Perverse consequences? The impact of quotas for women on democratization in Africa

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511813146.010

8 - Perverse consequences? The impact of quotas for women on democratization in Africa

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012

Shireen Hassim

Edited by

Ian Shapiro ,

Susan C. Stokes ,

Elisabeth Jean Wood and

Alexander S. Kirshner

Show author details

Shireen Hassim: Affiliation:
University of the Witwatersrand
Ian Shapiro: Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Susan C. Stokes: Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Elisabeth Jean Wood: Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Alexander S. Kirshner: Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Introduction

The emergence of a global political movement agitating for the adoption of gender quotas – what Drude Dahlerup (2005) has described as a “quota fever” – has reinvigorated feminist theorization of representation. The fundamental questions of representation have been posed again: who do elected officials represent; does increased representation improve marginalized groups' access to decision-making institutions; and under what conditions does increased representation lead to improved policy outcomes for marginal groups? Two sorts of disillusionment have coincided in global political discussions about women and representation. On the one hand, feminists in older democracies despair about the slow progress of women in elected bodies. On the other, in new democracies, feminists are skeptical of the willingness of pro-democracy movements to effectively address the interests of women. A remarkable consensus has been forged between these two groups in favor of new mechanisms to increase women's representation, most notably the use of some form of gender quota.

Debates on quotas have advanced in two distinctive phases thus far. In the first phase, feminists were concerned with justifying the idea that special mechanisms were needed to redress the democratic deficit in representation. Most opponents of quotas do indeed focus on normative liberal objections, whether these relate to the relative privileges of groups over individuals, or the value of equal opportunities, or the relative weight of women's claims over those of other groups.

Type: Chapter
Information: Political Representation , pp. 211 - 235

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813146.010 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ahikire, Josephine. 2003. “Gender Equity and Local Democracy in Contemporary Uganda: Addressing the Challenge of Women's Political Effectiveness in Local Government,” in No Shortcuts to Power: African Women in Politics and Policymaking, ed. Goetz, Anne Marie and Hassim, Shireen. London: Zed Books, 213–39.Google Scholar

Baldez, Lisa. 2006. “The Pros and Cons of Gender Quota Laws: What Happens when you Kick Men Out and Let Women In?” Politics and Gender 2 (1): 102–9.Google Scholar

Ballington, Julie (ed.). 2004. The Implementation of Quotas: African Experiences. Stockholm: International IDEA.

Ballington, Julie 2005. “Introduction,” in International IDEA Handbook: Women in Parliament: Beyond Numbers, ed. Ballington, Julie and Karam, Azza. Stockholm: International IDEA, 23–30.Google Scholar

Banaszak, Lee Ann, Beckwith, Karen, and Rucht, Dieter (eds.). 2003. Women's Movements Facing the Reconfigured State. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Bauer, Gretchen and Britton, Hannah (eds.). 2006. Women in African Parliaments. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.

Beaman, Lori, Duflo, Esther, Pande, Rohini, and Topolova, Petia. 2007. Women Politicians, Gender Bias and Policy-Making in Rural India. State of the World's Children 2007 Background Paper, UNICEF.

Brubaker, Rogers. 2005. “Ethnicity Without Groups,” in Remaking Modernity: Politics, History, and Sociology, ed. Adams, Julia, Clemens, Elisabeth S., and Orloff, Ann Shola. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 470–92.Google Scholar

Creevey, Lucy. 2006. “Senegal: Contending with Religious Constraints,” in Women in African Parliaments, ed. Bauer, Gretchen and Britton, Hannah E.. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 215–45.Google Scholar

Dahlerup, Drude. 1988. “From a Small to a Large Minority: Women in Scandinavian Politics.” Scandinavian Political Studies 11 (4): 275–98.CrossRef Google Scholar

Dahlerup, Drude. 2005. “Increasing Women's Political Representation: New Trends in Gender Quotas,” in International IDEA Handbook: Women in Parliament: Beyond Numbers, ed. Ballington, Julie and Karam, Azza. Stockholm: International IDEA, 141–53.Google Scholar

Dahlerup, Drude. 2006. “The Story of the Theory of Critical Mass.” Politics and Gender 2 (4): 511–22.Google Scholar

Dahlerup, Drude and Lenita, Friedenvall. 2005. “Quotas as a Fast-Track to Equal Representation for Women.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 7 (1): 26–48.CrossRef Google Scholar

Goetz, Anne Marie and Hassim, Shireen (eds.). 2003. No Shortcuts to Power: African Women in Politics and Policy Making. New York: Zed Books.

Hassim, Shireen. 2006a. “Women, Parliaments and Gender Equality in Africa: Exploring the Virtuous Circle of Representation,” in Women in African Parliaments, ed. Bauer, Gretchen and Britton, Hannah. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 246–66.Google Scholar

Hassim, Shireen. 2006b. Women's Organizations and Democracy in South Africa: Contesting Authority. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar

Htun, Mala. 2005. “Women, Political Parties and Electoral Systems in Latin America,” in International IDEA Handbook: Women in Parliament: Beyond Numbers, ed. Ballington, Julie and Karam, Azza. Stockholm: International IDEA, 112–21.Google Scholar

,Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU). 2005. “Women in National Parliaments: Situation as of 31 January 2005.” Available at: www.ipu.org (accessed September 3, 2006).

Krook, Mona Lena. 2006. “Gender Quotas, Norms and Politics.” Politics and Gender 2 (1): 110–18.Google Scholar

Lacey, Marc. 2005. “Women's Voices Rise as Rwanda Reinvents Itself.” New York Times, February 26, 2005.

Longman, Timothy. 2006. “Rwanda: Achieving Equality or Serving an Authoritarian State?” in Women in African Parliaments, ed. Bauer, Gretchen and Britton, Hannah E.. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 210–33.Google Scholar

Mansbridge, Jane. 2005. “Quota Problems: Combating the Dangers of Essentialism.” Politics and Gender 1 (4): 622–37.Google Scholar

Matland, Richard E. 1998. “Women's Representation in National Legislatures: Developed and Developing Countries.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 23 (1): 109–25.CrossRef Google Scholar

Matland, Richard E. and Studlar, Donley T.. 1996. “The Contagion of Women Candidates in Single-Member District and Proportional Representation Systems: Canada and Norway.” Journal of Politics 58: 707–33.CrossRef Google Scholar

Nanivadekar, Medha. 2006. “Are Quotas a Good Idea? The Indian Experience with Reserved Seats for Women.” Politics and Gender 2 (1): 119–28.Google Scholar

Newbury, Catharine and Newbury, David. 1999. “A Catholic Mass in Kigali: Contested Views of the Genocide and Ethnicity in Rwanda.” Canadian Journal of African Studies / Revue Canadienne des Études Africaines 33 (2/3): 292–328. Special issue on French-Speaking Central Africa: Political Dynamics of Identities and Representations.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Norris, Pippa and Lovenduski, Joni (eds.). 1996. Women in Party Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Phillips, Anne. 1995. The Politics of Presence. London: Polity Press.Google Scholar

Sawer, Marian. 2002. “Representation of Women: Meaning and Make-Believe,” in Women, Politics and Change, ed. Ross, Karen. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 5–17.Google Scholar

Summers, Anne. 1986. “Mandarins or Missionaries: Women in the Federal Bureaucracy,” in Australian Women: New Feminist Perspectives, ed. Grieve, Norma and Burns, Alisa. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Tamale, Sylvia. 1999. When Hens Begin to Crow. Kampala: Fountain Publishers.Google Scholar

Tamale, Sylvia. 2003. “Introducing Quotas in Africa: Discourse and Legal Reform in Uganda.” Paper presented at International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (IDEA) / Electoral Institute of Southern Africa (EISA) / Southern African Development Community (SADC) Parliamentary Forum Conference, Pretoria, South Africa, November 11–13, 2003.

Tripp, Aili Mari. 2000. Women and Politics in Uganda. Kampala: Fountain Publishers.Google Scholar

Tripp, Aili Mari. 2006. “Uganda: Agents of Change for Women's Advancement?” in Women in African Parliaments, ed. Bauer, Gretchen and Britton, Hannah E.. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 158–89.Google Scholar

Waylen, Georgina. 2007. Engendering Transitions: Mobilization, Institutions and Gender Outcomes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar