Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T11:52:54.791Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Protective and state measurement: a review

from Part I - Fundamentals and applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2015

By
Gennaro Auletta
Edited by
Shan Gao
Gennaro Auletta
Affiliation:
University of Cassino
Shan Gao
Affiliation:
Chinese Academy of Sciences
Get access

Summary

In this chapter, I summarize the general way in which the measurement process can be cast (by making use of effects and amplitude operators). Then, I show that there are two main problems with the state measurement: (i) how to avoid the disruptive back action on the state of the measured system during detection and (ii) how to extract complete information from this state. In order to deal with them I first introduce quantum non-demolition (QND) measurement and examine the problem whether the entire probability distribution of the measured observable is not altered by a QND measurement, which would allow repeated QND measurements with different observables to extract the whole information from the measured system. However, I show that this is not the case. Then, I deal with protective measurement as such and show that a reversible measurement is in fact not a measurement. However, by taking advantage of statistical methods (and therefore by renouncing measurement of the state of a single system), we can indeed reconstruct the wave function but only by partially recovering the information contained in the state. Two further prices to pay are to admit the existence of negative quasi-probabilities due to the interference terms and to make use of unsharp observables for guaranteeing informational completeness.

Introduction

The aim of this chapter is a review of the developments related to the measurement of the state vector and the problems that have been raised in this context.

Traditionally, the state vector or the wave function describing quantum systems has been considered as a formal tool for calculating the probabilities associated with certain events like measurement outcomes, but few scholars have tried to attribute to it an ontological status. It is well known how many difficulties are related to an attempt at assigning a kind of reality to the state of quantum systems.

Type
Chapter
Information
Protective Measurement and Quantum Reality
Towards a New Understanding of Quantum Mechanics
 , pp. 39 - 62
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Aharonov, Y. and Vaidman, L., Measurement of the Schrödinger wave of a single particle, Physics Letters A 178: 38–42 (1993).Google Scholar
[2] Aharonov, Y., Anandan, J., and Vaidman, L., Meaning of the wave function, Physical Review A47: 4616–4626 (1993).Google Scholar
[3] Auletta, G., Foundations and Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics; in the Light of a Critical-Historical Analysis of the Problems and of a Synthesis of the Results, Singapore, World Scientific (2000; rev. edn. 2001).
[4] Auletta, G., Fortunato, M., and Parisi, G., Quantum Mechanics, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press (2009, 2014).
[5] Auletta, G., Cognitive Biology: Dealing with Information from Bacteria to Minds. Oxford, Oxford University Press (2011).
[6] Auletta, G. and Torcal, L., From wave-particle to features-event complementarity, International Journal of Theoretical Physics 50: 3654–3668 (2011).Google Scholar
[7] Braginsky, V. B. and Khalili, F. Y., Quantum Measurement, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press (1992).
[8] Busch, P., Grabowski, M., and Lahti, P. J., Operational Quantum Physics, Berlin, Springer (1995).
[9] Chiu, C. B., Misra, B., and Sudarshan, E. C. G., Time evolution of unstable quantum states and a resolution of Zeno's paradox, Physical Review D16: 520–529 (1977).Google Scholar
[10] de Muynck, W. M., Stoffels, W. W., and Martens, H., Joint measurement of interference and path observables in optics and neutron interferometry, Physica B 175: 127–132 (1991).Google Scholar
[11] de Muynck, W. M., De >Baere, W., and Martens, H., Interpretation of quantum mechanics, joint measurement of incompatible observables, and counterfactual definiteness, Foundations of Physics 24: 1598–1663 (1994).Google Scholar
[12] de Muynck, W. M., Foundations ofQuantum Mechanics, an Empiricist Approach, New York, Kluwer Academic Publishers (2002).
[13] Feynman, R. P., Negative probability, in [17, pp. 235-248].
[14] Finkelstein, D. R., Quantum Relativity, Berlin, Springer (1996).
[15] Healey, D. M., Jr. and Schroeck, F. E., Jr., On informational completeness ofcovariant localization observables and Wigner coefficients, Journal of Mathematical Physics 36: 453–507 (1995).Google Scholar
[16] Helstrom, C. W., Quantum Detection and Estimation Theory, New York, Academic Press (1976).
[17] Hiley, B. J. and Peat, F. D. (eds.), Quantum Implications: Essays in Honor ofDavid Bohm, London, Routledge, (1987, 1991, 1994).
[18] Kraus, K., States, Effects and Operations, Berlin, Springer (1983).
[19] Misra, B. and Sudarshan, E. C. G., The Zeno's paradox in quantum theory, Journal of Mathematical Physics 18: 756–763 (1977).Google Scholar
[20] Nielsen, M. A. and Caves, C. M., Reversible quantum operations and their application to teleportation, Physical Review A55: 2547–2556 (1997).Google Scholar
[21] Prugovecki, E., Information-theoretical aspects of quantum measurement, International Journal of Theoretical Physics 16: 321–333 (1977).Google Scholar
[22] Royer, A., Measurement of the Wigner function, Physical Review Letters 55: 2745–2748 (1985).Google Scholar
[23] Royer, A., Measurement of quantum states and the Wigner function, Foundations of Physics 19: 3–30 (1989).Google Scholar
[24] Scully, M. O., Walther, H., and Schleich, W., Feynman's approach to negative probability in quantum mechanics, Physical Review A49 (1994): 1562–1566.Google Scholar
[25] Wheeler, J. A., The ‘past’ and the ‘delayed-choice’ double-slit experiment, in Marlow, A. R. (ed.), Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Theory, New York, Academic Press, 9–48 (1978).
[26] Zurek, W. H., Quantum origin of quantum jumps: breaking of unitary symmetry induced by information transfer in the transition from quantum to classical, Physical Review A76: 052110-1–5 (2007).Google Scholar
[27] Zwolak, M. and Zurek, W. H., Complementarity of quantum discord and classically accessible information, Scientific Reports 3 (2013): 1729.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×