Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T16:38:31.530Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2021

John H. Goldthorpe
John H. Goldthorpe
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Pioneers of Sociological Science
Statistical Foundations and the Theory of Action
 , pp. 211 - 236
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, A. (1999). Department and Discipline: Chicago Sociology at One Hundred. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Abbott, A. and Gaziano, E. (1995). ‘Transition and Tradition: Departmental Faculty in the Era of the Second Chicago School’, in Fine, G. A., ed., A Second Chicago School? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Abrams, P. (1968). The Origins of British Sociology: 1834–1914. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Allen, R. G. D. and George, R. F. (1957). ‘Professor Sir Arthur Lyon Bowley: November 6th 1869–January 21st 1957’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 120: 236–41.Google Scholar
Arbuthnot, J. (1710). ‘An Argument for Divine Providence, Taken from the Constant Regularity Observed in the Births of Both Sexes’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 27: 186–90.Google Scholar
Armitage, A. (1966). Edmond Halley. London: Nelson.Google Scholar
Aron, R. (1936). La sociologie allemande contemporaine. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Aubrey, J. (1898). Brief Lives, ed. Clark, A.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bannister, R. C. (1987). Sociology and Scientism: The American Quest for Objectivity, 1880–1940. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, H. E. (1948). An Introduction to the History of Sociology. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Bearman, P. (2012). ‘On Analytical Sociology’, Sociologica, DOI:10.2383/36859.Google Scholar
Bearman, P., Moody, J. and Stovel, K. (2004). ‘Chains of Affection: The Structure of Adolescent Romantic and Sexual Networks’, American Journal of Sociology, 110: 44–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, G. S. (1976). The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, D. (1973). The Coming of Post-Industrial Society. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Benini, R. (1906). Principii di statistica metodologica. Torino: Tipografico-Editrice Torinese.Google Scholar
Berelson, B. R., Lazarsfeld, P. F. and McPhee, W. N. (1954). Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Berk, R. A. (2004). Regression Analysis: A Constructive Critique. Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernardi, F. and Ballarino, G., eds. (2016). Education, Occupation and Social Origin. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Bernardi, F. and Cebolla-Boado, H. (2014). ‘Previous School Results and Social Background: Compensation and Imperfect Information in Educational Transitions’, European Sociological Review, 30: 207–17.Google Scholar
Bernardi, F., Chakhaia, L. and Leopold, L. (2017). ‘Sing Me a Song with Statistical Significance: The (Mis)use of Statistical Significance Testing in European Sociological Research’, European Sociological Review, 33: 1–29.Google Scholar
Bernert, C. (1983). ‘The Career of Causal Analysis in American Sociology’, British Journal of Sociology, 24: 230–54.Google Scholar
Biggs, M. (2009). ‘Self-Fulfilling Prophecies’, in Hedström, P. and Bearman, P., eds., Analytical Sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blalock, H. (1961). Causal Inferences in Nonexperimental Research. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Blau, P. M. (1990). ‘Structural Opportunities and Constraints: Merton’s Contribution to General Theory’, in Clark, J., Modgil, C. and Modgil, S., eds., Robert K. Merton: Consensus and Controversy. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Blau, P. M. and Duncan, O. D. (1967). The American Occupational Structure. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Blumer, H. (1931). ‘Science without Concepts’, American Journal of Sociology, 36: 515–33.Google Scholar
Blumer, H. (1939). Critiques of Research in the Social Sciences: An Appraisal of Thomas and Znaniecki’s ‘The Polish Peasant in Europe and America’. New York: Social Science Research Council.Google Scholar
Blumer, H. (1948). ‘Public Opinion and Public Opinion Polling’, American Sociological Review, 13: 542–9.Google Scholar
Blumer, H. (1955). ‘Sociological Analysis and the “Variable”’, American Sociological Review, 21: 683–90.Google Scholar
Booth, C. (1892–7). Life and Labour of the People of London, 2nd ed. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Booth, C. (1894). The Aged Poor in England and Wales: Conditions. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Boudon, R. (1967). L’analyse mathématique des faits sociaux. Paris: Plon.Google Scholar
Boudon, R. (1971/1981). The Crisis of Sociology. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Boudon, R. (1973a/1974). Education, Opportunity and Social Inequality. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Boudon, R. (1973b). Mathematical Structures of Social Mobility. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Boudon, R. (1976). ‘Comment on Hauser’s Review of Education, Opportunity and Social Inequality’, American Journal of Sociology, 81: 1175–87.Google Scholar
Boudon, R. (1977/1982). The Unintended Consequences of Social Action. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boudon, R. (1979). ‘Generating Models as a Research Strategy’, in Merton, R. K., Coleman, J. S. and Rossi, P. H., eds., Qualitative and Quantitative Social Research: Papers in Honor of Paul F. Lazarsfeld. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Boudon, R. (1986/1989). The Analysis of Ideology. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Boudon, R. (1989). ‘Subjective Rationality and the Explanation of Social Behavior’, Rationality and Society, 1: 173–96.Google Scholar
Boudon, R. (1990a). ‘Individualism and Holism in the Social Sciences’, in Birnbaum, P. and Leca, J., eds., Individualism: Theories and Methods. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Boudon, R. (1990b/1994). The Art of Self-Persuasion. London: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Boudon, R. (1993). ‘Introduction’, in Boudon, R., ed., Paul F. Lazarsfeld: On Social Research and Its Language. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Boudon, R. (1995). Le juste et le vrai: études sur l’objectivité des valeurs et de la connaissance. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Boudon, R. (1996). ‘The Cognitivist Model: A Generalized “Rational Choice” Model’, Rationality and Society, 8: 123–50.Google Scholar
Boudon, R. (1998). Études sur les sociologues classiques. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Boudon, R. (1999/2001). The Origin of Values. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Boudon, R. (2002a). Les méthodes en sociologie, 12th ed. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boudon, R. (2002b). ‘Sociology That Really Matters’, European Sociological Review, 18: 371–8.Google Scholar
Boudon, R. (2003a). Raisons, bonnes raisons. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Boudon, R. (2003b). ‘La conversion de Coleman à la théorie du choix rationnel: impressions et conjectures’, Revue française de sociologie, 44: 389–98.Google Scholar
Boudon, R. (2005). The Poverty of Relativism. Oxford: Bardwell Press.Google Scholar
Boudon, R. (2009). ‘Why I Became a Sociologist’, in Cherkaoui, M. and Hamilton, P., eds., Raymond Boudon: A Life in Sociology. Oxford: Bardwell Press.Google Scholar
Boudon, R. (2010). La sociologie comme science. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
Boudon, R. (2011). La rationalité. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Boudon, R. (2012). ‘“Analytical Sociology” and the Explanation of Beliefs’, Revue europénne des sciences sociales’, 50: 1–17.Google Scholar
Boudon, R. with Leroux, R. (2003). Y a-t-il encore une sociologie? Paris: Odile Jacob.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1979/1984). Distinction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. and Passeron, J.-C. (1970/1977). Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Bowley, A. L. (1901). Elements of Statistics. London: P. S. King.Google Scholar
Bowley, A. L. (1906). ‘Presidential Address, British Association, Section F’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 69: 540–58.Google Scholar
Bowley, A. L. (1915). The Nature and Purpose of the Measurement of Social Phenomena. London: P. S. King.Google Scholar
Bowley, A. L. (1926). ‘Measurement of the Precision Attained in Sampling’, Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute, 22, Supplement to Liv. 1: 6–62.Google Scholar
Bowley, A. L. and Burnett-Hurst, A. R. (1915). Livelihood and Poverty. London: Bell.Google Scholar
Bowley, A. L. and Hogg, M. H. (1925). Has Poverty Diminished? London: P. S. King.Google Scholar
Breen, R. (2009). ‘Formal Theory in the Social Sciences’, in Hedström, P. and Wittrock, B., eds., Frontiers of Sociology. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Breen, R. and Goldthorpe, J. H. (1997). ‘Explaining Educational Differentials: Towards a Formal Rational Action Theory’, Rationality and Society, 9: 275–305.Google Scholar
Bruch, E. E. (2014). ‘How Population Structure Shapes Neighbourhood Segregation’, American Journal of Sociology, 119: 1221–78.Google Scholar
Bruch, E. E. and Mare, R. D. (2006). ‘Neighborhood Choice and Neighborhood Change’, American Journal of Sociology, 112: 667–709.Google Scholar
Bruun, H. H. and Whimster, S., eds. (2012). Max Weber: Collected Methodological Writings. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Buis, M. L. (2012). ‘The Composition of Family Background: The Influence of Economic and Cultural Resources of both Parents on the Offspring’s Educational Attainment in the Netherlands between 1939 and 1991’, European Sociological Review, 29: 593–602.Google Scholar
Bukodi, E. and Goldthorpe, J. H. (2013). ‘Decomposing “Social Origins”: The Effects of Parents’ Class, Status, and Education on the Educational Attainment of their Children’, European Sociological Review, 29: 1024–39.Google Scholar
Bukodi, E. and Goldthorpe, J. H. (2016). ‘Educational Attainment – Relative or Absolute – as a Mediator of Intergenerational Class Mobility in Britain’, Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 43: 5–15.Google Scholar
Bukodi, E. and Goldthorpe, J. H. (2018). Social Mobility and Education in Britain: Research, Politics and Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bukodi, E., Dex, S. and Goldthorpe, J. H. (2011). ‘The Conceptualisation and Measurement of Occupational Hierarchies: A Review, a Proposal and some Illustrative Analyses’, Quality and Quantity, 45: 623–39.Google Scholar
Bukodi, E., Goldthorpe, J. H. and Zhao, Y. (2020). ‘Primary and Secondary Effects of Social Origins on Educational Attainment: New Findings for England’. SocArXiv. September 20. DOI:10.31235/osf.io/chvz7.Google Scholar
Bulmer, M. (1984). The Chicago School of Sociology. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Butterfield, H. (1931). The Whig Interpretation of History. London: Bell.Google Scholar
Cain, G. G. and Watts, H. W. (1970). ‘Problems in Making Policy Inferences from the Coleman Report’, American Sociological Review, 35: 228–42.Google Scholar
Camic, C. and Xie, Y. (1994). ‘The Statistical Turn in American Social Science: Columbia University, 1890 to 1915’, American Sociological Review, 59: 773–805.Google Scholar
Campbell, C. (1982). ‘A Dubious Distinction? An Inquiry into the Value and Use of Merton’s Concepts of Manifest and Latent Function’, American Sociological Review, 47: 29–44.Google Scholar
Candolle, A. de (1873). Histoire des sciences et des savants depuis deux siècles. Geneva: H. Georg.Google Scholar
Cassedy, J. H. (1973). Mortality in Pre-industrial Times: The Contemporary Verdict. Boston: Gregg.Google Scholar
Chessa, F. (1911). La trasmissione ereditaria delle professioni. Torino: Fratelli Bocca.Google Scholar
Chowdry, H. et al. (2013). ‘Widening Participation in Higher Education: Analysis Using Linked Administrative Data’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 176: 431–57.Google Scholar
Clark, J., ed. (1996). James S. Coleman. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Cocker, E. (1702). Cocker’s Arithmetic. London: Hawkins.Google Scholar
Cohen, I. B. (2005). The Triumph of Numbers. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Cole, S. (1994). ‘Why Sociology Doesn’t Make Progress Like the Natural Sciences’, Sociological Forum, 9: 133–54.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. S. (1961). The Adolescent Society. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. S. (1964). Introduction to Mathematical Sociology. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. S. (1970). ‘Reply to Cain and Watts’, American Sociological Review, 35: 242–9.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. S. (1980). ‘Paul F. Lazarsfeld: The Substance and Style of His Work’, in Merton, R. K. and Riley, M. W., eds., Sociological Traditions from Generation to Generation. Norwood: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. S. (1986a). Individual Interests and Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. S. (1986b). ‘Social Theory, Social Research, and a Theory of Action’, American Journal of Sociology, 91: 1309–35.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. S. (1987). ‘Microfoundations and Macrosocial Behaviour’, in Alexander, J., Giesen, B., Münch, R. and Smelser, N., eds., The Micro–Macro Link. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. S. (1989). ‘Weber and the Protestant Ethic: A Comment on Hernes’, Rationality and Society, 1: 291–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, J. S. (1990a). ‘Columbia in the 1950s’, in Berger, B. M., ed., Authors of Their Own Lives. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. S. (1990b). Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. S. (1993). ‘The Impact of Gary Becker’s Work on Sociology’, Acta Sociologica, 36: 169–78.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. S. (1996). ‘A Vision for Sociology’, in Clark, J., ed., James S. Coleman. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. S. et al. (1966). Equality of Educational Opportunity. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. S., Hoffer, T. and Kilgore, S. (1982). High School Achievement: Public, Catholic and Private Schools. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. S., Katz, E. and Menzel, H. (1957). ‘The Diffusion of an Innovation among Physicians’, Sociometry, 20: 253–70.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. S., Katz, E. and Menzel, H. (1966). Medical Innovation. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. S., Kelly, S. and Moore, J. (1975). Trends in School Segregation, 1968–73, Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar
Coleman, Z. A. (1996). ‘Transcripts of Drafts for a Concluding Chapter by James S. Coleman with a Commentary by Zdzislawa Coleman: Contexts of Transcripts 1, 2 and 3’, Appendix 2 in Clark, J., ed., James S. Coleman, London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Collini, S. (1979). Liberalism and Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Comte, A. (1830–42/1908). Cours de philosophie positive. Paris: Schleicher Frères.Google Scholar
Converse, J. M. (1987). Survey Research in the United States: Roots and Emergence 1890–1960. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cooley, C. H. (1918). Social Process. New York: Charles Scribner.Google Scholar
Coser, L. A. and Nisbet, R. (1975). ‘Merton and the Contemporary Mind: An Affectionate Dialogue’, in Coser, L. A., ed., The Idea of Social Structure: Papers in Honor of Robert K. Merton. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Cox, D. R. (1958). ‘The Regression Analysis of Binary Sequences’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 20: 215–42.Google Scholar
Cox, D. R. (1970). The Analysis of Binary Data. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Cox, D. R., Kartsonaki, C. and Keogh, R. H. (2018). ‘Big Data: Some Statistical Issues’, Statistics and Probability Letters, 136: 111–15.Google Scholar
Crothers, C. (1998). ‘The Relation between the Logics of Merton’s Theory and Lazarsfeld’s Methodology: Their Intellectual Compatibility and Research Partnership’, in Lautman, J. and Lécuyer, B.-P, eds., Paul Lazarsfeld (1901–1976): La sociologie de Vienne à New York. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Dale, A. and Katz, S. (2011). Arthur L. Bowley: A Pioneer in Modern Statistics and Economics. London: World Scientific Publishing.Google Scholar
Daston, L. (1990). ‘The Domestication of Risk: Mathematical Probability and Insurance 1650–1830’, in Krüger, L., Daston, L. and Heidelberger, M., eds., The Probabilistic Revolution, vol. 1. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Davenant, C. (1698). Discourses on the Publick Revenues, and on the Trade of England, 2 vols. London: Knapton.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. (1980). Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Demeulenaere, P., ed. (2011a). Analytical Sociology and Social Mechanisms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Demeulenaere, P. (2011b). ‘Introduction’, in Demeulenaere, P., ed., Analytical Sociology and Social Mechanisms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (2003). Freedom Evolves. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Denis, D. J. and Legerski, J. (2006). ‘Causal Modelling and the Origins of Path Analysis’, Theory and Science, 7: 1–19.Google Scholar
Desrosières, A. (1993/1998). The Politics of Large Numbers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Desrosières, A. (1997). ‘Quetelet et la sociologie quantitative: du piédestal à l’oubli’, in Actualité et universalité de la pensée scientifique d’Adolphe Quetelet, Brussels: Académie Royale de Belgique.Google Scholar
Diamond, M. and Stone, M. (1981). ‘Nightingale on Quetelet’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 144, Part 1: 66–79.Google Scholar
DiPrete, T. and Eirich, G. M. (2006). ‘Cumulative Advantage as a Mechanism for Inequality: A Review of Theoretical and Empirical Developments’, Annual Review of Sociology, 32: 271–97.Google Scholar
Donnelly, K. (2015). Adolphe Quetelet, Social Physics and the Average Men of Science, 1796–1874. London: Pickering and Chatto.Google Scholar
Duncan, B. and Duncan, O. D. (1978). Sex Typing and Social Roles: A Research Report. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Duncan, O. D. (1959). ‘An Appreciation of William Fielding Ogburn’, Technology and Culture, 1: 94–9.Google Scholar
Duncan, O. D. (1961). ‘A Socioeconomic Index for All Occupations’, in Reiss, A. J., ed., Occupations and Social Status. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar
Duncan, O. D. (1969). ‘Path Analysis: Sociological Examples’, American Journal of Sociology, 72: 1–16.Google Scholar
Duncan, O. D. (1974). ‘Autobiography for the National Academy of Sciences’, typescript. US National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Duncan, O. D. (1975). Introduction to Structural Equation Models. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Duncan, O. D. (1981). ‘A Ceremony of Research Reports’, Contemporary Sociology, 10: 357–61.Google Scholar
Duncan, O. D. (1982). ‘Statistical Methods for Categorical Data’, American Journal of Sociology, 87: 957–64.Google Scholar
Duncan, O. D. (1984). Notes on Social Measurement. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Duncan, O. D. (1992). ‘What If?’, Contemporary Sociology, 21: 667–8.Google Scholar
Duncan, O. D. and Duncan, B. (1957). The Negro Population of Chicago. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Duncan, O. D. and Hodge, R. W. (1963). ‘Education and Occupational Mobility: A Regression Analysis’, American Journal of Sociology, 68: 629–44.Google Scholar
Duncan, O. D., Featherman, D. L. and Duncan, B. (1972). Socioeconomic Background and Attainment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dunlop, J. T., Harbison, F. H., Kerr, C. and Myers, C. A. (1975). Industrialism and Industrial Man Reconsidered. Princeton: Inter-University Study of Human Resources in National Development.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E. (1897/1952). Suicide. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Elderton, E. M., with Pearson, K. (1910). A First Study of the Influence of Parental Alcoholism on the Physique and Ability of the Offspring. London: Dulay.Google Scholar
