The psychology of organizational change (pp. 301–323). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar