Part I - Pragmatics in Action
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 September 2022
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Pragmatics in English Language Learning , pp. 27 - 140Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022
References
References
Alcón-Soler, E. (2015). Learning How to Request in an Instructed Learning Context. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Barron, A. (2003). Acquisition in Interlanguage Pragmatics: Learning How to Do Things with Words in a Study Abroad Context. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barron, A. (2019). Pragmatic development and stay abroad. Journal of Pragmatics, 146, 43–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biesenbach-Lucas, S. (2006). Making requests in e-mail: do cyber-consultations entail directness? Toward conventions in a new medium. In Bardovi-Harlig, K., Félix Brasdefer, C., & Omar, A., eds., Pragmatics Language Learning, Vol. 11, Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press, pp. 81–107.Google Scholar
Biesenbach-Lucas, S. (2007). Students writing e-mails to faculty: An examination of e-politeness among native and non-native speakers of English. Language Learning and Technology, 11(2), 59–81.Google Scholar
Bjørge, A. K. (2007). Power distance in English lingua franca email communication. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 60–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., & Kasper, G. (1989). Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies, Vol. 31. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Pub.Google Scholar
Bou-Franch, P. (2011). Openings and closings in Spanish email conversations. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(6), 1772–1785.Google Scholar
Chen, C-F E. (2006). The development of e-mail literacy: From writing to peers to writing to authority figures. Language Learning and Technology, 10(2), 35–55.Google Scholar
Chen, Y-S. (2015). Developing Chinese EFL learners’ email literacy through requests to faculty. Journal of Pragmatics, 75, 131–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Y-S., Rau, D-H.V., & Rau, G. (2016). Email Discourse among Chinese Using English as a Lingua Franca. Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
Cole, S., & Anderson, A. (2001). Requests by young Japanese: A longitudinal study. The Language Teacher, 25(8), 7–11.Google Scholar
Collentine, J., & Freed, B. F. (2004). Learning context and its effects on second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 153–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2010). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Davies, J. M. (2007). Resistance to L2 pragmatics in the Australian ESL context. Language Learning, 57(4), 611–649.Google Scholar
Duff, P. A. (2012). Identity, agency, and second language acquisition. In Gass, S. M. & Mackey, A. (eds.) The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. London: Routledge, pp. 410–426.Google Scholar
Economidou-Kogetsidis, M. (2008). Internal and external mitigation in interlanguage request production: The case of Greek learners of English. Journal of Politeness Research, 4(1), 111–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Economidou-Kogetsidis, M. (2011). ‘Please answer me as soon as possible’: Pragmatic failure in non-native speakers’ e-mail requests to faculty. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(13), 3193–3215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Economidou-Kogetsidis, M. (2018), ‘Mr Paul, please inform me accordingly’: Address forms, directness and degree of imposition in L2 emails. Pragmatics, 28(4), 489–515.Google Scholar
Eslami, Z. R., Kim, H., Wright, K. L., & Burlbaw, L. M. (2014). The role of learner subjectivity in Korean English language learners’ pragmatic choices. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics, 10(1), 117–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halenko, N., & Jones, C. (2011). Teaching pragmatic awareness of spoken requests to Chinese EAP learners in the UK: Is explicit instruction effective? System, 39 (2), 240–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halenko, N., & Jones, C. (2017). Explicit instruction of spoken requests: an examination of pre-departure instruction and the study abroad environment. System, 68, 26–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halenko, N., & Winder, L. (2021). Experts and novices: Examining academic email requests to faculty and developmental change during study abroad. In Economidou-Kogetsidis, M., Savic, M. and Halenko, N. and Winder, L. (eds.), Email Pragmatics and Second Language Learners. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 101–128.Google Scholar
Hendriks, B. (2010). An experimental study of native speaker perceptions of non-native request modification in emails in English. Intercultural Pragmatics, 7(2), 221–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishihara, N. (2019). Understanding English language learners’ pragmatic resistance. In Gao, X. (ed.), Second Handbook of English Language Teaching. Cham: Springer, pp. 621–641.Google Scholar
