Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T01:10:36.810Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

19 - Speech rhythm in English and Japanese

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

John Local
Affiliation:
University of York
Richard Ogden
Affiliation:
University of York
Rosalind Temple
Affiliation:
University of York
Get access

Summary

Introduction

This paper has two main objectives. First, we propose that cross-linguistic variation in speech rhythm is not phonetically manifested simply as acoustic isochrony, but rather as relative temporal stability of syllables – i.e. the tendency for certain syllables to occur at particular points in time despite other factors that oppose this tendency. Second, we compare two languages believed to be rhythmically distinct, English and Japanese, and demonstrate that they not only display reliable rhythmic differences, but also striking similarities in the phonetic manifestation of foot-level structure. These goals are accomplished by using speech cycling – an artificial speaking task in which subjects repeat phrases in time with periodic auditory stimuli.

Rhythmic typologies

There has long been an intuition that languages are spoken with different kinds of rhythm. Conventionally, languages have been classified as either ‘stress-timed’ or ‘syllable-timed’ (Jones 1918; Pike 1945; Abercrombie 1967), depending on whether it is interstress intervals or intersyllable intervals that are regular. The prediction about timing that is generally seen to follow from ‘stress-timed’, ‘syllable-timed’, or even ‘mora-timed’ (Port, Dalby and O'Dell 1987), is perfect isochrony (equal time intervals) of stresses, syllables or moras. Not surprisingly, however, perfect isochrony has proven to be a difficult test to satisfy, at least in naturalistic speaking styles (Lehiste 1977; Dauer 1983; Couper-Kuhlen 1993).

In generative phonology, a way of characterizing the rhythm of so-called stress-accent languages has evolved based on the quasi-periodic alternation of strong and weak syllables (Liberman and Prince 1977; Selkirk 1984).

Type
Chapter
Information
Phonetic Interpretation
Papers in Laboratory Phonology VI
, pp. 322 - 339
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×