References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 August 2018
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Proclus: Commentary on Plato's Republic , pp. 314 - 320Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Abbate, Michele. 2004. Proclo: Commento alla Repubblica di Platone: Dissertazioni I, III–V, VII–XII, XIV–XV, XVII. Pavia: Bompiani.Google Scholar
Abbate, Michele. 2006. ‘Metaphysics and Theology as Methodological and Conceptual Paradigms in Proclus’ Ethico-Political Theory’. In Proklos. Methode, Seelenlehre, Metaphysik, ed. Perkams, M. and Piccione, M., 186–200. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Annas, Julia. 1981. An Introduction to Plato’s Republic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Armstrong, A. H. 1966–88. Plotinus: Enneads. 7 vols, Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Athanassiadi, Polymnia. 1993. ‘Persecution and Response in Late Paganism’, Journal of Hellenic Studies 113, 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Athanassiadi, Polymnia. 1999. Damascius: The Philosophical History – Text with Translation and Notes. Athens: Apamea Cultural Association.Google Scholar
Baltzly, Dirk. 2004. ‘The virtues and “becoming like god”: Alcinous to Proclus’. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 26: 297–322.Google Scholar
Baltzly, Dirk. 2009. ‘Proclus’. In The History of Western Philosophy of Religion, vol 1: Ancient Philosophy of Religion, ed. Oppy, G. and Trakakis, N., 263–76. Durham: Acumen.Google Scholar
Baltzly, Dirk. 2013a. Proclus: Commentary on Plato’s Timaeus, Volume V, Book 4: Proclus on Time and the Stars. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baltzly, Dirk. 2013b. ‘Proclus and Theodore of Asine on female philosopher-rulers: Patriarchy, metempsychosis and women in the Neoplatonic commentary’. Ancient Philosophy 33(2):403–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baltzly, Dirk. 2014. ‘Plato’s Authority and the Formation of Textual Communities in Late Antiquity’. Classical Quarterly 64(2):793–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baltzly, Dirk. 2016. ‘Transformations of Pythagorean wisdom and psychic ἄσκησις in Proclus’ Timaeus Commentary’. In Pythagorean Knowledge from the Ancient to the Modern World: Askesis, Religion, Science, ed. Renger, A.-B. and Stavru, A.. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.Google Scholar
Baltzly, Dirk. forthcoming. ‘Amelius and Theodore of Asine’. In The Brill Companion to the Reception of Plato in Anquity, ed. Baltzly, D., Layne, D., Renaud, F. and Tarrant, H.. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Bielmeier, Amandus. 1930. Die neuplatonische Phaidrosinterpretation. Vol. 16, Rhetorische Studien. Paderborn: F. Schöningh.Google Scholar
Blondell, Ruby. 2002. The Play of Character in Plato’s Dialogues. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonazzi, Mauro, Lévy, Carlos, and Steel, Carlos G.. 2007. A Platonic Pythagoras : Platonism and Pythagoreanism in the Imperial Age. Monotheismes et philosophie. Turnhout: Brepols.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brisson, Luc 2006. “The doctrine of the degrees of virtue in the Neoplatonists: an analysis of Porphyry’s Sentences 32, its antecedents, and its heritage.” In Reading Plato in Antiquity, edited by Tarrant, H. and Baltzly, D., 89–106. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Brisson, Luc and Flamand, Jean-Marie. 1992. ‘Structure, contenu et intentions de l’Oracle d’Apollon [Porphrye VP 22].’ In Vie de Plotin II, edited by Brisson, Luc et al., 565–602. Paris: J. Vrin.Google Scholar
Brown, Peter. 1971. ‘The Rise and Function of the Holy Man in Late Antiquity’. Journal of Roman Studies 61:80–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Peter. 1992. Power and Persuasion in Late Antiquity: Towards a Christian empire. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Buffière, F. 1956. Les mythes d’Homère et la pensée grecque. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Buresch, Karl. 1889. Klaros. Untersuchungen zum Orakelwesen des späteren Altertums. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Callataÿ, Godefroid. 1996. Annus Platonicus: A Study of World Cycles in Greek, Latin and Arabic Sources. Louvain: Institut Orientaliste, Université Catholique de Louvain.Google Scholar
Chlup, Radek. 2012. Proclus: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coulter, J. A. 1976. The Literary Microcosm: Theories of Interpretation in Later Neoplatonism. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Des Places, Edouard. 1996. Oracles chaldaïques, 3rd edn revised and corrected by Segonds, A., Paris: Société d’édition Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Deuse, Werner, ed. 1973. Theodorus von Asine: Sammlung der Testimonien und Kommentar. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner VerlagGoogle Scholar
Dillon, John. 1973. Iamblichi Chalcidensis in Platonis Dialogos Commentariorum Fragmenta. Philosophia Antiqua. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Dillon, John. 1990. ‘Image, Symbol and Analogy: Three Basic Concepts of Neoplatonic Allegorical Exegesis’. In The Golden Chain: Studies in the Development of Platonism and Christianity, edited by Dillon, J. M. (1990), 247–58. Variorum: Aldershot. [First published in: The Significance of Neoplatonism edited by Harris, R. Baine, 247–62. Buffalo: State University of New York Press.]Google Scholar
Dillon, John. 1995. ‘The Neoplatonic Exegesis of the Statesman Myth’. In Reading the Statesman: Proceedings of the III Symposium Platonicum, ed. Rowe, C., 364–74. Sank Augustin: Academia.Google Scholar
Dillon, John and Polleichtner, Wolfgang. 2009. Iamblichus of Chalcis: The Letters. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature.Google Scholar
Dodds, E. R. 1961. ‘New Light on the Chaldaean Oracles’, Harvard Theological Review 54(4): 263–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dodds, E. R. 1963. Proclus: The Elements of Theology. 2nd edn. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Elsner, Jaś. 2009. ‘A Protean Corpus’. In Philostratus, ed. Bowie, E. and Elsner, J., 3–18. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Festugière, A. J. 1968. ‘Contemplation philosophique et art théurgique chez Proclus.’ In Studi di Storia Religiosa della tarda antichita, ed. Bianchi, U., 7–18. Messina: Università di Messina. Reprinted in Études de philosophie Grecque (1971), ed. Festugière, A. J., 585–96. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Festugière, A. J. 1970. Proclus: Commentaire sur la Républic. Trans. Festugière, A. J.. 3 vols, Bibliothèque des textes philosophiques. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Festugière, A. J. 1971. “Modes de composition des Commentaires de Proclus.” In Études de Philosophie Grecque, ed. Festugière, A. J., 551–74. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Finamore, John. 1985. Iamblichus and the Theory of the Vehicle of the soul. American Classical Studies; no. 14. Chico, Calif.: Scholars Press.Google Scholar
Finamore, John. 2004. ‘Proclus on Ritual Practice in Neoplatonic Religious Philosophy’. In Being or Good? Metamorphoses of Neoplatonism, ed. Kijewska, A., 123–37. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.Google Scholar
Fortenbaugh, William. 2003. “Theophrastus, no. 84 FHS&G: There’s nothing new here! Did Theophrastus oppose Aristotle and accept quantification of the predicate?” In Theophrastean Studies, edited by Fortenbaugh, W., 22–34. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner.Google Scholar
Fowden, Garth. 1982. ‘The Pagan Holy Man in Late Antique Society’. Journal of Hellenic Studies 102:33–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedl, A. J. 1936. Die Homer-Interpretation des Neuplatonikers Proklos. Dresden: Verlag M. Dittert & Co.Google Scholar
Gallavotti, C. 1929. ‘Eterogeneità e cronologia dei Commenti di Proclo alla “Repubblica”’. Rivista di Filologia e di Istruzione Classica 57:208–19.Google Scholar
Gersh, Stephen. 2003. ‘Proclus’ Commentary on the Timaeus: The Prefatory Material’. BICS 46: 143–53.Google Scholar
Griffin, Michael. 2014. ‘Hypostasizing Socrates’. In The Neoplatonic Socrates, edited by Layne, D. A. and Tarrant, Harold, 97–108. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Harry, Chelsea, and Polansky, Ron. 2016. ‘Plato on Women’s Natural Ability: Revisiting Republic v and Timaeus 41e3–44d2 and 86b1–92c3’. Apeiron ahead of print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helmig, Christoph. 2013. Forms and Concepts: Concept Formation in the Platonic Tradition. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Heubeck, Alfred and Hoekstra, Arie. 1990. A Commentary on Homer’s Odyssey. Vol 2, Book IX–XVI. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, Richard. 2009. ‘The Garland of Hippolytus’. Trends in Classics 1: 18–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inwood, Brad, and Gerson, L. P.. 1988. Hellenistic Philosophy: Introductory Readings. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Johnson, A. P. 2013. Religion and Identity in Porphyry of Tyre: The Limits of Hellenism in Late Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, W. 2010. Readers and Reading Culture in the High Roman Empire: A Study of Elite Communities. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaster, Robert. 1997. Guardians of Language: The Grammarian and Society in Late Antiquity, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, George A. 1980. ‘Later Greek Philosophy and Rhetoric’. Philosophy & Rhetoric 13,3:181–97.Google Scholar
Kennedy, George A. 1983. Greek Rhetoric under Christian Emperors. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, George A. 2003. Progymnasmata: Greek Textbooks of Prose Composition and Rhetoric. Writings from the Greco-Roman World. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature.Google Scholar
Kirk, G. S. 1985. The Iliad: A Commentary. Volume I: books 1–4. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroll, W., ed. 1899–1901. Procli Diadochi in Platonis Rem publicam commentarii. 2 vols. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Kuisma, O. 1996. Proclus’ Defence of Homer. Commentationes Humanarum Litterarum. Helsinki: Societas Scientiarum Fennica.Google Scholar
Lamberton, Robert. 1986. Homer the theologian: Neoplatonist Allegorical Reading and the Growth of the Epic Tradition, Transformation of the Classical Heritage vol. 9. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lamberton, Robert. 2012. Proclus the Successor on Poetics and the Homeric Poems: Essays 5 and 6 of His Commentary on the Republic of Plato. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature.Google Scholar
Lamberton, Robert. 2016. ‘The Invisible Adversary: Anti-Christian Polemic in Proclus’s Commentary on the Republic of Plato’. In Strategies of Polemics in Greek and Roman Philosophy, ed. Weisser, S. and Thaler, N., 230–8. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Lamberz, Erich. 1987. ‘Form des philosophischen Kommentars’. In Proclus: lecteur et interprète des anciens, edited by Pépin, J. and Saffrey, H. D., 1–20. Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar
Lankila, Tuoma. 2009. ‘Aphrodite in Proclus’ Theology’. Journal for Late Antique Religion and Culture 3: 21–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Layne, Danielle A. 2009. ‘Refutation and Double Ignorance in Proclus’. Epoche: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 13(2):347–62.Google Scholar
Lewy, Hans. 1978. Chaldaean Oracles and Theurgy, 3rd edn by Tardieu, Michel. Paris: Collection des Études Augustiniennes.Google Scholar
Long, A. A., and Sedley, D. N.. 1987. The Hellenistic philosophers. 2 vols. Cambridge [Cambridgeshire]; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
MacIsaac, Gregory. 2009. ‘The Soul and the Virtues in Proclus’ Commentary on the Republic of Plato’. Philosophie antique 9:115–43.Google Scholar
Majercik, R. 2013. The Chaldaean Oracles: Text, Translation, and Commentary, 2nd edn. Dillon Marsh: Prometheus Trust.Google Scholar
Manolea, C.-P. 2004. The Homeric Tradition in Syrianus. Athens: Ant. Stamoulis Editions.Google Scholar
