The impact of electoral debate on public opinions: an experimental investigation of the 2005 New York City mayoral election

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511813146.014

12 - The impact of electoral debate on public opinions: an experimental investigation of the 2005 New York City mayoral election

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012

Sendhil Mullainathan ,

Ebonya Washington and

Julia R. Azari

Edited by

Ian Shapiro ,

Susan C. Stokes ,

Elisabeth Jean Wood and

Alexander S. Kirshner

Show author details

Sendhil Mullainathan: Affiliation:
Harvard University
Ebonya Washington: Affiliation:
Yale University
Julia R. Azari: Affiliation:
Marquette University
Ian Shapiro: Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Susan C. Stokes: Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Elisabeth Jean Wood: Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Alexander S. Kirshner: Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Introduction

Political debates have long been a part of the American polity. The early practice was aimed primarily at promoting parliamentary and elite deliberation, as well as informing the broader public about issues and candidates (Jamieson and Birdsell 1988: 37). Televised debates have altered this dynamic, structuring debate as a practice to educate the electorate. Yet the impact of televised debates on the quality of democracy has been somewhat controversial, with proponents casting debates as opportunities “to provide sustained analysis of issues and close comparison of candidates” (ibid.: 5), and others expressing the concern that the televised debates would increase the emphasis on image rather than substance (Druckman 2003).

Whether debates influence opinions by showcasing candidate viewpoints or by simply presenting shallow cues of candidate image, conventional wisdom assumes that televised debates will somehow influence viewers' opinions regarding the candidates. Information in the electoral process is presumed to help voters make decisions more in line with their preferences (Lupia and McCubbins 1998). In light of the emphasis on the informative potential of debates, it is natural to pose the question of whether debates truly provide citizens with information that influences their opinions or choices.

To this end, there is a large literature examining the impact of debates on citizens' political opinions and voting behavior. This research has concluded that debates are able to alter viewers' opinions of candidates, but only in a small way.

Type: Chapter
Information: Political Representation , pp. 324 - 341

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511813146.014 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Andersen, Kurt. 2004. “People Like Us.” New York 37 (November 22): 24–6.Google Scholar

,Anon. 2005. “The Shunned Debate.” New York Times, October 9, p. CY11.Google Scholar

Carpini, Delli, Michael, X. and Keeter, Scott. 1996. What Americans Know About Politics and Why it Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Druckman, James N. 2003. “The Power of Television Images: The First Kennedy–Nixon Debate Revisited.” Journal of Politics 65 (May): 559–71.CrossRef Google Scholar

Gales, Kathleen and Kendall, M. G.. 1957. “An Inquiry Concerning Interviewer Variability.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, ser. A. (General) 120 (2): 121–47.CrossRef Google Scholar

Gerber, Alan, and Donald, Green. 1999. “Misperceptions about Perceptual Bias.” Annual Review of Political Science 2 (June): 189–210.CrossRef Google Scholar

Gerber, Alan, and Donald, Green. 2000. “The Effects of Canvassing, Telephone Calls, and Direct Mail on Voter Turnout: A Field Experiment.” American Political Science Review 94 (September): 653–63.CrossRef Google Scholar

Gray, Percy G. 1956. “Examples of Interviewer Variability Taken from Two Sample Surveys.” Applied Statistics 5 (June): 73–85.CrossRef Google Scholar

Haberman, Clyde. 2005. “Watch Debate? Sleep In? Boxers? Briefs?” New York Times, October 28, p. B1.Google Scholar

Hamilton, Alexander, Madison, James, and Jay, John. 1982. The Federalist Papers. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar

Hanson, Robert H. and Marks, Eli S.. 1958. “Influence of the Interviewer on the Accuracy of Survey Results.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 53 (September): 635–55.CrossRef Google Scholar

Healy, Patrick. 2005a. “Weiner Concedes Race for Mayor to Avert Runoff; Says Ferrer is Nominee.” New York Times, September 15, p. A1.Google Scholar

Healy, Patrick. 2005b. “Ferrer Makes His Candidacy Look Stronger Than the Polls Suggest.” New York Times, October 31, p. B4.Google Scholar

Healy, Patrick. 2005c. “Attacks Escalate in Final Debate of Mayor's Race; Rivals Go on Offensive.” New York Times, November 2, p. A1.Google Scholar

Healy, Patrick. 2005d. “Bloomberg Cruises to Re-Election Victory; Corzine is Winner in Costly New Jersey Race.” New York Times, November 9, p. A1.Google Scholar

Healy, Patrick, and Connelly, Marjorie. 2005. “Even Among Democratic Voters, Poll Finds Ferrer is Well Behind.” New York Times, October 28, p. A1.Google Scholar

Healy, Patrick, and Lueck, Thomas. 2005. “Ferrer Levels Attack on Bloomberg Over Iraq War and the Need for Low-Cost Housing.” New York Times, October 27, p. B3.Google Scholar

Hellweg, Susan A., Pfau, Michael, and Brydon, Steven R.. 1992. Televised Presidential Debates: Advocacy in Contemporary America. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar

Holbrook, Thomas M. 1996. Do Campaigns Matter?Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Jamieson, Kathleen Hall, and Birdsell, David S.. 1988. Presidential Debates: The Challenge of Creating an Informed Electorate. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kraus, Sidney. 2000. Televised Presidential Debates and Public Policy. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Lupia, Arthur and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1998. The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Really Need to Know?New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Madison, James, Hamilton, Alexander, and Jay, John. 1982. The Federalist Papers. New York: Bantam, 1982.Google Scholar

Morone, James A. 1998. The Democratic Wish: Popular Participation and the Limits of American Government. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Purnick, Joyce. 2005. “So Far, a Race Without Chutzpah.” New York Times, October 20, p. B1.Google Scholar

Rutenberg, Jim. 2005. “In Equal Footing of a Debate, Ferrer Gets Feisty.” New York Times, October 31, p. A1.Google Scholar

Wood, Gordon S. 1998. The Creation of the American Republic, 1776–1787. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar

Zaller, John R. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef Google Scholar