Ishihara, N., & Tarone, E. (2009). Subjectivity and pragmatic choice in L2 Japanese: emulating and resisting pragmatic norms. In Taguchi, N. (ed.), Pragmatic Competence. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 101–128.Google Scholar
Iwasaki, N. (2011). Learning L2 Japanese ‘politeness’ and ‘impoliteness’: Young American men’s dilemmas during study abroad. Japanese Language and Literature, 45, 67–106.Google Scholar
Kecskes, I. (2003). Situation-bound Utterances in L1 and L2. Studies on Language Acquisition, Vol. 19. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, C. F. K. (2010). Written requests in emails sent by adult Chinese learners of English. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 17(1), 58–72.Google Scholar
Lewin-Jones, J., & Mason, V. (2014). Understanding style, language and etiquette in email communication in higher education: A survey. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 19(1), 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, S. (2014). The effects of different levels of linguistic proficiency on the development of L2 Chinese request production during study abroad. System, 45, 103–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, W. (2018). Pragmatic Transfer and Development: Evidence from EFL Learners in China. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, Y-H. (2009). Query preparatory modals: Cross-linguistic and cross-situational variations in request modification. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(8), 1636–1656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merrison, A. J., Wilson, J., Davies, B., & Haugh, M. (2012). Getting stuff done: Comparing e-mail requests from students in higher education in Britain and Australia. Journal of Pragmatics, 44, 1077–1098.Google Scholar
Pérez-Vidal, C., & Shively, R. (2019). L2 pragmatic development in study abroad settings. In Taguchi, N. (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition and Pragmatics. Abingdon and New York: Routledge, pp. 355–371.Google Scholar
Ren, W. (2017). Pragmatics and politeness in Chinese graduate students’ gratitude emails in English. In Xu, Z. & He, D. (eds.), Researching Chinese English: The State of the Art. Singapore: Springer, pp. 109–124.Google Scholar
Sánchez-Hernández, A. (2018). A mixed-methods study of the impact of sociocultural adaptation on the development of pragmatic production. System, 75, 93–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savić, M. (2018). Lecturer perceptions of im/politeness and in/appropriateness in student e-mail requests: A Norwegian perspective. Journal of Pragmatics, 124, 52–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schauer, G. A. (2006). Pragmatic awareness in ESL and EFL contexts: Contrast and development. Language Learning, 56(2), 269–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schauer, G. A. (2009). Interlanguage Pragmatic Development: The Study Abroad Context. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, H., & Wang, J. (2019). Culture, context, and concerns about face: Synergistic insights from pragmatics and social psychology. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 38(4), 423–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, H., & Wang, J. (2020). Establishing professional intercultural relations: Chinese perceptions of behavioural success in a Sino-American exchange visit. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 49(6), 499–519.Google Scholar
Taguchi, N. (2012). Context, Individual Differences and Pragmatic Competence. New York and Bristol: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taguchi, N. (2015). ‘Contextually’ speaking: A survey of pragmatic learning abroad, in class and online. System, 48, 3–20.Google Scholar
Taguchi, N. (2019). Second language acquisition and pragmatics: An overview. In Taguchi, N. (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition and Pragmatics. London: Routledge, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
Tseng, C-T H. (2016). An Interlanguage Pragmatic Study on Taiwanese EFL Learners’ Email Request. The Asian Conference on Language Learning 2016 Official Conference Proceedings, Aichi, Japan: pp. 41–57.Google Scholar
Wang, J. (forthcoming). Rapport management and evaluation in intercultural email communication. In Hinton, P. & McConachy, T. (eds.), Negotiating Intercultural Relations. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Wang, J., & Halenko, N. (2019a). Second language pragmatics. A Special Issue of East Asian Pragmatics, 4(1), 1–9.Google Scholar
