Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×

Online ordering will be unavailable from 17:00 GMT on Friday, April 25 until 17:00 GMT on Sunday, April 27 due to maintenance. We apologise for the inconvenience.

Hostname: page-component-669899f699-2mbcq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-25T18:26:11.994Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Dialogic Thinking

from Part I - Theoretical and Biological Foundations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 July 2009

By
Charles Fernyhough
Edited by
Adam Winsler ,
Charles Fernyhough  and
Ignacio Montero
Adam Winsler
Affiliation:
George Mason University, Virginia
Charles Fernyhough
Affiliation:
University of Durham
Ignacio Montero
Affiliation:
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
Get access

Summary

The idea that language has a constitutive involvement in human cognition is currently enjoying a resurgence in popularity. One group of enthusiasts for this idea consists of philosophers who have addressed the capacity of symbols in natural language to structure our cognitive environments (Clark, 1998, 2006; Dennett, 1997), and thus “reshape the computational spaces” (Clark, 1998, p. 174) that must be negotiated in problem solving. Another group includes developmental psychologists who, influenced by the writings of such figures as Mead (1934), Luria (1961), and Vygotsky (1930–1935/1978, 1934/1987), have focused on the ontogenetic linkages between language and thought (e.g., Berk, 1992; Tomasello, Kruger, & Ratner, 1993; Wertsch, 1991). Vygotsky (1930–1935/1978, 1934/1987) argued that words constitute a special category of “psychological tools” which fundamentally transform our biological brain processes to create a new class of mediated higher mental functions. Yet despite a renewed interest in such cognitive conceptions of language (e.g., Carruthers, 2002), the effects of linguistic enculturation on individual brain functioning remain mysterious. We may be agreed about the potential of words in natural language to function as tools for cognition, but there has thus far been little progress toward understanding which properties of language might enable words to fulfill this function, and in providing cognitive models of the interfunctional (Vygotsky, 1934/1987) relations between language and thought.

In this chapter, I focus on one implication of a broadly Vygotskian cognitive conception of language: namely, that the language that “gets into the head” to transform our prelinguistic thought processes preserves one important feature of external language.

