Book contents
- Phenomenology of the Icon
- Phenomenology of the Icon
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Foreword
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Introduction: The Seashell Problem
- Chapter 1 Understanding the Icon
- Chapter 2 Resonance
- Chapter 3 The Window
- Chapter 4 Representation
- Chapter 5 Presence
- Chapter 6 Substitution
- Chapter 7 Performance
- Chapter 8 The Love Letter
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 17 August 2023
Preface by
Book contents
- Phenomenology of the Icon
- Phenomenology of the Icon
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Foreword
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- Introduction: The Seashell Problem
- Chapter 1 Understanding the Icon
- Chapter 2 Resonance
- Chapter 3 The Window
- Chapter 4 Representation
- Chapter 5 Presence
- Chapter 6 Substitution
- Chapter 7 Performance
- Chapter 8 The Love Letter
- Bibliography
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Phenomenology of the IconMediating God through the Image, pp. 272 - 291Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Primary Sources
Aristotle, . The Complete Works of Aristotle. 2 vols. Edited by Barnes, Jonathan. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Summa Theologiae. 61 vols. Blackfriars Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1964–80.Google Scholar
Athanasius of Alexandria. On the Incarnation: Saint Athanasius. Translated by John Behr. Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Augustine, . The Confessions. Translated by Maria Boulding, O.S.B. Hyde Park, NY: New City Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Augustine, . The Cambridge Edition of Early Christian Writings, vol. 1. Edited by Radde-Gallwitz, Andrew. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Augustine, . Tractates on the Gospel of John 11–27. Translated by John W. Retting. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Basil the Great. On the Holy Spirit. Translated by Stephen Hildebrand. Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Daley, Brian, S. J. Ed. Light on the Mountain: Greek Patristic and Byzantine Homilies on the Transfiguration of the Lord. Yonkers, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Adolphe Napoléon, Didron. Manuel d’iconographie chrétienne grecque et latine, traduit du manuscrit byzantin, le guide de le peinture par P. Durand. Paris: Imprimerie Royale, 1845.Google Scholar
Gibbon, Edward. The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, vol 3. Edited by Bury, John Bagnell. London: Methuen & Co, 1897.Google Scholar
Gregory Palamas. The Triads. In Defense of the Holy Hesychasts. Edited by Meyendorff, John. Translated by Nicholas Gendle. New York: Paulist Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Gregory the Great. The Letters of Gregory the Great, Vols. 1–3. Translated by John R. C. Martyn. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 2004.Google Scholar
Hazzard, Samuel and Sherbewitz-Wetzor, Olgerd P., eds. The Russian Primary Chronicle: Laurentian Text. Cambridge, MA: Medieval Society of America, 1953.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. Aesthetics: Lectures on Fine Art. Vol. I. Translated by T. M. Knox. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. The Philosophy of History. Translated by J. Sibree. New York: Dover Publications, 1956.Google Scholar
Isaac the Syrian. The Ascetical Homilies of Saint Isaac the Syrian. Boston: Holy Transfiguration Monastery, 2011.Google Scholar
James, Montague Rhodes, ed. The Apocryphal New Testament. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1960.Google Scholar
John of the Cross. The Collected Works of Saint John of the Cross. Translated by Kieran Kavanaugh and Otilio Rodriguez. Washington, DC: Institute of Carmelite Studies, 2017.Google Scholar
John of the Cross. Vida y Obras de San Juan de la Cruz. Edited by de Jesus, Crisogono, O.C.D., del Niño Jesus, Matias, O.C.D., and Ruano, Lucinio, O.C.D. Madrid: Biblioteca des Autores Cristianos, 1975.Google Scholar
John of Damascus. On the Divine Images. Three Apologies Against Those Who Attack the Divine Images. Translated by David Anderson. Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 1997.Google Scholar
John of Damascus. Writings. Fathers of the Church, A New Translation, Vol 37. Translated by Frederic H. Chase, Jr. New York: Fathers of the Church, Inc, 1958.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of the Power of Judgment. Translated by Paul Guyer and Eric Matthews. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason. Translated by Paul Guyer and Allen Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, Søren. Philosophical Fragments, Johannes Climacus. Translated by Howard V. Hong and Edna H. Hong. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, Søren. Sickness unto Death: A Christian Psychological Exposition for Upbuilding and Awakening. Translated by Howard V. Hong and Edna H. Hong. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, Søren. Concluding Unscientific Postscript. Translated by Alastair Hannay. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Mango, Cyril A. The Art of the Byzantine Empire, 312–1453. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1972.Google Scholar
Mansi, J. D., ed. Sacrorum Conciliorum Nova et Amplissima Collectio, 58 vols. Paris: H. Welter, 1901–1927.Google Scholar
Mesarites, Nikolaos. “Nikolaos Mesarites: Description of the Church of the Holy Apostles at Constantinople.” Translated by Glainville Downey. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 47:6 (1957): 859–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Migne, Jacques-Paul, ed. Patrologia Cursus Completus: Series Graeca. Vols. 1–161. Paris: Migne, 1857–66.Google Scholar
Migne, Jacques-Paul, ed. Patrologia Cursus Completus: Series Latina, Vols. 1–217. Paris: Migne, 1844–1865.Google Scholar
Motovilov, Nicholas Alexandrovich and St. Seraphim of Sarov. The Aim of Christian Life: St. Seraphim of Sarov’s Conversation with Nicholas Motovilov. Translated by John Phillips. Cambridge: Saints Alive Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Nicholas of Cusa. De visione Dei. Opera Omnia, vol. VI. Edited by Riemann, Adelaida Dorothea. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 2000.Google Scholar
Nicholas of Cusa. “On the Vision of God,” in Selected Spiritual Writings, 233–289. Translated by H. Lawrence. New Jersey: Paulist Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. Werke: Kritische Gesamtausgabe. Edited by Colli, Giorgio and Montinari, Mazzino. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1978.Google Scholar
Pascal, Blaise. Great Shorter Works of Pascal. Translated by Emile Cailliet and John C. Blankenagel. Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1948.Google Scholar
Pascal, Blaise. Oeuvres complètes. Edited by Lafuma, L.. Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1963.Google Scholar
Pascal, Blaise. Oeuvres complètes. Edited by Mesnard, J.. Paris: Desclée de Brouwer, 1964–92.Google Scholar
Pascal, Blaise. Pensées. Paris: Gallimard, 1977. Translated by A. J. Krailsheimer. New York: Penguin, 1966.Google Scholar