Wang, J., & Halenko, N. (2019b). Longitudinal benefits of pre-departure pragmatics instruction for study abroad: Chinese as a second/foreign language. East Asian Pragmatics, 4(1), 87–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, J., & Spencer-Oatey, H. (2015). The gains and losses of face in ongoing intercultural interaction: A case study of Chinese participant perspectives. Journal of Pragmatics, 89, 50–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, J., & Spencer-Oatey, H. (2015). The gains and losses of face in ongoing intercultural interaction: A case study of Chinese participant perspectives. Journal of Pragmatics, 89, 50–65.Google Scholar
Wang, V. X. (2011). Making Requests by Chinese EFL Learners. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodfield, H. (2012). ‘I think maybe I want to lend the notes from you.’ Development of request modification in graduate learners. In Economidou-Kogetsidis, M. & Woodfield, H. (eds.), Interlanguage Request Modification. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 9–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yates, L. (2010). Pragmatic challenges for second language learners. In Trosborg, A. (ed.), Pragmatics across Languages and Cultures. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter, pp. 287–308.Google Scholar
Zhang, Y. (1995). Indirectness in Chinese requesting. In Kasper, G. (ed.), Pragmatics of Chinese as Native and Target Language. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawai’i Press, pp. 69–118.Google Scholar
Zhu, W. (2012). Polite requestive strategies in emails: An investigation of pragmatic competence of Chinese EFL learners. RELC Journal, 43(2), 217–238.Google Scholar
References
Achiba, M. (2003). Learning to Request in a Second Language: Child Interlanguage Pragmatics. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (1999). Exploring the interlanguage of interlanguage pragmatics: a research agenda for acquisitional pragmatics. Language Learning, 49(4), 677–713.Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2006). On the role of formulas in the acquisition of L2 pragmatics. In Bardovi-Harlig, K., Félix-Brasdefer, C., & Alwiya, O. (eds.), Pragmatics and Language Learning, vol. 11. National Foreign Language Resource Center, Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, pp. 1–28.Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Bastos, M. (2011). Proficiency, length of stay, and intensity of interaction, and the acquisition of conventional expressions in L2 pragmatics. Intercultural Pragmatics, 8(3), 347–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barron, A. (2003). Acquisition in Interlanguage Pragmatics: Learning How to Do Things with Words in a Study Abroad Context. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bella, S. (2012). Pragmatic development in a foreign language: A study of Greek FL requests. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(13), 1917–1947.Google Scholar
Bella, S. (2014). Developing the ability to refuse: A cross-sectional study of Greek FL refusals. Journal of Pragmatics, 61, 35–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bella, S., & Ogiermann, E. (2019). An intergenerational perspective on im/politeness in Greece. Journal of Politeness Research, 15(2), 163–193.Google Scholar
Billmyer, K., & Varghese, M. (2000). Investigating instrument-based pragmatic variability: Effects of enhancing discourse completion tests. Applied Linguistics, 21(4), 517–552.Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., & Kasper, G. (1989). Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
Brown, P., & Levinson, L. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1–47.Google Scholar
Cole, S., & Anderson, A. (2001). Requests by young Japanese: A longitudinal study. The Language Teacher Online, 25(8). www.jaltpublications.org/tlt/articles/2001/08/anderson.Google Scholar
Council of Europe (2018). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR). www.coe.int/en/web/common-european-framework-reference-languages.Google Scholar
Economidou-Kogetsidis, M. (2005). ‘Yes, tell me please, what time is the midday flight from Athens arriving?’: Telephone service encounters and politeness. Journal of Intercultural Pragmatics, 2(3), 253–273.Google Scholar
Economidou-Kogetsidis, M. (2008). Internal and external mitigation in interlanguage request production: The case of Greek learners of English. Journal of Politeness Research, 4(1), 111–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Economidou-Kogetsidis, M. (2011). ‘Please answer me as soon as possible’: Pragmatic failure in non-native speakers’ e-mail requests to faculty. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(13), 3193–3215.Google Scholar
Economidou-Kogetsidis, M. (2018) ‘Mr Paul, please inform me accordingly’: Address forms, directness and degree of imposition in L2 emails. Pragmatics, 28(4), 489–515.Google Scholar
Economidou-Kogetsidis, M., & Halenko, N. ((2022). Developing spoken requests during UK study abroad: A longitudinal look at Japanese learners of English. Study Abroad Research in Second Language Acquisition and International Education, 7(1), 24–54.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (1992). Learning to communicate in the classroom: a study of two learners requests. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14(1), 1–23.Google Scholar
Faerch, C., & Kasper, G. (1989). Internal and external modification in interlanguage request realization. In Blum-Kulka, S, House, J., & Kasper, G (eds.), Cross-cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies, Norwood, NJ: Ablex, 221–247.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
Félix-Brasdefer, C. (2007). Pragmatic development in the Spanish as a FL classroom: A cross-sectional study of learner requests, Intercultural Pragmatics, 4(2), 253–286.Google Scholar
Goy, E., Zeyrek, D., & Otꞔu, B. (2012). Developmental patterns in internal modification of requests. In Economidou-Kogetsidis, M. and Woodfield, H. (eds.), Interlanguage Request Modification. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 51–86.Google Scholar
Grice, P. (1975). Logic and Conversation. In Cole, P. & Morgan, J. (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, Volume 3. Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press, pp. 41–58.Google Scholar
Hassall, T. (1997). Requests by Australian Learners of Indonesia. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Australian National University, Canberra.Google Scholar
Hassall, T. (2003). Requests by Australian learners of Indonesian. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(12), 1903–1928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, T. (1997). The Development of Pragmatic Competence in an EFL Context. Doctoral dissertation. Temple University, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Kasper, G. (2000). Data collection in pragmatics research. In Spencer-Oatey, H. (ed.), Culturally Speaking: Managing Rapport through Talk across Cultures. London: Continuum, pp. 316–369.Google Scholar
Kasper, G., & Rose, K. (2002). Pragmatic Development in a Second Language. Madison: University of Michigan and Blackwell.Google Scholar
Otꞔu, B., & Zeyrek, D. (2008). Development of requests: A study on Turkish Learners of English. In Puetz, M. & Aertslaer, J. N. (eds.), Developing Contrastive Pragmatics: Interlanguage and Cross-Cultural Perspectives. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter, pp. 265–299.Google Scholar
Pavlidou, T. (1994). Contrasting German-Greek politeness and the consequences. Journal of Pragmatics, 21(5), 487–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavlidou, T. (1997). The last five turns: Preliminary remarks on closings in Greek and German telephone calls. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 126, 145–162.Google Scholar
Pavlidou, T. (1998). Greek and German telephone closings: Patterns of confirmation and agreement. Pragmatics, 8(1), 79–94.Google Scholar
Roever, C., Stanley Wang, S., & Brophy, S. (2014). Learner background factors and learning of second language pragmatics. IRAL – International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 52(4), 377–40.Google Scholar
Rose, K. (2000). An exploratory cross-sectional study of interlanguage pragmatic development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(1), 27–67.Google Scholar
Rose, K. (2009). Interlanguage pragmatic development in Hong Kong, phase 2. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(11), 2345–2364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savić, M. (2015). ‘Can I very please borrow it?’: Request development in young Norwegian EFL learners. Intercultural Pragmatics, 12(4), 443–480.Google Scholar
Savić, M., Economidou-Kogetsidis, M., & Myrset, A. (2021). Young Greek Cypriot and Norwegian EFL learners: Pragmalinguistic development in request production. Journal of Pragmatics, 180, 15–34.Google Scholar
Scarcella, R. (1979). On speaking politely in a second language. In Yorio, C., Perkins, K., & Schachter, J. (eds.), On TESOL’79: The Learner in Focus., Washington, DC: TESOL, pp. 275–287.Google Scholar
Schauer, G. (2004). ‘May you speak louder maybe’? Interlanguage pragmatic development in requests. In Foster-Cohen, H. S., Sharwood Smith, M., Sorace, A., & Mitsuhiko, O. (eds.), EUROSLA Yearbook. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 253–273.Google Scholar
Schauer, G. (2006). The development of ESL learners’ pragmatic competence: A longitudinal investigation of awareness and production. In Bardovi-Harlig, K., Félix-Brasdefer, C., & Alwiya, O. S. (eds.), Pragmatics and Language Learning, Manoa, HI: Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center, University of Hawaii, pp. 135–163.Google Scholar
Schauer, G. (2009). Interlanguage Pragmatic Development: The Study Abroad Context. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Schmidt, R. (1983). Interaction, acculturation, and the acquisition of communicative competence: A case study of an adult. In Wolfson, N. & Judd, E. (eds.), Sociolinguistics and Language Acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House, pp. 137–174.Google Scholar
Sifianou, M. (1989). On the telephone again! Differences in telephone behavior. Language in Society, 18(4), 524–544.Google Scholar
Sifianou, M. (1992). Politeness Phenomena in England and Greece. A Cross-Cultural Perspective. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taguchi, N. (2012). Context, Individual Differences and Pragmatic Competence. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Takahashi, T., & Beebe, L. (1987). The development of pragmatic competence by Japanese learners of English. JALT Journal, 8(2), 131–155.Google Scholar
Triandis, C. H., & Vassiliou, V. (1972) A comparative analysis of subjective culture. In Triandis, H. C. (ed.), The Analysis of Subjective Culture, Comparative Studies in Behavioral Science. New York: Wiley, pp. 299–335.Google Scholar
Trosborg, A. (1995). Interlanguage Pragmatics: Requests, Complaints and Apologies. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Vassiliou, V., Triandis, H., Vassiliou, G., & McGuire, H. (1972). Interpersonal contact and stereotyping. In Triandis, H. C. (ed.), The Analysis of Subjective Culture, Comparative Studies in Behavioral Science. New York: Wiley, pp. 89–115.Google Scholar
Woodfield, H. (2008). Interlanguage requests: a contrastive study. In Puetz, M. & Neff-van Aertselaer, J. (eds.), Developing Contrastive Pragmatics: Interlanguage and Cross-Cultural Pragmatics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 231–264.Google Scholar
Woodfield, H. (2012). ‘I think maybe I want to lend the notes from you’: Development of request modification in graduate learners. In Economidou-Kogetsidis, M. & Woodfield, H. (eds.), Interlanguage Request Modification. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 9–49.Google Scholar
Woodfield, H., & Economidou-Kogetsidis, M. (2010). ‘I just need more time’: A study of native and non-native students’ requests to faculty for late submission. Multilingua, 29(1), 77–118.Google Scholar
References
Ädel, A. (2014). Selecting quantitative data for qualitative analysis: A case study connecting a lexicogrammatical pattern to rhetorical moves. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 16, 68–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alcón-Soler, E. (2013). Pragmatic variation in British and International English language users’ e-mail communication: A focus on requests. Revista Espanola de Linguistica Aplicada, 26, 25–44.Google Scholar
Alcón-Soler, E. (2015). Teachers’ perceptions of email requests: insights for teaching pragmatics in study abroad contexts. In Gesuato, S., Bianchi, F., & Cheng, W. (eds.), Teaching, Learning and Investigating Pragmatics: Principles, Methods and Practices. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 13–31.Google Scholar
Alemi, M., Eslami, Z. R., & Rezanejad, A. (2014). Rating EFL learners’ interlanguage pragmatic competence by non-native English speaking teachers. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 171–174.Google Scholar
Alemi, M., & Khanlarzadeh, N. (2017). Native and non-native teachers’ pragmatic criteria for rating request speech act: The case of American and Iranian EFL teachers. Applied Research on English Language, 6(1), 67–84.Google Scholar
Alemi, M., & Rezanejad, A. (2014). Native and non-native English teachers’ rating criteria and variation in the assessment of L2 pragmatic production: the speech act of compliment. Issues in Language Teaching (ILT), 3(1), 65–88.Google Scholar
Alemi, M., & Tajeddin, Z. (2013). Pragmatic rating of L2 refusal: Criteria of native and nonnative English teachers. TESL Canada Journal/Revue TESL du Canada, 30(7), 63–81.Google Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Shin, S.-Y. (2014). Expanding traditional testing measures with tasks from L2 pragmatics research. Iranian Journal of Language Testing, 4(1), 26–49.Google Scholar
Beason, L. (2001). Ethos and error: How business people react to errors. College, Composition and Communication, 53(1), 33–64.Google Scholar
Bektas-Cetinkaya, Y. (2012). Pre-service EFL teachers’ pragmatic competence. The Turkish case. International Journal of Language Studies, 6(2), 107–122.Google Scholar
Change, L. (2011). Interlanguage pragmatic development: The relation between pragmalinguistic competence and sociopragmatic competence. Language Sciences, 33(5), 786–798.Google Scholar
Chen, H.-I. (2010). Contrastive learner corpus analysis of epistemic modality and interlanguage pragmatic competence in L2 writing. Arizona Working Papers in SLA & Teaching, 17, 27–51.Google Scholar
Chen, Y.-S., & Liu, J. (2016). Constructing a scale to assess L2 written speech act performance: WDCT and e-mail tasks. Language Assessment Quarterly, 13(3), 231–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chivarate, B. (2011). Perception of politeness in English requests by Thai EFL learners. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 17(2), 59–71.Google Scholar
Cohen, A. D. (2008). Teaching and assessing L2 pragmatics: What can we expect from learners? Language Teaching, 41(2), 213–235.Google Scholar
Cohen, A. D. (2014). Towards increased classroom assessment of pragmatic ability. Iranian Journal of Language Testing, 4(1), 5–25.Google Scholar
