Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T05:21:31.218Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

3 - Briefing and debriefing: group psychological interventions in acute stressor situations

from Part I - Key conceptual framework of debriefing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 January 2010

Beverley Raphael
Affiliation:
New South Wales Health Department, Sydney
John Wilson
Affiliation:
Cleveland State University
Get access

Summary

EDITORIAL COMMENTS

This chapter by Lars Weisæth brings a very thoughtful appraisal of the significance of debriefing for different groups of personnel. The model presented is based on extensive traumatic stress research and experience and appraisal of the use of supportive and preventive interventions in disaster and trauma situations. It highlights the relation of debriefing to Briefing and suggests that formal debriefing should be provided only for those who have been ‘briefed’ to deal with an incident, disaster or violently traumatic experience. This approach focusses on the potential value of what is called group stress debriefing (GSD) for professional rescue and emergency response teams, who are trained and mobilized. It may also have some value for those who are ‘reservist’ teams. He emphasizes, however, that its key principles may be incorporated into the leadership role of the team leader and he or she may be specifically trained to implement the model in the team's functional response and standdown. There may, in fact, be negative consequences, with intrusion of health personnel between the team leader and team members, and it is suggested that these health personnel (trained debriefers) should be used only in high-risk situations: for instance death of significant numbers of team members, witnessing of people dying and being unable to save lives, and feelings of failure in the rescue operations. Other groups, for instance natural groups, random groups or victim groups may need an individualized approach and other methods of prevention or trauma intervention to be provided – not a formal and structured group process.

Type
Chapter
Information
Psychological Debriefing
Theory, Practice and Evidence
, pp. 43 - 57
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×