Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Contributors
- Foreword
- Introduction
- Part I Theoretical and Biological Foundations
- Part II Language, Communication, Social Cognition, and Awareness
- Part III Symbols and Tools throughout the Life Span
- 11 Private Pointing and Private Speech: Developing Parallelisms
- 12 Symbols as Tools in the Development of Executive Function
- 13 On the Persistence of Private Speech: Empirical and Theoretical Considerations
- 14 Private Speech beyond Childhood: Testing the Developmental Hypothesis
- Part IV Motivational and Educational Applications
- Index
- References
11 - Private Pointing and Private Speech: Developing Parallelisms
from Part III - Symbols and Tools throughout the Life Span
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 July 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Contributors
- Foreword
- Introduction
- Part I Theoretical and Biological Foundations
- Part II Language, Communication, Social Cognition, and Awareness
- Part III Symbols and Tools throughout the Life Span
- 11 Private Pointing and Private Speech: Developing Parallelisms
- 12 Symbols as Tools in the Development of Executive Function
- 13 On the Persistence of Private Speech: Empirical and Theoretical Considerations
- 14 Private Speech beyond Childhood: Testing the Developmental Hypothesis
- Part IV Motivational and Educational Applications
- Index
- References
Summary
Pointing is a quintessentially communicative gesture in humans. However, in this chapter we claim that pointing, like the most quintessential of human communicative tools, speech, also has private cognitive functions from its beginnings in infancy and childhood. We explore the parallelisms between private pointing and private speech from a neo-Vygotskian perspective reviewing a series of studies that empirically support this notion.
SPEECH AND GESTURES
In the past 2 decades it has been claimed that speech and gestures form a single and unified communicative system (Kendon, 2004; McNeill, 1985, 1992, 1998, 1999). According to McNeill (1999), this communicative system is formed by gestures and speech because the thought that the speaker wants to transmit originally includes categorical and imaginary aspects. According to him, “rather than adjuncts to language, gestures that integrate with speech are part of language. Such gestures show that language is more than its obvious linguistic content; it also has visuo-spatial content” (McNeill, 1985, pp. 16–17).
In support of this view, some relevant findings have been obtained by studying people with verbal or visual disabilities. For instance, deaf people can spontaneously assume the proper syntactic and segmented structure of language in their gestures. Therefore, when they are called to carry the full burden of communication, gestures can assume a languagelike form (Goldin-Meadow, 1982, 2002, 2005; Goldin-Meadow, McNeill, & Singleton, 1996).
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Private Speech, Executive Functioning, and the Development of Verbal Self-Regulation , pp. 153 - 162Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2009
References
- 12
- Cited by