Eldridge, J. E. T., ed. (1973). Max Weber: The Interpretation of Social Reality. London: Nelson.Google Scholar
Elster, J. (1990). ‘Merton’s Functionalism and the Unintended Consequences of Action’, in Clark, J., Modgil, C. and Modgil, S., eds., Robert K. Merton: Consensus and Controversy. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Elster, J. (1997). ‘More than Enough’, University of Chicago Law Review, 64: 748–64.Google Scholar
Elster, J. (1998). ‘A Plea for Mechanisms’, in Hedström, P. and Swedberg, R., eds., Social Mechanisms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elster, J. (2007). Explaining Social Behaviour: More Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elster, J. (2009). ‘Emotions’, in Hedström, P. and Bearman, P., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Elster, J. (2011). ‘The Two Great Fears of 1789’, Social Science Information, 50: 317–29.Google Scholar
Endres, A. M. (1985). ‘The Functions of Numerical Data in the Writings of Graunt, Petty and Davenant’, History of Political Economy, 17: 245–65.Google Scholar
Epstein, J. M. (2006). Generative Social Science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Erikson, R. and Goldthorpe, J. H. (1992). The Constant Flux: A Study of Class Mobility in Industrial Societies. Oxford: Clarendon Press Oxford.Google Scholar
Farr, J. (1983). ‘Popper’s Hermeneutics’, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 13: 157–76.Google Scholar
Featherman, D. L. and Hauser, R. M. (1978). Opportunity and Change. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Featherman, D. L., Jones, F. L. and Hauser, R. M. (1975). ‘Assumptions of Social Mobility Research in the US: The Case of Occupational Status’, Social Science Research, 4: 329–60.Google Scholar
Flemmen, M. P., Jarness, V. and Rosenlund, L. (2019). ‘Class and Status: On the Misconstrual of the Conceptual Distinction and a Neo-Bourdieusian Alternative’, British Journal of Sociology, 70: 816–66.Google Scholar
Freedman, D. A. (1992). ‘As Others See Us: A Case Study in Path Analysis’, in Shaffer, J. P., ed., The Role of Models in Nonexperimental Social Science: Two Debates. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association and American Statistical Association.Google Scholar
Freedman, D. A. (1997). ‘From Association to Causation via Regression’, in McKim, V. R. and Turner, S. P., eds., Causality in Crisis? Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press.Google Scholar
Freedman, D. A. (2009). Statistical Models: Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Freedman, D. A. (2010). Statistical Models and Causal Inference: A Dialogue with the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Freeman, L. C. (2004). The Development of Social Network Analysis. Vancouver: Empirical Press.Google Scholar
Galton, F. 1869/1892. Hereditary Genius. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Galton, F. (1874). English Men of Science: Their Nature and Nurture. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Galton, F. (1889a). Natural Inheritance. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Galton, F. (1889b). ‘On a Method of Investigating the Development of Institutions: Applied to Laws of Marriage and Descent’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 18: 245–56, 261–9.Google Scholar
Galton, F. (1890). ‘Kinship and Correlation’, North American Review, 150: 419–31.Google Scholar
Galton, F. (1904). ‘Eugenics: Its Definition, Scope and Aims’, Sociological Papers, 1: 45–50, 78–9.Google Scholar
Galton, F. (1905). ‘Eugenics’, Sociological Papers, 2: 1–17.Google Scholar
Galton, F. (1909). ‘The Possible Improvement of the Human Breed’ in Essays in Eugenics. London: The Eugenics Education Society.Google Scholar
Gambetta, D. (2009). ‘Signalling’, in Hedström, P. and Bearman, P., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gangl, M. (2018). ‘Continuity and Change at ESR: A Letter from the Editor’, European Sociological Review, 34: 1–5.Google Scholar
Gerth, H. H. and Mills, C. W. (1970). From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Ghosh, P. (2009). Review of Radkau (2009), Times Literary Supplement, June 19.Google Scholar
Ghosh, P. (2014). Max Weber and the Protestant Ethic: Twin Histories. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1990). ‘R. K. Merton on Structural Analysis’, in Clark, J., Modgil, C. and Modgil, S., eds., Robert K. Merton: Consensus and Controversy. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, G. (2008). Rationality for Mortals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gigerenzer, G., Swijtink, Z., Porter, T., Daston, L., Beatty, J. and Krüger, L. (1989). The Empire of Chance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gillham, N. W. (2001). Sir Francis Galton: From African Exploration to the Birth of Eugenics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gillispie, C. C. (1963). ‘Intellectual Factors in the Background of Analysis by Probabilities’, in Crombie, A. C., ed. Scientific Change. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gini, C. (1912). I fattori demografici dell’evoluzione delle nazione. Torino: Fratelli Bocca.Google Scholar
Gini, C. and Galvani, L. (1929). ‘Di una applicazione del metodo rappresentativo all’ultimo censimento de la population italiano (1 dicembri, 1921)’, Annali di Statistica, Series 6, 4: 1–107.Google Scholar
Ginsberg, M. (1932/1962). ‘The Claims of Eugenics’, in Essays in Sociology and Social Philosophy, vol. 2. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Girard, A. and Bastide, H. (1963). ‘La stratification sociale et la démocratisation de l’enseignement’, Population, 18: 435–72.Google Scholar
Girard, A., Bastide, H. and Pourcher, G. (1963). ‘Enquête nationale sur l’entrée en sixième et la démocratisation de l’enseignement’, Population, 18: 7–48.Google Scholar
Glass, D. V. (1963). ‘John Graunt and His Natural and Political Observations’, Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 159: 2–32.Google Scholar
Glass, D. V. and Hall, J. R. (1954). ‘Education and Social Mobility’, in Glass, D. V., ed., Social Mobility in Britain. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Goldfrank, W. (1972). ‘Reappraising Le Play’, in Oberschall, A., ed., The Establishment of Empirical Sociology. New York: Harper Row.Google Scholar
Goldman, L. (2019). ‘Victorians and Numbers: Statistics and Social Science in Nineteenth-Century Britain’, in Panayotova, P., ed., The History of Sociology in Britain: New Research and Revaluation. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Goldthorpe, J. H. (1980/1987). Social Mobility and Class Structure in Modern Britain. Oxford: Clarendon Press Oxford.Google Scholar
Goldthorpe, J. H. (2007). On Sociology, 2nd ed., 2 vols. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Goldthorpe, J. H. (2016). Sociology as a Population Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goldthorpe, J. H. (2019). ‘Sociology and Statistics in Britain: The Strange History of Social Mobility Research’, in Panayotova, P., ed., The History of Sociology in Britain: New Research and Revaluation. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Goodman, L. A. (1968). ‘The Analysis of Cross-Classified Data: Independence, Quasi-Independence, and Interactions in Tables with or without Missing Entries’, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 63: 1091–131.Google Scholar
Goodman, L. A. (1969). ‘How to Ransack Social Mobility Tables and Other Kinds of Cross-Classification Tables’, American Journal of Sociology, 75: 1–40.Google Scholar
Goodman, L. A. (1979). ‘The Analysis of Qualitative Variables Using More Parsimonious Quasi-independence Models, Scaling Models, and Latent Structures’, in Merton, R. K., Coleman, J. S. and Rossi, P. H., eds., Qualitative and Quantitative Social Research: Papers in Honor of Paul F. Lazarsfeld. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Goodman, L. A. (2007). ‘Otis Dudley Duncan: Quantitative Sociologist par excellence: Path Analysis, Loglinear Models, and Rasch Models’, Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 25: 129–39.Google Scholar
Graunt, J. (1662). Natural and Political Observations Mentioned in a Following Index and Made upon the Bills of Mortality. London: Martyn, Allestry and Dicas. Facsimile in P. Laslett, ed., The Earliest Classics. Farnborough: Gregg International, 1973.Google Scholar
Greenwood, M. (1970). ‘Medical Statistics from Graunt to Farr’, in Pearson, E. S. and Kendall, M. G., eds., Studies in the History of Statistics and Probability. London: Griffin.Google Scholar
Hacking, I. (1990). The Taming of Chance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Halbwachs, M. (1912). La théorie de l’homme moyen. Essai sur Quetelet et la statistique. Paris: Alcan.Google Scholar
Haldane, J. B. S. (1970). ‘Karl Pearson, 1857–1936’, in Pearson, E. S. and Kendall, M. G., eds., Studies in the History of Statistics and Probability. London: Griffin.Google Scholar
Halley, E. (1693). ‘An Estimate of the Degrees of Mortality of Mankind, Drawn from Curious Tables of the Births and Funerals of the City of Breslaw’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, January. Facsimile in Cassedy, J., ed., Mortality in Pre-Industrial Times, the Contemporary Verdict. Farnborough: Gregg International. 1973.Google Scholar
Halsey, A. H. (1977). ‘Sociology as Political Arithmetic’, British Journal of Sociology, 45: 427–44.Google Scholar
Hammersley, M. (1989). The Dilemma of Qualitative Method: Herbert Blumer and the Chicago Tradition. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hankins, F. H. (1908). Adolphe Quetelet as Statistician. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Hanushek, E. (1972). Education and Race. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Press.Google Scholar
Hauser, P. M. and Duncan, O. D. (1959). The Study of Population. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hauser, R. M. (1976). ‘Review Essay: On Boudon’s Model of Social Mobility’, American Journal of Sociology, 81: 911–28.Google Scholar
Hauser, R. M. (1978). ‘A Structural Model of the Mobility Table’, Social Forces, 56: 919–53.Google Scholar
Hauser, R. M. (2007). ‘The Scientific Legacy of Otis Dudley Duncan’, Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 25: 97–100.Google Scholar
Hauser, R. M. (2017). ‘A Life in Sociology’, Annual Review of Sociology, 43: 1–8.Google Scholar
Hauser, R. M. and Warren, J. R. (1997). ‘Socioeconomic Indexes for Occupations: A Review, Update and Critique’, Sociological Methodology, 27: 177–298.Google Scholar
Hauser, R. M., Koffel, J. N., Travis, H. P. and Dickinson, P. J. (1975). ‘Temporal Change in Occupational Mobility: Evidence for Men in the United States’, American Sociological Review 40: 279–97.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. A. von (1937). ‘Economics and Knowledge’, Economica, 4: 33–54.Google Scholar
Heath, J. (2015). ‘Methodological Individualism’, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.Stanford.edu/archives/spr2015/.Google Scholar
Heckathorn, D. and Cameron, C. (2017). ‘Network Sampling: From Snowball and Multiplicity to Respondent-Driven Sampling’, Annual Review of Sociology, 43: 1101–19.Google Scholar
Heckman, J. J. (1996). ‘Themes in Coleman’s Research’, Postscript 1 to J. J. Heckman and D. Neal, ‘Coleman’s Contributions to Education: Theory, Research Styles and Empirical Research’, in Clark, J., ed., James S. Coleman. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Heckman, J. J. and Neal, D. (1996). ‘Coleman’s Contributions to Education: Theory, Research Styles and Empirical Research’, in Clark, J., ed., James S. Coleman. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Hedström, P. (2009). ‘The Analytical Turn in Sociology’, in Hedström, P. and Wittrock, B., eds., Frontiers of Sociology. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Hedström, P. and Swedberg, R. (1998). Social Mechanisms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hedström, P. and Bearman, P., eds. (2009a). The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hedström, P. and Bearman, P. (2009b). ‘What Is Analytical Sociology All About? An Introductory Essay’, in Hedström, P. and Bearman, P., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hedström, P. and Udehn, L. (2009). ‘Analytical Sociology and Theories of the Middle Range’, in Hedström, P. and Bearman, P., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Analytical Sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hedström, P. and Ylikoski, , P. (2014). ‘Analytical Sociology and Rational-Choice Theory’, in Manzo, G., ed., Analytical Sociology: Actions and Networks. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Hennis, W. (1987). ‘A Science of Man: Max Weber and the Political Economy of the German Historical School’, in Mommsen, W. J. and Osterhammel, J., eds., Max Weber and His Contemporaries. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Hennock, E. P. (1987). ‘The Measurement of Urban Poverty: From the Metropolis to the Nation’, Economic History Review, 40: 206–27.Google Scholar
Hennock, E. P. (1991). ‘Concepts of Poverty in the British Social Surveys from Charles Booth to Arthur Bowley’, in Bulmer, M., Bales, K. and Sklar, K. K., eds., The Social Survey in Historical Perspective 1880–1940. Cambridge; Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hepple, L. W. (2001). ‘Multiple Regression and Spatial Policy Analysis: George Udny Yule and the Origins of Statistical Social Science’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 19: 385–407.Google Scholar
Hernes, G. (1989). ‘The Logic of the Protestant Ethic’, Rationality and Society, 1: 123–62.Google Scholar
Hernes, G. (1989). ‘Response to Coleman’, Rationality and Society, 1: 295–300.Google Scholar
Hernes, G. (1992). ‘We Are Smarter Than We Think’, Rationality and Society, 4: 421–36.Google Scholar
Hirsch, F. (1977). Social Limits to Growth. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Hirsch, F. and Goldthorpe, J. H. eds. (1978). The Political Economy of Inflation. Oxford: Martin Robertson.Google Scholar
Hobhouse, L. T., Wheeler, G. C. and Ginsberg, M. (1915). The Material Culture and Social Institutions of the Simpler Peoples. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Hogben, L. (1938). ‘Prolegomena to Political Arithmetic’, in Hogben, L., ed., Political Arithmetic: A Symposium of Population Studies. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Hollis, M. (1977). Models of Man. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Homans, G. C. (1958). ‘Social Behavior as Exchange’, American Journal of Sociology, 63: 597–606.Google Scholar
Homans, G. C. (1961). Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Hope, K. (1984). As Others See Us: Schooling and Social Mobility in Scotland and the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hope, K. (1992). ‘Barren Theory or Petty Craft? A Response to Professor Freedman’, in Shaffer, J. P., ed., The Role of Models in Nonexperimental Social Science: Two Debates. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association and American Statistical Association.Google Scholar
Hoppit, J. (1996). ‘Political Arithmetic in Eighteenth Century England’, Economic History Review, 49: 516–40.Google Scholar
Horton, R. (1993). Patterns of Thought in Africa and the West. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hout, M. (1983). Mobility Tables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Hyman, H. (1953). ‘The Value Systems of Different Classes: A Social Psychological Contribution to the Analysis of Stratification’, in Bendix, R. and Lipset, S. M., eds., Class, Status and Power. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar
Illari, P. M., Russo, F. and Williamson, J. (2011). Causality in the Sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Innes, J. (2009). Inferior Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Isambert, F. (1998). ‘La méthodologie de Marienthal’, in Lautmann, J. and Lécuyer, B.-P., eds., Paul Lazarsfeld (1901–1976): La sociologue de Vienne à New York. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Jackson, M. V., ed. (2013). Determined to Succeed? Performance versus Choice in Educational Attainment. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, M. V., Erikson, R., Goldthorpe, J. H. and Yaish, M. (2007). ‘Primary and Secondary Effects in Class Differentials in Educational Attainment’, Acta Sociologica, 50: 211–29.Google Scholar
Jahoda, G. (2015). ‘Quetelet and the Emergence of the Behavioural Sciences’, Springerplus, 4: 473, DOI:10.1186/s40064-015-1261-7.Google Scholar
Jahoda, M. (1998). ‘Paul Felix Lazarsfeld in Vienna’, in Lautmann, J. and Lécuyer, B.-P., eds., Paul Lazarsfeld (1901–1976): La sociologue de Vienne à New York. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Jahoda, M., Lazarsfeld, P. F. and Zeisel, H. (1932/1972). Marienthal: The Sociology of an Unemployed Community. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.Google Scholar
Jarvie, I. C. (1964). The Revolution in Anthropology. New York: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Jencks, C. et al. (1972). Inequality. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Kalter, F. and Kroneberg, C. (2014). ‘Between Mechanism Talk and Mechanism Cult: New Emphases in Explanatory Sociology and Empirical Research’, Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 54: 91–115.Google Scholar
Kandel, D. B. (1996). ‘Coleman’s Contribution to Understanding Youth and Adolescence’, in Clark, J., ed., James S. Coleman. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Katz, E. and Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1955). Personal Influence. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar
Kendall, P. and Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1950). ‘Problems of Survey Analysis’, in Merton, R. K. and Lazarsfeld, P. F., eds., Continuities in Social Research: Studies in the Scope and Method of ‘The American Soldier’. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar
Kerr, C., Dunlop, J. T., Harbison, F. H. and Myers, C. A. (1960). Industrialism and Industrial Man. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Keuschnigg, M., Lovsjö, N. and Hedström, P. (2017). ‘Analytical Sociology and Computational Social Science’, Journal of Computational Social Science, DOI:10.1007/S42001-017-0006-5.Google Scholar
Kevles, D. J. (1995) In the Name of Eugenics, 2nd ed., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Keynes, J. M. (1910). Review of Elderton and Pearson (1910), Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 73: 769–73.Google Scholar
Keynes, J. M. (1910–11/1983). Economic Articles and Correspondence Academic, ed. Moggridge, D.. London: Macmillan and Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Keynes, J. M. (1921/1973). A Treatise on Probability. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Keynes, J. M. (1939). ‘Professor Tinbergen’s Method’, Economic Journal, 49: 558–68.Google Scholar
Kiaer, A. N. (1895–6). ‘Observations et expériences concernant des dénombrements représentatifs’, Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute, 9: 176–83.Google Scholar
Kiaer, A. N. (1897/1976). The Representative Method of Statistical Surveys. Oslo: Central Bureau of Statistics of Norway.Google Scholar
Kiaer, A. N. (1903). ‘Sur les méthodes représentatives ou typologiques’, Bulletin of the International Statistical institute, 13: 66–70.Google Scholar
Kilgore, S. B. (2016). ‘The Life and Times of James S. Coleman’, Education Next, 16: 1–9.Google Scholar
King, G. (1696). Natural and Political Observations and Conclusions upon the State and Condition of England. Unpublished. Facsimile in Laslett, P., ed., The Earliest Classics. Farnborough: Gregg International, 1973.Google Scholar
Koertge, N. (1975). ‘Popper’s Metaphysical Research Program for the Human Sciences’, Inquiry, 18: 437–62.Google Scholar
Koertge, N. (1979). ‘The Methodological Status of Popper’s Rationality Principle’, Theory and Decision, 18: 83–95.Google Scholar
Kolakowski, L. (1972). Positive Philosophy. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Kreager, P. (1988). ‘New Light on Graunt’, Population Studies, 42: 129–40.Google Scholar
Kreager, P. (2018). ‘The Emergence of Population’, in Hopwood, N., Flemming, R. and Kassell, L., eds., Reproduction: Antiquity to the Present Day. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Krüger, L., Gigerenzer, G. and Heidelberger, M., eds. (1987. The Probabilistic Revolution, vol. 1, Ideas in History. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Krüger, L., Gigerenzer, G. and Morgan, M., eds. (1987). The Probabilistic Revolution, vol. 2, Ideas in the Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kruskal, W. and Mosteller, F. (1980). ‘Representative Sampling IV: The History of the Concept in Statistics, 1895–1939’, International Statistical Review, 48: 169–95.Google Scholar
Kuha, J. and Mills, C. (2020). ‘On Group Comparisons with Logistic Regression Models’, Sociological Methods and Research, 49: 498–525.Google Scholar
Lapie, P. (1904). ‘Les effets sociaux de l’école’, Revue scientifique, 41–2: 6–12, 42–6.Google Scholar
Laplace, P. S. (1814). Essai philosophique sur les probabilités. Paris: Courcier.Google Scholar
Landau, D. and Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1962). ‘Adolphe Quetelet’, in Sills, D., ed., International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. New York: Macmillan and Free Press.Google Scholar
Laslett, B. (1991). ‘Biography as Historical Sociology: The Case of William Fielding Ogburn’, Theory and Society, 20: 511–38.Google Scholar
Laslett, P. (1972). ‘Introduction: The History of the Family’, in Laslett, P., ed., Household and Family in Past Time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Laslett, P. (1973). ‘Introduction’, in Laslett, P., ed., The Earliest Classics. Farnborough: Gregg International.Google Scholar
Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1927). Statistisches Praktikum für Psychologen und Lehrer. Jena: Gustav Fischer.Google Scholar
Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1931). Jugend und Beruf. Jena: Gustav Fischer.Google Scholar
Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1940). Radio and the Printed Page. New York: Duell.Google Scholar
Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1950a). ‘The Logical and Mathematical Foundation of Latent Structure Analysis’, in Stouffer et al. (1950).Google Scholar
Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1950b). ‘The Interpretation and Computation of some Latent Structures’, in Stouffer et al. (1950).Google Scholar
Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1955). ‘Interpretation of Statistical Relations as a Research Operation’, in Lazarsfeld, P. F. and Rosenberg, M., eds., The Language of Social Research. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar
Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1961). ‘Notes on the History of Quantification in Sociology – Trends, Sources and Problems’, Isis, 52: 277–33.Google Scholar
Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1968). ‘Survey Analysis: The Analysis of Attribute Data’, in Sills, D., ed., International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. New York: Macmillan and Free Press.Google Scholar
Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1972a). ‘The Algebra of Dichotomous Systems’, in Lazarsfeld, P. F., Pasanella, A. K. and Rosenberg, M., eds., Continuities in the Language of Social Research. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1972b). ‘Mutual Effects of Statistical Variables’, in Lazarsfeld, P. F., Pasanella, A. K. and Rosenberg, M., eds., Continuities in the Language of Social Research. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1972c). Qualitative Analysis: Historical and Critical Essays. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1975). ‘Working with Merton’, in Coser, L. A., ed., The Idea of Social Structure: Papers in Honor of Robert K. Merton. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Lazarsfeld, P. F., Berelson, B. and Gaudet, H. (1944/1948). The People’s Choice. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Lazarsfeld, P. F. and Henry, N. W. (1968). Latent Structure Analysis. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Lazarsfeld, P. F. and Menzel, H. (1972). ‘On the Relation between Individual and Collective Properties’, in Lazarsfeld, P. F., Pasanella, A. K. and Rosenberg, M., eds., Continuities in the Language of Social Research. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Lazarsfeld, P. F. and Oberschall, A. R. (1965). ‘Max Weber and Empirical Social Research’, American Sociological Review, 30: 179–99.Google Scholar
Lazarsfeld, P. F., Pasanella, A. K. and Rosenberg, M., eds. (1972). Continuities in the Language of Social Research. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Lazarsfeld, P. F. and Thielens, W. (1958). The Academic Mind. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar
Le Bon, G. (1895). Psychologie des foules. Paris: Alcan.Google Scholar
Le Play, F. (1877–9). Les ouvriers européens, 2nd ed. Paris: Alfred Mamé.Google Scholar
Levine, D. N. (1995). Visions of the Sociological Tradition. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Lewin, K. (1951). Field Theory in Social Science. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Lexis, W. (1874/1903). ‘Naturwissenschaft und Sozialwissenschaft’ in Abhandlungen zur Theorie der Bevölkerungs- und Moralstatistik. Jena: Fischer.Google Scholar
Lexis, W. (1875). Einleitung in die Theorie des Bevölkerungsstatistik. Strassburg: Trübner.Google Scholar
Lexis, W. (1879/1903). ‘Über die Theorie der Stabilität statistischer Reihen’ in Abhandlungen zur Theorie der Bevölkerungs- und Moralstatistik. Jena: Fischer.Google Scholar
Lie, E. (2002). ‘The Rise and Fall of Sample Surveys in Norway’, Science in Context, 15: 385–409.Google Scholar
Linsley, C. A. and Linsley, C. L. (1993). ‘Booth, Rowntree and Llewelyn Smith: A Reassessment of Interwar Poverty’, Economic History Review, 46: 86–104.Google Scholar
Lipset, S. M., Trow, M. A. and Coleman, J. S. (1956). Union Democracy: The Internal Politics of the International Typographical Union. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Lipset, S. M. and Bendix, R. (1959). Social Mobility in Industrial Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Little, D. (2012). ‘Analytical Sociology and the Rest of Sociology’, Sociologica, DOI:10.2383/36894.Google Scholar
Llewellyn Smith, H., ed. (1930–5). The New Survey of London Life and Labour. London: P. S. King.Google Scholar
Lottin, J. (1912). Quetelet, Statisticien et Sociologue. Louvain: Institut Supérieur de Philosophie.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, D. (1981). Statistics in Britain, 1865–1930: The Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Macy, M. W. and Willer, R. (2002). ‘From Factors to Actors: Computational Sociology and Agent-Based Modelling’, Annual Review of Sociology, 28: 143–66.Google Scholar
Macy, M. W. and Flache, A. (2009). ‘Social Dynamics from the Bottom Up: Agent-Based Models of Social Interaction’, in Hedström, P. and Bearman, P., eds., Analytical Sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Madge, J. (1963). The Origins of Scientific Sociology. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Magnello, M. E. (1999). ‘The Non-Correlation of Biometrics and Eugenics: Rival Forms of Laboratory Work in Karl Pearson’s Career at University College London’, History of Science, 37, Part 1: 79–106, Part 2: 124–47.Google Scholar
Manzo, G. (2012). ‘Reason-Based Explanations and Analytical Sociology: A Rejoinder to Boudon’, Revue européenne des sciences sociales, 50: 35–65.Google Scholar
Manzo, G. (2013). ‘Educational Choices and Social Interactions: A Formal Model and a Computational Test’, Comparative Social Research, 30: 47–100.Google Scholar
Manzo, G., ed. (2014a). Analytical Sociology: Actions and Networks. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Manzo, G. (2014b). ‘Introduction to Chapter 1’, in Manzo, G., G., ed., Analytical Sociology: Actions and Networks. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Marsden, P. V. (2005). ‘The Sociology of James S. Coleman’, Annual Review of Sociology, 31: 1–24.Google Scholar
Marshall, G. (1980). Presbyteries and Profits: Calvinism and the Development of Capitalism in Scotland, 1560–1707. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Marshall, G. (1982). In Search of the Spirit of Capitalism. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Maunder, W. F. (1977). ‘Sir Arthur Lyon Bowley (1867–1957)’, in Kendall, M. and Plackett, R. M., eds., Studies in the History of Statistics and Probability, vol 2. London: Charles Griffin.Google Scholar
Mayer-Schönberger, V. and Cukier, K. (2013). Big Data. London: Murray.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. (1982). The Growth of Biological Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. (2001). ‘The Philosophical Foundations of Darwinism’, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 145: 488–95.Google Scholar
Merllié, D. (1995). ‘Les travaux empiriques sur la mobilité sociale avant la Première Guerre mondiale’, Revue française de sociologie, 36: 5–31.Google Scholar
Merton, R. K. (1936). ‘The Unanticipated Consequence of Purposive Social Action’, American Sociological Review, 1: 894–904.Google Scholar
Merton, R. K. (1938). ‘Science, Technology and Society in Seventeenth Century England’, in Osiris: Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science and on the History of Learning and Culture. Bruges: St. Catherine Press.Google Scholar
Merton, R. K. (1940). ‘Fact and Factitiousness in Ethnic Questionnaires’, American Sociological Review, 5: 13–28,Google Scholar
Merton, R. K. (1945). ‘Sociological Theory’, American Journal of Sociology, 50: 462–73.Google Scholar
Merton, R. K. (1948). ‘The Position of Sociological Theory’, American Sociological Review, 13: 164–8.Google Scholar
Merton, R. K. (1949/1957). Social Theory and Social Structure. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar
Merton, R. K. (1967). On Theoretical Sociology. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Merton, R. K. (1968). ‘The Matthew Effect in Science’, Science, 159: 56–63.Google Scholar
Merton, R. K. (1973). The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Merton, R. K. (1975). ‘Structural Analysis in Sociology’, in Blau, P. M., ed., Approaches to the Study of Social Structure. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Merton, R. K. (1987). ‘Three Fragments from a Sociologist’s Notebooks: Establishing the Phenomenon, Specified Ignorance, and Strategic Research Materials’, Annual Review of Sociology, 13: 1–28.Google Scholar
Merton, R. K. (1996). ‘Teaching James Coleman’, Appendix 1 in Clark, J., ed., James S. Coleman. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Merton, R. K. (1998). ‘Working with Lazarsfeld: Notes and Contexts’, in Lautman, J. and Lécuyer, B.-P, eds., Paul Lazarsfeld (1901–1976): La sociologie de Vienne à New York. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Merton, R. K. and Kendall, P. L. (1946). ‘The Focused Interview’, American Journal of Sociology, 51: 541–57.Google Scholar
Merton, R. K. and Kitt, A. S. (1950). ‘Contributions to the Theory of Reference Group Behaviour’, in Merton, R. K. and Lazarsfeld, P. F., eds., Continuities in Social Research: Studies in the Scope and Method of ‘The American Soldier’. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar
Merton, R. K. and Lazarsfeld, P. F., eds., Continuities in Social Research: Studies in the Scope and Method of ‘The American Soldier’. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar
Merton, R. K., Coleman, J. S. and Rossi, P. H., eds. (1979). Qualitative and Quantitative Social Research: Papers in Honor of Paul F. Lazarsfeld. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Merton, R. K., Sills, D. L. and Stigler, S. M. (1984). ‘The Kelvin Dictum and Social Science: An Excursion into the History of an Idea’, Journal of the History of the Behavioural Sciences, 20: 319–31.Google Scholar
Mesure, S., ed. (1998). La rationalité des valeurs. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Michels, R. (1911/1949). Political Parties. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (1843/1973–4). ‘A System of Logic Ratiocinative and Inductive’, in Robson, J. M., ed., Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Mills, C. (2014). ‘The Great British Class Fiasco’, Sociology, 48: 437–44.Google Scholar
Mills, T. C. (2017). A Statistical Biography of George Udny Yule: A Loafer of the World. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Mises, L. von (1949). Human Action. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Moggridge, D. E. (1992). Maynard Keynes: An Economist’s Biography. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Moreno, J. L. (1934). Who Shall Survive? New York: Beacon House.Google Scholar
Morgan, S. L. and Winship, C. (2007). Counterfactuals and Causal Inference: Methods and Principles for Social Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morin, J.-M. (2006). Boudon, un sociologue classique. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Morrison, D. (1978). ‘Kultur and Culture: The Case of Theodor W. Adorno and Paul F. Lazarsfeld’, Social Research, 45: 331–55.Google Scholar
Mosselmans, B. (2005). ‘Adolphe Quetelet, the Average Man and the Development of Economic Methodology’, European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 12: 565–82.Google Scholar
Neurath, P. (1998). ‘The Life and Work of Paul Lazarsfeld’, in Lautman, J. and Lécuyer, B.-P., eds., Paul Lazarsfeld (1901–1976): La sociologue de Vienne à New York. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Neyman, J. (1934). ‘On the Two Different Aspects of the Representative Method: The Method of Stratified Sampling and the Method of Purposive Selection’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 97: 558–606 (with discussion).Google Scholar
Neyman, J. (1952). Lectures and Conferences on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. Washington, DC: US Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Neyman, J. (1974). ‘Study of Chance Mechanisms – A Quasi-Copernican Revolution in Science and Mathematics’, in Neyman, J., ed., The Heritage of Copernicus. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Nisbet, R. A. (1966). The Sociological Tradition. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Oberschall, A. R. (1965). Empirical Social Research in Germany, 1848–1914. Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar
Oberschall, A. R. (1987). ‘The Two Empirical Roots of Social Theory and the Probability Revolution’, in Krüger, L., Gigerenzer, G. and Morgan, M. S., eds., The Probabilistic Revolution, vol. 2. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Offenbacher, M. (1900). Konfession und soziale Schichtung. Eine Studie über die Wirtschaftliche Lage der Katholiken und Protestanten in Baden. Tübingen and Leipzig: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).Google Scholar
Ogburn, W. F. (1912/1964). ‘Progress and Uniformity in Child-Labor Legislation’, in Duncan, O. D., ed., William F. Ogburn on Culture and Social Change. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ogburn, W. F. (1922). Social Change with Respect to Culture and Original Nature. New York: Huebsch.Google Scholar
Ogburn, W. F. (1923). ‘The Fluctuations of Business as Social Forces’, Journal of Social Forces, 1: 73–8.Google Scholar
Ogburn, W. F. (1927). ‘Sociology and Statistics’, in Ogburn, W. F. and Goldenweiser, A., eds., The Social Sciences and their Interrelations. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Ogburn, W. F. (1930a). ‘Three Obstacles to the Development of a Scientific Sociology’, Social Forces, 8: 347–50.Google Scholar
Ogburn, W. F. (1930b). ‘The Folkways of a Scientific Sociology’, Publications of the American Sociological Society, 24: 1–11.Google Scholar
Ogburn, W. F. (1933). ‘A Reply’, Journal of Political Economy, 41: 210–21.Google Scholar
Ogburn, W. F. (1935). ‘Recent Changes in Marriage’, American Journal of Sociology, 41: 285–98.Google Scholar
Ogburn, W. F. (1955). ‘Some Observations on Sociological Research’, Social Forces, 34: 10–18.Google Scholar
Ogburn, W. F. and Hill, E. (1935). ‘Income Classes and the Roosevelt Vote in 1932’, Political Science Quarterly, 50: 186–93.Google Scholar
Ogburn, W. F. and Nimkoff, M. F. (1940). Sociology. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Ogburn, W. F. and Peterson, D. (1916). ‘Political Thought of Social Classes’, Political Science Quarterly, 31: 300–17.Google Scholar
Ogburn, W. F. and Talbot, N. S. (1929). ‘A Measurement of the Factors in the Presidential Election of 1928’, Social Forces, 8: 175–83.Google Scholar
Ogburn, W. F. and Thomas, D. S. (1922). ‘The Influence of the Business Cycle on Certain Social Conditions’, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 18: 324–40.Google Scholar
Olson, M. (1965). The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Opp, K.-D. (2013). ‘What Is Analytical Sociology? Strengths and Weaknesses of a New Sociological Research Paradigm’, Social Science Information, 52: 329–60.Google Scholar
Park, D. K., Gelman, A. and Bafumi, J. (2004). ‘Bayesian Multilevel Estimation with Poststratification: State-Level Estimates from National Polls’, Political Analysis, 12: 375–85.Google Scholar
Park, R. E. and Burgess, E. W. (1921). Introduction to the Science of Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. (1937). The Structure of Social Action. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. (1951). The Social System. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar
Pavlinov, I. Y. (2013). The Species Problem – Ongoing Issues. Rijeka: IntechOpen.Google Scholar
Pawson, R. (2009). ‘On the Shoulders of Merton: Boudon as the Modern Guardian of Middle-Range Theory’, in Cherkaoui, M. and Hamilton, P., eds., Raymond Boudon: A Life in Sociology. Oxford: Bardwell Press.Google Scholar
Pearson, K. (1892). The Grammar of Science. London: Walter Scott.Google Scholar
Pearson, K. (1904). On the Theory of Contingency and Its Relation to Association and Normal Correlation. London: Dulau.Google Scholar
Pearson, K. (1910). The Influence of Parental Alcoholism on the Physique and Ability of the Offspring: A Reply to the Cambridge Economists. London: Dulau.Google Scholar
Pearson, K. (1914, 1925, 1930). The Life, Letters and Labours of Francis Galton, 3 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pearson, K., with Pearson, E. S., ed. (1977). The History of Statistics in the 17th and 18th Centuries. London: Charles Griffin.Google Scholar
Pearson, K. and Elderton, E. M. (1910). A Second Study of the Influence of Parental Alcoholism on the Physique and Intelligence of the Offspring. London: Dulau.Google Scholar
Perrin, E. (1904). ‘On the Contingency between Occupations in the Case of Fathers and Sons’, Biometrika, 3: 467–9.Google Scholar
Pettigrew, A. (2015). ‘Samuel Stouffer and Relative Deprivation’, Social Psychological Quarterly, 78: 7–24.Google Scholar
Petty, W. (1683). Observations on the Dublin-Bills of Mortality. London: Mark Pardoe.Google Scholar
Pfautz, H. W. and Duncan, O. D. (1950). ‘A Critical Evaluation of Warner’s Work in Community Stratification’, American Sociological Review, 15: 205–15.Google Scholar
Piekalkiewicz, J. (1934). Rapport sur les recherches concernant la structure de la population ouvrière en Pologne selon la méthode representative (French résumé of Polish text). Warsaw: Institute for Social Problems.Google Scholar
Pigou, A. C. (1910). ‘Memorandum on Some Economic Aspects and Effects of Poor Law Relief’, Royal Commission on the Poor Laws and Relief of Distress, vol. 9, Appendix 80. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Pigou, A. C. (1911). ‘Alcoholism and Heredity’, Westminster Gazette, February 2.Google Scholar
Platt, J. (1985). ‘Weber’s Verstehen and the History of Qualitative Research’, British Journal of Sociology, 36: 448–66.Google Scholar
Platt, J. (1986). ‘Functionalism and the Survey: The Relation of Theory and Method’, Sociological Review, 34: 501–36.Google Scholar
Pollak, M. (1980). ‘Paul F. Lazarsfeld: A Sociointellectual Biography’, Knowledge, Diffusion, Utilization, 2: 157–77.Google Scholar
Popper, K. R. (1934/1959). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Popper, K. R. (1945). The Open Society and Its Enemies. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Popper, K. R. (1957). The Poverty of Historicism. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Popper, K. R. (1976). Unended Quest: An Intellectual Autobiography. Glasgow: Fontana Collins.Google Scholar
Popper, K. R. (1994). The Myth of the Framework. London; Routledge.Google Scholar
Porter, T. M. (1982). ‘A Statistical Survey of Gases: Maxwell’s Social Physics’, Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences’, 8: 77–116.Google Scholar
Porter, T. M. (1986). The Rise of Statistical Thinking 1820–1900. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Porter, T. M. (2004). Karl Pearson: The Scientific Life in a Statistical Age. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
President’s Research Committee on Social Trends (1933). Recent Social Trends in the United States. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Prévost, J.-G. (2009). A Total Science: Statistics in Liberal and Fascist Italy. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
Quetelet, A. (1835/1842). A Treatise on Man and the Development of His Faculties. Edinburgh: Chambers.Google Scholar
Quetelet, A. (1846). Lettres à S.A.R. le Duc Regnant de Saxe-Cobourg et Gotha, sur la théorie des probabilités appliquée aux sciences morales et politiques. Brussels: Hayez.Google Scholar
Quetelet, A. (1869). Physique sociale, ou essai sur le développement des facultés de l’homme. Brussels: Muquardt.Google Scholar
Raab, W. and Voss, T. (2017). ‘Micro–macro Models in Sociology: Antecedents of Coleman’s Diagram’, in Jann, B. and Przepiorka, W., eds., Social Dilemmas, Institutions, and the Evolution of Cooperation. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Radkau, J. (2009). Max Weber: A Biography. London: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Rasch, G. (1960/1980). Probabilistic Models for some Intelligence and Attainment Tests. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Rasch, G. (1968). ‘An Individualistic Approach to Item Analysis’, in Lazarsfeld, P. F. and Henry, N. W., eds., Readings in Mathematical Social Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ravitch, D. (1993). ‘The Coleman Reports and American Education’, in Sørensen, A. B. and Spilerman, S., eds., Social Theory and Social Policy: Essays in Honor of James S. Coleman. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
Reid, C. (1982). Neyman – From Life. New York: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Renwick, C. (2012). British Sociology’s Lost Biological Roots: A History of Futures Past. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Renwick, C. (2019). ‘Richard Titmuss, Eugenics and Social Science in Mid-twentieth Century Britain’, in Panayotova, P., ed., The History of Sociology in Britain: New Research and Revaluation. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Robinson, W. S. (1950). ‘Ecological Correlations and the Behavior of Individuals’, American Sociological Review, 15: 351–7.Google Scholar
Rock, P. (1979). The Making of Symbolic Interactionism. Totowa: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Rogoff, N. (1953). Recent Trends in Occupational Mobility. Free Press: New York.Google Scholar
Rowntree, B. S. (1901). Poverty: A Study of Town Life. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Ryan, J. W. (2013). Samuel Stouffer and the GI Survey: Sociologists and Soldiers during the Second World War. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar
Sagalnik, M. J. (2018). Bit by Bit: Social Research in the Digital Age. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Santoro, M. (2017). ‘The Gini-Merton Connection: An Episode in the History of Sociology and Its International Circulation’, Sociologica, DOI: 10.2383/89511.Google Scholar
Sarton, G. (1935). ‘Preface’, Isis, 23: 6–24.Google Scholar
Savage, M. et al. (2013). ‘A New Model of Social Class? Findings from the BBC’s Great Class Survey Experiment’, Sociology, 47: 219–50.Google Scholar
Savage, M. and Burrows, R. (2007). ‘The Coming Crisis of Empirical Sociology’, Sociology, 41: 885–99.Google Scholar
Schad, S. P. (1972). Empirical Social Research in Weimar-Germany. Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar
Schelling, T. (1971). ‘Dynamic Models of Segregation’, Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1: 143–86.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. (1908). ‘On the Concept of Social Value’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 23: 213–32.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. (1954). A History of Economic Analysis. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Schütz, A. (1932/1967). The Phenomenology of the Social World. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Selvin, H. C. (1968). ‘Methods of Survey Analysis’, in Sills, D., ed., International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences. New York: Macmillan and Free Press.Google Scholar
Selvin, H. C. (1975). ‘On Formalizing Theory’, in Coser, L. A., ed. The Idea of Social Structure: Papers in Honor of Robert K. Merton. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Selvin, H. C. (1976). ‘Durkheim, Booth and Yule: The Non-Diffusion of an Intellectual Innovation’, Archives européennes de sociologie, 17: 39–51.Google Scholar
Seng, Y. P. (1951). ‘Historical Survey of Sampling Theory and Practice’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 114: 214–31.Google Scholar
Sills, D. (1998). ‘The Lazarsfeld Story as Genre’, in Lautman, J. and Lécuyer, B.-P, eds., Paul Lazarsfeld (1901–1976): La sociologie de Vienne à New York. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
Sills, D. L. (1979). ‘Lazarsfeld, Paul F.’, in Sills, D. L., ed., International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, vol. 18, Biographical Supplement. New York: Free PressGoogle Scholar
Silver, C., ed. (1982). Frédéric Le Play on Family, Work and Social Change. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1979). ‘The Meaning of Causal Ordering’, in Merton, R. K., Coleman, J. S. and Rossi, P. H., eds., Qualitative and Quantitative Social Research: Papers in Honor of Paul F. Lazarsfeld. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Singerman, D. R. (2016). ‘Keynesian Eugenics and the Goodness of the World’, Journal of British Studies, 55: 538–66.Google Scholar
Skidelsky, R. (1983). John Maynard Keynes: Hopes Betrayed 1883–1920. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Skog, O.-J. (1991). ‘Alcohol and Suicide – Durkheim Revisited’, Acta Sociologica, 34: 193–206.Google Scholar
Smelser, N. J. (1986). ‘The Ogburn Vision Fifty Years Later’, in Smelser, N. J. and Gerstein, D. R., eds., Behavioral and Social Science: Fifty Years of Discovery. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Smith, H., Pettigrew, T. F., Pippin, G. and Bialosiewicz, S. (2012). ‘Relative Deprivation: A Theoretical and Meta-Analytic Critique’, Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16: 203–32.Google Scholar
Smith, T. M. F. (1997). ‘Social Surveys and Social Science’, Canadian Journal of Statistics, 25: 23–44.Google Scholar
Sobel, M., Hout, M. and Duncan, O. D. (1985). ‘Exchange, Structure and Symmetry in Occupational Mobility’, American Journal of Sociology, 91: 359–72.Google Scholar
Sofer, R. N. (1982). ‘Why Do Disciplines Fail? The Strange Case of British Sociology’, English Historical Review, 97: 767–802.Google Scholar
Sorokin, P. A. (1933). ‘Recent Social Trends: A Criticism’, Journal of Political Economy, 41: 194–210.Google Scholar
Spiegelhalter, D. (2019). The Art of Statistics: Learning from Data. London: Penguin Random House.Google Scholar
Sprat, T. (1667/1734). The History of the Royal Society of London for the Improvement of Natural Knowledge. London: Martyn and Allestry.Google Scholar
Stadtfeld, C., Holloway, J. and Block, P. (2017). ‘Dynamic Network Actor Models: Investigating Coordination Ties through Time’, Sociological Methodology, 47: 1–40.Google Scholar
Stevens, S. S. (1946). ‘On the Theory of Scales of Measurement’, Science, 103: 677–80.Google Scholar
Stevens, S. S. (1975). Psychophysics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Stigler, S. M. (1986). The History of Statistics: The Measurement of Uncertainty before 1900. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Stigler, S. M. (1999). Statistics on the Table. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Stigler, S. M. (2002) ‘The Missing Early History of Contingency Tables’, Annales de la faculté des sciences de Toulouse, 6e serie, 11: 563–73.Google Scholar
Stigler, S. M. (2012). ‘Karl Pearson and the Rule of Three’, Biometrika, 99: 1–14.Google Scholar
Stigler, S. M. (2016). The Seven Pillars of Statistical Wisdom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Stinchcombe, A. L. (1993). ‘The Conditions of Fruitfulness of Theorizing about Mechanisms in Social Science’, in Sørensen, A. B. and Spilerman, S., eds., Social Theory and Social Policy: Essays in Honor of James S. Coleman. Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
Stone, R. (1997). Some British Empiricists in the Social Sciences, 1650–1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stouffer, S. A. (1931). ‘Experimental Comparison of a Statistical and a Case History Technique of Attitude Research’, Publications of the American Sociological Society, 25: 154–6.Google Scholar
Stouffer, S. A. (1934). ‘Sociology and Sampling’, in Bernard, L. L., ed., The Fields and Methods of Sociology. New York: Long and Smith.Google Scholar
Stouffer, S. A. (1935). ‘Statistical Induction in Rural Social Research’, Social Forces, 4: 505–15.Google Scholar
Stouffer, S. A. (1950). ‘Some Afterthoughts of a Contributor to “The American Soldier”’ in Merton, R. K. and Lazarsfeld, P. F., eds., Continuities in Social Research: Studies in the Scope and Method of ‘The American Soldier’. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar
Stouffer, S. A. (1951). ‘An Empirical Study of Technical Problems in Analysis of Role Obligation’, in Parsons, T. and Shils, E. A., eds., Toward a General Theory of Action. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Stouffer, S. A. (1955). Communism, Conformity and Civil Liberties. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Stouffer, S. A. (1958). ‘Karl Pearson – An Appreciation on the 100th Anniversary of His Birth’, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 53: 23–7.Google Scholar
Stouffer, S. A. (1962). Social Research to Test Ideas. Glencoe: Free Press.Google Scholar
Stouffer, S. A. and Lazarsfeld, P. F. (1937). Research Memorandum on the Family in the Depression. New York: Social Science Research Council.Google Scholar
Stouffer, S. A. et al. (1949). Studies in Social Psychology in World War II, vol. 1, The American Soldier: Adjustment during Army Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stouffer, S. A. et al. (1949). Studies in Social Psychology in World War II, vol. 2, The American Soldier: Combat and Its Aftermath. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stouffer, S. A. et al. (1950). Studies in Social Psychology in World War II, vol. 4, Measurement and Prediction. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sturgis, P. et al. (2015). Report of the Inquiry into the 2015 British General Election Opinion Polls. London: British Polling Council and the Market Research Society.Google Scholar
Sullivan, P. A. (1998). ‘An Engineer Dissects Two Case Studies: Hayles on Fluid Mechanics and MacKenzie on Statistics’, in Koertge, N., ed., A House Built on Sand. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Surowiecki, J. S. (2005). The Wisdom of Crowds. London: Abacus.Google Scholar
Süssmilch, J. P. (1741). Die göttliche Ordnung in den Veränderungen des menschlichen Geschlechts aus der Geburt, dem Tode und der Fortpflanzung deselben erwiesen. Berlin: Verlag des Buchladens der Realschule.Google Scholar
Sutherland, I. (1963). ‘John Graunt: A Tercentenary Tribute’, Journal of the Royal Stati1stical Society, Series A, 126: 537–56.Google Scholar
Swedberg, R. (1990). Economics and Sociology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Swedberg, R. (2001). ‘Sociology and Game Theory: Contemporary and Historical Perspectives’, Theory and Society, 30: 301–35.Google Scholar
Sztompka, P. (1986). Robert K. Merton: An Intellectual Profile. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Taussig, F. W. and Joslyn, C. S. (1932). American Business Leaders. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Thomas, W. I. and Znaniecki, F. (1918–20). The Polish Peasant in Europe and America. Boston: R. G. Badger.Google Scholar
Thompson, W. (1889). Popular Lectures and Addresses. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Toby, J. (1980). ‘Samuel A. Stouffer: Social Research as a Calling’, in Merton, R. K. and Riley, M. W., eds., Sociological Traditions from Generation to Generation. Norwood: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1974). ‘Judgment under Uncertainty’, Science, 185: 1124–31.Google Scholar
Tylor, E. B. (1889). ‘On a Method of Investigating the Development of Institutions: Applied to Laws of Marriage and Descent’, Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 18: 245–6, 261–9.Google Scholar
Uglow, J. (2002). The Lunar Men: The Friends Who Made the Future. London: Faber.Google Scholar
Sozialpolitik, Verein für (1912). Verhandlungen der Generalversammlung in Nürnberg, 1911. Leipzig: Dunker und Humbolt.Google Scholar
Voas, D. (2009). ‘The Rise and Fall of Fuzzy Fidelity in Europe’, European Sociological Review, 25: 155–68.Google Scholar
Wang, W., Rothschild, D., Goel, S. and Gelman, A. (2015). ‘Forecasting Elections with Non-Representative Polls’, International Journal of Forecasting, 31: 980–91.Google Scholar
Warner, W. L. (1949). Democracy in Jonesville. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Warner, W. L. and Lunt, P. S. (1941). The Social Life of a Modern Community. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Warner, W. L., Meeker, M. and Ells, K. (1949). Social Class in America. Chicago: Science Research Associates.Google Scholar
Weber, Marianne (1926/1975). Max Weber: A Biography. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1892). Die Verhältnisse der Landarbeiter im ostelbischen Deutschland. Leipzig: Schriften des Vereins für Sozialpolitik.Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1893). ‘Die Erhebung des Evangelisch-Sozialen Kongresses über die Verhältnisse der Landarbeiter Deutschlands’, Christliche Welt, 7: 553–40.Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1903/2012). ‘Roscher’s “Historical Method”’, in Bruun and Whimster, eds. (2012).Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1904/2012). ‘The “Objectivity” of Knowledge in Social Science and Social Policy’, in Bruun and Whimster, eds. (2012).Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1905/2012). ‘Knies and the Problem of Irrationality’, in Bruun and Whimster, eds. (2012).Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1908a/1973). ‘Methodological Introduction for the Survey of the Society for Social Policy concerning Selection and Adaptation (Choice and Course of Occupation) for the Workers of Major Industrial Enterprises’, in Eldridge, ed. (1973).Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1908b). ‘Zur Psychophysik der industriellen Arbeit’, Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik, 27: 730–70.Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1908c/2012). ‘The Theory of Marginal Utility and the “Fundamental Law of Psychophysics”’, in Bruun and Whimster, eds. (2012).Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1909/2012). ‘“Energetical” Theories of Culture’, in Bruun and Whimster (2012).Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1913/2012). ‘On Some Categories of Interpretive Sociology’, in Bruun and Whimster, eds. (2012).Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1919/2012). ‘Science as Profession and Vocation’, in Bruun and Whimster eds. (2012).Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1920a/1930). The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1920b/1970) ‘The Protestant Sects and the Spirit of Capitalism’, in Gerth and Mills, eds. (1970).Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1922/1968). Economy and Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max (1923/1927). General Economic History. Glencoe: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Welty, G. (1990). ‘The Attack on Mead and the Dialectics of Anthropology’, Science and Nature, 9: 14–27.Google Scholar
Westergaard, H. (1932). Contributions to the History of Statistics. London: King.Google Scholar
Whitehead, A. N. (1916). ‘The Organisation of Thought’, Presidential Address to Section A, Mathematical and Physical Science, British Association for the Advancement of Science, Newcastle-on-Tyne.Google Scholar
Willcox, W. F. (1938). ‘The Founder of Statistics’, Revue de l’Institut International de Statistique, 5: 321–8.Google Scholar
Wineberg, S. S. and Shulan, L. S. (1990). ‘The Self-Fulfilling Prophecy’, in Clark, J., Modgil, C. and Modgil, S., eds., Robert K. Merton: Consensus and Controversy. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Wolfle, L. M. (2003). ‘The Introduction of Path Analysis to the Social Sciences and some Emergent Themes: An Annotated Bibliography’, Structural Equation Modelling: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 10: 1–34.Google Scholar
Wright, G. H. von (1971). Explanation and Understanding. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, J. D. (2009). ‘The Founding Fathers of Sociology: Francis Galton, Adolphe Quetelet, and Charles Booth or What Do People You Probably Never Have Heard of Have to Do with the Foundations of Sociology’, Journal of Applied Social Science, 3: 63–72.Google Scholar
Wright, S. (1920). ‘The Relative Importance of Heredity and Environment in Determining the Piebald Pattern of Guinea-Pigs’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 6: 320–32.Google Scholar
Wright, S. (1921). ‘Correlation and Causation’, Journal of Agricultural Research, 20: 557–85.Google Scholar
Xie, Y. (2007). ‘Otis Dudley Duncan’s Legacy: The Demographic Approach to Quantitative Reasoning in Social Science’, Research in Social stratification and Mobility, 25: 141–56.Google Scholar
Yule, G. U. (1895). ‘On the Correlation of Total Pauperism with Proportion of Out-Relief’, Economic Journal, 5: 603–11.Google Scholar
Yule, G. U. (1899). ‘An Investigation into the Causes of Changes in Pauperism in England, chiefly during the Last Two Intercensal Decades’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 62: 249–95.Google Scholar
Yule, G. U. (1900). ‘On the Association of Attributes in Statistics’, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London (A), 194: 257–319.Google Scholar
Yule, G. U. (1911). An Introduction to the Theory of Statistics. London: Charles Griffin.Google Scholar
Yule, G. U. (1912). ‘On the Methods of Measuring Association between Two Attributes’, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 75: 579–642.Google Scholar
Yule, G. U. (1939). ‘On Sentence-Length as a Statistical Characteristic of Style in Prose: With Application to Two Cases of Disputed Authorship’, Biometrika, 30: 363–90.Google Scholar
Zeisel, H. (1979). ‘The Vienna Years’, in Merton, R. K., Coleman, J. S. and Rossi, P. H., eds., Qualitative and Quantitative Social Research: Papers in Honor of Paul F. Lazarsfeld. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • John H. Goldthorpe, University of Oxford
  • Book: Pioneers of Sociological Science
  • Online publication: 15 February 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108933254.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • John H. Goldthorpe, University of Oxford
  • Book: Pioneers of Sociological Science
  • Online publication: 15 February 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108933254.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • John H. Goldthorpe, University of Oxford
  • Book: Pioneers of Sociological Science
  • Online publication: 15 February 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108933254.012
Available formats
×