Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of maps, tables and figures
- Acknowledgements
- List of abbreviations
- Roman Asia Minor
- Introduction
- 1 Introducing euergetism: questions, definitions and data
- 2 The size and nature of gifts
- 3 The icing on the cake?
- 4 The concentration of wealth and power
- 5 The politics of public generosity
- 6 Giving for a return: generosity and legitimation
- Epilogue: The decline of civic munificence
- Appendix 1 List of source references for the benefactions assembled in the database
- Appendix 2 Capital sums for foundations in the Roman east (c. i–iii ad)
- Appendix 3 Public buildings, distributions, and games and festivals per century (N = 399)
- Bibliography
- Index
5 - The politics of public generosity
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 July 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of maps, tables and figures
- Acknowledgements
- List of abbreviations
- Roman Asia Minor
- Introduction
- 1 Introducing euergetism: questions, definitions and data
- 2 The size and nature of gifts
- 3 The icing on the cake?
- 4 The concentration of wealth and power
- 5 The politics of public generosity
- 6 Giving for a return: generosity and legitimation
- Epilogue: The decline of civic munificence
- Appendix 1 List of source references for the benefactions assembled in the database
- Appendix 2 Capital sums for foundations in the Roman east (c. i–iii ad)
- Appendix 3 Public buildings, distributions, and games and festivals per century (N = 399)
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
Why did elite benefactors give what they gave? This will be the central question of the present chapter. In previous chapters we saw that euergetism was not driven primarily by economic or charitable impulses. But if this is true then what did drive it? I will argue that the strain put on the polis model of society by the growing accumulation of wealth and power in the hands of small coteries of rich families encouraged elite benefactors to emphasise the continuing importance of the citizen community. Public munificence thus constituted a celebration of citizenship and the civic ideal, but it also helped to modify that ideal by allowing benefactors, whether deliberately or unconsciously, to move the focus away from the Classical notion of political egalitarianism towards a glorification of hierarchy within the citizen community. This latter aspect can be seen particularly clearly when we study the festivals and public handouts organised by members of the elite. In this way, euergetism served to re-emphasise the age-old collectivist ideal of the polis as a community of citizens in the face of the threats posed by contemporary economic and socio-political developments (for which see the previous chapter), while at the same time providing legitimation for the increasingly hierarchical and oligarchic nature of Greek civic society under the Empire.
BENEFACTIONS: THE CIVIC IDEAL AND CIVIC HIERARCHY
The old polis ideal, which defined the city essentially as a community of people, of citizens, had remained central to Greek civic ideology during the Roman imperial period.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Politics of Munificence in the Roman EmpireCitizens, Elites and Benefactors in Asia Minor, pp. 71 - 112Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2009
- 1
- Cited by