Pliny the Elder. Natural History. Translated by H. Rackham, W. H. S. Jones and D. E. Eichholz. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Plotinus. The Enneads. Translated by A. H. Armstrong. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite. The Divine Names and Mystical Theology of Pseudo-Dionysius Areopagite. Translated by John D. Jones. Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite. Pseudo-Dionysius: The Complete Works. Translated by Colm Luibheid and Paul Rorem. New York: Paulist Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Schaff, Philip and Wallace, Henry, eds. Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, 1st and 2nd series. Translated by H. R. Percival, repr. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans, 1886–1900.Google Scholar
Schleiermacher, Friedrich D. E. The Christian Faith. Edited by Mackintosh, H. R. and Stewart, J. S.. London: T&T Clark, 1999.Google Scholar
Tanner, Norman P., ed. Decrees of the Ecumenical Councils, 2 vols. London: Sheed and Ward; Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Theodore the Studite. On the Holy Icons. Translated by Catharine P. Roth. Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminar Press, 1987.Google Scholar
Theodore the Studite. “A Homily on the Veneration of the Precious and Life-Giving Cross.” Orthodox Tradition XX:3 (2003): 9–13.Google Scholar
Trubestskoi, Eugene. Icons: Theology in Color. Translated by Gertrude Vakar. Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Secondary Sources
Balthasar, Hans Urs von. Glory of the Lord Vol. I: Seeing the Form. Translated by Erasmo Leiva-Merikakis. Edinburgh: T & T Clark, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balthasar, Hans Urs von. Glory of the Lord Vol. II: Studies in Theological Styles: Clerical Styles. Translated by Andrew Louth, Francis McDonagh, Brian McNeil C. R. V. Edinburgh: T & T Clark, 1984.Google Scholar
Brague, Rémi. “La structure de l’apostolicité : la médiation immédiate,” with J.-M. Vignolles. Résurrection 45 (1975): 59–77.Google Scholar
Chrétien, Jean-Louis. L’arche de la parole. Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 1998.Google Scholar
Chrétien, Jean-Louis. The Ark of Speech. Translated by Andrew Brown. London and New York: Routledge, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chrétien, Jean-Louis. The Call and the Response. Translated by Anne Davenport. New York: Fordham University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Chrétien, Jean-Louis. Corps à corps : à l’écoute de l’œuvre d’art. Paris: Éditions de Minuit, 1997.Google Scholar
Chrétien, Jean-Louis. Hand to Hand: Listening to the Work of Art. Translated by Stephen E. Lewis. New York: Fordham University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. “Artworks in Word and Image: ‘So True, So Full of Being!’” Theory, Culture & Society 23:1 (2006): 57–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Gesammelte Werke. Vols. 1–10. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck): 1999.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. “Phenomenology, Hermeneutics, Metaphysics.” Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 25:2 (1994): 104–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Philosophical Hermeneutics. Translated and edited by Linge, David E.. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. “Plato as Portraitist.” Translated by Jamey Findling and Snezhina Gabova. Continental Philosophy Review 33:3 (2000): 245–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. The Relevance of the Beautiful and Other Essays. Translated by Nicholas Walker. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. Truth and Method. Revised translation by Joel Weinsheimer and Donald G. Marshall. London: Bloomsbury Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg and Grondin, Jean. “Looking Back with Gadamer Over his Writings and their Effective History. A Dialogue with Jean Grondin.” Theory, Culture & Society 23:1 (2006): 85–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg, Kearney, Richard, and Cleary, John. “Text Matters.” Debates in Continental Philosophy: Conversations with Contemporary Thinkers. Edited by Kearney, Richard, 167–191. New York: Fordham University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. The Basic Problems of Phenomenology. Translated by Albert Hofstadter. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Being and Time. Translated by Joan Stambaugh and Dennis J. Schmidt. New York: State University of New York Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Grundprobleme der Phänomenologie (1919/1920). Gesamtausgabe 58. Edited by Gander, Hans-Helmuth. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann Verlag, 1993.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. History of the Concept of Time. Translated by Theodore Kisiel. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Kant und das Problem der Metaphysik, Gesamtausgabe 3. Edited by von Herrmann, F.-W.. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann Verlag, 1991.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Kant and the Problem of Metaphysics. Translated by R. Taft. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Logik: Die Frage nach der Wahrheit, Gesamtausgabe 21. Edited by Biemel, Walter. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann Verlag, 1995.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Logik im Ausgang von Leibniz. Gesamtausgabe 26. Edited by Held, K.. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann Verlag, 1978.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Metaphysical Foundations of Logic. Translated by Michael Helm. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Poetry, Language, Thought. Translated by Albert Hofstadter. New York: Harper & Row Publishers, 2001.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. Sein und Zeit. Gesamtausgabe 2. Edited by von Herrman, F.-W.. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann Verlag, 1977.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. Analysen zur passiven Synthesis: Aus Vorlesungs- und Forschungsmanuskripten 1918–1926, Husserliana XI, Edited by Fleischer, Margot. The Hauge: Martinus Nijhoff, 1966.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. Analyses Concerning Passive and Active Synthesis. Translated by Anthony J. Steinbock. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology. Translated by David Carr. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1970.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. Erfahrung und Urteil. Untersuchungen zur Genealogie der Logik. Edited by Langrebe, Ludwig. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1999.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. Experience and Judgment. Translated by James S. Churchill and Karl Ameriks. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. Die Idee der Phänomenologie. Fünf Vorlesungen. Husserliana II, Edited by Biemel, Walter. The Hauge: Martinus Nijhoff, 1950.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. The Idea of Phenomenology. Translated by L. Hardy. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1995.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. Ideas for a Pure Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy: First Book: General Introduction to Pure Phenomenology. Translated by Daniel O. Dahlstrom. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company, 2014.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy, Book II. Translated by R. Rojcewicz and A. Schuwer. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1989.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie I: Allgemeine Einführung in die reine Phänomenologie. Husserliana III. Edited by Schuhmann, Jarl. The Hauge: Martinus Nijhoff, 1950.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie II: Phänomenologische Untersuchungen zur Konstitution. Husserliana IV. Edited by Biemel, Marly. The Hauge: Martinus Nijhoff, 1952.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. Die Krisis der europäischen Wissenschaftern und die Transzendentale Phänomenologie. Husserliana VI. Edited by. Biemel, Walter. The Hauge: Martinus Nijhoff, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. Logical Investigations, vol 1. Translated by J. N Findlay. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1970.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. Logische Unterschungen. I. Band: Prolegomena zur reinen Logik. Husserliana XIX. Edited by Holstein, Elmar. The Hauge: Martinus Nijhoff, 1975.Google Scholar
