Poetry and Poetics in the Presocratic Philosophers Reading Xenophanes, Parmenides and Empedocles as Literature
Book contents
- Poetry and Poetics in the Presocratic Philosophers
- Poetry and Poetics in the Presocratic Philosophers
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Note on Fragment Numbers
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Xenophanes
- Chapter 2 Parmenides
- Chapter 3 Empedocles
- Conclusion
- Epilogue: The Legacy of Presocratic Poetics
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 April 2021
Book contents
- Poetry and Poetics in the Presocratic Philosophers
- Poetry and Poetics in the Presocratic Philosophers
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Acknowledgements
- Abbreviations
- Note on Fragment Numbers
- Introduction
- Chapter 1 Xenophanes
- Chapter 2 Parmenides
- Chapter 3 Empedocles
- Conclusion
- Epilogue: The Legacy of Presocratic Poetics
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Poetry and Poetics in the Presocratic PhilosophersReading Xenophanes, Parmenides and Empedocles as Literature, pp. 207 - 235Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2021
References
Allan, R. J., de Jong, I. J. F., and de Jonge, C. C. (2017). ‘From Enargeia to Immersion: The Ancient Roots of a Modern Concept’. Style 51: 34–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allan, W. (2006). ‘Divine Justice and Cosmic Order in Early Greek Epic’. JHS 126: 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aloni, A. (2009). ‘Elegy: Forms, Functions and Communication’. In Budelmann (ed.), 168–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aloni, A., and Iannucci, A. (2007). L’elegia greca e l’epigramma dalle origini al v secolo. Florence.Google Scholar
Annas, J. (1982). ‘Plato on the Triviality of Literature’. In Plato on Beauty, Wisdom, and the Arts, ed. Moravcsik, J. M. E and Temko, P.. Totowa, NJ: 1–28.Google Scholar
Arrighetti, G. (1983). ‘L’eredita dell’ epica in Parmenide’. In Festschrift für Robert Muth zum 65. Geburtstag, ed. Haendel, P. and Meid, W.. Innsbruck: 9–16.Google Scholar
Asheri, D., Lloyd, A., and Corcella, A. (2007). Commentary on Herodotus Books i–iv. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkins, J. W. H. (1934). Literary Criticism in Antiquity: Volume 1, Greek: A Sketch of Its Development. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Austin, N. (1972). ‘Name Magic in the Odyssey’. California Studies in Classical Antiquity 5: 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babut, D. (1974b). ‘Sur la “théologie” de Xénophane’. Revue philosophique de la France et de l’étranger 164: 401–40.Google Scholar
Bachvarova, M. R. (2009). ‘Hittite and Greek Perspectives on Travelling Poets, Texts and Festivals’. In Hunter and Rutherford (eds.), 23–45.Google Scholar
Bakker, E. J. (2005). Pointing at the Past: From Formula to Performance in Homeric Poetics. Washington, DC and Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Bakker, E. J. (2013). The Meaning of Meat and the Structure of the Odyssey. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakker, E. J. (2017a). ‘Trust and Fame: The Seal of Theognis’. In Bakker (ed.), 99–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakker, E. J. (ed.) (2017b). Authorship and Greek Song: Authority, Authenticity, and Performance. Leiden.Google Scholar
Barfield, R. (2011). The Ancient Quarrel between Philosophy and Poetry. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, E. T. E. (2015). ‘New Religious Movements’. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, ed. Wright, J. D., 2nd ed. Oxford: 805–8.Google Scholar
Barker, E. T. E. (2009). Entering the Agon: Dissent and Authority in Homer, Historiography, and Tragedy. Oxford.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (2011a). ‘The History of Philosophy’. In Method and Metaphysics: Essays in Ancient Philosophy I. Oxford: 17–22.Google Scholar
Barnes, J. (2011b). ‘Philosophy within Quotation Marks?’ In Method and Metaphysics: Essays in Ancient Philosophy I. Oxford: 23–42.Google Scholar
Barthes, R. (1974). S/Z. Translated by R. Miller. Oxford. Originally published as S/Z, Paris, 1973.Google Scholar
Becker, O. (1937). Das Bild des Weges und Verwandte Vorstellungen im frühgriechischen Denken. Berlin.Google Scholar
Bernabé, A. (1979). ‘Los filósofos presocráticos como autores literarios’. Emerita 47: 357–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernabé, A. (1987–2007). Poetarum epicorum Graecorum testimonia et fragmenta. 4 vols. Berlin.Google Scholar
Bernabé, A. (2014). ‘On the Rites Described and Commented Upon in the Derveni Papyrus, Columns i–vi’. In Papadopoulou and Muellner (eds.), 19–52.Google Scholar
Bernabé, A., and San Cristóbal, A. I. J. (2008). Instructions for the Netherworld: The Orphic Gold Tablets. Leiden.Google Scholar
Betegh, G. (2004). The Derveni Papyrus: Cosmology, Theology and Interpretation. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Betegh, G. (2013). ‘On the Physical Aspect of Heraclitus’ Psychology, with New Appendices’. In Doctrine and Doxography Studies on Heraclitus and Pythagoras, ed. Sider, D. and Obbink, D.. Berlin: 225–61.Google Scholar
Betegh, G. (2016). ‘Colocation’. In ΣΩΜΑ. Körperkonzepte und körperliche Existenz in der antiken Philosophie und Literatur, ed. Buchheim, T., Meissner, D. and Wachsmann, N.. Hamburg: 393–421.Google Scholar
Bierl, A. (2014). ‘“Riddles over Riddles”: “Mysterious” and “Symbolic” (Inter)Textual Strategies: The Problem of Language in the Derveni Papyrus’. In Papadopoulou and Muellner (eds.), 187–210.Google Scholar
Bing, P. (1981). ‘The Voice of Those Who Live in the Sea: Empedocles and Callimachus’. ZPE 41: 33–6.Google Scholar
Blumenberg, H. (1966). ‘Sprachsituation und immanente Poetik’. In Immanente Ästhetik, ästhetische Reflexion: Lyrik als Paradigma der Moderne, ed. Iser, W.. Munich: 145–55.Google Scholar
Boedeker, D., and Sider, D. (eds.) (2001). The New Simonides: Contexts of Praise and Desire. Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Böhme, R. (1986). Die verkannte Muse: Dichtersprache und geistige Tradition des Parmenides. Bern.Google Scholar
Bollack, J (2001). ‘Voir la haine’. Methodos 1. Available online at https://journals.openedition.org/methodos/169 (accessed 23 August 2019).Google Scholar
Bollack, J (2005). ‘Empedocles: Two Theologies, Two Projects’. In Pierris (ed.), 45–72.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. (1986). ‘Early Greek Elegy, Symposium and Public Festival’. JHS 106: 13–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowie, E. L. (1993). ‘Lies, Fiction and Slander in Early Greek Poetry’. In Lies and Fiction in the Ancient World, ed. Gill, C. and Wiseman, T. P.. Exeter: 1–37.Google Scholar
Bowie, E. L. (2016). ‘Cultic Contexts for Elegiac Performance’. In Iambus and Elegy: New Approaches, ed. Carey, C. and Swift, L. A.. Oxford: 15–32.Google Scholar
Boys-Stones, G. R. (2003). ‘The Stoics’ Two Types of Allegory’. In Boys-Stones (ed.), 189–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boys-Stones, G. R. (ed.) (2003). Metaphor, Allegory, and the Classical Tradition: Ancient Thought and Modern Revisions. Oxford.Google Scholar
Brancacci, A. (2007). ‘Democritus’ Mousika’. In Democritus: Science, the Arts, and the Care of the Soul, ed. Brancacci, A. and Morel, P.-M.. Leiden: 181–206.Google Scholar
Bredlow, L. A. (2011). ‘Aristotle, Theophrastus, and Parmenides’ Theory of Cognition (B 16)’. Apeiron 44: 219–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bremer, D. (1980). ‘Aristoteles, Empedokles und die Erkenntnisleistung der Metapher’. Poetica 12: 350–76.Google Scholar
Bremer, J.-M. (1998). ‘Giving and Thanksgiving in Greek Religion’. In Reciprocity in Ancient Greece, ed. Gill, C., Postlethwaite, N. and Seaford, R.. Oxford: 127–38.Google Scholar
Bremmer, J. (1987). ‘What Is a Greek Myth?’ In Interpretations of Greek Mythology, ed. Bremmer, J.. London: 1–9.Google Scholar
Brooks, C. (1947). The Well-Wrought Urn: Studies in the Structure of Poetry. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Budelmann, F. (ed.) (2009). The Cambridge Companion to Greek Lyric. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bugno, M. (ed.) (2005). Senofane: interpretazioni antiche e contesto culturale. Naples.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. (1960). ‘Platon oder Pythagoras? Zum Ursprung des Wortes “Philosophie.”’ Hermes 88: 159–77.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. (1969). ‘Das Proömium des Parmenides und die Katabasis des Pythagoras’. Phronesis 14: 1–29.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. (1979). Structure and History in Greek Mythology and Ritual. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. (1982). ‘Craft versus Sect: The Problem of Orphics and Pythagoreans’. In Jewish and Christian Self-Definition, Vol. 3: Self-Definition in the Greco-Roman World, ed. Meyer, B. and Sanders, E. P.. Philadelphia, PA: 1–22.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. (1983). Homo Necans: The Anthropology of Ancient Greek Sacrificial Ritual and Myth. Translated by P. Bing. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA. Originally published as Homo Necans: Interpretationen altgriechischer Opferriten und Mythen, Berlin, 1972.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. (1985). Greek Religion. Translated by J. Raffan. Oxford. Originally published as Griechische Religion der archaischen und klassischen Epoche, Stuttgart, 1977.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. (1987b). ‘The Making of Homer in the Sixth Century bc: Rhapsodes versus Stesichorus’. In Papers on the Amasis Painter and His World, ed. von Bothmer, D.. Malibu, CA: 43–62.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. (1992). The Orientalizing Revolution: Near Eastern Influence on Greek Culture in the Early Archaic Age. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. (1996). Creation of the Sacred: Tracks of Biology in Early Religions. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. (2008). ‘Prehistory of Presocratic Philosophy in an Orientalizing Context’. In Curd and Graham (eds.), 55–87.Google Scholar
Burkert, W. (2014). ‘How to Learn about Souls: The Derveni Papyrus and Democritus’. In Papadopoulou and Muellner (eds.), 107–14.Google Scholar
Burnyeat, M. (1999). ‘Culture and Society in Plato’s Republic’. Available online at http://tannerlectures.utah.edu/_documents/a-to-z/b/Burnyeat99.pdf (accessed 23 August 2019).Google Scholar
Burton, D. (2011). ‘Response and Composition in Archaic Greek Poetry’. Antichthon 45: 58–76.Google Scholar
Buxton, R. (1980). ‘Blindness and Limits: Sophokles and the Logic of Myth’. JHS 100: 22–37.Google Scholar
Cairns, D. L. (1993). Aidōs: The Psychology and Ethics of Honour and Shame in Ancient Greek Literature. Oxford.Google Scholar
Cairns, D. L. (2002). ‘The Meaning of the Veil in Ancient Greek Culture’. In Women’s Dress in the Ancient Greek World, ed. Llewellyn-Jones, L.. Swansea: 73–93.Google Scholar
Cairns, D. L. (2014). ‘Exemplarity and Narrative in the Greek Tradition’. In Defining Greek Narrative, ed. Cairns, D. L. and Scodel, R.. Edinburgh: 103–36.Google Scholar
Cairns, D. L. (2015). ‘The Horror and the Pity: Phrikē as a Tragic Emotion’. Psychoanalytic Inquiry 35: 75–94.Google Scholar
Cairns, D. L., and Howie, J. G. (2010). Bacchylides. Five Epinician Odes (3, 5, 9, 11, 13). Cambridge.Google Scholar
Calame, C. (1974). ‘Réflexions sur les genres littéraires en Grèce archaïque’. QUCC 17: 113–28.Google Scholar
Calame, C. (2005). Masks of Authority: Fiction and Pragmatics in Ancient Greek Poetics. Translated by P. M. Burk. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. A. (1982). Greek Lyric Poetry: A Selection of Early Greek Lyric, Elegiac and Iambic Poetry. 2nd ed. Bristol.Google Scholar
Canevaro, L. G. (2015). Hesiod’s Works and Days: How to Teach Self-Sufficiency. Oxford.Google Scholar
Cassin, B. (1987). ‘Le Chant des Sirènes dans le poème de Parménide’. In Études sur Parménide tome ii: Problèmes d’interprétation, ed. Aubenque, P.. Paris: 163–9.Google Scholar
Cassio, A. C. (2002). ‘Early Editions of the Greek Epics and Homeric Textual Criticism in the Sixth and Fifth Centuries bc’. In Omero tremila anni dopo, ed. Montanari, F.. Rome: 105–36.Google Scholar
Caston, V., and Graham, D. W. (eds.) (2002). Presocratic Philosophy: Essays in Honour of Alexander Mourelatos. Aldershot.Google Scholar
Classen, C. J. (1989). ‘Xenophanes and the Tradition of Epic Poetry’. In Ionian Philosophy, ed. Boudouris, K., 91–103. Athens.Google Scholar
Clay, D. (2012). ‘Empedocles at Panoplis and Delphi’. In Presocratics and Plato: Festschrift in Honor of Charles Kahn, ed. Patterson, R, Karasmanis, V. and Hermann, A.. Las Vegas, NV: 59–77.Google Scholar
Clay, J. S. (1993). ‘The Education of Perses: From “Mega Nepios” to “Dion Genos” and Back’. MD 31: 23–33.Google Scholar
Clay, J. S. (2011a). ‘The Homeric Hymns as Genre’. In The Homeric Hymns: Interpretative Essays, ed. Faulkner, A.. Oxford: 233–53.Google Scholar
Clay, J. S. (2011b). Homer’s Trojan Theater: Space, Vision, and Memory in the IIiad. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Clay, J. S. (2015). ‘Commencing Cosmogony and the Rhetoric of Poetic Authority’. In Cosmologies et cosmogonies dans la littérature antique = Entretiens sur l’Antiquité classique 61. Vandœuvres: 105–47.Google Scholar
Clinton, K. (2003). ‘Stages of Initiation into the Eleusinian and Samothracian Mysteries’. In Greek Mysteries: The Archaeology and Ritual of Ancient Greek Secret Cults, ed. Cosmopoulos, M. B.. London: 50–78.Google Scholar
Colborn, R. (2013). ‘Solving Problems with Acrostics: Manilius Dates Germanicus’. CQ 63: 450–2.Google Scholar
Collins, D. (2004). Master of the Game: Competition and Performance in Greek Poetry. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. (1986). The Rhetoric of Imitation: Genre and Poetic Memory in Virgil and Other Latin Poets. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. (1994). Genres and Readers: Lucretius, Love Elegy, Pliny’s Encyclopedia. Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
Cornford, F. M. (1912). From Religion to Philosophy: A Study in the Origins of Western Speculation. London.Google Scholar
Coxon, A. H. (2009). The Fragments of Parmenides: A Critical Text with Introduction and Translation, the Ancient Testimonia and a Commentary. Rev. ed. Schofield, M., with translation by R. D. McKirahan. Las Vegas, NV.Google Scholar
Curd, P. (1998). The Legacy of Parmenides: Eleatic Monism and Later Presocratic Thought. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Curd, P. (2002). ‘The Presocratics as Philosophers’. In Laks and Louguet (eds.), 115–38.Google Scholar
Curd, P. (2005). ‘On the Question of Religion and Natural Philosophy in Empedocles’. In Pierris (ed.), 137–62.Google Scholar
Curd, P. (2013a). ‘Where Are Love and Strife? Incorporeality in Empedocles’. In Early Greek Philosophy: The Presocratics and the Emergence of Reason, ed. McCoy, J.. Washington, DC: 113–38.Google Scholar
Curd, P. (2013b). ‘The Divine and the Thinkable: Toward an Account of the Intelligible Cosmos’. Rhizomata 1: 217–47.Google Scholar
Curd, P., and Graham, D. W. (2008). The Oxford Handbook of Presocratic Philosophy. Oxford.Google Scholar
Currie, B. (2012). ‘Hesiod on Human History’. In Greek Notions of the Past, eds. Marincola, J., Llewellyn-Jones, L. and Maciver, C.. Edinburgh: 37–64.Google Scholar
d’Alessio, G. B. (1995). ‘Una via lontana dal cammino degli uomini (Parm. Frr. 1+6 D.-K.; Pind. Ol. vi 22–27; Pae. viib 10–20)’. SIFC 13: 143–81.Google Scholar
d’Alessio, G. B. (2009). ‘Defining Local Identities’. In Hunter and Rutherford (eds.), 137–67.Google Scholar
de Jonge, C. C., and van Ophuijsen, J. M. (2010). ‘Greek Philosophers on Language’. In A Companion to the Ancient Greek Language, ed. Bakker, E.. Malden, MA, Oxford, and Chichester: 483–98.Google Scholar
de Rijk, L. M. (1983). ‘Did Parmenides Reject the Sensible World?’ In Graceful Reason: Essays in Ancient and Medieval Philosophy Presented to Joseph Owens, ed. Gerson, L. P.. Toronto: 29–53.Google Scholar
Deichgräber, K. (1933). ‘Hymnische Elemente in der Philosophischen Prosa der Vorsokratiker’. Philologus 88: 347–61.Google Scholar
Deichgräber, K. (1958). Parmenides’ Auffahrt zur Göttin des Rechts: Untersuchungen zum Prooimion seines Lehrgedichts. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Delatte, A. (1934). Les Conceptions de l’enthousiasme chez les philosophes présocratiques. Paris.Google Scholar
de Man, P. (1983). Blindness and Insight: Essays in the Rhetoric of Contemporary Criticism. 2nd ed. London.Google Scholar
Detienne, M. (1986). The Creation of Mythology. Translated by M. Cook. Chicago, IL. Originally published as L’Invention de la mythologie, Paris, 1981.Google Scholar
Detienne, M. (1989). ‘Culinary Practices and the Spirit of Sacrifice’. In The Cuisine of Sacrifice among the Greeks, ed. Detienne, M. and Vernant, J.-P., translated by P. Wissing. Chicago, IL: 1–20. Originally published as La Cuisine du sacrifice en pays grec, Paris, 1979.Google Scholar
Detienne, M. (1996). The Masters of Truth in Archaic Greece. Translated by J. Lloyd. Cambridge, MA. Originally published as Les Maîtres de vérité dans la Grèce archaïque, Paris, 1967.Google Scholar
di Cesare, D. (1980). ‘Heraklit und die Sprache’. In Sprachphilosophie in Antike und Mittelalter, ed. Mojsisch, B.. Amsterdam: 1–16.Google Scholar
Dougherty, C. (1993). The Poetics of Colonization: From City to Text in Archaic Greece. Oxford.Google Scholar
Douglas, M. (1966). Purity and Danger: An Analysis of the Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. London.Google Scholar
Dover, K. J. (1964). ‘The Poetry of Archilochus’. Entretiens sur l’Antiquité classique 10: 183–223.Google Scholar
Dover, K. J. (1975). ‘The Freedom of the Intellectual in Greek Society’. Talanta 7: 24–54.Google Scholar
Edmonds III, R. G. (2004). Myths of the Underworld Journey: Plato, Aristophanes, and the ‘Orphic’ Gold Tablets. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmonds III, R. G. (2013). Redefining Ancient Orphism: A Study in Greek Religion. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Edmunds, L. (1985). ‘The Genre of Theognidean Poetry’. In Figueira and Nagy (eds.), 96–111.Google Scholar
Edmundson, M. (1995). Literature against Philosophy, Plato to Derrida: A Defence of Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Effe, B. (1977). Dichtung und Lehre. Untersuchungen zur Typologie des antiken Lehrgedichts. Munich.Google Scholar
Faulkner, A. (2008). The Homeric Hymn to Aphrodite: Introduction, Text, and Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar
Federico, E. (2001). ‘La Katharsis di Epimenide ad Atene: La vicenda, gli usi e gli abusi ateniesi’. In Epimenide Cretese, ed. Federico, E. and Visconti, A.. Naples: 77–128.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. C. (1991). The Gods in Epic: Poets and Critics of the Classical Tradition. Oxford.Google Scholar
Feeney, D. C. (1995). ‘Criticism Ancient and Modern’. In Ethics and Rhetoric, ed. Innes, D. C., Hine, H. and Pelling, C. B. R.. Oxford: 301–10.Google Scholar
Fehling, D. (1965). ‘Zwei Untersuchungen zur griechischen Sprachphilosophie’. RhM 108: 212–29.Google Scholar
Ferrari, G. R. F. (1989). ‘Plato and Poetry’. In The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism: Volume 1: Classical Criticism, ed. Kennedy, G. A.. Cambridge: 92–148.Google Scholar
Feyerabend, B. (1984). ‘Zur Wegmetaphorik beim Goldblättchen aus Hipponion und dem Proömium des Parmenides’. RhM 127: 1–22.Google Scholar
Figueira, T. J. and Nagy, G. (eds.) (1985). Theognis of Megara: Poetry and the Polis. Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
Finnegan, R. (1977). Oral Poetry: Its Nature, Significance and Social Context. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Fischer-Hansen, T., Nielsen, T. H., and Ampolo, C. (2004). ‘Sikelia’. In An Inventory of Archaic and Classical Poleis, ed. Hansen, M. H. and Nielsen, T. H.. Oxford: 172–248.Google Scholar
Ford, A. (1985). ‘The Seal of Theognis: The Politics of Authorship in Archaic Greece’. In Figueira and Nagy (eds.), 82–95.Google Scholar
Ford, A. (2002). The Origins of Criticism: Literary Culture and Poetic Theory in Classical Greece. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Ford, A. (2003). ‘From Letters to Literature: Reading the “Song Culture” of Classical Greece’. In Written Texts and the Rise of Literate Culture in Ancient Greece, ed. Yunis, H.. Cambridge: 15–37.Google Scholar
Fowler, A. (1982). Kinds of Literature: An Introduction to the Theory of Genres and Modes. Oxford.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. (1997). ‘On the Shoulders of Giants: Intertextuality and Classical Studies’. MD 39: 13–34.Google Scholar
Fowler, D. (2000). ‘The Didactic Plot’. In Matrices of Genre: Authors, Canons and Society, ed. Depew, M. and Obbink, D.. Cambridge, MA: 205–19.Google Scholar
Fowler, R. L. (1987). Nature of Early Greek Lyric: Three Preliminary Studies. Toronto.Google Scholar
Fränkel, H. (1955). Wege und Formen frühgriechischen Denkens: Literarische und philosophiegeschichtliche Studien. Munich.Google Scholar
Fränkel, H. (1993). ‘Xenophanes’ Empiricism and His Critique of Knowledge (B34)’. In The Pre-Socratics: A Collection of Critical Essays, ed. Mourelatos, A. P. D., 118–31. Princeton, NJ. Originally published in 1925.Google Scholar
Fränkel, H. (1975a). ‘Studies in Parmenides’. In Studies in Presocratic Philosophy Volume 2: The Eleatics and Pluralists, ed. Furley, D. J. and Allen, R. E.. London: 1–47.Google Scholar
Fränkel, H. (1975b). Early Greek Poetry and Philosophy. Translated by M. Hadas and J. Willis. Oxford. Originally published as Dichtung und Philosophie des frühen Griechentums, New York, NY, 1951.Google Scholar
Frede, M. (2008). ‘Aristotle’s Account of the Origins of Philosophy’. In Curd and Graham (eds.), 501–29.Google Scholar
Frege, G. (1960). ‘On Sense and Reference’. In Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, ed. Geach, P. and Black, M.. Oxford: 56–78. Essay originally published in 1892 as ‘Über Sinn und Bedeutung’, Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, 100: 25–50.Google Scholar
Friedländer, P. (1941). ‘Pattern of Sound and Atomistic Theory in Lucretius’. AJPh 62: 16–34.Google Scholar
Furley, D. (1993). ‘Democritus and Epicurus on Sensible Qualities’. In Passions and Perceptions: Studies in Hellenistic Philosophy of Mind, ed. Brunschwig, J. and Nussbaum, M. C.. Cambridge: 72–94.Google Scholar
Furley, W. D., and Bremer, J. M. (2001). Greek Hymns: Selected Cult Songs from the Archaic to the Hellenistic Period. 2 vols. Tübingen.Google Scholar
Gadamer, H.-G. (1986). The Relevance of the Beautiful. Translated by N. Walker. Cambridge. Originally published as Die Aktualität des Schönen, Stuttgart, 1977.Google Scholar
Gadamer, H.-G. (2004). Truth and Method. 2nd, rev. ed. Translated by J. Weinsheimer and D. J. Marshall. London. Originally published as Wahrheit und Methode, Tübingen, 1960.Google Scholar
Gantz, T. (1993). Early Greek Myth: A Guide to Literary and Artistic Sources. Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
Garner, R. (1990). From Homer to Tragedy: The Art of Allusion in Greek Poetry. London and New York, NY.Google Scholar
Gemelli Marciano, M. L. (1990). Le metamorfosi della tradizione: mutamenti di significato e neologismi nel Peri physeos di Empedocle. Bari.Google Scholar
Gemelli Marciano, M. L. (2001). ‘Le “demonologie” Empedoclee: problemi di metodo e altro’. Aevum(ant) 1 (n.s.): 205–35.Google Scholar
Gemelli Marciano, M. L. (2005a). ‘Senofane: interpretazioni antiche e contesto culturale. La critica ai poeti e il cosiddetto “Monismo”’. In Senofane ed Elea tra Ionia e Magna Grecia, ed. Bugno, M., 63–76. Naples.Google Scholar
Gemelli Marciano, M. L. (2005b). ‘Empedocles’ Zoogony and Embryology’. In Pierris (ed.), 373–404.Google Scholar
Gemelli Marciano, M. L. (2008). ‘Images and Experience: At the Roots of Parmenides’ Aletheia’. AncPhil 28: 21–48.Google Scholar
Gemelli Marciano, M. L. (2013). Parmenide: suoni, immagini, esperienza: A cura di Livio Rossetti e Massimo Pulpito, ed. Rossetti, L. and Pulpito, M.. Sankt Augustin.Google Scholar
Gentili, B. (1988). Poetry and Its Public in Ancient Greece. Translated by A. T. Cole. Baltimore, MD. Originally published as Poesia e pubblico nella Grecia antica, Milan, 1984.Google Scholar
Gera, D. L. (2003). Ancient Greek Ideas on Speech, Language, and Civilization. Oxford.Google Scholar
Gernet, L. (1981). The Anthropology of Ancient Greece. Translated by J. B. Hamilton and B. Nagy. Baltimore, MD. Originally published as Anthropologie de la Grèce antique, Paris, 1968.Google Scholar
Gibson, J. (2009). ‘Literature and Knowledge’. In Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Literature, ed. Eldridge, R.. Oxford: 467–85.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (1991). The Poet’s Voice: Essays on Poetics and Greek Literature. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Goldhill, S. (1999). ‘Literary History without Literature: Reading Practices in the Ancient World’. SubStance 28: 57–89.Google Scholar
Goody, J., and Watt, I. (1963). ‘The Consequences of Literacy’. Comparative Studies in Society and History 5: 304–45.Google Scholar
Gould, John (2001). ‘On Making Sense of Greek Religion’. In Myth, Ritual, Memory, and Exchange: Essays in Greek Literature and Culture. Oxford: 203–34.Google Scholar
Graeser, A. (1977). ‘On Language, Thought, and Reality in Ancient Greek Philosophy’. Dialectica 31: 359–88.Google Scholar
Graf, F., and Johnston, S. I. (2013). Ritual Texts for the Afterlife: Orpheus and the Bacchic Gold Tablets. 2nd ed. London.Google Scholar
Graham, D. W. (2002). ‘Heraclitus and Parmenides’. In Caston and Graham (eds.), 27–44.Google Scholar
Graham, D. W. (2006). Explaining the Cosmos: The Ionian Tradition of Scientific Philosophy. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Graham, D. W. (2010). The Texts of Early Greek Philosophy: The Complete Fragments and Selected Testimonies of the Major Presocratics. 2 vols. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Granger, H. (2010). ‘Parmenides of Elea: Rationalist or Dogmatist?’ AncPhil 30: 15–38.Google Scholar
Graziosi, B. (2006). ‘Il rapporto tra autore ed opera nella tradizione biografica greca’. In L’autore e l’opera nella Grecia antica, ed. Roscalla, F.. Pavia: 155–74.Google Scholar
Graziosi, B. (2013). ‘The Poet in the Iliad’. In The Author’s Voice in Classical and Late Antiquity, ed. Marmodoro, A. and Hill, J.. Oxford: 9–38.Google Scholar
Grethlein, J. (2008). ‘Memory and Material Objects in the Iliad and the Odyssey’. JHS 128: 27–51.Google Scholar
Grethlein, J. (2010). The Greeks and Their Past: Poetry, Oratory and History in the Fifth Century bce. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Grethlein, J., and Huitink, L. (2017). ‘Homer’s Vividness: An Enactive Approach’. JHS 137: 67–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffith, M. (1990). ‘Contest and Contradiction in Early Greek Poetry’. In Cabinet of the Muses: Essays on Classical and Comparative Literature in Honor of Thomas G. Rosenmeyer, ed. Griffith, M. and Mastronarde, D. J. Atlanta, GA: 185–207.Google Scholar
Guthrie, W. K. C. (1962). A History of Greek Philosophy: Volume 1, The Earlier Presocratics and the Pythagoreans. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Guthrie, W.K.C. (1965). A History of Greek Philosophy: Volume 2, The Presocratic Tradition from Parmenides to Democritus. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gutzwiller, K. (2010). ‘Literary Criticism’. In A Companion to Hellenistic Literature, ed. Clauss, J. J. and Cuypers, M.. Malden, MA: 337–65.Google Scholar
Hahn, R. (2001). Anaximander and the Architects: The Contributions of Egyptian and Greek Architectural Technologies to the Origins of Greek Philosophy. Albany, NY.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. (1986). ‘Where Three Roads Meet: A Neglected Detail in the Oedipus Tyrannus’. JHS 106: 187–90.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. (2002). The Aesthetics of Mimesis: Ancient Texts and Modern Problems. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Halliwell, S. (2011). Between Ecstasy and Truth: Interpretations of Greek Poetics from Homer to Longinus. Oxford.Google Scholar
Harder, A. (2012). ‘Callimachus’ Aetia’. In A Companion to Hellenistic Literature, ed. Clauss, J. J. and Cuypers, M.. Oxford: 92–105.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. (1985). ‘Imago mundi: Cosmological and Ideological Aspects of the Shield of Achilles’. JHS 105: 11–31.Google Scholar
Hardie, P. (1995). ‘The Speech of Pythagoras in Ovid Metamorphoses 15: Empedoclean Epos’. CQ 45: 204–14.Google Scholar
Haubold, J. H. (2010). ‘Shepherd, Farmer, Poet, Sophist: Hesiod on His Own Reception’. In Plato and Hesiod, ed. Boys-Stones, G. R. and Haubold, J. H.. Oxford: 11–30.Google Scholar
Havelock, E. A. (1983). ‘The Linguistic Task of the Presocratics’. In Language and Thought in Early Greek Philosophy, ed. Robb, K.. La Salle, IL: 7–82.Google Scholar
Heath, M. (1991). ‘The Universality of Poetry in Aristotle’s Poetics’. CQ 41: 389–402.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and Time. Translated by J. Macquarrie and E. Robinson. Oxford. Originally published as Sein und Zeit, Tübingen, 1927.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. (1992). Parmenides. Translated by A. Schuwer and R. Rojcewicz. Bloomington, IN. Originally published as Parmenides, Frankfurt, 1982.Google Scholar
Heidegger, M. (2002). ‘The Origin of the Work of Art’. In Off the Beaten Track. Translated by J. Young and K. Haynes. Cambridge. Originally published as Holzwege, Frankfurt, 1950.Google Scholar
Heiden, B. (2007). ‘The Muses’ Uncanny Lies: Hesiod, “Theogony” 27 and Its Translators’. AJPh 128: 153–75.Google Scholar
Helms, M. W. (1988). Ulysses’ Sail: An Ethnographic Odyssey of Power, Knowledge, and Geographical Distance. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Herington, J. (1985). Poetry into Drama: Early Tragedy and the Greek Poetic Tradition. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Hinds, S. (1998). Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hölscher, U. (1965). ‘Weltzeiten und Lebenszyklus: Eine Nachprüfung der Empedokles-Doxographie’. Hermes 93: 7–33.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. L. (1995). ‘Written in the Stars: Poetry and Philosophy in the Phaenomena of Aratus’. Arachnion 2: 1–34.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. L. (2014). Hesiodic Voices: Studies in the Ancient Reception of Hesiod’s Works and Days. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. L., and Russell, D. A. (eds.) (2011). Plutarch: How to Study Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hunter, R. L., and Rutherford, I. (eds.) (2009). Wandering Poets in Ancient Greek Culture: Travel, Locality and Pan-Hellenism. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hussey, E. (1982). ‘Epistemology and Meaning in Heraclitus’. In Language and Logos, ed. Schofield, M. and Nussbaum, M. C.. Cambridge: 33–59.Google Scholar
Hussey, E. (1990). ‘The Beginnings of Epistemology: From Homer to Philolaus’. In Epistemology, ed. Everson, S.. Cambridge: 11–38.Google Scholar
Hussey, E. (2006). ‘Parmenides on Thinking’. In Common to Body and Soul: Philosophical Approaches to Explaining Living Behaviour in Greco-Roman Antiquity, ed. King, R. A. H.. Berlin: 11–38.Google Scholar
Inwood, B. (2001). The Poem of Empedocles: A Text and Translation with a Commentary. 2nd ed. Toronto.Google Scholar
Irwin, E. (2005). Solon and Early Greek Poetry: The Politics of Exhortation. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Jaeger, W. (1939). Paideia: The Ideal of Greek Culture: In Search of the Divine Centre. 3 vols. Translated by G. Highet. Oxford.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1960). ‘Linguistics and Poetics’. In Style in Language, ed. Sebeok, T. A.. Cambridge, MA: 350–77.Google Scholar
Janko, R. (1981). ‘The Structure of the Homeric Hymns: A Study in Genre’. Hermes 109: 9–24.Google Scholar
Janko, R. (1982). Homer, Hesiod and the Hymns: Diachronic Development in Epic Diction. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Janko, R. (2004). ‘Empedocles, “On Nature” i 233–364: A New Reconstruction of “P. Strasb. Gr.” Inv. 1665-6’. ZPE 150: 1–26.Google Scholar
Janko, R. (2010). Philodemus on Poems, Books 3–4: With the Fragments of Aristotle on Poets. Oxford.Google Scholar
Janko, R. (2016). ‘Parmenides in the Derveni Papyrus: New Images for a New Edition’. ZPE 200: 3–23.Google Scholar
Jauss, H. R. (1970). ‘Literary History as a Challenge to Literary Theory’. Translated by E. Benzinger. New Literary History 2: 7–37. Originally published as sections x–xii of Literaturgeschichte als Provokation der Literaturwissenschaft, Konstanz, 1967.Google Scholar
Jordan, M. D. (1981). ‘A Preface to the Study of Philosophic Genres’. Philosophy & Rhetoric 14: 199–211.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. (1960). ‘Religion and Natural Philosophy in Empedocles’ Doctrine of the Soul’. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 42: 3–35.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. (1979). The Art and Thought of Heraclitus: An Edition of the Fragments with Translation and Commentary. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. (2001). Pythagoras and the Pythagoreans: A Brief History. Indianapolis, IN.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. (2003). ‘Writing Philosophy: Prose and Poetry from Thales to Plato’. In Yunis (ed.), 139–61.Google Scholar
Kahn, C. H. (2005). ‘Parmenides and Being’. In Frühgriechisches Denken, ed. Rechenauer, G.. Göttingen: 216–26.Google Scholar
Kannicht, R. (1988). The Ancient Quarrel between Philosophy and Poetry: Aspects of the Greek Conception of Literature. Christchurch.Google Scholar
Kennedy, G. A. (1989). ‘Language and Meaning in Archaic and Classical Greece’. In The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism: Volume 1: Classical Criticism, ed. Kennedy, G. A.. Cambridge: 78–91.Google Scholar
Kern, O. (1888). ‘Empedokles und die Orphiker’. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 1: 498–508.Google Scholar
Kingsley, P. (1995). Ancient Philosophy, Mystery, and Magic: Empedocles and Pythagorean Tradition. Oxford.Google Scholar
Kirk, G. S., and Raven, J. E. (1957). The Presocratic Philosophers: A Critical History. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Koller, H. (1954). Die Mimesis in der Antike: Nachahmung, Darstellung, Ausdruck. Bern.Google Scholar
Kouremenos, T., Parássoglou, G. M., and Tsantsanoglou, K. (2006). The Derveni Papyrus. Florence.Google Scholar
Kowalzig, B. (2006). ‘The Aetiology of Empire? Hero-Cult and Athenian Tragedy’. BICS 87: 79–98.Google Scholar
Kowalzig, B. (2007). Singing for the Gods: Performances of Myth and Ritual in Archaic and Classical Greece. Oxford.Google Scholar
Kranz, W. (1916). ‘Über Aufbau und Bedeutung des Parmenideischen Gedichtes’. Sitzungsberichte der königlich preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften 47: 1158–76.Google Scholar
Kraus, M. (2013). ‘Parmenides’. In Die Philosophie Der Antike. Vol. 1: Frühgriechische Philosophie, ed. Flashar, H., Bremer, D., and Rechenauer, G.. Basel: 441–530.Google Scholar
Kristeva, J. (1980). Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art. New York, NY.Google Scholar
Kurke, L. (1990). ‘Pindar’s Sixth Pythian and the Tradition of Advice Poetry’. TAPhA 120: 85–107.Google Scholar
Kurke, L. (2010). Aesopic Conversations: Popular Tradition, Cultural Dialogue, and the Invention of Greek Prose. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Laird, A. (2003). ‘Figures of Allegory from Homer to Latin Epic’. In Boys-Stones (ed.), 151–75.Google Scholar
Laird, A. (2006). ‘The Value of Ancient Literary Criticism’. In Ancient Literary Criticism, ed. Laird, A.. Oxford: 1–36.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., and Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York, NY.Google Scholar
Laks, André (2001). ‘Ecriture, prose, et les débuts de la philosophie grecque’. Methodos 1: 131–51.Google Scholar
Laks, André (2002). ‘Reading the Readings: On the First Person Plurals in the Strasburg Empedocles’. In Caston and Graham (eds.), 127–37.Google Scholar
Laks, André (2004). Le Vide et la haine: éléments pour une histoire archaïque de la négativité. Paris.Google Scholar
Laks, André (2005). ‘Some Thoughts about the Empedoclean Cosmic and Demonic Cycles’. In Pierris (ed.), 265–82.Google Scholar
Laks, André (2013). ‘Phenomenon and Reference: Revisiting Parmenides, Empedocles, and the Problem of Rationalization’. In Modernity’s Classics, ed. Humphreys, S. C. and Wagner, R.. New York, NY: 165–86.Google Scholar
Laks, André (2018). The Concept of Presocratic Philosophy. Translated by G. W. Most. Princeton, NJ. Originally published as Introduction à la ‘philosophie présocratique’, Paris, 2006.Google Scholar
Laks, A., and Louguet, C. (2002). Qu’est-ce que la philosophie présocratique?/ What Is Presocratic Philosophy? Paris.Google Scholar
Lamarque, P. (2009a). ‘Poetry and Abstract Thought’. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 33: 37–52.Google Scholar
Lang, B. (1990). The Anatomy of Philosophical Style: Literary Philosophy and the Philosophy of Literature. Oxford.Google Scholar
Lapini, W. (2013). Testi frammentari e critica del testo: problemi di filologia filosofia greca. Rome.Google Scholar
Latona, M. J. (2008). ‘Reining in the Passions: The Allegorical Interpretation of Parmenides B Fragment 1’. AJPh 129: 199–230.Google Scholar
Lavery, J. (2007). ‘Philosophical Genres and Literary Forms: A Mildly Polemical Introduction’. Poetics Today 28: 171–89.Google Scholar
Ledbetter, G. M. (2003). Poetics before Plato: Interpretation and Authority in Early Greek Theories of Poetry. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Lesher, J. H. (1981). ‘Perceiving and Knowing in the Iliad and Odyssey’. Phronesis 26: 2–24.Google Scholar
Lesher, J. H. (1983). ‘Xenophanes’ Scepticism’. In Essays in Ancient Greek Philosophy, Vol. 2, ed. Anton, J. and Preus, T.. New York, NY: 20–40.Google Scholar
Lesher, J. H. (1984). ‘Parmenides’ Critique of Thinking. The Poluderis Elenchos of Fragment 7’. OSAPh 2: 1–30.Google Scholar
Lesher, J. H. (1992). Xenophanes of Colophon: A Text and Translation with a Commentary. Toronto.Google Scholar
Lesher, J. H. (1994). ‘The Emergence of Philosophical Interest in Cognition’. OSAPh 12: 1–34.Google Scholar
Lesher, J. H. (2008). ‘The Humanizing of Knowledge in Presocratic Thought’. In Curd and Graham (eds.), 458–84.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, J. L. (2009). Hellenistic Collection: Philitas, Alexander of Aetolia, Hermesianax, Euphorion, Parthenius. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Lincoln, B. (1999). Theorizing Myth: Narrative, Ideology, and Scholarship. London and Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Llewellyn-Jones, L. (2003). Aphrodite’s Tortoise: The Veiled Woman of Ancient Greece. Swansea.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. (1987). The Revolutions of Wisdom: Studies in the Claims and Practice of Ancient Greek Science. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. E. R. (2006). ‘The Pluralism of Intellectual Life before Plato’. In Principles and Practices in Ancient Greek and Chinese Science. Aldershot: 1–13. Originally published as ‘Le Pluralisme de la vie intellectuelle avant Platon’, translated by A. Laks, in Laks and Louguet (eds.), 1–13.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1966). ‘Thinking and Sense-Perception in Empedocles: Mysticism or Materialism’. CQ 16: 256–76.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1985). ‘Early Greek Philosophy’. In The Cambridge History of Classical Literature Volume 1: Greek Literature, ed. Knox, B. M. W. and Easterling, P. E.. Cambridge: 245–57.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1992). ‘Stoic Readings of Homer’. In Homer’s Ancient Readers: The Hermeneutics of Greek Epic’s Earliest Exegetes, ed. Lamberton, R. and Keaney, J. J.. Princeton, NJ: 41–66.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1993). ‘Empedocles’ Cosmic Cycle in the ’Sixties’. In The Pre-Socratics: A Collection of Critical Essays, ed. Mourelatos, A. P. D.. Princeton, NJ: 397–425.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (1996). ‘Parmenides on Thinking Being’. Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium of Ancient Philosophy 12: 125–51.Google Scholar
Long, A. A. (ed.) (1999). The Cambridge Companion to Early Greek Philosophy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Lowe, N. J. (2000). The Classical Plot and the Invention of Western Narrative. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, M. M. (later publishing as McCabe, M. M.) (1982). ‘Parmenides’ Dilemma’. Phronesis 27: 1–12.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, T. (2016). ‘The Contents of Empedocles’ Poem: A New Argument for the Single-Poem Hypothesis’. ZPE 200: 25–32.Google Scholar
Mackenzie, T. (forthcoming). ‘Empedocles, Personal Identity, and the Narrative of the Fallen Daimōn’. Phoenix.Google Scholar
Maehler, H. (1963). Die Auffassung des Dichterberufs im frühen Griechentum bis zur Zeit Pindars. Göttingen.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1985). ‘Historical and Philosophical Aspects of Gorgias’ On What Is Not’. SicGymn 36: 243–71.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1992). Heresiography in Context: Hippolytus’ Elenchos as a Source for Greek Philosophy. Leiden.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J. (1995). ‘Insight by Hindsight: Intentional Unclarity in Presocratic Proems’. BICS 40: 225–232.Google Scholar
Mansfeld, J., and Primavesi, O. (2012). Die Vorsokratiker: Griechisch/Deutsch. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Marcovich, M. (1978). ‘Xenophanes on Drinking-Parties and Olympic Games’. ICS 3: 1–26.Google Scholar
Marías, J. (1971). ‘Literary Genres in Philosophy’. In Philosophy as Dramatic Theory. Translated by James Parsons. University Park, PA: 1–35.Google Scholar
Marmodoro, A., and Hill, J. (eds.) (2013). The Author’s Voice in Classical and Late Antiquity. Oxford.Google Scholar
Martin, R. P. (1989). The Language of Heroes: Speech and Performance in the Iliad. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Martin, R. P. (1993). ‘The Seven Sages as Performers of Wisdom’. In Cultural Poetics in Archaic Greece: Cult, Performance, Politics, ed. Dougherty, C. and Kurke, L.. Cambridge: 108–30.Google Scholar
McCabe, M. M. (previously publishing as Mackenzie, M. M.) (2000). Plato and His Predecessors. Cambridge.Google Scholar
McNelis, C., and Sens, A. (2016). The Alexandra of Lycophron: A Literary Study. Oxford.Google Scholar
Miller, M. (2006). ‘Ambiguity and Transport: Reflections on the Proem to Parmenides’ Poem’. OSAPh 30: 1–47.Google Scholar
Mitsis, P. (1993). ‘Committing Philosophy on the Reader: Didactic Coercion and Reader Autonomy in De Rerum Natura’. MD 31: 111–28.Google Scholar
Mogyoródi, E. (2006). ‘Xenophanes’ Epistemology and Parmenides’ Quest for Knowledge’. In Sassi (ed.), 123–60.Google Scholar
Morrison, A. D. (2007). The Narrator in Archaic Greek and Hellenistic Poetry. 1st ed. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Moss, J. (2007). ‘What Is Imitative Poetry and Why Is It Bad?’ In The Cambridge Companion to Plato’s Republic, ed. Ferrari, G. R. F.. Cambridge: 415–44.Google Scholar
Most, G. W. (1993a). ‘Hesiod and the Textualization of Personal Temporality’. In La componente autobiografica nella poesia greca e latina fra realtà e artificio letterario, ed. Arrighetti, G. and Montanari, F.. Pisa: 73–91.Google Scholar
Most, G. W. (1993b). ‘Die Früheste erhaltene griechische Dichterallegorese’. RhM 136: 209–12.Google Scholar
Most, G. W. (2002). ‘Heidegger’s Greeks’. Arion: A Journal of Humanities and the Classics 10: 83–98.Google Scholar
Most, G. W. (2007). ‘ἄλλος δ’ ἐξ ἄλλου δέχεται. Presocratic Philosophy and Traditional Greek Epic’. In Literatur und Religion, 1: Wege zu einer mythisch-rituellen Poetik bei den Griechen, ed. Bierl, A., Lämmle, R. and Wesselmann, K.. Berlin: 271–301.Google Scholar
Most, G. W. (2011). ‘“What Ancient Quarrel between Philosophy and Poetry?”’ In Plato and the Poets, ed. Destrée, P. and Herrmann, F.-G.. Leiden: 1–20.Google Scholar
Mourelatos, A. P. D. (1987). ‘Gorgias on the Function of Language’. Philosophical Topics 15: 135–70.Google Scholar
Mourelatos, A. P. D. (2002). ‘La Terre et les étoiles dans la cosmologie de Xénophane’. In Laks and Louguet (eds.), 331–50.Google Scholar
Mourelatos, A. P. D. (2008a). The Route of Parmenides: A Study of Word, Image, and Argument in the Fragments. Expanded ed. Las Vegas, NV.Google Scholar
Mourelatos, A. P. D. (2008b). ‘Heraclitus, Parmenides, and the Naïve Metaphysics of Things’. In The Route of Parmenides: A Study of Word, Image, and Argument in the Fragments. Rev., expanded ed. Las Vegas, NV: 299–332.Google Scholar
Mourelatos, A. P. D. (2012). ‘Parmenides, Early Greek Astronomy, and Modern Scientific Realism’. In Parmenides, Venerable and Awesome. Plato, Theaetetus 183e: Proceedings of the International Symposium, ed. Cordero, N.-L.. Las Vegas, NV: 167–90.Google Scholar
Munteanu, D. L. (2012). Tragic Pathos: Pity and Fear in Greek Philosophy and Tragedy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Murray, P. (1996). Plato on Poetry: Ion; Republic 376e–398b9; Republic 595–608b10. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Nagy, G. (1979). The Best of the Achaeans: Concepts of the Hero in Archaic Greek Poetry. Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
Nagy, G. (1989). ‘Early Greek Views of Poets and Poetry’. In The Cambridge History of Literary Criticism Vol. 1: Classical Criticism, ed. Kennedy, G. A.. Cambridge: 1–77.Google Scholar
Nagy, G. (1994). ‘Genre and Occasion’. Mètis: Anthropologie des mondes grecs anciens 9–10: 11–25.Google Scholar
Nehamas, A. (1982). ‘Plato on Imitation and Poetry in Republic 10’. In Plato on Beauty, Wisdom, and the Arts, ed. Moravcsik, J. M. E. and Temko, P.. Totowa, NJ: 47–78.Google Scholar
Nehamas, A. (2002). ‘Parmenidean Being/Heraclitean Fire’. In Caston and Graham (eds.), 45–64.Google Scholar
Nelis, D. P. (2004). ‘Georgics 2.458–542: Virgil, Aratus and Empedocles’. Dictynna 1. Available online at https://journals.openedition.org/dictynna/161 (accessed 18 September 2019).Google Scholar
Nightingale, A. W. (1995). Genres in Dialogue: Plato and the Construct of Philosophy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Nightingale, A. W. (2007). ‘The Philosophers in Archaic Greek Culture’. In The Cambridge Companion to Archaic Greece, ed. Shapiro, H. A.. Cambridge: 169–98.Google Scholar
Norden, E. (1913). Agnostos Theos: Untersuchungen zur Formengeschichte religiöser Rede. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Nünlist, R. (1998). Poetologische Bildersprache in der frühgriechischen Dichtung. Berlin.Google Scholar
Nünlist, R. (2009). The Ancient Critic at Work: Terms and Concepts of Literary Criticism in Greek Scholia. Cambridge.Google Scholar
O’Brien, D. (1970). ‘The Effect of a Simile: Empedocles’ Theories of Seeing and Breathing’. JHS 90: 140–79.Google Scholar
O’Brien, D. (2001). ‘Empedocles: The Wandering Daimon and the Two Poems’. Aevum(ant) 1 (n.s.): 79–179.Google Scholar
O’Brien, D. (2005). ‘Empedocles: A Synopsis’. In Frühgriechisches Denken, ed. Rechenauer, G.. Göttingen: 316–42.Google Scholar
O’Brien, D. (2006). ‘Life beyond the Stars: Aristotle, Plato and Empedocles’. In Common to Body and Soul: Philosophical Approaches to Explaining Living Behaviour in Greco-Roman Antiquity, ed. King, R. A. H.. Berlin: 49–102.Google Scholar
O’Keefe, T. (1997). ‘The Ontological Status of Sensible Qualities for Democritus and Epicurus’. AncPhil 17: 119–34.Google Scholar
Osborne, C. (later publishing as Rowett, C.). (1987). ‘Empedocles Recycled’. CQ 37: 24–50.Google Scholar
Osborne, C. (1998). ‘Was Verse the Default Form for Presocratic Philosophy?’ In Form and Content in Didactic Poetry, ed. Atherton, C.. Bari: 23–35.Google Scholar
Page, D. L. (1955). Sappho and Alcaeus: An Introduction to the Study of Ancient Lesbian Poetry. Oxford.Google Scholar
Palmer, J. (2008). ‘Classical Representations and Uses of the Presocratics’. In Curd and Graham (eds.), 530–54.Google Scholar
Palmer, J. (2013). ‘Revelation and Reasoning in Kalliopeia’s Address to Empedocles’. Rhizomata 1: 308–29.Google Scholar
Palmer, J. (2016). ‘Parmenides’. In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. E. N. Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2016/entries/parmenides/ (accessed 18 September 2019).Google Scholar
Palumbo, L. (2007). ‘Empedocle e il linguaggio poetico’. In Empedocle tra poesia, medicina, filosofia e politica, ed. Casertano, G.. Naples: 83–107.Google Scholar
Papadopoulou, I., and Muellner, L. (eds.) (2014). Poetry as Initiation: The Center for Hellenic Studies Symposium on the Derveni Papyrus. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Parker, R. (1983). Miasma: Pollution and Purification in Early Greek Religion. Oxford.Google Scholar
Parker, R. (1995). ‘Early Orphism’. In The Greek World, ed. Powell, A.. London: 483–510.Google Scholar
Parker, R. (1999). ‘Through a Glass Darkly: Sophocles and the Divine’. In Sophocles Revisited: Essays Presented to Sir Hugh Lloyd-Jones, ed. Griffin, J.. Oxford: 11–30.Google Scholar
Parker, R. (2017). Greek Gods Abroad: Names, Natures, and Transformations. Oakland, CA.Google Scholar
Patzer, A. (2006). Wort und Ort: Oralität und Literarizität im sozialen Kontext der frühgriechischen Philosophie. Munich.Google Scholar
Pellikaan-Engel, M. E. (1974). Hesiod and Parmenides: A New View on Their Cosmologies and on Parmenides’ Proem. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Peponi, A.-E. (2013). ‘Dithyramb in Greek Thought’. In Dithyramb in Context, ed. Kowalzig, B. and Wilson, P., 353–67. Oxford.Google Scholar
Petrovic, A., and Petrovic, I. (2016). Inner Purity and Pollution in Greek Religion: Volume i: Early Greek Religion. Oxford.Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, R. (1968). History of Classical Scholarship: From the Beginnings to the End of the Hellenistic Age. Oxford.Google Scholar
Picot, J.-C. (2007). ‘Empedocles, Fragment 115.3: Can One of the Blessed Pollute His Limbs with Blood?’ In Reading Ancient Texts. Volume i: Presocratics and Plato, ed. Stern-Gillet, S. and Corrigan, K.. Leiden: 41–56.Google Scholar
Picot, J.-C. (2008a). ‘Empédocle pouvait-il faire de la lune le séjour des bienheureux?’ Organon 37: 9–38.Google Scholar
Picot, J.-C., and Berg, W. (2015). ‘Lions and promoi: Final Phase of Exile for Empedocles’ daimones’. Phronesis 60: 380–409.Google Scholar
Picot, J.-C., and Berg, W. (2018). ‘Apollo, Eros, and Epic Allusions in Empedocles, Frr. 134 and 29 DK’. AJPh 139: 365–96.Google Scholar
Pierris, A. L. (ed.) (2005). The Empedoclean Κόσμος: Structure, Process and the Question of Cyclicity Part 1: Papers. Patras.Google Scholar
Popa, T. (2000). ‘The Reception of Parmenides’ Poetry in Antiquity’. StudClas 34–6: 5–27.Google Scholar
Porter, J. I. (2010). The Origins of Aesthetic Thought in Ancient Greece: Matter, Sensation, and Experience. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Pratt, L. H. (1993). Lying and Poetry from Homer to Pindar: Falsehood and Deception in Archaic Greek Poetics. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Price, S. R. F. (1984). ‘Gods and Emperors: The Greek Language of the Roman Imperial Cult’. JHS 104: 79–95.Google Scholar
Primavesi, O. (2001). ‘La daimonologia della fisica empedoclea’. Aevum(ant) 1 (n.s.): 3–68.Google Scholar
Primavesi, O. (2005). ‘Theologische Allegorie: Zur philosophischen Funktion einer poetischen Form bei Parmenides und Empedokles’. In Wissensvermittlung in Dichterische Gestalt = Palingenesia 85, ed. Horster, M. and Reitz, C.. Stuttgart: 69–93.Google Scholar
Primavesi, O. (2007). ‘Zur Überlieferung und Bedeutung des Empedokleischen Titels “Καθαρμοί”’. In Katharsiskonzeptionen vor Aristoteles zum kulturellen Hintergrund des Tragödiensatzes, ed. Vöhler, M. and Seidensticker, B.. Berlin: 183–226.Google Scholar
Primavesi, O. (2008a). ‘Empedocles: Physical and Mythical Divinity’. In Curd and Graham (eds.), 250–83.Google Scholar
Primavesi, O. (2008b). Empedokles ‘Physika’ I, Eine Rekonstruktion des zentralen Gedankengangs. Berlin.Google Scholar
Primavesi, O. (2013a). ‘Le Chemin vers la révélation: lumière et nuit dans le proème de Parménide’. PhilAnt 13: 37–82.Google Scholar
Primavesi, O. (2013b). ‘Empedokles’. In Die Philosophie der Antike. Vol. 1: Frühgriechische Philosophie, ed. Flashar, H., Bremer, D. and Rechenauer, G.. Basel: 667–739.Google Scholar
Primavesi, O. (2016). ‘Empedocles’ Cosmic Cycle and the Pythagorean Tetractys’. Rhizomata 4: 5–29.Google Scholar
Prince, S. (2015). Antisthenes of Athens: Texts, Translations, and Commentary. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Pucci, P. (1987). Odysseus Polutropos: Intertextual Readings in the Odyssey and the Iliad. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Puelma, M. (1989). ‘Der Dichter und die Wahrheit in der griechischen Poetik von Homer bis Aristoteles’. MH 46: 65–100.Google Scholar
Rangos, S. (2012). ‘Empedocles on Divine Nature’. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 3: 315–38.Google Scholar
Ranzato, S. (2015). Il kouros e la verità: polivalenza delle immagini nel poema di Parmenide. Pisa.Google Scholar
Rashed, M. (2008). ‘Le Proème des “Catharmes” d’Empédocle. Reconstitution et commentaire’. Elenchos 29: 7–38.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, K. (1916). Parmenides und die Geschichte der griechischen Philosophie. Bonn.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, K. (1960). ‘Personifikation und Allegorie’. In Vermächtnis der Antike: Gesammelte Essays zur Philosophie und Geschichtsschreibung, ed. Becker, C.. Göttingen: 7–40.Google Scholar
Reinhardt, K. (1993). ‘The Relation between the Two Parts of Parmenides’ Poem’. In The Pre-Socratics: A Collection of Critical Essays, ed. Mourelatos, A. P. D.. Princeton, NJ: 293–311.Google Scholar
Renehan, R. (1980). ‘On the Greek Origins of the Concepts Incorporeality and Immateriality’. GRBS 21: 105–38.Google Scholar
Richardson, N. J. (1975). ‘Homeric Professors in the Age of the Sophists’. PCPhS 21: 65–81.Google Scholar
Richardson, N. J. (1983). ‘Recognition Scenes in the Odyssey and Ancient Literary Criticism’. PLLS 4: 219–35.Google Scholar
Richardson, N. J. (1992). ‘Panhellenic Cults and Panhellenic Poets’. In The Cambridge Ancient History: Volume 5: The Fifth Century bc, ed. Lewis, D. M., Davies, J. K., Boardman, J. and Ostwald, M.. 2nd ed. Cambridge: 223–44.Google Scholar
Richardson, N. J. (2010). Three Homeric Hymns: To Apollo, Hermes, and Aphrodite. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Riedweg, C. (1987). Mysterienterminologie bei Platon, Philon und Klemens von Alexandrien. Berlin.Google Scholar
Riedweg, C. (2008). Pythagoras: His Life, Teaching, and Influence. Translated by Steven Rendall. Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Ritoók, Z. (1989). ‘The Views of Early Greek Epic on Poetry and Art’. Mnemosyne 42: 331–48.Google Scholar
Robbiano, C. (2006). Becoming Being: On Parmenides’ Transformative Philosophy. Sankt Augustin.Google Scholar
Romano, A. (2012). ‘Euripidean Explainers’. In Greek Notions of the Past in the Archaic and Classical Eras, ed. Marincola, J., Llewellyn-Jones, L. and Maciver, C.. Edinburgh: 127–43.Google Scholar
Rösler, W. (1980a). ‘Die Entdeckung der Fiktionalität in der Antike’. Poetica 12: 283–319.Google Scholar
Rossi, L. E. (1971). ‘I generi letterari e le loro leggi scritte e non scritte nelle letterature classiche’. BICS 18: 69–94.Google Scholar
Rowett, C. (previously publishing as Osborne, C.) (2016). ‘Love, Sex and the Gods: Why Things Have Divine Names in Empedocles’ Poem, and Why They Come in Pairs’. Rhizomata 4: 80–110.Google Scholar
Russell, D. A., and Winterbottom, W. (1972). Ancient Literary Criticism: The Principal Texts in New Translations. Oxford.Google Scholar
Rutherford, I. (2011). ‘Singing Myth: Pindar’. In A Companion to Greek Mythology, ed. Dowden, K. and Livingstone, N.. Malden, MA: 109–23.Google Scholar
Samons, L. J. (1999). ‘Aeschylus, the Alkmeonids and the Reform of the Areopagos’. CJ 94: 221–33.Google Scholar
Santamaría, M. A. (2018). The Derveni Papyrus: Unearthing Ancient Mysteries. Leiden and Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Sassi, M. M. (1988). ‘Parmenide al bivio. Per un’interpretazione del proemio’. PP 43: 383–96.Google Scholar
Sassi, M. M. (ed.) (2006). La costruzione del discorso filosofico nell’età dei presocratici. Pisa.Google Scholar
Sassi, M. M. (2018). The Beginnings of Philosophy in Greece. Translated by M. Asuni. Princeton, NJ. Originally published as Gli inizi della filosofia in Grecia, Turin, 2009.Google Scholar
Schäfer, C. (1996). Xenophanes von Kolophon: ein Vorsokratiker zwischen Mythos und Philosophie. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Schein, S. L. (1984). The Mortal Hero: An Introduction to Homer’s Iliad. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
Schmitt Pantel, P. (1992). La Cité au banquet: histoire des repas publics dans les cités grecques. Rome.Google Scholar
Schmitter, P. (1991). ‘Vom Mythos zum Logos: Erkenntniskritik und Sprachreflexion bei den Vorsokratikern’. In Geschichte der Sprachtheorie 2: Sprachtheorien der abendländischen Antike, ed. Schmitter, P.. Tübingen: 57–86.Google Scholar
Schwabl, H. (1963). ‘Hesiod und Parmenides: Zur Formung des Parmenideischen Prooimions (28 B 1)’. RhM 106: 134–42.Google Scholar
Scully, S. (2003). ‘Reading the Shield of Achilles: Terror, Anger, Delight’. HSPh 101: 29–47.Google Scholar
Segal, C. P. (1974). ‘Eros and Incantation: Sappho and Oral Poetry’. Arethusa 7: 139–60.Google Scholar
Shankman, S. (1983). ‘Led by the Light of the Maeonian Star: Aristotle on Tragedy and “Odyssey” 17.415–444’. ClAnt 2: 108–16.Google Scholar
Sharrock, A., and Morales, H. (eds.) (2000). Intratextuality: Greek and Roman Textual Relations. Oxford.Google Scholar
Shaw, M. M. (2014). ‘Aither and the Four Roots in Empedocles’. Research in Phenomenology 44: 170–93.Google Scholar
Shklovsky, V. (1990). ‘Art as Technique’. In Theory of Prose, translated by B. Sher. Elmwood Park, IL: 1–14.Google Scholar
Sider, D. (1984). ‘Empedocles B 96 (462 Bollack) and the Poetry of Adhesion’. Mnemosyne 37: 14–24.Google Scholar
Sider, D. (2001). ‘Fragments 1–22 W2: Text, Apparatus Criticus, and Translation’. In Boedeker and Sider (eds.), 13–29.Google Scholar
Sider, D. (2006). ‘The New Simonides and the Question of Historical Elegy’. AJPh 127: 327–46.Google Scholar
Silk, M. S. (1974). Interaction in Poetic Imagery: With Special Reference to Early Greek Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Slaveva-Griffin, S. (2003). ‘Of Gods, Philosophers, and Charioteers: Content and Form in Parmenides’ Proem and Plato’s “Phaedrus”’. TAPhA 133: 227–53.Google Scholar
Slings, S. R. (1990). ‘The I in Personal Archaic Lyric: An Introduction’. In The Poet’s ‘I’ in Archaic Greek Lyric, ed. Slings, S. R.. Amsterdam: 1–30.Google Scholar
Sluiter, I. (1997). ‘The Greek Tradition’. In The Emergence of Semantics in Four Linguistic Traditions: Hebrew, Sanskrit, Greek, Arabic, ed. van Bekkum, W. J., Houben, J., Versteegh, K. and Sluiter, I.. Amsterdam: 148–224.Google Scholar
Snell, B. (1924). Die Ausdrücke für den Begriff des Wissens in der vorplatonischen Philosophie. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Snell, B. (1944). ‘Die Nachrichten über die Lehren des Thales und die Anfänge der griechischen Philosophie‐ und Literaturgeschichte’. Philologus 96: 170–82.Google Scholar
Snell, B. (1973). ‘Wie die Griechen lernten, was geistige Tätigkeit ist’. JHS 93: 172–84.Google Scholar
Stanford, W. B. (1983). Greek Tragedy and the Emotions: An Introductory Study. London.Google Scholar
Stehle, E. (2001). ‘A Bard of the Iron Age and His Auxiliary Muse’. In Boedeker and Sider (eds.), 106–19.Google Scholar
Stehle, E. (2005). ‘The Addressees of Empedokles, Katharmoi Fr. B112’. AncPhil 25: 247–72.Google Scholar
Stein, H. (1852). Empedoclis Agrigentini fragmenta disposuit recensuit adnotavit H. Stein. Præmissa est de Empedoclis scriptis disputatio. Bonn.Google Scholar
Stevens, W. (1951). The Necessary Angel: Essays on Reality and the Imagination. New York, NY.Google Scholar
Stolnitz, J. (1992). ‘On the Cognitive Triviality of Art’. British Journal of Aesthetics 32: 191–200.Google Scholar
Stroh, W. (1976). ‘Hesiods lügende Musen’. In Studien zum antiken Epos, ed. Görgemanns, H. and Schmidt, E. A., 85–112. Meisenheim am Glan.Google Scholar
Struck, P. (2004). Birth of the Symbol: Ancient Readers at the Limits of Their Texts. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Svenbro, J. (1984). La parola e il marmo: alle origini della poetica greca. 2nd ed. Turin.Google Scholar
Swift, L.A. (2012). ‘Archilochus the “Anti-hero”? Heroism, Flight and Values in Homer and the New Archilochus Fragment (P.Oxy lxix 4708)’. JHS 132: 139–55.Google Scholar
Tarán, L. (1965). Parmenides: A Text with Translation, Commentary, and Critical Essays. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Tor, S. (2015). ‘Parmenides’ Epistemology and the Two Parts of His Poem’. Phronesis 60: 3–39.Google Scholar
Tor, S. (2016). ‘Heraclitus on Apollo’s Signs and His Own: Contemplating Oracles and Philosophical Enquiry’. In Theologies of Ancient Greek Religion, ed. Eidinow, E., Kindt, J. and Osborne, R.. Cambridge: 89–116.Google Scholar
Tor, S. (2017). Mortal and Divine in Early Greek Epistemology: A Study of Hesiod, Xenophanes and Parmenides. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Trépanier, S. (2003). ‘Empedocles on the Ultimate Symmetry of the World’. OSAPh 24: 1–57.Google Scholar
Trépanier, S. (2010). ‘Early Greek Theology: The Gods as Nature and Natural Gods’. In The Gods of Ancient Greece: Identities and Transformations, ed. Erskine, A. and Bremmer, J.. Edinburgh: 273–317.Google Scholar
Trépanier, S. (2014). ‘From Wandering Limbs to Limbless Gods: Δαίμων as Substance in Empedocles’. Apeiron 47: 172–210.Google Scholar
Trépanier, S. (2017). ‘From Hades to the Stars: Empedocles on the Cosmic Habitats of Soul’. ClAnt 36: 130–82.Google Scholar
Tsagalis, C. (2008). The Oral Palimpsest: Exploring Intertextuality in the Homeric Epics. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Ustinova, Y. (2009). Caves and the Ancient Greek Mind: Descending Underground in the Search for Ultimate Truth. Oxford.Google Scholar
van der Ben, N. (1975). The Proem of Empedocles’ Peri Physios: Towards a New Edition of All the Fragments. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
van Groningen, B. A. (1958). La Composition littéraire archaïque grecque: procédés et réalisations. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
van Noorden, H. (2014). Playing Hesiod: The ‘Myth of the Races’ in Classical Antiquity. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Verdenius, W. J. (1981). ‘Gorgias’ Doctrine of Deception’. In The Sophists and Their Legacy, ed. Kerferd, G. B.. Wiesbaden: 116–28.Google Scholar
Verdenius, W. J. (1983). ‘The Principles of Greek Literary Criticism’. Mnemosyne 36: 14–59.Google Scholar
Vernant, J.-P. (1982). The Origins of Greek Thought. Translated from the French. Ithaca, NY. Originally published as Les Origines de la pensée grecque, Paris, 1962.Google Scholar
Vernant, J.-P. (1983). Myth and Thought among the Greeks. Translated from the French. London. Originally published as Mythe et pensée chez les Grecs, Paris, 1965.Google Scholar
Versnel, H. S. (2002). ‘The Poetics of the Magical Charm: An Essay in the Power of Words’. In Magic and Ritual in the Ancient World, ed. Mirecki, P. and Meyer, M.. Leiden: 105–58.Google Scholar
Volk, K. (2002). The Poetics of Latin Didactic: Lucretius, Vergil, Ovid, Manilius. Oxford.Google Scholar
von Fritz, K. (1945). ‘ΝΟΥΣ, ΝΟΕΙΝ, and Their Derivatives in Pre-Socratic Philosophy (Excluding Anaxagoras): Part I. From the Beginnings to Parmenides’. CPh 40: 223–42.Google Scholar
von Fritz, K. (1946). ‘ΝΟΥΣ, ΝΟΕΙΝ, and Their Derivatives in Pre-Socratic Philosophy (Excluding Anaxagoras): Part II. The Post-Parmenidean Period’. CPh 41: 12–34.Google Scholar
Walsh, G. B. (1984). The Varieties of Enchantment: Early Greek Views of the Nature and Function of Poetry. Chapel Hill, NC.Google Scholar
Wardy, R. B. (1988). ‘Eleatic Pluralism’. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 70: 125–46.Google Scholar
Wardy, R.B. (1996). The Birth of Rhetoric: Gorgias, Plato and Their Successors. London.Google Scholar
Warren, J. (2013). ‘Gods and Men in Xenophanes’. In Politeia in Greek and Roman Philosophy, ed. Harte, V. and Lane, M.. Cambridge: 294–312.Google Scholar
Webb, R. (2009). Ekphrasis, Imagination and Persuasion in Ancient Rhetorical Theory and Practice. Farnham.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1947). The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. Translated by A. M. Henderson and T. Parsons. Oxford. Originally published in Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, Tübingen, 1922: 1–180.Google Scholar
Weil, H. (1862). ‘Über Spuren strophischer Composition bei den alten griechischen Elegikern’. RhM 17: 1–13.Google Scholar
West, M. L. (1981). ‘The Singing of Homer and the Modes of Early Greek Music’. JHS 101: 113–29.Google Scholar
West, M. L. (1992). Iambi et elegi graeci ante Alexandrum cantati, Vol. ii. 2nd ed. Oxford.Google Scholar
West, M. L. (2003a). Homeric Hymns: with Homeric Apocrypha and Lives of Homer. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
West, M. L. (2003b). Greek Epic Fragments: From the Seventh to the Fifth Centuries bc. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
West, M. L. (2011). ‘Rhapsodes’. In The Homer Encyclopedia, ed. Finkelberg, M.. Oxford.Google Scholar
Willi, A. (2003). The Languages of Aristophanes: Aspects of Linguistic Variation in Classical Attic Greek. Oxford.Google Scholar
Willi, A. (2008). Sikelismos: Sprache, Literatur und Gesellschaft im griechischen Sizilien (8.–5. Jh. v. Chr.). Basel.Google Scholar
Williams, B. (2006). The Sense of the Past: Essays in the History of Philosophy. ed. Burnyeat, M.. Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
Wöhrle, G. (1993). ‘War Parmenides ein schlechter Dichter? Oder: Zur Form der Wissensvermittlung in der frühgriechischen Philosophie’. In Vermittlung und Tradierung von Wissen in der griechischen Kultur, ed. Kullmann, W. and Althoff, J., Tübingen: 167–80.Google Scholar
Wolfsdorf, D. (2009). ‘Empedocles and His Ancient Readers on Desire and Pleasure’. OSAPh 36: 1–71.Google Scholar
Wordsworth, W., and Coleridge, S. T. (2005). Lyrical Ballads. ed. Brett, R. L. and Jones, A. R. with an introduction by N. Roe. Abingdon. Originally published London, 1798.Google Scholar
Wright, M. R. (1998). ‘Philosopher Poets: Parmenides and Empedocles’. In Form and Content in Didactic Poetry, ed. Atherton, C.. Bari: 1–22.Google Scholar
Yunis, H. (ed.) (2003). Written Texts and the Rise of Literate Culture in Ancient Greece. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Zuntz, G. (1971). Persephone: Three Studies in Religion and Thought in Magna Graecia. Oxford.Google Scholar