Book contents
- Playing and Playgoing in Early Modern England
- Playing and Playgoing in Early Modern England
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Illustrations
- Notes on Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- A Note on the Text
- Introduction
- Part I Players
- Part II Playgoers
- Chapter 5 Playgoing, Apprenticeship, and Profit: Francis Quicksilver, Goldsmith, and Richard Meighen, Stationer
- Chapter 6 Rethinking Early Modern Playgoing, Pleasure, and Judgement
- Chapter 7 ‘Art Hath an Enemie Cal’d Ignorance’: The Prodigal Industry of Early Modern Playwrighting
- Chapter 8 Early Modern Drama Out of Order: Chronology, Originality, and Audience Expectations
- Part III Playhouses
- Bibliography
- Index
Chapter 7 - ‘Art Hath an Enemie Cal’d Ignorance’: The Prodigal Industry of Early Modern Playwrighting
from Part II - Playgoers
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 March 2022
- Playing and Playgoing in Early Modern England
- Playing and Playgoing in Early Modern England
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Illustrations
- Notes on Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- A Note on the Text
- Introduction
- Part I Players
- Part II Playgoers
- Chapter 5 Playgoing, Apprenticeship, and Profit: Francis Quicksilver, Goldsmith, and Richard Meighen, Stationer
- Chapter 6 Rethinking Early Modern Playgoing, Pleasure, and Judgement
- Chapter 7 ‘Art Hath an Enemie Cal’d Ignorance’: The Prodigal Industry of Early Modern Playwrighting
- Chapter 8 Early Modern Drama Out of Order: Chronology, Originality, and Audience Expectations
- Part III Playhouses
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
In this essay I argue that early modern plays regularly failed in the theatre, indeed that early modern plays were built to fail. In making this argument I push back against the familiar idea that the early modern theatre was an “industry”: an essentially efficient commercial undertaking, governed by a set of conventionalized, rationalized practices, in which the product was carefully calibrated to the tastes of the consumer. Against the “industrial” view of early modern drama I attempt to oppose an “artistic” view, in which dramatists’ concern with audience response is primarily rhetorical—a displaced way of articulating a commitment to formal complexity and an indifference to the limitations that the commercial context might seem to make inevitable. The argument encompasses a wide range of examples, including plays by Jonson, Dekker, Webster, and Fletcher; it concludes with a discussion of one of Shakespeare’s greatest failures, the final scene of Winter’s Tale.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Playing and Playgoing in Early Modern EnglandActor, Audience and Performance, pp. 142 - 160Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022