Book contents
- Proportionality in Action
- Cambridge Studies in Constitutional Law
- Proportionality in Action
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Cases
- Introduction
- 1 Proportionality Analysis by the German Federal Constitutional Court
- 2 Proportionality Analysis by the Canadian Supreme Court
- 3 Proportionality Analysis by the South African Constitutional Court
- 4 Proportionality Analysis by the Israeli Supreme Court
- 5 Proportionality Analysis by the Polish Constitutional Tribunal
- 6 Limitation Analysis by the Indian Supreme Court
- 7 Comparative and Empirical Insights into Judicial Practice
- Index
Contents
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 April 2020
- Proportionality in Action
- Cambridge Studies in Constitutional Law
- Proportionality in Action
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Cases
- Introduction
- 1 Proportionality Analysis by the German Federal Constitutional Court
- 2 Proportionality Analysis by the Canadian Supreme Court
- 3 Proportionality Analysis by the South African Constitutional Court
- 4 Proportionality Analysis by the Israeli Supreme Court
- 5 Proportionality Analysis by the Polish Constitutional Tribunal
- 6 Limitation Analysis by the Indian Supreme Court
- 7 Comparative and Empirical Insights into Judicial Practice
- Index
Summary
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e410e/e410e4cba3a7190b22712761a5ed2ab66704c170" alt="Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'"
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Proportionality in ActionComparative and Empirical Perspectives on the Judicial Practice, pp. vii - ixPublisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020