Book contents
- Positive Freedom
- Positive Freedom
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction The Multiple Dimensions of Positive Freedom
- Chapter 1 Unity and Disunity in the Positive Tradition
- Chapter 2 Positive Liberty as Realizing the Essence of Man
- Chapter 3 Moral and Personal Positive Freedom
- Chapter 4 Positive Freedom and Freedom of Contract
- Chapter 5 Recognition and Positive Freedom
- Chapter 6 Self-Mastery and the Quality of a Life
- Chapter 7 Basic Freedom in the Real World
- Chapter 8 Reframing Democracy with Positive Freedom
- Chapter 9 Disability and Positive Liberty
- Chapter 10 Positive Freedom and Paternalism
- Chapter 11 Beyond Positive and Negative Liberty
- Chapter 12 Property and Political Power
- Chapter 13 Public Reason, Positive Liberty, and Legitimacy
- Works Cited
- Index
- References
Works Cited
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 03 September 2021
Edited by
Book contents
- Positive Freedom
- Positive Freedom
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction The Multiple Dimensions of Positive Freedom
- Chapter 1 Unity and Disunity in the Positive Tradition
- Chapter 2 Positive Liberty as Realizing the Essence of Man
- Chapter 3 Moral and Personal Positive Freedom
- Chapter 4 Positive Freedom and Freedom of Contract
- Chapter 5 Recognition and Positive Freedom
- Chapter 6 Self-Mastery and the Quality of a Life
- Chapter 7 Basic Freedom in the Real World
- Chapter 8 Reframing Democracy with Positive Freedom
- Chapter 9 Disability and Positive Liberty
- Chapter 10 Positive Freedom and Paternalism
- Chapter 11 Beyond Positive and Negative Liberty
- Chapter 12 Property and Political Power
- Chapter 13 Public Reason, Positive Liberty, and Legitimacy
- Works Cited
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Positive FreedomPast, Present, and Future, pp. 255 - 273Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Works Cited
Alexander, Gregory. 2009. “The Social-Obligation Norm in American Property Law.” Cornell Law Review 94(4): 745–819.Google Scholar
Alexander, Lawrence. 2000. “Deontology at the Threshold.” San Diego Law Review 37(4): 893–912.Google Scholar
Alexander, Lawrence. 2008. “Scalar Properties, Binary Judgments.” Journal of Applied Philosophy 25(2): 85–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, Lawrence. 2013. “Voluntary Enslavement.” In Coons, Christian and Weber, Michael (eds.), Paternalism, Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 231–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, Amy. 2017. The End of Progress: Decolonizing the Normative Foundations of Critical Theory. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Amundson, Ron. 2000. “Against Normal Function.” Studies in the History of Philosophy, Biology, and Biomedical Science 31(1): 33–53.Google Scholar
Anderson, Elizabeth. 2017. Private Government: How Employers Rule Our Lives (and Why We Don’t Talk about It). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, Joel, and Honneth, Axel. 2005. “Autonomy, Vulnerability, Recognition and Justice.” In Christman, John and Anderson, Joel (eds.), Autonomy and the Challenges to Liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 127–149.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1961. “What Is Freedom?” In Between Past and Future. London: Faber & Faber, Chapter 4.Google Scholar
Arneson, Richard J. 1985. “Freedom and Desire.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 3: 425–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asch, Adrienne, and Fine, Michelle. 1988. “Shared Dreams: A Left Perspective on Disability Rights and Reproductive Rights.” In Fine, Michelle and Asch, Adrienne (eds.), Women with Disabilities: Essays in Psychology, Culture, and Politics. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 297–305.Google Scholar
Atkinson, Anthony. 2015. Inequality: What Can Be Done? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumeister, Roy F., and Tierney, John. 2012. Willpower: Rediscovering the Greatest Human Strength, reprint edition. New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Baynton, Douglas. 1996. Forbidden Signs: American Culture and the Campaign Against Sign Language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Baynton, Douglas. 2016. Defectives in the Land: Disability and Immigration in the Age of Eugenics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beauvoir, Simone de. 1976. The Ethics of Ambiguity, trans. Bernard Frechtman. New York: Citadel Press.Google Scholar
Beckert, Jens. 2016. Imagined Futures: Fictional Expectations and Capitalist Dynamics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beito, David T. 2000. From Mutual Aid to the Welfare State: Fraternal Societies and Social Services, 1890–1967. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla. 2004. The Rights of Others: Aliens, Residents, and Citizens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benn, Stanley I., and Weinstein, W. L.. 1973. “Being Free to Act and Being a Free Man.” In Flathman, Richard E. (ed.), Concepts in Social and Political Philosophy. London and New York: Macmillan, 309–324.Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah. 1969a. “Introduction.” In Berlin, Isaiah (ed.), Four Essays on Liberty. New York: Oxford University Press, ix–lxiii.Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah. 1969b. “Two Concepts of Liberty.” In Berlin, Isaiah (ed.), Four Essays on Liberty. New York: Oxford University Press, 112–172.Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah. 1979. “From Hope and Fear Set Free.” In Berlin, Isaiah (ed.), Concepts and Categories: Philosophical Essays. New York: Viking Press, 226–260.Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah. 2002. “Two Concepts of Liberty.” In Hardy, Henry (ed.), Liberty. Oxford University Press, 118–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besson, Samantha. 2005. The Morality of Conflict: Reasonable Disagreement and the Law. Portland, OR: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Bilgrami, Akeel. 2014. “Gandhi (and Marx).” In Secularism, Identity, and Enchantment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 122–174.Google Scholar
Bilgrami, Akeel. 2018. “Some Reflections on the Limits of Liberalism.” Social Scientist 46(7–8): 3–20.Google Scholar
Blaufarb, Rafe. 2016. The Great Demarcation: The French Revolution and the Invention of Modern Property. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bohman, James. 2007. “Beyond Distributive Justice and Struggles for Recognition: Freedom, Democracy, and Critical Theory.” European Journal of Political Theory 6(3): 267–275.Google Scholar