Manolea, C.-P. 2013. ‘Possessed and Inspired: Hermias on Divine Madness.’ The International Journal of the Platonic Tradition 7,2:156–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfeld, Jaap. 1994. Prolegomena: Questions to be Settled before the Study of an Author or a Text. Philosophia antiqua. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marzillo, Patrizia. 2010. Der Kommentar des Proklos zu Hesiods ‘Werken und Tagen’. Edition, Übersetzung und Erläuterung der Fragmente. Tübingen: Narr Verlag.Google Scholar
Menn, Stephen. 1998. Descartes and Augustine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menn, Stephen. 2012. ‘Self-motion and reflection: Hermias and Proclus on the harmony of Plato and Aristotle on the soul’. In Neoplatonisn and the Philosophy of Nature, ed. Wilberding, J. and Horn, C., 44–67. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miles, Graeme. 2017. Philostratus: Interpreters and Interpretation. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. 1978. Aristotle’s De Motu Animalium: Text with Translation, Commentary and Interpretive Essays. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Martha. 1994. The Therapy of Desire: Theory and Practice in Hellenistic Ethics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
O’Meara, Dominic J. 1989. Pythagoras Revived: Mathematics and Philosophy in Late Antiquity. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
O’Meara, Dominic J. 2003. Platonopolis: Platonic Political Philosophy in Late Antiquity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Opsomer, Jan. 2001. ‘Proclus vs Plotinus on Matter (De mal. subs. 30–7)’. Phronesis 46(2): 154–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Opsomer, Jan and Steel, Carlos. 1999. ‘Evil without a cause: Proclus’ doctrine on the origin of evil and its antecedents in Hellenistic philosophy’. In Zur Rezeption der hellenistischen Philosophie in der Spätantike, ed. Fuhrer, T., Erler, M. and Schlapbach, K., 229–60. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Opsomer, Jan, and Steel, Carlos. Eds. 2003. Proclus: On the Existence of Evils. The Ancient Commentators on Aristotle. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Lucarini, C. M., and Moreschini, C.. 2012. Hermias Alexandrinus: In Platonis Phaedrum Scholia. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Petzl, Georg. 1969. Antike Diskussionen über die beiden Nekyiai. Beiträge zur klassischen Philologie, Heft 29. Meisenheim am Glan: Verlag Anton Hain.Google Scholar
Phillips, John. 2007. Order from Disorder: Proclus’ Doctrine of Evil and its Roots in Ancient Platonism. Ancient Mediterranean and Medieval Texts and Contexts. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pichler, Reinhard. 2005. Allegorese und Ethik bei Proklos. Untersuchungen zum Kommentar zu Platons Politeia. Berlin: Frank und Timme.Google Scholar
Praechter, Karl. 1910. ʻRichtungen und Schulen im Neuplatonismus.’ In Genethliakon Carl Robert, 104–56. Berlin: Weidmann.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary. 1975. ‘Philosophy and our mental life’. In Mind, Language, and Reality, ed. Putnam, Hilary, 291–303. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, D. A. 1964. ‘Longinus’ On the Sublime. Edited with Introduction and Commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Russell, Daniel C. 2012. Happiness for Humans. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saffrey, H.-D. 1975. ‘Allusions antichrétiennes chez Proclus: le diadoque platonicien’. Revue des Sciences Philosophiques et Philogiques 59: 553–63.Google Scholar
Saffrey, H.-D. 1981. ‘Les Néoplatoniciens et les Oracles Chaldaïques’. Revue des Études Augustiniennes 26 : 209–55.Google Scholar
Saffrey, H.-D., Segonds, A. P., and Luna, C.. 2001. Proclus, ou, sur le bonheur. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Sellew, Philip. 1989. ‘Achilles or Christ? Porphyry and Didymus in Debate Over Allegorical Interpretation’. Harvard Theological Review 82.1: 79–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, Gregory. 1995. Theurgy and the Soul: The Neoplatonism of Iamblichus. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Sheppard, Anne. 1980. Studies on the 5th and 6th Essays of Proclus’ Commentary on the Republic. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheppard, Anne. 1982. ‘Proclus’ Attitude to Theurgy’. Classical Quarterly 30.1: 212–24.Google Scholar
Snyder, H. Gregory. 2000. Teachers and Texts in the Ancient World: Philosophers, Jews and Christians, ed. Sawyer, John and Sawyer, Debora. Religion in the First Christian Centuries. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sorabji, Richard. 1980. Necessity, Cause and Blame : Perspectives on Aristotle’s Theory. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Sorabji, Richard. 2005. The Philosophy of the Commentators: Vol. 1: Psychology (with Ethics and Religion). 3 vols. Vol. 1. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
St-Germain, Philippe. 2006a. ‘Remarques sur les symbolismes du Commentaire sur la République de Proclus’. Laval théologique et philosophique 62(1): 111–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
St-Germain, Philippe. 2006b. ‘Mythe et éducation: Proclus et la critique platonicienne de la poésie’. Laval théologique et philosophique 62(2): 301–18.Google Scholar
Stalley, R. F. 1995. ‘The Unity of the State: Plato, Aristotle and Proclus’. Polis 14:129–49.Google Scholar
Steel, Carlos. 1978. The Changing Self: A Study of the Soul in Later Neoplatonism – Iamblichus, Damascius and Priscianus. Brussels: Koninklijke Academie Wetenschappen.Google Scholar
Steel, Carlos. 1997. ‘Proklos über Selbstreflexion und Selbstbegründung.’ In Proklos. Methode, Seelenlehre, Metaphysik, ed. Perkams, M. and Piccione, R. M., 230–55. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Struck, P. T. 2004. Birth of the Symbol: Ancient Readers at the Limits of their Texts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tanaseanu-Döbler, Ilinca. 2013. Theurgy in Late Antiquity: The Invention of a Ritual Tradition. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarrant, Harold. 1993. Thrasyllan Platonism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarrant, Harold. 2007. Proclus: Commentary on Plato’s Timaeus, Vol. 1, Book I–Proclus on the Socratic State and Atlantis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tarrant, Harold. 2010. ‘Politike Eudaimonia: Olympiodorus on Plato’s Republic.’ In From the Old Academy to Later Neo-Platonism: Studies in the History of Platonic Thought, ed. Tarrant, Harold. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
van den Berg, Robbert. 2001. Proclus’ Hymns. Essays, Translations, Commentary. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van den Berg, Robbert. 2003. ‘“Becoming Like God” According to Proclus’ Interpretations of the Timaeus, the Eleusinian Mysteries, and the Chaldaean Oracles’. Bulletin of the Institute for Classical Studies 46: 189–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van den Berg, Robbert. 2014a. ‘A Problem Concerning Providence: Proclus and Plutarch on Inherited Guilt and Postponed Punishment’. In Fate, Providence and Moral Responsibility in Ancient, Medieval and Early Modern Thought, ed. d’Hoine, P. and Van Riel, G., 239–52. Leuven: Leuven University Press.Google Scholar
van den Berg, Robbert. 2014b. ‘Proclus on Hesiod’s Works and Days and “Didactic” Poetry’. Classical Quarterly 64.1: 383–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Liefferinge, Carine. 1999. La Théurgie. Des Oracles Chaldaïques à Proclus. Liège: Centre International d’Étude de la Religion Grecque Antique.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Liefferinge, Carine. 2000. ‘L’immortalisation par le feu dans la littérature grecque: du récit mythique à la pratique rituelle’. Dialogues d’histoire ancienne 26(2): 99–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Liefferinge, Carine. 2002. ‘Homère erre-t-il loin de la science théologique? De la réhabilitation du “divin” poète par Proclus’. Kernos 15: 199–210.Google Scholar
Van Riel, Gerd. 2000. Pleasure and the Good Life: Plato, Aristotle and the Neoplatonists. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, E. D. 2012. ‘Education: Speaking, Thinking, and Socializing’. In The Oxford Handbook of Late Antiquity, ed. Johnson, Scott Fitzgerald, 467–86. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Westerink, L. G. 1962. Anonymous Prolegomena to Platonic Philosophy. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar