Acharya, Amitav, 2004, ‘How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localisation and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism’, 58(2) International Organization, 239–275.Google Scholar

Acquaviva, Guido, 2008, ‘New Paths in International Criminal Justice? The Internal Rules of the Cambodian Extraordinary Chambers’, 6(1) Journal of International Criminal Justice, 129–151.Google Scholar

Adler, Emanuel, and Pouliot, Vincent, 2011, ‘International Practices’, 3(1) International Theory, 1–36.Google Scholar

Akhavan, Payam, 2013, ‘The Rise, and Fall, and Rise of International Criminal Justice’, 11(3) Journal of International Criminal Justice, 527–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aksenova, Marina, 2017, ‘Symbolism as a Constraint on International Criminal Law’, 30(2) Leiden Journal of International Law, 479–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ambos, Kai, 2012, ‘The First Judgment of the International Criminal Court (Prosecutor v. Lubanga): A Comprehensive Analysis of the Legal Issues’, 12(2) International Criminal Law Review, 115–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amnesty International, 2001, ‘Ensuring an Effective Trust Fund for Victims’, AI Index: IOR 40/005/2001. www.amnesty.org/en/documents/ior40/005/2001/en/ (accessed 17 July 2021).Google Scholar

Amnesty International, 2003, ‘Amnesty International’s Position and Concerns Regarding the Proposed Khmer Rouge Tribunal’, AI Index: ASA 23/005/2003. www.amnesty.org/en/documents/asa23/005/2003/en/ (accessed 18 July 2021).Google Scholar

Antkowiak, Thomas, 2011, ‘An Emerging Mandate for International Courts: Victim-Centred Remedies and Restorative Justice’, 47 Stanford Journal of International Law, 279–332.Google Scholar

Arthur, Paige, 2009, ‘How “Transitions” Reshaped Human Rights: A Conceptual History of Transitional Justice’, 31(2) Human Rights Quarterly, 321–367.Google Scholar

Arthur, Paige, and Yakinthou, Christalla, 2015, ‘Funding Transitional Justice: A Guide for Supporting Civil Society Engagement’, Public Action Research.Google Scholar

Asian International Justice Initiative, 2009, ‘Lessons Learned from the “Duch” Trial: A Comprehensive Review of the First Case before the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia’, AIJI KRT Trial Monitoring Group. www.eastwestcenter.org/sites/default/files/filemanager/Research_Program/Kelsall%20et%20al%202009.pdf (accessed 18 July 2021).Google Scholar

Association of the Khmer Rouge Victims in Cambodia (AKRVC), 2010, ‘Civil Party of Orphans Class Demands ECCC Inventory and Provincial Learning Centers’, Press Release, 23 July, Phnom Penh (on file with the author).Google Scholar

Atkinson, Rush, 2011, ‘Knights of the Court: The State Coalition Behind the International Criminal Court’, 7(1) Journal of International Law and International Relations, 66–103.Google Scholar

Aubry, Sylvain, and Henao-Trip, Maria Isabel, 2011, ‘Collective Reparations and the International Criminal Court’, Briefing Paper 2, Essex Transitional Justice Network. www1.essex.ac.uk/tjn/documents/Paper_2_Collective_Reparations_Large.pdf (accessed 20 July 2021).Google Scholar

Aukerman, Miriam J., 2002, ‘Extraordinary Evil, Ordinary Crime: A Framework for Understanding Transitional Justice’, 15 Harvard Human Rights Journal, 39–97.Google Scholar

Aun, Pheap, and Brito, Maria, 2015, ‘At Unveiling of S-21 Stupa, Ambassador Calls in Youth’, Cambodia Daily, 27 March.Google Scholar

Autesserre, Séverine, 2010, The Trouble with the Congo: Local Violence and the Failure of International Peacebuilding, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Autesserre, Séverine, 2012, ‘Dangerous Tales: Dominant Narratives on the Congo and Their Unintended Consequences’, 111(443) African Affairs, 202–222.Google Scholar

Autesserre, Séverine, 2014, Peaceland: Conflict Resolution and the Everyday Politics of International Intervention, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bair, James, 2009, ‘From the Numbers Who Died to Those Who Survived: Victim Participation at the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia’, 31(2) University of Hawai’i Law Review, 507–552.Google Scholar

Balint, Jennifer, 1997, ‘Appendix A: Conflict, Conflict Victimization and Legal Redress, 1945–1996’, 59(4) Law and Contemporary Problems, 231–247.Google Scholar

Balint, Jennifer, 2012, Genocide, State Crime and the Law: In the Name of the State, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Balta, Alina, Bax, Manon, and Letschert, Rianne, 2019, ‘Between Idealism and Realism: A Comparative Analysis of the Reparations Regimes of the International Criminal Court and the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia’, 45(1) International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 15–38.Google Scholar

Balta, Alina, Bax, Manon, and Letschert, Rianne, 2019, ‘Trial and (Potential) Error: Conflicting Visions on Reparations within the ICC System’, 29(3) International Criminal Justice Review, 221–248.Google Scholar

Balta, Alina, 2020, ‘What’s Law Got to Do with It? Assessing International Courts’ Contribution to Reparative Justice for Victims of Mass Atrocities Through Their Reparations Regimes’, Doctoral thesis, Tilburg University.Google Scholar

Balthazard, Mychelle, 2012, ‘Cambodians’ Knowledge and Attitudes Towards the Cambodian Post-Conflict Justice Process’, PhD thesis, Tulane University.Google Scholar

Balthazard, Mychelle, 2013, ‘Khmer Rouge Tribunal Justice Project: Evaluation Report, 2010–2012’, ADHOC (on file with the author).Google Scholar

Balthazard, Mychelle, et al., 2015, ‘Truth, Reconciliation and Healing in Cambodia: Baseline Survey Report’, TPO Cambodia.Google Scholar

Barkan, Elazar, 2000, The Guilt of Nations: Restitution and Negotiating Historical Injustices, Baltimore and London: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Baron von Marschall, Joachim, 2014, ‘Speech of the German Ambassador’, Held on the Occasion of the Signing of a Memorandum of Understanding Between the Ministry of Culture of the Royal Government of Cambodia and the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, Tuol Sleng Genocide Museum, 10 July. www.phnom-penh.diplo.de/ (accessed 20 February 2018).Google Scholar

Baron von Marschall, Joachim, 2015, ‘Speech by the German Ambassador’ on the Occasion of the Inauguration Ceremony of the Memorial Stupa for the Victims of the Khmer Rouge Regime, Tuol Sleng Genocide Memorial, 26 March. www.phnom-penh.diplo.de/ (accessed 20 February 2018).Google Scholar

Bass, Gary, 2000, Stay the Hand of Vengeance: The Politics of War Crimes Tribunals, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Bassiouni, Cherif, 1999, ‘Negotiating the Treaty of Rome on the Establishment of an International Criminal Court’, 32(3) Cornell International Law Journal, 443–469.Google Scholar

Bassiouni, Cherif (ed.), 2003, The Statute of the International Criminal Court and Related Instruments: Legislative History 1994–2000, Ardsley, NY: Transnational Publishers.Google Scholar

Bates, Alex, 2010, ‘Transitional Justice in Cambodia: Analytical Report’, The Atlas Project, Université Paris I.Google Scholar

Becker, Elizabeth, 1986, When the War Was Over: Cambodia and the Khmer Rouge Revolution, New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

Behrends, Andrea, Park, Sung-Joon, and Rottenburg, Richard (eds.), 2014, Travelling Models in African Conflict Management: Translating Technologies of Social Ordering, Leiden and Boston: Brill.Google Scholar

Benedetti, Fanny, Bonneau, Karine, and Washburn, John, 2014, Negotiating the International Criminal Court: New York to Rome, 1994–1998, Leiden and Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar

Bernath, Julie, 2015, ‘“Complex Political Victims” in the Aftermath of Mass Atrocity: Reflections on the Khmer Rouge Tribunal in Cambodia’, 10(1) International Journal of Transitional Justice, 46–66.Google Scholar

Bernath, Julie, 2017, ‘Civil Party Participation and Resistance at the Khmer Rouge Tribunal’, in: Jones, Briony, and Bernath, Julie (eds.), Resistance and Transitional Justice, Milton Park: Routledge, 103–122.Google Scholar

Bertelman, Hanna, 2010, ‘International Standards and National Ownership? Judicial Independence in Hybrid Courts: The Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia’, 79(3) Nordic Journal of International Law, 341–382.Google Scholar

Birkett, Daley, 2020, ‘Coexistent but Uncoordinated: Asset Freezing Measures at the International Criminal Court and the UN Security Council’, 20(6) International Criminal Law Review, 983–1025.Google Scholar

Bitti, Gilbert, and Gonzalez Rivas, Gabriela, 2006, ‘The Reparations Provisions for Victims Under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court’, in: Permanent Court of Arbitration (ed.), 2006, Redressing Injustices Through Mass Claims Processes: Innovative Responses to Unique Challenges, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 299.Google Scholar

Bitti, Gilbert, and El Zeidy, Mohamend, 2010, ‘The Katanga Trial Chamber Decision: Selected Issues’, 23(2) Leiden Journal of International Law, 319–329.Google Scholar

Block-Lieb, Susan, and Halliday, Terence, 2017, Global Legislators: How International Organizations Make Commercial Law for the World, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bopha, Phorn, and Lewis, Simon, 2013, ‘Victims Call for Ieng Sary’s Assets to Be Seized’, Cambodia Daily, 20 March 2013.Google Scholar

Bottigliero, Ilaria, 2004, Redress for Victims of Crimes Under International Law, Leiden and Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre, 1977, Outline of a Theory of Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bourdieu, Pierre, 1986, ‘The Force of Law: Toward a Sociology of the Juridicial Field’, 38(5) Hastings Law Journal, 805–853.Google Scholar

Boyle, David, 2006, ‘The Rights of Victims: Participation, Representation, Protection, Reparations’, 4(2) Journal of International Criminal Justice, 307–313.Google Scholar

Braithwaite, John, 2002, Restorative Justice and Responsive Regulation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Brodney, Marissa, 2016, ‘Implementing International Criminal Court-Ordered Collective Reparations: Unpacking Present Debates’, 1 Journal of the Oxford Centre for Socio-Legal Studies, 1–35.Google Scholar

Brooks, Roy L. (ed.), 1999, When Sorry Isn’t Enough: The Controversy over Apologies and Reparations for Human Injustice, New York and London: New York University Press.Google Scholar

Bueger, Christian, and Gadinger, Frank, 2014, International Practice Theory, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Buerger, Catherine and Wilson, Richard Ashby, 2019, ‘The Practice of Human Rights’, in: MacClancy, Jeremy (ed.), Exotic No More: Anthropology on the Front Lines, 2nd edition, Chicago: University of Chicago, 291–305.Google Scholar

Burgis-Kasthala, Michelle, 2017, ‘How Should We Study International Criminal Law? Reflections on the Potentials and Pitfalls of Interdisciplinary Scholarship’, 17(2) International Criminal Law Review, 227–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burgis-Kasthala, Michelle, 2017, ‘Holding Individuals to Account Beyond the State? Rights, Regulation and the Resort to International Criminal Responsibility’, in: Drahos, Peter (ed.), Regulatory Theory: Foundations and Applications, Canberra: ANU Press, 429–444.Google Scholar

Cambodian Human Rights Action Committee (CHRAC), 2006, ‘Comments on the ECCC Draft Internal Rules’, 17 November 2006.Google Scholar

Cambodian Human Rights Action Committee (CHRAC), 2008, ‘CHRAC Workshop on Complaints Procedures: Workshop Report’, Workshop held on 22 February 2008, Phnom Penh.Google Scholar

Cambodian Human Rights Action Committee, 2009, ‘Open Letter to the Members of the ECCC Plenary and the Rules Committee’, 3 June 2009, Phnom Penh (on file with the author).Google Scholar

Cambodian Human Rights Action Committee and ECCC Victims Unit, 2009, ‘Reparations for Victims of the Khmer Rouge Regime’, Report of a conference held in Phnom Penh from 26–27 November 2008.Google Scholar

Cambodian Human Rights Action Committee and REDRESS, 2009, ‘Considering Reparations for Victims of the Khmer Rouge Regime’, Phnom Penh. www.refworld.org/pdfid/4b388dcd2.pdf (accessed 20 June 2021).Google Scholar

Cambodian Human Rights Action Committee, 2010, ‘New Directions for Victim Participation at the ECCC’, Press Release, 26 February 2010.Google Scholar

Cambodian Human Rights and Development Association (ADHOC), 2007, ‘Comment on the Right of the Civil Party in the Proceedings of the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia’, 2nd edition, Phnom Penh (on file with the author).Google Scholar

Cambodian Human Rights and Development Association (ADHOC), 2008, ‘ADHOC’s Position on Reparations for Victims of the Khmer Rouge’, Press Release, 8 December 2008, Phnom Penh (on file).Google Scholar

Candeias, Sofia, et al., 2015, ‘The Accountability Landscape in Eastern DRC: Analysis of the National Legislative and Judicial Response to International Crimes (2009–2014)’, International Center for Transitional Justice. www.ictj.org/publication/briefing-accountability-landscape-eastern-drc-analysis-national-legislative-and-judicial-response (accessed 16 July 2021).Google Scholar

Carayon, Gaelle, and O’Donohue, Jonathan, 2017, ‘The International Criminal Court’s Strategies in Relation to Victims’, 15(3) Journal of International Criminal Justice, 567–591.Google Scholar

Carmichael, Robert, 2015, ‘Cambodia’s Genocide Memorial A Controversial Reminder of a Brutal Past’, UCA News, 27 March 2015.Google Scholar

Cassese, Antonio, Gaeta, Paola, and Jones, John (eds.), 2002, The Rome Statute for an International Criminal Court: A Commentary, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Catani, Lucia, 2012, ‘Victims at the International Criminal Court: Some Lessons Learned from the Lubanga Case’, 10(4) Journal of International Criminal Justice, 905–922.Google Scholar

Celermajer, Danielle, 2009, The Sins of the Nation and the Ritual of Apologies, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cerne, Annette, and Jansson, Johan, 2019, ‘Projectification of Sustainable Development: Implications from a Critical Review’, 12(2) International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 356–376.Google Scholar

Chandler, David, 1991, The Tragedy of Cambodian History: Politics, War, and Revolution since 1945, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Chappell, Louise, 2013, ‘Conflicting Institutions and the Search for Gender Justice at the International Criminal Court’, 67(1) Political Research Quarterly, 183–196.Google Scholar

Chappell, Louise, 2014, ‘“New”, “Old”, and “Nested” Institutions and Gender Justice Outcomes: A View from the International Criminal Court’, 10(4) Politics & Gender, 572–594.Google Scholar

Chappell, Louise, 2016, Gender Justice at the International Criminal Court: Legacies and Legitimacy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Chappell, Louise, 2017, ‘The Gender Injustice Cascade: “Transformative” Reparations for Victims of Sexual and Gender-Based Crimes in the Lubanga Case at the International Criminal Court’, 21(9) International Journal of Human Rights, 1223–1242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Charlesworth, Hilary, 2017, ‘A Regulatory Perspective on the International Human Rights System’, in: Drahos, Peter (ed.), Regulatory Theory: Foundations and Applications, Canberra: ANU Press, 357–373.Google Scholar

Chifflet, Pascale, 2003, ‘The Role and Status of the Victim’, in: Boas, Gideon, and Schabas, William (eds.), Developments in the Case Law of the ICTY, Leiden and Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 75–111.Google Scholar

Christensen, Mikkel Jarle, 2015, ‘From Symbolic Surge to Closing Courts: The Transformation of International Criminal Justice and Its Professional Practices’, 43(4) International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 609–625.Google Scholar

Chung, Christine, 2008, ‘Victims’ Participation at the International Criminal Court: Are Concessions of the Court Clouding the Promise?’, 6(3) Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights, 459–545.Google Scholar

Cicmil, Svetlana, and O’Laocha, Eamonn, 2016, ‘The Logic of Projects and the Ideal of Community Development: Social Good, Participation and the Ethics of Knowing’, 9(3) International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 546–561.Google Scholar

Ciorciari, John, 2010, ‘The Duch Verdict’, Cambodia Tribunal Monitor, 28 July 2010. www.cambodiatribunal.org/sites/default/files/resources/the_duch_verdict.pdf (15 July 2021).Google Scholar

Ciorciari, John, and Heindel, Anne, 2014, Hybrid Justice: The Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Clamp, Kerry (ed.), 2016, Restorative Justice in Transitional Settings, Florence: Routledge.Google Scholar

Clancy, Deirdre, 2015, ‘“They Told Us We Would Be Part of History”: Reflections on the Civil Society Intermediary Experience in the Great Lakes Region’, in: De Vos, Christian, Kendall, Sara, and Stahn, Carsten (eds.), Contested Justice: The Politics and Practice of International Criminal Court Interventions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 219–248.Google Scholar

Clark, Janine, 2009, ‘International War Crimes Tribunals and the Challenge of Outreach’, 9(1) International Criminal Law Review, 99–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, Phil, 2008, ‘Law, Politics and Pragmatism: ICC Case Selection in the Democratic Republic of Congo and Uganda’, in: Clark, Phil, and Waddell, Nicholas (eds.), Courting Conflict? Peace, Justice and the ICC in Africa, London: Royal African Society, 37–45.Google Scholar

Clarke, Kamari Maxine, 2009, Fictions of Justice: The International Criminal Court and the Challenge of Legal Pluralism in Sub-Saharan Africa, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Coalition Nationale pour la Cour Pénale Internationale (CN-CPI) RDC, 2006, ‘Sondage d’Opinion: Affaire Procureur de la Cour Pénale Internationale contre Thomas Lubanga’, NGO report, Kinshasa.Google Scholar

Cohen, David, Hyde, Melanie and Van Tuyl, Penelope, 2015, ‘A Well-Reasoned Opinion? Critical Analysis of the First Case Against the Alleged Senior Leaders of the Khmer Rouge’, Asian International Justice Initiative, East-West Center. https://krtmonitor.org/2015/11/06/a-well-reasoned-opinion-case-002-01/ (accessed 17 July 2021).Google Scholar

Cohen, Miriam, 2020, Realizing Reparative Justice for International Crimes: From Theory to Practice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Collectif pour les Victimes des Khmers Rouges, 2006, ‘Proposition Relatives aux Droits des Victimes des Khmer Rouges devant les Chambres Extraordinaires Cambodgiennes’, Paris (on file with the author).Google Scholar

Collier, Paul, et al., 2003, Breaking the Conflict Trap: Civil War and Development Policy, World Bank Policy Research Report, Washington, DC, and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Combs, Nancy, 2007, Guilty Pleas in International Criminal Law: Constructing a Restorative Justice Approach, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Crawford, James, 1997, ‘An International Criminal Court?’, 12 Connecticut Journal of International Law, 255–263.Google Scholar

Crothers, Lauren, 2014, ‘MoU Paves Way for KR Memorial Stupa’, Cambodia Daily, 11 July.Google Scholar

Cruvellier, Thierry, 2014, Master of Confessions: The Trial of a Khmer Rouge Torturer, New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar

Damaska, Mirjan, 2008, ‘What Is the Point of International Criminal Justice?’, 83(1) Chicago Kent Law Review, 329–365.Google Scholar

Danieli, Yael, 2009, ‘Massive Trauma and the Healing Role of Reparative Justice’, 22(5) Journal of Traumatic Stress, 351–357.Google Scholar

Darehshori, Sara, 2008, ‘Lessons for Outreach from the Ad Hoc Tribunals, the Special Court for Sierra Leone, and the International Criminal Court’, 14 New England Journal of International and Comparative Law, 299–307.Google Scholar

Darian-Smith, Eve, 2013, Laws and Societies in Global Contexts: Contemporary Approaches, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

De Brouwer, Anne-Marie, 2007, ‘Reparation for Victims of Sexual Violence: Possibilities at the International Criminal Court and at the Trust Fund for Victims and Their Families’, 20(1) Leiden Journal of International Law, 207–237.Google Scholar

De Feyter, Koen, Parmentier, Stephan, Bossuyt, Marc, and Lemmens, Paul (eds.), 2005, Out of the Ashes: Reparation for Victims of Gross and Systematic Human Rights Violations, Antwerp and Oxford: Intersentia.Google Scholar

De Greiff, Pablo (ed.), 2006, The Handbook of Reparations, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

De Waardt, Mijke, 2013, ‘Are Peruvian Victims Being Mocked? Politicization of Victimhood and Victims’ Motivations for Reparations’, 35(4) Human Rights Quarterly, 830–849.Google Scholar

De Vos, Christian, 2011, ‘“Someone Who Comes Between One Person and Another”: Lubanga, Local Cooperation and the Right to a Fair Trial’, 12(1) Melbourne Journal of International Law, 217–236.Google Scholar

De Vos, Christian, Kendall, Sara, and Stahn, Carsten (eds.), 2015, Contested Justice: The Politics and Practice of International Criminal Court Interventions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Deitelhoff, Nicole, 2009, ‘The Discursive Process of Legalization: Charting Islands of Persuasion in the ICC Case’, 63(1) International Organization, 33–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dezalay, Sara, 2017, ‘Weakness as Routine in the Operations of the International Criminal Court’, 17(2) International Criminal Law Review, 281–301.Google Scholar

Diamond, Andrew, 2011, ‘Victims Once Again? Civil Party Participation Before the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia’, 38 Rutgers Law Record, 34–48Google Scholar

Dixon, Peter J., and Tenove, Chris, 2013, ‘International Criminal Justice as a Transnational Field: Rules, Authority and Victims’, 7(3) International Journal of Transitional Justice, 393–412.Google Scholar

Dixon, Peter J., 2015, ‘Reparations and the Politics of Recognition’, in: De Vos, Christian, Kendall, Sara, and Stahn, Carsten (eds.), Contested Justice: The Politics and Practice of International Criminal Court Interventions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 326–351.Google Scholar

Dixon, Peter J., 2016, ‘Reparations, Assistance and the Experience of Justice: Lessons from Colombia and the Democratic Republic of Congo’, 10(1) International Journal of Transitional Justice, 88–107.Google Scholar

Donat-Cattin, David, 1999, ‘Article 75 – Reparations’, in: Triffterer, Otto, Ambos, Kai, et al. (eds.), Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Observers’ Notes, Article by Article, Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1399–1412.Google Scholar

Drumbl, Mark, 2005, ‘Collective Violence and Individual Punishment: The Criminality of Mass Atrocity’, 99(2) Northwestern University Law Review, 539–610Google Scholar

Drumbl, Mark, 2007, Atrocity, Punishment and International Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Drumbl, Mark, 2009, ‘International Criminal Law: Taking Stock of a Busy Decade’, 10(1) Melbourne Journal of International Law, 38–45.Google Scholar

Drumbl, Mark, 2012, ‘The Effects of the Lubanga Case on Understanding and Preventing Child Soldiering’, 15 Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law, 87–116.Google Scholar

Du Plessis, Max, and Pete, Stephen (eds.), 2007, Repairing the Past? International Perspectives on Reparations for Gross Human Rights Abuses, Antwerp and Oxford: Intersentia.Google Scholar

Durbach, Andrea, and Chappell, Louise, 2014, ‘Leaving Behind the Age of Impunity: Victims of Gender Violence and the Promise of Reparations’, 16(4) International Feminist Journal of Politics, 543–562.Google Scholar

Dutton, Anne, and Aolain, Fionnuala Ni, 2019, ‘Between Reparations and Repair: Assessing the Work of the ICC Trust Fund for Victims Under Its Assistance Mandate’, 19(2) Chicago Journal of International Law, 490–547.Google Scholar

Dwertmann, Eva, 2009, Reparation System of the International Criminal Court: Its Implementation, Possibilities and Limitations, Leiden and Boston: Brill Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

Ear, Sophal, 2013, Aid Dependence in Cambodia: How Foreign Assistance Undermines Democracy, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Elander, Maria, 2012, ‘The Victim’s Address: Expressivism and the Victim at the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia’, 7(1) International Journal of Transitional Justice, 95–115.Google Scholar

Elander, Maria, 2018, Figuring Victims in International Criminal Justice: The Case of the Khmer Rouge Tribunal, Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Elias, Robert, 1986, The Politics of Victimization: Victims, Victimology, and Human Rights, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Emde, Sina, 2013, ‘National Memorial Sites and Personal Remembrance: Remembering the Dead of Tuol Sleng and Choeung Ek at the ECCC in Cambodia’, in: Pholsena, Vatthana, and Tappe, Oliver (eds.), Interactions with a Violent Past: Reading Post-Conflict Landscapes in Cambodia, Laos, and Vietnam, Singapore: NUS Press, 19–45.Google Scholar

Engle, Karen, 2015, ‘Anti-Impunity and the Turn to Criminal Law in Human Rights’, 100(5) Cornell Law Review, 1069–1127.Google Scholar

Engle, Karen, Miller, Zinaida, and Davis, Dennis M., 2016, Anti-Impunity and the Human Rights Agenda, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Esala, Jennifer, and Taing, Sopheap, 2017, ‘Testimony Therapy with Ritual: A Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial’, 30(1) Journal of Traumatic Stress, 94–98.Google Scholar

Etcheson, Craig, 2005, After the Killing Fields: Lessons from the Cambodian Genocide, Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar

Etcheson, Craig, 2019, Extraordinary Justice: Law, Politics and the Khmer Rouge Tribunals, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Evans, Christine, 2012, The Right to Reparations in International Law for Victims of Armed Conflict, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Fassin, Didier, 2012, Humanitarian Reason: A Moral History of the Present, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Fawthrop, Tom, and Jarvis, Helen, 2005, Getting Away with Genocide? Elusive Justice and the Khmer Rouge Tribunal, Sydney: University New South Wales Press.Google Scholar

Fawthrop, Tom, 2013, ‘Khmer Rouge Leader Ieng Sary Had US$20m in Hong Kong Account’, South China Morning Post, 31 March 2013.Google Scholar

FIDH, 2005, ‘Cambodge: Articulation entre la Cour Pénale Internationale et le Tribunal pour Juger les Khmer Rouges: La Place des Victimes’, International Federation for Human Rights, Report No 420. www.fidh.org/IMG/pdf/kh420f.pdf (accessed 18 July 2021).Google Scholar

FIDH and CHRAC, 2006, ‘Civil Society Urges the Cambodian Government to Fully Implement the Statute of the International Criminal Court’, Joint Press Release, 12 May.Google Scholar

Ferstman, Carla, 2002, ‘The Reparations Regime of the International Criminal Court: Practical Considerations’, 15(3) Leiden Journal of International Law, 667–686.Google Scholar

Ferstman, Carla, 2017, ‘Reparations, Assistance and Support’, in: Tibori-Szabo, Kinga, and Hirst, Megan (eds.), Victim Participation in International Criminal Justice: Practitioners’ Guide, The Hague, the Netherlands: T.M.C. Asser Press, 385–411.Google Scholar

Ferstman, Carla, 2020, ‘Reparations at the ICC: The Need for a Human Rights Based Approach to Effectiveness’, in: Ferstman, Carla, and Goetz, Mariana (eds.), Reparations for Victims of Genocide, War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity: Systems in Place and Systems in the Making, 2nd revised edition, Leiden and Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 446–478.Google Scholar

Ferstman, Carla, and Goetz, Mariana (eds.), 2020, Reparations for Victims of Genocide, War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity: Systems in Place and Systems in the Making, 2nd revised edition, Leiden and Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar

Findlay, Mark, 2009, ‘Activating a Victim Constituency in International Criminal Justice’, 3(2) International Journal of Transitional Justice, 183–206.Google Scholar

Findlay, Mark, and Henham, Ralph, 2009, Beyond Punishment: Achieving International Criminal Justice, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Fischer, Kirsten, 2020, ‘Messages from the Expressive Nature of ICC Reparations: Complex-Victims in Complex Contexts and the Trust Fund for Victims’, 20(2) International Criminal Law Review, 318–345.Google Scholar

Fletcher, Laurel E., and Weinstein, Harvey M., 2002, ‘Violence and Social Repair: Rethinking the Contribution of Justice to Reconciliation’, 24(3) Human Rights Quarterly, 573–639.Google Scholar

Fletcher, Laurel, 2015, ‘Refracted Justice: The Imagined Victim and the International Criminal Court’, in: De Vos, Christian, Kendall, Sara, and Stahn, Carsten (eds.), Contested Justice: The Politics and Practice of International Criminal Court Interventions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 302–325.Google Scholar

Freedman, Jim, 2017, A Conviction in Question: The First Trial at the International Criminal Court, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar

Friman, Hakan, 2009, ‘The International Criminal Court and the Participation of Victims: A Third Party to the Proceedings?’, 22(3) Leiden Journal of International Law, 485–500.Google Scholar

Funk, Markus, 2010, Victims’ Rights and Advocacy at the International Criminal Court, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gallie, W. B., 1956, ‘Essentially Contested Concepts’, 56 Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, New Series, 167–198.Google Scholar

Galvis Martinez, Manuel, 2014, ‘Forfeiture of Assets at the International Criminal Court: The Short Arm of International Criminal Justice’, 12(2) Journal of International Criminal Justice, 193–217.Google Scholar

Garbett, Claire, 2016, ‘From Passive Objects to Active Agents: A Comparative Study of Conceptions of Victim Identities at the ICTY and ICC’, 15(1) Journal of Human Rights, 40–59.Google Scholar

Garbett, Claire, 2017, ‘The International Criminal Court and Restorative Justice: Victims, Participation and the Process of Justice’, 5(2) Restorative Justice, 198–220.Google Scholar

Giddens, Anthony, 1979, Central Problems of a Social Theory: Action, Structure, and Contradiction in Social Analysis, London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Gidley, Rebecca, 2019, Illiberal Transitional Justice and the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Gillison, Douglas, 2009, ‘Lawyers Renew Call for KR Victim Trust Fund’, Cambodia Daily, 4 June, 27.Google Scholar

Glasius, Marlies, 2006, The International Criminal Court: A Global Civil Society Achievement, Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar

Goetz, Marianna, 2014, ‘Reparative Justice at the International Criminal Court: Best Practice or Tokensim?’, in: Wemmers, Jo-Anne (ed.), Reparation for Victims of Crimes Against Humanity: The Healing Role of Reparations, London and New York: Routledge, 53–70.Google Scholar

Goetz, Mariana, 2020, ‘Victims’ Experiences of the International Criminal Court’s Reparations Mandate in the Democratic Republic of Congo’, in: Ferstman, Carla, and Goetz, Mariana (eds.), Reparations for Victims of Genocide, War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity: Systems in Place and Systems in the Making, 2nd revised edition, Leiden and Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 415–445.Google Scholar

Goodale, Mark, 2007, ‘Locating Rights, Envisioning Law Between the Global and the Local’, in: Goodale, Mark, and Merry, Sally Engle, The Practice of Human Rights: Tracking Law Between the Global and the Local, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–38.Google Scholar

Goodale, Mark, and Merry, Sally Engle, 2007, The Practice of Human Rights: Tracking Law Between the Global and the Local, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gottesman, Evan, 2003, After the Khmer Rouge: Inside the Politics of Nation Building, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Gready, Paul, and Robins, Simon, 2014, ‘From Transitional to Transformative Justice: A New Agenda for Peace’, 8(3) International Journal of Transitional Justice, 339–361.Google Scholar

Grey, Rosemary, 2019, Prosecuting Sexual and Gender-Based Crimes at the International Criminal Court, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Grey, Rosemary, Sotheary, Yim, and Somaly, Kum, 2019, ‘The Khmer Rouge Tribunal’s First Reparation for Gender-Based Crimes’, 25(3) Australian Journal of Human Rights, 488–497.Google Scholar

Haasdijk, Suzan, 1992, ‘The Lack of Uniformity in the Terminology of the International Law of Remedies’, 5(2) Leiden Journal of International Law, 245–263.Google Scholar

Haddad, Heidi Nichols, 2013, ‘After the Norms Cascade: NGO Mission Expansion and the Coalition of the International Criminal Court’, 19(2) Global Governance, 187–206.Google Scholar

Hagan, John, and Levi, Ron, 2004, ‘Social Skill, the Milosevic Indictment, and the Rebirth of International Criminal Justice’, 1(4) European Journal of Criminology, 445–475.Google Scholar

Halliday, Terence, and Shaffer, Gregory (eds.), 2015, Transnational Legal Orders, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Phan, Hao Duy, 2009, ‘Reparations to Victims of Gross Human Rights Violations: The Case of Cambodia’, 4(1) East Asia Law Review, 277–298.Google Scholar

Haslam, Emily, and Edmunds, Rod, 2012, ‘Common Legal Representation at the International Criminal Court: More Symbolic than Real?’, 12(5) International Criminal Law Review, 871–903.Google Scholar

Haslam, Emily, and Edmunds, Rod, 2013, ‘Managing a New “Partnership”: Professionalization, Intermediaries and the International Criminal Court’, 24(1) Criminal Law Forum, 49–85.Google Scholar

Haslam, Nick, 2016, ‘Concept Creep: Psychology’s Expanding Concepts of Harm and Pathology’, 27(1) Psychological Inquiry, 1–17.Google Scholar

Hebel, Herman von, Lammers, Johan, and Schukking, Jolien (eds.), 1999, Reflections on the International Criminal Court: Essays in Honour of Adriaan Bos, The Hague, the Netherlands: T.M.C. Asser Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hébert-Dolbec, Marie-Laurence, 2015, ‘Towards Bureaucratization: An Analysis of Common Legal Representation Practices Before the International Criminal Court’, Revue Québécoise de Droit International, 35–61. www.persee.fr/doc/rqdi_0828-9999_2015_hos_3_1_2149Google Scholar

Hellman, Matias, 2015, ‘Challenges and Limitations of Outreach: From the ICTY to the ICC’, in: De Vos, Christian, Kendall, Sara, and Stahn, Carsten (eds.), 2015, Contested Justice: The Politics and Practice of International Criminal Court Interventions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 251–271.Google Scholar

Henne, Kathryn, 2017, ‘Multi-Sited Fieldwork in Regulatory Studies’, in: Drahos, Peter (ed.), Regulatory Theory: Foundations and Applications, Canberra: ANU Press, 97–114.Google Scholar

Herman, Johanna, 2013, ‘Realities of Victim Participation: The Civil Party System in Practice at the Extraordinary Chambers of the Courts of Cambodia’, 16(4) Contemporary Justice Review, 461–481.Google Scholar

Hinton, Alexander, 2004, Why Did They Kill? Cambodia in the Shadow of Genocide, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Hinton, Alexander, 2018, The Justice Façade: Trials of Transition in Cambodia, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Hobbs, Harry, 2014, ‘Victim Participation in International Criminal Proceedings: Problems and Potential Solutions in Implementing an Effective and Vital Component of Justice’, 49(1) Texas International Law Journal, 1–32.Google Scholar

Hoven, Elisa, Feiler, Mareike, and Scheibel, Saskia, 2013, ‘Victims in Trials of Mass Crimes: A Multi-Perspective Study of Civil Party Participation at the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia’, 3 Cologne Occasional Papers on International Peace and Security Law, September 2013.Google Scholar

Hughes, Caroline, 2003, The Political Economy of the Cambodian Transition, 1991–2001; London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hughes, Rachel, 2003, ‘Nationalism and Memory at the Tuol Sleng Museum of Genocide Crimes, Phnom Penh, Cambodia’, in: Hodgkin, Katharine, and Radstone, Susannah (eds.), Contested Pasts: The Politics of Memory, New York: Routledge, 175–192.Google Scholar

Hughes, Rachel, 2008, ‘Dutiful Tourism: Encountering the Cambodian Genocide’, 49(3) Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 318–330.Google Scholar

Hughes, Rachel, 2016, ‘Victims’ Rights, Victim Collectives, and Utopic Disruption at the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia’, 22(2) Australian Journal of Human Rights, 143–166.Google Scholar

Hughes, Rachel, 2019, ‘Showing Now: The Bophana Audiovisual Resource Centre and the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia’, in: Kent, Lia, Wallis, Joanne, and Cronin, Claire (eds.), Civil Society and Transitional Justice in Asia and the Pacific, Canberra: ANU Press, 107–126.Google Scholar

Hughes, Rachel, 2020, ‘Left Justified: The Early Campaign for an International Law Response to Khmer Rouge Crimes’, 76 Political Geography, 1–11.Google Scholar

Human Rights Center, 2015, ‘The Victims’ Court? A Study of 622 Victim Participants at the International Criminal Court’, Berkeley, CA: UC Berkeley, Human Rights Center. www.law.berkeley.edu/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/The-Victims-Court-November-2015.pdf (accessed 18 July 2021).Google Scholar

Human Rights Watch, 2003, ‘Ituri: “Covered in Blood”’. www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/reports/DRC0703.pdf (accessed 14 July 2021).Google Scholar

Human Rights Watch, et al., 2006, ‘DR Congo: ICC Charges Raise Concern’, Joint letter to the Chief Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, 31 July 2006. www.hrw.org/news/2006/07/31/dr-congo-icc-charges-raise-concern (accessed 15 July 2021).Google Scholar

Human Rights Watch, 2008, ‘Courting History: The Landmark International Criminal Court’s First Years’, New York. www.hrw.org/reports/2008/icc0708/8.htm#_Toc202933689 (accessed 6 July 2021).Google Scholar

Huy, Samphors, 2019, ‘Translating Global Norms: The Role of NGOs in Transitional Justice in Cambodia’, Cambodia Working Paper Series 4/2019, Swisspeace and Center for the Study of Humanitarian Law.Google Scholar

Ingadottir, Thordis, 2001, ‘The Trust Fund for Victims (Article 79 of the Rome Statute)’, ICC Discussion Paper No. 3, Project on International Courts and Tribunals (PICT).Google Scholar

International Center for Transitional Justice, 2009, ‘The Rabat Report: The Concept and Challenges of Collective Reparations’. www.ictj.org/publication/rabat-report-concept-and-challenges-collective-reparations (accessed 15 July 2021).Google Scholar

International Center for Transitional Justice, 2010, Outreach Strategies in International and Hybrid Courts, Report of the ICTJ-ECCC Workshop, Phnom Penh, 3–5 March 2010. www.ictj.org/sites/default/files/ICTJ-Outreach-ECCCWorkshop-Report-2010-English.pdf (accessed 19 July 2021).Google Scholar

International Rescue Committee, 2003, ‘Mortality in the Democratic Republic of Congo: Results from a Nationwide Survey’. https://reliefweb.int/report/democratic-republic-congo/mortality-democratic-republic-congo-results-nationwide-survey-apr (accessed 15 July 2021).Google Scholar

International Refugee Rights Initiative and APRODIVI-ASBL, 2012, ‘Steps Towards Justice, Frustrated Hopes: Some Reflections on the Experience of the International Criminal Court in Ituri’, Discussion paper no. 2. https://reliefweb.int/report/democratic-republic-congo/steps-towards-justice-frustrated-hopes-reflecting-impact-icc-ituri (accessed 18 July 2021).Google Scholar

Jarvis, Helen, 2014, ‘“Justice for the Deceased”: Victims’ Participation in the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia’, 8(2) Genocide Studies and Prevention, 19–27.Google Scholar

Jarvis, Helen, 2015, ‘Powerful Remains: The Continuing Presence of Victims of the Khmer Rouge Regime in Today’s Cambodia’, 1(2) Human Remains and Violence, 36–55.Google Scholar

Jasini, Rudina, 2016, ‘Victim Participation and Transitional Justice in Cambodia: The Case of the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia’, Impunity Watch. www.impunitywatch.org/victim-participation-and-transition (accessed 19 July 2021).Google Scholar

Jeffery, Renée, 2014, ‘Beyond Repair? Collective and Moral Reparations at the Khmer Rouge Tribunal’, 13(1) Journal of Human Rights, 103–119.Google Scholar

Jeffery, Renée, 2015, ‘The Forgiveness Dilemma: Emotions and Justice at the Khmer Rouge Tribunal’, 69(1) Australian Journal of International Affairs, 35–52.Google Scholar

Jenkins, Catherine, 2007, ‘Taking Apology Seriously’, in: Du Plessis, Max, and Pete, Stephen (eds.), Repairing the Past? International Perspectives on Reparations for Gross Human Rights Abuses, Oxford: Intersentia, 53–81.Google Scholar

Jensen, Anders, Thuesen, Christian, and Geraldi, Joana, 2016, ‘The Projectification of Everything: Projects as a Human Condition’, 47(3) Project Management Journal, 21–34.Google Scholar

Joas, Hans, 2013, The Sacredness of the Person: A New Genealogy of Human Rights, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

Johns, Fleur, 2013, Non-Legality in International Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Jorda, Claude, and Hemptinne, Jerome, 2002, ‘The Status and Role of the Victim’, in: Cassese, Antonio, Gaeta, Paola, and Jones, John (eds.), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, Oxford University Press, 1387–1419.Google Scholar

Joyce, Daniel, 2004, ‘The Historical Function of International Criminal Trials: Re-thinking International Criminal Law’, 73(4) Nordic Journal of International Law, 461–484.Google Scholar

Kambale, Pascal Kalume, 2015, ‘A Story of Missed Opportunities: The Role of the International Criminal Court in the Democratic Republic of Congo’, in: De Vos, Christian, Kendall, Sara, and Stahn, Carsten (eds.), 2015, Contested Justice: The Politics and Practice of International Criminal Court Interventions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 171–197.Google Scholar

Karp, David J., 2013, ‘The Location of International Practices: What Is Human Rights Practice?’, 39(4) Review of International Studies, 969–992.Google Scholar

Karstedt, Susanne, 2010, ‘From Absence to Presence, From Silence to Voice: Victims in International and Transitional Justice Since the Nuremberg Trials’, 17(1) International Review of Victimology, 9–30.Google Scholar

Karstedt, Susanne, 2012, ‘Contextualizing Mass Atrocity Crimes: The Dynamics of “Extremely Violent Societies”’, 9(5) European Journal of Criminology, 499–513.Google Scholar

Keller, Linda M., 2007, ‘Seeking Justice at the International Criminal Court: Victims’ Reparations’, 29(2) Thomas Jefferson Law Review, 189–217.Google Scholar

Kendall, Sara, and Nouwen, Sarah, 2013, ‘Representational Practices at the International Criminal Court: The Gap Between Juridified and Abstract Victimhood’, 76(3–4) Law & Contemporary Problems, 235–262.Google Scholar

Kendall, Sara, 2015, ‘Beyond the Restorative Turn’, in: De Vos, Christian, Kendall, Sara, and Stahn, Carsten (eds.), 2015, Contested Justice: The Politics and Practice of International Criminal Court Interventions, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 354–369.Google Scholar

Kent, Lia, 2012, The Dynamics of Transitional Justice: International Models and Local Realities in East Timor, Oxford: Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar

Khmer Institute of Democracy, 2004, ‘Survey on the Establishment of the Khmer Rouge Tribunal’, Phnom Penh (on file with the author).Google Scholar

Kiernan, Ben, 1996, The Pol Pot Regime: Race, Power, and Genocide in Cambodia Under the Khmer Rouge, 1975–1979, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Killean, Rachel, 2016, ‘Procedural Justice in International Criminal Courts: Assessing Civil Parties’ Perceptions of Justice at the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia’, 16(1) International Criminal Law Review, 1–38.Google Scholar

Killean, Rachel, 2018, ‘Constructing Victimhood at the Khmer Rouge Tribunal: Visibility, Selectivity and Participation’, 24(3) International Review of Victimology, 273–296.Google Scholar

Killean, Rachel, 2018, Victims, Atrocity and International Criminal Justice, Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Killean, Rachel, and Moffett, Luke, 2017, ‘Victim Legal Representation Before the ICC and the ECCC’, 15(4) Journal of International Criminal Justice, 713–740.Google Scholar

Killean, Rachel, and Moffett, Luke, 2020, ‘What’s in a Name? “Reparations” at the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia’, 21(1) Melbourne Journal of International Law, 1–29.Google Scholar

Kirchenbauer, Nadine, Balthazard, Mychelle, Ky, Latt, Vinck, Patrick, and Pham, Phuong, 2013, ‘Victim Participation Before the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia: Baseline Study of the Cambodian Human Rights and Development Association’s Civil Party Scheme for Case 002’, Phnom Penh: ADHOC. www.eccc.gov.kh/sites/default/files/Victims-participation-before-ECCC-Baseline-Study-Jan-2013.pdf (accessed 19 July 2021).Google Scholar

Kirsch, Philippe, and Oosterveld, Valerie, 2001, ‘The Preparatory Commission for the International Criminal Court’, 25(3) Fordham International Law Journal, 563–588.Google Scholar

Kodama, Yoshi, 2010, ‘For Judicial Justice and Reconciliation in Cambodia: Reflections upon the Establishment of the Khmer Rouge Trials and the Trials’ Procedural Rules 2007’, 9(2) Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals, 37–113.Google Scholar

Koskenniemi, Martti, 2004, ‘Hersch Lauterpacht and the Development of International Criminal Law’, 2(3) Journal of International Criminal Justice, 810–825.Google Scholar

Kovach, Imre, and Kucerova, Eva, 2009, ‘The Social Context of Project Proliferation: The Rise of a Project Class’, 11(3) Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 203–221.Google Scholar

Kroker, Patrick, 2010, ‘Transitional Justice Policy in Practice: Victim Participation in the Khmer Rouge Tribunal’, 53 German Yearbook of International Law, 753–791.Google Scholar

Ksem Ksan, 2010, ‘United in the Quest for Justice, Social Harmony, a Culture of Peace and Spiritual Healing’, Public Statement, 20 March 2010.Google Scholar

Ksem Ksan, 2010, ‘Letter to the Cambodian and International Judges of the ECCC Trial Chamber’, dated 7 April 2010, Phnom Penh (on file with the author).Google Scholar

Ksem Ksan, 2010, ‘Detailed Proposal for the Memorial Stupa “Ksem Ksan” on the Premise of Tuol Sleng Genocide Museum’, December 2010, Phnom Penh (on file with the author).Google Scholar

Ksem Ksan, 2011, ‘Opinion of Ksem Ksan Association on the Construction of a Memorial to the Victims of S-21 in the Tuol Sleng Museum Compound’, Public Statement, 11 April 2011.Google Scholar

Ksem Ksan, 2012, ‘Convicted Person Duch’s Apologies: A Trick to Avoid His Conviction by the ECCC’, Press Release, 24 February 2012, Phnom Penh (on file with the author).Google Scholar

Kuch Naren, 2014, ‘Survivor Against Inscribing Names of All S-21 Victims’, Cambodia Daily, 7 May 2014.Google Scholar

Kuch Naren, and Robertson, Holly, 2014, ‘Victims Call for Money from ECCC’, Cambodia Daily, 17 October 2014.Google Scholar

Kum Somaly, 2019, ‘How Do Donors Shape Transitional Justice in Cambodia?’, Cambodia Working Paper Series 8/2019, Swiss Peace and Center for the Study of Humanitarian Law.Google Scholar

Kurasawa, Fuyuki, 2007, The Work of Global Justice: Human Rights as Practices, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kurczy, Stephen, 2009, ‘For Former Khmer Rouge Prisoners, Reparations Are Key to Justice’, Christian Science Monitor, 3 July 2009.Google Scholar

Laplante, Lisa, 2014, ‘The Plural Justice Aims of Reparations’, in: Buckley-Zistel, Susanne, Beck, Teresa Koloma, Braun, Christian, and Mieth, Friederike (eds.), Transitional Justice Theories, Milton Park: Routledge, 66–84.Google Scholar

Lederach, John Paul, 1997, Building Peace: Sustainable Reconciliation in Divided Societies, Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.Google Scholar

Lee, Roy (ed.), 1999, International Criminal Court: The Making of the Rome Statute, The Hague, the Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar

Lee, Roy (ed.), 2001, The International Criminal Court: Elements of Crimes and Rules of Procedure and Evidence, Ardsley, NY: Transnational Publishers.Google Scholar

Lemonde, Marcel, 2013, Un Juge Face aux Khmers Rouges, Paris: Editions du Seuil.Google Scholar

Letschert, Rianne, Haveman, Roelof, de Brouwer, Anne-Marie, and Pemberton, Antony (eds.), 2011, Victimological Approaches to International Crimes: Africa, Antwerp: Intersentia.Google Scholar

Lewis, Peter, and Friman, Hakan, 2001, ‘Reparations to Victims’, in: Lee, Roy (ed.), The International Criminal Court: Elements of Crimes and Rules of Procedure and Evidence, Ardsley, NY: Transnational Publishers, 474–491.Google Scholar

Linton, Suzannah, 2004, Reconciliation in Cambodia, Phnom Penh: Documentation Center of Cambodia.Google Scholar

Lohne, Kjersti, 2017, ‘Global Civil Society, the ICC, and Legitimacy in International Criminal Justice’, in: Hayashi, Nobuo, and Bailliet, Cecilia (eds.), The Legitimacy of International Criminal Tribunals, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 449–472.Google Scholar

Lohne, Kjersti, 2019, Advocates of Humanity: Human Rights NGOs in International Criminal Justice, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Madsen, Mikael Rask, and Verschraegen, Gert (eds.), 2016, Making Human Rights Intelligible: Towards a Sociology of Human Rights, Oxford and Portland: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar

Mani, Rama, 2002, Beyond Retribution: Seeking Justice in the Shadows of War, Cambridge: Polity Press and Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar

Manirabona, Amissi, and Wemmers, Jo-Anne, 2013, ‘Specific Reparation for Specific Victimization: A Case for Suitable Reparation Strategies for War Crimes Victims in the DRC’, 13(5) International Criminal Law Review, 977–2012.Google Scholar

Manning, Peter, 2012, ‘Governing Memory: Justice, Reconciliation and Outreach at the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia’, 5(2) Memory Studies, 165–181.Google Scholar

Manning, Peter, 2017, Transitional Justice and Memory in Cambodia: Beyond the Extraordinary Chambers, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Marcus, George, 1995, ‘Ethnography in/of the World System: The Emergence of Multi-sited Ethnography’, 24(1) Annual Review of Anthropology, 95–117.Google Scholar

Massidda, Paolina, and Pellet, Sarah, 2009, ‘Role and Practice of the Office of Public Counsel for Victims’, in: Stahn, Carsten, and Sluiter, Goran (eds.), The Emerging Practice of the International Criminal Court, Leiden: Maritnus Nijhoff Publishers, 691–706.Google Scholar

Massoud, Mark, 2016, ‘Ideals and Practices in the Rule of Law: An Essay on Legal Politics’, 41(2) Law & Social Inquiry, 489–501.Google Scholar

McCaffrie, Caitlin, et al., 2018, ‘“So We Can Know What Happened”: The Educational Potential of the ECCC’, WSD Handa Center for Human Rights and International Justice, Stanford University. https://humanrights.stanford.edu/sites/g/files/sbiybj5951/f/publications/so_we_can_know_what_happened_2018.pdf (accessed 21 July 2021).Google Scholar

McCaffrie, Caitlin, and Mattes, Daniel, 2018, ‘Another Trial: A Review of Case 002/02’, Report for the WSD Handa Center for Human Rights and International Justice at Stanford University, revised version, 14 November 2018.Google Scholar

McCaffrie, Caitlin, 2020, ‘An Educational Legacy: Exploring the Links Between Education and Resilience at the ECCC’, 33(4) Leiden Journal of International Law, 975–991.Google Scholar

McCargo, Duncan, 2011, ‘Politics by Other Means? The Virtual Trials of the Khmer Rouge Tribunal’, 87(3) International Affairs, 613–627.Google Scholar

McCarthy, Conor, 2009, ‘Reparations Under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court and Reparative Justice Theory’, 3(2) International Journal of Transitional Justice, 250–271.Google Scholar

McCarthy, Conor, 2012, Reparations and Victim Support in the International Criminal Court, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

McCarthy, Conor, 2012, ‘Victim Redress and International Criminal Justice: Competing Paradigms, or Compatible Forms of Justice?’, 10(2) Journal of International Criminal Justice, 351–372.Google Scholar

McCleary-Sills, Jennifer, and Mukasa, Stella, 2013, ‘External Evaluation of the Trust Fund for Victims Programmes in Northern Uganda and the Democratic Republic of Congo: Towards a Perspective for Upcoming Interventions’, International Center for Research on Women. www.icrw.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/ICRW-TFV--Evaluation-Report.pdf (accessed 19 July 2021).Google Scholar

McEvoy, Kieran, and Newburn, Tim, 2003, Criminology, Conflict Resolution and Restorative Justice, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

McEvoy, Kieran, 2007, ‘Beyond Legalism: Towards a Thicker Understanding of Transitional Justice’, 34(4) Journal of Law and Society, 411–440.Google Scholar

McEvoy, Kieran, and McConnachie, Kirsten, 2013, ‘Victims and Transitional Justice: Voice, Agency and Blame’, 22(4) Social & Legal Studies, 489–513.Google Scholar

McGonigle, Brianne, 2009, ‘Two for the Price of One: Attempts by the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia to Combine Retributive and Restorative Justice Principles’, 22(1) Leiden Journal of International Law, 127–149.Google Scholar

McGonigle Leyh, Brianne, 2011, Procedural Justice? Victim Participation in International Criminal Proceedings, Antwerp and Oxford: Intersentia.Google Scholar

McGrew, Laura, 2000, ‘On the Record: Civil Society and the Tribunal in Cambodia’, The Advocacy Project, Issue 9. www.advocacynet.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/Cambodia-OTR-Issue-9.pdf (accessed 19 July 2021).Google Scholar

McKay, Fiona, 2000, ‘Are Reparations Appropriately Addressed in the ICC Statute?’, in: Shelton, Dinah (ed.), International Crimes, Peace, and Human Rights: The Role of the International Criminal Court, Ardsley, NY: Transnational Publishers, 163–174.Google Scholar

McPherson, Poppy, 2014, ‘Memorial Plan Prompts Debate About Victims and Perpetrators of Genocide’, Phnom Penh Post, 9 May.Google Scholar

Mégret, Frédéric, 2009, ‘The International Criminal Court Statute and the Failure to Mention Symbolic Reparation’, 16(2) International Review of Victimology, 127–147.Google Scholar

Mégret, Frédéric, 2016, ‘International Criminal Justice as a Juridical Field’, 13 Champ pénal/Penal field (online version). https://journals.openedition.org/champpenal/9284 (accessed 25 January 2022).Google Scholar

Meierhenrich, Jens, 2014, ‘The Practices of the International Criminal Court: Foreword’, 76(3–4) Law & Contemporary Problems, i–x.Google Scholar

Meierhenrich, Jens, 2014, ‘The Practice of International Law: A Theoretical Analysis’, 76(3–4) Law & Contemporary Problems, 1–83.Google Scholar

Meisenberg, Simon, and Stegmiller, Ignaz (eds), 2016, The Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia: Assessing Their Contribution to International Criminal Law, Den Haag: Springer and Asser Press.Google Scholar

Merry, Sally Engle, 2006, Human Rights and Gender Violence: Translating International Law into Local Justice, Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Mertus, Julie, 2000, ‘Truth in a Box: The Limits of Justice Through Judicial Mechanisms’, in: Amadiume, Ifi, and An-Na’im, Abdullahi (eds.), The Politics of Memory: Truth, Healing and Social Justice, London and New York: Zed Books, 142–161.Google Scholar

Mettraux, Guénaël, 2005, International Crimes and the Ad Hoc Tribunals, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Mey, Elyda, 2007, ‘Le Rôle de la Diaspora dans la Justice Transitionnelle: L’Exemple du Cambodge’, International Center for Transitional Justice. www.ictj.org/sites/default/files/ICTJ-Cambodia-Diaspora-Role-2007-French.pdf (accessed 18 July 2021).Google Scholar

Minow, Martha, 1998, Between Vengeance and Forgiveness: Facing History After Genocide and Mass Violence, Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar

Moffett, Luke, 2012, ‘The Role of Victims in the International Criminal Tribunals of the Second World War’, 12(2) International Criminal Law Review, 245–270.Google Scholar

Moffett, Luke, 2012, ‘Reparative Complementarity: Ensuring an Effective Remedy for Victims in the Reparations Regime of the International Criminal Court’, 17(3) Journal of Human Rights, 368–390.Google Scholar

Moffett, Luke, 2014, Justice for Victims Before the International Criminal Court, Milton Park and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Moffett, Luke, 2015, ‘Meaningful and Effective? Considering Victims’ Interests Through Participation at the International Criminal Court’, 26(2) Criminal Law Forum, 255–289.Google Scholar

Moffett, Luke, 2015, ‘Elaborating Justice for Victims at the International Criminal Court: Beyond Rhetoric and The Hague’, 13(2) Journal of International Criminal Justice, 281–311.Google Scholar

Moffett, Luke, 2017, ‘Reparations for Victims at the International Criminal Court: A New Way Forward?’, 21(9) International Journal of Human Rights, 1204–1222.Google Scholar

Moffett, Luke, and Sandoval, Clara, 2021, ‘Tilting at Windmills: Reparations and the International Criminal Court’, 34(3) Leiden Journal of International Law, 749–769.Google Scholar

Mohan, Mahdev, 2009, ‘The Paradox of Victim-Centrism: Victim Participation at the Khmer Rouge Tribunal’, 9(5) International Criminal Law Review, 733–775.Google Scholar

Kunthear, Mom, 2011, ‘KR Tribunal Mulls Tuol Sleng Reparation Plan with Culture Ministry’, Phnom Penh Post, 8 March 2011.Google Scholar

Morris, Virginia, and Scharf, Michael, 1995, An Insider’s Guide to the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia: A Documentary History and Analysis, New York: Transnational Publishers.Google Scholar

Moyn, Samuel, 2010, The Last Utopia: Human Rights in History, Cambridge, MA, and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Munck af Rosenschöld, Johan, and Wolf, Steven, 2017, ‘Toward Projectified Environmental Governance?, 49(2) Environment and Planning, 273–292.Google Scholar

Musila, Godfrey, 2009, Between Rhetoric and Action: The Politics, Processes and Practice of the ICC’s Work in the DRC, Monograph 164, Addis Ababa: Institute for Security Studies.Google Scholar

Muttukumaru, Christopher, 1999, ‘Reparations to Victims’, in: Lee, Roy S. (ed.), The International Criminal Court: The Making of the Rome Statute. Issues, Negotiations, Results, The Hague, the Netherlands, and Boston, MA: Kluwer Law International, 262–270.Google Scholar

Ndahinda, Felix, 2016, ‘Collective Victimization and Subjectivity in the Democratic Republic of Congo: Why Do Lasting Peace and Justice Remain Elusive?’, 23(2) International Journal on Minority Law and Group Rights, 137–178.Google Scholar

Neier, Aryeh, 2012, The International Human Rights Movement: A History, Princeton, NJ, and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Nguyen, Lyma, and Sperfeldt, Christoph, 2014, ‘Victim Participation and Minorities in Internationalised Criminal Trials: Ethnic Vietnamese Civil Parties at the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia’, 14 Macquarie Law Journal, 97–126.Google Scholar

Nickson, Ray, and Braithwaite, John, 2014, ‘Deeper, Broader, Longer Transitional Justice’, 11(4) European Journal of Criminology, 445–463.Google Scholar

Nicolini, Davide, 2013, Practice Theory, Work and Organisation: An Introduction, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Nou, Leakhena, 2015, ‘Elusive Retributive Justice in Post-Khmer Rouge Cambodia: Challenges of Using ECCC Victim Information Forms as a Victim Participatory Rights Mechanisms’, 25(2) Torture, 61–84.Google Scholar

OHCHR, 2010, ‘Report of the Mapping Exercise Documenting the Most Serious Violations of Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law Committed Within the Territory of the Democratic Republic of Congo Between Marc 1993 and June 2003’. www.ohchr.org/EN/Countries/AfricaRegion/Pages/RDCProjetMapping.aspx (accessed 15 July 2021).Google Scholar

Open Society Justice Initiative, 2004, ‘International Standards for the Treatment of Victims and Witnesses in Proceedings Before the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia for the Prosecution of Crimes Committed During the Period of Democratic Kampuchea’, Phnom Penh. www.justiceinitiative.org/publications/standards-treatment-victims-and-witnesses-cambodias-extraordinary-chambers (25 January 2022).Google Scholar

Open Society Justice Initiative, 2007, ‘Progress and Challenges at the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia’, June 2007.Google Scholar

Open Society Justice Initiative, 2013, ‘Reparations for Khmer Rouge Crimes’, Position Paper. www.opensocietyfoundations.org/sites/default/files/PositionPaper-ECCC-reparations-09-10-2013.pdf (accessed 20 July 2021).Google Scholar

O’Shea, Andreas, 2007, ‘Reparations Under International Criminal Law’, in: Du Plessis, Max, and Pete, Stephen (eds.), Repairing the Past? International Perspectives on Reparations for Gross Human Rights Abuses, Antwerp and Oxford: Intersentia, 179–196.Google Scholar

O’Toole, James, 2010, ‘Reparations Remain a Key Issue’, Phnom Penh Post, 27 July 2010.Google Scholar

Pace, William, 1999, ‘The Relationship Between the International Criminal Court and Non-Governmental Organisations’, in: Von Hebel, Herman, Lammers, Johan, and Schukking, Jolien (eds.), Reflections on the International Criminal Court: Essays in Honour of Adriaan Bos, The Hague, the Netherlands: T.M.C. Asser Press, 189–211.Google Scholar

Palmer, Emma, 2016, ‘Localizing International Criminal Accountability in Cambodia’, 16(1) International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 97–135.Google Scholar

Parmentier, Stephan, 2003, ‘Global Justice in the Aftermath of Mass Violence: The Role of the International Criminal Court’, 41(1–2) International Annals of Criminology, 203–224.Google Scholar

Pech, Sotheary, 2014, ‘KRT Civil Parties Say Reparations Benefit NGOs, Not Victims’, Phnom Penh Post, 17 October 2014.Google Scholar

Pena, Mariana, and Carayon, Gaelle, 2013, ‘Is the ICC Making the Most of Victim Participation?’, 7(3) International Journal of Transitional Justice, 518–535.Google Scholar

Pentelovitch, Norman, 2008, ‘Seeing Justice Done: The Importance of Prioritizing Outreach Efforts at International Criminal Tribunals’, 39(3) Georgetown Journal of International Law, 445–494.Google Scholar

Peskin, Victor, 2005, ‘Courting Rwanda: The Promise and Pitfalls of the ICTR Outreach Programme’, 3(4) Journal of International Criminal Justice, 950–961.Google Scholar

Petit, Franck, 2007, ‘Sensibilisation a la CPI en RDC: Sortir du “Profil Bas”’, International Center for Transitional Justice. www.ictj.org/sites/default/files/ICTJ-DRC-Sensibilisaton-CPI-2007-French.pdf (accessed 16 July 2021).Google Scholar

Pham, Phuong, Vinck, Patrick, Balthazard, Mychelle, Hean, Sokhom and Stover, Eric, 2009, ‘So We Will Never Forget: A Population-Based Survey on Attitudes About Social Reconstruction and the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia’, Human Rights Center. www.law.berkeley.edu/files/IHRLC/So_We_Will_Never_Forget.PDF (accessed 16 July 2021).Google Scholar

Pham, Phuong, Vinck, Patrick, Balthazard, Mychelle, Strasser, Judith, and Om, Charyia, 2011, ‘Victim Participation and the Trial of Duch at the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia’, 3(3) Journal of Human Rights Practice, 264–287.Google Scholar

Pham, Phuong, Vinck, Patrick, Balthazard, Mychelle, and Sokhom, Hean, 2011, ‘After the First Trial: A Population-Based Survey on Knowledge and Perception of Justice and the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia’, Human Rights Center, Berkeley, CA. www.law.berkeley.edu/files/HRC/Publications_After-the-First-Trial_06-2011.pdf (accessed 19 July 2021).Google Scholar

Poluda, Julian, Strasser, Judith, and Sotheara, Chhim, 2012, ‘Justice, Healing and Reconciliation in Cambodia’, in: Charbonneau, Bruno, and Parent, Genevieve (eds.), Peacebuilding, Memory and Reconciliation: Bridging Top-Down and Bottom-Up Approaches, London and New York: Routledge, 91–109.Google Scholar

Poluda, Julian, 2015, ‘Promoting Gender Equality and Improving Access to Justice for Female Survivors and Victims of Gender-Based Violence Under the Khmer Rouge Regime’, Final Evaluation Report, ECCC Victims Support Section. http://gbvkr.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/264-final-evaluation-report.pdf (accessed 20 July 2021).Google Scholar

Poluda, Julian, Siv, Sineth, and Yim, Sotheary, 2019, ‘Final Evaluation Report: Promoting Gender Equality and Improving Access to Justice for Female Survivors and Victims of Gender-Based Violence Under the Khmer Rouge’, September 2019. https://untf.unwomen.org/en/learning-hub/evaluations/2019/07/the-eccc-non-judicial-gender-project-phase-2 (accessed 15 July 2021).Google Scholar

Pottier, Johan, 2008, ‘Displacement and Ethnic Reintegration in Ituri, DR Congo: Challenges Ahead’, 46(3) Journal of Modern African Studies, 427–450.Google Scholar

Pouliot, Vincent, 2008, ‘The Logic of Practicality: A Theory of Practice of Security Communities’, 62(2) International Organization, 257–288.Google Scholar

Prunier, Gérard, 2009, Africa’s World War: Congo, the Rwandan Genocide, and the Making of a Continental Catastrophe, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Raab, Michaela, and Poluda, Julian, 2010, ‘Justice for the Survivors and for Future Generations: ADHOC’s ECCC/ICC Justice Project, December 2006–March 2010’, Evaluation report, Phnom Penh, March 2010 (on file with author).Google Scholar

Rajkovic, Nikolas, Aalberts, Tanja, and Gammeltoft-Hansen, Thomas (eds.), 2016, The Power of Legality: Practices of International Law and Their Politics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ramji, Jaya, 2005, ‘A Collective Response to Mass Violence: Reparations and Healing in Cambodia’, in:Ramji, Jaya, and Van Schaack, Beth (eds.), Bringing the Khmer Rouge to Justice: Prosecuting Mass Violence Before the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen, 359–376.Google Scholar

Randelzhofer, Albrecht, and Tomuschat, Christian (eds.), 1999, State Responsibility and the Individual: Reparation in Instances of Grave Violations of Human Rights, The Hague, the Netherlands, and Boston, MA: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar

Ratner, Steven R., Abrams, Jason S., and Bischoff, James L., 2009, Accountability for Human Rights Atrocities in International Law: Beyond the Nuremberg Legacy, 3rd edition, New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Rauxloh, Regina, 2021, ‘Good Intentions and Bad Consequences: The General Assistance Mandate of the Trust Fund for Victims of the ICC’, 34(1) Leiden Journal of International Law, 203–222.Google Scholar

REDRESS and Forensic Risk Alliance, 2003, ‘The International Criminal Court’s Trust Fund for Victims’, Discussion Document. https://redress.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/TFVReport.pdf (accessed 17 July 2021).Google Scholar

REDRESS, 2011, ‘Justice for Victims: The ICC’s Reparations Mandate’, London: REDRESS Trust. www.refworld.org/pdfid/4def341618.pdf (accessed 18 July 2021).Google Scholar

REDRESS, 2016, ‘Moving Reparation Forward at the ICC: Recommendations’. https://redress.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/1611REDRESS_ICCReparationPaper.pdf (accessed 30 July 2021).Google Scholar

Reus-Smit, Christian, 2011, ‘Struggles for Individual Rights and the Expansion of the International System’, 65(02) International Organization, 207–242.Google Scholar

Reyntjens, Filip, 2010, The Great African War: Congo and Regional Geopolitics, 1996–2006, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Robinson, Darryl, 2013, ‘A Cosmopolitan Account of International Criminal Law’, 26(1) Leiden Journal of International Law, 127–153.Google Scholar

Roht-Arriaza, Naomi, 2004, ‘Reparations in the Aftermath of Repression and Mass Violence’, in: Stover, Eric, and Weinstein, Harvey M. (eds.), My Neighbor, My Enemy: Justice and Community in the Aftermath of Mass Atrocities, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 121–139.Google Scholar

Romano, Cesare P., Nollkaemper, André, and Kleffner, Jann K. (eds.), 2004, Internationalized Criminal Courts and Tribunals: Sierra Leone, East Timor, Kosovo, and Cambodia, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Rombouts, Heidy, and Parmentier, Stephan, 2009, ‘The International Criminal Court and Its Trust Fund Are Coming of Age: Towards A Process Approach for the Reparation of Victims’, 16(2) International Review of Victimology, 149–182.Google Scholar

Rosenfeld, Friedrich, 2010, ‘Collective Reparations for Victims of Armed Conflict’ 92(879) International Review of the Red Cross, 731–746.Google Scholar

Roughol, Isabelle, 2008, ‘KR Survivors, Legal Experts Discuss Reparations for Victims’, Cambodia Daily, 27 November 2008, 32.Google Scholar

Rubio-Marin, Ruth (ed.), 2009, The Gender of Reparations: Unsettling Sexual Hierarchies While Redressing Human Rights Violations, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sarfaty, Galit, 2009, ‘Why Culture Matters in International Institutions: The Marginality of Human Rights at the World Bank’, 103(4) American Journal of International Law, 647–683.Google Scholar

Schatzki, Theodore, Cetina, Karin Knorr, and von Savigny, Eike (eds.), 2001, The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Schatzki, Theodore, 2016, ‘Keeping Track of Large Phenomena’, 104(1) Geographische Zeitschrift, 9–16.Google Scholar

Scheffer, David, 2006, ‘Genocide and Atrocity Crimes’, 1(3) Genocide Studies and Prevention, 229–250.Google Scholar

Scheffer, David, 2007, ‘The Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia’, Abridged book chapter. www.cambodiatribunal.org/sites/default/files/resources/Cambodia_Scheffer_Abridged_Chapter_July_2007.pdf (accessed 15 July 2021).Google Scholar

Schiff, Benjamin, 2008, Building the International Criminal Court, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Schwobel, Christina (ed.), 2014, Critical Approaches to International Criminal Law: An Introduction, Milton Park: Routledge.Google Scholar

Secretariat of the Royal Government Task Force, 2004, An Introduction to the Khmer Rouge Trials, Phnom Penh: Secretariat of the Royal Government Task Force, Office of the Council of Minister.Google Scholar

Sharp, Dustin, 2014, ‘Addressing Dilemmas of the Global and the Local in Transitional Justice’, 29(1) Emory International Law Review, 71–117.Google Scholar

Shaw, Rosalind, and Waldorf, Lars, with Hazan, Pierre (eds.), 2010, Localizing Transitional Justice: Interventions and Priorities After Mass Violence, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Shelton, Dinah, 2001, Remedies in International Human Rights Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Shelton, Dinah, 2012, ‘Introductory Note to the International Criminal Court: Situation in the Democratic Republic of Congo, Prosecutor v. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo, Decision Establishing the Principles and Procedures to Be Applied to Reparations’, 51(5) International Legal Materials, 971–1017.Google Scholar

Short, Philip, 2004, Pol Pot: The History of a Nightmare, London: John Murray.Google Scholar

Sikkink, Kathryn, 2011, The Justice Cascade: How Human Rights Prosecutions Are Changing World Politics, New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar

Simmoneau-Fort, Elisabeth, 2013, ‘Reparations a Major Issue’, Op-ed, Phnom Penh Post, 8 August 2013.Google Scholar

Sirath, Chum, 2009, ‘Latest Maneuver by Duch’s Lawyer Should Not Impress Anyone’, Cambodia Daily, 20 October 2009, 35.Google Scholar

Smeulers, Alette, Hola, Barbora, and van den Berg, Tom, 2013, ‘Sixty-Five Years of International Criminal Justice: The Facts and Figures’, 13(1) International Criminal Law Review, 7–41.Google Scholar

Soenthirith, Saing 2010, ‘Khmer Rouge Victims Group Calls for Preservation of Bones’, Cambodia Daily, 23 March 2010, 23.Google Scholar

Sonis, Jeffery, et al., 2009, ‘Probable Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Disability in Cambodia Associations With Perceived Justice, Desire for Revenge, and Attitudes Toward the Khmer Rouge Trials’, 302(5) JAMA, 527–536.Google Scholar

Spaargaren, Gert, Weenink, Don, and Lamers, Machiel (eds.), 2016, Practice Theory and Research: Exploring the Dynamics of Social Life, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Sperfeldt, Christoph, 2012, ‘Cambodian Civil Society and the Khmer Rouge Tribunal’, 6(1) International Journal of Transitional Justice, 149–160.Google Scholar

Sperfeldt, Christoph, 2012, ‘Collective Reparations at the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia’, 12(3) International Criminal Law Review, 457–489.Google Scholar

Sperfeldt, Christoph, 2013, ‘From the Margins of Internationalised Criminal Justice: Lessons Learned at the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia’, 11(5) Journal of International Criminal Justice, 1111–1137.Google Scholar

Sperfeldt, Christoph, 2013, ‘The Role of Cambodian Civil Society in the Victim Participation Scheme of the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia’, in: Bonacker, Thorsten, and Safferling, Christoph (eds.), Victims of International Crimes: An Interdisciplinary Discourse, The Hague, the Netherlands: T.M.C. Asser Press, 345–372.Google Scholar

Sperfeldt, Christoph, 2014, ‘Broadcasting Justice: Media Outreach at the Khmer Rouge Trials’, 115 Asia Pacific Issues, Honolulu: East-West Center.Google Scholar

Sperfeldt, Christoph, Hyde, Melanie, and Balthazard, Mychelle, 2016, ‘Voices for Reconciliation: Assessing Media Outreach and Survivor Engagement for Case 002 at the Khmer Rouge Trials’, Phnom Penh: East-West Center and Handa Center for Human Rights and International Justice. www.eastwestcenter.org/publications/voices-reconciliation-assessing-media-outreach-and-survivor-engagement-case-002-the (accessed 17 July 2021).Google Scholar

Sperfeldt, Christoph, 2017, ‘Rome’s Legacy: Negotiating the Reparations of the International Criminal Court’, 17(2) International Criminal Law Review, 351–377.Google Scholar

Sperfeldt, Christoph, 2017, ‘The Trial Against Hissène Habré: Networked Justice and Reparations at the Extraordinary African Chambers’, 21(9) International Journal of Human Rights, 1243–1260.Google Scholar

Sperfeldt, Christoph, and Jeudy, Oeung, 2019, ‘The Evolution of Cambodian Civil Society’s Involvement with Victim Participation at the Khmer Rouge Trials’, in: Kent, Lia, Wallis, Joanne, and Cronin, Claire (eds.), Civil Society and Transitional Justice in Asia and the Pacific, Canberra: ANU Press, 85–106.Google Scholar

Sperfeldt, Christoph, 2020, ‘Reparations at the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia’, in: Ferstman, Carla, and Mariana, Goetz (eds.), 2020, Reparations for Victims of Genocide, War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity: Systems in Place and Systems in the Making, 2nd revised edition, Leiden and Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 479–504.Google Scholar

Sperfeldt, Christoph, 2020, ‘Minorities and Statelessness: Social Exclusion and Citizenship in Cambodia’, 27(1) International Journal on Minority and Group Rights, 94–120.Google Scholar

Sperfeldt, Christoph, 2020, ‘Reparations and the Habré Trial in Context’, in: Weill, Sharon, Seelinger, Kim Thuy, and Carlson, Kerstin Bree (eds.), The President on Trial, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 340–350.Google Scholar

Sperfeldt, Christoph, and Hughes, Rachel, 2021, ‘The Projectification of Reparation’, 12(3) Journal of Human Rights Practice, 545–565.Google Scholar

Spiga, Valentina, 2012, ‘No Redress Without Justice: Victims and International Criminal Law’, 10(5) Journal of International Criminal Law, 1377–1394.Google Scholar

Stahn, Carsten, 2014, ‘Justice Delivered or Justice Denied? The Legacy of the Katanga Judgment’, 12(4) Journal of International Criminal Justice, 809–834.Google Scholar

Stahn, Carsten, 2015, ‘Reparative Justice After the Lubanga Appeal Judgment’, 13(4) Journal of International Criminal Justice, 801–813.Google Scholar

Stammel, Nadine, et al., 2010, ‘The Survivors’ Voices: Attitudes on the ECCC, the Former Khmer Rouge and Experiences with Civil Party Participation’, Berlin: Berlin Center for Torture Victims. http://tpocambodia.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/bzfo_Cambodia_Report_Khmer_2011.pdf (accessed 20 July 2021).Google Scholar

Stappert, Nora, 2017, ‘The Construction of Legal Authority and the Boundaries of Communities of Practice in International Criminal Law’, Paper presented at the 11th Pan-European Conference on International Relations, Barcelona, 13–16 September 2017 (on file with the author).Google Scholar

Stappert, Nora, 2018, ‘A New Influence of Legal Scholars? The Use of Academic Writings at International Criminal Courts and Tribunals’, 31(4) Leiden Journal of International Law, 963–980.Google Scholar

Stegmiller, Ignaz, 2014, ‘Legal Developments in Civil Party Participation at the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia’, 27(2) Leiden Journal of International Law, 465–477.Google Scholar

Stover, Eric, 2005, The Witnesses: War Crimes and the Promise of Justice in The Hague, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Stover, Eric, Balthazard, Mychelle, and Koenig, Alexa, 2011, ‘Confronting Duch: Civil Party Participation at the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia’, 93(882) International Review of the Red Cross, 1–44.Google Scholar

Strasser, Judith, Poluda, Julian, Balthazard, Mychelle, Chariya, Om, Sotheary, Yim, Sophea, Im, Kok-Thay, Eng, and Sperfeldt, Christoph, 2011, ‘Engaging Communities – Easing the Pain: Outreach and Psychosocial Interventions in the Context of the Khmer Rouge Tribunal’, in: Lauritsch, Katharina, and Kernjak, Franc (eds.), We Need the Truth. Enforced Disappearances in Asia, Guatemala City: ECAP, 146–159.Google Scholar

Strasser, Judith, Poluda, Julian, Sotheara, Chhim, and Pham, Phuong, 2011, ‘Justice and Healing at the Khmer Rouge Tribunal: The Psychological Impact of Civil Party Participation’, in: Van Schaak, Beth, Reicherter, Daryn, and Chhang, Youk (eds.), Cambodia’s Hidden Scars: Trauma Psychology in the Wake of the Khmer Rouge, Phnom Penh: Documentation Center of Cambodia, 149–171.Google Scholar

Strasser, Judith, Chhim, Sotheara, and Taing, Sopheap, 2015, ‘Narrative Exposure Therapy (NET): Culturally Sensitive Trauma Treatment for Khmer Rouge Survivors’, The International Association of Buddhist Universities (IABU), papers presented at the 2nd IABU Conference, Ayutthaya, 100–104. https://buddhispano.net/sites/default/files/2017-01/buddhist_psychotherapy.pdf#page=113Google Scholar

Strasser, Judith, Studzinsky, Silke, Kim, Thida, and Taing, Sopheap, 2015, ‘A Study About Victims’ Participation at the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia and Gender-Based Violence Under the Khmer Rouge Regime’, TPO Cambodia. https://tpocambodia.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/TPO_GBV-under-the-Khmer-Rouge_Report_20151.pdf (accessed 21 July 2021).Google Scholar

Struett, Michael, 2008, The Politics of Constructing the International Criminal Court: NGOs, Discourse, and Agency, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Studzinsky, Silke, 2011, ‘Victim’s Participation Before the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia’, 10 Zeitschrift fur Internationale Strafrechtsdogmatik, 887–891.Google Scholar

Studzinsky, Silke, 2013, ‘Participation Rights of Victims as Civil Parties and the Challenges of Their Implementation Before the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia’, in: Bonacker, Thorsten, and Safferling, Christoph (eds.), Victims of International Crimes: An Interdisciplinary Discourse, The Hague, the Netherlands: T.M.C. Asser Press, 175–188.Google Scholar

Tapia Navarro, Nadia, 2018, ‘Collective Reparations and the Limitations of International Criminal Justice to Respond to Mass Atrocity’, 18(1) International Criminal Law Review, 67–96.Google Scholar

Teitel, Ruti, 1997, ‘Human Rights Genealogy’, 66(2) Fordham Law Review, 301–317.Google Scholar

Teitel, Ruti, 2000, Transitional Justice, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Teitel, Ruti, 2011, Humanity’s Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Thomas, Sarah, and Terith, Chy, 2009, ‘Including Survivors in the Tribunal Process’, in: Ciorciari, John, and Heindel, Anne (eds.), The Khmer Rouge Accountability Process, Phnom Penh: Documentation Center of Cambodia, 214–293.Google Scholar

Tibori-Szabo, Kinga, and Hirst, Megan (eds.), 2017, Victim Participation in International Criminal Justice: Practitioners’ Guide, The Hague, the Netherlands: T.M.C. Asser Press.Google Scholar

Torpey, John (ed.), 2003, Politics and the Past: On Repairing Historical Injustices, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar

Torpey, John, 2007, ‘Modes of Repair: Reparations and Citizenship at the Dawn of the New Millennium’, 18 Political Power and Social Theory, 207–226.Google Scholar

Transcultural Psychosocial Organization (TPO), 2010, ‘Report on TPO’s After-Verdict Intervention with Case 001 Civil Parties’, Phnom Penh: TPO (unpublished document).Google Scholar

Triffterer, Otto (ed.), 1999, Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Observer’s Notes, Article by Article, Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar

Tsing, Anna Lowenhaupt, 2005, Friction: An Ethnography of Global Connection, Princeton, NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Ullrich, Leila, 2016, ‘Beyond the “Global-Local Divide”’, 14(3) Journal of International Criminal Justice, 543–568.Google Scholar

Urs, Tara, 2006, ‘Memorandum on Outreach Strategies for the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia’, Open Society Justice Initiative.Google Scholar

Van den Wyngaert, Christine, 2011, ‘Victims Before International Criminal Courts: Some Views and Concerns of an ICC Trial Judge’, 44(1) Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law, 465–496.Google Scholar

Van der Spuy, Elena, Parmentier, Stephan, and Dissel, Amanda (eds.), 2008, Restorative Justice: Politics, Policies and Prospects, Cape Town: Juta.Google Scholar

Van Schaak, Beth, Reicherter, Daryn, and Chhang, Youk (eds.), 2011, Cambodia’s Hidden Scars: Trauma Psychology in the Wake of the Khmer Rouge, Phnom Penh: Documentation Center of Cambodia.Google Scholar

Vandeginste, Stef, 2003, ‘Reparation’, in: Bloomfield, David, Barnes, Teresa, and Huyse, Luc (eds.), Reconciliation After Violent Conflict: A Handbook, Stockholm: IDEA, 145–161.Google Scholar

Vanfraechem, Inge, Pemberton, Antony, and Ndahinda, Felix, 2014, Justice for Victims: Perspectives on Rights, Transition and Reconciliation, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Victims’ Rights Working Group, 2005a, ‘Draft Regulations of the ICC Trust Fund for Victims: Comments on the Proposal Submitted by Australia, Canada, Croatia, Japan, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway and the United Kingdom’.Google Scholar

Victims’ Rights Working Group, 2005b, ‘Submission to the Second Meeting of the Bureau’s Working Group on Regulations of the Trust Fund for Victims, 3–4 August 2005’.Google Scholar

Victims’ Rights Working Group, 2009, ‘Comments on the Role and Relationship of “Intermediaries” with the International Criminal Court’.Google Scholar

Victims’ Rights Working Group, 2010, ‘The Impact of the Rome Statute System on Victims and Affected Communities’.Google Scholar

Victims’ Rights Working Group, 2011, ‘Establishing Effective Reparations Procedures and Principles for the International Criminal Court’.Google Scholar

Vinck, Patrick, and Pham, Phuong, 2014a, ‘Consulting Survivors: Evidence from Cambodia, Northern Uganda, and Other Countries Affected by Mass Violence’, in: Stern, Steve, and Straus, Scott (eds.), The Human Rights Paradox: Universality and Its Discontents, Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 107–124.Google Scholar

Vinck, Patrick, and Pham, Phuong, 2014b, ‘Searching for Lasting Peace: Population-Based Survey on Perception and Attitudes About Peace, Security and Justice in Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo’, Harvard Humanitarian Initiative and United National Development Programme. https://reliefweb.int/report/democratic-republic-congo/searching-lasting-peace-population-based-survey-perceptions-and (accessed 18 July 2021).Google Scholar

Vinck, Patrick, Pham, Phuong, Baldo, Suliman, and Shigekane, Rachel, 2008, ‘Living with Fear: A Population-Based Survey on Attitudes About Peace, Justice, and Social Reconstruction in Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo’, Berkeley, CA: Human Rights Center, UC Berkeley/Payson Center for International Development, and International Center for Transitional Justice. www.ictj.org/publication/living-fear-population-based-survey-attitudes-about-peace-justice-and-social (accessed 15 July 2021).Google Scholar

Vircoulon, Thierry, 2010, ‘The Ituri Paradox: When Armed Groups Have a Land Policy and Peacemakers Do Not’, in: Anseeuw, Ward, and Alden, Chris (eds.), The Struggle over Land in Africa: Conflicts, Politics and Change, Cape Town: HSRC Press, 209–220.Google Scholar

Vlassenroot, Koen, and Raeymaekers, Timothy (eds.), 2004, Conflict and Social Transformation in Eastern DR Congo, Ghent: Academia Press.Google Scholar

Vlassenroot, Koen, and Raeymaekers, Timothy, 2004, ‘The Politics of Rebellion and Intervention in Ituri: The Emergence of a New Political Complex?’, 103(412) African Affairs, 385–412.Google Scholar

Von Hirsch, Andrew, Roberts, Julian, and Bottoms, Anthony (eds.), 2003, Restorative Justice and Criminal Justice: Competing or Reconcilable Paradigms?, Oxford and Portland: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar

Wallace, Julia, 2010, ‘No Investigation of Assets of Detained KR Leader, Court Says’, Cambodia Daily, 6 August 2010.Google Scholar

Wallace, Julia, 2011, ‘Slate of “Nonjudicial Measures” Proposed to the Tribunal’, Cambodia Daily, 7 January 2011, 24.Google Scholar

Walleyn, Luc, 2016, ‘Victim Participation in the ICC Proceedings: Challenges Ahead’, 16(6) International Criminal Law Review, 995–1017.Google Scholar

Wemmers, Jo-Anne, 2010, ‘Victims’ Rights and the International Criminal Court: Perceptions Within the Court Regarding the Victims’ Right to Participate’, 23(3) Leiden Journal of International Law, 626–643.Google Scholar

Wemmers, Jo-Anne, 2014, ‘The Healing Role of Reparations’, in: Wemmers, Jo-Anne (ed.), Reparation for Victims of Crimes Against Humanity: The Healing Role of Reparations, London and New York: Routledge, 221–233.Google Scholar

Wemmers, Jo-Anne (ed.), 2014, Reparation for Victims of Crimes Against Humanity: The Healing Role of Reparations, London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Werner, Alain, and Rudy, Daniela, 2010, ‘Civil Party Representation at the ECCC: Sounding the Retreat in International Criminal Law?’, 8(3) Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights, 301–309.Google Scholar

White, Cheryl, 2017, Bridging Divides in Transitional Justice: The Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia, Mortsel: Intersentia.Google Scholar

White, Stuart, 2013, ‘Little Time for Reparations at KRT’, Phnom Penh Post, 7 August 2013.Google Scholar

White, Stuart, 2014, ‘Khmer Rouge Accused Pledge to Boycott Trial’, Phnom Penh Post, 18 October 2014.Google Scholar

Wiener, Antje, 2014, A Theory of Contestation, Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar

Williams, Sarah, 2015, ‘The Severance of Case 002 at the ECCC: A Radical Trial Management Technique or a Step Too Far?’, 13(4) Journal of International Criminal Justice, 815–843.Google Scholar

Williams, Sarah, and Palmer, Emma, 2016, ‘Transformative Reparations for Women and Girls at the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia’, 10(2) International Journal of Transitional Justice, 311–331.Google Scholar

Williams, Timothy, Bernath, Julie, Tann, Boravin, and Kum, Somaly, 2018, ‘Justice and Reconciliation for the Victims of the Khmer Rouge? Victim Participation in Cambodia’s Transitional Justice Process’, Marburg: Centre for Conflict Studies; and Phnom Penh: Centre for the Study of Humanitarian Law. https://www.uni-marburg.de/de/konfliktforschung/dateien/drittmittelprojekte-dateien/tw-victimhood-report-en-2018.pdfGoogle Scholar

Wilson, Richard, 2006, ‘Afterword to “Anthropology and Human Rights in a New Key”: The Social Life of Human Rights’, 108(1) American Anthropologist, 77–83.Google Scholar

Wilson, Richard, 2011, Writing History in International Criminal Trials, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Yogendran, Sangeetha, 2017, ‘Did the ICC Fail Child Victims in the Lubanga Reparations Order?’, 9(2) Amsterdam Law Forum, 65–83.Google Scholar

Zegveld, Liesbeth, 2010, ‘Victims’ Reparations Claims and International Criminal Courts’, 8(1) Journal of International Criminal Justice, 79–111.Google Scholar

Zegveld, Liesbeth, 2019, ‘Victims as a Third Party: Empowerment of Victims’, 19(2) International Criminal Law Review, 321–345.Google Scholar

Zsombor, Peter, 2014, ‘More Money Sought for KR Tribunal Reparations’, Cambodia Daily, 26 February 2014.Google Scholar

Agreement Between the United Nations and the Royal Government of Cambodia Concerning the Prosecution Under Cambodian Law of Crimes Committed During the Period of Democratic Kampuchea, 6 June 2003.Google Scholar

An Agenda for Peace: Preventive Diplomacy, Peacemaking and Peace-Keeping, UN Doc A/47/277, 17 June 1992.Google Scholar

Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparation for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law, UN Doc A/RES/60/147, 16 December 2005.Google Scholar

Commission on Human Rights, 1993, Study Concerning the Right to Restitution, Compensation and Rehabilitation for Victims of Gross Violations of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms: The Final Report Submitted by Mr. Theo van Boven, Special Rapporteur, UN Doc E/CN.4/Sub.2/1993/8, 2 July 1993.Google Scholar

Commission on Human Rights, 1997, Question of the Impunity of Perpetrators of Human Rights Violations, Revised final report prepared by Mr. Joinet pursuant to Sub-Commission decision 1996/119, UN Doc. E/CN.4/Sub.2/1997/20/Rev.1, 2 October 1997.Google Scholar

Committee Against Torture, 2010, Concluding Observation of the Committee Against Torture on Cambodia, GAOR, Forty-Fifth Session, UN Doc A/66/44, 1–19 November 2010.Google Scholar

Letter Dated 10 February 1993 from the Permanent Representative of France to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General, Forwarding a Report of the Committee of French Jurists to Study the Establishment of an International Criminal Tribunal to Judge the Crimes Committed in the Former Yugoslavia, UN Doc S/25266, 10 February 1993.Google Scholar

Letter Dated 18 February 1993 from the Permanent Representative of Sweden to the United Nations Addressed to the Secretary-General, Forwarding the Decision by the Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe on the Proposal for an International War Crimes Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, UN Doc S/25307, 18 February 1993.Google Scholar

Letter Dated 5 April 1993 from the Permanent Representative of the United States of America to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General, UN Doc S/25575, 12 April 1993, Annex II with draft charter.Google Scholar

Letter Dated 21 June 1997 from the First and Second Prime Ministers of Cambodia Addressed to the Secretary-General, UN Doc A/51/930-S/1997/488, 24 June 1997, Annex.Google Scholar

Letter Dated 12 October 2000 from the President of the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia Addressed to the Secretary-General, UN Doc S/2000/1063, 3 November 2000, Annex.Google Scholar

Letter Dated 9 November 2000 from the President of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda Addressed to the Secretary-General, UN Doc S/2000/1198, 15 December 2000, Annex.Google Scholar

Report of the Secretary-General Pursuant to Paragraph 2 of Security Council Resolution 808 (1993), UN Doc S/25704, 3 May 1993.Google Scholar

Report of the Group of Experts for Cambodia Established Pursuant to General Assembly Resolution 52/135, GA 53rd session, 18 February 1999.Google Scholar

Report of the Secretary-General on Children and Armed Conflict, UN Doc A/55/163-S/2000/712, 19 July 2000.Google Scholar

Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies, Report of the Secretary-General, UN Doc S/2004/616, 23 August 2004.Google Scholar

United Nations Declaration of Basic Principles of Justice for Victims of Crime and Abuse of Power, UN Doc A/RES/40/34, 29 November 1985.Google Scholar

Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, opened for signature, 17 July 1998.Google Scholar

International Criminal Court, 2002, Rules of Procedure and Evidence, ICC-ASP/1/3, 9 September 2002.Google Scholar

Regulations of the Trust Fund for Victims, ICC-ASP/4/Res.3, 3 December 2005, Annex.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Lubanga, 2008, ‘Judgment on the Appeals of the Prosecutor and the Defence Against Trial Chamber I’s Decision on Victims’ Participation of 18 January 2008’, Appeals Chamber, ICC-01/04-01/06-1432, 11 July 2008.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Lubanga, 2009, ‘Redacted Version of “Decision on ‘Indirect Victims’”, Trial Chamber I, ICC-01/04-01/06-1813, 8 April 2009.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Lubanga, 2011, ‘Second Report of the Registry on Reparations’, Registry, ICC-01/04-01/06-2806, 1 September 2011 (initially confidential, reclassified as public on 19 March 2012).Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Lubanga, 2011, ‘Trust Fund for Victims’ First Report on Reparations’, Trust Fund for Victims, ICC-01/04-01/06-2803-Red, 1 September 2011.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Lubanga, 2012, ‘Judgment Pursuant to Article 74 of the Statute’, Trial Chamber I, ICC-01/04-01/06-2842, 14 March 2012.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Lubanga, 2012, ‘Observations on the Sentence and Reparations by Victims’, V01 Victim Group, ICC-01/04-01/06-2864-tENG, 18 April 2012.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Lubanga, 2012, ‘Observations of the V02 Group of Victims on Sentencing and Reparations’, V02 Victim Group, ICC-01/04-01/06-2869-tENG, 18 April 2012.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Lubanga, 2012, ‘Decision Granting Leave to Make Representations in the Reparations Proceedings’, Trial Chamber I, ICC-01/04-01/06-2870, 20 April 2012.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Lubanga, 2012, ‘Observations on Reparations in Response to the Scheduling Order of 14 March 2012’, Trust Fund for Victims, ICC-01/04-01/06-2872, 25 April 2012.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Lubanga, 2012, ‘Decision Establishing the Principles and Procedures to Be Applied to Reparations’, Trial Chamber I, ICC-01/04-01/06-2904, 7 August 2012.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Lubanga, 2012, ‘Appeal Against Trial Chamber I’s Decision Establishing the Principles and Procedures to Be Applied to Reparations of 7 August 2012’, OPCV and V02 Team of Legal Representatives, ICC-01/04-01/06-2909-tENG, 24 August 2012.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Lubanga, 2012, ‘Appeal Against Trial Chamber I’s Decision Establishing the Principles and Procedures to Be Applied to Reparation of 7 August 2012’, V01 Team of Legal Representatives, ICC-01/04-01/06-2914-tENG, 3 September 2012.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Lubanga, 2012, ‘Decision on the Admissibility of Appeals Against Trial Chamber I’s “Decision Establishing the Principles and Procedures to Be Applied to Reparations” and Directions on the Further Conduct of Proceedings’, Appeals Chamber, ICC-01/04-01/06-2953, 14 December 2012.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Lubanga, 2014, ‘Judgment on the Appeal of Mr Thomas Lubanga Dyilo Against His Conviction’, Appeals Chamber, ICC-01/04-01/06-3121-Red, 1 December 2014.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Lubanga, 2015, ‘Judgment on the Appeals Against the “Decision Establishing the Principles and Procedures to Be Applied to Reparations” of 7 August 2012 with Amended Order for Reparations (Annex A) and Public Annexes 1 and 2’, Appeals Chamber, ICC-01/04-01/06-3129, 3 March 2015.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Lubanga, 2015, ‘Filing on Reparations and Draft Implementation Plan’, Trust Fund for Victims, ICC-01/04-01/06-3177-Red, 3 November 2015.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Lubanga, 2015, ‘Observations of the Ligue pour la Paix, les Droits de l’Homme et la Justice (LIPADHOJ) on the Draft Implementation Plan Filed by the Trust Fund for Victims on 3 November 2015’, LIPADHOJ, ICC-01/04-01/06-3187-tENG, 17 December 2015.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Lubanga, 2016, ‘Observations of V01 Group of Victims on the “Filing on Reparations and Draft Implementation Plan” Filed by the Trust Fund’, V01 Victim Group, ICC-01/04-01/06-3194-tENG, 1 February 2016.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Lubanga, 2016, ‘Order Instructing the Trust Fund for Victims to Supplement the Draft Implementation Plan’, ICC-01/04-01/06-3198-tENG, Trial Chamber II, 9 February 2016.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Lubanga, 2016, ‘Request for Leave to Appeal Against the “Ordonnance enjoignant au Fonds au profit des victimes de compléter le projet de plan de mise en oeuvre” (9 February 2016)’, Trust Fund for Victims, ICC-01/04-01/06-3200, 15 February 2016.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Lubanga, 2016, ‘First Submission of Victim Dossiers’, Trust Fund for Victims, ICC-01/04-01/06-3208, 31 May 2016.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Lubanga, 2016, ‘Additional Programme Information Filing’, Trust Fund for Victims, ICC-01/04-01/06-3209, 7 June 2016.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Lubanga, 2016, ‘Order Pursuant to Rule 103 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence’, Trial Chamber II, ICC-01/04-01/06-3217-tENG, 15 July 2016.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Lubanga, 2016, ‘Observations of Dr. Golden, Mr. Higson-Smith, Professor Ní Aoláin and Dr. Wühler pursuant to Rule 103 of the Rules of Procedure and Evidence’, Expert Submission, ICC-01/04-01/06-3240-Anx9, Annex 9, 30 September 2016.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Lubanga, 2016, ‘Observation du Gouvernement de la République Démocratique du Congo en Réponse a l’Ordonnance No ICC-01/04-01/06 du 15 Juillet 2016 de la Chambre de Première Instance II de la Cour Pénale Internationale’, Ministère de la Justice, ICC-01/04-01/06-3253-Anx2, 11 October 2016.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Lubanga, 2016, ‘Order Approving the Proposed Plan of the Trust Fund for Victims in Relation to Symbolic Collective Reparations’, Trial Chamber II, ICC-01/04-01/06-3251, 21 October 2016.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Lubanga, 2016, ‘Order Relating to the Request of Public Counsel for Victims of 16 September 2016’, Trial Chamber II, ICC-01/04-01/06-3252-tENG, 21 October 2016.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Lubanga, 2016, ‘Opinion of Judge Herrera Carbuccia’, Trial Chamber II, Annex, ICC-01/04-01/06-3252-Anx-tENG, 25 October 2016.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Lubanga, 2017, ‘Order Approving the Proposed Programmatic Framework for Collective Service-Based Reparations Submitted by the Trust Fund for Victims’, Trial Chamber II, ICC-01/04-01/06-3289, 6 April 2017.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Lubanga, 2017, ‘Decision Setting the Size of the Reparations Award for Which Thomas Lubanga Dyilo Is Liable’, Trial Chamber II, ICC-01/04-01/06-3379-Red-Corr-tENG, 21 December 2017.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Lubanga, 2018, ‘Public Redacted Version of the “Appeal Brief of the Defence for Mr Thomas Lubanga Dyilo Against the ‘Décision fixant le montant des réparations auxquelles Thomas Lubanga est tenu” Handed Down by Trial Chamber II on 15 December 2017’”, Defence, ICC-01/04-01/06-3394-Red-tENG, 15 March 2018.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Lubanga, 2018, ‘Public Version of the Corrigendum to the Appeal Brief Against the “Décision fixant le montant des réparations auxquelles Thomas Lubanga est tenu” Handed Down by Trial Chamber II on 15 December 2017’, V01 Legal Representatives, ICC-01/04-01/06-3396-Corr-Red-tENG, 5 April 2018.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Lubanga, 2019, ‘Submissions Pursuant to the Order of 2 January 2019’, V01 Group of Victims, ICC-01/04-01/06-3436-tENG, 30 January 2019.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Lubanga, 2019, ‘Decision Approving the Proposal of the Trust Fund for Victims on the Process for Locating New Applicants and Determining Their Eligibility for Reparations’, Trial Chamber II, ICC-01/04-01/06-3440-Red-tENG, 7 February 2019.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Lubanga, 2019, ‘Judgment on the Appeals Against Trial Chamber II’s “Decision Setting the Size of the Reparations Award for Which Thomas Lubanga Dyilo Is Liable”’, Appeals Chamber, ICC-01/04-01/06, 18 July 2019.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Lubanga, 2021, ‘Rectificatif de la Version publique expurgée de la Décision faisant droit à la requête du Fonds au profit des victimes du 21 septembre 2020 et approuvant la mise en oeuvre des réparations collectives prenant la forme de prestations de services’, Trial Chamber II, ICC-01/04-01/06-3495-Red-Corr, 5 March 2021.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Katanga, 2014, ‘Judgment Pursuant to Article 74 of the Statute’, Trial Chamber II, ICC-01/04-01/07-3436, 7 March 2014.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Katanga, 2014, ‘Order Instructing the Registry to Report on Applications for Reparations’, Trial Chamber II, ICC-01/04-01/07-3508, 27 August 2014.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Katanga, 2014, ‘Registry Report on Applications for Reparations in Accordance with Trial Chamber II’s Order of 27 August 2014’, ICC Registry, ICC-01/04-01/07-3512, 15 December 2014, Annex I.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Katanga, 2015, ‘Observations des victimes sur les réparations’, Legal Representative of Victims, ICC-01/04-01/07-3514, 27 January 2015.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Katanga, 2015, ‘Observations on Reparations Procedure’, Trust Fund for Victims, ICC-01/04-01/07-3548, 13 May 2015.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Katanga, 2015, ‘Defence Observations on Reparations’, Defence, ICC-01/04-01/07-3549, 14 May 2015.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Katanga, 2015, ‘Submission on Reparations Issues Pursuant to Article 75 of the Statute’, Queen’s University Belfast’s Human Rights Centre and University of Ulster’s Transitional Justice Institute, ICC-01/04-01/07-3551, 14 May 2015.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Katanga, 2015, ‘Observations of the Victims on the Principles and Procedures to Be Applied to Reparations’, ICC-01/04-01/07-3555-tENG, Common Legal Representative of Victims, 15 May 2015.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Katanga, 2015, ‘Réponse Consolidée des Victimes aux Observations Déposée par la Défense, les Participants et les Organisations Invitées à Déposer Leur Observations sur les Principes et la Procédure des Réparations’, Common Legal Representative of Victims, ICC-01/04-01/07-3565, 16 June 2015.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Katanga, 2015, ‘Consolidated Response to the Parties, Participants and Other Interested Persons’ Observations on Reparation’, Defence, ICC-01/04-01/07-3564, 16 June 2015.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Katanga, 2015, ‘Legal Representative’s Observations on the Reduction of Sentence of Germain Katanga’, Legal Representative of Victims, ICC-01/04-01/07-3597-tENG, 18 September 2015.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Katanga, 2016, ‘Requête des Victimes Sollicitant par l’Entremise de la Chambre l’Intervention de la République Démocratique du Congo au Processus des Réparations’, Legal Representative of Victims, ICC-01/04-01/07-3674, 24 March 2016.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Katanga, 2017, ‘Order for Reparations Pursuant to Article 75 of the Statute’, Trial Chamber II, ICC-01/04-01/07-3728-tENG, 24 March 2017.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Katanga, 2017, ‘Notification Pursuant to Regulation 56 of the TFV Regulations Regarding the Trust Fund Board of Director’s Decision Relevant to Complementing the Payment of the Individual and Collective Reparations Awards as Requested by Trial Chamber II in Its 24 March 2017 Order for Reparations’, Trust Fund for Victims, ICC-01/04-01/07-3740, 17 May 2017.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Katanga, 2017, ‘Draft Implementation Plan Relevant to Trial Chamber II’s Order for Reparations of 24 March 2017’, Trust Fund for Victims, ICC-01/04-01/07-3751-Red, 25 July 2017.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Katanga, 2018, ‘Judgment on the Appeals Against the Order of Trial Chamber II of 24 March 2017 entitled “Order for Reparations Pursuant to Article 75 of the Statute”’, Appeals Chamber, ICC-01/04-01/07-3778-Red, 8 March 2018.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Katanga, 2018, ‘Rapport du Représentant légal relatif à l’avancement du processus de mise en œuvre des réparations’, Legal Representative of Victims, ICC-01/04-01/07-3792-Red, 18 May 2018.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Katanga, 2018, ‘Decision on the Matter of the Transgenerational Harm Alleged by Some Applicants for Reparations Remanded by the Appeals Chamber in Its Judgment of 8 March 2018’, Trial Chamber II, ICC-01/04-01/07-3804-Red-tENG, 19 July 2018.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Katanga, 2018, ‘Communication du Représentant légal relative aux vues et préoccupations des victimes bénéficiaires de réparation’, Legal Representative of Victims, ICC-01/04-01/07-3819-Red, 17 December 2018.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Katanga, 2021, ‘Update Report on the Implementation of the Collective Reparations Awards and Request for the Approval of Implementation Proposals Pursuant to Regulation 58 of the Regulations of the Trust Fund’, Trust Fund for Victims, ICC-01/04-01/07-3836-Red, 22 June 2021 (originally published 26 July 2019).Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Katanga, 2021, ‘Second Quarterly Report Pursuant to Regulation 58 of the Regulations of the Trust Fund for Victims and Request for Approval of Implementation Proposal Related to the Housing Assistance Modality’, Trust Fund for Victims, ICC-01/04-01/07-3865-Red, 21 June 2021.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Katanga, 2021, ‘Fourth Quarterly Update Report Pursuant to Regulation 58 of the Regulations of the Trust Fund for Victims’, Trust Fund for Victims, ICC-01/04-01/07-3878-Red, 21 June 2021.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Katanga, 2021, ‘Public Redacted Version of the Fifth Quarterly Update Report Pursuant to Regulation 58 of the Regulations of the Trust Fund for Victims’, Trust Fund for Victims, ICC-01/04-01/07-3885-Red, 19 July 2021.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Al Mahdi, 2017, ‘Reparations Order’, Trial Chamber VIII, ICC-01/12-01/15-236, 17 August 2017.Google Scholar

Prosecutor v Ntaganda, 2021, ‘Reparations Order’, Trial Chamber VI, ICC-01/04-02/06-2659, 8 March 2021.Google Scholar

Situation Democratic Republic of Congo, 2008, ‘Notification of the Board of Directors of the Trust Fund for Victims in Accordance with Regulation 50 of the Regulations of the Trust Fund for Victims with Confidential Annex’, Trust for Victims, ICC-01/04-439, 24 January 2008.Google Scholar

Situation Democratic Republic of Congo, 2008, ‘Decision on the Notification of the Board of Directors of the Trust Fund for Victims in Accordance with Regulation 50 of the Regulations of the Trust Fund’, Pre-Trial Chamber I, ICC-01/04-492, 11 April 2008.Google Scholar

Draft Statute for an International Criminal Court with Commentaries, International Law Commission, text adopted at the 46th session, and published in Yearbook of the International Law Commission, 1994, Vol II(2).Google Scholar

Draft Statute of the International Criminal Court, Working paper submitted by France, Preparatory Committee, UN Doc. A/AC.249/L.3, 6 August 1996.Google Scholar

Proposal of France: Article 45bis Compensation to Victims, Preparatory Committee, UN Doc A/AC.249/1997/WG.4/DP.3, 5 December 1997.Google Scholar

Proposal by the United Kingdom: Article 45bis Reparations, Preparatory Committee, UN Doc A/AC.249/1997/WG.4/ DP.13, 10 December 1997.Google Scholar

Proposal by France and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Article 66 (45bis), Preparatory Committee, UN Doc A/AC.249/1998/WG.4/DP.19, 10 February 1998.Google Scholar

Proposal Submitted by the Delegations of France and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Article 73 Reparations to Victims, UN Diplomatic Conference, Working Group on Procedural Matters, UN Doc A/CONF.183/C.1/WGPM/L.28, 26 June 1998.Google Scholar

Report on the International Seminar on Victims’ Access to the International Criminal Court, Preparatory Commission, UN Doc PCNICC/1999/WGRPE/INF/2, 6 July 1999.Google Scholar

Regulations of the Trust Fund for Victims, ICC-ASP/4/Res.3, 3 December 2005, Annex.Google Scholar

Establishment of the Secretariat of the Trust Fund for Victims, ASP Res 7, 3rd Assembly of States Parties, ICC-ASP/3/Res.7, 10 September 2004.Google Scholar

Reparations, ASP Res 3, 10th Assembly of States Parties, ICC-ASP/10/Res.3, 20 December 2011.Google Scholar

Victims and Reparations, ASP Res 7, 11th Assembly of States Parties, ICC-ASP/11/Res.7, 21 November 2012.Google Scholar

Focal Points (Chile and Finland), 2010, Stocktaking of International Criminal Justice: The Impact of the Rome Statute System on Victims and Affected Communities, Bureau on the impact of the Rome Statute system on victims and affected communities, 9^th Assembly of States Parties, ICC-ASP/9/25, 22 November 2010, Annex II.Google Scholar

Group of Independent Experts, 2020, ‘Independent Expert Review of the International Criminal Court and the Rome Statute System’, Final Report, 30 September 2020. https://asp.icc-cpi.int/iccdocs/asp_docs/ASP19/IER-Final-Report-ENG.pdfGoogle Scholar

ICC (undated), ‘Integrated Strategy for External Relations, Public Information and Outreach’. www.icc-cpi.int/NR/rdonlyres/425E80BA-1EBC-4423-85C6-D4F2B93C7506/185049/ICCPIDSWBOR0307070402_IS_En.pdf (accessed 18 July 2021).Google Scholar

ICC (undated), ‘Victims Before the International Criminal Court: A Guide for the Participation of Victims in the Proceedings of the Court’, Information booklet. www.icc-cpi.int/NR/rdonlyres/8FF91A2C-5274-4DCB-9CCE-37273C5E9AB4/282477/160910VPRSBookletEnglish.pdf (accessed 18 July 2021).Google Scholar

ICC, 2006, Strategic Plan for Outreach of the International Criminal Court, 5th Assembly of States Parties, ICC-ASP/5/12, 29 September 2006.Google Scholar

ICC, 2008, Report on the Activities of the Court, 7th Assembly of States Parties, ICC/ASP/7/25, 29 October 2008.Google Scholar

ICC, 2008, Report of the Bureau on the Assessment of the Regulations of the Trust Fund for Victims, 7th Assembly of States Parties, ICC-ASP/7/32, 12 November 2008.Google Scholar

ICC, 2009, Report of the Court on the Strategy in Relation to Victims, 8th Assembly of States Parties, ICC-ASP/8/45, 10 November 2009.Google Scholar

ICC, 2009, Report of the Court on the Enhancement of the Registry’s Field Operations for 2010, 8th Assembly of States Parties, ICC-ASP/8/33, 4 November 2009.Google Scholar

ICC, 2010, Report of the Bureau on Stocktaking: The Impact of the Rome Statute System on Victims and Affected Communities, 8th Assembly of States Parties, ICC-ASP/8/49, 18 March 2010.Google Scholar

ICC, 2010, Turning the Lens Victims and Affected Communities on the Court and the Rome Statute System, Review Conference of the Rome Statute, RC/ST/V/INF.2, 30 May 2010.Google Scholar

ICC, 2011, Report of the Bureau on the Study Group on Governance, 10th Assembly of States Parties, ICC-ASP/10/30, 22 November 2011.Google Scholar

ICC, 2011, Report of the Bureau on Victims and Affected Communities and Trust Fund for Victims, 10th Assembly of States Parties, ICC-ASP/10/31, 22 November 2011.Google Scholar

ICC, 2012, Court’s Revised Strategy in Relation to Victims, 11th Assembly of States Parties, ICC-ASP/11/38, 5 November 2012.Google Scholar

ICC, 2012, Court Report on Revised Victim Strategy: Past, Present and Future, 11th Assembly of States Parties, ICC-ASP/11/40, 5 November 2012.Google Scholar

ICC, 2014, Report on Activities and Programme Performance of the International Criminal Court for the Year 2013, 13th Assembly of States Parties, ICC-ASP/13/19, 27 May 2014.Google Scholar

ICC, 2015, Report on Activities and Programme Performance of the International Criminal Court for the Year 2014, 14th Assembly of States Parties, ICC-ASP/14/8, 4 May 2015.Google Scholar

ICC, 2019, Report on Activities and Program Performance of the International Criminal Court for the Year 2018, 18th Assembly of States Parties, ICC-ASP/18/3, 25 July 2019.Google Scholar

ICC, 2020, Proposed Programme Budget for 2021 for the International Criminal Court, 19th Assembly of States Parties, ICC-ASP/19/10, 10 September 2020.Google Scholar

ICC, 2014, ‘Guidelines Governing the Relations Between the Court and Intermediaries for the Organs and Units of the Court and Counsel Working with Intermediaries’. www.icc-cpi.int/iccdocs/lt/GRCI-Eng.pdf (accessed 18 July 2021).Google Scholar

ICC PIDS Outreach Unit, 2007, ‘Outreach Report 2007’. www.icc-cpi.int/iccdocs/PIDS/publications/OUR2007Eng.pdf (accessed 18 July 2021).Google Scholar

ICC PIDS Outreach Unit, 2008, ‘Outreach Report 2008’. www.icc-cpi.int/iccdocs/PIDS/publications/OUR2008Eng.pdf (accessed 18 July 2021).Google Scholar

Noguchi, Motoo, 2016, ‘Report of the Board of Directors of the Trust Fund for Victims’, 15th Assembly of States Parties, The Hague, 16 November 2016.Google Scholar

Noguchi, Motoo, 2017, ‘Report of the Board of Directors of the Trust Fund for Victims’, 16th Assembly of State Parties, New York, 4 December 2017.Google Scholar

Trust Fund for Victims, 2008, Report to the Assembly of States Parties on the Activities and Projects of the Board of Directors of the Trust Fund for Victims for the Period 1 July 2007 to 30 June 2008, 7th Assembly of States Parties, ICC-ASP/7/13, 3 September 2008.Google Scholar

Trust Fund for Victims, 2012, Report to the Assembly of State Parties on the Projects and Activities of the Board of Directors of the Trust Fund for Victims for the Period 1 July 2011 to 30 June 2012, 11th Assembly of States Parties, ICC-ASP/11/12, 7 August 2012.Google Scholar

Trust Fund for Victims, 2020, Report to the Assembly of States Parties on the Projects and the Activities of the Board of Directors of the Trust Fund for Victims for the Period 1 July 2019 to 30 June 2020, ICC-ASP/19/14, 16 September 2020.Google Scholar

Trust Fund for Victims, 2008, ‘Trust Fund for Victims: Background Summary’. www.icc-cpi.int/NR/rdonlyres/E582AE21-D718-4798-97ED-C6C9F0D9B42D/0/TFV_Background_Summary_Eng.pdf (accessed 25 January 2022).Google Scholar

Trust Fund for Victims, 2009, ‘Programme Progress Report’. www.trustfundforvictims.org/sites/default/files/imce/TFV%20Programme%20Report%20November%202009.pdf (accessed 19 July 2021).Google Scholar

Trust Fund for Victims, 2011, ‘Summer 2011 Programme Progress Report: Reviewing Rehabilitation Assistance and Preparing for Delivering Reparations’. www.trustfundforvictims.org/sites/default/files/imce/TFV%20Programme%20Report%20Summer%202011.pdf (accessed 19 July 2021).Google Scholar

Trust Fund for Victims, 2011, ‘Programme Progress Report Winter 2011: Earmarked Support at the Trust Fund for Victims’. www.trustfundforvictims.org/sites/default/files/imce/TFV_Programme_Progress_Report_Winter_2011_USA_PRINTING.pdf (accessed 19 July 2021).Google Scholar

Trust Fund for Victims, 2012, ‘Programme Progress Report Summer 2012: Empowering Victims and Communities Towards Social Change’. www.trustfundforvictims.org/sites/default/files/imce/TFV%20PPR%20Summer%202012%20ENG%20Final_.pdf (accessed 19 July 2021).Google Scholar

Trust Fund for Victims, 2015, ‘Programme Progress Report 2015: Assistance and Reparations’. www.legal-tools.org/doc/370265/pdf/ (accessed 19 July 2021).Google Scholar

Trust Fund for Victims, 2016, ‘Annual Report 2016’. www.trustfundforvictims.org/sites/default/files/imce/Annual%20Report-2016_Online_Revised.pdf (accessed 20 July 2021).Google Scholar