Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- List of contributors
- Preface
- Foreword
- Selected international publications by Çiğdem Kağıtçıbaşı
- I Cultural and cross-cultural psychology: selected perspectives
- II Development in the family context
- III Culture and self
- IV Social change, family, and gender
- 13 One or two pathways to modernity? A systematic comparison of Kağıtçıbaşı's Model of Family Change and the Model of the Second Demographic Transition
- 14 Living together in culturally-plural societies: Understanding and managing acculturation and multiculturalism
- 15 Cultural continuity and discontinuity in Turkish migrant families: Extending the Model of Family Change
- 16 Values and attitudes of young people in urban Turkey: A further test of Schwartz's theory of values and Kağıtçıbaşı's Model of Family Change
- 17 Career development of professional women in Turkey
- V Induced change
- Epilogue
- Subject Index
- Author Index
- References
13 - One or two pathways to modernity? A systematic comparison of Kağıtçıbaşı's Model of Family Change and the Model of the Second Demographic Transition
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 August 2010
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of figures
- List of tables
- List of contributors
- Preface
- Foreword
- Selected international publications by Çiğdem Kağıtçıbaşı
- I Cultural and cross-cultural psychology: selected perspectives
- II Development in the family context
- III Culture and self
- IV Social change, family, and gender
- 13 One or two pathways to modernity? A systematic comparison of Kağıtçıbaşı's Model of Family Change and the Model of the Second Demographic Transition
- 14 Living together in culturally-plural societies: Understanding and managing acculturation and multiculturalism
- 15 Cultural continuity and discontinuity in Turkish migrant families: Extending the Model of Family Change
- 16 Values and attitudes of young people in urban Turkey: A further test of Schwartz's theory of values and Kağıtçıbaşı's Model of Family Change
- 17 Career development of professional women in Turkey
- V Induced change
- Epilogue
- Subject Index
- Author Index
- References
Summary
I got to know Çiğdem Kağıtçıbaşı on my first visit to Turkey in 1985, when trying to validate my empirical research on Turkish immigrant families in Germany in discussions with Turkish social scientists. This visit introduced me to the concept value of children, which thereafter became most influential to my academic work, both at the theoretical level, as it fitted well into modern sociological action theory and multi-level approaches, and in empirical research, as Çiğdem Kağıtçıbaşı's analyses were always at the interface of psychology and social sciences. During several encounters thereafter on various occasions, I felt much encouraged to take the initiative for a replication of the Value of Children (VOC) studies twenty five years later, which was the baseline for the following thoughts. I will always admire Çiğdem Kağıtçıbaşı for her ability to combine sharp analytical thinking with a humanitarian engagement for a civic society.
Introduction
Theorizing about the interrelationship between macro-social change and family structure has been a major feature of the various disciplines of the social sciences from their very beginning. In many cases, “family” was seen as the social group where the impact of social change could be understood in its greatest depth (Thornton 2005). Accordingly, the history of social sciences is full of examples of sequential models of social change and its consequences on family and kinship.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Perspectives on Human Development, Family, and Culture , pp. 209 - 226Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2009
References
, “The relevance of ideational changes to family transformation in postwar Japan,” in , , and (eds.), International Family Change: Ideational Perspectives (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2008), pp. 223–50.Google Scholar
, “The conjugal family,” in (ed.), Emile Durkheim on Institutional Analysis (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1892/1978), pp. 229–39.Google Scholar
, , , , and , “Methodology of the study,” in , , , , and (eds.), Families across Cultures. A 30-nation Psychological Study (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006), pp. 111–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, The Oriental, the Ancient and the Primitive. Systems of Marriage and the Family in the Pre-industrial Societies of Eurasia (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “European marriage patterns in perspective,” in and (eds.), Population in History (Chicago: Aldine, 1965), pp. 101–43.Google Scholar
, The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles among Western Publics (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1977).Google Scholar
, Modernization and Postmodernization. Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
, “Intra-family interaction and a model of family change,” in (ed.), Family in Turkish Society (Ankara, Turkey: MAYA, 1985), pp. 149–65.Google Scholar
, “Family and socialization in cross-cultural perspective: A model of change,” in (ed.), Cross-cultural Perspectives: Nebraska Symposium on Motivation 1989 (Lincoln: Nebraska University Press, 1990), pp. 135–200.Google Scholar
, Family and Human Development across Cultures: A View from the Other Side (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1996).Google Scholar
, “Cross-cultural perspectives on family change,” in and (eds.), Autonomy and Dependence in the Family: Turkey and Sweden in Critical Perspective (Istanbul: Swedish Research Institute, 2002), pp. 19–38.Google Scholar
, “Autonomy and relatedness in cultural context: Implications for self and family,”Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36 (2005), 403–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , Ç. Kağıtçıbaşı, , and (eds.), Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method, and Applications (Thousand Oaks/London: Sage, 1994).Google Scholar
, The Passing of Traditional Society: Modernizing in the Middle East (Glencoe, IL: Free Press, 1958).Google Scholar
, “A century of demographic and cultural change in western Europe: An exploration of underlying dimensions,”Population and Development Review, 9 (1983), 411–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , “From the first to the second demographic transition: An interpretation of the spatial continuity of demographic innovation in France, Belgium and Switzerland,”European Journal of Population, 18 (2002), 325–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , “Cultural dynamics and economic theories of fertility change,”Population and Development Review, 14 (1988), 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , “When history moves on: The foundations and diffusion of a second demographic transition,” in , , and (eds.), International Family Change: Ideational Perspectives (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2008), pp. 81–117.Google Scholar
and , “Is low fertility a temporary phenomenon in the European Union?,”Population and Development Review, 25 (1999), 211–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, , and , Household Formation and the “Second Demographic Transition” in Europe and the US: Insights from Middle Range Models (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 2008).
, “Familiensystem und Kultur [Family system and culture],” in and (eds.), Kulturvergleichende Psychologie. Volume 1. Theorien und Methoden in der kulturvergleichenden und kulturpsychologischen Forschung [Cross-cultural Comparative Psychology. Volume 1. Theories and Methods in Cross-cultural and Culture-psychological Research] (Göttingen: Hogrefe, 2007), pp. 405–84.Google Scholar
and , “Family change in Turkey: Peasant society, Islam, and the revolution ‘from above,’” in , , and (eds.), International Family Change: Ideational Perspectives (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2008, pp. 281–312.Google Scholar
, “Population – the long view,” in (ed.), Food for the World (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1945), pp. 37–57.Google Scholar
, “Duofocal family structure and an alternative model of husband–wife relationship,” in (ed.), Sex Roles, Family, and Community in Turkey (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1982), pp. 33–72.Google Scholar
, “The kinship system of the contemporary United States,”American Anthropologist, 45 (1943), 22–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and , “Value orientations and the second demographic transition (SDT) in Northern, Western and Southern Europe: An update,”Demographic Research, 3 (2004), 45–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
and “Childlessness, only children, and the second demographic transition in Japan,” paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, 2005.
, Reading History Sideways: The Fallacy and Enduring Impact of the Developmental Paradigm on Family Life (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005).Google Scholar
, “Europe's second demographic transition,” in Population Bulletin, Volume 42 (Washington: Population Reference Bureau, 1987).Google Scholar
, “Demographic transition, second,”International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5 (2001), 3486–88.Google Scholar
, “The idea of a second demographic transition in industrialized countries,”Journal of Population and Social Security, 1 (2003).Google Scholar
, “Is the second demographic transition a useful research concept? Questions and answers,” in Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2004 (Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 2004), pp. 4–10.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by