Kearney, Richard, Marion, Jean-Luc, and Manoussakis, John P.. “Thinking at its Limits: A Dialogue with Jean-Luc Marion.” Philosophy Today 48:1 (2004): 12–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacoste, Jean-Yves. The Appearing of God. Translated by Oliver O’Donovan. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacoste, Jean-Yves. Expérience et Absolu: Questions disputées sur l’humanité de l’homme. Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 1989.Google Scholar
Lacoste, Jean-Yves. Experience and the Absolute: Disputed Questions on the Humanity of Man. Translated by Mark Rafferty. New York: Fordham University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Lacoste, Jean-Yves. L’intuition sacramentelle et autres essais. Paris: Éditions Ad Solem, 2015.Google Scholar
Lacoste, Jean-Yves. La phénoménalité de Dieu: neuf études. Paris: Les Éditions du Cerf, 2008.Google Scholar
Lacoste, Jean-Yves. “Visages: paradoxe et gloire.” La Revue Thomiste LXXXV:4 (October–December 1985): 561–606.Google Scholar
Lacoste, Jean-Yves. “The Phenomenality of Anticipation.” Phenomenology and Eschatology: Not Yet in the Now. Edited by DeRoo, Neal and Manoussakis, John P., 15–34. Translated by Ronald Mendoza-De Jesús and Neal DeRoo. New York: Ashgate, 2009.Google Scholar
Lacoste, Jean-Yves. “Response to Gschwandtner, Hart, Schrijvers, and Hackett.” Modern Theology. 31:4 (Oct 2015): 637–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel. Autrement qu’être ou au-delà de l’essence. The Hague: Matinus Nijhoff, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel. Otherwise Then Being, or Beyond Essence. Translated by Alphonso Lingis. Pittsburgh: Dusquesne University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel. Totalité et infini: Essai sur l’extériorité. The Hague: Matinus Nijhoff, 1971.Google Scholar
Levinas, Emmanuel. Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority. Translated by Alphonso Lingis. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Marion, Jean-Luc. Being Given: Towards a Phenomenology of Givenness. Translated by Jeffrey L. Kosky. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Marion, Jean-Luc. Believing in Order to See: On the Rationality of Revelation and the Irrationality of Some Believers. Translated by Christina M. Gschwandtner New York: Fordham University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Marion, Jean-Luc. Le croire pour le voir. Réflexions diverses sur la rationalité de la révélation et l’irrationalité de quelques croyants. Paris: Parole et Silence, 2010.Google Scholar
Marion, Jean-Luc. La croisée du visible. Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 1991.Google Scholar
Marion, Jean-Luc. The Crossing of the Visible. Translated by James K. A. Smith. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Marion, Jean-Luc. On Descartes’ Metaphysical Prism: The Constitution and the Limits of Onto-theo-logy in Cartesian Thought. Translated by Jeffrey L. Kosky. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Marion, Jean-Luc. Dieu sans l’être. 4th ed. Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marion, Jean-Luc. Étant donné. Essai d’une phénoménologie de la donation. Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 1997.Google Scholar
Marion, Jean-Luc. In Excess: Studies of Saturated Phenomena. Translated by Robyn Horner and Vincent Berraud. New York: Fordham University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Marion, Jean-Luc. “Fragments sur l’idole et l’icône.” Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 84:4 (1979): 433–445.Google Scholar
Marion, Jean-Luc. Givenness and Revelation. Translated by Stephen E. Lewis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marion, Jean-Luc. God Without Being. Translated by Thomas A. Carlson. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Marion, Jean-Luc. The Idol and Distance: Five Studies. Translated by Thomas A. Carlson. New York: Fordham University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Marion, Jean-Luc. “The Impossible for Man – God.” Transcendence and Beyond: A Postmodern Inquiry. Edited by Caputo, John D. and Scanlon, Michael J., 17–43. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Marion, Jean-Luc. Au lieu de soi. L’approche de Saint Augustin. Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marion, Jean-Luc. On the Metaphysical Prism of Descartes: The Constitution and the Limits of Onto-Theo-logy in Cartesian Thought. Translated by Jeffrey L. Kosky. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Marion, Jean-Luc. “Un moment française de la phénoménologie.” Rue Descartes 1:35 (2002): 9–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marion, Jean-Luc. Negative Certainties. Translated by Stephen E. Lewis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marion, Jean-Luc. Prolegomena to Charity. Translated by Steven Lewis. New York: Fordham University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Marion, Jean-Luc. Questions cartésiennes: Méthode et métaphysique. Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 1991.Google Scholar
Marion, Jean-Luc. Cartesian Questions. Method and Metaphysics. Translated by Jeffrey L. Kosky, John Cottingham, and Stephen Voss. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Marion, Jean-Luc. Réduction et donation. Recherches sur Husserl, Heidegger et la phénoménologie. Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 2010.Google Scholar
Marion, Jean-Luc. Reduction and Givenness: Investigations of Husserl, Heidegger, and Phenomenology. Translated by Thomas A. Carlson. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Marion, Jean-Luc. Reprise du donné. Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marion, Jean-Luc. La Rigueur des Choses: Entretiens avec Dan Arbib. Paris: Flammarion, 2012.Google Scholar
Marion, Jean-Luc. The Rigor of Things. Conversations with Dan Arbib. Translated by Christina M. Gschwandtner. New York: Fordham University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Marion, Jean-Luc. “Seeing, or Seeing Oneself Seen: Nicholas of Cusa’s Contribution in De visione Dei.” Translated by Stephen E. Lewis. The Journal of Religion 96:3 (July 2016): 305–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marion, Jean-Luc. In the Self’s Place: The Approach of Saint Augustine. Translated by Jeffrey L. Kosky. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Marion, Jean-Luc. Sur la prisme métaphysique de Descartes. Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 1986.Google Scholar
Marion, Jean-Luc. De surcroît. Études sur les phénomènes saturés. Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 2001.Google Scholar
Marion, Jean-Luc. The Visible and the Revealed. Translated by Christina M. Gschwandtner. New York: Fordham University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Marion, Jean-Luc. “Voir, se voir vu voyant: L’apport de Nicolas de Cues dans le De visione Dei.” Bulletin de littérature ecclésiastique 117:2 (2016): 7–37.Google Scholar
Marion, Jean-Luc. “What We See and What Appears.” Idol Anxiety. Edited by Ellenbogen, Josh, Tugendhaft, Aaron, 152–168. Translated by Christina M. Gschwandtner. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. “Eye and Mind.” The Merleau-Ponty Reader. Edited by Toadvine, Ted and Lawlor, Leonard, 351–378. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. Phenomenology of Perception. Translated by Colin Smith. London and New York: Routledge, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. Signs. Translated by Richard McCleary. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. The Visible and the Invisible. Translated by Alphonso Lingis. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul. Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences. Edited by Thompson, John B.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul. Time and Narrative, vol. 1. Translated by Kathleen Blamey and David Pellauer Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988.Google Scholar
Sartre, Jean-Paul. Being and Nothingness: An Essay on Phenomenological Ontology. Translated by Hazel E. Barnes. New York: Washington Square Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Scheler, Max. “Liebe und Erkenntnis.” Schriften zur Soziologie und Weltanschauungslehre, Gesammelte Werke, vol. 6. Edited by Maria Scheler, 77–98. Bern/München: Francke-Verlag, 1963.Google Scholar
Scheler, Max. “Love and Knowledge.” On Feeling, Knowing, and Valuing. Selected Writings. Edited by Bershady, Harold J.. Translated by Harold J. Bershady and Peter Haley, 147–165. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Scheler, Max. The Nature of Sympathy. Translated by Peter Heath. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 2008.Google Scholar
Scheler, Max. “Ordo Amoris.” Selected Philosophical Essays. Edited and translated by David R. Lachterman, 98–135. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Scheler, Max. “Ordo Amoris.” Schiften aus dem Nachlass: I, Zur Ethik und Erkenntnislehre, 2d. ed. rev. Gesammelte Werke, vol. 10 Edited by Scheler, Maria, 345–374. Bern: Francke Verlag, 1957.Google Scholar
Scheler, Max. Wesen und Formen der Sympathie: Die deutsche Philosophie der Gegenwart, 6th edn. Gesammelte Werke, vol. 7. Edited by Frings, Manfred. Bern: Francke Verlag, 1973.Google Scholar
Stein, Edith. On the Problem of Empathy. Translated by Waltraut Stein. Washington, DC: ICS Publications, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Philosophical Investigations. Translated by G. E. M. Anscombe, P. M. S. Hacker, and Joachim Schulte. 4th Ed. Oxford: Blackwell, 2009.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Translated by David Pears and Brian McGuinness. London: Routledge, 1961.Google Scholar
Arthos, John. The Inner Word in Gadamer’s Hermeneutics. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Benson, Bruce Ellis. Graven Ideologies: Nietzsche, Derrida & Marion on Modern Idolatry. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Benson, Bruce Ellis and Wirzba, Norman, eds. The Phenomenology of Prayer. New York: Fordham University Press, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carew, Joseph. “The Threat of Givenness in Jean-Luc Marion: Toward a New Phenomenology of Psychosis.” Symposium 13:2 (2009): 97–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carthusians of Parkminster. Wound of Love: A Carthusian Miscellany. Leominster: Gracewing Press, 2006.Google Scholar
Carraud, Vincent. Pascal et la philosophie, 2nd ed. Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 2008.Google Scholar
Ciocan, Cristian. “Entre visible et invisible: les paradigmes de ‘image chez Jean-Luc Marion,” in Jean-Luc Marion: Cartésianisme, phénoménologie, théologie: actes du colloque international, les 19 et 20 mars 2010 à Budapest. Edited by Sylvain, Camilleri, Takacs, Adam, 93–113. Les cahiers de philosophie de l’Institut français de Budapest, 2010.Google Scholar
Davey, Nicholas. “Sitting Uncomfortably: A Hermeneutic Reflection on Portraiture.” Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 34:3 (2003): 231–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deniau, Guy. Cognitio Imaginativa. La phénoménologie herméneutique de Gadamer. Paris: Vrin, 2002.Google Scholar
Desmond, William. Being and the Between. New York: State University of New York Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Devereaux, Mary. “Can Art Save Us? A Mediation on Gadamer.” Philosophy and Literature 15:1 (April 1991): 59–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Cesare, Donatella. Gadamer: A Philosophical Portrait. Translated by Niall Keane. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
English, Jacques. Sur l’intentionnalité et ses modes. Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fink, Eugen. “The Phenomenological Philosophy of Edmund Husserl and Contemporary Criticism.” Translated by R. O. Elveton. The Phenomenology of Husserl: Selected Critical Readings, 73–141. Chicago: Quadrangle Books, 1970.Google Scholar
Figal, Günter. “Gadamer als Phänomenologue.” Phänomenologische Forschungen (2007): 95–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figal, Günter. “Hermeneutics as Phenomenology.” Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 40:3 (2012): 225–262.Google Scholar
Fritz, Peter Joseph. “Black Holes and Revelations: Michel Henry and Jean-Luc Marion on the Aesthetics of the Invisible.” Modern Theology 25:3 (July 2009): 415–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert-Rolfe, Jeremy. “Vision’s Resistance to Language,” in Beyond Piety: Critical Essays in the Visual Arts 1986–1993, 35–43. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Graves, Adam. “Before the Text: Ricoeur and the ‘Theological Turn.’” Studia Phaenomenologica XIII (2013): 359–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grondin, Jean. Introduction to Philosophical Hermeneutics. Translated by Joel Weinsheimer. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Grondin, Jean. The Philosophy of Gadamer. Translated by Kathryn Plant. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gschwandtner, Christina M. Degrees of Givenness: On Saturation in Jean-Luc Marion. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Gschwandtner, Christina M. “Jean-Luc Marion’s Spirituality of Adoration and its Implications for a Phenomenology of Religion,” in Breached Horizons: The Philosophy of Jean-Luc Marion. Edited by Bath, Rachel, Calcagno, Antonio, Lawson, Kathryn, and Lofts, Steve G., 188–217. London: Rowman & Littlefield, 2017.Google Scholar
Gschwandtner, Christina M. Welcoming Finitude: Toward a Phenomenology of Orthodox Liturgy. New York: Fordham University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Hart, Kevin, ed. Counter Experiences: Reading the Work of Jean-Luc Marion. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Hitchens, Christopher. The Missionary Position: Mother Teresa in Theory and Practice. London: Verso, 1995.Google Scholar
Idhe, Don. Postphenomenology: Essays in the Postmodern Context. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Jones, Tamsin. Apparent Darkness: A Genealogy of Marion’s Philosophy of Religion. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Jones, Tamsin. “Dionysius in Hans Urs von Balthasar and Jean-Luc Marion.” Modern Theology 24:4 (October 2008): 743–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Tamsin. “Traumatized Subjects: Continental Philosophy of Religion and the Ethics of Alterity.” The Journal of Religion 94:2 (April 2014): 143–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kearney, Richard. The God Who May Be. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kearney, Richard. Touch: Recovering our Most Vital Sense. New York: Columbia University Press, 2021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kearney, Richard and Treanor, Brian, eds. Carnal Hermeneutics. New York: Fordham University Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krämer, Sybille. Medium, Messenger, Transmission: An Approach to Media Philosophy. Translated by Anthony Enns. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University, Press, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krueger, Joel. “Phenomenology and the Visibility of the Mental.” 現象学会編 (Annual Review of the Phenomenological Association of Japan) 29 (2013): 13–26.Google Scholar
Littlejohn, M. E. and Rumpza, Stephanie. “Thinking God in France: A Timeless Question and A Timely Event.” Journal of Continental Philosophy of Religion 2:2 (2020): 121–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majolino, Claudio, and Desroys du Roure, Stéphane, “The Other, or How to Dispose of it. A Prolegomena to All Future Alterology That Would Like to Present Itself as Phenomenology.” Santalka Filosofija 17:3 (2009): 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manoussakis, John Panteleimon. God After Metaphysics: A Theological Aesthetics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Milbank, John. “The Gift and the Mirror,” in Counter Experiences: Reading the Work of Jean-Luc Marion. Edited by Hart, Kevin, 253–318. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Nathan. “Mystery and Manners: Eucharist in Post-Modern Theology.” Worship 79:2 (2005): 130–151.Google Scholar
Nancy, Jean-Luc. The Ground of the Image. Translated by Jeff Fort. New York: Fordham University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Prevot, Andrew. Thinking Prayer: Theology and Spirituality amid the Crisis of Modernity. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Potter, Brett David. “Image and Kenosis: Assessing Jean-Luc Marion’s Contribution to a Postmetaphysical Theological Aesthetics.” International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 79:1–2 (2018): 60–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risser, James. Hermeneutics and the Voice of the Other: Re-reading Gadamer’s Philosophical Hermeneutics. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1997.Google Scholar
Risser, James. “After the Hermeneutic Turn.” Research in Phenomenology 30:1 (2000): 71–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritter, Joachim, Gründer, Karlfried, and Gabriel, Gottfreid, eds. Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie. Vols I–XII. Basel/Stuttgart: Schwarz & Co. Verlag, 1977–2007.Google Scholar
Robinette, Brian, “A Gift to Theology? Jean-Luc Marion’s ‘Saturated Phenomena’ in Christological Perspective.” Heythrop Journal 48:1 (2007): 86–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rogers, Brian. “Traces of Reduction: Marion and Heidegger on Phenomenology of Religion.” Southern Journal of Philosophy 52:2 (June 2014): 184–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romano, Claude. At the Heart of Reason. Translated by Michael B. Smith and Claude Romano. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
Rottenberg, Ian. “Fine Art as Preparation for Christian Love.” Journal of Religious Ethics 42:2 (2014): 243–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rumpza, Stephanie. “The Ascesis of Ascesis: The Subversion of Care in Jean-Yves Lacoste and Evagrius Ponticus.” The Heythrop Journal 58:5 (2017): 780–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rumpza, Stephanie. “Icons and Analogy: Expanding our Language Game.” New Blackfriars 100:1087 (2019): 308–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rumpza, Stephanie. “Silencing the Images.” Japan Mission Journal 71:2 (Summer 2017): 116–121.Google Scholar
Sallis, John. “The Hermeneutics of the Artwork: Die Ontologie des Kunstwerks und ihre hermeneutische Bedeutung (GW 1, 87–138),” in Hans-Georg Gadamer, Wahrheit und Methode. Edited by Figal, Günter, 38–49. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, 2007.Google Scholar
Sallis, John. “On Shining Forth: Response to Günter Figal and Dennis Schmidt.” Research in Phenomenology 40:1 (2010): 115–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Dennis J. Between Word and Image: Heidegger, Klee, and Gadamer on Gesture and Genesis. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Schrijvers, Joeri. “On Doing Theology ‘After’ Ontotheology: Notes on a French Debate.” New Blackfriars 87 (2006): 302–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slatman, Jenny. “The Phenomenology of the Icon,” in Merleau-Ponty and the Possibilities of Philosophy: Transforming the Tradition. Edited by Flynn, Bernard, et al., 197–219. State University of New York Press, 2009.Google Scholar
Sokolowski, Robert. Eucharistic Presence: A Study in the Theology of Disclosure. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America, 1994.Google Scholar
Sokolowski, Robert. Pictures, Quotations, and Distinctions. Fourteen Essays in Phenomenology. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Sokolowski, Robert. Presence and Absence: A Philosophical Investigation of Language and Being. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Steinbock, Anthony J. Phenomenology and Mysticism: The Verticality of Religious Experience. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Steinbock, Anthony J. “The Poor Phenomenon: Marion and the Problem of Givenness,” in Words of Life: New Theological Turns in French Phenomenology. Edited by Ellis Benson, Bruce and Wirzba, Norman, 120–131. New York: Fordham University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Tanner, Kathryn. “Theology at the Limits of Phenomenology,” in Counter Experiences: Reading the Work of Jean-Luc Marion. Edited by Hart, Kevin, 201–234. South Bend: Notre Dame University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Taylor, Mark C. Disfiguring: Art, Architecture, and Religion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Wallenfang, Donald Lee. Dialectical Anatomy of the Eucharist: An Étude in Phenomenology. Eugene, OR: Cascade Books, 2017.Google Scholar
Ward, Graham. “The Theological Project of Jean-Luc Marion,” in Post-secular Philosophy. Edited by Blond, Philip, 229–239. London: Routledge, 1998.Google Scholar
Weinsheimer, Joel. Gadamer’s Hermeneutics: A Reading of Truth and Method. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1985.Google Scholar
Welten, Ruud. “Toward a Phenomenology of the Icon,” in Aesthetics as a Religious Factor in Eastern and Western Christianity. Edited by Bercken, Will Van den and Sutton, Jonathon, 395–403. Leuven: Peeters, 2005.Google Scholar
Westphal, Merold. “Transfiguration as Saturated Phenomenon.” Journal of Philosophy and Scripture 1:1 (2003): 26–35.Google Scholar
Alfeyev, Hilarion. L’universe spirituel d’Isaac le Syrien. Translated by André Louf. Paris: Cerf, 2019.Google Scholar
Andreopoulos, Andreas. Metamorphosis: The Transfiguration in Byzantine Theology and Iconography. Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Andreyev, Vladislav. “Creativity and the Meaning of ‘Image’ from the Perspective of the Orthodox Icon.” Translated by Nikita Andrejev. Theology Today 61 (2004) 53–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Jeffrey. “The Byzantine Panel Portrait before and after Iconoclasm,” in The Sacred Image East and West. Edited by Brubaker, Leslie and Ousterhout, Robert, 25–44. Urbana & Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Antiochian Orthodox Christian Archdiocese of North America. Saint Andrew Service Book (3rd ed.). Englewood Hills, NJ: Antiochian Orthodox Christian Archdiocese of North America, 2005.Google Scholar
Antonova, Clemena. “On the Problem of ‘Reverse Perspective’: Definitions East and West.” Leonardo 43:5 (2010): 464–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antonova, Clemena. Space, Time, and Presence in the Icon: Seeing the World with the Eyes of God. Burlington, VA: Ashgate, 2010.Google Scholar
Aslanoff, Grégoire. “Sans beauté ni éclat (Is 53:2): La représentation du Christ mort dans l’art Byzantin,” in La beau et la beauté au moyen âge. Edited by Boulnois, Olivier and Moulin, Isabelle, 321–331. Paris: Vrin, 2018.Google Scholar
Barasch, Moshe. Icon: Studies in the History of an Idea. New York: New York University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Barber, Charles. Contesting the Logic of Painting: Art and Understanding in Eleventh-Century Byzantium. Leiden: Brill, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, Charles. “Defacement.” The Yearbook of Comparative Literature 56 (2010): 104–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, Charles. Figure and Likeness: On the Limits of Representation in Byzantine Iconoclasm. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002.Google Scholar
Barber, Charles. “Theories of Art,” in Intellectual History of Byzantium. Edited by Kaldellis, Anthony and Sinniosoglou, Niketas, 129–140. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, Charles. “The Trial of Symeon the New Theologian,” in Icon and Word: The Power of Images in Byzantium. Edited by Eastmond, Antony and James, Liz, 13–24. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2003.Google Scholar
Barnard, Leslie William. The Graeco-Roman and Oriental Background of the Iconoclastic Controversy. Leiden: Brill, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnard, Leslie William. “The Theology of Images,” in Iconoclasm. Edited by Bryer, Anthony and Herrin, Judith. Birmingham: Centre for Byzantine Studies, University of Birmingham, 1977.Google Scholar
Beckwith, John. Early Christian and Byzantine Art. 2nd ed. New York: Penguin Books, 1979.Google Scholar
Belting, Hans. Likeness and Presence: A History of the Image before the Era of Art. Translated by Edmund Jephcott. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. “The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction,” in Illuminations. Edited by Arendt, Hannah, 216–252. New York: Schocken Books, 2007.Google Scholar
Besançon, Alain. The Forbidden Image: An Intellectual History of Iconoclasm. Translated by Jane Marie Todd. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Betancourt, Roland. “The Icon’s Gold: A Medium of Light, Air, and Space.” West 86th: A Journal of Decorative Arts, Design History, and Material Culture 23:1 (Fall-Winter 2016): 252–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betancourt, Roland. Sight, Touch, and Imagination in Byzantium. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boespflug, François. Dieu dans l’art. Sollicitudini Nostrae de Benoît XIV (1745) et l’affaire Crescence de Kaufbeuren. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1984.Google Scholar
Boespflug, François. Le Dieu des peintres et des sculpteurs. L’Invisible incarné. Paris: Musée du Louvre Éditions, 2010.Google Scholar
Boespflug, François. “Images,” in Dictionnaire critique de la théologie. Edited by Lacoste, Jean-Yves. Paris: Quadrige, 1998.Google Scholar
Boespflug, François and Lossky, Nicolas. Nicée II, 787–1987. Douze siècles d’images religieuses. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1987.Google Scholar
Boston, Karen. “The Power of Inscriptions,” in Icon and Word: The Power of Images in Byzantium. Edited by Eastmond, Antony and James, Liz, 35–57. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2003.Google Scholar
Boulnois, Olivier. Au-delà de l’image: Une archéologie du visuel au Moyen Âge, V-XVIe siècle. Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 2008.Google Scholar
Brown, Peter. “A Dark-Age Crisis: Aspects of the Iconoclastic Controversy.” The English Historical Review 84:346 (1974): 1–34.Google Scholar
Brubaker, Leslie and Ousterhout, Robert, eds. The Sacred Image East and West. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Brubaker, Leslie. “Image, Audience, and Place: Interaction and Reproduction,” in The Sacred Image East and West. Edited by Brubaker, Leslie and Ousterhout, Robert, 204–220. Urbana & Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Bulgakov, Sergeı̆ Nikolaevich. Icons and the Name of God. Translated by Boris Jakim. Grand Rapids, MI: W.B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2012.Google Scholar
Carnes, Nathalie. Image and Presence: A Christological Reflection on Iconoclasm and Iconophilia. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Carr, Annemarie Weyl. “Labelling Images, Venerating Icons in Sylvester Syropoulos’s World,” in Sylvester Syropoulos on Politics and Culture in the Fifteenth-Century Mediterranean. Edited by Kondyli, Fotini, Andriopoulou, Vera, Panou, Eirini, and Cunningham, Mary B., 79–106. Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2014.Google Scholar
Caseau, Béatrice. “Byzantine Christianity and Tactile Piety,” in Knowing Bodies, Passionate Souls: Sense Perceptions in Byzantium. Edited by Harvey, Susan Ashbrook and Mullett, Margaret, 209–221. Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library, 2017.Google Scholar
Cavarnos, Constantine. Byzantine Thought and Art. Belmont, MA: Institute for Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies, 1968.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, Paroma. “Problem Portraits: The Ambivalence of Visual Representation in Byzantium.” Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies 40:2 (2010): 223–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Constas, Maximos. The Art of Seeing: Paradox and Perception in Orthodox Iconography. Los Angeles: Sebastian Press, 2014.Google Scholar
Constas, Nicholas. “Icons and the Imagination.” Logos: A Journal of Catholic Thought and Culture 1:1 (Spring 1997): 114–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cormack, Robin. “‘New Art History’ vs. ‘Old History’: Writing Art History.” Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies 10:1 (1986): 223–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cormack, Robin. Painting the Soul: Icons, Death Masks, Shrouds. London: Reaktion Books, 1997.Google Scholar
Cormack, Robin. Writing in Gold: Byzantine Society and its Icons. London: George Philip, 1985.Google Scholar
Cuneo, Terrence. “If These Walls Could Only Speak.” Faith and Philosophy 27:2 (2010): 123–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dagron, Gilbert. Décrire et peindre. Essai sur le portait iconique. Paris: Gallimard, 2007.Google Scholar
Demus, Otto. Byzantine Mosaic Decoration: Aspects of Monumental Art in Byzantium. Boston: Boston Book & Art Shop, 1948.Google Scholar
Didi-Huberman, Georges. L’image ouverte: Motifs d’incarnation dans les arts visuels. Paris: Editions Gallimard, 2007.Google Scholar
Didi-Huberman, Georges. “Les théologies entre l’idole et l’icone,” in Encyclopédia Universalis-Corpus, 65–73. Paris: Encyclopaedia Universalis, vol.III, 1989.Google Scholar
Drpić, Ivan. “Art, Hesychasm, and Visual Exegesis: Parisinus Graecus 1242 Revisited.” Dumbarton Oakes Papers 62 (2008): 217–247.Google Scholar
Drpić, Ivan. Epigram: Art and Devotion in Later Byzantium. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsner, Jaś. “Iconoclasm as Discourse: From Antiquity to Byzantium.” The Art Bulletin, 94:3 (2012): 368–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evdokimov, Paul. The Art of the Icon: A Theology of Beauty. Translated by Steven Bingham. California: Oakwood Publications, 1989.Google Scholar
Falque, Emmanuel. “The All-Seeing: Fraternity and Vision of God in Nicholas of Cusa.” Translated by Kyle H. Kavanaugh and Barnabas Aspray. Modern Theology 35:4 (October 2019): 760–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Florensky, Pavel. “Reverse Perspective,” in Beyond Vision. Essays on the Perception of Art. Edited by Misler, Nicoletta, 201–272. Translated by Wendy Salmond. London: Reaktion Books, 2002.Google Scholar
Florensky, Pavel. Iconostasis. Translated by Donald Sheehan and Olga Andrejev. Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Florensky, Pavel. Pillar and Ground of Truth: An Essay in Orthodox Theodicy. Translated Boris Jakim. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Florovsky, Georges. “The Ethos of the Orthodox Church.” The Ecumenical Review 12:1 (1960): 183–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franses, Rico. “All That Is Gold Does Not Glitter: On the Strange History of Looking at Byzantine Art,” in Icon and Word: The Power of Images in Byzantium. Edited by Eastmond, Antony and James, Liz, 13–24. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2003.Google Scholar
Giakalis, Ambrosios. Images of the Divine: The Theology of Icons at the Seventh Ecumenical Council. Rev. ed. Leiden: Brill, 2005.Google Scholar
Grabar, André. Byzantine Painting: Historical and Critical Study. Translated by Stuart Gilbert. Geneva: Skira, 1953.Google Scholar
Grabar, André. Christian Iconography: A Study of its Origins. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1968.Google Scholar
Gurtler, Gary. “Plotinus and Byzantine Aesthetics.” The Modern Schoolman 66:4 (May 1989): 275–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halbertal, Moshe and Margalit, Avishai. Idolatry. Translated by Naomi Goldblum. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Harvey, Susan Ashbrook and Mullett, Margaret, eds. Knowing Bodies, Passionate Souls: Sense Perceptions in Byzantium. Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library, 2017.Google Scholar
James, Liz, ed. Art and Text in Byzantine Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
James, Liz. “Senses and Sensibility in Byzantium.” Art History. 27:4 (Sept 2004): 522–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, Robin Margaret. Face to Face. Portraits of the Divine in Early Christianity. Minneapolis: Fortress University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Kalokyris, Constantine D. “Essence of Orthodox Iconography (Part I).” Translated by Peter Chamberas. The Greek Orthodox Theological Review 12:2 (Winter 1966–1967): 168–204.Google Scholar
Kalokyris, Constantine D. “Essence of Orthodox Iconography (Part II).” Translated by Peter Chamberas. The Greek Orthodox Theological Review 13:1 (Sept 1968): 65–102.Google Scholar
Kalokyris, Constantine D. “Essence of Orthodox Iconography (Part III).” Translated by Peter Chamberas. The Greek Orthodox Theological Review 14:1 (Sept 1969): 42–64.Google Scholar
Kessler, Herbert Leon, “Reading Ancient and Medieval Art.” Word & Image 5:1 (1989): 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitzinger, Ernst. “The Cult of Images in the Age before Iconoclasm.” Dumbarton Oaks Papers 8 (1954): 83–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Komkov, Oleg. “The Vertical Form: Iconological Dimension in 20th Century Russian Religious Aesthetics and Literary Criticism.” Literature & Theology 20:1 (March 2006): 7–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kontoglou, Photis. What Orthodox Iconography Is. Boston, MA: Holy Transfiguration Monastery, n.d.Google Scholar
Krause, Karin. “Speaking Books – Silent Pictures,” in Übertragungen heiliger Texte in Judentum, Christentum und Islam: Fallstudien zu Formen und Grenzen der Transposition. Edited by Heyden, Katharina and Manuwald, Henrike, 195–261. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2019.Google Scholar
Kroug, Grégoire. Carnets d’un peintre d’icônes. Translated by Jean-Claude and Valentine Marcadé. Lausanne: Editions l’Age d’Homme, 2019.Google Scholar
Ladner, Gerhart B. “The Concept of the Image in the Greek Fathers and the Byzantine Iconoclastic Controversy.” Dumbarton Oaks Papers 7 (1953): 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leskov, Nicolai. The Sealed Angel and Other Stories. Translated by L. A. Kantz. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Lidov, Alexej. “Hierotopy: The Creation of Sacred Spaces as a Form of Creativity and Subject of Cultural History.” Hierotopy: The Creation of Sacred Spaces in Byzantium and Medieval Russia. Edited by Lidov, A., 32–58. Moscow: Indrik, 2006.Google Scholar
Lidov, Alexej. “Iconicity as Spatial Notion: A New Vision of Icons in Contemporary Art Theory.” IKON 9 (2016): 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lossky, Nicolas. Essai sur une théologie de la musique liturgique: perspective orthodoxe. Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 2003.Google Scholar
Lossky, Vladimir. “La Notion des “Analogies” chez Denys le Pseudo-Aréopagite.” Archives d’Histoire Doctrinale et Littéraire du Moyen-Age 5 (1930): 279–309.Google Scholar
Lossky, Vladimir and Ouspensky, Leonid. The Meaning of Icons. Translated by G. E. H. Palmer and E. Kadloubovsky. Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 1952.Google Scholar
Louth, Andrew. St. John Damascene: Tradition and Originality in Byzantine Theology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maguire, Henry. Art and Eloquence in Byzantium. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Maguire, Henry. “From the Evil Eye to the Eye of Justice: The Saints, Art, and Justice in Byzantium.” Law and Society in Byzantium, Ninth-Twelfth Centuries. Edited by Laiou, Angeliki E. and Simon, Dieter, 217–239. Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, 1994.Google Scholar
Maguire, Henry. “Eufrasius and Friends, on Names and Their Absence in Byzantine Art,” in Art and Text in Byzantine Culture. Edited by James, Liz, 139–160. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Maguire, Henry. The Icons of Their Bodies. Saints and Their Images in Byzantium. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Maguire, Henry. Nectar and Illusion: Nature in Byzantine Art and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press: 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maguire, Henry. Rhetoric, Nature and Magic in Byzantine Art. Aldershot: Ashgate, 1998.Google Scholar
Mathews, Thomas E. The Clash of the Gods. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mathews, Thomas E. The Dawn of Christian Art in Panel Paintings and Icons. Los Angeles: Getty Publications, 2016.Google Scholar
Mathews, Thomas E. “The Sequel to Nicaea II in Byzantine Church Decoration.” Perkins Journal (July 1988): 11–21.Google Scholar
Mendez, Hugo. “‘Overcoming Divide’ as a Motif in Eastern Christian Liturgy.” Studia Liturgica 43:2 (2013): 281–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mondzain, Marie-José. Image, Icon, Economy: The Byzantine Origins of the Contemporary Imaginary. Translated by Rico Franses. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Moyaert, Paul. “In Defense of Praying with Images.” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 81:4 (2007): 595–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moyaert, Paul. “Touching God in his Image.” Heythrop Journal 56:2 (Mar 2015): 192–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Robert S. “The Discourse of Icons, Then and Now.” Art History 12:2 (1989): 143–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Robert S. “Living on the Byzantine Borders of Western Art.” Gesta 35 (1996): 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Robert S. “To Say and to See: Ekphrasis and Vision in Byzantium.” Visuality Before and Beyond the Renaissance: Seeing as Others Saw. Edited by Nelson, Robert, 143–168. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
Nelson, Robert S. “Image and Inscription: Pleas for Salvation in Spaces of Devotion,” in Art and Text in Byzantine Culture. Edited by James, Liz, 100–102. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Ouspensky, Leonid. Theology of the Icon, vols. 1–2. Translated by Anthony Gythiel. Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Ouspensky, Leonid. Essai sur la Théologie de l’icône dans l’Église orthodoxe. Paris: Éditions de l’Exarchat patriarcal russe en Europe occidentale, 1960.Google Scholar
Parry, Kenneth. Depicting the Word: Byzantine Iconophile Thought of the Eighth and Ninth Centuries. Leiden: Brill, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peers, Glenn. Animism, Materiality, and Museums: How Do Byzantine Things Feel? Leeds: Arc Humanities Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Peers, Glenn. “Real Living Painting: Quasi-Objects and Dividuation in the Byzantine World.” Religion and the Arts 16:5 (2012): 433–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peers, Glenn. “Sense Lives of Byzantine Things,” in Knowing Bodies, Passionate Souls: Sense Perceptions in Byzantium. Edited by Harvey, Susan Ashbrook and Mullett, Margaret, 11–30. Washington, DC: Dumbarton Oaks Research Library, 2017.Google Scholar
Pelikan, Jaroslav. Imago Dei: The Byzantine Apologia for Icons. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pentcheva, Bissera V. “Glittering Eyes: Animation in the Byzantine Eikon And the Western Imago.” Codex Aquilarensis 32 (2016): 209–236.Google Scholar
Pentcheva, Bissera V. “Performing the Sacred in Byzantium: Image, Breath, and Sound.” Performance Research 19:3 (2014): 120–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pentcheva, Bissera V. “Epigrams on Icons.” Art and Text in Byzantine Culture. Edited by James, Liz, 120–138. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2007.Google Scholar
Pentcheva, Bissera V. “The Performative Icon.” The Art Bulletin 88:4 (Dec., 2006): 631–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pentcheva, Bissera V. The Sensual Icon: Space Ritual and The Senses in Byzantium. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State Press, 2010.Google Scholar
Rice, D. Talbot. The Appreciation of Byzantine Art. London: Oxford University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Rumpza, Stephanie. “Longing in the Flesh: A Phenomenological Account of Icon Veneration.” International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 81:5 (2020): 466–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schönborn, Christoph von. God’s Human Face: The Christ-Icon. Translated by Lothar Krauth. San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 1994.Google Scholar
Sendler, Egon. The Icon: Image of the Invisible. Elements of Theology, Aesthetics and Technique. Translated by Stephen Bingham. Redondo Beach, CA: Oakwood Publications, 1995.Google Scholar
Sendler, Egon. Les mystères du Christ: les icônes de la liturgie. Paris: Desclée de Brouwer, 2001.Google Scholar
Ševčenko, Nancy Patterson. The Celebration of the Saints in Byzantine Art and Liturgy. Farnham; Burlington, VT: Ashgate Variorum, 2013.Google Scholar
Ševčenko, Nancy Patterson. “Art and Liturgy,” in Oxford Handbook of Byzantine Studies. Edited by Jeffreys, Elizabeth. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Ševčenko, Nancy Patterson. “Close Encounters: contact between holy figures and the faithful as represented in Byzantine works of art.” Byzance et les images. Edited by Guillou, A. and Durand, J., 257–285. Cycle de conférence organisé au musée du Louvre, 1992; Paris, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ševčenko, Nancy Patterson. “The Vita Icon and the Painter as Hagiographer.” Dumbarton Oaks Papers 53 (1999): 150–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strezova, Anita. “The Icon of the Trinity By Andrei Rublev,” in Hesychasm and Art. The Appearance of New Iconographic Trends in Byzantine and Slavic Lands in the 14th and 15th Centuries, 173–231. Canberra: Australian National University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarasov, Oleg. Icon and Devotion: Sacred Spaces in Imperial Russia. Translated and edited by Robin Milner-Gulland. London: Reaktion Books, 2002.Google Scholar
Tsakiridou, C. A. Icons in Time, Persons in Eternity: Orthodox Theology and the Aesthetics of the Christian Image. Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2013.Google Scholar
Vasileios of Stavronikita. Hymn of Entry: Liturgy and Life in the Orthodox Church. Translated by Elizabeth Briere. Crestwood, NY: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Vikan, Gary. “Ruminations on Edible Icons: Originals and Copies in the Art of Byzantium.” Studies in the History of Art 20 (1989): 47–59.Google Scholar
Vasiliu, Anca. EIKÔN: L’image dans le discours des trois Cappodociens. Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, Graham. “The Beauty of God.” Theological Perspectives on God and Beauty, 35–65. Harrisburg, PA: Trinity Press International, 2003.Google Scholar
Weiztmann, Kurt. The Icon: Holy Images – Sixth to Fourteenth Century. New York: George Braziller, Inc., 1978Google Scholar
Williams, Rowan. The Dwelling of the Light. Praying with Icons of Christ. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2003.Google Scholar
Wolterstorff, Nicholas. “Would you Stomp on a Picture of Your Mother? Would you Kiss an Icon?” Faith and Philosophy 32:1 (2015): 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wulff, Oskar, “Die umgekehrte Perspektive und die Niedersicht. Eine Raumanschauungsform der altbyzantischen Kunst und ihre Fortbildung in der Renaissance,” in Kunstwissenschaftliche Beiträge August Schmarsow gewidmet zum fünfzigsten Semester seiner akademischen Lehrtätigkeit. Edited by Weizsäcker, H., 3–42. Leipzig: K. W. Hiersein, 1907.Google Scholar