Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-86b6f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-09T16:49:39.305Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

14 - Protective measurement and the nature of the wave function within the primitive ontology approach

from Part II - Meanings and implications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2015

By
Vincent Lam
Edited by
Shan Gao
Vincent Lam
Affiliation:
University of Lausanne
Shan Gao
Affiliation:
Chinese Academy of Sciences
Get access

Summary

Introduction

One of the crucial issues about protective measurements is the extent to which they provide (additional) grounds for some realist understanding of the wave function. This issue is notoriously subject to debate, which is not the aim of this chapter. Rather, this chapter aims at clarifying the further issue of the ontological picture corresponding to the realist understanding of the wave function possibly suggested by protective measurements. Oddly enough, proponents of a realist reading of protective measurements remain in general rather vague about ontology (see for instance Aharonov et al. (1993, 4624), who assimilate the wave function to an “extended object” without further details, or the brief and somewhat unprecise discussion in Dickson (1995, 135–136) of the interpretation of the wave function within Bohmian mechanics (BM) and within the theoretical framework elaborated by Ghirardi, Rimini and Weber (GRW); in this volume, Gao does propose a more elaborated ontological model for quantum mechanics (QM) based on protective measurements).

Despite this vagueness (or maybe because of it), it seems that the most obvious ontological intuition resulting from protective measurements points towards some form of straightforward realism about the wave function understood in the sense of a real, physical field: indeed, protective measurements are claimed to allow measuring expectation values of observables on a single quantum system, thereby providing the possibility of reconstructing (i.e. “measuring” in some sense) the wave function of a single quantum system. Aharonov et al. (1996, 125) clearly express this intuition: “We can observe the expectations values of operators, and we can observe the density and the current of the Schrödinger wave. We can “see” in some sense the Schrödinger wave. This leads us to believe that it has physical reality.”

Therefore, this kind of intuition seems in line with a realist conception of the wave function, according to which the wave function is considered as a real substantial, material in some sense) entity on its own (this view is often called “wave function realism”).