Cortes, V. (2013). ‘The purpose of this study is to’: Connecting lexical bundles and moves in research article introductions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12(1), 33–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culpeper, J., Marti, L., Mei, M., Nevala, M., & Schauer, G. (2010). Cross-cultural variation in the perception of impoliteness: A study of impoliteness events reported by students in England, China, Finland, Germany and Turkey. Intercultural Pragmatics, 7(4), 597–624.Google Scholar
DeWaard Dykstra, L. (2011). Reconceptualizing the goals for foreign language learning: the role of pragmatics instruction. In Scott, V. M. (ed.), AAUSC Volume 8: Principles and Practices of the ‘Standards’ in College Foreign Language Education. Boston, MA: Heinle Cengage, pp. 86–105.Google Scholar
Economidou-Kogetsidis, M. (2011). ‘Please answer me as soon as possible’: Pragmatic failure in non-native speakers’ e-mail requests to faculty. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(13), 3193–3215.Google Scholar
Economidou-Kogetsidis, M. (2015). Teaching email politeness in the EFL/ESL classroom. ELT Journal, 69(4), 415–424.Google Scholar
Economidou-Kogetsidis, M. (2016). Variation in evaluations of the (im)politeness of emails from L2 learners and perceptions of the personality of their senders. Journal of Pragmatics, 106, 1–19.Google Scholar
Eslami-Rasekh, Z. (2004). Face-keeping strategies in reaction to complaints. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 14(1), 181–197.Google Scholar
Gleason, J. B., & Perlmann, R. Y. (1985). Acquiring social variation in speech. In Giles, H. & Clair, R. N. St. (eds.), Recent Advances in Language, Communication and Social Psychology. London: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 86–111.Google Scholar
Hacking, J. F. (2008). Socio-pragmatic competence in Russian: How input is not enough. In Katz, S. L. & Watzinger-Tharp, J. (eds.), Conceptions of L2 Grammar: Theoretical Approaches and their Application in the L2 Classroom. Boston, MA: Heinle Cengage, pp. 110–125.Google Scholar
Hartung, K. J., & Wilson, D. G. (2016). Conversational moves that matter: Bridging learning outcomes and patterns of speech in informal cross-organizational conversations among top-level learners. Adult Education Quarterly, 66(3), 254–272.Google Scholar
Hendriks, B. (2010). An experimental study of native speaker perceptions of non-native request modification in e-mails in English. Intercultural Pragmatics, 7(2), 221–255.Google Scholar
Henry, A., & Ho, D. G. E. (2010). The act of complaining in Brunei – then and now. Journal of Pragmatics, 42(3), 840–855.Google Scholar
Henry, A., & Roseberry, R. L. (2001). A narrow-angled corpus analysis of moves and strategies of the genre: ‘Letter of Application’. English for Specific Purposes, 20(2), 153–167.Google Scholar
Hudson, T., Detmer, E., & Brown, J. D. (1995). Developing Prototypic Measures of Cross-Cultural Pragmatics, Technical Report # 7. Manoa, HI: University of Hawai’i at Manoa: Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.Google Scholar
Hyland, F., & Hyland, K. (2001). Sugaring the pill: Praise and criticism in written feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(3), 185–212.Google Scholar
Ishihara, N. (2010). Assessing learners’ pragmatic ability in the classroom. In Tatsuki, D. & Houck, N. (eds.), Pragmatics: Teaching Speech Acts. TESOL Classroom Practice Series, Alexandra, VA: TESOL, pp. 209–227.Google Scholar
Jeon, E. H., & Kaya, T. (2006). Effects of L2 instruction on interlanguage pragmatic development. A meta-analysis. In Norris, J. M. & Ortega, L. (eds.), Synthesizing Research on Language Teaching and Learning. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 165–211.Google Scholar
Jucker, A. H., Schneider, G., Taavitsainen, I., & Breustedt, B. (2008). Fishing for compliments: Precision and recall in corpus-linguistic compliment research. In Jucker, A. H. & Taavitsainen, I., eds., Speech Acts in the History of English. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 273–294.Google Scholar
Koike, D. A. (1996). Transfer of pragmatic competence and suggestions in Spanish foreign language learning. In Gass, S. M. & Neu, J. (eds.), Speech Acts Across Cultures, Vol. 11. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 257–281.Google Scholar
Koike, D. A., & Pearson, L. (2005). The effect of instruction and feedback in the development of pragmatic competence. System, 33(3), 481–501.Google Scholar
Kumar, V., & Stracke, E. (2007). An analysis of written feedback on a PhD thesis. Teaching in Higher Education, 12(4), 461–470.Google Scholar
Laughlin, V. T., Wain, J., & Schmidgall, J. (2015). Defining and Operationalizing the Construct of Pragmatic Competence: Review and Recommendations, Research Report ETS-RR-15-06.Google Scholar
Lumley, T. (2002). Assessment criteria in a large-scale writing test: What do they really mean to the raters? Language Testing, 19(3), 246–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pallotti, G. (2009). CAF: Defining, refining and differentiating constructs. Applied Linguistics, 30(4), 590–601.Google Scholar
Roever, C. (2011). Testing of second language pragmatics: Past and future. Language Testing, 28(4), 463–481.Google Scholar
Savić, M. (2018). Lecturer perceptions of im/politeness and in/appropriateness in student e-mail requests: A Norwegian perspective. Journal of Pragmatics, 124, 52–72.Google Scholar
Schauer, G. A. (2006). Pragmatic awareness in ESL and EFL contexts: Contrast and development. Language Learning, 56(2), 269–318.Google Scholar
Scher, S. J., & Darley, J. M. (1997). How effective are the things people say to apologise? Effects of the realization of the apology speech act. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 16(1), 127–140.Google Scholar
Sirikhan, S., & Prapphal, K. (2011). Assessing pragmatic ability of Thai hotel management and tourism students in the context of hotel front office department. Asian EFL Journal Professional Teaching Articles 53, 72–94.Google Scholar
Spencer-Oatey, H. (2007). Theories of identity and the analysis of face. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(4), 639–656.Google Scholar
Sydorenko, T., Maynard, C., & Guntly, E. (2014). Rater behaviour when judging language learners’ pragmatic appropriateness in extended discourse. TESL Canada Journal/Revue TESL du Canada 19, 32(1), 19–41.Google Scholar
Sykes, J. M. (2010). (In)commensurable discourse: researchers and practitioners bring pragmatics to language learning. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 3(1), 253–263.Google Scholar
Taguchi, N. (2006). Analysis of appropriateness in a speech act of request. Pragmatics, 16(4), 513–533.Google Scholar
Taguchi, N. (2011a). Do proficiency and study-abroad experience affect speech act production? Analysis of appropriateness, accuracy, and fluency. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching (IRAL), 49(4), 265–293.Google Scholar
Taguchi, N. (2011b). Rater variation in the assessment of speech acts. Pragmatics, 21(3), 453–471.Google Scholar
Taguchi, N. (2011c). Pragmatic development as a dynamic, complex process: General patterns and case histories. The Modern Language Journal, 95(4), 605–627.Google Scholar
Tajeddin, Z., & Alemi, M. (2014). Criteria and bias in native English teachers’ assessment of L2 pragmatic appropriacy: content and FACETS analyses. Asia-Pacific Education Research, 23(3), 425–434.Google Scholar
Thomas, J. (1983). Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 91–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tseng, F.-P. (2011). Analyses of move structure and verb tense of research article abstracts in applied linguistics journals. International Journal of English Linguistics, 1(2), 27–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolfe, J., Shanmugaraj, N., & Sipe, J. (2016). Grammatical versus pragmatic error: Employer perceptions of nonnative and native English speakers. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 79(4), 397–415.Google Scholar
Yamashita, S. (2008). Investigating interlanguage pragmatic ability: What are we testing? In Alcón-Soler, E. & Martínez-Flor, A. (eds.), Investigating Pragmatics in Foreign Language Learning, Teaching and Testing, Bristol: Multilingual Matters, pp. 201–223.Google Scholar
References
Bernicot, J. (1991). French children’s conception of requesting: The development of metapragmatic knowledge. International Journal of Behavioural Development, 14(3), 285–304.Google Scholar
Bernicot, J., Laval, V., & Chaminaud, S. (2007). Nonliteral language forms in children: In what order are they acquired in pragmatics and metapragmatics? Journal of Pragmatics, 39(12), 2115–2132.Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., & Kasper, G., eds. (1989). Cross-Cultural Pragmatics: Requests and Apologies. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chiba, A. (2017). Investigating young learners’ L2 pragmatic competence in telling uncomfortable truths. In Brooks, G. (ed.), The 2016 PanSIG Journal. Tokyo: JALT, pp. 46–54.Google Scholar
Collins, A., Lockton, E., & Adams, C. (2014). Metapragmatic explication ability in children with typical language development: Development and validation of a novel clinical assessment. Journal of Communication Disorders, 52, 31–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cromdal, J. (1996). Pragmatic skills and awareness in bilinguals: Children’s directives in school contexts. Working Papers on Childhood and the Study of Children, 10, 1–38.Google Scholar
Dittrich, W., Johansen, T., & Kulinskaya, E. (2011). Norms and situational rules of address in English and Norwegian speakers. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(15), 3807–3821.Google Scholar
Eelen, G. (2001). A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester and Northampton, MA: St. Jerome Publishing.Google Scholar
Fretheim, T. (2005). Politeness in Norway: How can you be polite and sincere? In Hickey, L. & Stewart, M. (eds.), Politeness in Europe. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd, pp. 145–158.Google Scholar
Fukushima, S. (2003). Requests and Culture: Politeness in British English and Japanese, 3rd ed. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Hasselgreen, A. (2005). The new læreplan proposal for English – reading between the lines. Språk og språkundervisning, 2, 7–10.Google Scholar
Ishihara, N., & Chiba, A. (2014). Teacher-based or interactional?: Exploring assessment for children’s pragmatic development. Iranian Journal of Language Testing, 4(1), 84–112.Google Scholar
Kádár, D., & House, J. (2020). Ritual frames: A contrastive pragmatic approach. Pragmatics, 30(1), 142–168.Google Scholar
Krulatz, A. (2016). Competent non-native users of English? Requestive behaviour of Norwegian EFL teachers. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 15(4), 24–44.Google Scholar
Laval, V. (2003). Idiom comprehension and metapragmatic knowledge in French children. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(5), 723–739.Google Scholar
Lee, C. (2010). An exploratory study of the interlanguage pragmatic comprehension of young learners of English. Pragmatics, 20(3), 343–373.Google Scholar
McConachy, T. (2018). Developing Intercultural Perspectives on Language Use: Exploring Pragmatics and Culture in Foreign Language Learning. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Myrset, A., & Savić, M. (2021). ‘If an astronaut were on the moon …’: Eliciting metapragmatic data from young L2 learners. Applied Pragmatics, 3(2), 163–193.Google Scholar
Ogiermann, E., & Bella, S. (2020). An interlanguage study of request perspective: Evidence from German, Greek, Polish and Russian learners of English. Contrastive Pragmatics, 1(2), 180–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Kane, C. (2008). The development of participatory techniques: Facilitating children’s views about decisions which affect them. In Christensen, P. & James, A. (eds.), Research with Children: Perspectives and Practices, 2nd ed. New York and London: Routledge, pp. 125–155.Google Scholar
Pinter, A., & Zandian, S. (2014). ‘I don’t ever want to leave this room’: Benefits of researching ‘with’ children. ELT Journal, 68(1), 64–74.Google Scholar
Portolés, L. (2015). Multilingualism and Very Young Learners: An Analysis of Pragmatic Awareness and Language Attitudes. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Portolés, L., & Safont, P. (2018). Examining authentic and elicited data from a multilingual perspective. The real picture of child requestive behaviour in the L3 classroom. System, 75, 81–92.Google Scholar
Punch, S. (2002). Research with children: The same or different from research with adults? Childhood, 9(3), 321–341.Google Scholar
Røkaas, F. (2000). Potential for misunderstandings: Social interaction between Norwegians and Americans. In Isaksson, M. & Røkaas, F. A. (eds.), Conflicting Values: An Intercultural Challenge. Sandvika: Norwegian School of Management BI, pp. 111–129.Google Scholar
Savić, M. (2015). ‘Can I very please borrow it?’ Request development in young Norwegian EFL learners. Intercultural Pragmatics, 12(4), 443–480.Google Scholar
Savić, M. (2021). Co-constructing metapragmatic understandings: How young EFL learners talk about making requests. The European Journal of Applied Linguistics and TEFL, 10(2), 153–176.Google Scholar
Savić, M., Economidou-Kogetsidis, M., & Myrset, A. (2021). Young Greek Cypriot and Norwegian EFL learners: Pragmalinguistic development in request production. Journal of Pragmatics, 180, 15–34.Google Scholar
Savić, M., & Myrset, A. (2021). ‘But in England they’re certainly very polite, so you mustn’t forget that’: Young EFL learners making sense of pragmatic practices. In McConachy, T. & Liddicoat, A. J. (eds.), Teaching and Learning Second Language Pragmatics for Intercultural Understanding. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 40–59.Google Scholar
Savin-Baden, M., & Major, C. (2013). Qualitative Research: The Essential Guide to Theory and Practice. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stavanger municipality. (2017). Levekår i Stavanger: Geografisk Fordeling – Rapport nr. 7 [Living conditions in Stavanger: Geographical Distribution – Report no. 7], Stavanger: Stavanger Kommune.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, L. C., & Milosky, L. M. (1987). School-age children’s metapragmatic knowledge of requests and responses in the classroom. Topics in Language Disorders, 7(2), 61–70.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, L. C., Wilkinson, A. C., Spinelli, F., & Chiang, C. P. (1984). Metalinguistic knowledge of pragmatic rules in school-age children. Child Development, 55(6), 2130–2140.Google Scholar
Yates, L. (2010). Pragmatic challenges for second language learners. In Trosborg, A. (ed.), Pragmatics across Languages and Cultures. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, pp. 287–308.Google Scholar