Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T00:55:12.276Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part III - Autocracies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2023

Edited by
B. Guy Peters ,
Colin Knox  and
Byeong Seob Kim
B. Guy Peters
Affiliation:
University of Pittsburgh
Colin Knox
Affiliation:
Nazarbayev University, Kazakhstan
Byeong Seob Kim
Affiliation:
Seoul National University
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Political Patronage in Asian Bureaucracies , pp. 229 - 329
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Andreas, J. (2009). Rise of the Red Engineers: The Cultural Revolution and the Origins of China’s New Class. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Armstrong, J. D. (1977). Revolutionary Diplomacy: Chinese Foreign Policy and the United Front Doctrine. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Burns, J. P. (1987). China’s Nomenklatura System. Problems of Communism, 36(5), 36–51.Google Scholar
Burns, J. P. (2000). Public Sector Reform and the State: The Case of China. Public Administration Quarterly, 24(4), 419–436.Google Scholar
Chen, Y., Li, H., & Zhou, L. (2005). Relative Performance Evaluation and the Turnover of Provincial Leaders in China. Economic Letters, 88(3), 421–425.Google Scholar
Edin, M. (2003). State Capacity and Local Agent Control in China: CCP Cadre Management from a Township Perspective. The China Quarterly, 173, 35–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gries, P. H., & Rosen, S. (2004). State and Society in 21st Century China: Crisis, Contention, and Legitimation. Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Guo, S. (2012). Chinese Politics and Government: Power, Ideology and Organization. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, B., & Warren, M. E. (2011). Authoritarian Deliberation: The Deliberative Turn in Chinese Political Development. Perspectives on Politics, 9(2), 269–289.Google Scholar
Heikkila, T., Weible, C. M., & Gerlak, A. K. (2020). When Does Science Persuade (or Not Persuade) in High-Conflict Policy Contexts? Public Administration, 98(3), 535–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, J. (2018). Making Bureaucracy Work: Patronage Networks, Performance Incentives, and Economic Development in China. American Journal of Political Science, 62(4), 982–999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landry, P. F., Lü, X., & Duan, H. (2018). Does Performance Matter? Evaluating Political Selection along the Chinese Administrative Ladder. Comparative Political Studies, 51(8), 1074–1105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, B., & Walder, A. G. (2001). Career Advancement as Party Patronage: Sponsored Mobility into the Chinese Administrative Elite, 1949–1996. American Journal of Sociology, 106(5), 1371–1408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, D. D. (1998). Changing Incentives of the Chinese Bureaucracy. The American Economic Review, 88(2), 393–397.Google Scholar
Li, H., & Zhou, L. (2005). Political Turnover and Economic Performance: The Incentive Role of Personnel Control in China. Journal of Public Economics, 89(9–10), 1743–1762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieberthal, K. (2004). Governing China: From Revolution to Reform (2nd ed.). W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Lieberthal, K., & Oksenberg, M. (1990). Policy Making in China: Leaders, Structures, and Processes. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
MacFarquhar, R., & Schoenhals, M. (2006). Mao’s Last Revolution. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maskin, E., Qian, Y., & Xu, C. (2000). Incentives, Information, and Organizational Form. The Review of Economic Studies, 67(2), 359–378.Google Scholar
Nathan, A. J. (1973). A Factionalism Model for CCP Politics. The China Quarterly, 53, 34–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qiao, L. (2012). Performance, preference, promotion: political mobility of Chinese regional leaders [Doctoral Dissertation, Louisiana State University]. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/1563/Google Scholar
Saich, T. (2015). Governance and Politics of China (4th ed.). Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saich, T. (2021). From Rebel to Ruler: One Hundred Years of the Chinese Communist Party. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Shih, V. C. (2016). Efforts at Exterminating Factionalism under Xi Jinping: Will Xi Jinping Dominate Chinese Politics after the 19th Party Congress? In Sebastian, H. & Matthias, S. (Eds.), China’s Core Executive: Leadership Styles, Structures and Processes under Xi Jinping (pp. 18–22). Mercator Institute for China Studies.Google Scholar
Shih, V. C., Shan, W., & Liu, M. (2010). Gauging the Elite Political Equilibrium in the CCP: A Quantitative Approach Using Biographical Data. The China Quarterly, 201, 79–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shih, V. C., Adolph, C., & Liu, M. (2012). Getting Ahead in the Communist Party: Explaining the Advancement of Central Committee Members. American Political Science Review, 106(1), 166–187.Google Scholar
Shirk, S. L. (2018). China in Xi’s “New Era”: The Return to Personalistic Rule. Journal of Democracy, 29(2), 22–36.Google Scholar
Sun, Y. (2018). Debating Ethnic Governance in China. Journal of Contemporary China, 28(115), 118–132.Google Scholar
Tao, R., Su, F., Lu, X., & Zhu, Y. (2010). Jingji zengzhang nenggou dailai pushengma? (Can Economic Performance Bring about Promotion?). Guanli shijie (Management World), (12), 13–27.Google Scholar
Tsou, T. (1995). Chinese Politics at the Top: Factionalism or Informal Politics? Balance-of-Power Politics or a Game to Win All? The China Journal, (34), 95–156.Google Scholar
Wang, R., & Groot, G. (2018). Who Represents? Xi Jinping’s Grand United Front Work, Legitimation, Participation and Consultative Democracy. Journal of Contemporary China, 27(112), 569–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiting, S. H. (2004). The Cadre Evaluation System at the Grassroots: The Paradox of Party Rule. In Naughton, B. & Yang, D. (Eds.), Holding China Together (pp. 101–119). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zang, X. (2015). Ethnicity in China: A Critical Introduction. Polity Press.Google Scholar
Zhu, J. (2008). Why Are Offices for Sale in China? A Case Study of the Office-Selling Chain in Heilongjiang Province. Asian Survey, 48(4), 558–579.Google Scholar

References

Arriola, L. (2009). Patronage and Political Stability in Africa. Comparative Political Studies, 42 (10): 1339–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Askim, J., Karlsen, R., and Kolltveit, K. (2016). Political Appointees in Executive Government: Exploring and Explaining Roles Using a Large-N Survey in Norway. Public Administration, 95 (2): 342–58.Google Scholar
Bertelsmann Transformation Index (2020). Available at: www.bti-project.org/en/home.html?&cb=00000Google Scholar
Bertelsmann Transformation Index (2018). Kazakhstan Country Report, available at: www.bti-project.org/en/reports/country-reports/detail/itc/KAZ/Google Scholar
Bertelsmann Transformation Index (2020). Kyrgyzstan Country Report, available at: www.bti-project.org/content/en/downloads/reports/country_report_2020_KGZ.pdfGoogle Scholar
Bertelsmann Transformation Index (2020). Tajikistan Country Report, available at: www.bti-project.org/en/reports/country-report-TJK-2020.htmlGoogle Scholar
Bratton, M., and Van de Walle, N. (1997). Democratic Experiments in Africa: Regime Transitions in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, C. and Peters, B. G. (1988). The Politics/Administration Dichotomy: Death or Merely Change? Governance, 1 (1): 79–99.Google Scholar
Clapham, C. (1985). Third World Politics: An Introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Connaughton, B. (2015). Navigating the Borderlines of Politics and Administration: Reflections on the Role of Ministerial Advisers. International Journal of Public Administration, 38 (1): 37–45.Google Scholar
Coppedge, M. et al (2020). V-Dem Country- Year Dataset v10. Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project. www.v-dem.net/en/data/data/Google Scholar
Cruz, C. and Keefer, P. (2015). Political Parties, Clientelism and Bureaucratic Reform. Comparative Political Studies, 48 (14): 1942–73.Google Scholar
Dettman, S. and Gomez, E. T. (2020). Political Financing Reform: Politics, Policies and Patronage in Malaysia, Journal of Contemporary Asia, 50 (1): 36–55.Google Scholar
Driscoll, B. (2017). Why Political Competition Can Increase Patronage. Studies in Comparative International Development, 53 (4): 1–24.Google Scholar
Eckstein, H. (2000). Case Study and Theory in Political Science. Case Study Method, pp. 238–258 in Gomm, R., Hammersley, M. and Foster, P. (eds). Case Study Method: Key Issues, Key Texts. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Freedom House (2020). Nations in Transition Report Kazakhstan Country Profile available at. https://freedomhouse.org/country/kazakhstan/nations-transit/2020Google Scholar
Janenova, S. (2019). The Boundaries of Research in an Authoritarian State. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 18: 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919876469Google Scholar
Janenova, S. and Knox, C. (2019). Civil Service Reform in Kazakhstan: Trajectory to the 30 Most Developed Countries? International Review of Administrative Sciences, 85 (3): 419–439.Google Scholar
Janenova, S. and Knox, C. (2020). Depicting Public Servants in Authoritarian Regimes in Sullivan, H. , H. Dickenson, (eds). The Palgrave Handbook of the Public Servant. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Junisbai, B. Junisbai, A. and Whitsel, C. (2017). What Makes “Ardent Democrats” in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan? PONARS Eurasia Policy Memo No. 489 October 2017.Google Scholar
Junisbai, B. and Junisbai, A. (2019). Are Youth Different? The Nazarbayev Generation and Public Opinion pp. 25–48 in Laruelle, M. (ed.) Nazarbayev Generation. Studies on Youth in Kazakhstan. Lexington: Rowman & Littlefield (September 2019).Google Scholar
Kaufmann, D. and Kraay, A. (2020). Worldwide Governance Indicators accessible at: https://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/Google Scholar
Knox, C. (2019). Public Sector Reform in Central Asia and the Caucasus. International Journal of Public Administration, 42 (2): 168–78.Google Scholar
Kopecký, P., Scherlis, G., and Spirova, M. (2008). Conceptualising and Measuring Party Patronage. Leiden University: Committee on Concepts and Methods Working Paper, Series 25.Google Scholar
Kopecký, P., Peter, M., and María, S. (2012). Party Patronage and Party Government in European Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kopecký, P., Scherlis, G., and Spirova, M. (2008). Conceptualizing and Measuring Party Patronage. Leiden University: Committee on Concepts and Methods Working Paper, Series 25.Google Scholar
Kopecký, P., Meyer-Sahling, J., Panizza, F., Scherlis, G., Schuster, C., and Spirova, M. (2016). Party Patronage in Contemporary Democracies: Results from an Expert Survey in Twenty Two Countries from Five Regions. European Journal of Political Research, 55 (2): 416–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D. and Hossain, A. (2019). Local Political Consolidation in Bangladesh: Power, Informality and Patronage. Development and Change. DOI: 10.1111/dech.12534.Google Scholar
Mallinson, K. (2019). Governance in ‘Kazakhstan: Tested by Transition.’ pp. 10–22 in Bohr, A., Brauer, B., Gould-Davies, N., Kassenova, N., Lillis, J., Mallison, K., Nixey, J. and Satpayev, D. (eds). London: Chatham House.Google Scholar
Maxwell, L., Marquardt, K. L., and Anna Lührmann, A. (2019). V-Dem Methodology: Aggregating Expert Assessments. Accessible at: www.v-dem.net/media/filer_public/99/de/99dedd73-f8bc-484c-8b91-44ba601b6e6b/v-dem_democracy_report_2019.pdfGoogle Scholar
Muñoz, P. and Baraybar, V. (2018). Patronage without parties? Paper submitted to the workshop Patronage in Transition: The Politics of Patronage in Latin America, Escola Nacional de Administração Pública, Brasilia, 5–6 March.Google Scholar
Muñoz, P. and Dargent, E. (2016). Patronage, subnational linkages and Party-Building: the Cases of Colombia and Peru, in S. Levitsky, B. Van Dyck, and I. Domínguez, Challenges of Party-Building in Latin America.Google Scholar
Panizza, F., Larraburu, C. R. R., and Scherlis, G. (2018). Unpacking Patronage: The Politics of Patronage Appointments in Argentina’s and Uruguay’s Central Public Administrations. Journal of Politics in Latin America, 10 (3): 59–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panizza, F., Guy Peters, B., and Ramos Larrburu, C. (2019). Roles, Trust and Skills: A Typology of Patronage Appointments. Public Administration, 97 (1): 147–61.Google Scholar
Peters, B. G. and Pierre, J. (eds) (2004). Politicization of the Civil Service in Comparative Perspective: The Quest for Control. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Peters, B. G. (2021). Patronage in Asian Political Systems: A Framework for Research.Google Scholar
Scherlis, G. (2013). The Contours of Party Patronage in Argentina. Latin American Research Review, 48 (3): 63–68.Google Scholar
Sigman, R. and Lindberg, S. (2017). Neopatrimonialism and Democracy: An Empirical Investigation of Africa’s Political Regimes. University of Gothenburg, Varieties of Democracy Institute: Working Paper No. 56. November 2017.Google Scholar
Transparency International Kazakhstan (2019). Monitoring Corruption in Kazakhstan accessible at: http://tikazakhstan.org/monitoring-corruption-in-kazakhstan/Google Scholar
Varieties of Democracy (2020). University of Gothenburg, accessible at: www.v-dem.net/en/Google Scholar
Verver, M. and Dahles, H. (2015). The Institutionalisation of Oknha: Cambodian Entrepreneurship at the Interface of Business and Politics, Journal of Contemporary Asia, 45(1): 48–70.Google Scholar
World Bank (2020). Kazakhstan Overview accessible at: www.worldbank.org/en/country/kazakhstan/overviewGoogle Scholar

References

Chang, Y. (2021), Constructing Vietnam, Constructing China, Journal of Vietnamese Studies, 16(1): 90–131.Google Scholar
Gainsborough, M. (2017), The Myth of a Centralised Socialist State in Vietnam: What Kind of a Myth? Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 3(2017): 119–143.Google Scholar
Jiang, J. and Zhang, M. (2020), Friends with Benefits: Patronage Networks and Distributive Politics in China, Journal of Public Economics, 184(2020): 104143.Google Scholar
Kerkvliet, B., Chan, A. and Unger, J. (1998), Comparing the Chinese and Vietnamese Reforms: An Introduction, The China Journal, 40 Special Issue: Transforming Asian Socialism. China and Vietnam Compared (July, 1998): 1–7.Google Scholar
London, J. D. (2014), Politics in Contemporary Vietnam, doi:10.1057/9781137347534Google Scholar
Nguyen, V. T. (2016), Nothing Ever Dies: Vietnam and the Memory of War. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Noland, M. (2005), North Korea in Transition, Korean Journal of Defense Analysis, 17(1): 7–32.Google Scholar
Panizza, F., Peters, B. G. and Ramos Larraburu, C. (2019), Roles, Trusts and Skills: A Typology of Patronage Appointments, Public Administration, 97: 147–161.Google Scholar
Phan, L. H. N. (2017, August), Challenges/constraints in teaching today’s English in Vietnam: Teachers’ voices. In SEAMEO International TESOL Conference, Ho Chi Minh City.Google Scholar
Thayer, C. A., (2009), Vietnam and the Challenge of Political Civil Society, Contemporary Southeast Asia, 31(1): 1–27.Google Scholar
Lươ ng Đức Thiệp (2017), Xã hội Việt Nam từ sơ suˀ̛ đến cận đại, NXB. Tri thức, Hà Nội, tr. 91, 149–150.Google Scholar
Ngô Đức Thịnh (2010), Nhũ ̛ng giá trị văn hóa truyè̂n thống Việt Nam, NXB. Chính trị Quốc gia, Hà Nội, tr. 300–301, 312–313.Google Scholar
Trần Quốc Vượng (2016), Văn hóa Việt Nam: Tìm tòi và Suy ngẫm, NXB. Văn học, Hà Nội.Google Scholar
Vũ Đình Hòe (1997), Hối ký Thanh Nghị, NXB Hà Nội, Hà Nội, tr. 318.Google Scholar
Lươ ng Đức Thiệp (2017), Xã hội Việt Nam từ sơ suˀ̛ đến cận đại, NXB. Tri thức, Hà Nội, tr. 91, 149–150.Google Scholar
Ngô Đức Thịnh (2010), Nhũ ̛ng giá trị văn hóa truyè̂n thống Việt Nam, NXB. Chính trị Quốc gia, Hà Nội, tr. 300–301, 312–313.Google Scholar
Trần Quốc Vượng (2016), Văn hóa Việt Nam: Tìm tòi và Suy ngẫm, NXB. Văn học, Hà Nội.Google Scholar
Vũ Đình Hòe (1997), Hối ký Thanh Nghị, NXB Hà Nội, Hà Nội, tr. 318.Google Scholar

Literature Exclusively in Vietnamese Language [Tài liệu Tiếng Việt]

Lươ ng Đức Thiệp (2017), Xã hội Việt Nam từ sơ suˀ̛ đến cận đại, NXB. Tri thức, Hà Nội, tr. 91, 149–150.Google Scholar
Ngô Đức Thịnh (2010), Nhũ ̛ng giá trị văn hóa truyè̂n thống Việt Nam, NXB. Chính trị Quốc gia, Hà Nội, tr. 300–301, 312–313.Google Scholar
Trần Quốc Vượng (2016), Văn hóa Việt Nam: Tìm tòi và Suy ngẫm, NXB. Văn học, Hà Nội.Google Scholar
Vũ Đình Hòe (1997), Hối ký Thanh Nghị, NXB Hà Nội, Hà Nội, tr. 318.Google Scholar

References

Armstrong, T. J., 2016. Oswald Brierly and the Art of Patronage: A Colonial Journey.Google Scholar
Cooper, C. A. 2020. At the Pleasure of the Crown: The Politics of Bureaucratic Appointments. UBC Press.Google Scholar
Kopecký, P., Mair, P. and Spirova, M. eds., 2012. Party Patronage and Party Government in European Democracies. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kopecký, P. and Scherlis, G., 2008. Party Patronage in Contemporary Europe. European Review, 16(3), pp. 355–371.Google Scholar
Muñoz, P., 2021. Latin America Erupts: Peru Goes Populist. Journal of Democracy, 32(3), pp. 48–62.Google Scholar
Panizza, F., Peters, B. G. and Ramos Larraburu, C. R., 2019. Roles, Trust and Skills: A Typology of Patronage Appointments. Public Administration, 97(1), pp. 147–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Panizza, F., Peters, B. G. and Larraburu, C. R. eds., 2022. The Politics of Patronage Appointments in Latin American Central Administrations. University of Pittsburg Press.Google Scholar
Peters, B. G., and Pierre, J. 2004. Politicization of the Civil Service: Concepts, Causes, Consequences. In The Politicization of the Civil Service in Comparative Perspective (pp. 13–25). Routledge.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Autocracies
  • Edited by B. Guy Peters, University of Pittsburgh, Colin Knox, Nazarbayev University, Kazakhstan, Byeong Seob Kim, Seoul National University
  • Book: Political Patronage in Asian Bureaucracies
  • Online publication: 05 October 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009208055.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Autocracies
  • Edited by B. Guy Peters, University of Pittsburgh, Colin Knox, Nazarbayev University, Kazakhstan, Byeong Seob Kim, Seoul National University
  • Book: Political Patronage in Asian Bureaucracies
  • Online publication: 05 October 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009208055.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Autocracies
  • Edited by B. Guy Peters, University of Pittsburgh, Colin Knox, Nazarbayev University, Kazakhstan, Byeong Seob Kim, Seoul National University
  • Book: Political Patronage in Asian Bureaucracies
  • Online publication: 05 October 2023
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009208055.012
Available formats
×