Suggested Reading
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 April 2020
Summary
There continues to be a robust conversation going on in scholarship about what kind of letter category fits Philippians. Not long ago, a large number of scholars were convinced it is a “letter or friendship,” but there is more hesitancy today.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Philippians , pp. 28 - 32Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Holloway, P., Consolation in Philippians: Philosophical Sources and Rhetorical Strategy. SNTSMS; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Llewelyn, S., “Sending Letters in the Ancient World: Paul and the Philippians.” TynBul 46.2 (1995): 337–356.Google Scholar
*Still, T. D., “More than Friends?: The Literary Classification of Philippians Revisited.” PRS 39.1 (2012): 53–66.Google Scholar
*Ascough, R., Paul’s Macedonian Associations: The Social Context of Philippians and 1 Thessalonians. WUNT 2; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2003.Google Scholar
Bakirtzis, C., ed. Philippi at the Time of Paul and after His Death. Harrisburg, PA: Trinity Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Berry, K., “The Function of Friendship Language in Philippians 4:10–20,” in Fitzgerald, J. T. (ed.), Friendship, Flattery, and Frankness of Speech: Studies on Friendship in the New Testament World. Leiden: Brill, 1996, 107–124.Google Scholar
Betz, H. D., Studies in Paul’s Letter to the Philippians. WUNT; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briones, D., Paul’s Financial Policy: A Socio-Theological Approach. LNTS; London: T & T Clark, 2015.Google Scholar
Cassidy, R. J., Paul in Chains: Roman Imprisonment and the Letters of Paul. New York: Crossroads, 2001.Google Scholar
Dahl, N. A., “Euodia and Syntyche and Paul’s Letter to the Philippians,” in Michael White, L. and Larry Yarbrough, O. (eds.), The Social World of the First Christians: Essays in Honor of Wayne A. Meeks. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1995, 3–15.Google Scholar
Geoffrion, T. C., The Rhetorical Purpose and the Political and Military Character of Philippians: A Call to Stand Firm. Lewiston: Edwin Mellen Press, 1993.Google Scholar
*Hellerman, J., Reconstructing Honor in Roman Philippi: Carmen Christi as Cursus Pudorum. SNTSMS; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellerman, J., “μορφῇ θεοῦ as a Signifier of Social Status in Philippians 2:6.” JETS 52.4 (2009): 779–797.Google Scholar
Hellerman, J., “The Humiliation of Christ in the Social World of Roman Philippi Part 1.” BSac 160.639 (2003), 321–335.Google Scholar
Hellerman, J., “The Humiliation of Christ in the Social World of Roman Philippi Part 2.” BSac 160.640 (2003), 421–433.Google Scholar
Hooker, M. D., “Philippians: Phantom Opponents and the Real Source of Conflict,” in Dunderberg, I., Tuckett, C., and Syreeni, K. (eds.), Fair Play: Diversity and Conflict in Early Christianity. NovTSup 103; Leiden: Brill, 2002, 377–395.Google Scholar
Jennings, M. A.. The Price of Partnership in Paul’s Letter to the Philippians. LNTS; London: T & T Clark, 2018.Google Scholar
Marchal, J., ed. The People beside Paul: the Philippians Assembly and History from Below. Atlanta, GA: SBL, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moessner, D. P.. “Turning Status ‘Upside Down’ in Phillipi: Christ Jesus’ ‘Emptying Himself’ as Forfeiting Any Acknowledgement of His ‘Equality with God’ (Phil 2:6–11).” HBT 31.2 (2009): 123–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
*Oakes, P. S., “God’s Sovereignty over Roman Authorities: A Theme in Philippians,” in Oakes, P. (ed.), Rome in the Bible and the Early Church. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2002, 126–141.Google Scholar
Oakes, P. S., “Jason and Penelope Hear Philippians 1:1–11,” in Understanding, Studying and Reading: New Testament Essays in Honour of John Ashton. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1998, 155–164.Google Scholar
Oakes, P. S., Philippians: From People to Letter. SNTSMS; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Oakes, P. S., “Re-mapping the Universe: Paul and the Emperor in 1 Thessalonians and Philippians.” JSNT 27.3 (2005): 301–322.Google Scholar
Ogereau, J. M., Paul’s Koinonia with the Philippians: A Socio-Historical Investigation of a Pauline Economic Partnership. WUNT 2; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2014.Google Scholar
Peterlin, D., Paul’s Letter to the Philippians in the Light of Disunity in the Church. NovTSup 79; Leiden: Brill, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterman, G., Paul’s Gift from Philippi: Conventions of Gift-Exchange and Christian Giving. SNTSMS; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.Google Scholar
*Pilhofer, P., Philippi: Band II: Katalog der Inschriften von Philippi. WUNT 2.119; Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2000.Google Scholar
Portefaix, L., Sisters Rejoice: Paul’s Letter to the Philippians and Luke-Acts as Received by Firsst-Century Philippian Women. ConBNT20; Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1988.Google Scholar
Smit, P.-B., “A Numismatic Note on Phil 2:9–11.” Biblische Notizen 149 (2011): 101–112.Google Scholar
*Tellbe, M., Paul between Synagogue and State: Christians, Jews, and Civic Authorities in 1 Thessalonians, Romans, and Philippians. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, 2001.Google Scholar
*Verhoef, E., Philippi: How Christianity Began in Europe: The Epistle to the Philippians and the Excavations at Philippi. London: Bloomsbury, 2013.Google Scholar
de Vos, C.. Church and Community Conflicts: The Relationships of the Thessalonian, Corinthian, and Philippian Churches with Their Wider Civic Communities. Atlanta, GA: Scholars Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Ware, J., Paul and the Mission of the Church: Philippians in Ancient Jewish Context. NovTSup; Leiden: Brill, 2005.Google Scholar
Williams, D., Enemies of the Cross of Christ: The Terminology of the Cross and Conflict in Philippians. JSNTSup 223; Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Asaju, D. F., “Philippians 2:5–11: An African Reading of Paul’s Christological Hymn of Exaltation.” Bangalore Theological Forum 37.1 (2005): 198–207.Google Scholar
Biggs, S., “Can an Enslaved God Liberate: Hermeneutical Reflections on Philippians 2:6–11.” Semeia 47 (1989): 137–153.Google Scholar
Bockmuehl, M. N. A., “‘The Form of God’ (Phil 2:6): Variants on a Theme of Jewish Mysticism.” JTS 48.1 (1997): 1–23.Google Scholar
Byrne, B., “Christ’s Pre-existence in Pauline Soteriology.” Theological Studies 58.2 (1997): 308–330.Google Scholar
Collins, A. Y., “Psalms, Philippians 2:6–11, and the Origins of Christology.” BibInt 11.3 (2003): 361–372.Google Scholar
Cousar, C. B., “The Function of the Christ-Hymn (2.6–11) in Philippians,” in Roetzel, C. J. and Foster, R. L. (eds.), The Impartial God: Essays in Biblical Studies in Honor of Jouette M. Bassler. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix Press, 2007), 212–220.Google Scholar
Eastman, S., “Philippians 2:6–11: Incarnation as Mimetic Participation.” JSPL 1.1 (2011): 1–22.Google Scholar
Ellis, E. E., “Preformed Traditions and Their Implications for Pauline Christology,” in Horrell, D. G. and Tuckett, C. M. (eds.), Christology, Controversy, and Community: New Testament Essays in Honour of David R. Catchpole. Leiden: Brill, 2000, 303–320.Google Scholar
*Fewster, G. P., “The Philippians’ ‘Christ Hymn’: Trends in Critical Scholarship.” CBR 13.2 (2015): 191–206.Google Scholar
Fisk, B., “The Odyssey of Christ: A Novel Context for Philippians 2:6–11,” in Stephen Evans, C. (ed.), Exploring Kenotic Christology: The Self-Emptying of God. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006, 45–73.Google Scholar
Fitzmyer, J., “The Aramaic Background of Philippians 2:6–11.” CBQ 50.3 (1988): 470–483.Google Scholar
Gorman, M. J., “‘Although/Because He Was in the Form of God’: The Theological Significance of Paul’s Master Story (Phil 2:6–11).” JTI 1.2 (2007): 147–169.Google Scholar
Gupta, N. K., “To Whom Was Christ a Slave (Phil 2:7)?: Double Agency and the Specters of Sin and Death in Philippians.” HBT 32.1 (2010): 1–16.Google Scholar
Hengel, M., “Präexistenz bei Paulus,” in Esckstein, H.-J. and Lichtenberger, H. (eds.), Jesus Christus also die Mitte der Schrift: Studien zur Hermeneutik des Evangeliums. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1997, 479–518.Google Scholar
Hooker, M. D., “Adam Redivivus: Philippians 2 Once More,” in Moyise, S. (ed.), The Old Testament in the New: Essays in Honour of J.L. North. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 2000, 220–234.Google Scholar
Hurst, L. D., “Re-enter the Pre-existent Christ in Philippians 2:5–11.” NTS 32.3 (1986): 449–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurtado, L. W., “Jesus as Lordly Examples in Phil 2:5–11,” in Richardson, P. and Hurd, J. C. (eds.), From Jesus to Paul: Studies in Honor of Francis Wright Beare. Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier Press, 1984, 113–126.Google Scholar
Kraftchick, S. J., “A Necessary Detour: Paul’s Metaphorical Understanding of the Philippians Hymn.” HBT 15.1 (1993): 1–37.Google Scholar
Lüdemann, G., “Phil 2,6–11 und gnostiche Christushymnen aus Nag Hammadi,” in Kollmann, B., Reinbold, W., and Steudel, A. (eds.), Antikes Judentum und frühes Christentum: Festschrift für Hartmut Stegemann zum 65. Geburtstag. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1999, 488–511.Google Scholar
*Martin, R. P., A Hymn of Christ: Philippians 2:5–11 in Recent Interpretation and in the Setting of Early Christian Worship. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Martin, R. P., Carmen Christi, Philippians 2:5–11 in Recent Interpretation and in the Setting of Early Christian Worship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Martin, R. P., ed. Where Christology Began: Essays on Philippians 2. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Meeks, W. A., “The Man from Heaven in Paul’s Letter to the Philippians,” in Pearson, B. (ed.), The Future of Early Christianity: Essays in Honor of Helmut Koester. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress, 1991, 329–336.Google Scholar
Tobin, T. H., “The World of Thought in the Philippian Hymn (Phil 2:6–11),” in Fotopoulos, J. (ed.), The New Testament and Early Christian Literature in the Greco-Roman Context: Studies in Honor of David E. Aune. Leiden: Brill, 2006, 91–104.Google Scholar
Wanamaker, C. A., “Philippians 2:6–11: Son of God or Adamic Christology?” NTS 33.2 (1987): 179–193.Google Scholar
Winter, S., “‘Obedient to Death’: Revisiting the Rhetorical Function of Philippians 2:6–11.” ABR 63 (2015): 1–13.Google Scholar
Wortham, R. A., “Christology as Community Identity in the Philippians Hymn: The Philippians Hymn as Social Drama (Philippians 2:5–11).” PRS 23.3 (1996): 269–287.Google Scholar
*Donfried, K. P. and Marshall, I. H., The Theology of the Shorter Pauline Letters. NTT; Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Fowl, S., “Know Your Context: Giving and Receiving Money in Philippians.” Interpretation 56.1 (2002): 45–58.Google Scholar
Fowl, S., “Learning to Narrate Our Lives in Christ,” in Seitz, C. and Greene-McCreight, K. (eds.), Theological Exegesis: Essays in Honor of Brevard S. Childs. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1999, 339–354.Google Scholar
*Gorman, M. J., Becoming the Gospel: Paul, Participation, and Mission. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2015.Google Scholar
Matera, F., “A Theology from Prison: Philippians, Philemon, Colossians, and Ephesians,” in New Testament Theology. Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2007, 199–239.Google Scholar
Nickelsburg, G. W. E., “The Incarnation: Paul’s Solution to the Universal Human Predicament,” in Pearson, B. (ed.), The Future of Early Christianity: Essays in Honor of Helmut Koester. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1991, 348–357.Google Scholar
Perkins, P., “Philippians: Theology for the Heavenly Politeuma,” in Bassler, J. M. (ed.), Pauline Theology, Volume I: Thessalonians, Philippians, Galatians, Philemon. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress, 1991, 89–114.Google Scholar
Reumann, J., “Christology in Philippians, Especially Chapter 3,” in Breytenbach, C. and Paulsen, H. (eds.), Anfänge der Christologie: Festschrift fü Ferdinand Hahn zum 65. Geburstag. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1991, 131–140.Google Scholar
Stowers, S. K., “Friends and Enemies in the Politics of Heaven: Reading Theology in Philippians,” in Bassler, J. M. (ed.), Pauline Theology. Minneapolis, N: Fortress, 1991, 105–121.Google Scholar
Barth, K.. The Epistle to the Philippians. Trans. Leitch, J.; English ed.; Richmond: John Knox Press, 1962.Google Scholar
*Bockmuehl, M. N. A.. The Epistle to the Philippians. BNTC; Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1997.Google Scholar
Cousar, C. B.. Philippians and Philemon: A Commentary. NTL; Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Edwards, M. J. (ed.). Galatians, Ephesians, Philippians. ACCS; Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1999.Google Scholar
*Fee, G. D.. Paul’s Letter to the Philippians. NICNT; Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1995.Google Scholar
Flemming, D.. Philippians: A Commentary in the Wesleyan Tradition. NBBC; Kansas City, MI: Beacon Hill Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Garland, D. E.. “Philippians,” in Garland, D. E. and Longman, T. III (eds.), Ephesians, Philippians, Colossians, Philemon. REBC; Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2006.Google Scholar
Hawthorne, G. F. and Martin, R. P. Philippians. WBC 43; Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson, 2004; 1st ed., 1983.Google Scholar
Hooker, M. D.. “The Letter to the Philippians,” in Keck, L. E. et al. (eds.), NIB 11. Nashville, TN: Abingdon, 2000: 467–550.Google Scholar
Houlden, J. L.. Paul’s Letters from Prison: Philippians, Colossians, Philemon, and Ephesians. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1970.Google Scholar
Migliore, Daniel L.. Philippians and Philemon. BTCB; Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox, 2014.Google Scholar
Müller, U. B.. Der Brief des Paulus an die Philipper. ThHK; Leipzig: Evangelische Verlag, 1993.Google Scholar
Reumann, J.. Philippians: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary. AYBC; New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, J. W. and Longenecker, B. W.. Philippians and Philemon: Paideia. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2016.Google Scholar
Thurston, B.. Philippians and Philemon. SP 10; Collegeville, MN: Liturgical Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Walter, N. et al. Die Briefe an die Philipper, Thessalonicher und an Philemon. NTD 8.2; Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1998.Google Scholar
Witherington, B. III. Paul’s Letter to the Philippians: A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2011.Google Scholar