Type
Chapter
Information
Private Speech, Executive Functioning, and the Development of Verbal Self-Regulation , pp. 42 - 52
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Al-Namlah, A. S., Fernyhough, C., & Meins, E. (2006). Sociocultural influences on the development of verbal mediation: Private speech and phonological recoding in Saudi Arabian and British samples. Developmental Psychology, 42, 117–131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baddeley, A., Chincotta, D., & Adlam, A. (2001). Working memory and the control of action: Evidence from task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 641–657.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bakhtin, M. M. (1984). Problems of Dostoevky's poetics (Emerson, C., Ed. & Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays (Emerson, C. and Holquist, M., Eds.; McGee, V. W., Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Barresi, J., & Moore, C. (1996). Intentional relations and social understanding. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19, 107–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, F. (1958). Thinking. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Behrend, D. A., Rosengren, K. S., & Perlmutter, M. (1989). A new look at children's private speech: The effects of age, task difficulty, and parent presence. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 12, 305–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berk, L. E. (1986). Relationship of elementary school children's private speech to behavioral accompaniment to task, attention, and task performance. Developmental Psychology, 22, 671–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berk, L. E. (1992). Children's private speech: An overview of theory and the status of research. In Díaz, R. M. & Berk, L. E. (Eds.), Private speech: From social interaction to self-regulation (pp. 17–53). Hove, UK: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Berk, L. E., & Garvin, R. A. (1984). Development of private speech among low-income Appalachian children. Developmental Psychology, 20, 271–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berk, L. E., & Spuhl, S. T. (1995). Maternal interaction, private speech, and task performance in preschool children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 10, 145–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bivens, J. A., & Berk, L. E. (1990). A longitudinal study of the development of elementary school children's private speech. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 36, 443–463.Google Scholar
Boden, M. A. (1990). The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
Bråten, S. (1988). Dialogic mind: The infant and adult in protoconversation. In Carvallo, M. (Ed.), Nature, cognition and system (Vol. 1, pp. 187–205). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carruthers, P. (1996). Language, thought and consciousness: An essay in philosophical psychology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carruthers, P. (2002). The cognitive functions of language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25, 657–726.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chafe, W. L. (1974). Language and consciousness. Language, 50, 111–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheyne, J. A., & Tarulli, D. (1999). Dialogue, difference and voice in the zone of proximal development. Theory & Psychology, 9, 5–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, A. (1998). Magic words: How language augments human cognition. In Carruthers, P. & Boucher, J. (Eds.), Language and thought: Interdisciplinary themes (pp. 162–183). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, A. (2006). Language, embodiment, and the cognitive niche. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 370–374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind (Active externalism). Analysis, 58, 7–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, A., & Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1993). The cognizer's innards: A psychological and philosophical perspective on the development of thought. Mind and Language, 8, 487–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (1991). Consciousness explained. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (1997). How to do other things with words. Philosophy (Suppl. 42), 219–235.Google Scholar
Feigenbaum, P. (1992). Development of the syntactic and discourse structures of private speech. In Díaz, R. M. & Berk, L. E. (Eds.), Private speech: From social interaction to self-regulation (pp. 181–198). Hove, UK: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Fernyhough, C. (1994). Social and private speech as determinants of early cognitive functioning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Fernyhough, C. (1996). The dialogic mind: A dialogic approach to the higher mental functions. New Ideas in Psychology, 14, 47–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernyhough, C. (2004). Alien voices and inner dialogue: Towards a developmental account of auditory verbal hallucinations. New Ideas in Psychology, 22, 49–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernyhough, C. (2005). What is internalised? Dialogic cognitive representations and the mediated mind. (Commentary on Tomasello et al.). Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 698–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernyhough, C. (2008). Getting Vygotskian about theory of mind: Mediation, dialogue, and the development of social understanding. Developmental Review, 28, 225–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernyhough, C. (in press). Vygotsky, Luria, and the social brain. In Carpendale, J., Iarocci, G., Müller, U., Sokol, B., & Young, A. (Eds.), Self- and social-regulation: Exploring the relations between social interaction, social cognition, and the development of executive functions. Oxford University Press.
Fernyhough, C., & Fradley, E. (2005). Private speech on an executive task: Relations with task difficulty and task performance. Cognitive Development, 20, 103–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fields, C. (2002). Why do we talk to ourselves?Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 14, 255–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Findlay, A. (1937). A hundred years of chemistry. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Furrow, D. (1984). Social and private speech at two years. Child Development, 55, 355–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furrow, D. (1992). Developmental trends in the differentiation of social and private speech. In Díaz, R. M. & Berk, L. E. (Eds.), Private speech: From social interaction to self-regulation (pp. 143–158). Hove, UK: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Galotti, K. M. (1989). Approaches to studying formal and everyday reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 331–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Goldin-Meadow, S., & Zheng, M.-Y. (1998). Thought before language: The expression of motion events prior to the impact of a conventional language model. In Carruthers, P. & Boucher, J. (Eds.), Language and thought: Interdisciplinary themes (pp. 26–54). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, S. (1981). The integration of verbal and motor behavior in preschool children. Child Development, 52, 280–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goudena, P. P. (1992). The problem of abbreviation and internalization of private speech. In Díaz, R. M. & Berk, L. E. (Eds.), Private speech: From social interaction to self-regulation (pp. 215–224). Hove, UK: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Harrington, D. M., Block, J. H., & Block, J. (1987). Testing aspects of Carl Rogers's theory of creative environments: Child-rearing antecedents of creative potential in young adolescents. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 851–856.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hermans, H. J. M. (1996). Voicing the self: From information processing to dialogical interchange. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 31–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hermans, H. J. M. (2002). The dialogical self as a society of mind. Theory and Psychology, 12, 147–160.Google Scholar
Hermans, H. J. M., & Kempen, H. J. G. (1993). The dialogical self: Meaning as movement. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hermans, H. J. M., & Kempen, H. J. G. (1995). Body, mind and culture: The dialogical nature of mediated action. Culture and Psychology, 1, 103–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hermans, H. J. M., Kempen, H. J. G., & Loon, R. J. P. (1992). The dialogical self: Beyond individualism and rationalism. American Psychologist, 47, 23–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hermer-Vazquez, L., Spelke, E. S., & Katsnelson, A. S. (1999). Sources of flexibility in human cognition: Dual-task studies of space and language. Cognitive Psychology, 39, 3–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobson, R. P. (1993). Autism and the development of mind. Hove, UK: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hobson, R. P. (2002). The cradle of thought: Exploring the origins of thinking. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Holquist, M. (1990). Dialogism: Bakhtin and his world. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, C., & Russell, J. (1993). Autistic children's difficulty with mental disengagement from an object: Its implications for theories of autism. Developmental Psychology, 29, 498–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurlburt, R. T. (1990). Sampling normal and schizophrenic inner experience. New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1988). The computer and the mind. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Jones, S. R., & Fernyhough, C. (2007). Neural correlates of inner speech and auditory verbal hallucinations: A critical review and theoretical integration. Clinical Psychology Review, 27, 140–154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Joseph, R. M., Steele, S. D., Meyer, E., & Tager-Flusberg, H. (2005). Self-ordered pointing in children with autism: Failure to use verbal mediation in the service of working memory?Neuropsychologia, 43, 1400–1411.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kohlberg, L., Yaeger, J., & Hjertholm, E. (1968). Private speech: Four studies and a review of theories. Child Development, 39, 691–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuhn, D., & Udell, W. (2003). The development of argument skills. Child Development, 74, 1245–1260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawrence, J. A., & Valsiner, J. (1993). Conceptual roots of internalization: From transmission to transformation. Human Development, 36, 150–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodge, D. (1990). After Bakhtin: Essays on fiction and criticism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Luria, A. R. (1961). The role of speech in the regulation of normal and abnormal behavior (Tizard, J., Ed.). Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Marková, I. (1987). On the interaction of opposites in psychological processes. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 17, 279–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society from the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Meins, E., Fernyhough, C., Fradley, E., & Tuckey, M. (2001). Rethinking maternal sensitivity: Mothers' comments on infants' mental processes predict security of attachment at 12 months. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, 637–648.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meins, E., Fernyhough, C., Russell, J., & Clark-Carter, D. (1998). Security of attachment as a predictor of symbolic and mentalising abilities: A longitudinal study. Social Development, 7, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meins, E., & Russell, J. (1997). Security and symbolic play: The relation between security of attachment and executive capacity. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 15, 63–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norman, D. A., & Shallice, T. (1980). Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behavior. University of California at San Diego CHIP Report No. 99.Google Scholar
Pellegrini, A. D. (1981). The development of preschoolers' private speech. Journal of Pragmatics, 5, 445–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piaget, J. (1995). Sociological studies (Smith, L., Ed.). London: Routledge. (Original work published 1977)Google Scholar
Plato (1953). The dialogues of Plato (Jowett, B., Ed.). Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
Radzikhovskii, L. A. (1991). Dialogue as a unit of analysis of consciousness. Soviet Psychology, 29, 8–21.Google Scholar
Russell, J., Jarrold, C., & Hood, B. (1999). Two intact executive capacities in children with autism: Implications for the core executive dysfunctions in the disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 29, 103–112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sacks, O. (1989). Seeing voices. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Spelke, E. S. (2000). Core knowledge. American Psychologist, 55, 1233–1243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tappan, M. B. (1997). Language, culture, and moral development: A Vygotskian perspective. Developmental Review, 17, 78–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M. (1996). The child's contribution to culture: A commentary on Toomela. Culture and Psychology, 2, 307–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasello, M., Kruger, A. C., & Ratner, H. H. (1993). Cultural learning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16, 495–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geert, P. (1998). A dynamic systems model of basic developmental mechanisms: Piaget, Vygotsky, and beyond. Psychological Review, 105, 634–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Voloshinov, V. N. (1986). Marxism and the philosophy of language (Matejka, L. & Titunik, I. R., Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1929)Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (Cole, M., John-Steiner, V., Scribner, S. & Souberman, E., Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1930, 1933, and 1935)Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech. In The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky (Vol. 1). New York: Plenum. (Original work published 1934)Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1997). Genesis of higher mental functions. In Rieber, R. W. (Ed.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky (Vol. 4). New York: Plenum. (Original work published 1931)Google Scholar
Wertsch, J. V. (1979). The regulation of human action and the given – new organization of private speech. In Zivin, G. (Ed.), The development of self-regulation through private speech. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Wertsch, J. V. (1980). The significance of dialogue in Vygotsky's account of social, egocentric and inner speech. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 5, 150–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wertsch, J. V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Hemel Hempstead, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Wertsch, J. V., & Stone, C. A. (1985). The concept of internalization in Vygotsky's account of the genesis of the higher mental functions. In Wertsch, J. V. (Ed.), Culture, communication and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Whitehouse, A. J. O., Maybery, M. T., & Durkin, K. (2006). Inner speech impairments in autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47, 857–865.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wing, L. (1981). Language, social and cognitive impairments in autism and severe mental retardation. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 11, 31–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winsler, A., Abar, B., Feder, M. A., Schunn, C. D., & Rubio, D. A. (2007). Private speech and executive functioning among high-functioning children with autistic spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37, 1617–1635.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winsler, A., León, J. R., Wallace, B. A., Carlton, M. P., & Willson-Quayle, A. (2003). Private speech in preschool children: Developmental stability and change, across-task consistency, and relations with classroom behaviour. Journal of Child Language, 30, 583–608.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winsler, A., & Díaz, R. M. (1995). Private speech in the classroom: The effects of activity type, presence of others, classroom context, and mixed-age grouping. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 18, 463–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winsler, A., Díaz, R. M., Atencio, D. J., McCarthy, E. M., & Adams Chabay, L. (2000). Verbal self-regulation over time in preschool children at risk for attention and behavior problems. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 41, 875–886.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winsler, A., Díaz, R. M., McCarthy, E. M., Atencio, D. J., & Adams Chabay, L. (1999). Mother-child interaction, private speech, and task performance in preschool children with behavior problems. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 40, 891–904.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winsler, A., & Naglieri, J. (2003). Overt and covert verbal problem-solving strategies: Developmental trends in use, awareness, and relations with task performance in children aged 5 to 17. Child Development, 74, 659–678.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zelazo, P. D., Müller, U., Frye, D., & Marcovitch, S. (2003). The development of executive function in early childhood. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 274 (68, No. 3).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×