Type
Chapter
Information
Protective Measurement and Quantum Reality
Towards a New Understanding of Quantum Mechanics
 , pp. 195 - 210
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Y., Aharonov, J., Anandan, and L., Vaidman. Meaning of the wave function. Physical Review A, 47(6):4616–4626, 1993.Google Scholar
Y., Aharonov, J., Anandan, and L., Vaidman. The meaning of protective measurements. Foundations of Physics, 26(1):117–126, 1996.Google Scholar
Y., Aharonov, B.-G., Englert, and M. O., Scully. Protective measurements and Bohm trajectories. Physics Letters A, 262:137–146, 1999.Google Scholar
Y., Aharonov and L., Vaidman. About position measurements which do not show the Bohmian particle position. In J. T., Cushing, A., Fine, and S., Goldstein (eds.), Bohmian Mechanics and Quantum Theory: an Appraisal, pages 141–154. Dordrecht, Springer, 1996.
V., Allori. Primitive ontology and the structure of fundamental physical theories. In A., Ney and D. Z., Albert (eds.), The Wave Function: Essays in the Metaphysics of Quantum Mechanics, pages 58–75. New York, Oxford University Press, 2013.
V., Allori, S., Goldstein, R., Tumulka, and N., Zanghì. On the common structure of Bohmian mechanics and the Ghirardi–Rimini–Weber theory. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 59:353–389, 2008.Google Scholar
V., Allori, S., Goldstein, R., Tumulka, and N., Zanghi. Many worlds and Schrodinger's first quantum theory. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 62:1–27, 2011.Google Scholar
J. A., Barrett. The persistence of memory: surreal trajectories in Bohm's theory. Philosophy ofScience, 67:680–703, 2000.Google Scholar
J. S., Bell. Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1987.
G., Belot. Quantum states for primitive ontologists. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 2:67–83, 2012.Google Scholar
M. C., Boscá. Some observations upon “realistic” trajectories in Bohmian quantum mechanics. Theoria, 76:45–60, 2013.Google Scholar
C., Dewdney, L., Hardy, and E. J., Squires. How late measurements of quantum trajectories can fool a detector. Physics Letters A, 184:6–11, 1993.Google Scholar
M., Dickson. An empirical reply to empiricism: protective measurement opens the door for quantum realism. Philosophy of Science, 62(1):122–140, 1995.Google Scholar
F., Dowker and I., Herbauts. The status of the wave function in dynamical collapse models. Foundations of Physics Letters, 18:499–518, 2005.Google Scholar
A., Drezet. Comment on “Protective measurements and Bohm trajectories”.Physics Letters A, 350:416–118, 2006.Google Scholar
D., Düirr, S., Fusseder, S., Goldstein, and N., Zanghì. Comment on “Surrealistic Bohm trajectories”.Zeitschriftfur Naturforschung, 48a:1261–1262, 1993.Google Scholar
D., Dürr, S., Goldstein, and N., Zanghì. Bohmian mechanics and the meaning of the wave function. In R., Cohen, M, Horn, and J., Stachel (eds.), Experimental Metaphysics, pages 25–38. Dordrecht, Kluwer, 1997.
B.-G., Englert, M. O., Scully, G., Sussmann, and H., Walther. Surrealistic Bohm trajectories. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung, 47a:1175–1186, 1992.Google Scholar
M., Esfeld. Quantum entanglement and a metaphysics of relations. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 35:601–617, 2004.Google Scholar
M., Esfeld. How to account for quantum non-locality: ontic structural realism and the primitive ontology of quantum physics. Synthese, to appear, 2014.Google Scholar
M., Esfeld and V., Lam. Moderate structural realism about space-time. Synthese, 160:27–46, 2008.Google Scholar
M., Esfeld, D., Lazarovici, M., Hubert, and D., Dürr. The ontology of Bohmian mechanics. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 64: doi:10.1093/bjps/axt019, 2013.Google Scholar
S., French. Whither wave function realism. In A., Ney and D. Z., Albert (eds.), The Wave Function: Essays in the Metaphysics of Quantum Mechanics, pages 76–90. New York, Oxford University Press, 2013.
S., French and J., Ladyman. Remodelling structural realism: quantum physics and the metaphysics of structure. Synthese, 136(1):31–56, 2003.Google Scholar
A., Kantorovich. Ontic structuralism and the symmetries of particles physics. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 40:73–84, 2009.Google Scholar
J., Ladyman, D., Ross, D., Spurett, and J., Collier. Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalized. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2007.
V., Lam. The entanglement structure of quantum field systems. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 27:59–72, 2013.Google Scholar
V., Lam. Entities without intrinsic physical identity. Erkenntnis, doi:10.1007/s10670-014-9601-5, 2014.Google Scholar
T., Maudlin. The nature of the quantum state. In A., Ney and D., Albert (eds.), The Wave Function, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2013.
E., Miller. Quantum entanglement, Bohmian mechanics, and Humean supervenience. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, doi:10.1080/00048402.2013.832786, 2013.Google Scholar
F. A., Muller. Withering away, weakly. Synthese, 180:223–233, 2011.Google Scholar
A., Ney and D. Z., Albert (eds.). The Wave Function: Essays in the Metaphysics of Quantum Mechanics. New York, Oxford University Press, 2013.
T., Norsen and W., Struyve. Weak measurements and (Bohmian) conditional wave functions. arXiv:1305.2409v2, 2013.
D., Rickles, S., French, and J., Saatsi. The Structural Foundations of Quantum Gravity. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2006.
L., Vaidman. The reality in Bohmian quantum mechanics or can you kill with an empty wave bullet?Foundations of Physics, 35:299–312, 2005.Google Scholar
L., Vaidman. Protective measurements. In D., Greenberger, K., Hentschel, and F., Weinert (eds.), Compendium of Quantum Physics, pages 505–508. Berlin, Springer, 2009.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×