Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- 1 ‘To be Deborah’: the political implications of providentialism under a female ruler
- 2 Announcing the godly common weal: Knox, Aylmer and the parameters of counsel
- 3 Feats of incorporation: the ideological bases of the mixed monarchy
- 4 Contesting the social order: ‘resistance theory’ and the mixed monarchy
- 5 Godly men and nobles: the bicephalic body politic
- 6 Godly men and parliamentarians: the politics of counsel in the 1570s
- 7 Rewriting the common weal: Sir Thomas Smith and the De Republica Anglorum
- Afterword
- Bibliography
- Index
- IDEAS IN CONTEXT
7 - Rewriting the common weal: Sir Thomas Smith and the De Republica Anglorum
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 August 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- 1 ‘To be Deborah’: the political implications of providentialism under a female ruler
- 2 Announcing the godly common weal: Knox, Aylmer and the parameters of counsel
- 3 Feats of incorporation: the ideological bases of the mixed monarchy
- 4 Contesting the social order: ‘resistance theory’ and the mixed monarchy
- 5 Godly men and nobles: the bicephalic body politic
- 6 Godly men and parliamentarians: the politics of counsel in the 1570s
- 7 Rewriting the common weal: Sir Thomas Smith and the De Republica Anglorum
- Afterword
- Bibliography
- Index
- IDEAS IN CONTEXT
Summary
And consequently there may appear like diversity to be in English between a public weal and a common weal, as should be in Latin between Res publica and Res plebeia. And after that signification, if there should be a common weal either the commoners only must be wealthy, and the gentle and noble men needy and miserable, or else, excluding gentility, all men must be of one degree and sort, and a new name provided.
Sir Thomas Elyot, The Boke Named the GovernourIn his 1990 article ‘War and the Commonwealth in Mid- Tudor England’, Ben Lowe argues that the term ‘commonwealth’ took on ‘nuances of meaning’ over the course of the sixteenth century that did not exist at its beginning. The earlier form (‘common weal’ or ‘common wealth’) referred to organic, societal relationships among the estates, and their productive interconnection for the good of all. The mid-sixteenth-century compound form (‘commonwealth’) which increasingly replaced it referred to the state, or respublica, and to associations among its peoples, a development that allowed for the eventual emergence of classical republicanism in the seventeenth century. Clearly the terminological shift did not signal the supersession of the older, medieval conception of the ‘common’ (sometimes ‘public’) weal. Instead, attention to the ‘commonwealth’ on the part of humanists, first at Henry VIII's court, later at Edward VI's, represented a means by which to assimilate the core values associated with the ‘common weal’ to England's new identity as a godly empire.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Political Culture in the Reign of Elizabeth IQueen and Commonwealth 1558–1585, pp. 198 - 234Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1999