Boice, Robert. 1990. Professors as Writers: A Self-Help Guide to Productive Writing. Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1986. “The Forms of Capital.” In Richardson, J. G. (ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwood, 241–258.Google Scholar
Bratman, Michael. 2000. “Reflection, Planning and Temporally Extended Agency.” The Philosophical Review 109: 35–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brennan, Samantha. 1995. “Thresholds for Rights.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 33(2): 143–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bringhurst, Piper, and Gaus, Gerald. 2018. “Positive Freedom and the General Will.” In Schmidtz, David and Pavel, Carmen (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Freedom. New York: Oxford University Press, 40–58.Google Scholar
tenBroek, Jacobus. 1966. “The Right to Live in the World: The Disabled in the Law of Torts.” California Law Review 54(2) (May): 841–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burch, Susan, and Joyner, Hannah. 2007. Unspeakable: The Story of Junius Wilson. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calabresi, Guido, and Douglas Melamed, A.. 1972. “Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Inalienability: One View of the Cathedral.” Harvard Law Review 85(6): 1089–1128.Google Scholar
Carter, Ian. 2019. “Positive and Negative Liberty.” In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2019 ed.). http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/liberty-positive-negative/ (accessed September 29, 2020).Google Scholar
Chambers, Clare. 2008. Sex, Culture, and Justice: The Limits of Choice. University Park: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
Christiano, Thomas. 2010. “The Uneasy Relationship between Democracy and Capital.” Social Philosophy & Policy 27(1): 195–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christiano, Thomas. 2012. “Money in Politics.” In Estlund, David (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Political Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 241–57.Google Scholar
Christman, John. 1991. “Liberalism and Individual Positive Freedom.” Ethics 101: 343–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christman, John. 1994. The Myth of Property. Toward an Egalitarian Theory of Ownership. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Christman, John. 2005b. “Autonomy, Self-Knowledge and Liberal Legitimacy.” In Christman, John and Anderson, Joel (eds.), Autonomy and the Challenges to Liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 330–358.Google Scholar
Christman, John. 2009. The Politics of Persons: Individual Autonomy and Socio-historical Selves. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Christman, John. 2012. “Can Positive Liberty Be Saved?” In Cahn, Steven M. and Talisse, Robert B. (eds.), Political Philosophy in the 21st Century: Essential Essays. Boulder: Westview Press, 155–168.Google Scholar
Christman, John. 2014. “Coping or Oppression: Autonomy and Adaptation to Circumstance.” In Veltman, Andrea and Piper, Mark (eds.), Autonomy, Oppression and Gender. New York: Oxford University Press, 201–226.Google Scholar
Christman, John. 2015. “Freedom in Times of Struggle: Positive Liberty, Again.” Analyse &Kritik 37(1/2): 171–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christman, John. 2020. “What If Anything Is Wrong with Positive Liberty? The Struggles of Agency in a Non-Ideal World.” In Weinstock, Daniel, Levy, Jacob T., and Maclure, Jocelyn (eds.), Interpreting Modernity: Essays on the Work of Charles Taylor. Montreal, CA: McGill-Queens University Press, 95–113.Google Scholar
Chung, Hun. 2018. “Rawls’s Self-Defeat: A Formal Analysis.” Erkenntnis. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-018-0079-4 (accessed October 2020).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claassen, Rutger. 2015. “The Capability to Hold Property.” Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 16(2): 220–236.Google Scholar
Claassen, Rutger. 2018a. Capabilities in a Just Society. A Theory of Navigational Agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claassen, Rutger. 2018b. “Justice as a Claim to (Social) Property.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 21(5): 631–645.Google Scholar
Claassen, Rutger, and Herzog, Lisa. 2019. “Why Economic Agency Matters: An Account of Structural Domination in the Economic Realm.” European Journal of Political Theory, online first. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1474885119832181.Google Scholar
Clare, Eli. 2009. Exile and Pride: Disability, Queerness, and Liberation. With a new introduction by David Spade. Boston: South End Press.Google Scholar
Coase, R. H. 1937. “The Nature of the Firm.” Economica, New Series IV: 386–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, G. A. 1979. “Capitalism, Freedom and the Proletariat.” In Ryan, Alan (ed.), The Idea of Freedom: Essays in Honor of Isaiah Berlin. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 9–26.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A. 1983. “The Structure of Proletarian Unfreedom.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 12(1): 3–33.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A. 1991. The German Idea of Freedom. University of Chicago. www.youtube.com/watch?v=ey-hYJM7B3I (accessed March 10, 2019).Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A. 2011a. On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice, and Other Essays in Political Philosophy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A. 2011b. “Freedom and Money.” In Otsuka, Michael (ed.), On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice, and Other Essays in Political Philosophy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 166–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. 2010. Rousseau: A Free Community of Equals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, James S. 1990. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cooke, Maeve. 1999. “A Space of One’s Own: Autonomy, Privacy, Liberty.” Philosophy and Social Criticism 25(1): 23–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooke, Maeve. 2013. “Violating Neutrality? Religious Validity Claims and Democratic Legitimacy.” In Calhoun, C., Mendieta, E., and VanAntwerpen, J. (eds.), Habermas and Religion. Cambridge: Polity Press, 249–276.Google Scholar
Cooke, Maeve. 2019. “Nicht-Autoritäre Autorität: Beitrag zu einer kritischen Theorie der Politik’.” In Bohmann, Ulf and Sörensen, Paul (eds.), Eine Kritische Theorie der Politik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 519–539.Google Scholar
