Science into policy: The European Environment Agency

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511777141.013

13 - Science into policy: The European Environment Agency

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 October 2011

Sven Dammann and

David Gee

Edited by

Justus Lentsch and

Peter Weingart

Show author details

Sven Dammann: Affiliation:
European Commission, Directorate General for Energy
David Gee: Affiliation:
European Environment Agency
Justus Lentsch: Affiliation:
Heinrich Böll Foundation
Peter Weingart: Affiliation:
Universität Bielefeld, Germany

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Providing environmental information and framing the discourse – the EEA's tasks and institutional settings

The European Environment Agency (EEA) is a specialised agency of the European Union (EU), dedicated to supporting sustainable development and to helping achieve significant and measurable improvements in Europe's environment, through the provision of timely, targeted, relevant and reliable information on the environment (EEA 2004). Main clients of the Agency's indicator- and case study-based assessments are the European Commission, the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union – especially through the EU-presidencies – and the thirty-two member states of the EEA (membership of the EEA is also open to countries that are not among the twenty-seven member states of the EU). Its seat is in the Danish capital Copenhagen.

The EEA currently has an annual budget of circa €40 million and approximately 180 staff members.

The EEA has been operational since 1994. Its founding regulation's Article 1 (EEC 1990) defines its role as follows:

To achieve the aims of environmental protection and improvement laid down by the Treaty and by successive Community action programmes on the environment, the objective [of the EEA] shall be to provide the Community and the Member States with:

objective, reliable and comparable information at European level enabling them to take the requisite measures to protect the environment, to assess the results of such measures and to ensure that the public is properly informed about the state of the environment,
to that end, the necessary technical and scientific support …

Type: Chapter
Information: The Politics of Scientific Advice
Institutional Design for Quality Assurance
, pp. 238 - 258

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511777141.013 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Cash, David W., Clark, William C., Alcock, Frank, Dickson, Nancy M., Eckley, Noelle, Guston, David H., Jäger, Jilland Mitchell, Ronald B. 2003. Knowledge Systems for Sustainable Development, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA – National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar PubMed

Clark, William C., Mitchell, Ronald, Cash, David, Alcock, Frank and John, F. Kennedy School of Government 2002. Information as Influence: How Institutions Mediate the Impact of Scientific Assessments on Global Environmental Affairs, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Faculty Research Working Papers Series, RWP02–044.Google Scholar

,Codex Alimentarius 2007. Principles for Risk Analysis for Food Safety, Rome: FAO/WHO.Google Scholar

EC 2001. Regulation (EC) No. 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents, OJ L 145/43, 31 May 2001.

,EEA 2001. Late Lessons from Early Warnings: The Precautionary Principle 1896–2000. Environmental Issues Report No. 22, Copenhagen. (Edited by: Poul, Harremoës (chairman), Malcolm, MacGarvin (executive editor), Andy, Stirling, Brian, Wynne and Jane, Keys (editors), David, Gee and Sofia, Guedes Vaz (EEA editors).)Google Scholar

,EEA 2003. State of the Environment Report No 3/2003, available at: www.eea.europa.eu/publications/environmental_assessment_report_2003_10.

,EEA 2004. The European Environment Agency – Who We Are – What We Do – How We Do It, available at: http://org.eea.europa.eu/documents/brochure2004/general_brochure_web-EN.pdf.

,EEA 2005a. EEA core set of indicators, EEA Technical Report 1/2005, Copenhagen.Google Scholar

,EEA 2005b. The European Environment – State and Outlook, Copenhagen.Google Scholar

,EEA 2008. Draft EEA Quality manual (internal working document).

,EEA 2010. The European Environment State and Outlook Report, Copenhagen.

,EEC 1990. Regulation (EEC) No. 1210/90 of 7 May 1990 on the establishment of the European Environment Agency and the European Environment Information and Observation Network, OJ L 120, 11 May 1990, pp. 1–6.

,European Commission 2001. European Governance – A White Paper, COM(2001) 428 final, Brussels, 25 July 2001.Google Scholar

Funtowicz, S.O. and Ravetz, J.R. 1990. Uncertainty and Quality in Science for Policy, Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRef Google Scholar

Gee, David 2006. ‘Late lessons from early warnings: Toward realism and precaution with endocrine-disrupting substances’, Environmental Health Perspectives 114 (supplement 1, April 2006): 152–60.CrossRef Google Scholar

Guston, David H. 2001. ‘Boundary organizations in environmental policy and science: An introduction’, Science Technology & Human Values 26: 399.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hansen, Steffen Foss, Krayer, Krauss, Martin, P. and Tickner, Joel A. 2007. ‘Categorizing mistaken false positives in regulation of human and environmental health’, Risk Analysis 27/1: 255–69.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hill, Austin Bradford 1965. ‘Environment and disease: Association or causation?’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine 58: 295–300.Google Scholar PubMed

Majone, G. 1997. ‘The new European agencies: Regulation by information’, Journal of European Public Policy 4/2: 262–75.CrossRef Google Scholar

,National Academy of Sciences 2008. Science and Decisions: Advancing Risk Assessment, WashingtonDC.Google Scholar

,OECD 1993. ‘Core set of indicators for Environmental Performance Reviews’, OJ L 267, 20 October 2000, Code of Good Administrative Behaviour, Relations with the public.

,Royal Commision on Environmental Pollution 1998. Environmental Standards, London: Stationery Office.Google Scholar

,SETAC (Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry) 2002. Interconnections between Human Health and Ecological Integrity.

,US Presidential Commision on Risk Assessment and Risk Management 1997. Final Report, WashingtonDC.Google Scholar

Sluijs, J. P. 2002. ‘A way out of the credibility crisis of models used in integrated environmental assessment', Futures 34: 133–46.CrossRef Google Scholar

Wahlström, Bo 1999. ‘The precautionary approach to chemicals management: A Swedish perspecive’, in Carolyn, Raffensperger and Tickner, Joel A. (eds.), Protecting Public Health and the Environment; Implementing the Precautionary Principle, Washington DC: Island Press, pp. 51–69.Google Scholar

Waterton, C. and Wynne, B. 2004. ‘Knowledge and political order in the European Environment Agency’, in Jasanoff, S. (ed.), States of Knowledge – The Co-Production of Science and Social Order, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 87–108.Google Scholar

Zadeh, Lotfi A. 1965. ‘Fuzzy sets’, Information and Control 8(3): 338–53, Academic Press Inc. (cited from Jeroen C. J. M. van den Bergh (ed.), 1999, Handbook of Environmental and Resource Economics, Ashgate: Edward Elgar Publishing).CrossRef Google Scholar