Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Zuckerman's Dilemma: An Introduction
- 2 At the Monument to General Meade or On the Difference between Beliefs and Benefits
- 3 Should Preferences Count?
- 4 Value in Use and in Exchange or What Does Willingness to Pay Measure?
- 5 The Philosophical Common Sense of Pollution
- 6 On the Value of Wild Ecosystems
- 7 Carrying Capacity and Ecological Economics
- 8 Cows Are Better Than Condos or How Economists Help Solve Environmental Problems
- 9 The View from Quincy Library or Civic Engagement in Environmental Problem Solving
- Notes
- Index
6 - On the Value of Wild Ecosystems
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 December 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Zuckerman's Dilemma: An Introduction
- 2 At the Monument to General Meade or On the Difference between Beliefs and Benefits
- 3 Should Preferences Count?
- 4 Value in Use and in Exchange or What Does Willingness to Pay Measure?
- 5 The Philosophical Common Sense of Pollution
- 6 On the Value of Wild Ecosystems
- 7 Carrying Capacity and Ecological Economics
- 8 Cows Are Better Than Condos or How Economists Help Solve Environmental Problems
- 9 The View from Quincy Library or Civic Engagement in Environmental Problem Solving
- Notes
- Index
Summary
Mr. Douglas Tomkins, founder of two clothing companies, North Face and Esprit, says he “made way too much money” in these businesses. “Before I was a businessman, I was a mountaineer, and I came to know and love some of the world's wildest, most beautiful remaining places.” In 1990, he says, “I sold all my business interests, immersed myself in the literature of deep ecology[,] … and have for the last twelve years spent virtually all my resources – time and money – to protect wild nature.”
Tomkins has purchased about 800,000 acres of land in Chile to form a nature reserve protecting, among many other natural wonders, about 35 percent of Chile's remaining alerce, a gigantic tree that can live for four thousand years. The wilderness forests could have been harvested for pulp. Some of the land, once clear-cut, might have been farmed to provide fresh produce for winter consumption in the United States. Fjords there might have served as sites for salmon aquaculture. According to Adriana Delpiano, Chile's Minister of National Property, “Chile already has 2.5 million acres of national parks, and we don't need any more.” She and others complain that Tomkin's nature reserve ties up too much resource-rich “land that could be used for development.”
An Economic Rationale for Preservation
In the United States, the conflict between preservation and development is an old story. For more than a century, preservationists have offered ethical and spiritual rather than economic arguments for protecting natural areas.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Price, Principle, and the Environment , pp. 126 - 153Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2004