Cooke, Maeve. 2020a. “Private Autonomy and Public Autonomy: Tensions in Habermas’s Discourse Theory of Law and Politics.” Kantian Review 25(4): 559–582.Google Scholar
Cooke, Maeve. 2020b. “A Pluralist Model of Politics.” In Kaul, V. and Salvatore, I. (eds.), What Is Pluralism? New Delhi: Routledge, 139–154.Google Scholar
Cooke, Maeve. 2020c. “Self-Efficacious Subjects: Rosa on Alienation and Its Antithesis.” Journal of Political Power 3(3): 366–381.Google Scholar
Cooke, Maeve. 2021. “Existentially Lived Truth or Communicative Reason? Habermas’s Critique of Kierkegaard.” Constellations 28(1): 51–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, John M. 2003. “Stoic Autonomy.” In Paul, E. F., Miller, F. Jr., and Paul, J. (eds.), Autonomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–29.Google Scholar
Constant, Benjamin. 1988. “The Liberty of the Ancients Compared with That of the Moderns.” In Fontana, Biancamaria (ed.), Constant: Political Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 303–307.Google Scholar
Dagan, Hanoch, and Dorfman, Avihay. 2017. “The Human Right to Property.” Theoretical Inquires in Law 18(2): 391–416.Google Scholar
Darby, Derrick. 2009. Rights, Race and Recognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davey, Laura. 2015. “Philosophical Inclusive Design: Intellectual Disability and the Limits of Individual Autonomy in Moral and Political Theory.” Hypatia 30(1) (Winter): 133.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1927a/1916/1980. The Middle Works of John Dewey, Volume 9, 1899–1924: Democracy and Education, 1916. Collected Works of John Dewey. Ed. Boydston, J. A., Baysinger, P., and Levine, P.. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
DiMatteo, Larry A. 1998–1999. “The History of Natural Law Theory: Transforming Embedded Influences into a Fuller Understanding of Modern Contract Law.” University of Pittsburgh Law Review 60: 839–922.Google Scholar
Dimova-Cookson, Maria. 2003. “A New Scheme of Positive and Negative Freedom: Reconstructing T. H. Green on Freedom.” Political Theory 31(4): 508–532.Google Scholar
Dimova-Cookson, Maria. 2019. “Where Does Real Freedom Begin? T.H. Green, P.P. Nicholson and the Necessary but Elusive Binaries of Freedom.” in Collingwood and British Idealism Studies 25: 129–160.Google Scholar
Dimova-Cookson, Maria. 2020. Rethinking Positive and Negative Liberty. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Doppelt, Gerald. 1981. “Rawls” System of Justice: A Critique from the Left.” Noûs 15(3): 259–307.Google Scholar
Dworkin, G. 1983. “Paternalism.” In Sartorius, Rolf (ed.), Paternalism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 19–35.Google Scholar
Dworkin, G. 2020. “Paternalism.” In Zalta, Edward N. (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2020 ed.), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/paternalism/.Google Scholar
Ebels-Duggan, Kyla. 2010. “The Beginning of Community: Politics in the Face of Disagreement.” Philosophical Quarterly 60(238): 50–71.Google Scholar
Edge, Matt. 2013. “A Theory of Freedom.” European Journal of Political Theory 12(4): 368–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elford, Gideon. 2013. “Reclaiming Two Concepts of Liberty.” Politics, Philosophy and Economics 12(3): 228–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, Anthony. 1992. “Deontology, Incommensurability and the Arbitrary.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52: 855–876.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1983. “Sour Grapes – Utilitarianism and the Genesis of Wants.” In Sen, Amartya and Williams, Bernard (eds.), Utilitarianism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 219–238.Google Scholar
Ely, Richard. 1902. “Industrial Liberty.” Publications of the American Economic Association, 3rd Series 3: 59–79.Google Scholar
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Feinberg, Joel. 1978. “Voluntary Euthanasia and the Inalienable Right to Life.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 7: 98–104.Google ScholarPubMed
Feinberg, Joel. 1980. “Legal Paternalism.” In Rights, Justice, and the Bounds of Liberty, Essays in Social Philosophy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 110–129.Google Scholar
Flathman, Richard E. 1984. The Philosophy and Politics of Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Forst, Rainer. 2005. “Political Liberty: Integrating Five Conceptions of Autonomy.” In Christman, John and Anderson, Joel (eds.), Autonomy and the Challenges to Liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 226–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francis, Leslie. 2009. “Understanding Autonomy in Light of Intellectual Disability.” In Brownlee, Kimberly and Cureton, Adam (eds.), Disability and Disadvantage. New York: Oxford University Press, 200–215.Google Scholar
Flikschuh, Katrin. 2012. “Freedom.” In Gaus, Gerald and D’Agonstino, Fred (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Social and Political Philosophy. New York and London: Routledge, 562–575.Google Scholar
Freeden, Michael. 2005. Languages: Ideological Imagination and Twentieth-Century Progressive Thought. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Freeman, Samuel. 2001. “Illiberal Libertarians: Why Libertarianism Is Not a Liberal View.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 30(2): 105–151.Google Scholar
Fried, Barbara H. 2009. The Progressive Assault on Laissez-Faire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gaus, Gerald. 1985. “On Justice and Community: A Reply to Professor Golding.” Bulletin of the Australian Society of Legal Philosophy 9: 197–204.Google Scholar
Gaus, Gerald. 2000. Political Concepts and Political Theories. New York: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Gaus, Gerald. 2010. “The Idea and Ideal of Capitalism.” In Brenkert, George and Beauchamp, Tom (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Business Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 73–99.Google Scholar
Gaus, Gerald. 2011. The Order of Public Reason: A Theory of Freedom and Morality in a Diverse and Bounded World. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gaus, Gerald, and Van Schoelandt, Chad. 2015. “‘Public Reason.’” In Wright, James D. (ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 591–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaus, Gerald, and Van Schoelandt, Chad. 2017. “Consensus on What? Convergence for What?: Four Models of Political Liberalism.” Ethics 128(1): 145–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gewirth, Alan. 1982. Human Rights: Essays on Justification and Applications. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gewirth, Alan. 1996. The Community of Rights. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Gonzalez-Sobrino, Bianca, and Hughey, Matthew W.. 2016. “Colorism.” In Lomotey, Kofi (ed.), People of Color in the United States: Contemporary Issues in Education, Work, Communities, Health, and Immigration, Vol. 2: Employment, Housing, Family, and Community. Santa Barbara, CA: Greenwood, 70–74.Google Scholar
Goodin, Robert, Rice, James Mahmud, Parpo, Antti, and Eriksson, Lina. 2008. Discretionary Time. A New Measure of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodley, Dan. 2011. Disability studies: An Interdisciplinary Introduction. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Gould, C. 1978. Marx’s Social Ontology: Individuality and Community in Marx’s Theory of Social Reality. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gould, C. 1983. “Beyond Causality in the Social Sciences: Reciprocity as a Form of Non-Exploitative Social Relations.” In Cohen, R. S. and Wartofsky, M. W. (eds.), Epistemology, Methodology and the Social Sciences: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 71. Boston and Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 53–88.Google Scholar
Gould, C. 1988. Rethinking Democracy: Freedom and Social Cooperation in Politics, Economy and Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gould, C. 2007. “Transnational Solidarities.” Journal of Social Philosophy 38(1): 146–162.Google Scholar
Gould, C. 2009. “Structuring Global Democracy: Political Communities, Universal Human rights, and Transnational Representation.” Special Issue on Global Democracy and Political Exclusion, Metaphilosophy, 40(1): 24–46 [republished as Global Democracy and Exclusion, Ronald Tinnevelt and Helder De Schutter (eds.). 2010. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell].Google Scholar
Gould, C. 2013. “Retrieving Positive Freedom and Why It Matters.” In Baum, Bruce and Nichols, Robert (eds.), Isaiah Berlin and the Politics of Freedom ‘Two Concepts of Liberty’ 50 Years Later. New York: Routledge, 102–113.Google Scholar
Gould, C. 2014. Interactive Democracy: The Social Roots of Global Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gould, C. 2019. “Protecting Democracy by Extending It: Democratic Management Reconsidered.” Journal of Social Philosophy, 50(4): 513–535.Google Scholar
Gould, C. 2020. “Motivating Solidarity with Distant Others: Empathic Politics and the Problem of Global Justice.” In ed. Brooks, Thom (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Global Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 122–138.Google Scholar
Gourevitch, Alex. 2013. “Labor Republicanism and the Transformation of Work.” Political Theory 41(4): 591–617.Google Scholar
Graby, S., and Greenstein, A. 2016. “Relational Autonomy and Disability: Beyond Normative Constructs and Post-structralist Deconstructions”. In Mallett, R, Ogden, C., and Slater, J. (eds.), Precarious Positions: Theorising Normalcy and the Mundane. Chester: University of Chester Press, 228–259.Google Scholar
Green, Jeffrey. 2016. “Liberalism and the Problem of Plutocracy.” Constellations 23 (1): 84–95.Google Scholar
Green, T. H. 1924/1907/1890. Prolegomena to Ethics, 5th ed., ed. Bradley, A. C.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Green, T.H. 1931/1999. Lectures on the Principles of Political Obligation. Kitchener: Batoche Books.Google Scholar
Green, T.H. 1986a. “Lecture on ‘Liberal Legislation and Freedom of Contract’.” In Harris, Paul and Morrow, John (eds.), Lectures on the Principles of Political Obligation and Other Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 194–212.Google Scholar
Green, T.H. 1986b. “Lectures on the Principles of Political Obligation.” In Harris, Paul and Morrow, John (eds.), Lectures on the Principles of Political Obligation and Other Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 13–93.Google Scholar
Green, T.H. 1986c. “On the Different Senses of “Freedom” as Applied to Will and to the Moral Progress of Man.” In Harris, Paul and Morrow, John (eds.), Lectures on the Principles of Political Obligation and Other Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 228–249.Google Scholar
Gutmann, Thomas 2013. “Some Preliminary Remarks on a Liberal Theory of Contract.” Law and Contemporary Problems 76: 39–55.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1990. “Discourse Ethics: Notes on a Program of Philosophical Justification.” In his Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action, trans. C. Lenhardt and S. Weber Nicholsen. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 43–115.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1995. “Reconciliation through the Public Use of Reason: Remarks on John Rawls’s Political Liberalism.” Translated by C. Cronin. Journal of Philosophy XCII (3): 109–131.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1996. Between Facts and Norms, trans. W. Rehg. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 2003. The Future of Human Nature, trans. W. Rehg, M. Pensky, and H. Beister. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 2008. Between Naturalism and Religion: Philosophical Essays, trans. Ciaran Cronin. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Derek. 2020. “Denied a Diploma, April Dunn Made Sure Other Students with Disabilities Had Options. She Died of Covid-19.” The Washington Post, April 18, 2020. www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2020/04/18/denied-diploma-april-dunn-made-sure-other-students-with-disabilities-had-options-she-died-covid-19/ (accessed online on April 26, 2020).Google Scholar
Hedrick, Todd. 2019. Reconciliation and Reification: Freedom's Semblance and Actuality from Hegel to Contemporary Critical Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1965. Hegel’s Philosophy of Right, trans. T. M. Knox. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter. 2008. Between Kant and Hegel: Essays on German Idealism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hevia, Martin. 2007. “Kronman on Contract Law and Distributive Justice.” Journal of Contract Law 23: 105–119.Google Scholar
Hirschmann, Nancy J. 1996. “Toward a Feminist Theory of Freedom.” Political Theory 24(1) (February): 46–67.Google Scholar
Hirschmann, Nancy J. 2003. The Subject of Liberty: Toward a Feminist Theory of Freedom. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hirschmann, Nancy J. 2008. Gender, Class, and Freedom in Modern Political Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hirschmann, Nancy J. 2015. “Invisible Disability: Seeing, Being, Power.” In Hirschmann, Nancy J. and Linker, Beth (eds.), Civil Disabilities: Citizenship, Membership, and Belonging. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, Chapter 10.Google Scholar
Hirschmann, Nancy J. 2020. “What’s Right with Positive Liberty: Agency, Autonomy, and the Other.” In Weinstock, Daniel, Levy, Jacob T. and Maclure, Jocelyn (eds.), Interpreting Modernity: Essays on the Work of Charles Taylor. Montreal, CA: McGill-Queens University Press, Chapter 7.Google Scholar
Hirschmann, Nancy J. n.d. “Disability Rights: A Question of Justice? Or a Question of Freedom?” In Langord, Malcoml and Stein, Michael (eds.), Disability Social Rights. Cambridge University Press, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Hobhouse, L. T. 1994. Liberalism and Other Essays. Ed. Meadowcroft, James. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hobson, J. A. 1974. The Crisis of Liberalism. Ed. Clarke, P. F.. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Hodgson, Geoffrey M. 2015. Conceptualizing Capitalism. Institutions, Evolution, Future. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Honoré, A. M. 1987. “Ownership.” In Honore, A. M. (ed.), Making Law Bind: Essays Legal and Philosophical. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 161–192.Google Scholar
Honneth, A. 2007a. “Between Aristotle and Kant: Recognition and Moral Obligation.” In Honneth, A. (ed.), Disrespect: The Normative Foundations of Critical Theory. Cambridge. Polity Press, 129–143.Google Scholar
Honneth, A. 2007b. “Negative Freedom and Cultural Belonging: An Unhealthy Tension in the Political Philosophy of Isaiah Berlin.” In Honneth, A. (ed.), Disrespect: The Normative Foundations of Critical Theory. Cambridge. Polity Press, 240–253.Google Scholar
Honneth, A. 2007c. “Post-Traditional Communities: A Conceptual Proposal.” In Honneth, A. (ed.), Disrespect: The Normative Foundations of Critical Theory. Cambridge. Polity Press, 254–262.Google Scholar
Honneth, A. 2012. The I in the We: Studies in the Theory of Recognition. Cambridge. Polity Press.Google Scholar
Honneth, A. 2014. Freedom’s Right: The Social Foundations of Democratic Life. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Honneth, A. 2015a. “On the Poverty of Our Freedom: Relevance and Limits of the Hegelian Ethical System.” In Dumouchel, Paul and Gotoh, Reiko (eds.), Social Bonds as Freedom: Revisiting the Dichotomy of the Universal and the Particular. New York: Berghahn, 109–124.Google Scholar
Honneth, A. 2015b. “Freedom, Solidarity, and Democracy: An Interview with Axel Honneth.” Conducted by Morten Raffnsoe-Moller. In Jakobsen, J. and Lysaker, O. (eds.), Freedom and Recognition. Leiden: Brill, 260–282.Google Scholar
Humboldt, W. von. 1854/1993. The Limits of State Action, ed. Burrow, J.. Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Hurley, S. 1989. Natural Reasons: Personality and Polity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ingram, D. 2018. World Crisis and Underdevelopment: A Critical Theory of Poverty, Agency, and Coercion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ingram, D. 2020. “When Microcredit Doesn’t Empower Women: Recognition Theory’s Contribution to the Debate Over Adaptive Preferences.” In Schweiger, G. (ed.), Poverty, Inequality and the Critical Theory of Recognition. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 227–260.Google Scholar
Jamieson, Beth Kiyoko. 2003. Real Choices: Feminism, Freedom, and the Limits of Law. University Park: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
Jiang, Tao. 2011. “Two Notions of Freedom in Classical Chinese Thought: The Concept of Hua 化 in the Zhuangzi and the Xunzi.” Dao 10: 463–486.Google Scholar
Jiang, Tao. 2012. “Isaiah Berlin’s Challenge to the Zhuangzian Freedom.” Journal of Chinese Philosophy 39: 69–92.Google Scholar
Kafer, Alison. 2017 “Bodies of Nature: The Environmental Politics of Disability.” In Ray, Sarah Jaquette and Sibara, Jay (eds.), Disability Studies and the Environmental Humanities: Toward an Eco-Crip Theory. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 201–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, Thomas. 1994. “Property, Sovereignty, the Declaration of the Rights of Man, and the Tradition of French Jurisprudence.” In Van Kley, Dale (ed.), The French Idea of Freedom: The Old Regime and the Declaration of 1789. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 300–339.Google Scholar
Keates, Simeon, and Clarkson, John. 2003. Countering Design Exclusion: An Introduction to Inclusive Design. London: Springer London.Google Scholar
Keh, Andrew. 2020. “A Lot of Athletes Seem to Have the Coronavirus. Here Are Some Reasons.” The New York Times, July 10.Google Scholar
Kittay, Eva Feder. 2011. “Forever Small: The Strange Case of Ashley X.” Hypatia 26(3): 610–631.Google Scholar
Knight, Amber. 2017. “Disability and the Meaning of Reproductive Liberty.” Politics, Groups, and Identities 5(1): 67–83.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, C. M. 1996. The Sources of Normativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Landemore, Hélène, and Ferreras, Isabelle. 2016. “In Defense of Workplace Democracy: Towards a Justification of the Firm–State Analogy.” Political Theory 44(1): 53–81.Google Scholar
Leland, R. J., and van Wietmarschen, Han. 2017. “Political Liberalism and Political Community.” Journal of Moral Philosophy 14(2): 142–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, Jonathan. 2017. “Capital as Process and the History of Capitalism.” Business History Review 91: 483–510.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Charles. 2001. The Market System. What It Is, How It Works, and What to Make of It. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
List, Christian, and Pettit, Philip. 2011. Group Agency: The Possibility, Design, and Status of Corporate Agents. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1967. Two Treatises of Government. Ed. Laslett, Peter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lomasky, Loren. 1987. Persons, Rights, and the Moral Community. Oxford: Oxford UniversityGoogle Scholar
Lomasky, Loren. 1998. “Libertarianism as If (The Other 99 Percent of) People Mattered.” Social Philosophy & Policy 15(2): 350–371.Google Scholar
Lomasky, Loren. 2005. “Libertarianism at Twin Harvard.” Social Philosophy & Policy 22(1): 178–199.Google Scholar
MacCallum, Gerald C. 1967. “Negative and Positive Freedom.” The Philosophical Review 76(3): 312. doi:10.2307/2183622.Google Scholar
MacGilvray, Eric. 2011. The Invention of Market Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mack, Eric. 2010. “The Natural Right of Property.” Social Philosophy & Policy 27(1): 53–78.Google Scholar
Macpherson, C. B. 1973. Democratic Theory: Essays in Retrieval. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marneffe, Peter de. 1994. “Contractualism, Liberty, and Democracy.” Ethics 104(4): 764–783.Google Scholar
Marshall, T. H. 1950. Citizenship and Social Class and Other Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1975. “On the Jewish Question.” In Hare, Q. (ed.), Early Writings. London: Penguin Books, 211–242.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1994a. “Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right.” In O’Malley, J. (ed.), Early Political Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1994b. “On the Jewish Question.” In O’Malley, J. (ed.), Early Political Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 28–56.Google Scholar
Mazzucato, Mariana. 2018. The Value of Everything. Making and Taking in the Global Economy. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
McCormick, John. 2006. “Contain the Wealthy and Patrol the Magistrates: Restoring Elite Accountability to Popular Government.” American Political Science Review 100(2): 147–163.Google Scholar
McCormick, John. 2011. Machiavellian Democracy. Cambridge, England/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McKenna, M. 2013. “Resisting the Manipulation Argument: A Hard-Liner Takes It on the Chin,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 89(2): 467–484.Google Scholar
Mensch, Betty. 1980–1981. “Freedom of Contract as Ideology.” Stanford Law Review 33: 753–772.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1978/1859. On Liberty, ed. Rapaport, E.. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart, and Robson, J. M.. 1981/1824. “Periodical Literature: Edinburgh Review.” In Robson, John M. (ed.), Collected Works. Vol. 1. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1991. “Considerations on Representative Government.” In Gray, John (ed.), On Liberty and Other Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 205–470.Google Scholar
Mintz, Kevin Todd. 2014. “Sexual Intimacy, Social Justice, and Severe Disabilities: Should Fair Equality of Opportunity in Health Extend to Surrogate Partner Therapy?” The Journal of Philosophy, Science & Law: Disability 14(3): 4–15.Google Scholar
Moehler, Michael. 2018. Minimal Morality: A Multilevel Social Contract Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Morgan, Anne. 2008. “Simone de Beauvoir’s Ethics of Freedom and Absolute Evil.” Hypatia 23(4): 75–89.Google Scholar
Motchoulski, Alexander, and Smolenski, Phil. 2019. “Principles of Collective Choice and Constraints of Fairness: Why the Difference Principle Would Be Chosen behind the Veil of Ignorance.” The Journal of Philosophy 116(12): 678–690.Google Scholar
Muldoon, Ryan. 2016. Social Contract Theory for a Diverse World: Beyond Tolerance. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muldoon, Ryan. 2017. “Perspectives, Norms, and Agency.” Social Philosophy & Policy 34(1): 260–276.Google Scholar
Muldoon, Ryan et al.. 2014. “Disagreement behind the Veil of Ignorance.” Philosophical Studies 170(3): 377–394.Google Scholar
Nagel, T. 2001. “Pluralism and Coherence.” In Lilla, M., Dworkin, R., and Silvers, R. B. (eds.), The Legacy of Isaiah Berlin. New York: The New York Review of Books, 105–111.Google Scholar
Neufeld, Blain, and Van Schoelandt, Chad. 2014. “Political Liberalism, Ethos Justice, and Gender Equality.” Law and Philosophy 33(1): 75–104.Google Scholar
Neufeld, Blain, and Watson, Lori. 2018. “The Tyranny – or the Democracy – of the Ideal?” Cosmos + Taxis 5(2): 47–61.Google Scholar
Neuhouser, Frederick. 2000. Foundations of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right. Actualizing Freedom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ni, Peimin. 2002. “The Confucian Account of Freedom.” In Xinyan, Jiang (ed.), The Examined Life: Chinese Perspectives. Binghampton, NY: Global Academic Publishing, 119–140.Google Scholar
Nicholson, Peter P. 1985. “T. H. Green and State Action: Liquor Legislation.” History of Political Thought 6(3): 517–550.Google Scholar
Nicholson, Peter P. 1990. The Political Philosophy of the British Idealists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nicholson, Peter P. (ed.). 1997. Collected Works of T.H. Green. Vol. 5. Bristol: Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1978. A Nietzsche Reader, reprint edition, trans. R. J. Hollingdale. Harmondsworth and New York: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
Nozick, Robert. 1981. Philosophical Explanations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, M. 2001. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Okin, Susan Moller. 1991. Justice, Gender, and the Family, reprint edition. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Martin, and Williamson, Thad (eds.). 2012. Property-Owning Democracy: Rawls and Beyond. West Sussex: Wiley.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Oudejans, N. 2019. “The Right Not to Have Rights: A New Perspective on Irregular Immigration.” Political Theory 47(4): 447–474.Google Scholar
Owens, D. 2000. Reason without Freedom: The Problem of Epistemic Normativity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Parent, William A. 1974. “Some Recent Work on the Concept of Liberty.” American Philosophical Review 11(3): 149–167.Google Scholar
Parijs, Philippe van. 1995. Real Freedom for All: What (If Anything) Can Justify Capitalism? Oxford: The Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Parijs, Philippe van. 2003. “Difference Principles.” In Freeman, Samuel (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Rawls. New York: Cambridge University Press, 200–240.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole. 1970. Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Patterson, O. 1982. Slavery and Social Death: A Comparative Study. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Peters, Bernhard. 1994. “On Reconstructive Legal and Political Theory.” Philosophy and Social Criticism 20(4): 101–134.Google Scholar
Pettersen, Tove. 2015. “Existential Humanism and Moral Freedom in Simone de Beauvoir’s Ethics.” In Pettersen, Tove and Bjørsnøs, Annlaug (eds.), Simone de Beauvoir – A Humanist Thinker. Leiden/Boston: Brill/Rodopi, 69–91.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. 1997a. Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. 1997b. “Freedom with Honor: A Republican Ideal.” Social Research 53(1) (Spring): 52–76.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. 2002. “Keeping Republican Theory Simple: On a Difference with Quentin Skinner.” Political Theory 30(3) (June): 339–356.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. 2009. “Republican Freedom: Three Axioms, Four Theorems.” In Laborde, C. and Maynor, J. (eds.), Republicanism and Political Theory. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 102–130.Google Scholar
Pettit, P. 2012. On the People’s Terms: A Republican Theory and Model of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Piketty, Thomas. 2014. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Pincione, Guido 2007. “The Trolley Problem as a Problem for Libertarians.” Utilitas 19(4): 407–429.Google Scholar
Pippin, Robert B. 2008. Hegel’s Practical Philosophy: Rational Agency as Ethical Life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pistor, Katharina. 2019. The Code of Capital: How the Law Creates Wealth and Inequality. Princeton, NJ and New York: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pitkin, Hanna. 1988. “Are Freedom and Liberty Twins.” Political Theory 16(4) (November): 523–552.Google Scholar
Price, Margaret. 2015. “The Bodymind Problem and the Possibilities of Pain.” Hypatia 30(1) (Winter): 268–284.Google Scholar
Quante, Michael. 2015. “Max Stirners Kreuzzug gegen die Heiligen, oder: Die Selbstaufhebung des Antiperfektionismus.” In Quante, M. and Mohseni, A. (Hrgs.), Die linken Hegelianer. Fink: München, 245–263.Google Scholar
Quong, Jonathan. 2005. “Disagreement, Asymmetry, and Liberal Legitimacy.” Politics, Philosophy and Economics 4(3): 301–330.Google Scholar
Radin, Margaret Jane 1987. “Market-Inalienability.” Harvard Law Review 100: 1849–1937.Google Scholar
Rahman, K. Sabeel. 2017. “Democracy against Domination: Contesting Economic Power in Progressive and Neorepublican Political Theory.” Contemporary Political Theory 16(1): 41–64.Google Scholar
Railton, P. 2003. “Facts and Values.” In Facts, Values and Norms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 43–68.Google Scholar
Retief, Marno and Letšosa, Rantoa. 2018. “Models of Disability: A Brief Overview.” HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies 74(1), https://doi.org/ 10.4102/hts.v74i1.4738 (accessed online April 1, 2020).Google Scholar
Roberts, Dorothy. 2016. “The Ethics of Biosocial Science.” In Matheson, M. (ed.), The Tanner Lectures in Human Values, Vol. 37. . Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press, 99–142.Google Scholar
Robeyns, I. 2011. “The Capabilities Approach.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/capability-approach/#SpeCapApp (August 2020).Google Scholar
Robeyns, I. 2017. “Having Too Much.” In Knight, Jack and Schwartzberg, Melissa (eds.), Nomos LVIII: Wealth. New York: New York University Press, 1–44.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Anat 2013. “Contract’s Meaning and the Histories of Classical Contract Law.” McGill Law Journal 59: 165–207.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J.-J. 1760/1987. Basic Political Writings, ed. Cress, D.. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J.-J. 1997. “Discourse on Political Economy.” In Gourevitch, Victor (ed.), The Social Contract and Other Later Political Writings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3–38.Google Scholar
Ruddick, Sara. 1989. Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. M. 1998. What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schmidtz, David, and Brennan, Jason. 2010. A Brief History of Liberty. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schneewind, Jerome B. 1998. The Invention of Autonomy: A History of Modern Moral Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schweik, Susan. 2010. Ugly Laws: Disability in Public. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Sen, A. 1993. “Capability and Well-Being.” In Nussbaum, Martha and Sen, Amartya (eds.), The Quality of Life. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 30–53.Google Scholar
Sensen, Oliver. 2017. “Kant.” In Gaus, Gerald and Turner, Piers (eds.), Public Reason in Political Philosophy: Classic Sources and Contemporary Commentaries. New York: Routledge, Chapter 4.Google Scholar
Shapin, Steven. 1996. The Scientific Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sidgwick, Henry. 1897. The Elements of Politics, 2nd ed. London and New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Siebers, Tobin. 2010. “In the Name of Pain.” In Metzl, Jonathan M. and Kirkland, Anna (eds.), Against Health: How Health Became the New Morality. New York: New York University Press, 183–194.Google Scholar
Simhony, Avital. 1991. “On Forcing Individuals to Be Free: T.H. Green’s Liberal Theory of Positive Freedom.” Political Studies 39: 303–320.Google Scholar
Simhony, Avital. 1993. “Beyond Negative and Positive Freedom: T.H. Green’s View of Freedom.” Political Theory 10(1): 28–54.Google Scholar
Simhony, Avital. 2019. “MacCallum, Baldwin and Green on Freedom.” Collingwood and British Idealism Studies 25: 101–128.Google Scholar
Simmons, A. J. 2010. “Ideal and Non-Ideal Theory.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 38(1): 5–36.Google Scholar
Singer, Abraham. 2018. The Form of the Firm: A Normative Political Theory of the Corporation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Singer, Peter. 1993. “Taking Life: Humans.” In Practical Ethics, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 38–50.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 2002. “A Third Concept of Liberty.” Proceedings of the British Academy 117: 237–268.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 2012. Liberty before Liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Spector, Horacio. 2006. “Philosophical Foundations of Labor Law.” Florida State University Law Review 33: 1119–1148.Google Scholar
Spector, Horacio. 2010. “Four Conceptions of Freedom.” Political Theory 38(6): 780–808.Google Scholar
Spector, Horacio. 2013. “Autonomy.” In Gaus, Gerald and Agostino, Fred D. (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Social and Political Philosophy. New York and London: Routledge, 573–584.Google Scholar
Stalley, R. F. 1998. “Plato’s Doctrine of Freedom.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 98(2): 145–158.Google Scholar
Steiner, H. 1983. “How Free: Computing Personal Liberty.” In Griffiths, A. Phillips (ed.), Of Liberty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 73–90.Google Scholar
Stemplowska, Z. 2008. “What’s Ideal about Ideal Theory?” Social Theory and Practice 34(3) (July): 319–340.Google Scholar
Stiglitz, Joseph. 2012. The Price of Inequality. London and New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Stirner, Max. 1995. The Ego and Its Own, ed. Leopold, David. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Strawson, P. F. 1961. “Social Morality and Individual Ideal.” Philosophy 36(136): 1–17.Google Scholar
Strawson, P. F. 1962. “Freedom and Resentment.” Proceedings of the British Academy 48: 1–25.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. 1979. “What’s Wrong with Negative Liberty?” In Ryan, A. (ed.), The Idea of Freedom, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 175–194.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. 1985a. “What’s Wrong with Negative Liberty?” In Philosophical Papers 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 211–219.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. 1985b. “The Diversity of Goods.” In Philosophy and the Human Sciences: Philosophical Papers 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 230–247.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. 1989a. Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. 1989b. “Cross-Purposes: The Liberal-Communitarian Debate.” In Rosenblum, N. (ed.), Liberalism and the Moral Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 159–182.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. 2006. “What’s Wrong with Negative and Positive Liberty.” In Miller, David (ed.), The Liberty Reader. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 141–162.Google Scholar
Terzi, Lorella. 2015. “Cognitive Disability, Capability Equality, and Citizenship.” In Hirschmann, Nancy J. and Linker, Beth (eds.), Civil Disabilities: Citizenship, Membership, and Belonging. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 186–203.Google Scholar
Thaler, Richard H., and Sunstein, Cass R.. 2014. Why Nudge? The Politics of Libertarian Paternalism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, Alan. 2017. Republic of Equals. Predistribution and Property-Owning Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Michael. 2018. “The Political Dimensions of Economic Division: Republicanism, Social Justice and the Evaluation of Economic Inequality.” In Langman, Lauren and Smith, David (eds.), Twenty-First Century Inequality & Capitalism: Piketty, Marx and Beyond. Leiden: Brill, 201–221.Google Scholar
Thomson, Judith Jarvis. 1976. “Self-Defense and Rights.” The Lindley Lecture, University of Kansas.Google Scholar
Thomson, Judith Jarvis. 1990. The Realm of Rights. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Thomson, Rosemary Garland. 1997. Extraordinary Bodies: Figuring Physical Disability in American Culture and Literature. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Towle, Evan B. and Morgan, Lynn M.. 2002. “Romancing the Transgender Native: Rethinking the Use of the ‘Third Gender’ Concept.” GLQ 8(4): 469–497.Google Scholar
Tremain, Shelley. 2001. “On the Government of Disability.” Social Theory and Practice, October 2001, 27(4) (October): 617–636.Google Scholar
Tremain, Shelley. 2018. “Philosophy of Disability as Critical Diversity Studies.” International Journal of Critical Diversity Studies 1(1) (June): 30–44.Google Scholar
Tronto, Joan C. 2013. Caring Democracy: Markets, Equality, and Justice. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Tutor, Andrés. 2018. “Isaiah Berlin on Positive Freedom.” International Philosophical Quarterly 58(4): 407–422.Google Scholar
Tyler, Colin. 2010. The Metaphysics of Self-realization and Freedom. Exeter: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
“Unconscionable contracts.” Legal Information Institute, Cornell University Law School at www.law.cornell.edu/wex/unconscionability (August 2020).Google Scholar
Vallier, Kevin. 2014. Liberal Politics and Public Faith: Beyond Separation. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
VanDeVeer, Donald. 1986. Paternalistic Intervention: The Moral Bounds of Benevolence. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Van Meeteren, M. 2009. “Striving for a Better Position: Aspirations and the Role of Cultural, Economic, and Social Capital for Irregular Migrants in Belgium” International Immigration Review 43(4) (Winter): 881–897.Google Scholar
Van Schoelandt, Chad. 2015. “Justification, Coercion, and the Place of Public Reason.” Philosophical Studies 172(4): 1031–1050.Google Scholar
Van Schoelandt, Chad. 2018. “Moral Accountability and Social Norms.” Social Philosophy & Policy 35(1): 217–236.Google Scholar
Van Schoelandt, Chad. 2020. “Functionalist Justice and Coordination.” Social Theory and Practice 46(2): 417–440.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. 2005. “Moral Autonomy and Personal Autonomy.” In Christman, John and Anderson, Joel (eds.), Autonomy and the Challenges to Liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 307–329.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. 2006. “Homelessness and the Issue of Freedom.” In Goodin, R. and Pettit, Ph. (eds.), Contemporary Political Philosophy. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 432–448.Google Scholar
Wall, S. 2016. “Autonomy as a Perfection.” American Journal of Jurisprudence 61(2): 175–194.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael. 1983. Spheres of Justice. A Defense of Pluralism and Equality. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Watson, G. 2004. The Work of the Will. In Agency and Answerability: Selected Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 123–157.Google Scholar
Weinstein, W. L. 1966. “The Concept of Liberty in Nineteenth Century English Political Thought.” Political Studies 13: 145–162.Google Scholar
Wellmer, Albrecht 1998. “Models of Freedom in the Modern World”. In Endgames, trans. D. Midgely. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 3–37.Google Scholar
Wendell, Susan. 1996. The Rejected Body: Feminist Philosophical Reflections on Disability. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Wilson, Robert Anton. 2016. Prometheus Rising, 2nd ed. Grand Junction, CO: Hilaritas Press.Google Scholar
Winters, Jeffrey A. 2011. Oligarchy. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Winters, Jeffrey A. 2017. “Wealth Defense and the Complicity of Liberal Democracy.” In Knight, Jack and Schwartzberg, Melissa (eds.), Nomos LVIII: Wealth. New York: New York University Press, 158–225.Google Scholar
Zamir, Eyal, and Medina, Barak 2010. Law, Economics, and Morality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar