Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T03:46:24.753Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Human rights in areas of limited statehood

The new agenda

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2013

Thomas Risse
Affiliation:
Freie Universität Berlin
Stephen C. Ropp
Affiliation:
University of Wyoming
Kathryn Sikkink
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota
Get access

Summary

The Power of Human Rights (PoHR; Risse et al. 1999) developed a spiral model of human rights change that started from four implicit and interrelated assumptions:

  1. Human rights-violating states are consolidated states that enjoy both the monopoly over the means of violence and the ability to make and fully implement central political decisions.

  2. Illiberal regimes violate human rights intentionally, that is, because they want to, not because they lack the capacity to comply with international norms.

  3. Rights-violating perpetrators are state actors for the most part.

  4. (Transnational) non-state actors promote compliance with international human rights by pressuring state actors towards norm adoption and implementation and by socializing them into the new norms, respectively.

These assumptions are valid for the cases discussed in PoHR and beyond (see Chapter 2). But they do not fit “areas of limited statehood,” i.e. territorial or functional spaces in which national governments do not control the means of violence and/or are incapable to implement or enforce central decisions including the law. We argue in the following that consolidated statehood forms the exception rather than the rule in the contemporary international system and that “areas of limited statehood” are more widespread than is commonly assumed (see Risse 2011b; Risse and Lehmkuhl 2007). In particular, areas of limited statehood are not confined to fragile, failing or failed states, but characterize most developing countries in the current world system.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Persistent Power of Human Rights
From Commitment to Compliance
, pp. 63 - 84
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure [email protected] is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×